=== kiko is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
=== kiko-zzz is now known as kiko | ||
barry | #startmeeting | 15:00 |
---|---|---|
MootBot | Meeting started at 15:00. The chair is barry. | 15:00 |
MootBot | Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] | 15:00 |
barry | hi everybody, and welcome to this week's ameu reviewer's meeting | 15:00 |
barry | who's here today? | 15:01 |
bigjools | me | 15:01 |
gmb | me | 15:01 |
schwuk | me | 15:01 |
sinzui | me | 15:01 |
BjornT | me | 15:01 |
bac | me | 15:01 |
danilo_ | me | 15:01 |
allenap | me | 15:01 |
=== danilo_ is now known as danilos | ||
barry | [TOPIC] agenda | 15:02 |
MootBot | New Topic: agenda | 15:02 |
intellectronica | me | 15:02 |
barry | == Agenda == | 15:02 |
barry | * Roll call | 15:02 |
barry | * Next meeting | 15:02 |
barry | * Action items | 15:02 |
barry | * Queue status | 15:02 |
barry | * Mentoring update | 15:02 |
barry | * gmb graduates | 15:02 |
barry | * Review process | 15:02 |
barry | [TOPIC] next meeting | 15:02 |
MootBot | New Topic: next meeting | 15:02 |
barry | same time next week? anybody know they won't be able to attend? | 15:03 |
allenap | I won't be here. | 15:03 |
barry | allenap: k, thanks | 15:03 |
allenap | On holiday all week to move house. | 15:03 |
flacoste | me? | 15:03 |
barry | okay, same time next week | 15:04 |
barry | flacoste: hi! :) | 15:04 |
danilos | flacoste: yes, you! | 15:04 |
barry | [TOPIC] * Action items | 15:04 |
MootBot | New Topic: * Action items | 15:04 |
barry | * (continued) intellectronica to put cover letter draft on wiki | 15:04 |
* intellectronica stares at the floor silently | 15:04 | |
intellectronica | carry over - i'll get to it one day :( | 15:04 |
barry | intellectronica: ;) ok | 15:05 |
barry | * (continued) sinzui to look into running `make lint` and output PR stanza by default in `review-submit` | 15:05 |
sinzui | mwhudson accepted by `make lint addition` I have not checked if it is in trunk | 15:05 |
flacoste | output PR stanza by default is still pending? | 15:05 |
sinzui | I have not added the PR stanza by default. I'll submit that one line change next | 15:06 |
barry | sinzui: great. i'll leave this item on the list one more week. sounds like next week we can kill it! | 15:07 |
flacoste | barry: you can edit it though | 15:07 |
barry | flacoste: yes, i'll remove the 'make lint' part | 15:07 |
barry | [TOPIC] queue status | 15:08 |
MootBot | New Topic: queue status | 15:08 |
barry | the queue looks pretty good from where i stand | 15:08 |
barry | the general queue has two 1.2.3 branches | 15:09 |
barry | and only sinzui's branch is over the sla | 15:09 |
sinzui | My branch is really needs-reply | 15:09 |
barry | cool | 15:09 |
* sinzui was replying before the meeting | 15:09 | |
intellectronica | yeah, danilo and i should be able to finish the general queue by the end of today, if no one requests on call reviews | 15:09 |
barry | intellectronica: excellent! | 15:10 |
barry | any other comments on the queue status? | 15:10 |
barry | 5 | 15:11 |
barry | 4 | 15:11 |
sinzui | Should we have a limit to how long a branch can be | 15:11 |
sinzui | in work in progress | 15:11 |
flacoste | 3 days | 15:11 |
flacoste | :-) | 15:11 |
intellectronica | sinzui: and if you're over the limit then what, you have to delete the branch and start from scratch? | 15:11 |
barry | intellectronica: from PR at least :) | 15:11 |
bigjools | guidelines are better than limits | 15:12 |
sinzui | intellectronica: I'm not certain some of these branches are valid | 15:12 |
barry | we should probably at least remove wips from people who are no longer with the company <wink> | 15:12 |
gmb | I think it depends upon how people are actually using the WIP section. | 15:12 |
danilos | I don't see how's that bothering us? | 15:13 |
