=== fabbione is now known as thegodfather
[08:38] <edosar> hi
[08:39] <edosar> i 'm trying to connect my hardy alpha4 to wireless without much luck, i have a Dynex DX wgUSB
[08:40] <edosar> some one could redirect me to the proper information so i can give it a try
[08:49] <kraut> moin
[11:07] <allerbest> Hi!
[11:07] <allerbest> I was sent here by folks in #ubuntu-install
[11:08] <allerbest> I've got a problem installung Edubuntu 7.10 on a brand-new Xeon C2D, Areca 1200 PCIe SATA hardware RAID controller, 8 GB RAM
[11:08] <allerbest> The installer can't see any disk devices
[11:09] <allerbest> What to do now? (syslog, lspci -vvnn etc. is online available, if needed)
[12:16] <rtg> tjaalton: do you have time to do an lrm upload today? The -10 kernel has been accepted into the archive.
[12:18] <tjaalton> rtg: yes, it's ready although not much has changed
[12:19] <tjaalton> xen enabled again..
[12:20] <rtg> tjaalton: cool. thanks. I'm about to prep and upload meta.
[12:30] <tjaalton> rtg: I also added some plumbing for -virtual but didn't enable it yet
[12:31] <rtg> tjaalton: what do you think is likely to be a candidate for support in the virtual image?
[12:33] <tjaalton> rtg: you mean which lrm version will support virtual?
[12:34] <rtg> tjaalton: no, I was just wondering which module in lrm should be built for virtual.
[12:34] <rtg> the virtual image doesn't have much for hardware needs.
[12:34] <tjaalton> rtg: oh right.. I'm not sure if it's needed at all
[12:35] <tjaalton> just that you asked about it earlier :)
[12:35] <rtg> OK, I might have been smoking crack at the time :)
[12:35] <tjaalton> hehe, I'll drop it then
[12:35] <rtg> anyway, I gotta go. I'll be back online in about 90 minutes.
[12:35] <tjaalton> ok, see you
[12:43] <tjaalton> bah, lrm still doesn't build with xen
[12:51] <tjaalton> well, nv doesn't
[15:17] <tjaalton> rtg: fglrx failed to build for xen on i386, and the error seems strange (amd64 built fine)
[15:17] <rtg> tjaalton: turn it off for xen until zul can look at it.
[15:18] <zul> can you send me the build log?
[15:18] <tjaalton> rtg: ok..
[15:19] <tjaalton> zul: a sec
[15:20] <tjaalton> zul: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5010/
[15:21] <tjaalton> part of firegl_public.c there
[15:21] <abogani> tjaalton: -rt compile fine?
[15:21] <tjaalton> abogani: yes
[15:21] <abogani> tjaalton: Thanks!
[15:21] <tjaalton> abogani: -rt was enabled already ;)
[15:22] <abogani> tjaalton: Opssss :-)
[15:27] <zul> I think you want CONFIG_X86_XEN there
[15:31] <zul> tjaalton: ^^^
[15:31] <tjaalton> zul: yep
[15:32] <tjaalton> zul: so amd64-xen just happens to have one of those defined and it worked?
[15:32] <zul> I would have to check
[15:34] <zul> tjaalton, amd64 xen is setup different 
[15:36] <tjaalton> zul: ok
[15:50] <tjaalton> zul: nv-new fails to build as well, "nv-linux.h:115:22: error: xen/page.h: No such file or directory"
[15:51] <zul> tjaalton, ok Ill have a look 
[15:51] <zul> where can I get the source from?
[15:52] <tjaalton> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/2.6.24.9-10.26
[15:52] <tjaalton> note that you need to add xen to nv_flavours
[15:55] <tjaalton> zul: I wonder if "export IGNORE_XEN_PRESENCE=1" has anything to do with it..
[15:56] <zul> tjaalton, no idea im still downloading it
[15:57] <tjaalton> zul: there was a patch for ati in ati/patches-old :)
[15:57] <zul> so it works now?
[15:57] <tjaalton> ati build works
[15:57] <zul> nifty but not the nvidia?
[15:57] <tjaalton> right
[15:58] <tjaalton> actually, I didn't try the build on i386
[16:18] <zul> tjaalton: http://people.ubuntu.com/~chucks/1-nvidia-2.6.24-xen.patch
[16:22] <tjaalton> zul: that's the one from the package?
