| osmosis | soren: thats the problem though, its not 2.6.24-8 ... it says http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/admin/xen-image-2.6.19-4-server | 04:15 |
|---|---|---|
| osmosis | soren: err...i see, different name. | 04:15 |
| osmosis | soren: wonder why the old package is still there too. | 04:16 |
| osmosis | new, http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/base/linux-image-2.6.24-7-xen | 04:19 |
| osmosis | yay! has amd64 support too. | 04:20 |
| kraut | moin | 08:25 |
| eradicus | hi kraut, do you have any idea why i get module.h not found, even if I have installed the header and source and had my /usr/src/linux pointed to the right kernel source? | 08:42 |
| kraut | eradicus: did you do a find on the source-tree to find that file? | 08:46 |
| === fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
| abogani | eradicus: /usr/src/linux is a old-style linux source auto-pointer. Now /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build is used instead. | 09:03 |
| abogani | check to have linux-headers-generic installed. | 09:04 |
| eradicus | abogani: so i have to redefine /usr/src/linux to point to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ? | 09:07 |
| Keybuk | gnargh | 09:18 |
| Keybuk | resume from suspend consistently fails on this laptop under hardy | 09:18 |
| Tonio_ | hi there | 11:18 |
| Tonio_ | there is a patch for alsa and macbook that was on feisty and was lost during the edgy dev cycle... | 11:19 |
| Tonio_ | I discussed with crimsun_ about including it again and he is okay on rationale | 11:19 |
| Tonio_ | here is the patch http://paste.toniox.org/2813 | 11:19 |
| Tonio_ | it closes bug 87253 | 11:19 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87253 | 11:19 |
| Tonio_ | sound support on the concernd macbooks is only partial with the current driver (I can confirm the issue, I have one of those macbooks) | 11:20 |
| Tonio_ | I hope this patch can be included to the current kernel before hardy is released ! | 11:20 |
| JanCG | Tonio_, you might want to reopen that bug (or open a new one) with the patch attached | 11:44 |
| Tonio_ | JanCG: sure ;) | 11:51 |
| amitk | Tonio_: just modify the existing bug | 11:53 |
| amitk | Tonio_: target it to linux-2.6.24, hardy | 11:54 |
| amitk | I assume you have tested Hardy and it still doesn't work for you? | 11:54 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: without the patch, no it doesn't work ;) | 11:55 |
| amitk | Tonio_: any reason why this patch hasn't made it upstream yet? | 11:56 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: they probably want something more generic that doing depending the dev id | 11:59 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: I suspect that the "if (codec->revision_id == 0x103401) -> else" isn't very welcomed | 11:59 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: btw crimsun_ would know more on that point, as it did the patch for feisty | 11:59 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253 | 12:02 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 87253 in linux "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,New] | 12:02 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: I hope I filed it the good way, please lemme know if that's not correct ;) | 12:03 |
| amitk | Tonio_: looks good | 12:05 |
| amitk | Tonio_: although, for future reference, you should have left the old package (linux-source-2.6.20) in there and just add a new one for the hardy kernel, to maintain history. | 12:10 |
| Tonio_ | hum true..... I'll change that | 12:11 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253 | 12:16 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,Fix released] | 12:16 |
| Tonio_ | amitk: should be okay now | 12:16 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === juliank0 is now known as juliank | ||
| === fabbione is now known as thegodfather | ||
| BenC | amitk, rtg, smb, king_: ping | 16:59 |
| amitk | here | 16:59 |
| smb | BenC: here | 16:59 |
| rtg | BenC: yo | 16:59 |
| * BenC waits for king and his new super fast cable line to respond | 17:00 | |
| king_ | BenC: my cable is fast - I was just busy! | 17:02 |
| BenC | hehe | 17:02 |
| king_ | BenC: ..busy downloading loads of stuff :-) | 17:03 |
| BenC | Ok, welcome to the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting. As usual, you can find the agenda, as well as past minutes, at this location: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting | 17:03 |
| BenC | Not much in the way of team status... | 17:04 |
| BenC | rtg: How about a quick overview of the -9 kernel aimed for Alpha 5, and the state of re-upload? | 17:04 |
| rtg | the big items in -9 are /dev/mem and /dev/kmem protection. | 17:04 |
| rtg | working on getting -9 to build, but no upload until after A5. | 17:05 |
| rtg | also working on some ABI issues raised by Fabio. | 17:05 |
