| dohboy | is anyone else having trouble with their wifi card with the latest build? | 02:22 |
|---|---|---|
| secretlondon | it's unlikely to affect all wificards, if we do have a prob it's much more likely to affect specific chipsets | 02:23 |
| crimsun | "latest build"? | 02:23 |
| crimsun | if you're running hardy, see the topic of #ubuntu+1. | 02:23 |
| secretlondon | I presume he means currently updated | 02:23 |
| dohboy | thx | 02:23 |
| secretlondon | ah that would be useful to know here too | 02:24 |
| dohboy | ah, the topic in #ubuntu+1 explains everything.. thanks :) | 02:24 |
| crimsun | yep, that's why I set it. | 02:26 |
| secretlondon | crimsun: is there a main bug for "network manager in hardy is broken"? | 03:07 |
| crimsun | yes | 03:09 |
| secretlondon | 198971? | 03:11 |
| secretlondon | bug #198971 | 03:11 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 198971 in network-manager "[Hardy] Wireless broken with latests updates" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198971 | 03:11 |
| crimsun | (yes, I just triaged it and its dupe) | 03:12 |
| secretlondon | ok I've just set priority to 'high' on it to take it easier to find | 03:13 |
| secretlondon | it'll take a while for the fix to get out so we'll prob get loads of dupes | 03:13 |
| crimsun | thanks :) | 03:13 |
| Jimerson | Good evening all. | 03:16 |
| secretlondon | evening | 03:18 |
| Jimerson | I have been reading through the wiki and I am interested in trying to help with bug Triaging. | 03:19 |
| secretlondon | cool | 03:19 |
| Jimerson | I was wondering how I could go about finding a mentor.. | 03:19 |
| secretlondon | there isn't a formal mentoring process although this channel is a good place to ask questions | 03:20 |
| secretlondon | there is a hug day tomorrow which is a day dedicated to squashing bugs on particular packages | 03:20 |
| Jimerson | I was reading about that. | 03:21 |
| secretlondon | there will be more people around in the channel | 03:21 |
| Jimerson | Can you point me in a good place to get started? | 03:21 |
| Jimerson | All the bugs I have seen so far someone has responded to. | 03:22 |
| secretlondon | tomorrow there will be a list of bugs to work through | 03:22 |
| secretlondon | I think a hug day is a good place to start | 03:23 |
| Jimerson | Sounds good. | 03:23 |
| secretlondon | ogra: main inclusion request filed on sdlpango to fix tuxtype ftbfs | 03:45 |
| * techno_freak visits #ubuntu-bugs-announce | 03:58 | |
| === keescook_ is now known as keescook | ||
| === boomer` is now known as boomer | ||
| greg-g | bug 162470 | 05:21 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 162470 in amarok "Amarok can't fast-forward FLAC files." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162470 | 05:21 |
| === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Hug Day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080306 | Ubuntu BugSquad | Bug announcements have moved to #ubuntu-bugs-announce | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ - http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad | ||
| === bigon` is now known as bigon | ||
| elmargol | bug #191512 | 09:43 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 191512 in nautilus "gnome displays nfs mounts on the desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191512 | 09:43 |
| elmargol | very anoying bug | 09:43 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| dholbach | bdmurray, thekorn: hey guys, could it be that LPTask.remote is always 'False' in textbugs? | 10:19 |
| thekorn | dholbach, hi, yes that's true, | 10:23 |
| thekorn | i did not know the text interface gives us this information | 10:23 |
| dholbach | thekorn: oh I don't know either if that information is available :) | 10:24 |
| dholbach | there's watch: <url> | 10:24 |
| thekorn | dholbach, ok, I will try to add this to the text mode | 10:28 |
| * dholbach hugs thekorn | 10:28 | |
| dholbach | bring it on! | 10:28 |
| * thekorn hugs dholbach | 10:28 | |
| thekorn | dholbach, I think that's it: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/58584/ | 10:43 |
| dholbach | thekorn: that looks great | 10:46 |
| thekorn | ok, let me commit it | 10:47 |
| dholbach | rock on | 10:47 |
| thekorn | bdmurray, dholbach: pushed as revision 73 | 10:49 |
| dholbach | thanks thekorn :) | 10:50 |
| Iulian | Hi | 11:47 |
| techno_freak | Iulian, hi | 12:06 |
| Iulian | Heya techno_freak | 12:09 |
| Iulian | And heno | 12:09 |
| heno | hey Iulian | 12:10 |
| Iulian | heno: Btw, did you get my last mail? | 12:14 |
| Iulian | Uhmm, I didn't see pedro recently, is he on vacation? | 12:14 |
| heno | Iulian: I did. I'll activate it now | 12:15 |
| heno | pedro is at a FOSS conference in Peru I think | 12:16 |
| Iulian | Makes sense now. | 12:17 |
| Iulian | heno: Thanks. | 12:17 |
| Iulian | Woahh! | 13:03 |
| Iulian | elmargol: Please fix your connection. | 13:04 |
| techno_freak | he he | 13:08 |
| qense | happy hug day! | 13:51 |
| Gnine | system > preferences > screen resolution INOP | system > administration > screens and graphics INOP | 8.04 2.6.24-11-generic amd64 x86_64 | 13:57 |
| Gnine | nvidia proprietary driver in use | 13:58 |
| afflux | morning | 14:01 |
| qense | test: bug #1 | 14:08 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 1 in ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 | 14:08 |
| qense | that still works | 14:08 |
| Iulian | It works in all Ubuntu channels. | 14:12 |
| qense | ok | 14:13 |
| qense | I didn't know that :), thx | 14:13 |