[16:23] <zul> tjaalton, yeah I modified where its looking for page.h
[16:23] <tjaalton> aah
[16:32] <tjaalton> one final build with both archs..
[16:35] <tjaalton> zul: ok, more problems :)
[16:35] <zul> tjaalton, yay send me the log
[16:36] <tjaalton> zul: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/5016/
[16:42] <BenC> New page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Sprints
[16:50] <abogani> Good Sprint days guys! :-)
[16:58] <BenC> Updated: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Roadmap
[17:01] <johanbr> mjg59: Could I ask you about something ACPI-related? Could an error like "ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PR_.CPU1._PCT] (Node ffff81007c364b60), AE_NOT_FOUND" on resume make cpufreq support disappear on one core?
[17:11] <BenC> BTW, kernel meeting canceled today because of sprint...we are all stuffing our faces with lunch right now :)
=== BenC changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam | Latest kernel upload: 2.6.24-8.14 | Latest news: 2.6.24 Release in Hardy | Next meeting: Mar 4, 17:00 UTC | Kernel Team machine: http://kernel.ubuntu.com
=== BenC changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam | Latest kernel upload: 2.6.24-10.16 | Latest news: 2.6.24 Release in Hardy | Next meeting: Mar 4, 17:00 UTC | Kernel Team machine: http://kernel.ubuntu.com
[18:00] <jayc> amitk__: Does ubuntu-hardy have the latest moblin patches (USB Client beta 4) yet?
[18:02] <amitk__> jayc: What does the DRIVER_VERSION string in iusbc.c read?
[18:03] <amitk__> jayc: alpha4 will be uploaded to hardy later this week
[18:04] <jayc> amitk__: DRIVER_VERSION  "2.0.0.32L.0008"
[18:05] <jayc> amitk__: alpah4 or beta4? I was talking about 0017-poulsbo_USBC.patch
=== XSource_ is now known as XSource
[18:08] <jayc> amitk__: From the ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git log it looks like the latest moblin patches are not in ubuntu-hardy yet.
[18:08] <amitk__> jayc: I meant alpha4 in hardy. The last patch you submitted isn't in hardy yet. It will come end of the week
[18:09] <jayc> amitk__: Ok, thanks. some one here at Intel was asking about it.
[18:12] <amitk__> jayc: is there a deadline for that?
[18:12] <jayc> amitk__: I'm not aware of it, I will have to find out
[18:13] <amitk__> jayc: i'm am not aware of it either, once an image for intel is made this week, I will update hardy with your last set of patches
[18:13] <jayc> amitk__: got it
[18:20] <mjg59> johanbr: Quite possibly
[18:23] <allerbest> Hi.
[18:25] <allerbest> I've got a problem installing Edubuntu 7.10 x64 on a brand-new server with Xeon 3075, 8 GB RAM, Areca ARC-1200 SATA RAID controller. Installation runs smooth until a "Detect disks" dialog pops up.
[18:25] <allerbest> I'm asked to pick a drive since none was detected.
[18:26] <allerbest> The guys from #ubuntu-installer send me to this channel.
[18:27] <allerbest> 'parted_devices' returns no output, same for 'list-devices disk'
[18:27] <allerbest> (in the rescue console ALT-F2)
[18:31] <allerbest> lspci detects the controller as:
[18:31] <allerbest> 05:00.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: Areca Technology Corp. Unknown device [17d3:1201]
[18:31] <allerbest> But the ARC-1200 should be supported by the 'arcmsr' module, right?
[18:34] <johanbr> mjg59: I see. Can the kernel be made to work around that somehow? (this is bug #124797)
[18:34] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 124797 in linux-source-2.6.22 "CPU Frequency Scaling Monitor applet on dual-core doesn't work after resume" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124797
[18:35] <mjg59> johanbr: If you only get it on resume and not on boot, we probably need to work out why it's happening
[18:36] <johanbr> Alright. Cpufreq works fine on boot, but after resume the sysfs cpufreq directory on the second core disappears. What more information would you need?
[18:37] <johanbr> Apart from what's already in the bug, that is.
[18:53] <allerbest> Has anyone got a clue what's going on with the kernel & ARC-1200?
