| asac | bug 192906 | 09:13 |
|---|---|---|
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 192906 in firefox-3.0 "use gnome's HTML icon for pages without a favicon" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192906 | 09:13 |
| [reed] | [03:35:30AM] <[reed]> monreal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/192906 <-- agree, disagree? | 09:36 |
| [reed] | [03:36:05AM] <monreal> [reed]: disagree... it's not possible anyway | 09:36 |
| [reed] | [03:36:20AM] <monreal> we cannot depend on icons from gnome icon theme | 09:36 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 192906 in firefox-3.0 "use gnome's HTML icon for pages without a favicon" [Wishlist,Triaged] | 09:36 |
| [reed] | there you go | 09:36 |
| asac | [reed]: we can have a fallback? | 09:37 |
| [reed] | I don't think that's possible yet | 09:37 |
| [reed] | due to how stock icons work | 09:37 |
| [reed] | hmm | 09:37 |
| [reed] | but maybe | 09:37 |
| asac | maybe currenty the icon is hard coded, but why can't one use gnomestrip mechanism for it? | 09:38 |
| [reed] | [03:37:01AM] <monreal> [reed]: but we will probably have to redo and include a similar icon | 09:39 |
| [reed] | yeah, so we can include it directly | 09:39 |
| [reed] | as part of gnomestripe | 09:39 |
| [reed] | just can't use a stock icon | 09:39 |
| [reed] | via libpr0n | 09:39 |
| [reed] | and moz-icon:// | 09:39 |
| asac | [reed]: why can't we use moz-icon? | 09:42 |
| asac | does it just work for gtk stock icons? | 09:42 |
| [reed] | it works for gnome icons, too, but we don't require that the user have gnome installed, so we can't depend on those always being available | 09:43 |
| asac | [reed]: yes, but thats the case for other icons as well afaik | 09:43 |
| asac | in beta 2 it falled back to the winstripe theme afaict | 09:43 |
| [reed] | ? | 09:43 |
| [reed] | no | 09:43 |
| [reed] | there's no fallback mechanism in place | 09:43 |
| [reed] | for moz-icon | 09:44 |
| [reed] | it will just fail | 09:44 |
| asac | hmm ... wierd. so how does it work on kde? | 09:44 |
| asac | i think on kde we still see the "old" icons | 09:44 |
| [reed] | really? | 09:45 |
| [reed] | I don't think so | 09:45 |
| [reed] | I don't see how that's possible ;) | 09:45 |
| asac | it falls back to winstripe if gnomeui isn't installed ;) | 09:45 |
| asac | but i think i should verify that again | 09:45 |
| [reed] | please do | 09:46 |
| [reed] | heh | 09:46 |
| asac | Ubulette: ^^^ | 09:55 |
| asac | darn i have a ubuntu developer week classroom session in 6 hours or so | 10:06 |
| asac | @time | 10:06 |
| ubotu | Current time in Etc/UTC: February 21 2008, 10:06:40 - Next meeting: Desktop Team in 3 hours 53 minutes | 10:06 |
| asac | completely forgot | 10:06 |
| asac | ;) | 10:06 |
| [reed] | what is that? | 10:08 |
| asac | [reed]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek | 10:09 |
| [reed] | ah | 10:10 |
| [reed] | cool | 10:10 |
| [reed] | asac: sounds easy | 10:13 |
| [reed] | you'll do fine | 10:13 |
| [reed] | :) | 10:13 |
| asac | haha | 10:14 |
| asac | my problem is that i don't really know what to expect | 10:14 |
| asac | how many will come? will they ask questions? or should i just teach | 10:14 |
| asac | how to present my knowledge in a chat room :) | 10:14 |
| [reed] | hehe | 10:14 |
| asac | Ubulette: there? | 11:16 |
| asac | Ubulette: what do you think about the xpi.mk i recently added | 11:16 |
| asac | to mozilla-devscripts | 11:16 |
| armin76 | bad | 11:32 |
| asac | Ubulette: i will upload new mozilla-devscripts to mozillateam ppa (appending ~mt1) as i want it in todays ffox 2 extension packaging session | 12:37 |
| asac | Ubulette: please veto in the next 20 minutes if you want to do a prerelease to your ppa | 12:37 |
| asac | (i have just committed more on top of your last fix for xpi.mk" | 12:37 |
| asac | ) | 12:37 |
