| === kiko is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === kiko-zzz is now known as kiko | ||
| === danilo_ is now known as danilos | ||
| flacoste | do we have a chair? | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| danilos | nobody volunteered so far | 14:01 |
| sinzui | do we have anyone who knows how to play with the bot | 14:01 |
| gmb | Isn't statik chairing? | 14:01 |
| gmb | Or was that last week? | 14:02 |
| intellectronica | gmb: statik apologised that he can't chair today | 14:02 |
| sinzui | statik: has a conflicting appointment | 14:02 |
| gmb | Any volunteers? | 14:02 |
| intellectronica | i propose gmb ;) | 14:03 |
| * gmb saw that coming | 14:03 | |
| gmb | #startmeeting | 14:03 |
| MootBot | Meeting started at 15:03. The chair is gmb. | 14:03 |
| MootBot | Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] | 14:03 |
| gmb | Right. | 14:03 |
| gmb | Welcome, folks, to the AMEU reviewer meeting. | 14:04 |
| gmb | Our agenda for today is... | 14:04 |
| * gmb hunts | 14:04 | |
| gmb | * Roll call | 14:04 |
| gmb | * Next meeting | 14:04 |
| gmb | * Action items | 14:04 |
| gmb | * Queue status | 14:04 |
| gmb | * Mentoring update | 14:04 |
| gmb | * Review process | 14:04 |
| gmb | So. | 14:04 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Roll call | 14:04 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Roll call | 14:04 |
| danilos | me | 14:04 |
| sinzui | me | 14:04 |
| bac | me | 14:04 |
| intellectronica | me | 14:04 |
| gmb | flacoste: You? | 14:05 |
| jt2 | me | 14:05 |
| salgado | me | 14:05 |
| allenap | me | 14:05 |
| flacoste | me | 14:05 |
| gmb | Okay. Feel free to drag other reviewers in if you see them :) | 14:05 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Next meeting | 14:06 |
| kiko | me | 14:06 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Next meeting | 14:06 |
| * kiko yays for MootBot | 14:06 | |
| gmb | Same time same place? | 14:06 |
| gmb | [AGREED] Next meeting 2008-03-26 14:00 UTC | 14:06 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: Next meeting 2008-03-26 14:00 UTC | 14:06 |
| gmb | Anyone know they won't be able to make the next meeting? | 14:06 |
| gmb | I think I'm going to miss it actually. | 14:07 |
| BjornT | me | 14:07 |
| gmb | Right, so I won't be here next week. | 14:07 |
| gmb | But barry will be back, so at least we'll have a chairman :) | 14:08 |
| gmb | So, moving on | 14:08 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Action items | 14:08 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Action items | 14:08 |
| gmb | * gmb to hack review-submit to enforce 800 line limit. | 14:08 |
| * gmb FAIL | 14:08 | |
| gmb | ... and we'll leave that on the list | 14:09 |
| gmb | * schwuk to work with mwhudson to get instructions for running loggerhead onto the wiki | 14:09 |
| gmb | schwuk: Around? | 14:09 |
| schwuk | gmb: yes - forgot the meeting had moved | 14:09 |
| schwuk | gmb: https://launchpad.canonical.com/RunningLoggerhead | 14:09 |
| gmb | schwuk: You have an action item re: loggerhead. What's the status of that? | 14:09 |
| gmb | Ah, cool! | 14:10 |
| bigjools | me, sorry, late | 14:10 |
| gmb | schwuk gets a coconut. | 14:10 |
| schwuk | w00t! | 14:10 |
| gmb | [TOPIOC | 14:10 |
| gmb | *sigh* | 14:10 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] | 14:10 |
| MootBot | New Topic: | 14:10 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Queue status | 14:10 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Queue status | 14:10 |
| gmb | Can you tell it's my first time, folks? | 14:10 |
| gmb | The queue looks relatively clean. There are a couple of branches that have been there for a while but they belong to jamesh and jml... | 14:11 |
| Rinchen | mootbot virgin? :-) | 14:11 |
| gmb | Chairman virgin, never mind MootBot. | 14:11 |
| Rinchen | aye aye | 14:11 |
