| === gryc___ is now known as gryc | ||
| === gryc_ is now known as gryc | ||
| === gryc_ is now known as gryc | ||
| === Fujitsu_ is now known as Fujitsu | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === harrison1 is now known as harrisony | ||
| === soren_ is now known as soren | ||
| === thumper_laptop is now known as thumper | ||
| blizzzek | hi | 09:53 |
|---|---|---|
| blizzzek | can i search in lauchnpad for apps written in a specific language (py e.g. :D) | 09:53 |
| === bigjools-afk is now known as bigjools | ||
| tbf | how do i tell launchpad to reimport my OpenPGP key? | 09:56 |
| tbf | when i enter its fingerprint on https://launchpad.net/~mathias-hasselmann/+editpgpkeys it just tells me to already have that key | 09:56 |
| stdin | just export your key to a keyserver (I use keyserver.ubuntu.com) | 09:57 |
| carlos | morning | 09:58 |
| tbf | stdin: ah, ok. - guess that server should be listed in seahorse | 10:00 |
| tbf | stdin: hey, that worked! thanks alot! | 10:02 |
| stdin | :) | 10:02 |
| tbf | stdin: maybe that launchpad page should tell, that keyserver.ubuntu.com allows uploads | 10:03 |
| stdin | all keyservers do (or should), all they all update from each other | 10:04 |
| === warp10 is now known as warp69 | ||
| tbf | how would i setup a local variant of https://launchpad.net/+builds? | 10:48 |
| tbf | it just takes too long, until packages are accepted/build/rejected | 10:49 |
| tbf | well, it kind of sucks, that you cannot overwrite failed packages | 10:49 |
| tbf | interesting: 0.2.2-0ubuntu1~ppa1 <= 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 | 10:55 |
| Fujitsu | tbf: It takes all of 5 minutes to accept the packages, and then no more than a few minutes after that to build it... | 10:57 |
| Fujitsu | Why are you wanting to overwrite them? | 10:57 |
| Fujitsu | And that is the entire point of ~ | 10:57 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: that i cannot use them to increase the package version for ppa? | 11:07 |
| tbf | Rejected: | 11:07 |
| tbf | MD5 sum of uploaded file does not match existing file in archive | 11:07 |
| tbf | Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. | 11:07 |
| tbf | gnome-lirc-properties_0.2.2-0ubuntu1~ppa2.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0.2.2-0ubuntu1~ppa2 <= 0.2.2-0ubuntu1 | 11:07 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: and i also cannot switch to 0.2.2-0ubuntu2, since the MOTU guys will kill me then | 11:08 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: so i do i replace 0.2.2-0ubuntu1,without creating 0.2.2-0ubuntu2, which will not be accepted by the motu team | 11:09 |
| Fujitsu | tbf: How long have you been waiting for it to bre removed? | 11:12 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: last time i tried it wasn't gone after 30 min, and it was told, that removal is done by a daily cron job | 11:13 |
| Fujitsu | You should be able to upload something lower than something that you've deleted within 20 minutes, I think. | 11:14 |
| Hobbsee | tbf: use 0.2.2-0ubuntu2~ppa1 | 11:21 |
| Hobbsee | or 0.2.2-0ubuntu1+ppa1 | 11:22 |
| tbf | Hobbsee: ah, plus. let's see | 11:29 |
| tbf | Fujitsu, Hobbsee: ok, worked | 11:59 |
| Hobbsee | oh good | 11:59 |
| tbf | but now i wonder, why ppa doesn't install lirc before building the package... | 12:03 |
| tbf | ...lirc is listed as dependency | 12:03 |
| Fujitsu | tbf: Because you didn't specify it in the Build-Depends. | 12:03 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: depends and build-depends aren't merged? | 12:04 |
| Fujitsu | They're completely different, so I'd hope not. | 12:04 |
| Fujitsu | Depends are runtime dependencies. Build-Depends are... build dependencies. | 12:04 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: that's weired. how can runtime dependencies not be part of the build dependencies? | 12:06 |
| Fujitsu | Why would they be? | 12:06 |
| Fujitsu | I don't need to run the program to build it. | 12:06 |
| Fujitsu | Dependencies are also normally largely automatically generated by the build. | 12:06 |
| tbf | well, how to build a program without it's runtime librararies installed... | 12:08 |
| Fujitsu | It depends on the program. | 12:08 |
| tbf | ...seems the need add -dev packages for getting header files hide that detail for me so far... | 12:08 |
| tbf | ...since the -dev packages also pull in the runtime libs | 12:09 |
| Fujitsu | Yes. | 12:09 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: well. debian-typical overdesign | 12:09 |
| Fujitsu | Er, how!? | 12:09 |
| tbf | have to remember this. | 12:09 |
| Fujitsu | What's overdesigned? | 12:09 |
| tbf | this separatation | 12:09 |
| tbf | i won't change it. | 12:09 |
| Fujitsu | cprov: PPA publisher cycles seem really slow now it takes like 5 minutes to get things built :( | 12:09 |
| Fujitsu | Why shouldn't they be separated? | 12:10 |
| tbf | so i'll accept that weirdness, without further thinking about it | 12:10 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: cause separating them breaks configure scripts for instance... | 12:10 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: at least in my special case. | 12:10 |
