[00:02] <bdmurray> bug 201170
[00:04] <keescook> bdmurray: did ubotu vanish?
[00:05] <secretlondon> its not here, certainly
[00:05] <bdmurray> I quieted him because there was a second one for a while, he seems to have quit now.
[00:05] <secretlondon> neither are here
[00:06] <secretlondon> ubotu has been very lagged recently - can be 10 mins or so
[00:06] <secretlondon> but has just spoken to me ;)
[00:12] <keescook> heh
[00:13] <secretlondon> "<ubotu> Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)"
[00:13] <secretlondon> so presumably it is here somewhere
[00:14] <secretlondon> bug #201170
[00:15] <savvas> usb problems, http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201643 - does anyone know which package i should add?
[00:16] <secretlondon> prob kernel without looking at the bug. we have a debugging removal devices page
[00:17] <yuriy> blueyed: yes, it probably should mention the channel, though the ubuntu page doesn't mention it either
[00:17] <yuriy> oh, now i get what your second comment meant
[00:18] <bdmurray> savvas: The kernel is correct.  I think those errors usually indicate bad cables or a device.
[00:23] <savvas> bdmurray: i didn't get them in previous kernels, the device is kingston datatraveller and just 2 months old, i take care of it pretty well, but i suppose it could break..
[00:24] <bdmurray> I might be wrong about the cable.
[00:25] <savvas> there's no cable :\
[00:25] <savvas> it's a flash disk
[00:26] <savvas> bah i'll have to go
[00:26] <savvas> bdmurray: do you think i need to send any other logs?
[00:26] <savvas> i've sent the ones that i thought important
[00:27] <bdmurray> That's normally what the kernel team looks for so it should be good to go.
[00:27] <savvas> ok thanks
[00:27] <bdmurray> I've updated the package for you too.
[00:28] <savvas> have a joyful night and don't let the ubuntu bugs bite :)
[03:09] <techno_freak> :)
[05:19] <ionstorm> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/201685
[05:39]  * techno_freak looks for the dupe-hunter
[08:50] <Lhademmor> I'm confirming one of the rhythmbox-bugs marked incomplete on the list. My first semi-bug contribution :D
[08:53] <techno_freak> welcome ;)
[08:55] <Lhademmor> thank you.
[08:55] <Lhademmor> Until I learn some more programming, I probably wont be of much help, thougj
[10:21] <secretlondon> bug #201673 looks like 'fun', glad I was asleep and missed it
[10:27] <hggdh> secretlondon: indeed it was fun...
[10:28] <secretlondon> it looks like it ;)
[10:30] <techno_freak> secretlondon, missed you to hunt dupes :p
[10:30] <hggdh> :-) part of being in the cutting, razor-sharp edge
[10:30] <secretlondon> techno_freak :)
[10:40] <Nightrose> what do I do with a bug that needs to be fixed by upstream and is in their bugtracker already?
[10:41] <Nightrose> link the bugs and set it to...?
[10:41] <Nightrose> hmm rather a wish than a bug
[10:41] <secretlondon> link our bug to theirs
[10:41] <secretlondon> also affects project
[10:41] <Nightrose> ok thx
[10:42] <Nightrose> that's all?
[10:42] <hggdh> also set the LP bug to "Triaged"
[10:42] <hggdh> Nightrose: ^^
[10:42] <hggdh> huh
[10:42] <secretlondon> yeah - launchpad will get the status from the bug automatically
[10:43] <hggdh> you may also add a note to the upstream bug with the LP bug URL
[10:43] <hggdh> good for cross-referencing
[10:43] <Nightrose> hggdh: I don´t think I can do that - I am in the Amarok team and can work on amarok bugs - but can´t seem to set them as triaged
[10:43] <hggdh> Nightrose: give me the bug #, and I will do it
[10:43] <Nightrose> ok sec
[10:44] <hggdh> (after setting the "also affects project")
[10:44] <Nightrose> hggdh: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/136520
[10:47] <hggdh> Nightrose: it is always good to add a comment on why you set the upstream bug -- this allows for the reporter, and others, to easily see why it was done. I am setting as triaged, and adding a small comment on that
[10:47] <hggdh> done
[10:47] <Nightrose> comment already added ;-)
[10:47] <Nightrose> thx
[10:47] <hggdh> oh, you already had...
[10:47] <hggdh> I am sorry
[10:48] <Nightrose> hehe no prob
[10:48] <hggdh> Nightrose: thanks for helping, BTW :-)
[10:49] <Nightrose> no prob - a lot of the Amarok devs are Kubuntu users - so we are interested in triaging these bugs
[10:49] <secretlondon> cool :)
[10:49] <Nightrose> and since today is hug day...
