| asac | off | 00:54 |
|---|---|---|
| [reed] | asac: ping? | 03:08 |
| asac | [reed]: yes? | 08:35 |
| asac | debian bug 470128 | 08:58 |
| ubotu | Debian bug 470128 in icedove "xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/470128 | 08:58 |
| asac | [reed]: are b4 rc2 builds looking good? | 10:16 |
| armin76 | asac: that bug is old | 10:36 |
| asac | yes | 10:36 |
| asac | i know | 10:36 |
| asac | its just that some guy told me that i should fix that bug id in debian | 10:37 |
| asac | just wanted to know what bug that is | 10:37 |
| armin76 | ah | 10:38 |
| * asac hates if people just refer to bug ids without including at least a title ;) | 10:52 | |
| asac | i really go crazy if i read the bug 178558 | 11:11 |
| asac | i mean ... i posted a test package and are there any comments about that recently? no, of course not | 11:11 |
| asac | those folks don't deserve to get a fix ;) | 11:11 |
| asac | answer: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bug/178558/comments/36 | 11:17 |
| asac | hope that is still "nice" enough | 11:17 |
| asac | (in line with the ubuntu etiquette) | 11:18 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 178558 in xulrunner-1.9 "Firefox 3.0 makes everything annoyingly huge" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178558 | 11:22 |
| armin76 | haha | 12:00 |
| asac | yeah :) ... thats how things work ;) | 12:02 |
| cwong1_ | asac: ping | 16:07 |
| asac | cwong1_: hi | 16:18 |
| cwong1_ | asac: Couple of things I want to discuss with you: | 16:19 |
| cwong1_ | asac: 1) Do you have any changes that you want to check in? | 16:19 |
| asac | yes. sorry that i was rather in active in the recent past | 16:19 |
| asac | got dragged in lots of other things | 16:19 |
| cwong1_ | np | 16:19 |
| cwong1_ | we all do :) | 16:20 |
| asac | cwong1_: i have a hald ported ffox 3 beta3 thing | 16:20 |
| asac | s/hald/half/ | 16:20 |
| asac | but maybe we should go directly for beta 4 which is about to be released today or so | 16:20 |
| asac | at least the CVS is tagged already | 16:20 |
| asac | whatelse? | 16:20 |
| cwong1_ | that sounds good to me. I was going to suggest the same. | 16:20 |
| cwong1_ | 2) I want to hold off the switch to Xulrunner | 16:21 |
| asac | great | 16:21 |
| asac | hold of? | 16:21 |
| asac | thought we wanted to use a mobile specific fork | 16:21 |
| cwong1_ | I have a lot of bugs to work on and I dont think I can get to it in the next week or 2 | 16:22 |
| cwong1_ | unless you have the time :) :) | 16:22 |
| asac | i can look | 16:22 |
| asac | maybe we can spin both binaries from the same source | 16:22 |
| asac | (as we already have all in there) | 16:22 |
| asac | but lets first do beta4 | 16:22 |
| asac | is jimmy avail? | 16:23 |
| cwong1_ | ok beta4 first | 16:23 |
| cwong1_ | he also looking into bugs. | 16:23 |
| cwong1_ | btw do you know of a plugin that is equivalent to window media plugin | 16:23 |
| cwong1_ | ? | 16:23 |
| asac | for that i would need to know what "window media plugin" is :) | 16:23 |
| asac | what does it do compared to totem? | 16:24 |
| cwong1_ | it plays window media files and totem doesn't | 16:24 |
| [reed] | asac: yep, releasing today | 16:24 |
| asac | [reed]: thanks | 16:25 |
| asac | cwong1_: totem doesn't? | 16:25 |
| [reed] | unless something disastrous happens | 16:25 |
| [reed] | but hopefully not ;) | 16:25 |
| asac | cwong1_: you have a test file? | 16:25 |
| [reed] | asac: can you comment in mozilla bug 418885 about what you think? | 16:25 |
| asac | [reed]: i think i will release the bits in a few hours then :) | 16:25 |
| asac | ubotu: wake up | 16:25 |