| afflux | How to handle a bug in the kernel that has been fixed in 2.6.24 but someone likes to see a fix for 2.6.22? | 14:43 |
| james_w | afflux: you mean in gutsy? | 14:48 |
| afflux | I think so | 14:49 |
| james_w | afflux: what's the bug number? | 14:49 |
| afflux | james_w: bug 196340 | 14:49 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 196340 in linux-source-2.6.22 "Unable to handle kernel paging request" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196340 | 14:49 |
| james_w | afflux: yeah, that's gutsy. That would require an SRU | 14:54 |
| james_w | I'm not sure what the kernel teams SRU policies are. | 14:55 |
| afflux | ah, just found "KernelUpdates" in the wik | 14:56 |
| afflux | *wiki | 14:56 |
| bdmurray | Hello bug huggers! It sure is nice and quiet here | 16:32 |
| bdmurray | I meant w/o ubotu | 16:32 |
| bdmurray | afflux: did you get your question about kernel SRUs answered? | 16:33 |
| afflux | hi brian | 16:34 |
| bdmurray | hello | 16:35 |
| afflux | basicly, yes. however I wasn't entirely sure how to handle this in the bug and I ran out of time | 16:35 |
| bdmurray | It sounds to me like they are running their own kernel, even with 2.6.22. Did you get that impression? | 16:37 |
| bdmurray | Okay, I read more. | 16:40 |
| bdmurray | Anyway, kernel SRUs are very rare as a regression could impact everyone. | 16:42 |
| Iulian | bdmurray: Yes, indeed, much better without ubotu messages. :) | 16:45 |
| afflux | bdmurray: the custom kernel was my impression, too. | 16:48 |
| bdmurray | I'm not certain how important it is in this case as he says its fixed in 2.6.24 and it isn't sru worthy. | 16:49 |
| bdmurray | One thing that might be interesting to know is which specifc kernel flavors he tested as they have different config options. | 16:50 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: you just touched bug 196340 - can you tell from the oops report if the crash is specific to the vserver patches? | 17:12 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 196340 in linux "Unable to handle kernel paging request" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196340 | 17:12 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I can't tell with any certainty | 17:14 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: okay, it seems like we would have heard about this before. would the specific kernel version matter or is generic sufficient? | 17:16 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I think he commented about the specific version | 17:17 |
| ogasawara | 2.6.22-14.47 | 17:18 |
| bdmurray | Did I mean kernel flavor? | 17:18 |
| bdmurray | That changes the build options right? | 17:19 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: yes, but I think generic should be fine | 17:19 |
| bdmurray | okay, thanks! | 17:20 |
| bdmurray | crimsun: does the alsa-info script reveal whether or not someone has l-u-m installed? | 17:48 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: is there a xen version of 2.6.24 yet? Where would I check myself? | 18:01 |
| ogasawara | there is - linux-image-2.6.24-11-xen | 18:02 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: ^^^ | 18:02 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: but there is no live CD with that kernel so they'd have to install to test hardy... | 18:05 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: unfortunately yes | 18:05 |
| bdmurray | mabye we should add that under the stock reply on the hug day wiki page then | 18:06 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: good idea | 18:06 |
| bdmurray | what about -rt that should be on ubuntu studio right? | 18:07 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: not sure on that one, but I can check | 18:07 |
| bdmurray | I'm not sure what their build cycle in regards to images is like | 18:08 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: just checked the manifest and it looks like -rt is used | 18:09 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: Uh, overclocking == weird things can happen right? | 18:15 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I'd think so | 18:16 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: does "NCQ disabled due to excessive errors" sound familiar to you? | 18:59 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: it does - which bug? | 19:00 |
| bdmurray | bug 156669 and bug 121273 | 19:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 156669 in linux-source-2.6.22 "SATA drive freezes when using LVM over dm-crypt" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/156669 | 19:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 121273 in linux-source-2.6.22 "kernel panic with dm-crypt/luks + lvm + xfs + ubuntu kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121273 | 19:00 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: I found bug 147858 related to ncq do you know what rtg's changelog comment means? "Add WD WD800ADFS NCQ horkage quirk support" | 19:39 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 147858 in linux "western digital WD800ADFS ncq problems" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/147858 | 19:39 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: was added to the blacklist | 19:40 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: that was the NCQ bug I was thinking of which seemed different from the two you referenced | 19:40 |
| === ember_ is now known as ember | ||
| === stefanb_l is now known as smb_l | ||
| * secretlondon has had some pizza and is ready to start on bugs :) | 21:38 | |
| greg-g | pizza and bugs, a powerful combination | 21:38 |
