| azeem | hrm | 01:15 |
|---|---|---|
| azeem | what happens if I upload a source packages to PPA but forget the .orig.tar.gz? | 01:15 |
| slangasek | mrh | 01:15 |
| azeem | I mean, will I have to bug people, or can I just rebuild the package with -sa and reupload | 01:15 |
| azeem | or do I have to bump version numbers | 01:16 |
| slangasek | it was rejected, then? | 01:16 |
| slangasek | or what? | 01:16 |
| azeem | dunno, it was only a few minutes ago | 01:16 |
| azeem | this was the first time I tried to upload something to PPA | 01:16 |
| azeem | ah | 01:17 |
| azeem | rejected | 01:17 |
| azeem | bah | 01:17 |
| azeem | Unable to find distroseries: unstable | 01:17 |
| slangasek | ah, really? I have no recollection of using -sa when uploading a package to PPA; but maybe yours is an .orig.tar.gz that's not in the archive... oh, or it could be rejected for an unrelated reason ;) | 01:17 |
| azeem | slangasek: yeah, am trying to get the opensync-0.22 packages compiled for hardy | 01:18 |
| slangasek | s/archive/library/ | 01:18 |
| azeem | but apparently I have to add bogus changelog entries with "hardy" in it for that | 01:18 |
| slangasek | azeem: no, you just need a .changes that points at hardy | 01:18 |
| azeem | ah, that'd work as well then | 01:18 |
| azeem | thanks | 01:18 |
| soundray | Hi, I've been assigned a bug and don't know why. What should I do? | 01:19 |
| slangasek | soundray: well, you might want to mention the bug # for starters :) | 01:20 |
| azeem | Subject: [PPA debian-opensync] Accepted: opensync 0.22-2 (source) | 01:20 |
| azeem | yay | 01:20 |
| soundray | slangasek: #457246 | 01:20 |
| slangasek | soundray: um... is that a Debian bug number? | 01:20 |
| slangasek | it's not a Launchpad bug number | 01:21 |
| soundray | slangasek: yes... but the email was sent to the address I use on launchpad. | 01:21 |
| soundray | I guess it's just a mistake. I know hardly anything about netatalk :) | 01:21 |
| azeem | soundray: what's your launchpad login and/or the address you use on it? | 01:22 |
| soundray | azeem: soundray; ubuntubug@soundray.de | 01:23 |
| azeem | weird | 01:23 |
| slangasek | soundray: that's very strange, the only related open bug I see on netatalk source is bug #195011, which is not linked to the Debian version and not assigned to you | 01:23 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 195011 in netatalk "netatalk fails assertion, afpd won't launch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195011 | 01:23 |
| slangasek | oh, are you perhaps in the bugsquad group? | 01:23 |
| soundray | slangasek: no. | 01:23 |
| azeem | soundray: if it was a mail you got, maybe you can put it on a pastebin | 01:24 |
| soundray | I've only ever reported a few bugs in feisty (unrelated) | 01:24 |
| slangasek | soundray: ah, heh, there's the problem - you have a login named "ubuntubug" :) | 01:24 |
| azeem | slangasek: do you think there's a realistic chance in getting opensync-0.22 into hardy? | 01:25 |
| soundray | azeem: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/58823/ | 01:25 |
| slangasek | soundray: so yes, someone mistook you for the Ubuntu bug squad; "ubuntubug" seems like a poor choice of a launchpad ID :) | 01:25 |
| slangasek | azeem: hmm, how do I answer that objectively... :) | 01:26 |
| soundray | slangasek: okay, that would explain it | 01:26 |
| soundray | I guess it's safe to ignore -- or should I pass it on to someone? | 01:27 |
| slangasek | safe to ignore, it's already been reassigned to the correct party | 01:28 |
| soundray | slangasek, azeem: thanks for your help. | 01:28 |
| === ^4nDr3s is now known as RoAkSoAx | ||
| emgent | heya | 02:40 |