gmb | When I use it, it's to register that a branch which has been looked at by a reviewer needs more work before it can really be reviewed (i.e. it's been rejected for some reason). | 15:13 |
gmb | Does anyone use it for any other reason? For example, does anyone track every branch through WIP? | 15:13 |
barry | i use it just to get pending-reviews to start tracking it | 15:13 |
intellectronica | gmb: same. i never put a branch there until it's already entered the review process | 15:13 |
danilos | gmb: it used to be a recommended practice to do that | 15:13 |
sinzui | gmb: I have used it when I had to rethink a branch when the first review required a reimplementation | 15:14 |
gmb | sinzui: Yes, I've encountered that situation too. | 15:14 |
danilos | for the reason barry mentioned (put it on pending-reviews, get more visibility to a branch, etc.) | 15:14 |
gmb | danilos: Well, that's okay, but does anyone here actually look at WIP regularly? It's not on my radar. | 15:14 |
barry | gmb: i don't, and i don't think it /needs/ to be, except for the occasionally culling by the dev, or maybe in general to remove ex-employee branches | 15:15 |
barry | [ACTION] barry will cull ex-employee branches from wip | 15:15 |
MootBot | ACTION received: barry will cull ex-employee branches from wip | 15:15 |
BjornT | i do look at wip branches | 15:16 |
barry | BjornT: you mean you look at the diffs? | 15:16 |
BjornT | barry: yeah. to see that the implementation approach is sane. | 15:17 |
BjornT | i don't do it that frequently, but it happens. | 15:18 |
barry | BjornT: do you usually have contact with the dev first, to get some context for the branch? | 15:18 |
barry | does anybody think we need to do more about wip? | 15:19 |
BjornT | barry: it depends. i usually contact the developer, since the branch might not be on pending-reviews, or it might not be up-to-date | 15:20 |
salgado | me! | 15:20 |
barry | salgado: hi! | 15:20 |
barry | anything more about wip branches? | 15:20 |
barry | or the queue in general? | 15:20 |
BjornT | well, speaking of wip branches | 15:21 |
BjornT | i wouldn't mind if there was an easy way of looking at current diffs. i don't think PendingReviews is the way to go, though; i rarely add my branches there, since i'm too lazy | 15:21 |
danilos | BjornT: do it for all branches in /code/*/launchpad/*? | 15:22 |
gmb | That's a looooot of branches. | 15:22 |
danilos | i.e. show diffs for them, having developers move them out once they land | 15:22 |
barry | danilos: but devs would have to be more diligent about clearing out devpad (which i don't do very often) | 15:22 |
danilos | barry: I don't either, but I know some who do (like jtv :)) | 15:23 |
danilos | it shouldn't be too hard to do a 'mv branch archive/' once you land something, imo | 15:23 |
* barry only does it when there's a naming conflict with one of his old branches ;) | 15:23 | |
BjornT | danilos: no. i'd rather have some meta-data to track which branches are wip | 15:23 |
gmb | barry: push --overwrite ;) | 15:23 |
barry | gmb: yay! | 15:24 |
danilos | BjornT: people will still be lazy to update meta-data | 15:24 |
BjornT | danilos: not if it's done pretty much automatically :) | 15:24 |
danilos | BjornT: I guess you have some idea about how that would work then | 15:25 |
BjornT | for example. when a branch is created, it's wip. when it's submitted for review, it's needs-review. | 15:25 |
salgado | all branches could be considered wip until you review-submit them | 15:25 |
bigjools | flipping a state from wip to needs-review would be nice | 15:25 |
danilos | that's meta-data saying that a branch is _not_ wip :0 | 15:26 |
danilos | s/0/)/ | 15:26 |
barry | well, unless there's a specific proposal, maybe we should move on? | 15:27 |
barry | 5 | 15:28 |
barry | 4 | 15:28 |
barry | 3 | 15:28 |
barry | 2 | 15:28 |
barry | 1 | 15:28 |
barry | [TOPIC] mentoring update | 15:28 |
