[03:48] <marnanel> I have a program I've been building in a private branch and I just created a project for it.  The docs say I can do "bzr push lp:~marnanel/blog-wrangler/trunk" but that fails with " http does not support mkdir()".  Did I do something wrong?
[03:56] <RAOF> marnanel: You probably need to tell bzr about your launchpad username.  Before you do that, bzr will default to http:// redirection (which is read-only) rather than bzr+ssh://
[03:56] <RAOF> To do this, you'd run "bzr launchpad-login <lpnick>"
[03:58] <marnanel> RAOF: Oh, lovely. *tries it*
[03:59] <marnanel> hm, I don't appear to have that command. But I will try using bzr+ssh:// instead of http://...
[04:07] <RAOF> Hm.  I thought anyone for whom the lp: redirection worked should have launchpad-login.
[04:10] <marnanel> Yay, bzr+ssh:// worked.
[04:10] <marnanel> Thank you for your help.
[05:00] <ubotu> New bug: #197862 in launchpad "Mis-crediting upstream translators as reviewers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197862
[06:55] <ubotu> New bug: #197889 in rosetta "Users can delete translations" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197889
[07:00] <ubotu> New bug: #197891 in rosetta "Offer version control for translation changes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197891
=== stu1 is now known as stub
=== doko_ is now known as doko
[08:05] <mdke> is there any plan to have commits to Launchpad branches which are registered under a product series automatically mark bugs with a certain syntax in the commit message as fix committed? A bit like with the Ubuntu uploads?
[08:06] <RAOF> mdke: I'm pretty sure that's already implemented, but I'm not sure about the actual syntax - it may be Fixes: #lpbug or Closes: #lpbug, or something similar.
[08:08] <mdke> ah, that would be neat
[08:11] <mdke> RAOF: I can't find anything in the help wiki at the moment
[08:11] <RAOF> Hm.  Many of the LP/bzr guys will be in London right now for a sprint, and as such not really up now :)
[08:12] <mdke> lazybones
[08:14] <mithro> I wish the LP guys would hurry up and support git :)
[08:14] <RAOF> mithro: As in mirroring git branches to nice, sane bzr?  That'd be nice.
[08:15] <mithro> RAOF: well - just being able to tell launchpad about remove git branches would be nice
[08:15] <mithro> s/remove/remote/
[08:16] <carlos_> morning
=== carlos_ is now known as carlos
[08:17] <mtaylor> ARRRRGGGGG
=== Odd_Blok1 is now known as Odd_Bloke
[08:21] <RAOF> mtaylor: Surely you need to follow such an excaimation up with juicy details?
[08:24] <mdke> i'll second that
[08:25] <ubotu> New bug: #197909 in launchpad "Broken links in Help wiki - "Wiki Destinations" portlet" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197909
[08:25] <mtaylor> every time I upload a package to a PPA that is the first package for that release series the build fails on the first time it tries to read from the non-exsitent local ppa apt repos
[08:27] <Fujitsu> mtaylor: Indeed. Just retry it, and it will work. You only have to do it 5 times, hopefully.
[08:34] <mtaylor> Fujitsu: yup :)
[08:34] <mtaylor> Fujitsu: but it's a little annoying :)
[09:10] <ubotu> New bug: #196106 in language-pack-kde-de "context menu entry "Paste File" [and other dialogs] not translated into German (anymore)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196106
[09:11] <cprov> bigjools: hey
[09:11] <bigjools> cprov: duuuuuuude
[09:12] <cprov> mhr:  welcome 
[09:12] <mhr> cprov: cool!
=== cprov is now known as cprov-afk
[11:39] <aVirulence> can someone help me out with setting up translations for my  project?
[11:40] <intellectronica> danilos or carlos should be able to help you
[11:42] <aVirulence> see, the problem is the following, I've uploaded a .pot file, but the message remains that we're waiting for review
[11:43] <carlos> aVirulence: I will do a new queue review today, so it should be approved later today
[11:43] <danilos> aVirulence: we do manual approvals (for reasons stated on https://help.launchpad.net/TranslationsImportPolicy)
[11:45] <aVirulence> thanks, I was wondering if I should give myself some rights in order to approve it or that I should wait until someone approved it for me. However, since I uploaded it last Tuesday, I thought I should ask.. ;-) 
[11:46] <aVirulence> oh another, thing, since I uploaded the *.pot file, there have been some changes.. I tried to delete the *.pot file I uploaded before and add a newer version, but it gives me "There are 2 errors"
[11:57] <aVirulence> carlos or danilos, any thoughts on that?
