[00:02] bug 201170 [00:04] bdmurray: did ubotu vanish? [00:05] its not here, certainly [00:05] I quieted him because there was a second one for a while, he seems to have quit now. [00:05] neither are here [00:06] ubotu has been very lagged recently - can be 10 mins or so [00:06] but has just spoken to me ;) [00:12] heh [00:13] " Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)" [00:13] so presumably it is here somewhere [00:14] bug #201170 [00:15] usb problems, http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201643 - does anyone know which package i should add? [00:16] prob kernel without looking at the bug. we have a debugging removal devices page [00:17] blueyed: yes, it probably should mention the channel, though the ubuntu page doesn't mention it either [00:17] oh, now i get what your second comment meant [00:18] savvas: The kernel is correct. I think those errors usually indicate bad cables or a device. [00:23] bdmurray: i didn't get them in previous kernels, the device is kingston datatraveller and just 2 months old, i take care of it pretty well, but i suppose it could break.. [00:24] I might be wrong about the cable. [00:25] there's no cable :\ [00:25] it's a flash disk [00:26] bah i'll have to go [00:26] bdmurray: do you think i need to send any other logs? [00:26] i've sent the ones that i thought important [00:27] That's normally what the kernel team looks for so it should be good to go. [00:27] ok thanks [00:27] I've updated the package for you too. [00:28] have a joyful night and don't let the ubuntu bugs bite :) [03:09] :) === boomer` is now known as boomer [05:19] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/201685 [05:39] * techno_freak looks for the dupe-hunter === macd_ is now known as macd [08:50] I'm confirming one of the rhythmbox-bugs marked incomplete on the list. My first semi-bug contribution :D [08:53] welcome ;) [08:55] thank you. [08:55] Until I learn some more programming, I probably wont be of much help, thougj === wolfger_ is now known as wolfger [10:21] bug #201673 looks like 'fun', glad I was asleep and missed it [10:27] secretlondon: indeed it was fun... [10:28] it looks like it ;) [10:30] secretlondon, missed you to hunt dupes :p [10:30] :-) part of being in the cutting, razor-sharp edge [10:30] techno_freak :) [10:40] what do I do with a bug that needs to be fixed by upstream and is in their bugtracker already? [10:41] link the bugs and set it to...? [10:41] hmm rather a wish than a bug [10:41] link our bug to theirs [10:41] also affects project [10:41] ok thx [10:42] that's all? [10:42] also set the LP bug to "Triaged" [10:42] Nightrose: ^^ [10:42] huh [10:42] yeah - launchpad will get the status from the bug automatically [10:43] you may also add a note to the upstream bug with the LP bug URL [10:43] good for cross-referencing [10:43] hggdh: I don´t think I can do that - I am in the Amarok team and can work on amarok bugs - but can´t seem to set them as triaged [10:43] Nightrose: give me the bug #, and I will do it [10:43] ok sec [10:44] (after setting the "also affects project") [10:44] hggdh: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/136520 [10:47] Nightrose: it is always good to add a comment on why you set the upstream bug -- this allows for the reporter, and others, to easily see why it was done. I am setting as triaged, and adding a small comment on that [10:47] done [10:47] comment already added ;-) [10:47] thx [10:47] oh, you already had... [10:47] I am sorry [10:48] hehe no prob [10:48] Nightrose: thanks for helping, BTW :-) [10:49] no prob - a lot of the Amarok devs are Kubuntu users - so we are interested in triaging these bugs [10:49] cool :) [10:49] and since today is hug day... [10:49] ;-) [10:49] good... I personally use Amarok, but under Gnome [10:49] hehe we are fine with that [10:49] * hggdh hugs Nightrose [10:49] * Nightrose rehugs hggdh [10:50] * secretlondon hugs amarok [10:50] :p [10:50] * secretlondon also uses some kde apps under gnome [10:52] nixternal: damn you for taking all my nice bugs in the wiki ;-) [10:56] Nightrose: (I forgot to tell you that) setting bugs to Triaged requires one to be a member of the bug-control team. You can