| Fujitsu | No, you not specifying the build dependencies breaks them. | 12:10 |
| tbf | Fujitsu: i have to figure out now, if i want to relax the configure script, or if i want to add lirc to build-depends and depends | 12:11 |
| Fujitsu | I don't need a bazillion and three X packages to build my Python package, though it may need them at runtime. | 12:11 |
| Fujitsu | tbf: That's correct. | 12:11 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: what ?! | 12:11 |
| cprov | do you mean PPA build cycle (due to the chroot upgrade) ? | 12:12 |
| Fujitsu | No, publishing. | 12:12 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: how do you know ? | 12:12 |
| Fujitsu | Every 20 minutes is now really long compared to everything else. YOu made it all too fast! | 12:13 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: as far as I'm concerned the publishing cycle is taking 58 seconds and that's not slow | 12:13 |
| Fujitsu | I mean how long it appears to take, which is 20 minutes. | 12:13 |
| Fujitsu | Is it not? | 12:13 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: ahh, you mean the frequency is low | 12:13 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: I can do some experiments with 15 or 10 minutes cycle | 12:14 |
| tbf | those pages update automatically? https://launchpad.net/+builds/iridium | 12:14 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: as I said, the publisher takes 1 minute to run (in average) | 12:15 |
| Fujitsu | cprov: That's not bad. A 20 minute frequency used to be great until 1.2.2, when it took an hour or two to get things built anyway. | 12:15 |
| cprov | Fujitsu: I will test other times by the end of the week | 12:18 |
| Fujitsu | cprov: That'd be great! PPA is a whole lot more usable of late, and that would make it that much nicer. | 12:19 |
| cprov | cool | 12:19 |
| tbf | cool. built finally succeeded. | 12:21 |
| === cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
| === thumper_laptop is now known as thumper | ||
| === kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
| TomaszD | carlos, https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/seahorse/+imports is the .pot file being regenerated on build time? How do you check this so that I don't have to bother you each time? | 15:02 |
| carlos | TomaszD: unfortunately, you need extra permissions to see that information... | 15:03 |
| TomaszD | carlos, I seem to recall that the build logs were available somewhere before | 15:03 |
| TomaszD | carlos, anyway, should I file a bug against seahorse or is everything fine? | 15:03 |
| carlos | TomaszD: hmm, buildlogs may be another way to check it, yes | 15:04 |
| carlos | TomaszD: it should be available from launchpad too | 15:04 |
| carlos | but I check a timestamp from where was last updated the template | 15:04 |
| carlos | which is faster for me | 15:04 |
| TomaszD | found the build log, but I don't know what keywords to look for | 15:05 |
| carlos | TomaszD: 2008-02-26 16:50:00.520550+00:00 | 15:05 |
| carlos | that's last update for the template | 15:05 |
| carlos | TomaszD: look for 'template' | 15:06 |
| carlos | or '.pot' | 15:06 |
| carlos | TomaszD: give me the URL and I tell you the exact text to look for | 15:06 |
| TomaszD | ok so it seems everything is correct I guess | 15:06 |
| TomaszD | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12231672/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.seahorse_2.21.92-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 15:06 |
| TomaszD | also, I'm waiting for a user upload to go through for four hours now (909 strings, brasero, https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/brasero/+imports ), should I start worrying? :] | 15:08 |
| TomaszD | I know it used to take a week | 15:08 |
| === warp69 is now known as warp10 | ||
| TomaszD | carlos, are language pack uploads predictable? is there a repo with daily uploads? | 15:14 |
| carlos | TomaszD: it should not take a week... | 15:15 |
| carlos | TomaszD: yeah, pitti's ppa | 15:15 |
| TomaszD | oh cool thanks | 15:15 |
| TomaszD | hmm nope, pitti's ppa doesn't have them | 15:16 |
| carlos | TomaszD: then is better if you check with him | 15:18 |
| carlos | there is a ppa for it | 15:18 |
| TomaszD | ok | 15:18 |
| carlos | TomaszD: hmm, seems like I don't find an easy way to detect missing templates on the build log... | 15:24 |
| carlos | it used to be easy, so maybe I'm missing something. I tried to find it in totem, which we already detected that was not being generated... | 15:24 |
| TomaszD | nevermind, most apps look good, apart from totem | 15:24 |
| TomaszD | yes I've reported that, how are things looking for this package? any fix soon? | 15:24 |
| carlos | TomaszD: I'm not the one fixing it, that's a question for ubuntu developers... | 15:28 |
| TomaszD | oh ok, fine :] | 15:28 |
| TomaszD | I just hope they are aware of this, there are many bugs and this one can be easily missed | 15:28 |