[10:49] <Nightrose> ;-)
[10:49] <hggdh> good... I personally use Amarok, but under Gnome
[10:49] <Nightrose> hehe we are fine with that
[10:49]  * hggdh hugs Nightrose
[10:49]  * Nightrose rehugs hggdh
[10:50]  * secretlondon hugs amarok
[10:50] <Nightrose> :p
[10:50]  * secretlondon also uses some kde apps under gnome
[10:52] <Nightrose> nixternal: damn you for taking all my nice bugs in the wiki ;-)
[10:56] <hggdh> Nightrose: (I forgot to tell you that) setting bugs to Triaged requires one to be a member of the bug-control team. You can apply for it after some time (usually a month) of bug triaging. You are welcome to, if you so want
[10:56] <hggdh> to
[10:56] <hggdh> :-)
[10:56] <Nightrose> ok thanks - will do
[11:44] <Nightrose> nixternal: sorry - I was talking crap - forget what I said :P
[11:49]  * secretlondon laughs at Nightrose
[11:49] <Nightrose> ;-)
[11:49] <secretlondon> He's a big boy, I'm sure he can take it!
[11:49] <Nightrose> haha yea
[11:50] <Nightrose> nixternal: btw I applied for eV membership on monday - now is your turn *g*
[11:54] <pedro_> folks!, today is the rhythmbox & totem hug day https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313
[11:54] <pedro_> and if you're using KDE and amarok you may want to look to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313/KDE
[11:55] <Nightrose> pedro_: I am already on the amarok bugs ;-)
[11:55] <pedro_> lets keep this hug days rocking!
[11:55] <pedro_> Nightrose: rock on!
[12:54] <Iulian> Hey
[12:56] <pedro_> hello Iulian, how are you today?
[12:56] <pedro_> ready to squash some bugs? ;-)
[12:59] <Iulian> I'm doing fine, thanks.
[12:59] <Iulian> I am ready!
[13:00] <pedro_> rock!
[13:00] <Iulian> By the way - Happy Hug Day everyone!
[13:04] <secretlondon> :)
[13:04] <Iulian> Hi secretlondon :)
[13:04] <secretlondon> Hi Iulian :)
[13:05] <ryanakca> hurra, bugday ;)
[13:05] <pedro_> woohoo
[13:06] <pedro_> is you're running GNOME https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313
[13:06] <pedro_> or KDE https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313/KDE
[13:37] <Nightrose> can someone close https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/165036 please?
[13:37] <Nightrose> I think the poster got p*issed at me enough by now ;-)
[13:38] <Gnine> package fetching failed with "403 forbidden" on a few packages
[13:39] <pedro_> Gnine: libc ones?
[13:39] <pedro_> it should be fixed shortly
[13:40] <Gnine> yes.. and a couple others.. cool. roger that
[13:41] <sourcercito> Nightrose, did you report the issue upstream or just talk with the upstream developers by im or irc?
[13:41] <Nightrose> sourcercito: I am upstream
[13:41] <Gnine> on x86_64 the issue was a little more drastic
[13:41] <sourcercito> i'm asking in case there's any reference to that upstream
[13:41] <sourcercito> ok, closing it then ;)
[13:41] <Nightrose> thank you ;-)
[13:41] <sourcercito> anytime
[13:43] <hggdh> Nightrose: ugh... bad experience...
[13:44] <thekorn> happy hug day!
[13:44] <Nightrose> hggdh: well I have to deal with a lot of this so I don´t really care - sometimes people just don´t understand ;-)
[13:46] <sourcercito> thekorn, happy hug day back to you ;)
[13:49]  * pedro_ hugs the whole bugsquad 
[13:49] <pedro_> how nice is the ubuntu pulse http://pulseofubuntu.tweetpeek.com/
[13:50] <pedro_> there's plenty of people in just a few days
[13:56]  * sourcercito peeking
[13:59] <Gnine> c0ol
[14:27] <Nightrose> hmm what to do with bugs like https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/182359 ?
[14:29] <pedro_> Nightrose: it's ok to close it as invalid
[14:30] <Nightrose> thx
[14:30] <pedro_> you're welcome
[15:07] <apachelogger_> ahoy
[15:09] <QbixAway> raise the sails!