MootBot | New Topic: mentoring update | 15:28 |
barry | * gmb graduates | 15:28 |
barry | yay, gmb! | 15:28 |
* flacoste cheers | 15:28 | |
gmb | \0/ | 15:28 |
intellectronica | excellent | 15:28 |
bigjools | well done | 15:28 |
intellectronica | gmb: do you keep the same review shift? | 15:28 |
allenap | hurrah! | 15:29 |
salgado | intellectronica, good question | 15:29 |
salgado | gmb, I think one of us should change the shift | 15:29 |
gmb | salgado: I agree. | 15:29 |
salgado | since always when we were doing the same shift I was mostly mentoring your reviews and there as nothing else for me to review | 15:30 |
gmb | Actually, we've got pretty good coverage on most days. Hmm. | 15:30 |
gmb | salgado: I'll change shift. I think it's better that you stay on on Thursdays. | 15:30 |
bigjools | we need more on-call euro reviewers monday, tuesday and Friday for Europe AM | 15:30 |
salgado | if that's the case I guess we could both stay on Thusday... | 15:30 |
* flacoste votes for friday | 15:31 | |
danilos | yeah, before sinzui arrives on Friday :) | 15:31 |
bigjools | monday only has barry PM | 15:31 |
flacoste | yeah, but nothign is left on monday :-) | 15:31 |
bigjools | lol | 15:31 |
gmb | I'll happily take Friday if that's okay with sinzui. | 15:31 |
flacoste | and nobody is ever rushed to get something reviewed on monday | 15:31 |
barry | gmb: i'd love to get another monday asiapac or eu slot at least to cover for us holidays, which tend to be on monday | 15:31 |
sinzui | flacoste: I leave branches that are over 800 lines for barry | 15:31 |
gmb | barry: Monday's good for me too. | 15:31 |
barry | sinzui: :) | 15:31 |
sinzui | gmb: \o/ | 15:32 |
gmb | barry: I'll leave the choice to you; you're best placed to know where I'd be more useful. | 15:32 |
barry | sinzui: you gotta stop working weekends, man! | 15:32 |
sinzui | barry: ...and do what, crosswords? | 15:32 |
* sinzui hacked on his editor on the weekend | 15:32 | |
barry | gmb: let's try mondays and see how it goes. it's easy to switch | 15:32 |
intellectronica | sinzui: i hear gedit development is stalled since you started doing review shifts ;) | 15:32 |
gmb | barry: Okay. I'll update the OCR page. | 15:33 |
barry | gmb: thanks! though i think it's gonna be a while before the next us holiday (easter maybe?) | 15:33 |
barry | [ACTION] gmb to take eu monday OCR slot | 15:34 |
MootBot | ACTION received: gmb to take eu monday OCR slot | 15:34 |
barry | [TOPIC] review process | 15:34 |
MootBot | New Topic: review process | 15:34 |
barry | well, i really have nothing here. anybody have any further comments or observations? | 15:34 |
flacoste | our review team tocks! | 15:35 |
gmb | And ticks | 15:35 |
flacoste | rocks even! | 15:35 |
barry | indeed! | 15:35 |
flacoste | big round of applause for the team! | 15:35 |
* barry claps | 15:36 | |
bac | hurrah | 15:36 |
flacoste | not golf applause barry: footban hooligans style please! | 15:36 |
* barry slams his hands raw and screams his voice hoarse | 15:37 | |
* flacoste rocks the casbah | 15:37 | |
* barry ignores the concerned look from his cat | 15:37 | |
* sinzui just bangs the rocks together. | 15:37 | |
* bigjools sings songs about the referee being a wanker | 15:37 | |
barry | :) | 15:37 |
* barry thinks this meeting might be over | 15:38 | |
barry | anything else? | 15:38 |
barry | 5 | 15:38 |
barry | 4 | 15:38 |
barry | 3 | 15:38 |
danilos | 3 | 15:38 |
danilos | 2 | 15:38 |
danilos | 1 | 15:38 |
danilos | :) | 15:39 |
barry | #endmeeting | 15:39 |
MootBot | Meeting finished at 15:39. | 15:39 |
bigjools | thanks barry | 15:39 |
intellectronica | thanks barry | 15:39 |
barry | yay, thanks everyone... especially danilos :) | 15:39 |
danilos | thanks guys, especially barry :) | 15:39 |
kiko | ciao | 15:39 |
barry | see ya | 15:39 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!