| gmb | Does anyone know the status of those branches? | 14:12 |
| gmb | [ACTION] gmb to contact jamesh and jml about the status of their overdue branches | 14:12 |
| MootBot | ACTION received: gmb to contact jamesh and jml about the status of their overdue branches | 14:12 |
| intellectronica | one branch left on the queue which i'm reviewing and will finish after the meeting | 14:12 |
| gmb | intellectronica: Cool. | 14:12 |
| gmb | I think that things have been moving pretty smoothly queue wise | 14:13 |
| gmb | PQM's been struggling to keep up :) | 14:13 |
| gmb | So, shooting onwards towards apotheosis... | 14:13 |
| danilos | maybe an idea for new meeting topic? 'PQM status' :) | 14:13 |
| gmb | danilos: Only if you want to hear me moan about getting rejected all the time :) | 14:13 |
| danilos | :) | 14:14 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Mentoring update | 14:14 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Mentoring update | 14:14 |
| gmb | Any mentors / mentees got anything to say at this point? | 14:14 |
| sinzui | schwuk: I think you should take an on-call slot | 14:14 |
| sinzui | schwuk: you will have to when you graduate anyway | 14:15 |
| schwuk | I was just going to say that I think I need to pick up more branches | 14:15 |
| gmb | Right. | 14:15 |
| gmb | sinzui, schwuk: In my experience, sharing an on-call slot works well. | 14:15 |
| sinzui | It's hard to get branches if you not on-call | 14:15 |
| bac | allenap probably a good idea for you too. how are your tuesdays? | 14:16 |
| allenap | bac, Tuesdays are fine, so sign me up. | 14:16 |
| bigjools | I was going to try and join gmb for on-call but Soyuz has been freakishly busy this cycle :( | 14:16 |
| bac | it's a wiki -- sign yourself up! | 14:16 |
| gmb | [AGREED] allenap to take Tuesday on-call review slot with bac | 14:16 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: allenap to take Tuesday on-call review slot with bac | 14:16 |
| gmb | bigjools: I was going to say that, but I saw your status on Monday and thought I'd give you some peace. | 14:17 |
| gmb | bigjools: Are you going to be busy this monday coming? | 14:17 |
| schwuk | Sharing the slot won't work for the next couple of weeks - Public holiday this Friday and planned leave next Friday. I'll see about taking another day next week. | 14:17 |
| bigjools | gmb: hopefully not, it's easter | 14:17 |
| schwuk | gmb: Bank Holiday on Monday | 14:17 |
| gmb | Hah. | 14:17 |
| gmb | Spot the ignorant heathen. | 14:18 |
| schwuk | gmb: I'd have forgiven you if you weren't, you know, *British*. | 14:18 |
| * gmb fails again | 14:18 | |
| gmb | Oh well. | 14:18 |
| gmb | So, schwuk, you'll look at doing on-call some time next week, then. | 14:18 |
| schwuk | gmb: yes - I'll update the rota. | 14:19 |
| gmb | bigjools: Do you want to do the same? | 14:19 |
| bigjools | I'll try and volunteer for on-call ad-hoc when Soyuz is calmer! | 14:19 |
| gmb | [AGREED] schwuk to look into doing an on-call day next week | 14:19 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: schwuk to look into doing an on-call day next week | 14:19 |
| gmb | [AGREED] bigjools to insert himself in the on-call rota when Soyuz calms down | 14:20 |
| kiko | bigjools, why don't you do half-days? | 14:20 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: bigjools to insert himself in the on-call rota when Soyuz calms down | 14:20 |
| danilos | bigjools: that's going to be... never :) | 14:20 |
| kiko | otherwise this "soyuz calms down" thing never happens | 14:20 |
| bigjools | kiko: on-call is usually half a day anyway I thought | 14:20 |
| kiko | so.. | 14:20 |
| bigjools | next cycle will bne much easier | 14:20 |
| kiko | say yes | 14:20 |
| kiko | doubt that! | 14:20 |
| bigjools | are you not telling me something? :) | 14:20 |
| bigjools | ok, I will join gmb a week Monday | 14:21 |