| cwong1_ | asac: I will send u a test site shortly... | 16:26 |
| asac | cwong1_: i thought it was .wmv files. to play those its just a matter of codec (unless you are talking about DRM) | 16:26 |
| cwong1_ | asac: is there a wmv codec for totem? | 16:26 |
| asac | Bug 418885 – Firefox 3 shouldn't require GTK+ 2.10 (edit) | 16:27 |
| asac | [reed]: that sounds lame ;) | 16:27 |
| [reed] | I want to WONTFIX it | 16:27 |
| [reed] | ;) | 16:27 |
| asac | [reed]: reading the title i would say "yes" | 16:27 |
| asac | but let me read the content in a few more minutes | 16:27 |
| asac | cwong1_: i am not sure if it plays all ... at least i have been watching wmv files happily for quite some time | 16:28 |
| [reed] | we're not changing our minimum (of 2.10), but there is a possibility we'll add some checks to at least allow 2.8 to work somewhat | 16:28 |
| [reed] | even if they can't print | 16:28 |
| asac | cwong1_: other players that might play more files are vlc + mplayer | 16:28 |
| asac | cwong1_: those should ship all the codecs they support out of the box | 16:28 |
| asac | cwong1_: i think to get all available codecs you need to install: | 16:29 |
| asac | gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-multiverse | 16:29 |
| asac | gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly-multiverse | 16:29 |
| asac | gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly | 16:29 |
| asac | gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad | 16:29 |
| cwong1_ | asac: I knew about mplyaer, but never heard of vlc. I will give them a try and see. | 16:29 |
| asac | gstreamer0.10-plugins-good | 16:30 |
| cwong1_ | I did install gstreamer0.10* and still couldn't play some of the files | 16:30 |
| cwong1_ | I will find the site and let you know in a few minutes.. | 16:30 |
| asac | cwong1_: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg | 16:31 |
| asac | then i don't know | 16:31 |
| asac | only thing i can imagine is that those files are DRM enabled ... for which you are unlikely to find a free implementation i guess | 16:31 |
| asac | cwong1_: thanks ... i will be travelling in a few, but will catch up on work later - so probably a better time for you :) | 16:31 |
| cwong1_ | ok | 16:32 |
| cwong1_ | later | 16:32 |
| asac | [reed]: hmm ... if the patch work ten i don't know why not to take it :) ... it would allow us to provide backports of firefox 3 for dapper for instance | 16:34 |
| asac | which is still supported for quite some time | 16:34 |
| [reed] | asac: well, see caillon's comments | 16:34 |
| [reed] | where he plans on backporting Fx3 back to RHEL 2.1 | 16:34 |
| asac | yes ... just read that | 16:37 |
| asac | i doubt that he will succeed on a gtk 1 port ;) | 16:37 |
| asac | [reed]: http://steelgryphon.com/blog/?p=101 | 16:39 |
| asac | i always understood the phrase "Older distros will be able to have build-time support/workarounds as necessary, but Mozilla will not ship or test builds for older platforms. " | 16:39 |
| asac | that those tweaks should go the mozilla CVS ... though disabled during compile time | 16:40 |
| asac | note that there is a conflict here: distros are not allowed to ship arbitrary patches without getting review on them first | 16:40 |
| asac | huge patches because of old gtk+ should thus be reviewed in bugzilla | 16:41 |
| asac | we could keep them unapplied then, but that makes it harder to reuse those. | 16:41 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 418885 in OS Integration "Firefox 3 shouldn't require GTK+ 2.10" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418885 | 16:41 |
| ubotu | Sorry, I don't know anything about wake up - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi | 16:41 |
