[00:00] <Nafallo> elmo: around to check the above? :-)
[00:00] <Fujitsu> geser: Yeah, I can see other recent things missing.
[00:00] <Fujitsu> And the timestamp on the various files is late on the 15th.
[00:01] <Nafallo> Packages haven't really updated either.
[00:01] <Fujitsu> geser: Binaries should appear on a.u.c soon after publisher finishes, which is about 45 past the hour.
[00:02] <geser> Fujitsu: that's what I remember
[00:02] <geser> perhaps the FF got also implemented on a.u.c :)
[00:02] <Fujitsu> Heh.
[00:07] <pixelpapst> hmm, no LP here to answer my question ? then I'll go and open a ticket, i guess
[00:07] <pixelpapst> LP admins, even
[00:08] <LarstiQ> pixelpapst: that's probably wise, although they'll know about it on Monday
[00:09] <pixelpapst> just hoped i could get around it as i'm too lazy ;)
[00:33] <superm1> do the other mirrors all sync off a.u.c i'm guessing?  so switching to a different mirror won't do all much of good
[00:37] <RAOF> Is anyone having PPA troubles today?  I uploaded a new nouveau package, and that's fine, but the PPA is silently eating my libdrm uploads.
[00:37] <Nafallo> superm1: no
[00:37] <pixelpapst> Ok, posted as question 24847 ( https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/24847 )
[00:37] <Nafallo> superm1: but I bet the problem lays deeper in the mirror machinery.
[00:38] <superm1> Nafallo, :(
[00:38] <pixelpapst> i guess i'll do a RL waidpid() for now :-)
[02:08] <profoX`> Hi.. Can I integrate a svn repository in Launchpad?
[02:08] <Fujitsu> profoX`: You can have a read-only Bazaar import of your Subversion repository if you wish.
[02:09] <profoX`> Fujitsu: meaning.. users can checkout through the bzr system but developers still need svn?
[02:10] <Fujitsu> profoX`: Correct. Launchpad doesn't provide facilities for hosting writable Subversion repositories, just Bazaar ones.
[02:10] <profoX`> I'm actually starting a new project.. what advantage would it give me if I would use Bazaar instead of Subversion? The reason I want to use Subversion is because I'm familiar with it and because ohloh doesn't support Bazaar.
[02:11] <Fujitsu> Bazaar is very easy to use, is fully supported by Launchpad, allows distributed development models...
[02:13] <profoX`> hmmm.. if I can find a way to make ohloh use a bazaar branch (there's probably some Bazaar->Svn thing somewhere) I'll try bazaar for this project (because of the good launchpad integration)
[02:16] <profoX`> hmm, another good question: is it possible to rename the name of a project thats registered on launchpad,
[02:17] <profoX`> or was the only problem that you couldn't delete them
[02:17] <Fujitsu> I believe a Launchpad administrator should be able to rename a project.
[02:21] <profoX`> because my project has a temp name
[02:22] <Fujitsu> If you want it renamed, ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion.
[02:22] <profoX`> ok
[02:30] <profoX`> wheres the bzr beginners docu :)
[02:40] <Fujitsu> profoX`: http://bazaar-vcs.org/ probably has a few useful links.
[02:40] <profoX`> yea i found some
[02:40] <Fujitsu> On general bzr usage, migration from other things, etc.
[02:41] <profoX`> i'm waiting until launchpad shows me the branch is published..
[02:41] <profoX`> ah, it worked
[02:46] <jml> hooray
[03:21] <cprov> Fujitsu: ispanish binary is build by espa-nol source now, see https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/espa-nol/1.9-13
[03:25] <Fujitsu> cprov: Perhaps so, but look at the binary publishings for it.
[03:26] <Fujitsu> It was promoted, gaining two main publishings. They are both now superseded.
[03:28] <Fujitsu> cprov: Also, archive.ubuntu.com seems out of date.
[03:38] <cprov> Fujitsu: contact IS about mirror issues.
[03:39] <Fujitsu> cprov: So it is just a mirror issue, and not publisher not running?
[03:40] <cprov> Fujitsu: drescher disk is fine, AFAICS
[03:40] <Fujitsu> OK, thanks.
[03:41] <cprov> Fujitsu: the problem with ispanish binary is that it was overridden twice to main ... do you know who did the override ?
[03:43] <Fujitsu> cprov: You can likely work that out from the archive admin schedule, but I don't know who did it.
[03:44] <cprov> Fujitsu: do they have a publish schedule ?
[03:44] <cprov> Fujitsu: anyway, file a bug, I can recover it on Monday.
[03:45] <Fujitsu> cprov: Will do. Thanks for looking into it.
[03:45] <cprov> Fujitsu: np, you are welcome.
[04:00] <ubotu> New bug: #192547 in soyuz "Doubly-overridden binaries get eaten" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192547
[04:06] <cprov-ZzZ> g'night, folks.
[04:09] <Fujitsu> Night cprov-ZzZ.
[10:30] <Seq> Hello, can anybody help me solve both a "Failed to Upload" and a "chroot problem"? https://edge.launchpad.net/~mactel-support/+archive/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all
[10:33] <thumper> !weekend
[10:33] <ubotu> It's a weekend.  Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question.  Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week.
[10:37] <Seq> Thanks thumper, It's fine to wait. I was just hoping I'd hit somebody that knew what was going on.
[12:02] <mdke> Seveas: did you ever find a way to have your bot broadcast commit messages into channels?