[15:12] <afflux> morning
[15:14] <secretlondon> morning afflux
[15:14] <afflux> hi secretlondon
[15:18] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: replyto:"bugs.launchpad.net"
[15:18] <yuriy> morning
[15:18] <Nightrose> thx ;-)
[15:18]  * yuriy hugs Nightrose and apachelogger_ 
[15:18]  * apachelogger_ hugs yuriy and Nightrose
[15:18] <Nightrose> hey yuriy :)
[15:18] <afflux> hi yuriy
[15:19] <yuriy> hi afflux
[15:19] <afflux> uuh, I've fallen back in 5-a-day.
[15:19] <secretlondon> :(
[15:20] <afflux> I'll catch up today, I promise :P
[15:20] <secretlondon> :P
[15:20] <nixternal> Nightrose: I thought you had to be selected or something for the eV, I didn't know you could just apply
[15:21] <Nightrose> nixternal: you just have to ask someone to recommend you - I asked danimo
[15:21]  * yuriy would hug parthan/techno_freak too but doesn't see him
[15:21] <Nightrose> or rather danimo asked me
[15:21] <nixternal> ahh, nobody will recommend me :(
[15:21] <secretlondon> nixternal :(
[15:21] <Nightrose> nixternal: I am sure Riddell would - as would I once I am in ;-)
[15:22] <apachelogger_> nixternal: just ask one of the amarokers, they do everything for money
[15:22] <Nightrose> hehe
[15:22] <apachelogger_> really _everything_
[15:22] <nixternal> hahahaha, I bet
[15:22] <secretlondon> apachelogger_ photos?
[15:23] <santiago-ve> guys https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/120791 <-- i think it should be marked as invalid
[15:24] <santiago-ve> i made a comment there tho
[15:24] <apachelogger_> secretlondon: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/viewPhoto?uname=apachelogger&aid=5129629037405096673&iid=5129629166254115570
[15:24] <afflux> nooo, firefox can't just crash when I'm going for bugs :(
[15:25] <secretlondon> apachelogger_, that doesn't show amarok devs doing anything for money ;)
[15:25] <apachelogger_> hm, apparently firefox has a bug which is preventing the triage of bugs
[15:25] <secretlondon> well my firefox is okay
[15:25] <afflux> probably
[15:25] <apachelogger_> secretlondon: I am getting makeup there :P
[15:25] <secretlondon> ah okay
[15:27] <Nightrose> santiago-ve: marked as invalid - thx
[15:28] <santiago-ve> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/181293 this one can be marked as confirmed, i've experienced the same on kubuntu feisty 7.04
[15:28] <yuriy> santiago-ve: why don't you do it?
[15:29] <santiago-ve> yuriy, done then :p
[15:30] <yuriy> santiago-ve: don't forget to mark it off on the wiki : )
[15:30] <santiago-ve> since im new on this i dont want to do things bad xD!
[15:31] <apachelogger_> doing things wronger than me is pretty much impossible
[15:31] <yuriy> santiago-ve: on that one it would help to have some more circumstances under which the crash happens
[15:32] <yuriy> santiago-ve: also changing the title to something descriptive like "amarok crashes when doing xxx with error yyy" would be helpful
[15:33] <hggdh> santiago-ve: it might be also nice to have a backtrace with symbol resolution (i.e., without ?? in the function names)... I am not sure we can open upstream with the current BT
[15:33] <santiago-ve> gimmi a sec... i dont remember my wikilogin xD! (different machine)
[15:34] <Nightrose> well you got two people from upstream here - you can just ask ;-)
[15:35] <hggdh> Nightrose: is the stacktrace good for upstream?
[15:35] <hggdh> :-)
[15:35] <Nightrose> would be better to have more ;-)
[15:35]  * hggdh bows for Nightrose
[15:36] <Nightrose> hehe
[15:36] <santiago-ve> done, got in... so now how i mark "#181293" on the wiki?... i marked it as confirmed on LP~
[15:36] <Nightrose> santiago-ve: see the first paragraph in the wikipage
[15:42] <santiago-ve> kay
[15:43] <afflux> do we have people from rhythmbox upstream here too?
[15:44] <afflux> forwarded bug 199319 to gnome-bugs 522247
[15:44] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: bug 147616
[15:45] <pedro_> afflux: no we don't have rhythmbox/totem (they're the same) upstream this time
[15:45] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/147616
[15:45] <apachelogger_> stupid bots
[15:45] <pedro_> haha
[15:45] <yuriy> we're spoiled :P
[15:45] <afflux> pedro_: right, it's not urgent ;)
[15:46] <pedro_> bots aren't working pretty nice ATM :-(
[15:46] <pedro_> yeah i know :-)
[15:47] <bdmurray> pedro_: I could unquiet ubotu
[15:47] <pedro_> no no!