apply for it after some time (usually a month) of bug triaging. You are welcome to, if you so want [10:56] to [10:56] :-) [10:56] ok thanks - will do === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon [11:44] nixternal: sorry - I was talking crap - forget what I said :P [11:49] * secretlondon laughs at Nightrose [11:49] ;-) [11:49] He's a big boy, I'm sure he can take it! [11:49] haha yea [11:50] nixternal: btw I applied for eV membership on monday - now is your turn *g* [11:54] folks!, today is the rhythmbox & totem hug day https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313 [11:54] and if you're using KDE and amarok you may want to look to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313/KDE [11:55] pedro_: I am already on the amarok bugs ;-) [11:55] lets keep this hug days rocking! [11:55] Nightrose: rock on! === heno_ is now known as heno [12:54] Hey [12:56] hello Iulian, how are you today? [12:56] ready to squash some bugs? ;-) [12:59] I'm doing fine, thanks. [12:59] I am ready! [13:00] rock! [13:00] By the way - Happy Hug Day everyone! [13:04] :) [13:04] Hi secretlondon :) [13:04] Hi Iulian :) [13:05] hurra, bugday ;) [13:05] woohoo [13:06] is you're running GNOME https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313 [13:06] or KDE https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313/KDE === ccooke_ is now known as ccooke === jeroen_ is now known as jamjam === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [13:37] can someone close https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/165036 please? [13:37] I think the poster got p*issed at me enough by now ;-) [13:38] package fetching failed with "403 forbidden" on a few packages [13:39] Gnine: libc ones? [13:39] it should be fixed shortly [13:40] yes.. and a couple others.. cool. roger that [13:41] Nightrose, did you report the issue upstream or just talk with the upstream developers by im or irc? [13:41] sourcercito: I am upstream [13:41] on x86_64 the issue was a little more drastic [13:41] i'm asking in case there's any reference to that upstream [13:41] ok, closing it then ;) [13:41] thank you ;-) [13:41] anytime [13:43] Nightrose: ugh... bad experience... [13:44] happy hug day! [13:44] hggdh: well I have to deal with a lot of this so I don´t really care - sometimes people just don´t understand ;-) [13:46] thekorn, happy hug day back to you ;) [13:49] * pedro_ hugs the whole bugsquad [13:49] how nice is the ubuntu pulse http://pulseofubuntu.tweetpeek.com/ [13:50] there's plenty of people in just a few days [13:56] * sourcercito peeking [13:59] c0ol [14:27] hmm what to do with bugs like https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/182359 ? [14:29] Nightrose: it's ok to close it as invalid [14:30] thx [14:30] you're welcome [15:07] ahoy [15:09] raise the sails! [15:12] morning [15:14] morning afflux [15:14] hi secretlondon [15:18] Nightrose: replyto:"bugs.launchpad.net" [15:18] morning [15:18] thx ;-) [15:18] * yuriy hugs Nightrose and apachelogger_ [15:18] * apachelogger_ hugs yuriy and Nightrose [15:18] hey yuriy :) [15:18] hi yuriy [15:19] hi afflux [15:19] uuh, I've fallen back in 5-a-day. [15:19] :( [15:20] I'll catch up today, I promise :P [15:20] :P [15:20] Nightrose: I thought you had to be selected or something for the eV, I didn't know you could just apply [15:21] nixternal: you just have to ask someone to recommend you - I asked danimo [15:21] * yuriy would hug parthan/techno_freak too but doesn't see him [15:21] or rather danimo asked me [15:21] ahh, nobody will recommend me :( [15:21] nixternal :( [15:21] nixternal: I am sure Riddell would - as would I once I am in ;-) [15:22] nixternal: just ask one of the amarokers, they do everything for money [15:22] hehe [15:22] really _everything_ [15:22] hahahaha, I bet [15:22] apachelogger_ photos? [15:23] guys https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/120791 <-- i think it should be marked as invalid [15:24] i made a comment there tho [15:24] secretlondon: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/viewPhoto?uname=apachelogger&aid=5129629037405096673&iid=5129629166254115570 [15:24] nooo, firefox can't just crash when I'm going