| asac | Ubulette: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/XPI.TEMPLATE | 12:40 |
| asac | Ubulette: ok from my side we are now ready for release of mozilla-devscripts | 13:51 |
| asac | we should use the card blanche to justify this ff exception breakage | 13:52 |
| asac | lets wait till weekend with upload i would say | 13:52 |
| asac | i uploaded to my ppa now | 13:52 |
| asac | Ubulette: i have drafted https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions/Packaging ... maybe take a look if its at least a bit comprehensible | 13:53 |
| asac | @time | 13:58 |
| ubotu | Current time in Etc/UTC: February 21 2008, 13:58:21 - Current meeting: Desktop Team | 13:58 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | bug 432322 | 15:13 |
| asac | debian bug 432322 | 15:13 |
| ubotu | Debian bug 432322 in network-manager "network-manager: package upgrade kills network connections every time" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/432322 | 15:13 |
| armin76 | @time | 15:30 |
| ubotu | Current time in Etc/UTC: February 21 2008, 15:30:41 - Next meeting: Community Council in 4 hours 29 minutes | 15:30 |
| asac | @time | 15:55 |
| ubotu | Current time in Etc/UTC: February 21 2008, 15:55:27 - Next meeting: Community Council in 4 hours 4 minutes | 15:55 |
| jetsaredim | asac: I think adding firebug and mouse gestures extensions would be great | 17:00 |
| asac | jetsaredim: yep ... the procedure is simple. add the extension to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions | 17:01 |
| jetsaredim | is it standard procedure to contact the maintainers first before going about this | 17:01 |
| asac | and gather the required information. then you can adopt that extension if you want and package it like just taught | 17:01 |
| asac | jetsaredim: if there is an obvious good contact available, its not required | 17:01 |
| asac | point is that we want to know how to contact them ... so if they don't have an active mailing list at least verifying that they reply would be good | 17:02 |
| asac | for the most popular extesnions that are frequently updated, we most likely don't need that | 17:02 |
| asac | just fill in the contact you find | 17:02 |
| asac | jetsaredim: if you want an extension to be sponsored, please try to use the procedure https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions/Packaging | 17:03 |
| asac | if there are problems i am alwayshere to help! | 17:03 |
| asac | (well not always, but usually) | 17:03 |
| jetsaredim | ok | 17:03 |
| jetsaredim | heh | 17:03 |
| asac | db-keen: phoenix24: kyleN: did you manage to finish the second practice round? | 17:04 |
| phoenix24 | Yes! | 17:04 |
| asac | if you manage to create a launchpad branch, just let me know, i can review it then | 17:04 |
| asac | :) | 17:04 |
| kyleN | asac. in unbuntu mobile weekly meeting, enjoyed what I saw of your talk though. | 17:04 |
| phoenix24 | ok! | 17:04 |
| asac | kyleN: thanks! | 17:05 |
| phoenix24 | asac: could we target any extensions.. ranging to all those existing ? | 17:06 |
| asac | yes ... i would like to get 100 extensions for hardy :) ... which is of course too high a goal to reach for hardy | 17:07 |
| asac | but you get the point | 17:07 |
| asac | but we should definitly try to cover all most important ones | 17:07 |
| asac | a good start is: the top 50 projects on mozdev: | 17:07 |
| asac | http://www.mozdev.org/projects/top50.html | 17:07 |
| asac | (not all are extensions, but at least mozdev projects usually have a CVS and a license :)) | 17:07 |
| asac | or the top list of addons.mozilla.org | 17:08 |
| asac | but careful: on addons.mozilla.org its not given that the extensions have a free license | 17:08 |
| phoenix24 | thanks a lot! looking forward to it! | 17:09 |
| asac | if we cannot find how things are licensed we should go on or if we consider the extension important enough ask the developers | 17:09 |
