=== visualdeception is now known as [IN]visuald === tritium is now known as [NM]tritium === Heartsbane is now known as [UT]Heartsbane === [NM]tritium is now known as tritium[NM] === [UT]Heartsbane is now known as Heartsbane[UT] === Zelut is now known as Zelut[UT] === Heartsbane[UT] is now known as Heartsbane === Zelut[UT] is now known as Zelut [13:10] ugh.... anybody here for the MOTU Q&A session today? [13:10] sorry, I'm late [13:12] * Iulian waves [13:12] Hiya dholbach [13:13] It seems that I'm the only one here :) [13:13] hey Iulian [13:13] :-) [13:13] I was completely drowned and didn't notice the time :) [13:13] so how are you doing? any questions you brought with yout today? :) [13:14] Yeah, me too, my mom was playing and I forgot about the session. [13:14] I'm doing fine, thank you :) [13:14] Well, not really. [13:14] hehe :) [13:14] you've been working on quite some patches in the last time, didn't you? [13:15] Yes, that's right. [13:15] 10 packages to be exactly. [13:15] nice [13:15] good work [13:16] Heh, thanks ;) [13:16] I think that's all for Hardy. [13:16] * Iulian is waiting for intrepid. [13:17] it's fine to submit them package for intrepid already ;) [13:18] brb [13:18] Now I'm thinking to upgrade nxtvepg from 2.7.6 to 2.8 [13:18] Okay [13:26] re [13:26] Hey [13:26] :-) [13:27] Well, like I said I'm thinking to upgrade nxtvepg to 2.8 [13:27] cool [13:27] It shouldn't be so hard though [13:27] did you try to play with it a bit already? [13:28] Nop, I was a bit confused about it. Should I wait to be uploaded to Debian first? [13:28] Or I can make it now and submit to Debian as well. [13:28] yeah both is fine [13:29] I have enough time to start play with it. [13:29] :) [13:29] This will go in Intrepid right? [13:29] I don't see why not :) [13:30] I mean, it can't be uploaded to Hardy [13:30] you'd first have to fix it [13:31] you'd first have to upgrade it to see if it works, then ask for a freeze exception [13:31] does that make sense? [13:32] Ohh, ok, I will take a look at the upstream's changelog to see if there are some real changes. [13:32] Yea [13:32] If not, I should wait for Intrepid. [13:33] that sounds good [13:33] Is that correct? :) [13:33] Okay [13:33] if it's a bugfix only release we can try to get it still in [13:33] if not we can still backport it [13:33] Aww, yes, you're right. [13:34] Forgot about the backport ;) [13:34] so how do you like your MOTU journey up until now? [13:34] I think it's really great. [13:36] awesome :) [13:36] anything you'd like to be different? [13:37] To be honest it's really excellent how it is now. [13:38] And shouldn't be any changes. :) [13:40] Anyway, it would be great if we can have a class about 'How to sync/merge' [13:41] yes [13:41] we should definitely have it early in the release cycle [13:41] And what's the difference between a sync and merge. [13:41] in a sync we copy over the source package from debian [13:41] That's great! [13:41] we completely overwrite our changes [13:41] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [13:42] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging describes the process where we merge the changes ranging from manually to semi-automatically :) [13:42] Cool [13:44] yeah :) [13:45] Heh, great, thanks! [13:45] anytime === allee_ is now known as allee === asac_ is now known as asac === neversfelde_ is now known as neversfelde