| owh | Hiya, just lodged Bug #201237 for tasksel, but it applies to hardy alpha 6. How do I tell LP that? | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 201237 in tasksel "tasksel does not work if installed on a machine with no network" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201237 | 00:17 |
| owh | One suggestion made was to lodge a new bug at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+bugs, but that seems to imply that I need to close this bug and do it again. That doesn't make sense to me. | 00:19 |
| bdmurray | owh: A bug is assumed to apply to the latest version of the package which would be Hardy. | 00:19 |
| owh | bdmurray: Except that it doesn't show up in the hardy bug list, so it is unlikely to be dealt with prior to release. | 00:19 |
| owh | Or am I mistaken? | 00:20 |
| bdmurray | You could nominate it for the Hardy list then. You can do this on the left hand side of the bug remote in the pink Actions menu. | 00:21 |
| owh | bdmurray: Hmm, well, LP shows it as nominated, but it still doesn't show in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+bugs - am I missing something? | 00:23 |
| bdmurray | owh: nominations need to be approved by an Ubuntu driver member | 00:23 |
| bdmurray | otherwise the Hardy list would be much longer. ;) | 00:24 |
| owh | bdmurray: Fair point. Well, in that case, I've done my part I think - thanks for the help. | 00:24 |
| bdmurray | owh: thank you for submitting the bug | 00:25 |
| owh | bdmurray: That's the easy part :) - I try to hold my end up with fixing and patching too :) | 00:26 |
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| Pici | Hm. Where would a bug regarding the gnome multimedia keys go? It doesnt appear to be specific to one application. | 02:10 |
| james_w | Pici: what's the problem? | 02:10 |
| Pici | james_w: The gnome multimedia keybindings don't appear to be working in Hardy (at least track forward and back). Exaile, Sonata (i think it supports it) and decible-audio-player are not working... | 02:12 |
| Pici | Although now someone says that quod-libet does (/me looks) | 02:12 |
| james_w | Pici: can you try rhythmbox? | 02:13 |
| Pici | james_w: sure, moment | 02:13 |
| james_w | Pici: also, are these special keys on your keyboard? | 02:13 |
| Pici | james_w: They are, and they appear to be working in Rhythmbox | 02:14 |
| james_w | I guess that they are bugs in the other apps then. If rhythmbox picks them up then they are working ok. | 02:14 |
| Pici | james_w: roger that | 02:14 |
| james_w | however if they are relying on something else to relay the messages then that may be at fault. | 02:15 |
| Pici | I'm going to do some looking around | 02:16 |
| RAOF | Pici: The problem is that there's a new mmkeys API. | 02:16 |
| Pici | RAOF: Aha. | 02:16 |
| RAOF | Pici: Rhythmbox will (should) work, everything else needs updating. | 02:16 |
| Pici | RAOF: Is it necessary to log a bug for each of them? or how does something like this work? | 02:17 |
| RAOF | Pici: What you'd want to do is to file a bug against one of them, and then go "also affects" all the others. | 02:18 |
| RAOF | It's essentially one-bug-per-package, but with the same bug number. | 02:18 |
| Pici | RAOF: Do you happen to know what version of python-mmkeys the api was changed in? | 02:20 |
| RAOF | Um, it's probably not python-mmkeys; it's gnome-settings-daemon which publishes the multi-media key info. | 02:20 |
| Pici | hmm | 02:21 |
| Pici | Okay | 02:21 |
| RAOF | So gnome-settings-daemon changed how it publishes the MMKeys information (again), and the non-Rhythmbox apps aren't looking in the right place. | 02:22 |
| jjesse | bdmurray: you around? | 02:57 |
| jjesse | need some help triaging bug #35605, as the bug references Mandrivia | 03:01 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 35605 in kdeartwork "kpartsaver segfaults" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35605 | 03:01 |
| jjesse | the bug is marked as fix released in kdeartwork, do i assume its been fixed in mandrivia? | 03:02 |