| asac | phoenix24: me too ;) | 17:09 |
| armin76 | ricer :P | 17:10 |
| phoenix24 | Can I get the Firefox3 source code from the launchpad itself ? | 17:20 |
| asac | phoenix24: unforatuntely not yet | 17:21 |
| asac | phoenix24: well the packaging code is in launchpad | 17:23 |
| phoenix24 | ah! yes | 17:27 |
| asac | i will be out travelling for ~3 hours from now. maybe ask Ubulette_ if he is available(not sure) in the meantime. | 17:27 |
| asac | he should know all about firefox-3 and xulrunner-1.9 packaging ;) | 17:27 |
| * asac off for a while | 17:29 | |
| phoenix24 | later asac! | 17:30 |
| === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
| Ubulette | hi | 18:48 |
| Ubulette | asac, got my email ? | 18:48 |
| [reed] | asac / Ubulette: system sqlite3 coming up today | 18:58 |
| [reed] | :) | 18:58 |
| Ubulette | nice | 19:00 |
| Ubulette | [reed], bug id ? | 19:10 |
| [reed] | mozilla bug 263381 | 19:10 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 263381 in Storage "support --with-system-sqlite3 in storage builds" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263381 | 19:11 |
| Ubulette | [reed], you can subscribe me to those kind of bugs. don't hesitate :) | 19:13 |
| [reed] | hehe | 19:13 |
| [reed] | k | 19:13 |
| armin76 | :( | 19:43 |
| armin76 | [reed]: why don't you like me? :P | 19:43 |
| [reed] | armin76: sad? | 19:43 |
| [reed] | lol | 19:43 |
| [reed] | well, I can cc you, too! | 19:43 |
| armin76 | you never poke me about that cool stuff! :P | 19:43 |
| Ubulette | armin76, do you package trunk ? | 19:43 |
| armin76 | yeah | 19:44 |
| armin76 | when the betas are older yes | 19:44 |
| armin76 | or when some bug gets fixed | 19:44 |
| Ubulette | oh, ok. thought you only do releases | 19:44 |
| Yasumoto | heya asac, just wanted to let you know that I read through the transcript of your talk, and it was really helpful | 19:46 |
| Yasumoto | I'm going to give it a try later today, so I'll let you know how everything goes | 19:47 |
| Ubulette | Yasumoto, great. Which extension(s) do you plan to do ? | 20:13 |
| jetsaredim | I'd like to work on getting the firebug extension updated | 20:27 |
| jetsaredim | should I just add the entry to the FF3Extensions page? | 20:27 |
| Ubulette | yes, it's a start :) | 20:28 |
| jetsaredim | i don't have one of those nifty @ubuntu.com email addresses, but whatever | 20:31 |
| jetsaredim | can someone explain how to do the bzr push described in the tutorial? | 20:48 |
| Ubulette | sure. is your local bzr branch ready ? | 20:51 |
| Yasumoto | Ubulette: probably things like google reader notifier, fireftp | 20:51 |
| Yasumoto | a few other cool ones (I'll have to find out once I see what's in the repos already) | 20:51 |
| jetsaredim | Ubulette: no - just doing the initial import of upstream | 20:52 |
| Ubulette | Yasumoto, start with one, then move on. btw, if you do google reader notifier, would be nice to have it working for prism too | 20:53 |
| jetsaredim | Ubulette: basically I think I need to set my launchpad login info somewhere so that it doesn't try to use my linux username | 20:54 |
| Ubulette | jetsaredim, if you've committed that initial release, it's already possible to push it. | 20:54 |
| Ubulette | bzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~$LAUNCHPAD_ID/firefox-extensions/$EXTENSIONNAME.ubuntu | 20:54 |
| Ubulette | in my case, it would be: | 20:55 |
| jetsaredim | bzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jetsaredim/firefox-extensions/firebug.upstream | 20:55 |
| Ubulette | yes | 20:55 |
| Ubulette | does it work | 20:55 |
| Ubulette | ? | 20:55 |
| jetsaredim | fai | 20:56 |
| jetsaredim | l | 20:56 |
| jetsaredim | http://dpaste.com/36326/ | 20:56 |
| Ubulette | do you have a launchpad account ? | 20:57 |
| jetsaredim | yea | 20:57 |
| jetsaredim | https://edge.launchpad.net/~jetsaredim | 20:57 |