| secretlondon | indeed! | 21:38 |
| * Iulian is starving | 21:39 | |
| bdmurray | mmm pizza | 21:39 |
| greg-g | look what you started secretlondon! | 21:39 |
| secretlondon | :) | 21:39 |
| Nafallo | ugh | 21:39 |
| Nafallo | !pizza | 21:40 |
| ubotu | Sorry, I don't know anything about pizza - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi | 21:40 |
| Iulian | Yeah, you shouldn't say anything about it! | 21:40 |
| Iulian | Bad bad! | 21:40 |
| Nafallo | stupid bot :-P | 21:40 |
| secretlondon | Nafallo you said you had pizza yesterday | 21:40 |
| Nafallo | secretlondon: yea, exactly. | 21:40 |
| Nafallo | secretlondon: ! == not | 21:40 |
| * secretlondon will be having pizza tomorrow too! | 21:40 | |
| secretlondon | as I bought a big one | 21:40 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: is there a pattern bad memory exhibits in a kernel call trace? | 21:42 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I don't know of any | 21:42 |
| crimsun | bdmurray: (RE: "does the alsa-info script reveal whether or not someone has l-u-m installed") yes, it does, but not directly | 21:54 |
| crimsun | bdmurray: it's normally fairly straightforward to ferret out by inspecting the reported kernel and alsa-driver versions | 21:55 |
| crimsun | bdmurray: granted, now that alsa is completely in l-u-m, we'll have to revisit the logic. But for gutsy, at least, we can tell whether l-u-m and/or l-b-m are/is installed. | 21:56 |
| bdmurray | crimsun: okay, I don't recall which bug I was specifically looking at | 22:06 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: how do I know if a driver is in l-u-m or not? | 22:34 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: you can look at the lum git tree | 22:35 |
| bdmurray | gitweb is hard | 22:37 |
| ogra_cmpc | bdmurray, dpkg -S /path/to/.ko | 22:38 |
| bdmurray | ogra_cmpc: thanks, that's a bit better | 22:39 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: How would I check the upstream kernel to see if a PCI ID is supported by a driver? | 22:45 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I usually just inspect the driver in the upstream git tree | 22:46 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: which driver and which pci id are you looking for? | 22:46 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: and you have it checked out I guess? cx88 and 1822:0023 | 22:47 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: yup | 22:47 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: just a sec, pulling in the latest changes | 22:48 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I'm not seeing it | 22:55 |
| bdmurray | and what about 1421 0334 | 22:55 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: .subvendor = 0x1421, | 22:56 |
| ogasawara | .subdevice = 0x0334, | 22:56 |
| ogasawara | .card = CX88_BOARD_ADSTECH_DVB_T_PCI, | 22:56 |
| bdmurray | that's in cx88-core? | 22:57 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: cx88-cards.c | 22:57 |
| bdmurray | right, I misclicked | 22:57 |
| bdmurray | don't most drivers use the vendor and device id - not the subsystem? | 22:59 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: what about 1002:00f9 ? | 23:06 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I don't see that vendor id, what vendor is it? | 23:07 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI? | 23:08 |
| bdmurray | yeah, 14f1:8800 | 23:08 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I don't see 00f9, only 00f8 | 23:09 |
| ogasawara | .subvendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, | 23:09 |
| ogasawara | .subdevice = 0x00f8, | 23:09 |
| ogasawara | .card = CX88_BOARD_ATI_WONDER_PRO, | 23:09 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: 14f1:8800 I don't see | 23:10 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: do you have stock needs upstream reporting reply? | 23:21 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: sorta, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies - last few sentences of the "Reporting Bugs Upstream" section | 23:22 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: last few sentences of the first paragraph | 23:22 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: are you wanting to add the new device id's? | 23:23 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: I know the kernel guys will sometimes add them and then push the patch back upstream | 23:23 |
| bdmurray | yeah, there is one I'm 90% certain of | 23:24 |
| bdmurray | I mean I know it doesn't exist and it seems like it should | 23:24 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: if you can post a comment summarizing id's should be added then let me know the lp bug # I'll add it to the kernel list for next week | 23:24 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: its bug 115719 | 23:31 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 115719 in linux-source-2.6.20 "CX23880 PCI Video and Audio Decoder insmod failure" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/115719 | 23:31 |
| bdmurray | eh, I'll fix the summary too | 23:31 |
| bdmurray | ogasawara: I've found a bug that is fixed post 2.6.20. Do you think it is worthing opening other affects for it just showing that it is fixed? | 23:42 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: yah. I typically open the task it was fixed against and mark it so | 23:42 |
| ogasawara | bdmurray: then I usually "won't fix" the older task assuming it's not a sru candidate | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!