| asac | for instance caillon will create patches for supporting the old gtk | 16:41 |
| asac | maybe he submits them to mconnor who either trusts him or tries to get a review | 16:41 |
| asac | from someone else | 16:42 |
| asac | i guess it would end up: post a bug and get a review+ | 16:42 |
| asac | but then its hard for other distros to find all the required pieces and all that | 16:42 |
| asac | ... so in the end a hard question | 16:42 |
| asac | but for now i agree, that 2.8 doesn't need to be supported | 16:42 |
| asac | at least not at runtime | 16:42 |
| asac | i am fine with wontfixing this | 16:43 |
| === Ubulette_ is now known as Ubulette | ||
| Ubulette | hi | 17:59 |
| Ubulette | wontfix for me too | 17:59 |
| Ubulette | asac, i didn't add libsqlite3-dev on purpose | 18:04 |
| Ubulette | it's not used and will not be in hardy anyway | 18:05 |
| asac | right ... but it doesn't hurt. otherwise its not even really optional | 18:57 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| Ubulette | asac, could we stop naming nspr with the gecko version ? | 19:28 |
| asac | Ubulette: why? | 19:29 |
| Ubulette | now, nspr claims #define PR_VERSION "4.7.1 Beta" | 19:29 |
| Ubulette | or a last put the full version in front | 19:30 |
| Ubulette | like 4.7.1~b~1.9~b4 | 19:30 |
| asac | Ubulette: how does the version read atm? | 19:31 |
| Ubulette | 4.7.0~1.9b3-0ubuntu2 | 19:31 |
| Ubulette | ie, it doesn't respect the full nspr version | 19:31 |
| Ubulette | same for nss | 19:32 |
| asac | Ubulette: i have no problem to squeeze in a ~beta~ | 19:34 |
| asac | i think the main point was that there was no real version at some point | 19:34 |
| asac | so mike just choose somethign reasonable | 19:34 |
| asac | Ubulette: is there a tag that reads liks 4.7.1 beta now? | 19:35 |
| asac | i think the problem was that they didn't tag the version with an nspr'ish version... but just with the firefox release tag | 19:35 |
| Ubulette | doesn't matter much, we can still fetch it using a gecko tag but name it like we want | 19:37 |
| Ubulette | NSPR_4_7_1_BETA1 | 19:39 |
| Ubulette | http://paste.ubuntu.com/5549/ | 19:39 |
| asac | Ubulette: yes ... but it wasn't really clear how to name it at that point | 19:41 |
| asac | i think the error was to use 4.7.1~1.9 ... instead of 4.7.1~~1.9 | 19:41 |
| asac | so yes ... go for 4.7.1~beta~1.9+... if you have a better feeling about that | 19:41 |
| Ubulette | k | 19:42 |
| Ubulette | NSS_HEAD_BEFORE_RFC4507BIS | 19:44 |
| Ubulette | ** The format of the version string is | 19:58 |
| Ubulette | ** "<major version>.<minor version>[.<patch level>] [<Beta>]" | 19:58 |
| Ubulette | it's even documented | 19:58 |
| Ubulette | asac, it still doesn't solve how I can name my snapshots to keep them intertwined with the official releases we do here | 20:11 |
| Ubulette | nspr_4.7.1~beta~~cvs20080310t1054.orig.tar.gz is no good | 20:12 |
| asac | indeed | 20:15 |
| asac | why not 4.7.1~beta~1.9b4~cvs... ? | 20:16 |
| Ubulette | how could mozclient identify 1.9b4 just from nspr sources ? | 20:17 |
| RainCT | asac: hey | 20:22 |
| asac | RainCT: hi | 20:24 |
| asac | RainCT: i have a question :) | 20:24 |
| asac | why did you remove the upstrema sources from your branch? | 20:24 |
| asac | (the extension?) | 20:24 |
| RainCT | asac: because I find it easier to work with it that way | 20:25 |
| asac | how easier? | 20:25 |
| asac | what steps are easier? | 20:25 |
| RainCT | or is there some problem with that? | 20:25 |
| asac | well ... i would love to have a single approach for all extensions ... if you really want to keep it that way, then i am fine | 20:26 |