| jetsaredim | should I change my handle to match my linux login | 20:57 |
| Ubulette | try with: bzr push bzr+ssh://jetsaredim@bazaar.launchpad.net/~jetsaredim/firefox-extensions/firebug.upstream | 20:59 |
| jetsaredim | its thinking about it | 21:00 |
| jetsaredim | yay | 21:00 |
| jetsaredim | workie | 21:00 |
| Ubulette | good. the tutorial needs to be fixed | 21:01 |
| jetsaredim | you want I should fix it? | 21:01 |
| jetsaredim | bzr push bzr+ssh://$LAUNCHPAD_ID@bazaar.launchpad.net/~$LAUNCHPAD_ID/firefox-extensions/$EXTENSIONNAME.upstream | 21:01 |
| Ubulette | just did it | 21:02 |
| jetsaredim | all of the other commands seem to work fine | 21:02 |
| jetsaredim | i had the edit lock - but you can try again now tho | 21:02 |
| jetsaredim | :) | 21:02 |
| jetsaredim | there | 21:02 |
| Ubulette | ok | 21:03 |
| Ubulette | we also need to add the version of each license. that's kind of mandatory now | 21:04 |
| Ubulette | i'll discuss that with asac when he's back | 21:04 |
| jetsaredim | do I need to wrap the long description part of the control file to 80 cols? | 21:08 |
| Ubulette | yes | 21:08 |
| Ubulette | and add a space after each newline | 21:09 |
| Ubulette | [reed], do you plan to commit the system sqlite3 patch today ? | 21:12 |
| [reed] | yes | 21:12 |
| jetsaredim | is there an example of a copyright file that I can take a look at? | 21:16 |
| jetsaredim | er debian/copyright | 21:16 |
| Ubulette | take an extension already in | 21:17 |
| Ubulette | for ex mozilla-noscript | 21:19 |
| Ubulette | http://paste.ubuntu.com/4875/ | 21:20 |
| jetsaredim | Ubulette: ok - i uploaded the code with the debian dir added | 21:34 |
| jetsaredim | but I seem to be having a build problem | 21:34 |
| Ubulette | logs ? | 21:36 |
| jetsaredim | err - lemmie dpaste | 21:36 |
| jetsaredim | http://dpaste.com/36336/ | 21:37 |
| jetsaredim | err you can ignore the junk at the top | 21:38 |
| jetsaredim | I had uncommented the MOZ_XPI_FILE in rules | 21:38 |
| jetsaredim | maybe that was not a good idea | 21:38 |
| jetsaredim | (get a different build error with MOZ_XPI_FILE commented out) | 21:39 |
| jetsaredim | maybe because the actual build of the xpi is copying the resultant xpi file to the dist directory | 21:42 |
| Ubulette | is firebug.xpi built somewhere ? | 21:44 |
| jetsaredim | i think I need to comment that out | 21:44 |
| jetsaredim | cause what is happening is that the build of the xpi is copying the xpi to dist | 21:44 |
| jetsaredim | and the xpi is actually called firebug-1.1.0b12.zpi | 21:44 |
| jetsaredim | err xpi | 21:44 |
| Ubulette | well, the result is supposed to be firebug.xpi according to the makexpi script | 21:45 |
| jetsaredim | hmm | 21:45 |
| jetsaredim | ok - i fixed the name part | 21:49 |
| jetsaredim | but still - its not finding the xpi in the dist dir | 21:49 |
| Ubulette | hold on, i'll try in a few minutes (i'm finishing something) | 21:50 |
| jetsaredim | i think i'm figuring out how to modify the build.xml ant file | 21:50 |
| jetsaredim | err | 21:52 |
| jetsaredim | also | 21:52 |
| jetsaredim | shouldn't this package be called mozilla-firefox-firebug? | 21:52 |
| Ubulette | no | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | we've stopped that | 21:53 |
| jetsaredim | ok - just going by the adblock thingie | 21:53 |
| jetsaredim | do you know if its possible to sign a gpg key with more than one email address? | 21:53 |
| Ubulette | in debian/changelog, you need to change the package name too | 21:54 |
| jetsaredim | yea - just fixed that too | 21:54 |
| Ubulette | and the version | 21:54 |
| jetsaredim | yep | 21:54 |
| Ubulette | and your name/email ;) | 21:54 |
| jetsaredim | i just got it working except for signing it | 21:54 |
| jetsaredim | lemmie commit it | 21:56 |
| jetsaredim | ok - committed | 21:57 |
| jetsaredim | i just have to figure out how to sign it | 21:57 |
