[00:38] <ubotu> New bug: #194739 in xf86-input-evtouch (universe) "My touchscreen can't work well" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194739
[01:41] <ubotu> New bug: #196938 in firefox-3.0 (main) "Some pages shows crazy in FF3 (dup-of: 182038)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196938
=== bryce_ is now known as bryyce
[07:41] <ubotu> New bug: #194933 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "Compiz + 169-series NVIDIA drivers: frequent visual corruption of window title bars upon various title bar events" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194933
[07:51] <ubotu> New bug: #194851 in compiz (main) "Pink shadows with Compiz (dup-of: 186382)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194851
[10:31] <ubotu> New bug: #197789 in firefox-3.0 (main) "resized images are rendered all black (dup-of: 182038)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197789
[10:40] <ubotu> New bug: #139544 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (restricted) "Restricted Manager pushes wrong driver" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139544
[11:35] <ubotu> New bug: #197955 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "not installable in hardy amd64" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197955
=== asac__ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[14:46] <ubotu> New bug: #197116 in xorg-server (main) "Screen garbage with Intel 830 (Install CD)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197116
[15:50] <seb128> bryce: around?
[15:54] <ubotu> New bug: #150058 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "defects in some parts of the screen" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150058
=== asac__ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[16:35] <ubotu> New bug: #198044 in xorg (main) "nv kernel module not found" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198044
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[17:49] <bryce> seb128: heya
[17:49] <seb128> hey bryce
[17:50] <seb128> bryce: did you start on moving the gnome-desktop to a copy?
[17:50] <bryce> yes, I got most of the changes done friday; now just need to get it to compile and build
[17:53] <seb128> bryce: ok, lool doesn't agree that's the best way to do thing and likes the lib with unstable define better so I'm not sure what is right now
[17:53] <seb128> sorry about that
[17:53] <seb128> maybe worth discussing at the meeting this week
[17:53] <bryce> uff
[17:54] <bryce> ok, I'll set aside the remainder of that work.  Sounds like the radeonhd xrandr bugs need some attention so I'll focus on those.
[17:55] <seb128> yes, I was going to mention that
[17:55] <seb128> sorry again
[17:55] <seb128> I still think the copy is better than abusing the lib so it's not sure that will not be used yet ;-)
[17:56] <seb128> I'm cleaning duplicates of the g-s-d crasher now
[17:56] <seb128> there seem to be different issues
[17:56] <bryce> ok
[17:56] <seb128> an xerror, likely happening to people who have a driver not supporting xrand1.2
[17:56] <seb128> and a crasher
[17:57] <seb128> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/197706 has a detailled stacktrace of the crasher
[17:57] <bryce> I suspect the fix is going to need to be some sort of blacklist in g-s-d, so it'll probably be good to know what range of cards have the problem
[17:57] <seb128> hum?
[17:57] <seb128> why?
[17:57] <seb128> I think the crasher is a code bug which should be fixed
[17:58] <seb128> and there is likely an api to ask xorg if xrandr1.2 is supported no?
[17:59] <bryce> well, what I suspect is that the drivers are actually saying they do support xrandr 1.2, but in reality they don't
[17:59] <jcristau> it's called XRRQueryVersion()
[17:59] <seb128> those drivers should be fixed if they do that no?
[18:00] <bryce> certainly, but I'm worried that may be a lot more work than can be achieved in the near term
[18:00] <bryce> also, at least one reporter was using -nvidia, which we can't fix
[18:00] <bryce> seb128: have you seen any reports of this issue by fglrx users?
[18:00] <seb128> all that sounds like we want to drop the change and defer the spec to next cycle
[18:01] <seb128> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop/+bug/197153 has comments from intel, fglrx, radeonhd users
[18:01] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 197153 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV" [Undecided,New] 
[18:01] <bryce> well, let me look into it; it might be something simpler
[18:02] <seb128> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/dell/+bug/197354 is nvidia using xinerama
[18:02] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 197354 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon doesn't work with xinerama (nvidia, amd64) (dup-of: 197153)" [Undecided,New] 
[18:02] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 197153 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV" [Undecided,New] 
[18:03] <seb128> "enabling Xinerama (with one or two displays) causes it to crash on startup. The assertion "screen != NULL" fails in screen_update, after a parse error starting xrandr manager."
[18:03] <seb128> interesting comment
[18:03] <bryce> ok, if nvidia with xinerama and fglrx are also failing, then it may be just a missing xrandr 1.2 check, which should be easy to stick in
[18:04] <seb128> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/198017 is a dell laptop using nvidia
[18:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 198017 in ubuntu "Gnome Desktop crashes if i start it with compiz (dup-of: 197153)" [Undecided,New] 
[18:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 197153 in gnome-settings-daemon "gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV" [Undecided,New] 
[21:19] <ubotu> New bug: #197999 in xorg (main) "Changing of Screen Resolution does not work. The present resolution stays whatever button I click on." [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197999
[22:34] <bryce> http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/03/hands-on-with-the-9-inch-eee-pc/
[22:40] <ubotu> New bug: #198165 in xorg (main) "Screen rotation does not work on ATI R350 (Radeon 9800 Pro) with "radeon" driver" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198165
[23:05] <ubotu> New bug: #198176 in xorg (main) "gdm[5056]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198176
[23:17] <ubotu> New bug: #194760 in xresprobe (main) "EDID fail" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194760
[23:47] <ubotu> New bug: #198184 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "Linux-image-2.6.24-11-generic doesn't wakeup the screen after suspend" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198184