| asac | point is that extensions are so tiny that I'd prefer not to have patch system in them | 20:26 |
| RainCT | dunno.. I don't remember the actual reason, but I also find it cleaner and that | 20:26 |
| asac | ok. | 20:26 |
| asac | RainCT: so what do you want? | 20:27 |
| RainCT | shouldn't be a problem to add it again though.. | 20:27 |
| RainCT | well.. help on getting it working :P | 20:28 |
| asac | maybe consider that. its easier for new contributors to just have the upstream sources in there ... and so on. | 20:28 |
| asac | anyway ...what doesn't work? | 20:28 |
| RainCT | asac: I tried installing it but I don't see it in Firefox 3 | 20:28 |
| asac | hmm ... did you try to use the xpi.mk i introduced recently in mozilla-devscripts? | 20:29 |
| RainCT | (don't know if it works with Firefox 2 as I don't have it installed anymore) | 20:29 |
| asac | that should automize all | 20:29 |
| RainCT | no, looking at that :) | 20:29 |
| asac | you just need to specify an extension name + a build command | 20:29 |
| asac | (that expects a .xpi to be produced) | 20:29 |
| asac | RainCT: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions/Packaging | 20:29 |
| asac | thats the document i used at my extension packaging session | 20:30 |
| asac | it should work for all trees that can produce a proper .xpi | 20:30 |
| RainCT | oh, forgot to read that at the end.. :P | 20:30 |
| RainCT | s/that/the packaging season log | 20:30 |
| RainCT | is xpi.mk already in Hardy? | 20:31 |
| asac | yes | 20:31 |
| asac | you can look at some other extension | 20:31 |
| asac | e.g. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jetsaredim/firefox-extensions/mozgest.ubuntu/annotate/jgreenwa%404lom-20080227214222-fruivuu7tfxwbcka?file_id=rules-20080227041249-6uckd8mo559wu2sf-6 | 20:31 |
| Ubulette | asac, you can remove the mention of your ppa, it's no longer needed | 20:31 |
| asac | where? | 20:31 |
| Ubulette | <asac> RainCT: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions/Packaging | 20:31 |
| asac | ah | 20:31 |
| asac | Ubulette: its in hardy, right? | 20:31 |
| Ubulette | !info mozilla-devscripts | 20:32 |
| ubotu | Package mozilla-devscripts does not exist in gutsy | 20:32 |
| Ubulette | !info mozilla-devscripts hardy | 20:32 |
| ubotu | mozilla-devscripts (source: mozilla-devscripts): Collection of dev scripts used by Ubuntu Mozilla packages. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.05 (hardy), package size 14 kB, installed size 108 kB | 20:32 |
| Ubulette | yes | 20:32 |
| asac | Ubulette: ok done | 20:32 |
| Ubulette | thx | 20:32 |
| asac | btw ... if all goes well mozilla-devscripts will go into main | 20:33 |
| asac | to produce the translation .xpis | 20:33 |
| Ubulette | you can remove the whole line, it's already listed above | 20:34 |
| asac | oh :) | 20:34 |
| asac | ok done :) (2nd) | 20:34 |
| RainCT | asac: Vcs-Bzr is accepted now (no XS- necessary) | 20:38 |
| * RainCT says this because of XPI.TEMPLATE | 20:39 | |
| asac | oh :) | 20:39 |
| asac | thanks | 20:39 |
| RainCT | np :) | 20:39 |
| RainCT | also, mozilla-devscripts in hardy is version 0.05 but the template says 0.5~ | 20:40 |
| asac | thanks | 20:40 |
| asac | done | 20:40 |
| asac | RainCT: right .. but thats a lower bound and should be ok | 20:41 |
| asac | i have another great candidate: all-in-one-sidebar | 20:41 |
| asac | its tri-licensed | 20:41 |
| asac | :) | 20:42 |
| asac | and appears to be 3.0 compatible already | 20:42 |
| RainCT | asac: will xpi.mk autodetect the .xpi if it's created on build time and inside debian/? | 20:42 |
| asac | yes | 20:43 |
| asac | oh | 20:43 |
| asac | no | 20:43 |
