=== secretlondon is now known as sl_fail
=== sl_fail is now known as secretlondon
[01:05] <greg-g> is there a way of saying "yes, this private bug needs to stay private due to there being a password/something sensitive available in it" without actually putting that in a comment?  Like a "Really Private?" confirmation
[01:06] <greg-g> I don't have one, but I was just thinking that I might come across a bug which someone has already checked and they did see some sensitive data and just left it private with no comment.  If they would set a "confirmed private" tag or something then I wouldn't bother with that part.
[01:06] <bdmurray> greg-g: no there isn't, that's interesting
[01:08] <bdmurray> greg-g: maybe we could use a bug tag for that
[01:08] <greg-g> bdmurray: it isn't a huge deal at the moment, I was just thinking out loud
[01:08] <greg-g> yeah, already implemented, easy
[01:09] <bdmurray> do you have an idea of how many privates there are at the moment?
[01:09] <greg-g> I do not
[01:09] <greg-g> I just come across them during the pre-canned searches
[01:10] <bdmurray> right
[01:13] <bdmurray> I'm not even sure it is easily queryable
[01:13] <greg-g> yeah, not in advanced search
[01:19] <greg-g> what package are hotkey issues assigned to?
[01:20] <greg-g> hotkey-setup
[01:20] <bdmurray> it depends really
[01:22] <greg-g> I thought it would be linux for bug 199682
[01:22] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199682 in ubuntu "Asus F5N laptop Special keys not working with asus-laptop kernel module" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199682
[01:24] <bdmurray> Well, the package would be linux-source-2.6.22 but the kernel is right.
[01:24] <greg-g> right right
[01:24] <bdmurray> It looks like we ship that module and they should really test with Hardy
[01:25]  * greg-g nods
[01:29] <blueyed> regarding add-5-a-day, would it be a better default to not commit/update, if this has been done in the last hour?
=== KwisatzHaderac1 is now known as KwisatzH
=== _emgent is now known as emgent
[05:54] <secretlondon> It's a great feeling to close multiple bugs fixed by something you did :)
[06:59] <fishor> Hi all! do some body know, will SCIM in hardy replace keyboard applet ?
[07:00] <secretlondon> no idea, sorry
[07:01] <secretlondon> ubuntu+1 might know
[07:06] <fishor> i have issue with russian layout, so i do not knwo where to assign this bug
[07:07] <secretlondon> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKeyboardDetection might help
[07:09] <fishor> not really, this is not the hardware issue
[07:12] <secretlondon> I don't know, tbh
[07:15] <fishor> bdmurray: hi Brian! do you know some thing about SCIM? If you still wake
[09:06] <Iulian> G'morning.
[11:01] <fishor> morning
[11:31] <Knightlust> i miss ubotu... heh
[11:34] <Iulian> I don't. It's in #ubuntu-bugs-announce
[11:47] <Seveas> Knightlust, ubotu's still here ;)
[11:48] <Seveas> !hi | Knightlust
[11:48] <ubotu> Knightlust: Hi! Welcome to #ubuntu-bugs!
[11:48] <Knightlust> Seveas: hehe, it's just that im used to seeing new bugs here.. i'll need to get used to seeing new bugs at announce
[11:56] <afflux> morning
[12:08] <milos_> can someone help me, i have a problem with debugging
[12:18] <geser> milos_: what kind of problem?
[12:19] <milos_> geser: what package I need to install: Loaded symbols for /lib/libthread_db.so.1
[12:19] <milos_> (no debugging symbols found)
[12:19] <milos_> 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
[12:20] <milos_> i have searched with synaptic but don't find anything similar with libthread
[12:24] <geser> milos_: dpkg -S /lib/libthread_db.so.1 gives libc6
[12:25] <geser> so you need the debugging symbols for libc6
[12:25] <geser> but usually the error lies before libc6 like a wrong call of a libc6 function
[12:26] <milos_> ok, because i have libc6 installed(-dbg, -dev....)
[12:27] <milos_> thanks
[12:42] <afflux> Which part of the system is responsible for loading snd_ modules?