[15:47] <afflux> what did he do?
[15:47] <bdmurray> It won't announce that just happens u-b-a
[15:47] <Pici> ty
[15:47] <Seveas> Pici, where else is it muted?
[15:47] <yuriy> i thought it just wasn't supposed to be making announcements, but still respond to people mentioning bugs
[15:47] <bdmurray> Seveas: just here because of the lag
[15:48] <pedro_> ubuntulog is our new bot?
[15:48] <pedro_> ubuntulog: wake up!
[15:48] <Seveas> ubuntulog is only for logging...
[15:48] <bdmurray> pedro_: that's the logger that goes to irclogs.ubuntu.com
[15:48] <pedro_> damn it!
[15:48] <bdmurray> bug 178058
[15:48] <LjL> Seveas: not anywhere else that i remember. i'll check it from a script
[15:48] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 178058 in ubuntu "[Hardy] Desktop Screen extends too far" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178058
[15:49] <pedro_> tick tack tick tack
[15:49] <yuriy> somebody on kde3 try bug 121071? should be easy to test
[15:49] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 121071 in amarok "With Kicker Media Control Applet, Amarok tooltip misbehaves" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121071
[15:49] <pedro_> ubotu: i love you
[15:49] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about i love you - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[15:49] <pedro_> you don't?
[15:49] <pedro_> :-(
[15:49] <Seveas> pedro_, if launchpad is slow, ubotu is slow
[15:49] <Seveas> it fetches info from launchpad
[15:49] <bdmurray> pedro_: you could teach ubotu about love
[15:49] <pedro_> hahaha
[15:49] <Seveas> bdmurray, no robo-X-rated scenes here please ;)
[15:49] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/178189
[15:49] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 178189 in amarok "amarokapp crashed with SIGSEGV trying to play a WMA file" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[15:50] <bdmurray> Seveas: ubotu was having connectivity issues I thought, leaving due to flooding?
[15:50] <Seveas> bdmurray, all fixed when I came back from holiday
[15:50] <bdmurray> Ah, well great!
[15:50] <pedro_> it's working nicely on u-b-announce
[15:51] <Seveas> though you might see some odd-ish behaviour and an extra bot soon
[15:51] <Seveas> I'm rewriting the bugger
[15:51] <santiago-ve> i think 144132, 155586 and 144132 are duplicates of 181293, or may be different crashes... tho i still think they're duplicates
[15:51] <Seveas> bug 144132, 155586 and 144132
[15:52] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 144132 in amarok "1.4.7 [___stripped][validity: 0.53][frames:  97][xine]" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144132
[15:52] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 155586 in amarok "1.4.7 [___stripped][validity: 0.70][frames: 151][xine]" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155586
[15:52] <bdmurray> Seveas: Are the factoids kept in the source code?
[15:52] <Seveas> bdmurray, no
[15:52] <Seveas> bdmurray, http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/
[15:52] <Seveas> they're currently kept in an sqlite database, but will move to mysql
[15:53] <bdmurray> Hmm, I was trying to think an easier way to update them rather than going through them one by one.
[15:53] <Seveas> what do you want?
[15:53] <Seveas> I can run SQL foo :)
[15:55] <santiago-ve> Well gotta be away for a while~...
[15:55] <hggdh> thanks for the help, santiago-ve
[15:57] <bdmurray> It was more an idea rather than a specific need.  I'm concerned about how current some of the replies / links given are, I think I'll just review them starting from the most popular.
[15:57] <Seveas> bdmurray, the most popular tend to be accurate :)
[15:58] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/159821
[15:58] <Seveas> bdmurray, please don't do a review now, I'll be doing that in about a weeks time anyway
[15:58] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 159821 in amarok "Installing MP3 support crashes Amarok" [Undecided,New]
[15:59] <bdmurray> Seveas: okay, thanks!
[15:59]  * secretlondon thanks seb128 for filing the python-gdata bug with debian as she was just about to
[16:00] <seb128> secretlondon: you are welcome ;-)
[16:00] <bdmurray> Is that something you do regularly?