| Ubulette | sign it ? | 21:59 |
| Ubulette | btw, it seems you've added the svn dirs in the bzr source branch, you shouldn't | 22:00 |
| jetsaredim | ? | 22:01 |
| jetsaredim | ah | 22:01 |
| jetsaredim | good call | 22:02 |
| jetsaredim | done | 22:02 |
| Ubulette | please check your xpi with unzip -v *.xpi for unwanted files | 22:03 |
| jetsaredim | http://dpaste.com/36343/ | 22:05 |
| jetsaredim | (looks good to me) | 22:05 |
| Ubulette | yes | 22:05 |
| jetsaredim | so, now what? | 22:06 |
| Ubulette | run lintian on the .changes file | 22:08 |
| jetsaredim | bunch of "in the future" messages | 22:10 |
| Ubulette | it should be silent | 22:12 |
| jetsaredim | what about the release name in the changelog - should I just put hardy or something | 22:13 |
| Ubulette | hardy instead of UNRELEASED | 22:16 |
| jetsaredim | how do i update that changes file so that these get cleared | 22:16 |
| Ubulette | rebuild | 22:16 |
| jetsaredim | E: firebug_1.1.0b12_i386.changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file hardy | 22:18 |
| jetsaredim | ? | 22:18 |
| Ubulette | your lintian doesn't know hardy ? hm, ok, doesn't matter | 22:20 |
| Ubulette | btw, don't use 1.0b12 | 22:21 |
| Ubulette | use 1.0~b12 | 22:21 |
| Ubulette | because 1.0b12 > 1.0 | 22:21 |
| jetsaredim | um - was just using the version from upstream | 22:21 |
| jetsaredim | ah | 22:21 |
| jetsaredim | good point | 22:21 |
| Ubulette | while 1.0~b12 < 1.0 | 22:21 |
| Ubulette | i mean use 1.1.0~b12 | 22:22 |
| jetsaredim | right | 22:22 |
| asac | jetsaredim: back | 22:23 |
| jetsaredim | um hi | 22:24 |
| asac | Yasumoto: great | 22:24 |
| asac | hi | 22:25 |
| Ubulette | asac, hi | 22:25 |
| jetsaredim | still getting the same lintian errors | 22:25 |
| Ubulette | paste | 22:26 |
| jetsaredim | http://dpaste.com/36348/ | 22:26 |
| asac | Ubulette: hey. read your mail | 22:26 |
| asac | Ubulette: is the altest version ok? or do you have more suggestsions? | 22:26 |
| Ubulette | asac, for sure, you need to update the README file, it's the doc :P | 22:27 |
| asac | jetsaredim: the distribution thing doesn't matter | 22:27 |
| asac | what version do you have? | 22:27 |
| asac | afaik, lintian will only complain about hardy if you don't use an ubuntu package revision. | 22:27 |
| asac | e.g. instead of 1.0-1 use 1.0-0ubuntu1 | 22:27 |
| asac | i think that should fix the lintian error | 22:28 |
| jetsaredim | o ok | 22:28 |
| Ubulette | oh, yeah, forgot that :P | 22:28 |
| Ubulette | go for 1.1.0~b12-0ubuntu1 | 22:28 |
| jetsaredim | so - i should change it to 1.1.0-b12ubuntu1 | 22:28 |
| Ubulette | nope | 22:28 |
| asac | jetsaredim: use Ubulette's suggestion (if its a preview release of 1.0) | 22:29 |
| asac | is that a beta? or is that a release that happened after 1.1.0? like a 12th build? | 22:29 |
| Ubulette | 1.1.0~b12-0ubuntu1 as in 1.1.0~b12 from upstream and 0ubuntu1 as debian/ubuntu revision | 22:29 |
| asac | Ubulette: depends on what b means ;) ... haven't read the backlog | 22:29 |
| jetsaredim | yea got it | 22:29 |
| asac | if its 1.1.0 build 12 then 1.1.0+b12-0ubuntu1 would be good as well | 22:30 |
| jetsaredim | not sure | 22:30 |
| jetsaredim | i think its beta | 22:30 |
| Ubulette | i assumed b = beta but i didn't check | 22:30 |
| jetsaredim | damn - gotta go have dinner | 22:30 |
| jetsaredim | you guys on later? | 22:31 |
| asac | jetsaredim: ok if its beta then use tilde | 22:31 |
| asac | jetsaredim: most likely ;) | 22:31 |
| asac | but not sure | 22:31 |
| asac | Ubulette: yes i need to fix README | 22:31 |
| jetsaredim | wait - so 1.1.0~b12-0ubuntu1 | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | same here, i'm tired. I'll be there tomorrow | 22:31 |
| asac | Ubulette: i just forgt | 22:31 |
| asac | jetsaredim: yes | 22:31 |
| Ubulette | asac, is it still possible to have cairo 1.5.10 in hardy or is it too late ? | 22:33 |