[12:43] <afflux> Bug 199793 is about snd-hda-intel which doesn't seem to be loaded automatically
[12:43] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199793 in ubuntu "8.10 Alpha 6: No sound with ALC883" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199793
[12:44] <afflux> (at least I think so, but it could be a problem with wrong module options too)
[15:14] <bddebian> Boo
[15:48] <askand> Hi, If I write in terminal for example "sudo apti" and then press tab to autocomplete, it doesnt work.. can someone confirm that bug?
[16:06] <lfs-livecd> heya
[16:07] <lfs-livecd> :(
[19:08] <afflux> anyone able to open bug 199911?
[19:08] <ubotu> Bug 199911 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/199911 is private
[19:18] <greg-g> I am not, it must be uber-private
[19:18] <qense> it probably containst an apport report
[19:18] <greg-g> I am allowed to see those reports
[19:18] <qense> oh
[19:19] <greg-g> yeah, weird
[19:19] <greg-g> anywho, gotta run, later
[19:20] <qense> bye
[19:20] <afflux> qense: me too
[19:20] <afflux> that's why I wonder
[19:20] <qense> oh
[19:22] <andrea-bs> maybe a security bug?
[19:22] <afflux> qense: It was filed because I asked for another crash report in bug 190428, so this is definetly a ubuntu bug, so ubuntu-bugcontrol *should* have access
[19:22] <afflux> are security bugs private and invisible for -bugcontrol?
[19:23] <andrea-bs> I am not sure
[19:23] <qense> I think if it are major security issues there is a change that that could be
[19:23] <afflux> me neither.
[19:23] <afflux> anyway, dinner now.
[19:23] <qense> there is a specila ubuntu securtiy team
[19:23] <qense> have a nice dinner :)
[19:24] <afflux> ty :)
[19:25] <andrea-bs> bug 152060 is a security issue
[19:25] <andrea-bs> I'm the submitter so I can view it
[19:27] <qense> how do you mark yourself as away in XCHat?
[19:28] <andrea-bs> /away Message
[19:29] <qense> ok
[19:29] <qense> and how do you return?
[19:29] <qense> just post something?
[19:29] <andrea-bs> /back
[19:30] <qense> ok, thx
[19:30] <andrea-bs> you're welcome
[19:54] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 190428 in emerald "emerald crashed on "alt-tab" windows switching" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190428
[19:54] <ubotu> Bug 152060 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/152060 is private
[19:55] <qense> why does that bug appears here?
[19:56] <afflux> guess ubotu hat a huge lag
[19:56] <afflux> I mentioned that one about 30 minutes ago
[19:57] <andrea-bs> afflux: can you view bug 152060?
[19:57] <ubotu> Bug 152060 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/152060 is private
[19:58] <afflux> no.
[19:58] <andrea-bs> so, qense, your bug is a security bug ;)
[19:58] <afflux> it was mine ;)
[19:59] <andrea-bs> oh, sorry
[20:00] <afflux> okay, I told the reporter to unmark it as a security issue since it's supposed to be about a crashing emerald
[20:00] <afflux> anyway, I'm off for a pioneers game ;)
[20:02] <warren_> hi
[20:02] <qense> hello
[20:02] <warren_> can someone have a look at this bug: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/164/  ?
[20:02] <warren_> eurm no sorry
[20:03] <warren_> this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/156031
[20:03] <warren_> ^^
[20:03] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 156031 in gdebi "Kubuntu - GDebi fails to install .deb package" [Undecided,New]
[20:04] <qense> it can be confirmed I think, since two people are having the same problem
[20:05] <andrea-bs> it's not a gdebi issue
[20:05] <andrea-bs> python-kde3: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kparts.so
[20:06] <warren_> erm
[20:06] <warren_> an issue with what then?
[20:06] <warren_> python, kparts?
[20:06] <andrea-bs> python-kde3
[20:07] <warren_> ok
[20:07] <warren_> and what is the problem?
[20:07] <andrea-bs> I don't know
[20:08] <warren_> ok
[20:08] <andrea-bs> I'm a gnome user
[20:08] <andrea-bs> ;)
[20:08] <warren_> ^^
[20:08] <warren_> i was ;)
[20:09] <qense> so the bug needs to be reassigned to another package and after you know the version or their python-kde3 copy it can be confirmed  I think
[20:10] <warren_> owkay
[20:10] <andrea-bs> yeah, qense
[20:10] <qense> if the developers need more information they can ask for it, but if you don't confim the bug they'll never look at it
[20:11] <qense> and that would be a waste of the bug report
[20:11] <andrea-bs> I think the bug needs debugging symbols
[20:11] <andrea-bs> I have to check
[20:12] <qense> maybe they have to try to reproduce the bug while gdebi is in verbose mode?