| jjesse | and mark it the same? | 03:02 |
| bdmurray | jjesse: looking | 03:14 |
| bdmurray | I'd mark it Invalid as Mandriva doesn't use Launchpad, there isn't a remote Mandriva bug for the bug watch that we know of and because the Mandiva affects was probably added wrongly. | 03:16 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, a general question. when a bug filed on a project which falls under a loco team in launch pad, who can unsubscribe the team from the bug? | 03:25 |
| techno_freak | i meant, the project was included the team's project list (which was again not known how) | 03:26 |
| bdmurray | Team admins can unsubscribe the team from a bug report. Do you have a link for the issue you are talking about? | 03:27 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, yes, one minute. | 03:27 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, bug #183958 someone marked it as security issue thinking that it would stop mails from that bug. | 03:28 |
| ubotwo | techno_freak: Bug 183958 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/183958 is private | 03:28 |
| techno_freak | and as private too | 03:29 |
| bdmurray | I can't see that bug report, but as the Ubuntu Bugs team owner I have the ability to unsubscribe the team from bug reports like 35605 that was mentioned earlier. Ubuntu Bugs shows up as a "direct" subscriber and when I click on Subscribe/Unsubscribe I see "Unsubscribe Ubuntu Bugs from this bug" | 03:31 |
| bdmurray | Does that help some? | 03:32 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, i was able to see it, but when i was seeking help from people here some one made it a security issue after which it is not viewable at all | 03:32 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, yes. i understood what you said. :) | 03:33 |
| bdmurray | jdstrand: can you see it? | 03:33 |
| bdmurray | techno_freak: what package was the bug about? | 03:36 |
| techno_freak | bdmurray, BBox if i remember it right | 03:36 |
| yuriy | hmm how do i add an upstream bug watch? looks like the interface has changed since i last did this | 03:40 |
| yuriy | i did also affects project but there isn't a place to put in a bug | 03:40 |
| bdmurray | +Project if it is far upstream | 03:41 |
| bdmurray | yuriy: for what package? | 03:41 |
| yuriy | bdmurray: bug 201281 | 03:41 |
| * bdmurray waits for it | 03:41 | |
| yuriy | heh, katapult, upstream bug here: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140591 | 03:42 |
| techno_freak | bug #201281 | 03:42 |
| bdmurray | I was hoping ubotu or ubotwo would say something | 03:42 |
| tritium | The bots are having issues today, bdmurray | 03:42 |
| * yuriy notes taht ubotwo has quit^^ | 03:42 | |
| techno_freak | ubotu sometimes becomes too slow to respond, think it is overloaded too much | 03:43 |
| yuriy | in this case it's not here at all though | 03:44 |
| bdmurray | yuriy: your bug is really weird | 03:44 |
| bdmurray | So katapult doesn't use Launchpad for bugs? | 03:45 |
| yuriy | well it's a package in ubuntu, and it's a component of kde and has bugs on bugs.kde.org | 03:46 |
| bdmurray | Well, somebody setup a Katapult project in Launchpad and that is why this is behaving differently. | 03:47 |
| bdmurray | https://launchpad.net/katapult/ | 03:47 |
| bdmurray | The Status shows them using Launchpad for bugs | 03:47 |
| * yuriy pings said someone to find out | 03:48 | |
| bdmurray | The "driver" of the project are the katapult-dev team and there you can find the team owner. | 03:48 |
| yuriy | mhmm, i did | 03:49 |
| bdmurray | Well, so that's why you can't add a link to the kde bug report. | 03:52 |
| kkubasik | hey, can someone take a look at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/193108 | 06:17 |
| kkubasik | its been marked a low priority | 06:17 |
| kkubasik | but it makes firefox almost unusable for several users | 06:17 |
| kkubasik | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/193108 | 06:17 |