| Exfil | i need help porting Photoshop cs2 to gusty, i have the adobe folder in the program files directory under wine but i cant seem to get the right registry key imported, when cs2 loads up it says it is unactivated, but it is activated on the xp machine | 02:57 |
| nixternal | Exfil: this is far from the correct channel to ask for such support, your best bet would be #winehq | 02:59 |
| bddebian | Heya gang | 03:16 |
| emgent | heya :P | 03:22 |
| bddebian | Hi emgent | 03:29 |
| protonchris | Hello | 03:30 |
| bddebian | Hi protonchris | 03:36 |
| LaserJock | evening all | 04:40 |
| protonchris | Hello | 04:41 |
| bddebian | Heya LaserJock | 04:41 |
| LaserJock | bddebian: dude, I'm doing some openGL programming | 04:42 |
| LaserJock | if this works I'll be pretty impressed | 04:42 |
| bddebian | LaserJock: Rock On man! | 04:56 |
| LaserJock | bddebian: in C++ no less | 04:59 |
| LaserJock | I haven't gotten it all figured out yet though | 04:59 |
| LaserJock | I'm learning about nurbs | 05:00 |
| === _emgent is now known as emgent | ||
| bddebian | C++ makes my head hurt :) | 05:03 |
| Hobbsee | ScottK: it's not even binary mangling.... | 06:51 |
| Hobbsee | ScottK: it only showed as core dev because you uploaded a source that said that's waht the maintainer was... | 06:51 |
| sparr_ | is there a channel for help with apt pinning? | 07:06 |
| Hobbsee | #ubuntu, etc | 07:12 |
| Hobbsee | sparr_: man dpkg, to the section on "set-selections" usually | 07:12 |
| sparr_ | well, more with apt than with dpkg | 07:12 |
| sparr_ | thanks though | 07:12 |
| slangasek | dpkg --set-selections lets you hold packages, it doesn't do pinning | 07:12 |
| sparr_ | ok, how about a contradiction between the man page for apt* and the workings of current versions? | 07:13 |
| sparr_ | forget it | 07:14 |
| sparr_ | i give up | 07:14 |
| Hobbsee | i wonder why we don't have "this is not another #ubuntu, we don't do general support here" in the topic | 07:15 |
| Iulian | G'morning. | 09:06 |
| === tb1 is now known as tbf | ||
| slomo | superm1: what exactly is the reason why mythtv is in multiverse? | 09:18 |
| superm1 | slomo, two things | 09:19 |
| superm1 | lame | 09:19 |
| superm1 | and the ffmpeg that is shipped within it | 09:19 |
| slomo | superm1: also you can give me debdiffs for new uploads, that's easier than mentors i guess ;) | 09:19 |
| Fujitsu | Argh, more embedded ffmpeg? | 09:19 |
| slomo | superm1: hm... couldn't those be stripped (and build against system ffmpeg)? | 09:19 |
| superm1 | slomo, well whichever you'd prefer | 09:19 |
| superm1 | well lame yes - it's a very ugly patch to do so, but a mandriva guy wrote one | 09:20 |
| superm1 | the ffmpeg unfortunately can't use the system wide one | 09:20 |
| slomo | superm1: i prefer debdiff ;) | 09:20 |
| superm1 | they have some enhancements that upstream hasn't accepted | 09:20 |
| slomo | great | 09:20 |
| superm1 | not to mention now its built against faac/faad too | 09:21 |
| superm1 | and liba52 | 09:21 |
| slomo | :) | 09:21 |
| Fujitsu | superm1: Can't you kick upstream into being sane? | 09:21 |
| superm1 | Fujitsu, i've tried. | 09:22 |
| tbf | so let's see if my inet is reliable enough today for uploading next gnome-lirc-properties iteration | 09:22 |
| superm1 | so some of these things could be loosened, but the functionality of the app goes down greatly | 09:22 |
| superm1 | tbf, i'm looking it over right now | 09:22 |
| Fujitsu | I guess that does rely on ffmpeg upstream not being stupid, though L( | 09:22 |
| Fujitsu | *:( | 09:22 |
| RAOF | Fujitsu: Don't the ffmpeg developers recommend embedding it? | 09:22 |
| slomo | superm1: ok, unless upstream is a bit saner it has to be in multiverse, yes ;) can't they go a modular way, having all problematic bits in another source package? ;) | 09:22 |