[11:58] <danilos> aVirulence: you should be able to just re-upload the file, no need to delete the old one (it may even cause problems if the same file names are used)
[12:00] <aVirulence> danilos, well, the thing is, another contributor also uploaded messages.pot but he did it with (probably) the right directory po/messages.pot that's why I wanted to remove it
[12:05] <carlos> aVirulence: I will handle it. is the content the same?
[12:05] <aVirulence> carlos, perhaps his messages.pot file is a bit more recent
[12:05] <carlos> ok, I will use latest one then
[12:06] <aVirulence> thanks carlos
[12:06] <carlos> np
[12:16] <nelius> hi folks
[12:16] <nelius> i registered my project last week at launchpad.
[12:17] <nelius> how long does it take, till a trunk from subversion gets imported?
[12:17] <nelius> i also uploaded my first po file, how long does it take, till i can start translations?
[12:19] <aVirulence> nelius, I just had the same question, today's another import day
[12:20] <aVirulence> so, later today
[12:24] <nelius> ok, tnkx
[13:03] <carlos> aVirulence: hmm, I don't see anything pending to approve for any project. Which project is the one where you uploaded files to?
[13:04] <aVirulence> LottaNZB
[13:07] <carlos> aVirulence: approved
[13:07] <aVirulence> carlos, thanks a lot :)
[13:15] <aVirulence> carlos, I just uploaded the latest version. I thought that later additions could be uploaded without first needing approval
[13:16] <carlos> aVirulence: that's true, but is not instantaneous
[13:16] <carlos> it would take between 5 and 30 minutes to be imported
[13:17] <aVirulence> ah, thanks again, btw, my fellow contributor uploaded the file with a path po/messages.pot, do you know how to do that?
[13:17] <carlos> aVirulence: he uploaded a tarball
[13:17] <aVirulence> ah
[13:17] <aVirulence> thanks
[13:18] <carlos> np
[13:33] <LarstiQ> elmo: thanks! One of these days I'll have working wifi.
[13:36] <elmo> LarstiQ: welcome
[14:35] <ndazza> hi, is there a way to update my email address in Launchpad? The one i used to sign up with is no longer a valid email account
[15:06] <ubotu> New bug: #198028 in launchpad "Ability to be able to list branches from the command-line" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198028
[15:13] <mrevell> ndazza: Hi. If you no longer have access to that original email address, please create a new Launchpad account using your current email address and then file an admin request (https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion) to ask us to merge your new account with your previous account.
[15:14] <ndazza> ok thanks mrevell
[15:14] <mrevell> np
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
=== thumper_laptop is now known as thumper
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
[16:51] <ubotu> New bug: #198056 in malone "Marking duplicate should also change "master bug" of duplicates" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198056
[16:56] <ubotu> New bug: #198058 in malone "Comments made up entirely of whitespace should be discarded" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198058
[16:58] <afflux> how can I mark the translation of my project in rosetta as "synced"?
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado
[17:02] <carlos> afflux: upload it as 'published' (in the per language upload form) or upload a tarball in the per template upload form if you don't want to go one by one
[17:02] <carlos> afflux: which project are we talking about? I could tell you the direct URLs
[17:02] <afflux> carlos: gdecrypt
[17:03] <carlos> afflux: https://translations.launchpad.net/gdecrypt/trunk/+pots/gdecrypt/+upload
[17:04] <carlos> anything you upload there will be uploaded as 'synced'
[17:04] <afflux> ah, okay
[17:04] <afflux> carlos: will rosetta choose the new "suggestions" from the uploaded POs as the used ones, when the previously selected in rosetta differ?
[17:04] <afflux> or will they be just added as new suggestions?
[17:06] <carlos> afflux: if they differ from what we had imported first, they will appear as suggestions
[17:06] <afflux> okay, thank you
[17:06] <carlos> afflux: otherwise, Launchpad will continue showing the one you upload as the translation
[17:06] <carlos> np
[17:40] <ubotu> New bug: #198075 in launchpad "Check signature of requests to +request-token" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198075
[17:50] <RainCT> Hey
[17:50] <RainCT> Is it possible to link to an upstream bug without registering the project in Launchpad?
[17:50] <RainCT> (for Ubuntu bugs)
[17:51] <salgado> RainCT, nope, but you can register the new project quite easily when linking to the upstream bug tracker
[17:53] <RainCT> salgado: how can I do that?
[17:53] <salgado> RainCT, just click on the "Also affects Product" link
[17:54] <salgado> s/Product/Project
[17:54] <RainCT> yes I'm there
[17:54] <salgado> RainCT, search for the project and if it doesn't show up you'll be offered a link to register it
[17:54] <RainCT> ah, at the bottom
[17:55] <RainCT> Thanks :)
[17:55] <salgado> you're welcome
[17:56] <RainCT> great, BerliOS isn't supported... :P
[18:52] <ubotu> New bug: #198092 in launchpad-bazaar "Should tell the user to run bzr launchpad-login before push lp:" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198092
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette
[19:13] <philn> hi
[19:39] <cyberix> Launchpad allows me to publish my bzr branch for a project even, when the project admins wouldn't want me to do that?C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C
[19:47] <intellectronica> cyberix: sure, that's the cool thing about launchpad code hosting! and why wouldn't the project admins want you to do that? all projects on launchpad are free software, and contributions are always welcome...