| kkubasik | sorry =/ | 06:17 |
| savvas | does anyone know the package I should mention about this bug: http://pastebin.ca/raw/939393 | 07:23 |
| savvas | I get such errors while transferring to/from a mobile phone using usb | 07:24 |
| savvas | (whose free space is about 100mb) | 07:25 |
| ogra | savvas, | 07:45 |
| ogra | [69854.011266] sde: sde1 | 07:45 |
| ogra | [69854.027239] sde: p1 exceeds device capacity | 07:45 |
| ogra | your partition table is broken on the device | 07:45 |
| savvas | you mean the phone card is the problem? | 07:46 |
| savvas | hm give me a sec, i'll back my files and format it | 07:47 |
| ogra | write a proper partition table to it :) | 07:48 |
| ogra | cfdisk is your friend | 07:48 |
| savvas | FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 0: Partition ends after end-of-disk | 07:49 |
| savvas | heh | 07:49 |
| techno_freak | ah | 07:49 |
| savvas | ogra: it's a memory stick pro duo on sony ericsson w810i, think it matters? | 07:50 |
| ogra | no idea, i just saw the errormessage in your paste :) | 07:52 |
| savvas | i'll try format it with their software in the phone, i'll try it in about 20 minutes | 07:53 |
| savvas | remind me to hug you unofficially :P | 07:54 |
| savvas | ogra: do you happen what type should i use? I just formatted using the phone software and it's happening again :\ | 08:15 |
| savvas | hm it says FAT16 | 08:17 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| savvas | ogra: every time I disconnect & reconnect the usb to my mobile phone, it says unallocated disk space in gparted | 08:32 |
| savvas | the weird thing is that the mobile phone internal memory seems ok | 08:32 |
| === ogra_cmpc_ is now known as ogra_cmpc | ||
| jdstrand | bdmurray: I don't have access to that bug either (which is a little odd actually) | 11:03 |
| techno_freak | jdstrand, it was marked as a security issue by some one thinking it would stop the bug mails being sent to all people in the team. even the team admin is not able to view it | 11:09 |
| pedro_ | good morning! | 11:11 |
| jdstrand | techno_freak, bdmurray: sounds like an LP issue if noone can se it | 11:15 |
| techno_freak | jdstrand, any idea whom i should bug to get it solved? :) | 11:23 |
| pochu | jwendell: hi, I'm forwarding the change at bug 191716 to the debian maintainer, but he's asking me whether there's a backtrace of one somewhere... do you have one handy, or a way to trigger a crash due to that change? | 11:31 |
| jwendell | where's bugbot :'( | 11:38 |
| jwendell | pochu, link, plz | 11:38 |
| pochu | jwendell: http://launchpad.net/bugs/191716 | 11:55 |
| pochu | jwendell: ubotu is lagging these days :) | 11:55 |
| jwendell | pochu, ah, anjuta... I've just replied there | 11:56 |
| pochu | jwendell: oh, I see. thank you :) | 12:00 |
| jdstrand | techno_freak: how about joing #launchpad and asking there? | 12:01 |
| jdstrand | (sorry for the delay, had to get my son ready for school) | 12:01 |
| Pici | Ubotu is not well these days... been trying to get in contact with Seveas to whip it back into shape, but no-go. I'll see if I can get one of the backup bots in here. | 12:03 |
| techno_freak | jdstrand, sure, thanks | 12:03 |
| jdstrand | np | 12:03 |
| === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon | ||
| Iulian | Hi | 12:36 |
| primes2h | Is there someone in here having a laptop with ati chipset? | 13:07 |
| primes2h | bad news. | 13:09 |
| primes2h | 'ati' (radeon) driver is going to be blacklisted from compiz. | 13:09 |
| primes2h | So all people happily using compiz with this driver (open source) on a laptop won't be able to have compiz by default. | 13:10 |
| Pici | primes2h: link? | 13:10 |
| primes2h | bug #197135 | 13:11 |
| primes2h | I opened a bug to whitelist my card (because I never had problem with compiz) | 13:12 |
| primes2h | Have a look #201330 | 13:12 |
| Pici | I see that Travis Watkins (Amaranth) is looking at it, I trust he'll do the right thing. | 13:13 |