| tbf | superm1: how that? 0.2.4 upload failed | 09:22 |
| superm1 | i just dget'ed it right now | 09:22 |
| superm1 | it built | 09:23 |
| superm1 | the one from march 5th | 09:23 |
| Fujitsu | RAOF: Considering they don't have any kind of API stability, probably. | 09:23 |
| superm1 | Fujitsu, RAOF yeah they regularly merge with upstream, but recommend staying away from the tree for ~2-3 weeks to sort out problems from API stability | 09:23 |
| slomo | siretart: what's the plan with experimental's ffmpeg (and ubuntu)? :) | 09:24 |
| superm1 | slomo, well after hardy comes out, i'm going to redo all of the packaging | 09:24 |
| RAOF | Because it's obviously impossible to have a fast multimedia library with a stable API >:( | 09:24 |
| superm1 | during that time i'll see about loosening deps | 09:24 |
| superm1 | and seeing how nicely it comes across | 09:24 |
| slomo | RAOF: not really... it just needs some work and thinking ;) | 09:25 |
| RAOF | That obviously needed a <sarcasm> tag :) | 09:25 |
| superm1 | haha | 09:25 |
| superm1 | but assuming that it keeps an embedded ffmpeg, this will still be a bit messy | 09:26 |
| slomo | superm1: found the upnp-mythtv patch for totem? | 09:26 |
| slomo | superm1: also, if you have a debian-compatible mythtv package please tell me ;) | 09:26 |
| superm1 | slomo, i've been busy all week with some other stuff, it | 09:26 |
| superm1 | 's on my list for tomorrow :) | 09:27 |
| tbf | hah! i am smarter than this broken vodafone router with its aborted connections and than revu's ftp server with its do-not-overwrite policiy | 09:33 |
| * tbf rsynched to his vhost and run dput from there :-D | 09:33 | |
| slomo | superm1: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516672 | 09:34 |
| ubotu | Gnome bug 516672 in Plugins "gmyth upnp" [Enhancement,Unconfirmed] | 09:34 |
| superm1 | ah thanks | 09:34 |
| superm1 | i'll give that a go | 09:34 |
| tbf | superm1: uh, you commented in the meantime :-D | 09:35 |
| tbf | superm1: cool, debian/ubuntu also start to add homepage fields to control files now? | 09:37 |
| superm1 | tbf, yeah | 09:37 |
| slangasek | "also"? who else is there? :) | 09:38 |
| tbf | superm1: always was missing that field when grabbing packages from packages.ubuntu.com/packages.debian.org :-D | 09:38 |
| superm1 | slangasek, people who write srpms? | 09:38 |
| superm1 | i'd guess | 09:38 |
| tbf | slangasek: gentoo too | 09:38 |
| slangasek | tbf: I don't think gentoo uses control files? :) | 10:09 |
| tbf | slangasek: well, but they have ebuilds, and that ebuilds list the upstream homepage for ages | 10:10 |
| tbf | superm1: package updated, comment added | 10:16 |
| === Lure_ is now known as Lure | ||
| === jekil2 is now known as jekil | ||
| geser | TheMuso, ScottK, Hobbsee: does the ghc6 transition FFe exception also cover new upstream version of packages which are already transitioned but where the new version is a build-dependency of a package which didn't transition yet? | 12:39 |
| cyberix | Is it ok to start version numbering from 0ubuntu2? As I have already published 0ubuntu1 in my PPA and I'd like to avoid conflicting with that? | 13:01 |
| Iulian | Can someone please check my debdiff, trying to fix genshi package (bug #199104) - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5436/plain/ | 13:31 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 199104 in qtparted "[Hardy] qtparted v0.4.5-cvs starts with kdesudo only" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199104 | 13:31 |
| Iulian | Oups, actually its bug 199014 | 13:32 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 | 13:32 |
| geser | Iulian: why did you remove the Uploaders line? | 13:34 |
| geser | Iulian: why the change to B-D-I? | 13:35 |