| asac | RainCT: why is it in debian/ ? | 20:43 |
| RainCT | oh, there's a BUILD_COMMAND option | 20:43 |
| asac | yes | 20:43 |
| asac | BUILD_COMMAND ... and you can also explicitly name the .xpi to pack-up | 20:43 |
| RainCT | I've this right now: perl ./create_xpi.pl debian/adblockplus.xpi | 20:43 |
| asac | yeah ... just use adblockplus.xpi | 20:44 |
| asac | clean will auto delete it form there | 20:44 |
| RainCT | should I change it to this? MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = perl ./create_xpi.pl adblockplus.xpi | 20:44 |
| asac | yes | 20:44 |
| asac | makes sense imo | 20:44 |
| asac | if you have issues let me know :) ... this xpi.mk certainly doesn't cover all cases yet :) | 20:44 |
| asac | use :) | 20:45 |
| asac | aeh := | 20:45 |
| asac | MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND :perl ./create_xpi.pl ... | 20:45 |
| asac | MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND := perl ./create_xpi.pl ... | 20:45 |
| RainCT | will it automatically add the dependencies for unzipping and all that? | 20:45 |
| asac | yes | 20:47 |
| asac | everything thats needed by itself will be added | 20:47 |
| asac | if you need anything else because of perl you need to add that | 20:47 |
| asac | oh wait :) | 20:48 |
| asac | no right :) ... oyu confused me ;) | 20:48 |
| asac | all shold be fine ... just add mozilla-devscripts to build-depedns | 20:48 |
| RainCT | ok, cool :) | 20:49 |
| RainCT | create_xpi.pl needs zip; I've to add this one manually, or? | 20:49 |
| asac | RainCT: yes | 20:50 |
| asac | xpi.mk just needs unzip | 20:50 |
| RainCT | asac: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/59182/ | 20:53 |
| asac | RainCT: you need to drop your .install files | 20:55 |
| asac | and your .links | 20:55 |
| asac | that happens automatically now | 20:55 |
| asac | or don't you have any? | 20:56 |
| RainCT | oops, right | 20:56 |
| RainCT | :$ | 20:56 |
| asac | good | 20:56 |
| RainCT | asac: adblock-plus should also be compatible with those: iceweasel (>= 1.5) | seamonkey-browser (>= 1.0) | iceape-browser (>= 1.0) | midbrowser (>= 0.2) | 21:05 |
| RainCT | what should I do with them? just remove that from debian/control? | 21:06 |
| asac | no you can add more applications to xpi.mk | 21:06 |
| asac | RainCT: look in xpi.mk file for MOZ_XPI_MOZILLA_DIRS | 21:07 |
| asac | default is firefox-addons i guess ... you can add whatever you want | 21:07 |
| asac | so add iceape seamonkey midbrowser iceweasel | 21:07 |
| asac | and firefox + firefox-addons | 21:07 |
| Ubulette | i use it with prism too but it's tricky | 21:09 |
| Ubulette | as prism doesn't show the red sign | 21:09 |
| asac | RainCT: is midbrowser in upstream install.rdf? | 21:10 |
| asac | that would be cool ;) | 21:10 |
| RainCT | asac: yes | 21:10 |
| asac | Ubulette: how about renaming the mozclient branch? | 21:20 |
| asac | you think its mature enough to get a real name ;) | 21:20 |
| asac | hehe | 21:20 |
| Ubulette | yes | 21:20 |
| asac | will u do? | 21:21 |
| * Ubulette thinking of a name not too long | 21:21 | |
| Ubulette | i'm up since 6am so my mind is blank | 21:22 |
| asac | Ubulette: hehe :) ... how about mozilla-devscripts for now? | 21:23 |
| Ubulette | locally, i will call it mozilla-devscripts.dev | 21:23 |
| Ubulette | or without .dev is good too | 21:23 |
| asac | can we cann it that way on launchpad? | 21:23 |
| asac | i think .dev is good for the development branch | 21:24 |
| asac | s/cann/call/ | 21:24 |
| Ubulette | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts | 21:24 |
| Ubulette | we just have one branch so it's okay like that | 21:25 |