| primes2h | Probably there are other people that don't have problems with 'ati' driver and compiz, but it should be better to let it know. | 13:14 |
| primes2h | This choice (to blacklist completely 'ati' driver) would affect a lot of people... | 13:15 |
| primes2h | The real problem is that ati proprietary drivers don't support all chipset. | 13:17 |
| primes2h | so who (like me) has these chipset won't be able to use compiz by default. | 13:19 |
| primes2h | Even if it has been working very well until now. | 13:20 |
| === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon | ||
| === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === ogra_cmpc__ is now known as ogra_cmpc | ||
| MagicFab | hey | 15:03 |
| MagicFab | is there a way to make a bug " depend" on another in LP ? | 15:03 |
| === mvo__ is now known as mvo | ||
| pedro_ | something like bug 95419 ? | 15:07 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 95419 in malone "Record dependencies between bugs" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/95419 | 15:07 |
| qense | hello! | 16:24 |
| pedro_ | hey hey | 16:25 |
| qense | got to go, bye | 16:33 |
| afflux | morning | 17:25 |
| bdmurray | Hello! | 17:25 |
| afflux | I came across another bug reported via apport but invisible for ubuntu-bugcontrol :( | 17:25 |
| afflux | I asked for the report in bug 183685, the new bug is bug 201071 | 17:26 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 183685 in compiz-fusion-plugins-main "compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183685 | 17:26 |
| ubotwo | afflux: Bug 201071 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/201071 is private | 17:26 |
| bdmurray | afflux: you could ask Nikolai to subscribe to the bug to figure out what is going on | 17:29 |
| afflux | bdmurray: yes, but exactly the same happend some days ago with bug 199911, which was requested from me in bug 190428 | 17:31 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 199911 in emerald "emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_gc_new_with_values() (dup-of: 139877)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199911 | 17:31 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 139877 in emerald "emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_gc_new_with_values()" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139877 | 17:31 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 190428 in emerald "emerald crashed on "alt-tab" windows switching" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190428 | 17:31 |
| qense | hello again | 17:33 |
| afflux | hi qense | 17:33 |
| bdmurray | afflux: it looks like the reporter added Crash bug triagers for universe as a subscriber manually. Does that sound right to you? | 17:35 |
| afflux | bdmurray: I asked him to do that, because we had no access | 17:35 |
| afflux | bdmurray: I opened a crash bug myself lately, and it was only apport who was subscribed automatically. I think ubuntu-crashes-universe should be added automatically (I think that's how we used to did that) | 17:36 |
| bdmurray | afflux: How did you open the crash bug? via nautilus or was it reported automatically? | 17:40 |
| afflux | automatically, IIRC | 17:41 |
| afflux | or maybe apport-cli | 17:41 |
| secretlondon | this is supposed to be the pob with apport and gutsy? | 17:46 |
| bdmurray | afflux: I'm looking at the code now | 17:47 |
| secretlondon | pitti apparently stopped apport retracing gutsy bugs according to hhdgh | 17:47 |
| afflux | mine wasn't even gutsy :( | 17:47 |
| afflux | (in case that's correct, I think there should be some sort of announcement on the MLs) | 17:48 |
| secretlondon | yes, the story was that it was due to the age of some launchpad -python thing | 17:49 |
| secretlondon | in which case we should update the python.. | 17:49 |
| afflux | right | 17:49 |
| secretlondon | but this is second hand.. | 17:50 |
| afflux | ah, looking at my bug, it hasn't been retraced, either, but the need-i386-retrace tag has been removed | 17:52 |