| kiko | yes, that you have a natural talent for underestimating! :) | 14:21 |
| gmb | bigjools: I'm off then. But barry'll be back | 14:21 |
| bigjools | good point, I'll join barry then | 14:21 |
| gmb | [AGREED] bigjools to do on-call reviews on Mondays from 2008-03-31 | 14:22 |
| MootBot | AGREED received: bigjools to do on-call reviews on Mondays from 2008-03-31 | 14:22 |
| gmb | Anyone got anything to add on this topic? | 14:22 |
| gmb | 5 | 14:22 |
| gmb | 4 | 14:22 |
| gmb | 3 | 14:22 |
| gmb | 2 | 14:22 |
| gmb | 1 | 14:22 |
| gmb | [TOPIC] Review process | 14:22 |
| MootBot | New Topic: Review process | 14:22 |
| gmb | Does anyone have any comments about the review process? Any ideas about how it could be made more efficient? | 14:23 |
| gmb | Well, we'll assume that we're doing it right for the time being, then :) | 14:23 |
| gmb | Okay, that covers it for today's super-short meeting | 14:24 |
| bigjools | one point I'd like to make | 14:24 |
| gmb | Hurrah! | 14:24 |
| bigjools | to see if anyone agrees | 14:24 |
| bigjools | since the PQM queue is so big, is it worth merging multiple branches to speed things up? | 14:24 |
| bigjools | multiple ones that are your own, I mean | 14:24 |
| gmb | bigjools: That screws up the changelog, though, and makes more work for mrevell and Rinchen. | 14:25 |
| bigjools | what about if it's two [!log] jobs? | 14:25 |
| schwuk | bigjools: I've seen intellectronica and cprov do that before | 14:25 |
| Rinchen | !logs are fine to merge together | 14:25 |
| intellectronica | bigjools: how confident are you that they will all pass? also, it's nice to have the entries in the changelog | 14:25 |
| bigjools | I try and do it too, with [!log] stuff | 14:25 |
| sinzui | I think it should be considered and done when it does not mess with the review or the changelog | 14:25 |
| intellectronica | schwuk: only for very trivial branches | 14:25 |
| bigjools | it's down to your discretion, but for really simple [!log] stuff it makes a lot of sense to me | 14:26 |
| schwuk | intellectronica: but you have done it :) | 14:26 |
| gmb | For simple, [!log] stuff, yes, I'd agree it's probably okay. | 14:26 |
| cprov | schwuk: as long as it doesn't mess your commit message, I'd say. | 14:26 |
| Rinchen | So, !logs are ok to merge but if you end up merging two regular items, please consider either updating the PQM subject to reflect both OR, sending mrevell a note with the RF number and the two commit msgs | 14:26 |
| intellectronica | schwuk: i can't deny that, no :) | 14:26 |
| gmb | Rinchen: Do you want to mail the lp@ list about this matter to clarify things? | 14:27 |
| Rinchen | gmb, I'd be happy to. I'll do that now. | 14:27 |
| gmb | Since the queue was he-awge over the weekend. | 14:27 |
| * bigjools is just looking for a way to help with the increased test run time and bigger PQM queues | 14:27 | |
| gmb | [ACTION] Rinchen to mail the list about merging [!log] reviews. | 14:27 |
| MootBot | ACTION received: Rinchen to mail the list about merging [!log] reviews. | 14:27 |
| gmb | Okay. | 14:28 |
| bigjools | coolio, thanks | 14:28 |
| gmb | Does anyone have any other business they'd like to bring up? | 14:28 |
| gmb | 5 | 14:28 |
| gmb | 4 | 14:28 |
| gmb | 3 | 14:28 |
| gmb | 2 | 14:28 |
| gmb | 1 | 14:28 |
| gmb | #endmeeting | 14:28 |
| MootBot | Meeting finished at 15:29. | 14:28 |
| gmb | Thanks folks! | 14:28 |
| bac | thanks graham | 14:28 |
| bigjools | thanks gmb | 14:28 |
| intellectronica | thanks gmb, excellent chairing, if i may | 14:29 |
| gmb | Heh, thanks. | 14:29 |
| schwuk | thanks gmb | 14:30 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
| === kiko is now known as kiko-phone | ||
| === kiko-phone is now known as kiko | ||
| === schwuk_ is now known as schwuk | ||
| === jml` is now known as jml | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!