for bugs :( [15:25] apachelogger_, that doesn't show amarok devs doing anything for money ;) [15:25] hm, apparently firefox has a bug which is preventing the triage of bugs [15:25] well my firefox is okay [15:25] probably [15:25] secretlondon: I am getting makeup there :P [15:25] ah okay [15:27] santiago-ve: marked as invalid - thx [15:28] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/181293 this one can be marked as confirmed, i've experienced the same on kubuntu feisty 7.04 [15:28] santiago-ve: why don't you do it? [15:29] yuriy, done then :p [15:30] santiago-ve: don't forget to mark it off on the wiki : ) [15:30] since im new on this i dont want to do things bad xD! [15:31] doing things wronger than me is pretty much impossible [15:31] santiago-ve: on that one it would help to have some more circumstances under which the crash happens [15:32] santiago-ve: also changing the title to something descriptive like "amarok crashes when doing xxx with error yyy" would be helpful [15:33] santiago-ve: it might be also nice to have a backtrace with symbol resolution (i.e., without ?? in the function names)... I am not sure we can open upstream with the current BT [15:33] gimmi a sec... i dont remember my wikilogin xD! (different machine) [15:34] well you got two people from upstream here - you can just ask ;-) [15:35] Nightrose: is the stacktrace good for upstream? [15:35] :-) [15:35] would be better to have more ;-) [15:35] * hggdh bows for Nightrose [15:36] hehe [15:36] done, got in... so now how i mark "#181293" on the wiki?... i marked it as confirmed on LP~ [15:36] santiago-ve: see the first paragraph in the wikipage [15:42] kay [15:43] do we have people from rhythmbox upstream here too? [15:44] forwarded bug 199319 to gnome-bugs 522247 [15:44] Nightrose: bug 147616 [15:45] afflux: no we don't have rhythmbox/totem (they're the same) upstream this time [15:45] Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/147616 [15:45] stupid bots [15:45] haha [15:45] we're spoiled :P [15:45] pedro_: right, it's not urgent ;) [15:46] bots aren't working pretty nice ATM :-( [15:46] yeah i know :-) [15:47] pedro_: I could unquiet ubotu [15:47] no no! [15:47] what did he do? [15:47] It won't announce that just happens u-b-a [15:47] ty [15:47] Pici, where else is it muted? [15:47] i thought it just wasn't supposed to be making announcements, but still respond to people mentioning bugs [15:47] Seveas: just here because of the lag [15:48] ubuntulog is our new bot? [15:48] ubuntulog: wake up! [15:48] ubuntulog is only for logging... [15:48] pedro_: that's the logger that goes to irclogs.ubuntu.com [15:48] damn it! [15:48] bug 178058 [15:48] Seveas: not anywhere else that i remember. i'll check it from a script [15:48] Launchpad bug 178058 in ubuntu "[Hardy] Desktop Screen extends too far" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178058 [15:49] tick tack tick tack [15:49] somebody on kde3 try bug 121071? should be easy to test [15:49] Launchpad bug 121071 in amarok "With Kicker Media Control Applet, Amarok tooltip misbehaves" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121071 [15:49] ubotu: i love you [15:49] Sorry, I don't know anything about i love you - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi [15:49] you don't? [15:49] :-( [15:49] pedro_, if launchpad is slow, ubotu is slow [15:49] it fetches info from launchpad [15:49] pedro_: you could teach ubotu about love [15:49] hahaha [15:49] bdmurray, no robo-X-rated scenes here please ;) [15:49] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/178189 [15:49] Launchpad bug 178189 in amarok "amarokapp crashed with SIGSEGV trying to play a WMA file" [Undecided,Incomplete] [15:50] Seveas: ubotu was having connectivity issues I thought, leaving due to flooding? [15:50] bdmurray, all fixed when I came back from holiday [15:50] Ah, well great! [15:50] it's working nicely on u-b-announce [15:51] though you might see some odd-ish behaviour and an extra bot soon [15:51] I'm rewriting the bugger [15:51] i think 144132, 155586 and 144132 are duplicates of 181293, or may be different crashes... tho i still think they're duplicates [15:51] bug 144132, 155586 and 144132 [15:52] Launchpad