[16:00] <secretlondon> Bug #201845 is our bug on that packaging issue :)
[16:00] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 201845 in python-gdata "python-gdata needs build-dependencies fixing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201845
[16:00] <secretlondon> link to seb's deb bug
[16:00] <Seveas> no, but it needs to be done for the migration :)
[16:00] <seb128> secretlondon: you can close this one, I've uploaded the change to hardy before filling the debian bug
[16:00] <secretlondon> ah okay
[16:00] <seb128> secretlondon: I was looking at getting the totem youtube thing working out of the box
[16:01] <seb128> but it doesn't work correctly so I'm not sure now
[16:01] <seb128> maybe I'll do a totem-plugins-universe and move it there
[16:01] <secretlondon> ah - thanks
[16:04] <secretlondon> I've closed the bug as fix released as you've uploaded it :)
[16:14] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: 182736
[16:14] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/191475
[16:14] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 191475 in rhythmbox "[hardy] media tab in file management preferences missing applications" [Low,Fix released]
[16:16] <apachelogger_> yuriy: can you take a look at this bug?
[16:16] <apachelogger_> IMHO this shouldn't be implemented anywhere until x-content/* is part of freedesktop.org stuff
[16:17] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/88005
[16:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 88005 in amarok "MASTER [apport] amarokapp crashed with SIGSEGV - malloc_consolidate ()" [High,Incomplete]
[16:17] <afflux> rhythmbox not respecting read-only files when editing tags seems like a "medium" bug to be, what do you think?
[16:17] <afflux> (bug 181742)
[16:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 181742 in rhythmbox "Rhythmbox does not respect file permissions" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181742
[16:24] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/94447 and https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/107562
[16:24] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 94447 in amarok "Can't erase Cover used by various artists" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[16:25] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/95441
[16:25] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 95441 in amarok "Can't retrieve lyrics with amarok when behind a proxy" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[16:27] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/107289
[16:27] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 107289 in amarok "wrong transfer sizes with transkode" [Wishlist,Incomplete]
[16:35] <Nightrose> apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/136522
[16:35] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 136522 in amarok "No automatic iPod sync" [Wishlist,Incomplete]
[16:41] <afflux> time for coffee!
[16:41] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/127352
[16:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 127352 in amarok "Amarok mixes album names while renaming" [Undecided,New]
[16:41] <apachelogger_> afflux: good idea
[16:42]  * apachelogger_ just finishes the current bug
[16:43] <apachelogger_> Nightrose: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156819
[16:43] <apachelogger_> wtf
[16:43] <ubotu> KDE bug 156819 in general "No automatic iPod sync" [Wishlist,Resolved: invalid]
[16:47]  * apachelogger_ takes Nightrose for a coffee
[17:13] <sbarjola> hi, this is my first day,.. how can I help?
[17:15] <james_w> hi sbarjola
[17:16] <james_w> sbarjola: this is the page for coordination of today's work: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313
[17:18] <sbarjola> ok, then I select a bug and begin.. how can I know that no other is working on it?
[17:18] <yuriy> apachelogger_: take a look at which bug?
[17:18] <hggdh> sbarjola: you can assign it to yourself temporarily
[17:19] <hggdh> if a bug has an assignee, it should be left alone. Just make sure you unassign yourself/assign to the correct group when you are done working with it
[17:21] <apachelogger_> yuriy: the one a couple of lines above, before I highlighted you ;-)
[17:21] <yuriy> in rhythmbox?
[17:22] <yuriy> oh it's both, i see
[17:27] <yuriy> apachelogger_: i don't have gnome installed, what am i looking at here?
[17:31] <sbarjola> where I should test the bug.. hardy or that is in the bug?
[17:32] <pedro_> ideally they should be tested on hardy
[17:34] <apachelogger_> yuriy: the gnome file manager has introduce a special mimetype class (x-content) for various device types like cds and stuff
[17:34] <apachelogger_> yuriy: to be available as application for these types the application needs to list the x-content/foobar mimetype in it's desktop file
[17:35] <apachelogger_> the only problem I have with that ... is that x-content is not yet part of the freedesktop mimetype concept
[17:36] <yuriy> ok..
[17:45] <yuriy> apachelogger_: ask Riddell about it?
[17:48] <apachelogger_> yuriy: good point
[17:48] <yuriy> true though, searching fd.o for x-content turns up nothing
[17:50] <apachelogger_> yuriy: according to the related gnome bug reports, they are planing to suggest it for the next revision of the mime stuff
[18:45] <qense> hello
[18:46] <secretlondon> hi qense
[18:46] <wraund> guys i need some serious and big help
[18:46] <wraund> ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo chroot /media/disk/
[18:46] <wraund> malloc: unknown:0: assertion botched
[18:46] <wraund> free: called with unallocated block argument
[18:46] <wraund> last command: (null)
[18:46] <wraund> Aborting...Aborted (core dumped)
[18:46] <wraund> ubuntu@ubuntu:~$
[18:47] <wraund> i am having to use the live disc as my main desktop went down
[18:47] <secretlondon> wraund it'll prob be the libc bug
[18:47] <bdmurray> wraund: you'll want to look at the ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list for help
[18:47] <wraund> bdmurray: cant :P
[18:47] <wraund> the machine doesnt work :P
[18:47] <wraund> secretlondon: so.... how can i fix this?