| asac | Ubulette: we will get 1.6 final in the end | 22:33 |
| Ubulette | hopefully | 22:34 |
| asac | Ubulette: sync with seb ... otherwise you will be unhappy again ;) ... ask him if he has other patches to apply | 22:34 |
| jetsaredim | ok - still a bunch of those date errors from lintian, but all in all ok | 22:34 |
| asac | jetsaredim: you can fix the dates by running | 22:34 |
| asac | dch -r | 22:34 |
| asac | right before release | 22:34 |
| asac | that will update the date to _now_ | 22:34 |
| jetsaredim | er ok | 22:35 |
| jetsaredim | so those can be ignored for now? | 22:35 |
| asac | and will replace the changelog entry name+mail with what you have setup | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | those dates come from a tar made on a different box either with a drifted clock or from a different timezome | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | timezone | 22:35 |
| asac | ah ok | 22:35 |
| jetsaredim | ok - i have to run - i'll check back later tonight or tomorrow | 22:35 |
| asac | unless the server is completely off you can most likely just wait a few hours to disappear | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | i'd say you can ignore those | 22:35 |
| Ubulette | jetsaredim, try the same with linda instead of lintian | 22:36 |
| Ubulette | usually, you'd want to make both happy if possible | 22:37 |
| asac | Ubulette: i scrolled up and saw that you found an error on the Packaging page | 22:37 |
| asac | ? | 22:37 |
| Ubulette | yes, the bzr push. you forgot the user@ part | 22:37 |
| Ubulette | without it, it fails if the local login is not the same as the lp login | 22:38 |
| asac | right | 22:38 |
| asac | have you fixed it? | 22:38 |
| Ubulette | yes | 22:38 |
| asac | great! | 22:39 |
| Ubulette | you should also update the license part. you must specify versions now | 22:41 |
| Ubulette | GPL is no longer enough | 22:42 |
| jetsaredim | asac: linda reports no errors | 22:46 |
| Ubulette | so it sounds good :) | 22:47 |
| Ubulette | and does it work ? | 22:47 |
| jetsaredim | that would be a good test, wouldn't it | 22:47 |
| jetsaredim | i gotta uninstall it from my browser | 22:48 |
| jetsaredim | maybe I'll try that ppa setup so i can install it from there | 22:48 |
| Ubulette | just dpkg -i the deb you've produced | 22:49 |
| Ubulette | asac, you should make the addons.m.o ids real urls instead of just numbers. (in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions) | 22:50 |
| Ubulette | doing it | 22:53 |
| jetsaredim | Ubulette: install works, but in the addons dialog the version number is listed as 1.1.0b11 | 22:53 |
| jetsaredim | not sure what it was before | 22:53 |
| asac | jetsaredim: thats ok ... the addons dialog shows a version that upstream used. mozilla has adifferent versioning scheme | 22:54 |
| asac | then ubuntu. thus the difference | 22:54 |
| asac | s/then/than/ | 22:54 |
| Ubulette | install.rdf says 1.1.0b11 so it matches | 22:54 |
| jetsaredim | right - but should the ubuntu pkg match the version displayed in the addons dialog | 22:54 |
| jetsaredim | ok | 22:54 |
| Ubulette | but it's weird IMHO | 22:54 |
| jetsaredim | the version number in the build is b12 | 22:55 |
| jetsaredim | meaning when you build the unmodified source it names the xpi as firebug-1.1.0b12 | 22:55 |
| asac | jetsaredim: so whats the package version (in changelog) and what is the version displayed in addons dialog? | 22:56 |
| Ubulette | b12 and b11 | 22:56 |
| jetsaredim | respectively | 22:57 |
| asac | jetsaredim: do you have firebug installed in your profile? | 23:01 |
| asac | is "uninstall" button enabled in addons dialog? | 23:01 |
| asac | if so uninstall ;) | 23:01 |
| asac | otherwise you won'T see the global package. the user profile wins afaik | 23:01 |
| jetsaredim | i had it installed | 23:01 |
| asac | regarless of version order | 23:01 |
