[01:15] hrm [01:15] what happens if I upload a source packages to PPA but forget the .orig.tar.gz? [01:15] mrh [01:15] I mean, will I have to bug people, or can I just rebuild the package with -sa and reupload [01:16] or do I have to bump version numbers [01:16] it was rejected, then? [01:16] or what? [01:16] dunno, it was only a few minutes ago [01:16] this was the first time I tried to upload something to PPA [01:17] ah [01:17] rejected [01:17] bah [01:17] Unable to find distroseries: unstable [01:17] ah, really? I have no recollection of using -sa when uploading a package to PPA; but maybe yours is an .orig.tar.gz that's not in the archive... oh, or it could be rejected for an unrelated reason ;) [01:18] slangasek: yeah, am trying to get the opensync-0.22 packages compiled for hardy [01:18] s/archive/library/ [01:18] but apparently I have to add bogus changelog entries with "hardy" in it for that [01:18] azeem: no, you just need a .changes that points at hardy [01:18] ah, that'd work as well then [01:18] thanks [01:19] Hi, I've been assigned a bug and don't know why. What should I do? [01:20] soundray: well, you might want to mention the bug # for starters :) [01:20] Subject: [PPA debian-opensync] Accepted: opensync 0.22-2 (source) [01:20] yay [01:20] slangasek: #457246 [01:20] soundray: um... is that a Debian bug number? [01:21] it's not a Launchpad bug number [01:21] slangasek: yes... but the email was sent to the address I use on launchpad. [01:21] I guess it's just a mistake. I know hardly anything about netatalk :) [01:22] soundray: what's your launchpad login and/or the address you use on it? [01:23] azeem: soundray; ubuntubug@soundray.de [01:23] weird [01:23] soundray: that's very strange, the only related open bug I see on netatalk source is bug #195011, which is not linked to the Debian version and not assigned to you [01:23] Launchpad bug 195011 in netatalk "netatalk fails assertion, afpd won't launch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195011 [01:23] oh, are you perhaps in the bugsquad group? [01:23] slangasek: no. [01:24] soundray: if it was a mail you got, maybe you can put it on a pastebin [01:24] I've only ever reported a few bugs in feisty (unrelated) [01:24] soundray: ah, heh, there's the problem - you have a login named "ubuntubug" :) [01:25] slangasek: do you think there's a realistic chance in getting opensync-0.22 into hardy? [01:25] azeem: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/58823/ [01:25] soundray: so yes, someone mistook you for the Ubuntu bug squad; "ubuntubug" seems like a poor choice of a launchpad ID :) [01:26] azeem: hmm, how do I answer that objectively... :) [01:26] slangasek: okay, that would explain it [01:27] I guess it's safe to ignore -- or should I pass it on to someone? [01:28] safe to ignore, it's already been reassigned to the correct party [01:28] slangasek, azeem: thanks for your help. === ^4nDr3s is now known as RoAkSoAx [02:40] heya [02:57] i need help porting Photoshop cs2 to gusty, i have the adobe folder in the program files directory under wine but i cant seem to get the right registry key imported, when cs2 loads up it says it is unactivated, but it is activated on the xp machine [02:59] Exfil: this is far from the correct channel to ask for such support, your best bet would be #winehq [03:16] Heya gang [03:22] heya :P [03:29] Hi emgent [03:30] Hello [03:36] Hi protonchris [04:40] evening all [04:41] Hello [04:41] Heya LaserJock [04:42] bddebian: dude, I'm doing some openGL programming [04:42] if this works I'll be pretty impressed [04:56] LaserJock: Rock On man! [04:59] bddebian: in C++ no less [04:59] I haven't gotten it all figured out yet though [05:00] I'm learning about nurbs === _emgent is now known as emgent [05:03] C++ makes my head hurt :) [06:51] ScottK: it's not even binary mangling.... [06:51] ScottK: it only showed as core dev because you uploaded a source that said that's waht the maintainer was... [07:06] is there a channel for help with apt pinning? [07:12] #ubuntu, etc [07:12] sparr_: man dpkg, to the section on "set-selections" usually [07:12] well, more with apt than with dpkg [07:12] thanks though [07:12] dpkg --set-selections lets you hold packages, it doesn't do pinning [07:13] ok, how about a contradiction between the man page for apt* and the workings of current versions? [07:14] forget it [07:14] i give up [07:15] i wonder why we don't have "this is not another #ubuntu, we don't do general support here" in the topic [09:06] G'morning. === tb1 is now known as tbf [09:18] superm1: what exactly is the reason why mythtv is in multiverse? [09:19] slomo, two things [09:19] lame [09:19] and the ffmpeg that is shipped within it [09:19] superm1: also you can give me debdiffs for new uploads, that's easier than mentors i guess ;) [09:19] Argh, more embedded ffmpeg? [09:19] superm1: hm... couldn't those be stripped (and build against system ffmpeg)? [09:19] slomo, well whichever you'd prefer [09:20] well lame yes - it's a very ugly patch to do so, but a mandriva guy wrote one [09:20] the