asac | bug 197538 | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
ubotu | Launchpad bug 197538 in network-manager "Network Manager 0.6.6 RC2 is now available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/197538 | 00:08 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== Mirv_ is now known as mirv | ||
=== mirv is now known as Mirv | ||
asac | Ubulette: do you have a diff.gz for cairo as well? | 10:22 |
asac | carlos: could you check that the syntax in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/LaunchpadTranslationSupport (for .po) file is what we can expect to be exported? i would like to handcraft .po files for ubufox based on that (unless you say that we can have an export today of course ;)) | 10:23 |
carlos | asac: we can have an export today | 10:24 |
asac | \o/ | 10:24 |
* asac hugs carlos | 10:24 | |
carlos | asac: I'm finishing fixing the export to fit our needs right now | 10:24 |
asac | carlos: ok, can you fix the example on the wiki ? | 10:24 |
carlos | sure | 10:24 |
asac | or take a look if its already the right syntax | 10:25 |
carlos | hmm | 10:25 |
carlos | I think is correct | 10:25 |
carlos | at least I don't see any difference right now... | 10:26 |
asac | ok ... just give me an ack if you are sure ;) | 10:26 |
carlos | asac: if we talk about: | 10:35 |
carlos | # en-US.xpi/en-US.jar!/locale/translation.dtd(the.firefox.key) | 10:35 |
carlos | msgid "The original en-US text" | 10:35 |
carlos | msgstr "The translated xx-XX text" | 10:35 |
carlos | yes... actually, no, it should be #: en-US... | 10:35 |
carlos | other than that, yes | 10:35 |
carlos | asac: also, if you find a message with a line like: '#, fuzzy' | 10:37 |
carlos | the translation should not be used | 10:37 |
asac | carlos: can you update the wiki page? | 10:54 |
carlos | sure, just a minute, I'm going to import and then export the xpi files you gave me yesterday... | 10:54 |
asac | great | 10:57 |
carlos | asac: firefox template import failed, seems like I found a bug in our parser... xulrunner one is still running so maybe I'm able to provide you with an example .po file for it | 11:26 |
asac | good | 11:32 |
asac | carlos: how did ffox fail? (on which entity) | 11:32 |
carlos | asac: the problem is with browser/safebrowsing/blockedSite.properties | 11:33 |
carlos | asac: there is an unescaped '=' char | 11:33 |
carlos | and that confuses our parser | 11:33 |
carlos | it's easy to fix, just look for the first '=' to split id from translation | 11:33 |
asac | yeah :) | 11:35 |
asac | you need to take everything from the first = to the end :) | 11:35 |
carlos | right | 11:36 |
carlos | asac: I just updated the wiki page | 11:55 |
carlos | asac: I need to leave now, so I cannot provide you with an export just right now | 11:56 |
carlos | I will provide you with it later today | 11:56 |
carlos | though | 11:56 |
asac | ok thats fine | 11:57 |
jetsaredi1 | asac: I think you scared away the mozgest guy | 13:15 |
asac | jetsaredi1: me? | 13:37 |
asac | why that? | 13:37 |
jetsaredi1 | i got this email from him this morning saying basically "i give up" | 13:39 |
asac | he? | 13:43 |
asac | did you ask him again? | 13:43 |
asac | jetsaredi1: ?? | 13:45 |
asac | did you contact him again? | 13:45 |
jetsaredi1 | yea | 13:48 |
asac | about what? | 13:48 |
asac | jetsaredi1: ? | 13:53 |
jetsaredi1 | not sure | 13:55 |
asac | he? | 13:55 |
jetsaredi1 | he sent me a reply to the thread we had going saying for us to take down his new extension | 13:55 |
asac | can you forward? | 13:56 |
asac | reason? | 13:56 |
jetsaredi1 | i'm still trying to figure it out | 13:57 |
asac | jetsaredi1: let him go. | 13:57 |
jetsaredi1 | i think you may have been a little too eager in a couple of your emails :) | 13:57 |
asac | he? | 13:57 |
asac | last mail i got he didn't sound too unhappy | 13:58 |
jetsaredi1 | yea - no sure | 13:58 |
jetsaredi1 | err not | 13:58 |
jetsaredi1 | i did send him a reply asking what is up so we'll see | 13:58 |
asac | k | 13:58 |
asac | jetsaredi1: what did he say when "asking to take down the extension" | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | "Please remove MozGest Redox." | 13:59 |
asac | just that? | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | yep | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | then there was another email, but i don't know who it was sent to | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | i assume i was on the bcc | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | it was all in german | 13:59 |
jetsaredi1 | which - i could only translate through google | 14:00 |
asac | jetsaredi1: could you forward those ... i am german | 14:00 |
jetsaredi1 | the subject was "MozGest, ich gebe auf" | 14:00 |
asac | and can probably decipher his issues - if possible at all | 14:00 |
