[04:15] <osmosis> soren: thats the problem though, its not 2.6.24-8 ... it says  http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/admin/xen-image-2.6.19-4-server 
[04:15] <osmosis> soren: err...i see, different name.
[04:16] <osmosis> soren: wonder why the old package is still there too.
[04:19] <osmosis> new, http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/base/linux-image-2.6.24-7-xen
[04:20] <osmosis> yay! has amd64 support too.
[08:25] <kraut> moin
[08:42] <eradicus> hi kraut, do you have any idea why i get module.h not found, even if I have installed the header and source and had my /usr/src/linux pointed to the right kernel source?
[08:46] <kraut> eradicus: did you do a find on the source-tree to find that file?
[09:03] <abogani> eradicus: /usr/src/linux is a old-style linux source auto-pointer. Now /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build is used instead.
[09:04] <abogani> check to have linux-headers-generic installed.
[09:07] <eradicus> abogani: so i have to redefine /usr/src/linux to point to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ?
[09:18] <Keybuk> gnargh
[09:18] <Keybuk> resume from suspend consistently fails on this laptop under hardy
[11:18] <Tonio_> hi there
[11:19] <Tonio_> there is a patch for alsa and macbook that was on feisty and was lost during the edgy dev cycle...
[11:19] <Tonio_> I discussed with crimsun_ about including it again and he is okay on rationale
[11:19] <Tonio_> here is the patch http://paste.toniox.org/2813
[11:19] <Tonio_> it closes bug 87253
[11:19] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87253
[11:20] <Tonio_> sound support on the concernd macbooks is only partial with the current driver (I can confirm the issue, I have one of those macbooks)
[11:20] <Tonio_> I hope this patch can be included to the current kernel before hardy is released !
[11:44] <JanCG> Tonio_, you might want to reopen that bug (or open a new one) with the patch attached
[11:51] <Tonio_> JanCG: sure ;)
[11:53] <amitk> Tonio_: just modify the existing bug 
[11:54] <amitk> Tonio_: target it to linux-2.6.24, hardy
[11:54] <amitk> I assume you have tested Hardy and it still doesn't work for you?
[11:55] <Tonio_> amitk: without the patch, no it doesn't work ;)
[11:56] <amitk> Tonio_: any reason why this patch hasn't made it upstream yet?
[11:59] <Tonio_> amitk: they probably want something more generic that doing depending the dev id
[11:59] <Tonio_> amitk: I suspect that the "if (codec->revision_id == 0x103401) -> else" isn't very welcomed
[11:59] <Tonio_> amitk: btw crimsun_ would know more on that point, as it did the patch for feisty
[12:02] <Tonio_> amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253
[12:02] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 87253 in linux "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,New] 
[12:03] <Tonio_> amitk: I hope I filed it the good way, please lemme know if that's not correct ;)
[12:05] <amitk> Tonio_: looks good
[12:10] <amitk> Tonio_: although, for future reference, you should have left the old package (linux-source-2.6.20) in there and just add a new one for the hardy kernel, to maintain history.
[12:11] <Tonio_> hum true..... I'll change that
[12:16] <Tonio_> amitk: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/87253
[12:16] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 87253 in linux-source-2.6.20 "internal speakers do not work on MacBook Pro" [Medium,Fix released] 
[12:16] <Tonio_> amitk: should be okay now
[16:59] <BenC> amitk, rtg, smb, king_: ping
[16:59] <amitk> here
[16:59] <smb> BenC: here
[16:59] <rtg> BenC: yo
[17:00]  * BenC waits for king and his new super fast cable line to respond
[17:02] <king_> BenC: my cable is fast - I was just busy! 
[17:02] <BenC> hehe
[17:03] <king_> BenC: ..busy downloading loads of stuff :-)
[17:03] <BenC> Ok, welcome to the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting. As usual, you can find the agenda, as well as past minutes, at this location: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:04] <BenC> Not much in the way of team status...
[17:04] <BenC> rtg: How about a quick overview of the -9 kernel aimed for Alpha 5, and the state of re-upload?
[17:04] <rtg> the big items in -9 are /dev/mem and /dev/kmem protection.
[17:05] <rtg> working on getting -9 to build, but no upload until after A5.
[17:05] <rtg> also working on some ABI issues raised by Fabio.
[17:05] <rtg> ALSA modules create a different ABI then the kernel.