| asac | i am fine with that ... but atm we don't even have nont .<something> branches for other things | 21:25 |
| asac | thats ok | 21:25 |
| asac | maybe we should once again rename the branches for all the packages :-D | 21:26 |
| asac | remove .dev ... rename .head -> .dev | 21:26 |
| asac | :) | 21:26 |
| asac | and releast branches get .gutsy and so on | 21:26 |
| Ubulette | maybe another day later this week | 21:26 |
| asac | but rather push that forward till hardy+1 :) | 21:27 |
| Ubulette | or during UDS ;) | 21:27 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 21:27 |
| asac | branch clean up session :) | 21:27 |
| Ubulette | I have to update my buildbot now. | 21:34 |
| asac | update to what? | 21:34 |
| asac | woody? | 21:34 |
| Ubulette | ? no | 21:34 |
| Ubulette | it uses mozclient | 21:34 |
| asac | just kidding | 21:35 |
| asac | ah ... cool | 21:35 |
| Ubulette | you were supposed to comment on my ff3 sdk bug last week | 21:36 |
| asac | thanks for the reminder. completely dropped off of my radar | 21:39 |
| Ubulette | we should start a "package 5 extensions a day" | 21:52 |
| asac | yeah :) | 21:53 |
| asac | the problem is the list of viable extensions though | 21:53 |
| asac | so "investigate 5 extensions a day" would be extremely helpful though | 21:54 |
| asac | if we#d had a long list of extensions that are ready (license + compatible) we could initiate an "extension packaging marathon" :) | 21:55 |
| Ubulette | blog about it on planet | 22:04 |
| asac | ur right | 22:07 |
| RainCT | asac: great, adblock-plus works now (after switching to xpi.mk) :D | 22:15 |
| RainCT | asac: what did you say, does it need a FFe? | 22:16 |
| asac | RainCT: no it doesn't just open a bug and refer in it to the general feature freeze exception for ffox extensions | 22:24 |
| asac | subscribe mozillateam next | 22:25 |
| asac | and once Ubulette or me confirmed you can upload :-D | 22:25 |
| asac | (we agreed to ack those to make universe-release team happy) | 22:25 |
| RainCT | asac: ok. upload to revu or link the branch? | 22:25 |
| asac | RainCT: you have upload rights? | 22:26 |
| RainCT | yes | 22:26 |
| asac | just link the branc | 22:26 |
| asac | h | 22:26 |
| RainCT | allright | 22:26 |
| asac | cool | 22:26 |
| asac | Ubulette: you get mozillateam subscribed bug mail? | 22:27 |
| RainCT | ubotu, bug #191954 | 22:27 |
| asac | (e.g. thats != mozilla-bugs) | 22:27 |
| RainCT | ubotu: you're slow :/ | 22:27 |
| asac | has been dead for me today | 22:27 |
| RainCT | oh | 22:27 |
| Ubulette | bug 191954 | 22:28 |
| asac | ubotu: you there? | 22:28 |
| asac | most likely a dead-lock :) | 22:28 |
| RainCT | seems like he is ill... yesterday we had an 1 hour lag in #ubuntu-youth lol | 22:28 |
| RainCT | (1 hour, really :)) | 22:28 |
| RainCT | asac: ok, subscribed | 22:32 |
| RainCT | asac: btw, what do you want to do with mozilla-firefox-adblock? remove it and add a dummy package to adblock-plus or convert mozilla-firefox-adblock itself into a dummy package, or just remove it? | 22:33 |
| Ubulette | a dummy is needed for the transition | 22:36 |
| asac | yes | 22:38 |
| RainCT | yes, but were? in adblock-plus, or? | 22:39 |
| asac | yes | 22:39 |
| asac | you add dummy packages depending on mozilla-firefox-adblock in there | 22:40 |
| asac | so you get an upgrade | 22:40 |
| asac | and you add conflicts/replaces to adblock main package | 22:40 |
| asac | (verseioned conflicts/replaces) | 22:40 |
| RainCT | okay. a last question, should I add the dummy package now or once mozilla-firefox-adblock has been removed? | 22:41 |
| asac | right from the beginning | 22:41 |
| asac | removal happens after migration | 22:41 |