| rtg | ALSA modules create a different ABI then the kernel. | 17:05 |
| rtg | linux-meta has some deficcienties that need fixed. | 17:06 |
| rtg | thats about all for me. | 17:06 |
| smb | rtg: This will also get lum pulled freshly, won't it? Cause I had to fixup the dmraid45 | 17:06 |
| rtg | smb: yep | 17:06 |
| smb | rtg: Good:) | 17:06 |
| rtg | but not until thursday late. | 17:06 |
| BenC | Alright, sounds like we have everything under control, even if the deadline for upload did get missed | 17:07 |
| rtg | BenC: back to you... | 17:07 |
| BenC | rtg: when was -9 uploaded? | 17:07 |
| rtg | yesterday. | 17:08 |
| BenC | the first upload | 17:08 |
| rtg | the linux-headers package was fubar'd. | 17:08 |
| BenC | Ok, that's part of the reason for missing the A5 freeze...deadline for upload of kernel was Sunday | 17:08 |
| rtg | the its serendipitous, huh? | 17:09 |
| BenC | not a problem, but something to watch out for | 17:09 |
| BenC | Next up, QA bug list for the kernel, which seems to have been knocked out very well since last week | 17:10 |
| BenC | The only thing I'd comment on right now is we have 11 bugs in the past column that are not assigned to anyone, so we should either close as wont-fix, or one of us pick them up | 17:11 |
| BenC | Good job on getting things handled from last week though | 17:11 |
| BenC | Well, other than that, we are pretty much done...anyone want to comment one anything? | 17:13 |
| amitk | perhaps it is good to announce the patch deadline | 17:14 |
| BenC | amitk: the patch deadline is rolling, and it's always the day before the kernel upload window starts | 17:14 |
| amitk | BenC: aah. I misunderstood it then. Nevermind. | 17:15 |
| BenC | Maybe it would be a good idea to link to the read-only ubuntu-kernel-release-schedule google cal though | 17:16 |
| BenC | We can add it to the KernelTeam wiki resources | 17:16 |
| king_ | BenC: Does this mean we should refrain from putting in large patches into the kernel now? | 17:16 |
| BenC | The kernel freeze itself isn't until March 4th | 17:17 |
| BenC | but we should take care with whatever patches are going in right now | 17:18 |
| BenC | Once we hit kernel freeze, we aren't doing anything except major bug fixes | 17:18 |
| king_ | OK - I am probably going to refrain from putting a large and hairy patch for the broadcom b43 driver then ... | 17:18 |
| king_ | ..especially as there is a NDIS wrapper solution | 17:19 |
| rtg | 2.6.24.2 already has a big patch for B43. | 17:19 |
| BenC | We may have some alternative with regard to b43 | 17:19 |
| king_ | rtg: And there is another one for a specific revision 02 of a board. I think it should wait | 17:20 |
| BenC | Ok, if there's nothing further... | 17:20 |
| rtg | king_: depends. does it help? b43 is largely non-functional from what I can tell. | 17:20 |
| BenC | Ok, meeting adjourned...have a great week everyone, and thanks for attending | 17:24 |
| === LifeHacker is now known as tuxmaniac | ||
| johanbr | rtg: Do you mean non-functional in general? If so, I think that's an exaggeration. | 18:01 |
| === smb is now known as smb_away | ||
| smagoun_ | The git tag for the 2.6.24-8.13 LUM upload doesn't match what's in the source package. Is that intentional? | 18:13 |
| smagoun_ | amitk: ^^^^ | 18:26 |
| amitk | smagoun_: yes. Since the top commit of PPA packages is thrown away when we rebase to latest hardy | 19:10 |
| smagoun_ | amitk: I'm referring to the Hardy LUM, not the one in the PPA. For example, commit 80b905953dde820e13869e1859427baaa0bba3ba is included in the 2.6.24-8.13 source tarball, but it's not present in the 2.6.24-8.13 tag in the Hardy LUM tree | 19:12 |
| amitk | smagoun_: rtg probably repushed the 'UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13' commit, thereby nuking the old id. rtg, commit f0b376c9ec128db651d83d9f690af7351d6d2a37 should have the Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13 tag, you need to delete the old tag and create a new one point to this commit. | 19:27 |
| amitk | *pointing | 19:28 |
| * amitk -> dinner | 19:28 | |
| === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso | ||
| === smb_away is now known as smb | ||
| smagoun_ | amitk: That clears things up for me. Thanks for the help! | 19:48 |
| rtg | smagoun_: Hardy LUM tags are corrected. | 19:53 |
| smagoun_ | rtg: thanks | 20:00 |
| === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara | ||
| === smb is now known as smb_away | ||
| abogani | I'm incredible stupid :-( | 23:57 |
| _MMA_ | ? | 23:58 |
| abogani | _MMA_, Bug #193078... Perhaps too much punches? :-( | 23:59 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 193078 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 "quickcam module will not load in rt kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193078 | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!