| carlos | TomaszD: ok | 15:37 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| * tbf wonders if ppa could be changed to give more immediate feedback about accepting packages... | 15:59 | |
| tbf | (or rejection) | 15:59 |
| tbf | the mail round trip takes quite some time | 15:59 |
| === gryc_ is now known as gryc | ||
| tbf | "MD5 sum of uploaded file does not match existing file in archive | 16:28 |
| tbf | Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification." | 16:28 |
| tbf | can i browse that archive somehow? | 16:28 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| tbf | is it possible to extract the initially uploaded tarball from ppa? | 16:48 |
| tbf | i only see a tarball with patches applied | 16:48 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === ubotu_ is now known as ubotu | ||
| faulkes- | ok, if I've created a new project in LP, how do I go about getting code into the trunk? | 17:49 |
| mooboo1 | can i change priority on launchpad | 17:51 |
| mooboo1 | so things get "low" ? | 17:51 |
| beuno | faulkes-, you would jus push it | 17:59 |
| beuno | is your code already in bzr? | 17:59 |
| faulkes- | no, the code is not already in bzr | 17:59 |
| faulkes- | new project, no code uploaded yet | 17:59 |
| beuno | faulkes-, https://help.launchpad.net/BzrHowto might be a good start | 18:00 |
| faulkes- | bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: /home/michael/development/ubuntu-server/.bzr/branch/ | 18:00 |
| beuno | faulkes-, do, you haven't versioned your code yet | 18:00 |
| faulkes- | I'll go through that url you listed, then come back if I have issues | 18:01 |
| beuno | go into the dir, and do: bzr init; bzr add; bzr commit -m 'Project start' | 18:01 |
| faulkes- | thanks, sorry, new to using lp and bzr | 18:01 |
| beuno | (or something similar to that) | 18:01 |
| faulkes- | aye | 18:01 |
| beuno | faulkes-, no problem. If you run into bzr-specific issues, you can also drop by #bzr | 18:01 |
| ubotu | New bug: #198828 in launchpad "Upload project file with non-ascii character in the filename breaks the page" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198828 | 18:09 |
| TomaszD | carlos, can you confirm this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/198851 ? | 18:50 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 198851 in avahi ".pot file isn't generated on build time" [Undecided,New] | 18:50 |
| carlos | let me see... | 18:50 |
| carlos | TomaszD: confirmed | 18:53 |
| TomaszD | carlos, ok | 18:53 |
| === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
| TomaszD | carlos, I don't know what to do, is this possible to do https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/198851/comments/1 or do I have to make another bug report about that? It would be pointless I think, before a template is even available | 19:15 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 198851 in avahi ".pot file isn't generated on build time" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 19:15 |
| carlos | TomaszD: well, that's indeed a different bug report... | 19:17 |
| carlos | so is better to file a new bug | 19:17 |
| TomaszD | carlos, fine, I'll do it | 19:17 |
| carlos | if it's fixed before the .pot file is regenerated, it will be there, otherwise... the translations will still be missing, file a new bug and mention it there | 19:17 |
| TomaszD | just did | 19:21 |
| Tonio_ | not sure if it is the right place to talk about that, but I have a problem with my @ubuntu.com email address..... | 19:43 |
| Tonio_ | none of the emails end in my mailbox, even if the smtp trace of the mail sending seems to work | 19:43 |
| Tonio_ | mail accepted by mx.canonical.com | 19:44 |
| Tonio_ | other ubuntu devs reports that it works for them... | 19:44 |
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| andrea-bs | Tonio_: the ubuntu team didn't assign you a mailbox, but only a mail account which redirects to your e-mail address | 19:52 |
| === kuechengarten is now known as thekorn | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| HappyCamp | matsubara, ping | 21:43 |
| HappyCamp | matsubara, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/196253 Do you know to bother about this bug? | 21:44 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 196253 in launchpad "OOPS importing pgp key" [High,New] | 21:44 |
| HappyCamp | s/know to/know who to/ | 21:44 |
| matsubara | Hi HappyCamp | 21:44 |
| HappyCamp | Hello :) | 21:44 |
| matsubara | HappyCamp: I'll raise it up during tomorrow's meeting. I'm afraid we don't have a workaround for it. | 21:46 |
| HappyCamp | Thanks matsubara | 21:47 |
| mpt | Gooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders! | 22:03 |
| jelmer | oh noes, I missed todays "good morning" !? | 22:25 |
| beuno | ^ 22 minutes up there | 22:27 |
| Ubulette | how points are attributed in "Top contributors" of a project page ? | 23:41 |
| Ubulette | I don't understand https://edge.launchpad.net/mozilla-devscripts | 23:42 |
| Ubulette | (based on https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-devscripts/) | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!