ffmpeg unfortunately can't use the system wide one [09:20] superm1: i prefer debdiff ;) [09:20] they have some enhancements that upstream hasn't accepted [09:20] great [09:21] not to mention now its built against faac/faad too [09:21] and liba52 [09:21] :) [09:21] superm1: Can't you kick upstream into being sane? [09:22] Fujitsu, i've tried. [09:22] so let's see if my inet is reliable enough today for uploading next gnome-lirc-properties iteration [09:22] so some of these things could be loosened, but the functionality of the app goes down greatly [09:22] tbf, i'm looking it over right now [09:22] I guess that does rely on ffmpeg upstream not being stupid, though L( [09:22] *:( [09:22] Fujitsu: Don't the ffmpeg developers recommend embedding it? [09:22] superm1: ok, unless upstream is a bit saner it has to be in multiverse, yes ;) can't they go a modular way, having all problematic bits in another source package? ;) [09:22] superm1: how that? 0.2.4 upload failed [09:22] i just dget'ed it right now [09:23] it built [09:23] the one from march 5th [09:23] RAOF: Considering they don't have any kind of API stability, probably. [09:23] Fujitsu, RAOF yeah they regularly merge with upstream, but recommend staying away from the tree for ~2-3 weeks to sort out problems from API stability [09:24] siretart: what's the plan with experimental's ffmpeg (and ubuntu)? :) [09:24] slomo, well after hardy comes out, i'm going to redo all of the packaging [09:24] Because it's obviously impossible to have a fast multimedia library with a stable API >:( [09:24] during that time i'll see about loosening deps [09:24] and seeing how nicely it comes across [09:25] RAOF: not really... it just needs some work and thinking ;) [09:25] That obviously needed a tag :) [09:25] haha [09:26] but assuming that it keeps an embedded ffmpeg, this will still be a bit messy [09:26] superm1: found the upnp-mythtv patch for totem? [09:26] superm1: also, if you have a debian-compatible mythtv package please tell me ;) [09:26] slomo, i've been busy all week with some other stuff, it [09:27] 's on my list for tomorrow :) [09:33] hah! i am smarter than this broken vodafone router with its aborted connections and than revu's ftp server with its do-not-overwrite policiy [09:33] * tbf rsynched to his vhost and run dput from there :-D [09:34] superm1: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516672 [09:34] Gnome bug 516672 in Plugins "gmyth upnp" [Enhancement,Unconfirmed] [09:34] ah thanks [09:34] i'll give that a go [09:35] superm1: uh, you commented in the meantime :-D [09:37] superm1: cool, debian/ubuntu also start to add homepage fields to control files now? [09:37] tbf, yeah [09:38] "also"? who else is there? :) [09:38] superm1: always was missing that field when grabbing packages from packages.ubuntu.com/packages.debian.org :-D [09:38] slangasek, people who write srpms? [09:38] i'd guess [09:38] slangasek: gentoo too [10:09] tbf: I don't think gentoo uses control files? :) [10:10] slangasek: well, but they have ebuilds, and that ebuilds list the upstream homepage for ages [10:16] superm1: package updated, comment added === Lure_ is now known as Lure === jekil2 is now known as jekil [12:39] TheMuso, ScottK, Hobbsee: does the ghc6 transition FFe exception also cover new upstream version of packages which are already transitioned but where the new version is a build-dependency of a package which didn't transition yet? [13:01] Is it ok to start version numbering from 0ubuntu2? As I have already published 0ubuntu1 in my PPA and I'd like to avoid conflicting with that? [13:31] Can someone please check my debdiff, trying to fix genshi package (bug #199104) - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5436/plain/ [13:31] Launchpad bug 199104 in qtparted "[Hardy] qtparted v0.4.5-cvs starts with kdesudo only" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199104 [13:32] Oups, actually its bug 199014 [13:32] Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 [13:34] Iulian: why did you remove the Uploaders line? [13:35] Iulian: why the change to B-D-I? [13:36] Iulian: and why the Python-Versions line? [13:37] geser: By mistake, because lintian complains about B-D-I [13:38] Iulian: about the -1? then remove it (>= 0.6b3) [13:39] geser: Ok, see http://paste.ubuntu.com/5437/plain/ [13:39] geser: And about Python-Versions, should I remove that too? [13:40] Iulian: where have you read about Python-Versions? [13:41] geser: Actually RainCT told me to add that line to python-genshi [13:42] I know python-central uses X[SB]-Python-Version in debian/control but python-support uses debian/pyversion for this [13:43] geser: pyversions file contains 2.3- === Halph_ is now known as Halph [13:44] Iulian: and while you are at fixing genshi, could you start with genshi 0.4.4-2 from Debian unstable? as it already contains some fixes (like Standards-Version) [13:44] geser: Sure [13:44] Iulian: change it then to 2.4- to accomplish what you want [13:44] Ok, doing the changes right now. [13:44] Thanks === joejaxx_ is now known as joejaxx [13:59] Should I mention in the changelog that I changed pyversions from 2.3- to 2.4- ? [13:59] I guess, yeah [14:01] Ok [14:08] I don't know why it complains about debian/rules, actually there is that line - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5438/plain/ [14:09] And there is no python-central. [14:09] Brb [14:10] you need to install cdbs [14:25] LucidFox: around? [14:26] Hi, I noticed that the version of xmms2 in ubuntu reps is old and that the newer version is in debian reps. will it make it into ubuntu reps as well? [14:26] or can I do something to get it in there? [14:27] Na-Fiann: it does need a FFE [14:27] what is a FFE? [14:27] Feature Freeze Exception [14:27] Na-Fiann: Feature freeze Exception but I'm not sure if it gets accepted [14:28] Na-Fiann; https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze?highlight=(Feature)|(Freeze) [14:31] so.. I run gutsy, and for gutsy it needs an approval to be updated? is that what it means? [14:31] or does this apply to the upcoming release? [14:33] azeem: cdbs is already installed but quilt wasn't [14:37] I think it's ready now - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5439/plain/ [14:37] Na-Fiann: what xmms version does gutsy has? [14:39] gutsy has 0.2DrJekyll the latest is 0.4DrKosmos [14:39] geser: Do you mind to take a look at it again? [14:40] Na-Fiann: 0.4 won't even make it into hardy (for now). So I suppose it won't be backporte [14:40] d [14:41] oh thats too bad.. any reasons why not? [14:41] not that i need to approve of it or anything:p just curious [14:44] Na-Fiann: dunno. no one worked on it so far. The problem is that we are now in FF (Feature Freeze) and I don't think xmms is important enough to get an exception. Besides that xmms2 is still alpha/beta [14:44] Debdiff for Bug #199014 (in pyslide) up if anyone has any spare time [14:45] Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 [14:45] ahh thats a shame. thanks for the answers hellboy195 [14:47] Na-Fiann: You're welcome. If it's urgent you can try to use the debs from debian though we don't recommend that ;) === _czessi is now known as Czessi [14:53] Iulian: no, where is the last version? [14:54] Iulian: s/no/sure/ :) [14:58] geser: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5439/plain/ [14:59] geser: I just want to make sure it's correct before I submit it to the bug report. In this case I won't make noise :) [15:14] Heya gang [15:15] bddebian: yeah :) [15:15] Hello hellboy195 [15:17] persia: Is it ok to start version numbering from 0ubuntu2? As I have already published 0ubuntu1 in my PPA and I'd like to avoid conflicting with that? [15:56] Iulian: looks very good [15:56] Hi bddebian [15:57] Heya geser [16:18] geser: Sorry, I was watching TV. Ok, I will attach it to the bug report. === azeem_ is now known as azeem [17:14] I've got another debdiff for you guys to take a look at please - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5440/plain/ (for opendict package - bug #199014) [17:14] Launchpad bug 199014 in eric "python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199014 === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde [18:25] geser, new dietlibc revision is available on my PPA for testing. If you want to try it on amd64, it would be great. === dfiloni is now known as d === d is now known as dfiloni-StoCucin === asac_ is now known as asac [19:32] Hi. [19:32] "Next, ask the REVU admins in #ubuntu-motu to re-sync the REVU uploaders keyring, which grants you upload rights to REVU." [19:32] Can someone do that ??? [19:49] hello! I was wondering if it is possible to have flightgear 1.0 under ubuntu 7.10 ... === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger [21:10] heya [21:40] had to watch a toddler for a bit [21:40] err, wrong window [21:40] weird compiz focus bug there [21:42] anybody can photoshop a pic like that, you're not getting any blackmail money out of me [21:42] err, wrong window [21:42] ;) [22:02] hi folks === tiagoboldt_ is now known as tiagoboldt [22:08] slomo: well, the plan is to update it to a later upstream release [22:10] zigo--: still need a keyring re-sync? [22:12] slangasek: I don't want to know in what sort of channels you are ;) [22:19] sistpoty: Hi [22:19] sistpoty: does the ghc6 transition FFe exception also cover new upstream version of packages which are already transitioned but where the new version is a build-dependency of a package which didn't transition yet? [22:20] Hi geser [22:20] geser: I guess it would make sense that it covers it, though ACK from me on this ;) === bmk789_ is now known as bmk789 [22:23] thanks, I'll file the needed sync requests then. The transition is nearly completed now. [22:24] geser: thank you very much for working on this! :) === kitterma is now known as ScottK2 [23:00] siretart: ping [23:29] sistpoty: Thanks for the bug comments [23:29] sistpoty: Bug 190744 [23:29] protonchris: you're welcome... thanks for working on the bug [23:30] Launchpad bug 190744 in libgdamm3.0 "Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190744