| geser | Iulian: and why the Python-Versions line? | 13:36 |
| Iulian | geser: By mistake, because lintian complains about B-D-I | 13:37 |
| geser | Iulian: about the -1? then remove it (>= 0.6b3) | 13:38 |
| Iulian | geser: Ok, see http://paste.ubuntu.com/5437/plain/ | 13:39 |
| Iulian | geser: And about Python-Versions, should I remove that too? | 13:39 |
| geser | Iulian: where have you read about Python-Versions? | 13:40 |
| Iulian | geser: Actually RainCT told me to add that line to python-genshi | 13:41 |
| geser | I know python-central uses X[SB]-Python-Version in debian/control but python-support uses debian/pyversion for this | 13:42 |
| Iulian | geser: pyversions file contains 2.3- | 13:43 |
| === Halph_ is now known as Halph | ||
| geser | Iulian: and while you are at fixing genshi, could you start with genshi 0.4.4-2 from Debian unstable? as it already contains some fixes (like Standards-Version) | 13:44 |
| Iulian | geser: Sure | 13:44 |
| geser | Iulian: change it then to 2.4- to accomplish what you want | 13:44 |
| Iulian | Ok, doing the changes right now. | 13:44 |
| Iulian | Thanks | 13:44 |
| === joejaxx_ is now known as joejaxx | ||
| Iulian | Should I mention in the changelog that I changed pyversions from 2.3- to 2.4- ? | 13:59 |
| azeem | I guess, yeah | 13:59 |
| Iulian | Ok | 14:01 |
| Iulian | I don't know why it complains about debian/rules, actually there is that line - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5438/plain/ | 14:08 |
| Iulian | And there is no python-central. | 14:09 |
| Iulian | Brb | 14:09 |
| azeem | you need to install cdbs | 14:10 |
| hellboy195 | LucidFox: around? | 14:25 |
| Na-Fiann | Hi, I noticed that the version of xmms2 in ubuntu reps is old and that the newer version is in debian reps. will it make it into ubuntu reps as well? | 14:26 |
| Na-Fiann | or can I do something to get it in there? | 14:26 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: it does need a FFE | 14:27 |
| Na-Fiann | what is a FFE? | 14:27 |
| bobbo | Feature Freeze Exception | 14:27 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: Feature freeze Exception but I'm not sure if it gets accepted | 14:27 |
| bobbo | Na-Fiann; https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze?highlight=(Feature)|(Freeze) | 14:28 |
| Na-Fiann | so.. I run gutsy, and for gutsy it needs an approval to be updated? is that what it means? | 14:31 |
| Na-Fiann | or does this apply to the upcoming release? | 14:31 |
| Iulian | azeem: cdbs is already installed but quilt wasn't | 14:33 |
| Iulian | I think it's ready now - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5439/plain/ | 14:37 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: what xmms version does gutsy has? | 14:37 |
| Na-Fiann | gutsy has 0.2DrJekyll the latest is 0.4DrKosmos | 14:39 |
| Iulian | geser: Do you mind to take a look at it again? | 14:39 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: 0.4 won't even make it into hardy (for now). So I suppose it won't be backporte | 14:40 |
| hellboy195 | d | 14:40 |
| Na-Fiann | oh thats too bad.. any reasons why not? | 14:41 |
| Na-Fiann | not that i need to approve of it or anything:p just curious | 14:41 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: dunno. no one worked on it so far. The problem is that we are now in FF (Feature Freeze) and I don't think xmms is important enough to get an exception. Besides that xmms2 is still alpha/beta | 14:44 |
| bobbo | Debdiff for Bug #199014 (in pyslide) up if anyone has any spare time | 14:44 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 | 14:45 |
| Na-Fiann | ahh thats a shame. thanks for the answers hellboy195 | 14:45 |