bug 144132 in amarok "1.4.7 [___stripped][validity: 0.53][frames: 97][xine]" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/144132 [15:52] Launchpad bug 155586 in amarok "1.4.7 [___stripped][validity: 0.70][frames: 151][xine]" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155586 [15:52] Seveas: Are the factoids kept in the source code? [15:52] bdmurray, no [15:52] bdmurray, http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/ [15:52] they're currently kept in an sqlite database, but will move to mysql [15:53] Hmm, I was trying to think an easier way to update them rather than going through them one by one. [15:53] what do you want? [15:53] I can run SQL foo :) [15:55] Well gotta be away for a while~... [15:55] thanks for the help, santiago-ve [15:57] It was more an idea rather than a specific need. I'm concerned about how current some of the replies / links given are, I think I'll just review them starting from the most popular. [15:57] bdmurray, the most popular tend to be accurate :) [15:58] Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/159821 [15:58] bdmurray, please don't do a review now, I'll be doing that in about a weeks time anyway [15:58] Launchpad bug 159821 in amarok "Installing MP3 support crashes Amarok" [Undecided,New] [15:59] Seveas: okay, thanks! [15:59] * secretlondon thanks seb128 for filing the python-gdata bug with debian as she was just about to [16:00] secretlondon: you are welcome ;-) [16:00] Is that something you do regularly? [16:00] Bug #201845 is our bug on that packaging issue :) [16:00] Launchpad bug 201845 in python-gdata "python-gdata needs build-dependencies fixing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201845 [16:00] link to seb's deb bug [16:00] no, but it needs to be done for the migration :) [16:00] secretlondon: you can close this one, I've uploaded the change to hardy before filling the debian bug [16:00] ah okay [16:00] secretlondon: I was looking at getting the totem youtube thing working out of the box [16:01] but it doesn't work correctly so I'm not sure now [16:01] maybe I'll do a totem-plugins-universe and move it there [16:01] ah - thanks [16:04] I've closed the bug as fix released as you've uploaded it :) [16:14] Nightrose: 182736 [16:14] Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/191475 [16:14] Launchpad bug 191475 in rhythmbox "[hardy] media tab in file management preferences missing applications" [Low,Fix released] [16:16] yuriy: can you take a look at this bug? [16:16] IMHO this shouldn't be implemented anywhere until x-content/* is part of freedesktop.org stuff [16:17] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/88005 [16:17] Launchpad bug 88005 in amarok "MASTER [apport] amarokapp crashed with SIGSEGV - malloc_consolidate ()" [High,Incomplete] [16:17] rhythmbox not respecting read-only files when editing tags seems like a "medium" bug to be, what do you think? [16:17] (bug 181742) [16:17] Launchpad bug 181742 in rhythmbox "Rhythmbox does not respect file permissions" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181742 [16:24] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/94447 and https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/107562 [16:24] Launchpad bug 94447 in amarok "Can't erase Cover used by various artists" [Undecided,Incomplete] [16:25] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/95441 [16:25] Launchpad bug 95441 in amarok "Can't retrieve lyrics with amarok when behind a proxy" [Undecided,Incomplete] [16:27] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/107289 [16:27] Launchpad bug 107289 in amarok "wrong transfer sizes with transkode" [Wishlist,Incomplete] [16:35] apachelogger_: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/136522 [16:35] Launchpad bug 136522 in amarok "No automatic iPod sync" [Wishlist,Incomplete] [16:41] time for coffee! === pochu is now known as dxdx [16:41] Nightrose: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/127352 [16:41] Launchpad bug 127352 in amarok "Amarok mixes album names while renaming" [Undecided,New] === dxdx is now known as pochu [16:41] afflux: good idea [16:42] * apachelogger_ just finishes the current bug [16:43] Nightrose: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156819 [16:43] wtf [16:43] KDE bug 156819 in general "No automatic iPod sync" [Wishlist,Resolved: invalid] [16:47] * apachelogger_ takes Nightrose for a coffee [17:13] hi, this is my first day,.. how can I help? [17:15] hi sbarjola [17:16] sbarjola: this is the page for coordination of today's work: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080313 === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 === Kirrus_ is now known as Kirrus [17:18] ok, then I select a bug and begin.. how can I know that no other is working on it? [17:18] apachelogger_: take a look at which bug? [17:18] sbarjola: you can assign it to yourself temporarily [17:19] if a bug has an assignee, it should be left alone. Just make sure you unassign yourself/assign to the correct group when you are done working with it [17:21] yuriy: the one a couple of lines above, before I highlighted you ;-) [17:21] in rhythmbox? [17:22] oh it's both, i see [17:27] apachelogger_: i don't have gnome installed, what am i looking at here? [17:31] where I should test the bug.. hardy or that is in the bug? [17:32] ideally they should be tested on hardy [17:34] yuriy: the gnome file manager has introduce a special mimetype class (x-content) for various device types like cds and stuff [17:34] yuriy: to be available as application for these types the application needs to list the x-content/foobar mimetype in it's desktop file [17:35] the only problem I have with that ... is that x-content is not yet part of the freedesktop mimetype concept [17:36] ok.. [17:45] apachelogger_: ask Riddell about it? [17:48] yuriy: good point [17:48] true though, searching fd.o for x-content turns up nothing [17:50] yuriy: according to the related gnome bug reports, they are planing to suggest it for the next revision of the mime stuff === doom_ is now known as DOOM_NX [18:45] hello [18:46] hi qense [18:46] guys i need some serious and big help [18:46] ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo chroot /media/disk/ [18:46] malloc: unknown:0: assertion botched [18:46] free: called with unallocated block argument [18:46] last command: (null) [18:46] Aborting...Aborted (core dumped) [18:46] ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ [18:47] i am having to use the live disc as my main desktop went down [18:47] wraund it'll prob be the libc bug [18:47] wraund: you'll want to look at the ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list for help [18:47] bdmurray: cant :P [18:47] the machine doesnt work :P [18:47] secretlondon: so.... how can i fix this? [18:47] wraund: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing [18:47] i doubt i can get updates as root or sudo isnt working [18:48] meh sorry wrong link [18:48] the mailing list has a workround, as does the bug afaik [18:48] wraund: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2008-March/000401.html [18:48] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201673 this one [18:48] Launchpad bug 201673 in glibc "REGRESSION: glibc 2.7-9ubuntu1 NSS module broken due to toolchain changes" [Critical,Fix released] [18:48] lemme see.. [18:48] typical [18:48] firefox isnt working on the live cd atm [18:48] somethign about :0 xserver [18:49] anyway how will i be able to get and install a patch considering root and sudo dont work [18:50] ? [18:50] wraund: "The quickest workaround is to copy an older version of the C library [18:50] from the initramfs" [18:50] how [18:50] oh [18:50] please explain [18:50] It's quite lengthy [18:51] can you pm me step by step [18:51] i would be forever grateful [18:51] or paste a guide [19:00] hmm bug 181289 sounds icky, don't really know what could be added to it either [19:00] Launchpad bug 181289 in amarok "Amarok Crashes Entire System" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181289 [19:02] yuriy: it is nasty yea - maybe check the amarok bug tracker? or xine bug tracker? [19:02] though I have never heard someone complaining about this [19:07] hi guys [19:08] is this the place for hardy bugs [19:08] ? [19:08] This is the place for Hardy bug triage and fixing of bugs. [19:09] What are you looking for? [19:09] sorry, i