| pedro_ | number? | 17:53 |
| pedro_ | hey afflux | 17:53 |
| afflux | hi pedro_ | 17:53 |
| afflux | number is bug 199846 | 17:53 |
| ubotwo | afflux: Bug 199846 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/199846 is private | 17:53 |
| afflux | should I open it? | 17:54 |
| pedro_ | ouch forbidden | 17:54 |
| bdmurray | afflux: could you subscribe me to it? | 17:54 |
| afflux | bdmurray: huh, found two accounts for "brian murray". I suppose it's brian-murray? | 17:55 |
| bdmurray | yes, that's me | 17:55 |
| afflux | done | 17:55 |
| afflux | hi rockstar_ | 18:00 |
| rockstar_ | hi afflux | 18:01 |
| afflux | you can watch new bugs arriving in #ubuntu-bugs-announce , that's a good start for triaging | 18:01 |
| rockstar_ | afflux, thanks. I was kinda combing through, looking for dupes right now. The dual monitor set up is helpful for that. | 18:02 |
| afflux | oh right. I changed one monitor to LCD, that doesn't really work well with a second CRT as dual setup ;) | 18:02 |
| bdmurray | afflux: I'm under the impression there was an issue with the retracer for a while. | 18:09 |
| afflux | ah, right | 18:10 |
| afflux | I'm reading -devel, btw ;) | 18:10 |
| lesshaste | hi | 18:43 |
| bdmurray | hello | 18:44 |
| bdmurray | pedro_: I'm looking at the Ubuntu Desktop test cases and was wondering if you could take a look at some of it. | 18:45 |
| pedro_ | bdmurray: ok i'll take a look to them later | 18:45 |
| bdmurray | pedro_: okay, there are some "!!!" caveats I'm concerned about. there's also a whole bit about installing brasero, we can remove that now right? | 18:46 |
| pedro_ | yes that's now shipped by default so that part (the install) can be removed | 18:48 |
| bdmurray | right, okay I'll rip that out | 18:48 |
| askand | Slow flash performance when compiz is activated, is that a known bug in hardy? | 18:48 |
| bdmurray | well or remove the testing bit | 18:49 |
| bdmurray | er install | 18:49 |
| calc | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/184887/comments/8 <- bug reporters with a sense of humor ;-) | 19:16 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 184887 in openoffice.org "OpenOffice crashes when importing csv file into calc" [Undecided,Fix released] | 19:16 |
| qense | ... | 19:16 |
| qense | wow! another crash of OOo, do you think it has the same cause! :P | 19:17 |
| calc | look at the powerpoint file attached to the comment ;-) | 19:17 |
| calc | neither one crashes on hardy so i marked it fixed, but the file is funny ;-) | 19:17 |
| pedro_ | hahaha | 19:17 |
| pedro_ | i feel sorry for his cat :-P | 19:18 |
| qense | it did crash at my hardy | 19:18 |
| qense | amd64 | 19:18 |
| calc | oh hmm /me runs over to his amd64 box | 19:19 |
| qense | I've got a .crash file | 19:20 |
| calc | ah need to upgrade my box first before testing, has ~ 400 packages to download | 19:20 |
| calc | qense: please reopen with the crash file | 19:21 |
| qense | oops | 19:21 |
| qense | another bug? | 19:21 |
| qense | and mark the one you marked as fixed as duplicate of mine? | 19:21 |
| calc | qense: oh i can reopen it and then you just attach to the same bug | 19:21 |
| calc | ok its new again | 19:22 |
| calc | in about 30m i can test up on my machine as well | 19:22 |
| qense | apport is already uploading the error logs | 19:24 |
| qense | it's bug 201524 | 19:28 |
| ubotwo | qense: Bug 201524 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/201524 is private | 19:28 |
| calc | qense: ok thats fine | 19:28 |
| qense | you're in bugcontrol? | 19:28 |
| calc | hmm i don't have permission to view it yet | 19:29 |
| calc | bdmurray: can you assign that to openoffice? | 19:29 |
| calc | qense: apparently i just have rights to change bugs, etc not view private ones | 19:29 |
| qense | bugcontrol members should be able to view private apport bugs and look for private parts and remove that | 19:30 |
| qense | I can make the bug visible | 19:31 |