jetsaredi1 | which i think means i give up | 14:01 |
asac | yes | 14:01 |
asac | i received that mail | 14:01 |
asac | but you said that there was another | 14:01 |
jetsaredi1 | no that was all | 14:01 |
jetsaredi1 | the i give up and the one about removing mozgest | 14:01 |
jetsaredi1 | o well | 14:02 |
jetsaredi1 | anyway - did you see my update to the extensions page? | 14:04 |
jetsaredi1 | the gmail notifier maintainer was really cool and said that the next release will have a top-level license.txt file with the tri-license in it | 14:05 |
asac | great | 14:09 |
asac | jetsaredi1: btw, i will upload extensions in a batch once i come to it. i have some other topics on my agenda and i want to update those that currently exist in the archive as well | 14:16 |
asac | so don't feel neglected. your work is great ;) | 14:16 |
jetsaredi1 | no no | 14:18 |
jetsaredi1 | you probably want to review the version numbering too | 14:18 |
phoenix24 | Hi!! | 15:13 |
asac | hi phoenix24 | 15:27 |
phoenix24 | Hi asac! | 15:27 |
asac | [reed]: any idea if bugzilla is suffering hard atm? | 15:27 |
asac | mozilla bug 403331 | 15:28 |
phoenix24 | asac: I'm building an ff3 extension, "debuild -b", fails, please help! | 15:28 |
[reed] | asac: yeah, something's up | 15:29 |
asac | [reed]: ok ... so its not just me ;) | 15:29 |
asac | phoenix24: which extension are you working on atm? | 15:29 |
asac | is that in bzr so i can take a look? | 15:29 |
asac | how does debuild -b complain? | 15:29 |
asac | please provide more context :-P | 15:29 |
phoenix24 | asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5256/ | 15:30 |
phoenix24 | bzr, https://code.launchpad.net/~csharma/firefox-extensions/speeddial.upstream | 15:31 |
asac | phoenix24: you just have upstream? | 15:31 |
asac | no ubuntu? | 15:31 |
* asac looking | 15:32 | |
phoenix24 | No, I was testing localbuild.. before pushing it to ubuntu | 15:32 |
asac | phoenix24: ok please paste your rules | 15:32 |
phoenix24 | asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5257/ | 15:34 |
asac | ok ant is not that bad | 15:34 |
asac | what happens if you run ant in the toplevel directory of upstream? | 15:34 |
asac | is ant installed on your sytem? | 15:35 |
phoenix24 | with ant build at toplevel directory, http://paste.ubuntu.com/5258/ | 15:35 |
phoenix24 | What is the "ant", package name ?. . I'll check it. | 15:36 |
asac | phoenix24: well you appear to have ant installed | 15:37 |
asac | but apparently there is a taskdef missing | 15:37 |
phoenix24 | "ant" is installed. | 15:37 |
asac | maybe that task is shipped within speedial (never heard of it before) | 15:37 |
asac | yep | 15:37 |
asac | phoenix24: your problem is "taskdef class net.uworks.andariel.Process cannot be found | 15:37 |
asac | " | 15:37 |
phoenix24 | yeah, check'd that in the build.xml. | 15:37 |
phoenix24 | the general rule is... if there's build.xml, then it its an "ant build" ? | 15:38 |
asac | phoenix24: looks like its http://andariel.uworks.net/ | 15:39 |
asac | which appears to be not in the archive | 15:39 |
phoenix24 | ok, so what need to be done? | 15:40 |
asac | maybe try to just zip things up instead of using ant | 15:42 |
phoenix24 | ok, MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = zip -r speeddial_xxx.xpi ? | 15:44 |
asac | no its not that simple | 15:45 |
asac | let me try something | 15:45 |
asac | phoenix24: here the patch you have to add to your .ubuntu tree | 15:47 |
asac | (process looks like bull-shit ... so i just eliminated it) | 15:47 |
asac | phoenix24: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5261/ | 15:47 |
asac | apply that to your .ubuntu branch | 15:48 |
phoenix24 | ok | 15:48 |
asac | (e.g. patch -p0 < /tmp/filename in case you wonder how) | 15:48 |
asac | then you can use "ant createxpi" as the build command | 15:48 |
phoenix24 | ok! | 15:48 |
asac | but maybe try to run that manually first and see if the .xpi works fine | 15:48 |
phoenix24 | thanks | 15:48 |
asac | np | 15:48 |
phoenix24 | I'll be back in a while | 15:49 |
asac | phoenix24: btw, you need to add "ant" to the Build-Depends: in debian/control ... otherwise the build machines won't have it during build time | 15:50 |
asac | if possible commit these changes in a separate commit | 15:50 |
phoenix24 | asac: while applying patched, I get error HUNK FAILED | 16:05 |
phoenix24 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/5263/ | 16:05 |
phoenix24 | what does it mean ? | 16:05 |
asac | phoenix24: wierd. most likely its a whitespace issue | 16:08 |
asac | (due to copy/paste/ | 16:08 |
asac | try patch -p0 -l < filename | 16:09 |
asac | phoenix24: got what i wrote? | 16:16 |
asac | 17:05 < phoenix24> what does it mean ? | 16:16 |
asac | 17:08 < asac> phoenix24: wierd. most likely its a whitespace issue | 16:16 |
asac | 17:08 < asac> (due to copy/paste/ | 16:16 |