[18:47] <Nightrose> wraund: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing
[18:47] <wraund> i doubt i can get updates as root or sudo isnt working
[18:48] <Nightrose> meh sorry wrong link
[18:48] <secretlondon> the mailing list has a workround, as does the bug afaik
[18:48] <bdmurray> wraund: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2008-March/000401.html
[18:48] <Nightrose> https://launchpad.net/bugs/201673 this one
[18:48] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 201673 in glibc "REGRESSION: glibc 2.7-9ubuntu1 NSS module broken due to toolchain changes" [Critical,Fix released]
[18:48] <wraund> lemme see..
[18:48] <wraund> typical
[18:48] <wraund> firefox isnt working on the live cd atm
[18:48] <wraund> somethign about :0 xserver
[18:49] <wraund> anyway how will i be able to get and install a patch considering root and sudo dont work
[18:50] <wraund> ?
[18:50] <bdmurray> wraund: "The quickest workaround is to copy an older version of the C library
[18:50] <bdmurray> from the initramfs"
[18:50] <wraund> how
[18:50] <wraund> oh
[18:50] <wraund> please explain
[18:50] <bdmurray> It's quite lengthy
[18:51] <wraund> can you pm me step by step
[18:51] <wraund> i would be forever grateful
[18:51] <wraund> or paste a guide
[19:00] <yuriy> hmm bug 181289 sounds icky, don't really know what could be added to it either
[19:00] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 181289 in amarok "Amarok Crashes Entire System" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181289
[19:02] <Nightrose> yuriy: it is nasty yea - maybe check the amarok bug tracker? or xine bug tracker?
[19:02] <Nightrose> though I have never heard someone complaining about this
[19:07] <amon__> hi guys
[19:08] <amon__> is this the place for hardy bugs
[19:08] <amon__> ?
[19:08] <bdmurray> This is the place for Hardy bug triage and fixing of bugs.
[19:09] <bdmurray> What are you looking for?
[19:09] <amon__> sorry, i have talked too much on skype, so im not used to irc anymore, but i will try and give my best to not generate unecessary lines
[19:09] <secretlondon> hardy support is better at ubuntu+1 though
[19:10] <amon__> audio skips on my hardy setup, xmms does not work
[19:10] <amon__> at all
[19:15] <bdmurray> That sounds more like a configuration issue than a bug.
[19:16] <Gnine> !support
[19:16] <ubotu> The official ubuntu support channel is #ubuntu. Also see http://ubuntu.com/support and http://ubuntuforums.org
[19:16] <Gnine> !hardy
[19:16] <ubotu> Hardy Heron is the code name for the next release of Ubuntu (8.04-LTS), due April 2008 - For more info, see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyHeron - CONSIDER IT TO BE PRE BETA (ALPHA) SOFTWARE - Discussion and support in #ubuntu+1, NOT #ubuntu
[20:36] <wxPython> hello
[20:36] <wxPython> got a patch for a bug
[20:37] <RAOF> Awesome!
[20:37] <wxPython> i wanna post the diff file on launchpad for the approproate bug
[20:37] <wxPython> appropriate
[20:37] <wxPython> i just wanna know one little thingy
[20:37] <wxPython> oh before i go on, please visit this link
[20:38] <wxPython> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=107229&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw
[20:38] <wxPython> this is the diff file
[20:38] <wxPython> the bug is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/18361
[20:38] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 18361 in gnome-panel "Odd selection launchers/menu" [Unknown,Confirmed]
[20:39] <wxPython> i am not so familiar with Launchpad
[20:40] <RAOF> Ok.
[20:40] <jeromeg> wxPython: this patch has already been proposed in gnome bugzilla where you found it
[20:40] <wxPython> i know
[20:40] <jeromeg> as the dev who wrote it commented, it's only a workaround
[20:41] <wxPython> is the action pending now?
[20:41] <jeromeg> wxPython: I think it's better to wait for a proper fix which will be integrated upstream
[20:41] <wxPython> will the final version of Ubuntu include the gnome-panel package with that bug fixed?
[20:42] <wxPython> that's all i wanna know
[20:42] <jeromeg> wxPython: if it get fixed upstream yes
[20:42] <jeromeg> if no, I guess it won't :(
[20:42] <wxPython> :(
[20:42] <wxPython> can i beg to be fixed?