have talked too much on skype, so im not used to irc anymore, but i will try and give my best to not generate unecessary lines [19:09] hardy support is better at ubuntu+1 though [19:10] audio skips on my hardy setup, xmms does not work [19:10] at all [19:15] That sounds more like a configuration issue than a bug. [19:16] !support [19:16] The official ubuntu support channel is #ubuntu. Also see http://ubuntu.com/support and http://ubuntuforums.org [19:16] !hardy [19:16] Hardy Heron is the code name for the next release of Ubuntu (8.04-LTS), due April 2008 - For more info, see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyHeron - CONSIDER IT TO BE PRE BETA (ALPHA) SOFTWARE - Discussion and support in #ubuntu+1, NOT #ubuntu === ember_ is now known as ember === andrea-bs is now known as BeeBot === BeeBot is now known as andrea-bs [20:36] hello [20:36] got a patch for a bug [20:37] Awesome! [20:37] i wanna post the diff file on launchpad for the approproate bug [20:37] appropriate [20:37] i just wanna know one little thingy [20:37] oh before i go on, please visit this link [20:38] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=107229&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw [20:38] this is the diff file [20:38] the bug is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/18361 [20:38] Launchpad bug 18361 in gnome-panel "Odd selection launchers/menu" [Unknown,Confirmed] [20:39] i am not so familiar with Launchpad [20:40] Ok. [20:40] wxPython: this patch has already been proposed in gnome bugzilla where you found it [20:40] i know [20:40] as the dev who wrote it commented, it's only a workaround [20:41] is the action pending now? [20:41] wxPython: I think it's better to wait for a proper fix which will be integrated upstream [20:41] will the final version of Ubuntu include the gnome-panel package with that bug fixed? [20:42] that's all i wanna know [20:42] wxPython: if it get fixed upstream yes [20:42] if no, I guess it won't :( [20:42] :( [20:42] can i beg to be fixed? [20:42] :) [20:42] wxPython: but this patch has only been committed (a few hours ago) [20:43] so I would say [20:43] was it not tested yet? [20:43] wait and see :) [20:43] wxPython: i guess the person who worte it tested it [20:43] i sure hope he finally solved the bug [20:43] cause it's nearly 3 years old [20:44] and it's a visual annoyance [20:44] wxPython: :) [20:44] what? :) [20:44] just smiling to the "3 year old bug" [20:45] it IS [20:45] some bug get forgotten, unfortunately [20:45] wxPython: yes, yes, I know [20:45] i can only acknowledge [20:45] 2005-06-22 [20:45] this bug is present since Ubuntu Gutsy Alpha 4 [20:45] so it's reeealy old [20:46] wxPython: i think it has been here for much longer [20:46] it was? [20:46] anyway [20:46] someone said he had never seen this bug before until I installed Ubuntu Gutsy Alpha 4 [20:46] i think it would be great if you could test the patch [20:46] but it was reported waaay back then in the good old days :D [20:46] wxPython: yep :) [20:46] :) [20:48] okay, so after this patch is applied to the gnome-panel, the ubuntu team will update hardy with that package and we will live happily ever after without that nasty, visualy annoying bug? :) [20:48] wxPython: if it solves the bug without any regression and if the packager of gnome-panel agress, yes [20:49] wxPython: but as I said, if the patch is ok, it should be fixed upstream soon, just wait a couple of hours/days to see how the devs react [20:51] jeromeg okay i will try to stay patient ;) [20:52] please think positive with me ;) [20:52] i hope it will be acknowledged [20:52] since i don't see any other solution :) [20:53] no problem, bugs are always frustrating [20:54] sorry I got to go [20:54] wait [20:54] one more sec [20:54] got some homework :( [20:54] ok [20:54] i have notified Vincent Untz about that patch [20:54] ok [20:54] but is GNOME Panel related with the gnome-panel package for Ubuntu? [20:55] are those two things realted in any way? [20:55] *related [20:55] yes [20:55] how come? [20:55] gnome-panel available in ubuntu is only a package to install easily GNOME Panel [20:56] when you said "just wait a couple of hours/days to see