| qense | but it still needs retracing | 19:31 |
| calc | ok | 19:31 |
| qense | is the retracing for amd64 working? | 19:31 |
| * calc doesn't know | 19:31 | |
| calc | hopefully :) | 19:31 |
| calc | amd64 and i386 are the two main platforms | 19:32 |
| alex-weej | can someone do a quick test for me please? just remove the GNOME notification area from your panel and re-add it | 19:32 |
| alex-weej | it comes back without any icons on my system | 19:32 |
| qense | anyway, I need to go | 19:33 |
| qense | bye | 19:33 |
| calc | brb, lunch | 19:34 |
| seb128 | alex-weej: confirmed | 19:34 |
| alex-weej | seb128: do you know if there's an open bug for it? someone has one open on launchpad but it's not Incomplete, Low | 19:35 |
| alex-weej | *it IS Incomplete, Low | 19:35 |
| alex-weej | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/195915 | 19:35 |
| ubotwo | Launchpad bug 195915 in gnome-panel "removing notification area from the panel" [Low,Incomplete] | 19:35 |
| seb128 | alex-weej: not that I know | 19:35 |
| seb128 | alex-weej: in fact it's really broken, if you open an application using the notification area it doesn't add the icon there | 19:36 |
| alex-weej | yeah i noticed that too | 19:36 |
| alex-weej | seb128: killall gnome-panel | 19:39 |
| bdmurray | calc: I don't have permission to view that bug either | 19:39 |
| alex-weej | it comes back to life, (albeit without n-m... groan) | 19:39 |
| afflux | Is there a special reason why the upstream project for hardy's source package "emerald" has been set to "beryl"? | 21:01 |
| afflux | I'll change it back to "emerald" if noone raises any objections | 21:04 |
| bdmurray | afflux: is the upstream watch in bug 147529 right? | 21:06 |
| afflux | bdmurray: it's emerald, not beryl. I clicked "next" and didn't check because I forwarded an emerald bug some days ago where the project was correct | 21:07 |
| afflux | bdmurray: I invalidated the beryl task and added emerald | 21:07 |
| bdmurray | afflux: okay, my concern is there isn't a relationship between the "emerald" project and its bug tracker | 21:10 |
| bdmurray | so if someone tries to add also affects project emerald they won't see information about which bug tracker to use | 21:11 |
| afflux | do you mean the LP project or the upstream? | 21:11 |
| afflux | ah, LP | 21:11 |
| bdmurray | the lp project | 21:11 |
| bdmurray | if you look at https://launchpad.net/linux/ you can see which bug tracker the kernel uses | 21:13 |
| afflux | right | 21:13 |
| afflux | I think mvo can change this | 21:13 |
| bdmurray | I actually have the power to do it | 21:13 |
| afflux | ah | 21:14 |
| bdmurray | opencomposting.org is the right url for them? | 21:14 |
| afflux | yes. They don't really have an own website, it seems to be distributed along with compizfusion | 21:15 |
| bdmurray | afflux: okay, I updated the project. It should be easier to add upstream bug watches now. At least thats the theory | 21:18 |
| afflux | why "theory"? | 21:19 |
| bdmurray | s/theory/my understanding/ ? | 21:19 |
| afflux | right | 21:19 |
| afflux | okay, you still have to paste an url, but the "also affects project" page now lists the used bug tracker | 21:20 |
| bdmurray | yeah, it'd be neat if you could just put a # there if the tracker is known | 21:20 |
| afflux | indeed | 21:21 |
| afflux | okay, I'm going to bed. good night! | 21:21 |
| bdmurray | good night! | 21:21 |
| Gnine | can't login - blank screen | 8.04 2.6.24-11-generic x86_64 | after update on 3.10.2008 | 22:45 |
| phoenix24 | When does the HUG Day Start ? | 23:14 |
| bdmurray | phoenix24: probably now in Europe somewhere | 23:15 |
| rockstar_ | HUG day? | 23:15 |
| bdmurray | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay | 23:16 |
| rockstar_ | BUG day makes more sense... | 23:16 |
| === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Hug Day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313 | Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ - http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad | ||