| asac | oh ... take care that the version is higher than the on of mere -adblock | 22:42 |
| asac | maybe you need to add an epoch for that | 22:42 |
| RainCT | why? | 22:42 |
| asac | otherwise -adblock users will not be auto transitioned | 22:42 |
| RainCT | ahhh right | 22:42 |
| asac | (as the dummy package version would be lower ... so it couldn't pull in the new package as a dependency) | 22:42 |
| RainCT | that's evil :) | 22:43 |
| RainCT | ah no, it's ok :) | 22:43 |
| RainCT | 0.7.5.3-0ubuntu1 (new) VS 0.5.3.043-4ubuntu1 (old) | 22:43 |
| Ubulette | asac, "You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mozilla Team, which is a direct subscriber." so i guess it's ok | 22:44 |
| asac | yes great | 22:47 |
| asac | RainCT: yes ... you have luck | 22:47 |
| Ubulette | and you should stop the sync/merge from debian | 22:50 |
| Ubulette | if any | 22:51 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 191954 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Adblock Plus" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191954 | 22:52 |
| ubotu | Sorry, I don't know anything about you're slow :/ - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi | 22:52 |
| ubotu | Sorry, I don't know anything about you there? - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi | 22:52 |
| Ubulette | :) | 22:52 |
| Ubulette | maybe i should drop my nick and use fta instead | 23:04 |
| Ubulette | RainCT: so you will upload it to debian too ? | 23:08 |
| RainCT | Ubulette: is mozilla-devscripts in Debian? | 23:13 |
| Ubulette | no | 23:13 |
| RainCT | then not | 23:13 |
| Ubulette | and our paths for mozilla products are different too | 23:13 |
| Ubulette | then you should target hardy in debian/control | 23:14 |
| RainCT | true.. :) | 23:14 |
| Ubulette | and drop iceape-browser | 23:15 |
| RainCT | and iceweasel too? | 23:15 |
| Ubulette | and iceweasel too | 23:15 |
| Ubulette | yep | 23:15 |
| RainCT | ok | 23:15 |
| * RainCT had added those as there are some people which use Ubuntu but install the mozilla packages from Debian.. but now that he thinks about it, those aren't probably many :P | 23:17 | |
| Ubulette | :) | 23:17 |
| Ubulette | you can rename the branch too then | 23:17 |
| Ubulette | otherwise, it looks ok to me | 23:17 |
| Ubulette | I like rules files so simple :) | 23:18 |
| * RainCT too :D | 23:18 | |
| Ubulette | that was the whole purpose of mozilla-devscripts | 23:19 |
| RainCT | Ubulette: if you leave an ack on the report I'll upload it tomorrow :) | 23:30 |
| asac | well .. keeping iceweasel + iceape is sane | 23:31 |
| asac | we should contribute it to debian at somepoint | 23:31 |
| asac | but i don't care hard | 23:31 |
| Ubulette | it's still targeting unstable, i was waiting for at least this commit before giving an ack | 23:32 |
| asac | yes | 23:32 |
| RainCT | Ubulette: yes, my connection is slow :/ | 23:33 |
| RainCT | it's up now | 23:33 |
| asac | RainCT: you can use dch -r to prepare changelog for release | 23:33 |
| asac | and please use 0ubuntu1 ... in case you didn't yet | 23:33 |
| RainCT | I did :) | 23:33 |
| asac | still unstable? | 23:33 |
| asac | strange | 23:33 |
| asac | unless you are on debian of course :) | 23:34 |
| RainCT | rev 12? | 23:34 |
| Ubulette | good here | 23:34 |
| RainCT | should be: adblock-plus (0.7.5.3-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low | 23:34 |
| asac | yes | 23:34 |
| Ubulette | there's a storm here | 23:35 |
| asac | we had enough storms for this year already | 23:37 |
| RainCT | good night :) | 23:45 |
| Ubulette | 'night | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!