[20:42] <wxPython> :)
[20:42] <jeromeg> wxPython: but this patch has only been committed (a few hours ago)
[20:43] <jeromeg> so I would say
[20:43] <wxPython> was it not tested yet?
[20:43] <jeromeg> wait and see :)
[20:43] <jeromeg> wxPython: i guess the person who worte it tested it
[20:43] <wxPython> i sure hope he finally solved the bug
[20:43] <wxPython> cause it's nearly 3 years old
[20:44] <wxPython> and it's a visual annoyance
[20:44] <jeromeg> wxPython: :)
[20:44] <wxPython> what? :)
[20:44] <jeromeg> just smiling to the "3 year old bug"
[20:45] <wxPython> it IS
[20:45] <jeromeg> some bug get forgotten, unfortunately
[20:45] <jeromeg> wxPython: yes, yes, I know
[20:45] <jeromeg> i can only acknowledge
[20:45] <jeromeg> 2005-06-22
[20:45] <wxPython> this bug is present since Ubuntu Gutsy Alpha 4
[20:45] <wxPython> so it's reeealy old
[20:46] <jeromeg> wxPython: i think it has been here for much longer
[20:46] <wxPython> it was?
[20:46] <jeromeg> anyway
[20:46] <wxPython> someone said he had never seen this bug before until I installed Ubuntu Gutsy Alpha 4
[20:46] <jeromeg> i think it would be great if you could test the patch
[20:46] <wxPython> but it was reported waaay back then in the good old days :D
[20:46] <jeromeg> wxPython: yep :)
[20:46] <wxPython> :)
[20:48] <wxPython> okay, so after this patch is applied to the gnome-panel, the ubuntu team will update hardy with that package and we will live happily ever after without that nasty, visualy annoying bug? :)
[20:48] <jeromeg> wxPython: if it solves the bug without any regression and if the packager of gnome-panel agress, yes
[20:49] <jeromeg> wxPython: but as I said, if the patch is ok, it should be fixed upstream soon, just wait a couple of hours/days to see how the devs react
[20:51] <wxPython> jeromeg okay i will try to stay patient ;)
[20:52] <wxPython> please think positive with me ;)
[20:52] <wxPython> i hope it will be acknowledged
[20:52] <wxPython> since i don't see any other solution :)
[20:53] <jeromeg> no problem, bugs are always frustrating
[20:54] <jeromeg> sorry I got to go
[20:54] <wxPython> wait
[20:54] <wxPython> one more sec
[20:54] <jeromeg> got some homework :(
[20:54] <jeromeg> ok
[20:54] <wxPython> i have notified Vincent Untz about that patch
[20:54] <jeromeg> ok
[20:54] <wxPython> but is GNOME Panel related with the gnome-panel package for Ubuntu?
[20:55] <wxPython> are those two things realted in any way?
[20:55] <wxPython> *related
[20:55] <jeromeg> yes
[20:55] <wxPython> how come?
[20:55] <jeromeg> gnome-panel available in ubuntu is only a package to install easily GNOME Panel
[20:56] <wxPython> when you said "just wait a couple of hours/days to see how the devs react"... did you ment how would Vincent react?
[20:56] <jeromeg> Vincent and others
[20:56] <wxPython> ohð
[20:56] <wxPython> oh
[20:56] <wxPython> uhmmm
[20:56] <wxPython> but how fast would they fix the gnome panel?
[20:57] <jeromeg> wxPython: dunno :) depends on a lot of things
[20:57] <wxPython> would they alter the CVS of the gnome panel or how is this going to be done?
[20:58] <wxPython> i really don't know how this works
[20:58] <jeromeg> wxPython: i'm sorry but i really got to go, in 2 sec, if the patch is accepted, it will be commited to their SVN, and available in the next release of gnome-panel
[20:58] <wxPython> ok
[20:58] <jeromeg> but we can grab the patch for ubuntu, if the package maintainer wants to
[20:58] <wxPython> thanks for everything
[20:58] <jeromeg> no problem
[20:58] <jeromeg> see yoou
[20:58] <jeromeg> *you
[20:58] <wxPython> bye now ;)
[20:59] <jeromeg> :)
[20:59] <wxPython> be good and learn ma boy ;P
[20:59] <wxPython> oh he wait to early to see this
[20:59] <wxPython> :(
[21:02] <Nightrose> yuriy: no you are not @ https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/181289 - I did already :P
[21:02] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 181289 in amarok "Amarok Crashes Entire System" [Undecided,Invalid]
[21:04] <yuriy> Nightrose: yeah i saw. ninja'd by 20 seconds
[21:04] <Nightrose> hehe
[21:04]  * yuriy isn't always a fan of launchpad's concurrency handling
[21:07] <wxPython> amarok?