| hellboy195 | Na-Fiann: You're welcome. If it's urgent you can try to use the debs from debian though we don't recommend that ;) | 14:47 |
| === _czessi is now known as Czessi | ||
| geser | Iulian: no, where is the last version? | 14:53 |
| geser | Iulian: s/no/sure/ :) | 14:54 |
| Iulian | geser: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5439/plain/ | 14:58 |
| Iulian | geser: I just want to make sure it's correct before I submit it to the bug report. In this case I won't make noise :) | 14:59 |
| bddebian | Heya gang | 15:14 |
| hellboy195 | bddebian: yeah :) | 15:15 |
| bddebian | Hello hellboy195 | 15:15 |
| cyberix | persia: Is it ok to start version numbering from 0ubuntu2? As I have already published 0ubuntu1 in my PPA and I'd like to avoid conflicting with that? | 15:17 |
| geser | Iulian: looks very good | 15:56 |
| geser | Hi bddebian | 15:56 |
| bddebian | Heya geser | 15:57 |
| Iulian | geser: Sorry, I was watching TV. Ok, I will attach it to the bug report. | 16:18 |
| === azeem_ is now known as azeem | ||
| Iulian | I've got another debdiff for you guys to take a look at please - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5440/plain/ (for opendict package - bug #199014) | 17:14 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 | 17:14 |
| === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde | ||
| DktrKranz | geser, new dietlibc revision is available on my PPA for testing. If you want to try it on amd64, it would be great. | 18:25 |
| === dfiloni is now known as d | ||
| === d is now known as dfiloni-StoCucin | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| zigo-- | Hi. | 19:32 |
| zigo-- | "Next, ask the REVU admins in #ubuntu-motu to re-sync the REVU uploaders keyring, which grants you upload rights to REVU." | 19:32 |
| zigo-- | Can someone do that ??? | 19:32 |
| fdr | hello! I was wondering if it is possible to have flightgear 1.0 under ubuntu 7.10 ... | 19:49 |
| === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | ||
| emgent | heya | 21:10 |
| Amaranth | had to watch a toddler for a bit | 21:40 |
| Amaranth | err, wrong window | 21:40 |
| Amaranth | weird compiz focus bug there | 21:40 |
| slangasek | anybody can photoshop a pic like that, you're not getting any blackmail money out of me | 21:42 |
| slangasek | err, wrong window | 21:42 |
| slangasek | ;) | 21:42 |
| sistpoty | hi folks | 22:02 |
| === tiagoboldt_ is now known as tiagoboldt | ||
| siretart | slomo: well, the plan is to update it to a later upstream release | 22:08 |
| RainCT | zigo--: still need a keyring re-sync? | 22:10 |
| RainCT | slangasek: I don't want to know in what sort of channels you are ;) | 22:12 |
| geser | sistpoty: Hi | 22:19 |
| geser | sistpoty: does the ghc6 transition FFe exception also cover new upstream version of packages which are already transitioned but where the new version is a build-dependency of a package which didn't transition yet? | 22:19 |
| sistpoty | Hi geser | 22:20 |
| sistpoty | geser: I guess it would make sense that it covers it, though ACK from me on this ;) | 22:20 |
| === bmk789_ is now known as bmk789 | ||
| geser | thanks, I'll file the needed sync requests then. The transition is nearly completed now. | 22:23 |
| sistpoty | geser: thank you very much for working on this! :) | 22:24 |
| === kitterma is now known as ScottK2 | ||
| Iulian | siretart: ping | 23:00 |
| protonchris | sistpoty: Thanks for the bug comments | 23:29 |
| protonchris | sistpoty: Bug 190744 | 23:29 |
| sistpoty | protonchris: you're welcome... thanks for working on the bug | 23:29 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 190744 in libgdamm3.0 "Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744 | 23:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!