asac | 17:09 < asac> try patch -p0 -l < filename | 16:16 |
phoenix24 | must be white-space error, "patch -p0 -l < filename".. doesn't work either, | 16:19 |
phoenix24 | I'll manually edit it, and generate a patch. | 16:19 |
asac | k | 16:22 |
asac | you can also do the changes by hand | 16:22 |
phoenix24 | yeah, doing by hand | 16:22 |
asac | not that many changes i guess | 16:22 |
phoenix24 | 4-5 in all. | 16:22 |
phoenix24 | asac: sucessfully build, but I get Warnings and errors | 16:30 |
phoenix24 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/5266/ | 16:30 |
asac | phoenix24: yes you should refer to the /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 file in the debian/copyright file | 16:31 |
phoenix24 | ah! ok | 16:31 |
asac | (if 2.1 is the proper license version) | 16:31 |
asac | the warnings should be fine imo | 16:32 |
phoenix24 | ok | 16:32 |
asac | carlos: any update yet? | 16:32 |
carlos | asac: nothing yet, sorry I'm quite busy with something else... | 16:32 |
phoenix24 | asac: Do I need to send mail to the Upstream contact, before pushing it to launchpad ? | 16:35 |
asac | carlos: ok, ic, is there anything i can do? ask kiko for a more official assignment? or maybe there is someone else on your team who could help out? | 16:36 |
asac | phoenix24: no not ... the upstream ping can be done in parallel | 16:36 |
phoenix24 | ok | 16:37 |
asac | if nothing works we can also live without a responsive upstream ... but knowing who to contact is definitly beneficial :) | 16:37 |
phoenix24 | yes | 16:38 |
phoenix24 | asac: I just copied the LICENSE provided by the source into the debian/copyright, that's not acceptable ? | 16:39 |
carlos | asac: well, I'm going to have it done today | 16:39 |
carlos | the only problem is that will not be yet done | 16:39 |
carlos | I mean, right now | 16:39 |
asac | phoenix24: please keep LICENSE in the source | 16:39 |
phoenix24 | but for debian/copyright : I must use the license templates provided : /usr/share/common-licenses/ | 16:39 |
asac | if its just LGPL you don'T need to copy it into debian/copyright | 16:40 |
asac | carlos: ok good ... sorry for bugging you then ... just felt that you are pretty much utilized and wondered if there is anything we can do to help :) | 16:41 |
carlos | asac: let's say that the whole team is pretty much 'utilized' ;-) | 16:42 |
asac | phoenix24: no you just need to refer to the proper license in common-licenses | 16:43 |
phoenix24 | ok | 16:43 |
asac | if the extension uses a license not in that directory you should add the file you want to ship to debian/docs and name that in debian/copyright as well | 16:43 |
phoenix24 | asac: this is how my debian/copyright looks like ==> http://paste.ubuntu.com/5268/ | 16:59 |
asac | carlos: i know ;) | 16:59 |
asac | phoenix24: your text says "he Debian packaging is (C) 2008, Chaitanya Sharma <csharma24@gmail.com> and is licensed under the GPL, see `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1'. | 17:00 |
asac | thats conflciting | 17:00 |
asac | and please nem the real file in "text in /usr/share/doc/speeddial | 17:00 |
asac | " | 17:00 |
asac | thats just the directory | 17:00 |
phoenix24 | this extension is tri licensed, so shouldn't I refer to all the MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1 ? | 17:01 |
asac | just say its "tri-licensed" and refer to the copy you ship in /usr/share/doc/speeddial/ | 17:03 |
asac | phoenix24: no ... if LICENSE says that ... just ship it in that dir and refer to that in the your copyright | 17:03 |
asac | at best license your packaging under the same terms | 17:03 |
asac | (just GPL or LGPL would be fine too though) | 17:03 |
phoenix24 | Licensing is really confusing | 17:05 |
phoenix24_ | debian/copyright varies from package to package, I doubt if there's a standard template for it. | 17:13 |
asac | yes. thats true | 17:16 |
asac | but if you have a LICENSE file its mostly just referring to that | 17:16 |
phoenix24_ | yes! | 17:18 |
phoenix24_ | asac: Is this okay http://paste.ubuntu.com/5270/ ? | 17:24 |
=== phoenix24_ is now known as phoenix24 | ||
=== Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
Ubulette | hi | 18:39 |
Ubulette | [reed], should I change the status of mozilla bug 333308 ? | 20:30 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 333308 in Build Config "make clean and make distclean miss various files" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333308 | 20:30 |
Ubulette | Assigned ? it says resolved | 20:30 |
Ubulette | asac, [reed]: catched the <Hx> issue | 21:58 |
Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/font-bogus.png | 21:58 |
Ubulette | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/font-correct.png | 21:58 |
Ubulette | I've just reloaded the page between the two | 21:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!