[17:06] <rtg> linux-meta has some deficcienties that need fixed.
[17:06] <rtg> thats about all for me.
[17:06] <smb> rtg: This will also get lum pulled freshly, won't it? Cause I had to fixup the dmraid45
[17:06] <rtg> smb: yep
[17:06] <smb> rtg: Good:)
[17:06] <rtg> but not until thursday late.
[17:07] <BenC> Alright, sounds like we have everything under control, even if the deadline for upload did get missed
[17:07] <rtg> BenC: back to you...
[17:07] <BenC> rtg: when was -9 uploaded?
[17:08] <rtg> yesterday.
[17:08] <BenC> the first upload
[17:08] <rtg> the linux-headers package was fubar'd.
[17:08] <BenC> Ok, that's part of the reason for missing the A5 freeze...deadline for upload of kernel was Sunday
[17:09] <rtg> the its serendipitous, huh?
[17:09] <BenC> not a problem, but something to watch out for
[17:10] <BenC> Next up, QA bug list for the kernel, which seems to have been knocked out very well since last week
[17:11] <BenC> The only thing I'd comment on right now is we have 11 bugs in the past column that are not assigned to anyone, so we should either close as wont-fix, or one of us pick them up
[17:11] <BenC> Good job on getting things handled from last week though
[17:13] <BenC> Well, other than that, we are pretty much done...anyone want to comment one anything?
[17:14] <amitk> perhaps it is good to announce the patch deadline
[17:14] <BenC> amitk: the patch deadline is rolling, and it's always the day before the kernel upload window starts
[17:15] <amitk> BenC: aah. I misunderstood it then. Nevermind.
[17:16] <BenC> Maybe it would be a good idea to link to the read-only ubuntu-kernel-release-schedule google cal though
[17:16] <BenC> We can add it to the KernelTeam wiki resources
[17:16] <king_> BenC: Does this mean we should refrain from putting in large patches into the kernel now?
[17:17] <BenC> The kernel freeze itself isn't until March 4th
[17:18] <BenC> but we should take care with whatever patches are going in right now
[17:18] <BenC> Once we hit kernel freeze, we aren't doing anything except major bug fixes
[17:18] <king_> OK -  I am probably going to refrain from putting a large and hairy patch for the broadcom b43 driver then ...
[17:19] <king_> ..especially as there is a NDIS wrapper solution
[17:19] <rtg> 2.6.24.2 already has  a big patch for B43.
[17:19] <BenC> We may have some alternative with regard to b43
[17:20] <king_> rtg: And there is another one for a specific revision 02 of a board. I think it should wait
[17:20] <BenC> Ok, if there's nothing further...
[17:20] <rtg> king_: depends. does it help? b43 is largely non-functional from what I can tell.
[17:24] <BenC> Ok, meeting adjourned...have a great week everyone, and thanks for attending
[18:01] <johanbr> rtg: Do you mean non-functional in general? If so, I think that's an exaggeration.
[18:13] <smagoun_> The git tag for the 2.6.24-8.13 LUM upload doesn't match what's in the source package. Is that intentional?
[18:26] <smagoun_> amitk: ^^^^
[19:10] <amitk> smagoun_: yes. Since the top commit of PPA packages is thrown away when we rebase to latest hardy
[19:12] <smagoun_> amitk: I'm referring to the Hardy LUM, not the one in the PPA. For example, commit 80b905953dde820e13869e1859427baaa0bba3ba is included in the 2.6.24-8.13 source tarball, but it's not present in the 2.6.24-8.13 tag in the Hardy LUM tree
[19:27] <amitk> smagoun_: rtg probably repushed the 'UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13' commit, thereby nuking the old id. rtg, commit f0b376c9ec128db651d83d9f690af7351d6d2a37 should have the Ubuntu-2.6.24-8.13 tag, you need to delete the old tag and create a new one point to this commit.
[19:28] <amitk> *pointing
[19:28]  * amitk -> dinner
[19:48] <smagoun_> amitk: That clears things up for me. Thanks for the help!
[19:53] <rtg> smagoun_: Hardy LUM tags are corrected.
[20:00] <smagoun_> rtg: thanks
[23:57] <abogani> I'm incredible stupid :-(
[23:58] <_MMA_> ?
[23:59] <abogani> _MMA_, Bug #193078... Perhaps too much punches? :-(
[23:59] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 193078 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 "quickcam module will not load in rt kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193078