how the devs react"... did you ment how would Vincent react? [20:56] Vincent and others [20:56] ohð [20:56] oh [20:56] uhmmm [20:56] but how fast would they fix the gnome panel? [20:57] wxPython: dunno :) depends on a lot of things [20:57] would they alter the CVS of the gnome panel or how is this going to be done? [20:58] i really don't know how this works [20:58] wxPython: i'm sorry but i really got to go, in 2 sec, if the patch is accepted, it will be commited to their SVN, and available in the next release of gnome-panel [20:58] ok [20:58] but we can grab the patch for ubuntu, if the package maintainer wants to [20:58] thanks for everything [20:58] no problem [20:58] see yoou [20:58] *you [20:58] bye now ;) [20:59] :) [20:59] be good and learn ma boy ;P [20:59] oh he wait to early to see this [20:59] :( [21:02] yuriy: no you are not @ https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/+bug/181289 - I did already :P [21:02] Launchpad bug 181289 in amarok "Amarok Crashes Entire System" [Undecided,Invalid] [21:04] Nightrose: yeah i saw. ninja'd by 20 seconds [21:04] hehe [21:04] * yuriy isn't always a fan of launchpad's concurrency handling [21:07] amarok? [21:07] which system does it crash? [21:07] Ubuntu? [21:07] * yuriy is hating planet's reading of wordpress feed even more now [21:10] wxPython: yes - but it is not an amarok problem [21:10] so the title is not appropriate [21:10] well it is marked invalit now [21:10] it should be System crashes Amarok ;) [21:10] *invalid [21:10] so who cares [21:11] invalid? [21:11] meaning what? [21:11] solved? [21:11] ignored? [21:11] what? [21:11] no meaning not valid since it is not amaroks fault [21:11] wxPython: meaning not a bug in amarok, he already filed another bug against the right package [21:13] oh [21:13] good [21:13] can you please give me the link to that bug? [21:13] not the invalid one [21:13] it is linked in the invalid one [21:13] i wanna read what happens [21:13] in a comment [21:13] oh okay [21:14] Total system freeze caused by SATA drive [21:14] lol [21:14] :D [21:14] so there was a hardware bug in the SATA drive that caused that bug [21:15] i mean a driver bug for the SATA drive, there [21:15] :) [21:15] so a software bug :) [21:17] what the hell is this thing? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12424626/hdparminfo.txt [21:18] it is attatched to the Total system freeze caused by SATA drive bug report [21:18] is that the patch for the bug or what? [21:19] oh [21:19] sorry [21:19] didn't read the whole bug report lol [21:20] his SATA drive sucks then [21:20] there's no cause for an alarm for other people [21:20] he should buy a better SATA drive then ;) [21:20] or ehat? [21:20] or what? [21:20] :) [21:21] he can't even produce the debug data [21:21] so this is a shame [21:32] is it now safe for hardy users to upgrade to libc6? [21:32] yes [21:33] you can try and see [21:33] at least from archive.ubuntu.com - it depends on your mirror [21:33] you probably won't get the latest version yet [21:33] gotta wait some more [21:33] mirrors are hell :) [21:34] awesome [21:34] wraund yup ;) [21:34] ill check my mirror [21:34] wraund: apt-cache madison libc6 to make sure [21:35] wraund@morpheus World of Warcraft % apt-cache madison libc6 libc6 | 2.7-9ubuntu2 | http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages glibc | 2.7-9ubuntu2 | http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources [21:35] wraund@morpheus World of Warcraft % [21:35] sorry about the paste my firefox is bugged [21:36] also ignore the folder ^^ [21:36] oh hey pochu :) [21:36] hey hey :) [21:37] is my mirror updated then? [21:37] from that output [21:38] yes, ubuntu2 is the fixed package [21:39] kk [21:41] wahay my machine is stable again :) [21:42] wraund nice to hear that ;) [21:42] mine is not [21:43] reason: using Windows XP :D [21:43] can't WAIT for ubuntu 8.04 final! [21:48] I'm going to bed now. Good night! [21:54] where can i find the moin id? [21:56] sbarjola: in your cookies file [22:03] thanks,.. what's name has the cookie? [22:07] in my cookies.txt file I found wiki.ubuntu.com and a MOIN ID === jacobmp92 is now known as jacob === ZarroBoogs is now known as Pici