[20:13] <andrea-bs> no, because we have a complete backtrace
[20:14] <qense> yeah, the backtrace is quite complete
[20:14] <andrea-bs> warren_: can you reproduce the bug?
[20:17] <warren_> what do you mean?
[20:17] <warren_> yes
[20:18] <andrea-bs> can I ask you some questions?
[20:18] <warren_> yes
[20:20] <warren_> ??
[20:20] <andrea-bs> type this command please:
[20:20] <andrea-bs> python -c "from kparts import konsolePart,TerminalInterface"
[20:21] <warren_> yes
[20:21] <andrea-bs> does it show some errors?
[20:21] <warren_> no
[20:21] <warren_> by doing this command?
[20:21] <andrea-bs> yes
[20:21] <warren_> no
[20:22] <andrea-bs> ok, now run
[20:22] <andrea-bs> python -c "from GDebi.GDebiKDE import GDebiKDE"
[20:22] <warren_> in root or not?
[20:22] <andrea-bs> not
[20:22] <warren_> ok
[20:22] <andrea-bs> errors?
[20:22] <warren_> did both
[20:23] <warren_> no
[20:23] <andrea-bs> ok, that's a gdebi issue, I was wrong
[20:23] <warren_> :p
[20:23] <andrea-bs> thanks for your help
[20:23] <warren_> no problem
[20:24] <warren_> but someone said me last time that it worked on his installaion
[20:24] <warren_> but i'm not the only one :s
[20:25] <warren_> http://pastebin.ca/934387
[20:25] <warren_> this is the log
[20:25] <warren_> but when launching gdebi-kde in terminal it works a bit further without exiting but doenst' install at all
[20:26] <andrea-bs> how did you obtain the log you have pasted?
[20:27] <warren_> sudo gdebi-kde package.deb &> /home/Me/log
[20:28] <andrea-bs> it's different from the one attached in the bug
[20:28] <warren_> hm
=== warren_ is now known as elwario
=== txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger
[21:06] <nixternal> bdmurray: you around right now?
[21:06] <nixternal> anyone here using editmoin?
[21:12] <jjesse> good news is that i'm finding less and less in the amount of bugs i actually know how to troubleshoot
[21:12] <jjesse> i wonder if that is a good sign
[21:12] <nixternal> always :)
[21:12] <nixternal> I am trying to figure out this damn editmoin and getting it configured with the wiki
[21:13] <jjesse> ah never used editmoin
[21:28] <pochu> nixternal: 'man editmoin' has good documentation ;)
[21:28] <nixternal> I got that much, but I can't figure out the cookie crap
[21:28] <nixternal> I don't have any id's similar to the one listed in the manpage
[21:30] <jjesse> nixternal: of course if the documentation isn't good enough you could always update it to make it better
[21:30] <jjesse> :)
[21:30] <nixternal> I think I am on to something now
[21:30] <pochu> nixternal: firefox?
[21:31] <nixternal> oh no, I don't mess with that evilness :)
[21:31] <pochu> then I don't think I can help you :P
[21:32] <pochu_> hi
[21:32] <pochu> bye
[21:32] <pochu_> :)
[21:32] <nixternal> b00yah
[21:32] <nixternal> want to know the problem?
[21:33] <nixternal> TYPO!!!
[21:33] <nixternal> haha
[21:33] <jjesse> report a bug on it then ;)
[22:11] <bdmurray> nixternal: what's up?
[22:11] <nixternal> sorry, forgot to tell you to unping there...had a question about editmoin but I figured it out
[22:11] <bdmurray> nixternal: I finally caught up, I'm glad it is working for you now.
[23:11] <darx> hi how can i install the sysprof-module? sysprof needs it. I'm trying to help with this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yelp/+bug/199860
[23:12] <darx> would I have to build it from source?
[23:15] <afflux> good night
[23:30] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199860 in yelp "High CPU usage by yelp" [Medium,Incomplete]