[21:07] <wxPython> which system does it crash?
[21:07] <wxPython> Ubuntu?
[21:07]  * yuriy is hating planet's reading of wordpress feed even more now
[21:10] <Nightrose> wxPython: yes - but it is not an amarok problem
[21:10] <wxPython> so the title is not appropriate
[21:10] <Nightrose> well it is marked invalit now
[21:10] <wxPython> it should be System crashes Amarok ;)
[21:10] <Nightrose> *invalid
[21:10] <Nightrose> so who cares
[21:11] <wxPython> invalid?
[21:11] <wxPython> meaning what?
[21:11] <wxPython> solved?
[21:11] <wxPython> ignored?
[21:11] <wxPython> what?
[21:11] <Nightrose> no meaning not valid since it is not amaroks fault
[21:11] <yuriy> wxPython: meaning not a bug in amarok, he already filed another bug against the right package
[21:13] <wxPython> oh
[21:13] <wxPython> good
[21:13] <wxPython> can you please give me the link to that bug?
[21:13] <wxPython> not the invalid one
[21:13] <Nightrose> it is linked in the invalid one
[21:13] <wxPython> i wanna read what happens
[21:13] <Nightrose> in a comment
[21:13] <wxPython> oh okay
[21:14] <wxPython> Total system freeze caused by SATA drive
[21:14] <wxPython> lol
[21:14] <wxPython> :D
[21:14] <wxPython> so there was a hardware bug in the SATA drive that caused that bug
[21:15] <wxPython> i mean a driver bug for the SATA drive, there
[21:15] <wxPython> :)
[21:15] <wxPython> so a software bug :)
[21:17] <wxPython> what the hell is this thing? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12424626/hdparminfo.txt
[21:18] <wxPython> it is attatched to the Total system freeze caused by SATA drive  bug report
[21:18] <wxPython> is that the patch for the bug or what?
[21:19] <wxPython> oh
[21:19] <wxPython> sorry
[21:19] <wxPython> didn't read the whole bug report lol
[21:20] <wxPython> his SATA drive sucks then
[21:20] <wxPython> there's no cause for an alarm for other people
[21:20] <wxPython> he should buy a better SATA drive then ;)
[21:20] <wxPython> or ehat?
[21:20] <wxPython> or what?
[21:20] <wxPython> :)
[21:21] <wxPython> he can't even produce the debug data
[21:21] <wxPython> so this is a shame
[21:32] <wraund> is it now safe for hardy users to upgrade to libc6?
[21:32] <wxPython> yes
[21:33] <wxPython> you can try and see
[21:33] <bdmurray> at least from archive.ubuntu.com - it depends on your mirror
[21:33] <wxPython> you probably won't get the latest version yet
[21:33] <wxPython> gotta wait some more
[21:33] <wxPython> mirrors are hell :)
[21:34] <wraund> awesome
[21:34] <wxPython> wraund yup ;)
[21:34] <wraund> ill check my mirror
[21:34] <pochu> wraund: apt-cache madison libc6 to make sure
[21:35] <wraund> wraund@morpheus World of Warcraft % apt-cache madison libc6 libc6 | 2.7-9ubuntu2 | http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages glibc | 2.7-9ubuntu2 | http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources
[21:35] <wraund> wraund@morpheus World of Warcraft %
[21:35] <wraund> sorry about the paste my firefox is bugged
[21:36] <wraund> also ignore the folder ^^
[21:36] <wraund> oh hey pochu :)
[21:36] <pochu> hey hey :)
[21:37] <wraund> is my mirror updated then?
[21:37] <wraund> from that output
[21:38] <pochu> yes, ubuntu2 is the fixed package
[21:39] <wraund> kk
[21:41] <wraund> wahay my machine is stable again :)
[21:42] <wxPython> wraund nice to hear that ;)
[21:42] <wxPython> mine is not
[21:43] <wxPython> reason: using Windows XP :D
[21:43] <wxPython> can't WAIT for ubuntu 8.04 final!
[21:48] <afflux> I'm going to bed now. Good night!
[21:54] <sbarjola> where can i find the moin id?
[21:56] <bdmurray> sbarjola: in your cookies file
[22:03] <sbarjola> thanks,.. what's name has the cookie?
[22:07] <bdmurray> in my cookies.txt file I found wiki.ubuntu.com and a MOIN ID