| jetsaredim | and uninstalled it | 23:01 |
| asac | so you cannot "uninstall" now? | 23:01 |
| jetsaredim | then i installed the deb | 23:01 |
| asac | yeah | 23:01 |
| jetsaredim | but that didn't allow for uninstall | 23:01 |
| asac | and now there is still the wrong version? | 23:02 |
| asac | yes thats correct | 23:02 |
| Ubulette | asac, that's expected, in the xpi, install.rdf says b11 | 23:02 |
| asac | yes thats right then | 23:02 |
| asac | so why did you use b12 as package namein first place? | 23:03 |
| Ubulette | only debian/changelogs says it's b12 | 23:03 |
| asac | jetsaredim: ^^^ | 23:03 |
| asac | ? | 23:03 |
| Ubulette | it looks like it's the svn tree so maybe upstream bump install.rdf at release time | 23:04 |
| Ubulette | (pure speculation) | 23:04 |
| asac | oh ... good bye ;) | 23:05 |
| Ubulette | asac, could we have an extension wish list in the wiki ? | 23:06 |
| asac | Ubulette: i thought Firefox3Extensions page should be a good start. those that don't have the ubuntu contact can be considered a wish | 23:06 |
| asac | what do you think? | 23:07 |
| asac | i would like wishlist people to at least dig the most important info bug | 23:07 |
| asac | s/bug/up/ | 23:07 |
| asac | Ubulette: we could also just ask them to fill in the data on that page and file a bug against the firefox-extensions project | 23:08 |
| asac | ideas? | 23:09 |
| Ubulette | I'd go for the wiki | 23:09 |
| asac | just wiki? bugs can be better used for discussion | 23:10 |
| asac | or doesn't that matter in practice? | 23:10 |
| asac | i mean we could ack ready packages directly in the bug and initial package upload could close that bug | 23:10 |
| Ubulette | with bugs, we get emails (tons of), with wiki,nada | 23:11 |
| asac | hehe | 23:11 |
| asac | does it make a difference? | 23:11 |
| asac | if you don't want emails just sort them to =most-rarely-read :) | 23:11 |
| Ubulette | wiki only could be easily missed | 23:11 |
| asac | right. and we probably want a bug anyway ... first[needs packaging] ... then [sponsoring] | 23:12 |
| asac | the main idea about the wiki page for me was to have most important information compressed on one page | 23:13 |
| asac | would could add another row for a tracking bug | 23:13 |
| asac | if you have a wish, you just add the [needs packaging] bug | 23:13 |
| asac | if you want to package you add a "package intent" bug that becomes a "needs sponsor" bug once you have finished your work | 23:14 |
| asac | no idea if thats too much overhead | 23:15 |
| asac | and might distract from the real task ;) | 23:15 |
| asac | jetsaredim: welcome back :) | 23:16 |
| asac | damn netsplit | 23:16 |
| jetsaredim | i will have to reinstall the original package to check that the version mismatch was there originally | 23:17 |
| jetsaredim | ok - reinstalled the original and the addons dialog says b12 | 23:17 |
| jetsaredim | only thing i can think of is that the source tree is not updated | 23:17 |
| jetsaredim | i can just patch the install.rdf file | 23:17 |
| asac | jetsaredim: what is the original package? | 23:18 |
| jetsaredim | the other possibility is that the version being served up is different than the source tree | 23:18 |
| asac | (sorry, i lack some context here i guess) | 23:18 |
| Ubulette | gone | 23:21 |
| Ubulette | maybe i'd do rikaichan that I use a lot: http://www.polarcloud.com/rikaichan/ | 23:21 |
| Ubulette | i like jsview too | 23:23 |
| asac | go ahead we have a general ff exception for extensions :) | 23:24 |
| Ubulette | web developper too but the author still doesn't want to release his ff3 compatible code | 23:24 |
| Ubulette | fullerscreen is good too | 23:24 |
| asac | bug 193225 | 23:24 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 193225 in firefox-3.0 "FF: general exception for firefox 3 extension packages signed off by the mozillateam" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193225 | 23:24 |
