[04:15] soren: thats the problem though, its not 2.6.24-8 ... it says http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/admin/xen-image-2.6.19-4-server [04:15] soren: err...i see, different name. [04:16] soren: wonder why the old package is still there too. [04:19] new, http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/base/linux-image-2.6.24-7-xen [04:20] yay! has amd64 support too. [08:25] moin [08:42] hi kraut, do you have any idea why i get module.h not found, even if I have installed the header and source and had my /usr/src/linux pointed to the right kernel source? [08:46] eradicus: did you do a find on the source-tree to find that file? === fabbione is now known as thegodfather [09:03] eradicus: /usr/src/linux is a old-style linux source auto-pointer. Now /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build is used instead. [09:04] check to have linux-headers-generic installed. [09:07] abogani: so i have to redefine /usr/src/linux to point to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ? [09:18] gnargh [09:18] resume from suspend consistently fails on this laptop under hardy [11:18] hi there [11:19] there is a patch for alsa and macbook that was on feisty and was lost during the edgy dev cycle... [11:19] I discussed with crimsun_ about including it again and he is okay on rationale [11:19] here is the patch http://paste.toniox.org/2813 [11:19] it closes bug 87253 [11:19] Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87253 [11:20] sound support on the concernd macbooks is only partial with the current driver (I can confirm the issue, I have one of those macbooks) [11:20] I hope this patch can be included to the current kernel before hardy is released ! [11:44] Tonio_, you might want to reopen that bug (or open a new one) with the patch attached [11:51] JanCG: sure ;) [11:53] Tonio_: just modify the existing bug [11:54] Tonio_: target it to linux-2.6.24, hardy [11:54] I assume you have tested Hardy and it still doesn't work for you? [11:55] amitk: without the patch, no it doesn't work ;) [11:56] Tonio_: any reason why this patch hasn't made it upstream yet? [11:59] amitk: they probably want something more generic that doing depending the dev id [11:59] amitk: I suspect that the "if (codec->revision_id == 0x103401) -> else" isn't very welcomed [11:59] amitk: btw crimsun_ would know more on that point, as it did the patch for feisty [12:02] amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253 [12:02] Launchpad bug 87253 in linux "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,New] [12:03] amitk: I hope I filed it the good way, please lemme know if that's not correct ;) [12:05] Tonio_: looks good [12:10] Tonio_: although, for future reference, you should have left the old package (linux-source-2.6.20) in there and just add a new one for the hardy kernel, to maintain history. [12:11] hum true..... I'll change that [12:16] amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253 [12:16] Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,Fix released] [12:16] amitk: should be okay now === asac_ is now known as asac === juliank0 is now known as juliank === fabbione is now known as thegodfather [16:59] amitk, rtg, smb, king_: ping [16:59] here [16:59] BenC: here [16:59] BenC: yo [17:00] * BenC waits for king and his new super fast cable line to respond [17:02] BenC: my cable is fast - I was just busy! [17:02] hehe [17:03] BenC: ..busy downloading loads of stuff :-) [17:03] Ok, welcome to the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting. As usual, you can find the agenda, as well as past minutes, at this location: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting [17:04] Not much in the way of team status... [17:04] rtg: How about a quick overview of the -9 kernel aimed for Alpha 5, and the state of re-upload? [17:04] the big items in -9 are /dev/mem and /dev/kmem protection. [17:05] working on getting -9 to build, but no upload until after A5. [17:05] also working on some ABI issues raised by Fabio. [17:05] ALSA modules create a different ABI then the kernel. [17:06] linux-meta has some deficcienties that need fixed. [17:06] thats about all for me. [17:06] rtg: This will also get lum pulled freshly, won't it? Cause I had to fixup the dmraid45 [17:06] smb: yep [17:06] rtg: Good:) [17:06] but not until thursday late. [17:07] Alright, sounds like we have everything under control, even if the deadline for upload did get missed [17:07] BenC: back to you... [17:07] rtg: when was -9 uploaded? [17:08] yesterday. [17:08] the first upload [17:08] the linux-headers package was fubar'd. [17:08] Ok, that's part of the reason for missing the A5 freeze...deadline for upload of kernel was Sunday [17:09] the its serendipitous, huh? [17:09] not a problem, but something to watch out for [17:10] Next up, QA bug list for the kernel, which seems to have been knocked out very well since last week [17:11] The only thing I'd comment on right now is we have 11 bugs in the past column that are not assigned to anyone, so we should either close as wont-fix, or one of us pick them up [17:11] Good job on getting things handled from last week though [17:13] Well, other than that, we are pretty much done...anyone want to comment one anything? [17:14] perhaps it is good to announce the patch deadline [17:14] amitk: the patch deadline is rolling, and it's always the day before the kernel upload window starts [17:15] BenC: aah. I misunderstood it then. Nevermind. [17:16] Maybe it would be a good idea to link to the read-only ubuntu-kernel-release-schedule google cal though [17:16] We can add it to the KernelTeam wiki resources [17:16] BenC: Does this mean we should refrain from putting in large patches into the kernel now? [17:17] The kernel freeze itself isn't until March 4th [17:18] but we should take care with whatever patches are going in right now [17:18] Once we hit kernel freeze, we aren't doing anything except major bug fixes [17:18] OK - I am probably going to refrain from putting a large and hairy patch for the broadcom b43 driver then ... [17:19] ..especially as there is a NDIS wrapper solution [17:19] 2.6.24.2 already has a big patch for B43. [17:19] We may have some alternative with regard to b43 [17:20] rtg: And there is another one for a specific revision 02 of a board. I think it should wait [17:20] Ok, if there's nothing further... [17:20] king_: depends. does it help? b43 is largely non-functional from what I can tell. [17:24] Ok, meeting adjourned...have a great week everyone, and thanks for attending === LifeHacker is now known as tuxmaniac [18:01] rtg: Do you mean non-functional in general? If so, I think that's an exaggeration. === smb is now known as smb_away [18:13] The git tag for the 2.6.24-8.13 LUM upload doesn't match what's in the source package. Is that intentional? [18:26] amitk: ^^^^ [19:10] smagoun_: yes. Since the top commit of PPA packages is thrown away when we rebase to latest hardy [19:12] amitk: I'm referring to the Hardy LUM, not the one in the PPA. For example, commit 80b905953dde820e13869e1859427baaa0bba3ba is included in the 2.6.24-8.13 source tarball, but it's not present in the 2.6.24-8.13 tag in the Hardy LUM tree [19:27] smagoun_: rtg probably repushed the 'UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13' commit, thereby nuking the old id. rtg, commit f0b376c9ec128db651d83d9f690af7351d6d2a37 should have the Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13 tag, you need to delete the old tag and create a new one point to this commit. [19:28] *pointing [19:28] * amitk -> dinner === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso === smb_away is now known as smb [19:48] amitk: That clears things up for me. Thanks for the help! [19:53] smagoun_: Hardy LUM tags are corrected. [20:00] rtg: thanks === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara === smb is now known as smb_away [23:57] I'm incredible stupid :-( [23:58] <_MMA_> ? [23:59] _MMA_, Bug #193078... Perhaps too much punches? :-( [23:59] Launchpad bug 193078 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 "quickcam module will not load in rt kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193078