[19:48] <cyberix> intellectronica: What, if the project has not been registered?
[19:48] <cyberix> I would not want to admin it as it is not my project
[19:51] <intellectronica> cyberix: what's the project? sometimes we import projects ourselves and then offer them to the real project admins if they want to take over
[19:51] <cyberix> Quite indie atm
[19:51] <intellectronica> cyberix: you could do this yourself, but you probably shouldn't publish your branch as the main branch, but rather import the project's official branch, and then add your own branch for any changes you want to make
[19:51] <cyberix> But I was asking about the general philosophy
[19:52] <intellectronica> cyberix: the philosophy is that this is all free software, and we want to make it as easy as possible for simple to contribute
[19:53] <intellectronica> cyberix: anyway, which project is it? is it hosted elsewhere? you can import CVS and Subversion branches automatically, and you can create 'bug watches' which import the status of bugs from other bug trackers
[19:57] <cyberix> Can I register bzr branches that are not mine?
[20:00] <intellectronica> cyberix: you can import them, but if they are really someone else's, it would be nice to offer them to take over if and when they want to. don't forget that it's free software, you have the right to copy and modify and do whatever you want with the sources as long as you comply with the license
[20:01] <nelius> intellectronica: someone told me today is an "import day"...
[20:02] <nelius> is there any chance to get our project code imported today?
[20:03] <intellectronica> nelius: i'm not really sure what that means, and what sort of import you are expecting. whom did you talk to?
[20:03] <nelius> i just was asking this morning in this channel, if someone knows when svn branches get imorted / or how long it takes.
[20:04] <nelius> the project is tine20, an egroupware fork
=== salgado_ is now known as salgado
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson
=== neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde
[21:26] <goobsoft> Why is it that my PPA packages don't show up in the standard Add/Remove Programs (gnome-app-install) interface?
[21:37] <mpt> Gooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[21:38]  * mpt scowls at NetworkManager
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson
[21:45] <ubotu> New bug: #198142 in launchpad "lauchpad marks strings as 'need review' when none is needing a review" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198142
[22:49] <jkakar> You guys rule.
[22:49] <jkakar> :)
[22:50] <jkakar> I just had my package build for 5 Ubuntu releases in 7 minutes.
[22:50] <jkakar> I'm very happy! :)
[22:51] <ubotu> New bug: #198169 in malone "Filing package bug against project requires far too many page loads" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198169
[22:52] <mpt> jamesh_, is there anything useful we can do with bug 148636?
[22:57] <ffm> what happens once we get really big bug numbers, like 48564516487.7 non-terminating?
=== Sciri_ is now known as Sciri
[23:11] <jamesh_> mpt: other than Launchpad-over-HTTP, I don't know.
[23:12] <mpt> ffm, I discussed that issue in bug 100000
[23:12] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 100000 in malone "There are still too many bug reports" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/100000
[23:14] <jamesh_> ffm: I guess we could always switch to base-64 bug numbers -- that'd shorten them a bit
[23:15] <ffm> jamesh_: how about base36?
[23:15] <jamesh_> ffm: base64 would cut the length by ~ 45%.  Base36 would be just 35%
[23:18] <soren> jamesh_: So 0-9a-z and then what for the remaining ones?
[23:18] <ffm> soren: A-Z.
=== jamesh_ is now known as jamesh
[23:18] <ffm> soren: and !-*
[23:18] <jamesh> soren: probably just the standard characters used by base64
[23:18] <soren> See, that's where it gets icky :)
[23:19] <soren> jamesh: Um... Good thinking :)
[23:20] <mpt> But we'd have to have some way of avoiding a clash with the bug nicknamespace
[23:20] <jamesh> '+' and '/'
[23:20] <jamesh> mpt: we could base-64 encode the nicknames too
[23:20] <soren> Hah!
[23:21] <jamesh> and require that nicknames contain more bits than the largest bug number
[23:21] <mpt> How would that avoid the clash?
[23:21] <mpt> oh, ok
[23:21] <mpt> So we'd need to decide on a largest bug number
[23:21] <mpt> I propose 640
[23:21] <soren> Is that base64 or base10?
[23:21] <mpt> 640 bugs should be enough for anyone
[23:24] <mwhudson> ba-dum tish