| asac | Ubulette: if the license fits ... anything can go in | 23:25 |
| asac | if you want more exciting packages, look out for extensions with native components | 23:25 |
| asac | damn thing | 23:27 |
| asac | look at the last message in Bug 144042 | 23:27 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 144042 in ubufox "firefox plugin-install says "plugin installed" for non-completed installation" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144042 | 23:27 |
| asac | since when are bugs a support medium to get answers to whatever you like ;) | 23:28 |
| Ubulette | lol | 23:28 |
| asac | look how he inlined my mail ;) | 23:29 |
| asac | :-P | 23:29 |
| asac | like 1 word per line. yeah! | 23:29 |
| asac | at least the mailer honoured the reply-to header. what an achievement | 23:30 |
| asac | really | 23:30 |
| asac | could be worse ;) | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | outlook effect | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | btw, i've packaged tb3 | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | well, sort of | 23:30 |
| Ubulette | it builds fine in dist but make install doesn't work | 23:31 |
| jetsaredim | asac: re original package - firebug - www.getfirebug.com | 23:41 |
| asac | Ubulette: in-house router was down | 23:46 |
| asac | jetsaredim: i don't see any b12 nor b11 on that page. where exactly? | 23:47 |
| Ubulette | <Ubulette> btw, i've packaged tb3 | 23:48 |
| Ubulette | <Ubulette> well, sort of | 23:48 |
| Ubulette | <Ubulette> it builds fine in dist but make install doesn't work | 23:48 |
| asac | Ubulette: yeah ... i got that ;) | 23:48 |
| asac | my irssi runs in front of that | 23:48 |
| asac | ;) | 23:48 |
| Ubulette | that was it | 23:48 |
| asac | yeah make install broken was expected | 23:48 |
| asac | they will never get it right | 23:49 |
| asac | tbird devs even less | 23:49 |
| asac | does mail/ have its own packages-static? | 23:49 |
| jetsaredim | asac: http://www.getfirebug.com/releases/allReleases.html | 23:50 |
| asac | jetsaredim: but install.rdf is b12 as well in there | 23:52 |
| asac | so all looks fine for me | 23:52 |
| asac | whats your problem now? | 23:52 |
| jetsaredim | i was basing the package off the source tree | 23:52 |
| jetsaredim | which lists b11 | 23:53 |
| asac | where is that? | 23:53 |
| asac | a "firebug source" | 23:53 |
| jetsaredim | fbug.googlecode.com | 23:53 |
| jetsaredim | i emailed the maintainer to see if he knew what the problem was | 23:54 |
| asac | yeah strange | 23:54 |
| asac | for now stick to what is in svn i guess | 23:54 |
| asac | firebug-1.1 branch? | 23:54 |
| jetsaredim | nah - was using trunk | 23:56 |
| asac | yeah ... no idea. for now keep it that way | 23:56 |
| asac | have you pushed things to bzr / launchpad already? | 23:56 |
| jetsaredim | yea pretty much | 23:56 |
| Ubulette | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jetsaredim/firefox-extensions/firebug.ubuntu | 23:56 |
| jetsaredim | but still doesn't explain what i should do with the package version | 23:57 |
| jetsaredim | feels kind of odd to have the package version b12 and have the install.rdf say b11 | 23:57 |
| asac | jetsaredim: keep the one in install.rdf | 23:57 |
| jetsaredim | right | 23:57 |
| asac | i didn't know that you have 2 different sources | 23:57 |
| jetsaredim | so i should change the version number in the changelog? | 23:57 |
| asac | if svn is b11 .. and you base your package on that, use b11 | 23:58 |
| jetsaredim | ok | 23:58 |
| asac | but remember if you don'tuse a tag you shoiuld also append a revno to the version | 23:58 |
| asac | e.g. 1.1.0~b11+svn2333 | 23:58 |
| asac | e.g. the svn revision number you used | 23:58 |
| asac | Ubulette: what scheme do we use for svn ? | 23:59 |
| asac | or is it +rev2333 ? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!