[12:03] <Seveas> mdke, haven't actively looked at it
[12:03] <mdke> Seveas: ok, fair enough
[12:04] <mdke> Seveas: do you think it would be difficult? is the method it uses for new bugs quite complicated?
[12:04] <Seveas> it's not difficult but ubotu is maintenance-only 
[12:04] <mdke> what does that mean?
[12:05] <Seveas> I'm not adding new features to it
[12:06] <mdke> does that mean that you don't have time, or that even if someone else was willing to work on it, it wouldn't be allowed?
[12:06] <Seveas> the former
[12:07] <mdke> okay. I might make an appeal for someone with skills to give it a shot then. the docteam would find it useful, and I guess other communities in Ubuntu/LP might too
[12:07] <mdke> are there hardware limitations?
[12:13] <mdke> or bandwidth / space issues?
[12:20] <ubotu> New bug: #192615 in launchpad "Launchpads error reporting is crap" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192615
[12:22] <stdin> what a lovely bug title...
[12:25] <ubotu> New bug: #192616 in malone "Should tell the user how to associate a bug with a Ubuntu package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192616
[19:31] <ubotu> New bug: #192713 in soyuz "PPA packages fail to upload but build successfully" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192713
[19:57] <schmichael> how can i delete my project from launchpad?
[20:12] <stdin> schmichael: file a request at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[20:13] <schmichael> stdin: thanks!
[20:42] <Seq> Has anybody else been having a problem with all packages getting a "Failure to upload" error?
[20:46] <pochu> Seq: bug #192713?
[20:46] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 192713 in soyuz "PPA packages fail to upload but build successfully" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192713
[20:46] <Seq> pochu: that's it, yes.
[20:47] <Seq> pochu: I reported that bug
[20:48] <pochu> Seq: then just wait until tomorrow. Devs aren't expected to be here on Sundays ;)
[20:48] <lifeless> I would love to be able to attach multiple things at once :)
[20:48] <pochu> lifeless: ++
[20:48] <Seq> I know, I'll probably have to wait until tomorrow anyway. I just figured I'd try asking today anyway
[20:48] <mwhudson_> attach via email!
[20:48] <mwhudson_> (soon, maybe)
[20:49] <pochu> I'd love to be able to dput to launchpad bug reports ;)
[20:49] <pochu> mwhudson_: err, that's not possible, is it?
[20:49] <mwhudson_> no, it's not
[20:49] <pochu> ah
[20:50] <Fujitsu> Seq: Is there anything special about linux-headers-2.6.24-8-generic?
[20:50] <Fujitsu> Seq: If you build that, can you unpack it locally?
[20:50] <mwhudson_> it's In Progress though: https://edge.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/30225
[20:50] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 30225 in malone/1.2 "Attach files via email" [High,In progress]  - Assigned to Abel Deuring (adeuring)
[21:01] <Seq> Fujitsu: not really. I actually had it build and upload 2.6.24-8.13~macbook0 successfully. I made a slight change for ~macbook1 (added 386 to the build flavours of i386), and now it doesn't upload (though build works fine).
[21:04] <tomek> hello, how long do I have to wait for accepting my .pot file for translations?
[21:04] <Seq> Fujitsu: I've taken a gutsy 2.6.22 kernel that worked properly on ~chrisirwin ppa and put it onto ~mactel-support ppa, and it fails to upload as well. This was given the exact same source I had uploaded to ~chrisirwin originally
[21:07] <tomek> could someone push my .pot through? I need them for experiments with Visual Studio
[21:13] <tomek> statik: ping :)
[21:30] <mpt> Goooooooooooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[21:46] <warp10> Is there a way to edit or delete a comment or an attachement in a Lunchpad bug?
[23:13] <mpt> warp10, not yet
[23:13] <mpt> that's bug 80895
[23:13] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 80895 in malone "Give people five minutes to edit/delete their comment" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/80895
[23:15] <Fujitsu> mpt, warp10: You can delete attachments.
[23:16] <mpt> ah yes, so you can
[23:16] <warp10> mpt: thanks for the pointer. I would like to see editing capability, at least for members of team like bugcontrol or motu.
[23:16]  * mpt has never used that
[23:16] <mpt> see also bug 1734
[23:16] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1734 in malone "Need ability to mark bug comments as obsolete" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1734
[23:17] <warp10> Fujitsu: indeed. I browsed the whole launchpad, than I seen the gray box just left of my bug -_-
[23:19] <Fujitsu> I have to say it isn't exactly obvious, hidden behind the pencil in the portlet that is contracted by default.
[23:20] <Fujitsu> Oh, it's not even a pencil. It just says `edit'
[23:20] <warp10> Fujitsu: it would be nice to have an edit link close to the attachment. It would make it easier to find the one to remove too
[23:21] <mpt> please report a bug about that
[23:21] <warp10> mpt: good idea. I'll do that tomorrow, it's bed-time for my side of the world :)
[23:24] <mpt> If it takes longer than 2 minutes, you're doing it wrong :-)
[23:26] <ubotu> New bug: #192775 in rosetta "Notification after upload refers to "1 files"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192775
[23:31] <Pricey> Three times now, I've accidentally pressed the "approve" button rather than the "decline" button. After correcting the mistake, the users show up on the deactivated list. Is there any way I could have 3 entries removed by an admin type person so that there is no confusion whether they were once part of the team?