| cudjoe | hi everyone! | 23:17 |
| bdmurray | It's been traditionally called Hug Day | 23:17 |
| cudjoe | I've just submitted a debdiff, changed the status to Fix Released. | 23:17 |
| cudjoe | but did get really well the Sponsoring Queue | 23:18 |
| cudjoe | someone could tell me please ? | 23:18 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: Fix Released should be used if the fixed package is available in the archive | 23:18 |
| cudjoe | bdmurray: oops. I was following "the 5 a day" tutorial :) that's my first one ! | 23:19 |
| bdmurray | it's easy to change back | 23:19 |
| cudjoe | I change it back. | 23:19 |
| cudjoe | how could I submit it ? | 23:20 |
| cudjoe | like I mean push it in the queue | 23:20 |
| bdmurray | what package is the bug about? | 23:21 |
| cudjoe | exaile. here it is :https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exaile/+bug/95860 | 23:21 |
| greg-g | hmmm, getting error when trying to add some bug numbers to my 5-a-day file: "'190092' has already been added today" even though I don't see it in my file online | 23:21 |
| bdmurray | greg-g: is it in someone elses? | 23:22 |
| greg-g | bdmurray: oh, it is in my local copy of my file | 23:24 |
| bdmurray | heh | 23:24 |
| cudjoe | state changed to "Fixed commited" in Exaile (ubuntu) | 23:24 |
| cudjoe | In the tutorial it says > "Add it to the sponsoring queue or upload it yourself" | 23:25 |
| greg-g | bdmurray: in that case all I would need to do is do a bzr commit in my 5-a-day-data dir later right (since there is still a lock on the branch) | 23:26 |
| greg-g | that is a question | 23:26 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess | 23:26 |
| bdmurray | I believe you are supposed to subscribe a team to the bug | 23:26 |
| bdmurray | Then it will get on their radar | 23:26 |
| cudjoe | Ok. I did not get that when reading the page. | 23:27 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: which tutorial were you reading? | 23:27 |
| cudjoe | this one : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day | 23:28 |
| cudjoe | Should I do "subscribe someone else" and select "ubuntu-main-sponsors" | 23:29 |
| bdmurray | greg-g: I'm not sure how the 5-a-day bzr branch is setup. normally with bzr branches I do a pull, commit, push. In this case I'd just add another bug. | 23:29 |
| bdmurray | exaile is a universe package though so it would be uubuntu-universe-sponsors | 23:29 |
| greg-g | bdmurray: yeah, just thought of that too :) good excuse to keeping triaging | 23:30 |
| cudjoe | bdmurray: ok done. thanks for helping. I was almost there :) Next ones are going to be easier. | 23:32 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: lokoing at your patch the debian/changelog file has an issue | 23:33 |
| cudjoe | really ? ...oh. | 23:34 |
| bdmurray | to get the bug automatically closed the format should be (LP: #95860) | 23:35 |
| phoenix24 | Anyone Triaging Totem Bugs (help here) ? | 23:35 |
| cudjoe | bdmurray: I saw the "Closes" format in the previous entries of the changelog...Should I rebuild it ? | 23:36 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: the closes format may have been specific to a different bug tracking system | 23:37 |
| bdmurray | and yes rebuilding it would be best, I imagine a sponsor would say something | 23:38 |
| blueyed | Should the KDE bug day also mention #ubuntu-bugs? (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313/KDE) | 23:41 |
| cudjoe | bdmurray: done. Regarding the page, I had read it, but it's pretty confusing (for non native speaker maybe) | 23:42 |
| bdmurray | cudjoe: The sponsorship page? I agree and have contacted someone about it. | 23:42 |
| blueyed | ..or even the main page (-"/KDE")? | 23:42 |
| cudjoe | It should mention that SponsorshipProcess consists in subscribing the team to the bug :) | 23:43 |
| cudjoe | thanks everyone. I hope not to have to bother anymore. | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!