=== chuck_ is now known as zul
[20:45] <allerbest> The guys from #ubuntu-installer send me to this channel.
[20:46] <allerbest> I've got a problem installing Edubuntu 7.10 x64 on a brand-new server with Xeon 3075, 8 GB RAM, Areca ARC-1200 SATA RAID controller.
[20:46] <allerbest> Installation runs smooth until a "Detect disks" dialog pops up.
[20:46] <allerbest> I'm asked to pick a drive since none was detected.
[20:46] <allerbest> 'parted_devices' returns no output, same for 'list-devices disk'
[20:46] <allerbest> (in the rescue console ALT-F2)
[20:46] <allerbest> lspci detects the controller as:
[20:47] <allerbest> 05:00.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: Areca Technology Corp. Unknown device [17d3:1201]
[20:47] <allerbest> But the ARC-1200 should be supported by the 'arcmsr' module, right?
[20:56] <BenC> allerbest: It's not supported in gutsy (7.10), but it is in hardy
[20:56] <BenC> allerbest: I suggest either giving hardy Alpha 5 a try, or wait a couple days and try Alpha 6
[20:57] <BenC> both should work
[20:57] <allerbest> Hm. Thanks for the answer.
[20:57] <allerbest> Unfortunately I don't have weeks to wait
[20:58] <allerbest> The pupils are waiting and without the LTSP server they don't have anything ...
[20:58] <allerbest> Why is it not supported? "arcmsr" is included in 7.10.
[21:05] <allerbest> Is there a way to inject a new module to the installation process?
[21:08] <amitk__> allerbest: because support for the 1200 was only added in September, so it didnt get into Gutsy 7.10
[21:08] <allerbest> Argl.
[21:09] <allerbest> Bummer.
[21:09] <allerbest> Are there any workarounds?
[21:09] <amitk__> allerbest: you could patch your own kernel
[21:11] <allerbest> Is there a how-to?
[21:11] <allerbest> I know how to compile a kernel.
[21:11] <allerbest> but not how to inject/add to the installation process of Ubuntu/Edubuntu
[21:28] <JanC> allerbest: try searching the wiki for "kernel"
[21:29] <JanC> and maybe you only need to compile a module ?
[21:32] <allerbest> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ModuleBuilding?highlight=%28module%29
[21:32] <allerbest> ?
[21:33] <allerbest> nope ...
[21:39] <alex_joni> allerbest: there's a wiki page on the LiveCD, it also includes a section how to replace the kernel
[21:42] <alex_joni> Customizing the LiveCD I mean
[21:43] <allerbest> Hm. I hope the procedure is the same for the server version
[21:43] <allerbest> (because I need the server)
[21:44] <alex_joni> I'm sure it's very similar
[21:45] <alex_joni> I packaged a LiveCD with a custom kernel a while ago (2 years), and basicly I had to follow those steps, install the new kernel packages, then replace vmlinuz and the initrd
[21:54] <allerbest> okay, thanks
[21:54] <tjaalton> rtg: typical.. nvidia released 169.12 today
[21:55] <tjaalton> rtg: but it'll have to wait for a while
[22:07] <rtg> tjaalton: isn't that the way it always works :)
[22:08] <tjaalton> rtg: apparently yes.. anyway, there's the conexant driver which could be useful as well, so a new tarball would take some time anyway :P
[22:09] <tjaalton> also, fritz and ltmodem have been disabled all this time, so maybe try to resurrect those as well
[22:14] <allerbest> Thanks for the support & good night ...
[22:53] <rtg> jayc: how about changing the email address in debian/changelog before you upload to your PPA ? I assume you want the build failure emails.
[22:54] <jayc> rtg: Was that the reason for build failure?
[22:55] <rtg> jayc: probably not, I didn't read them.
[22:56] <jayc> rtg: but I'm getting the emails though
[22:56] <rtg> jayc: as am I :)
[22:57] <jayc> rtg: sorry, :-( I didn't realize that
=== mdomsch is now known as mdomsch_BOS
[23:42] <CarlFK> what has to take place for this patch: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg01968.html  to get into the hardy kernel? http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=blob;f=drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c;h=b10f39c047e944848f3ac2aa4067e820d2f5df90;hb=HEAD#l314