/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/03/21/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

secretlondonI have done that as a comment but it didn't seem to work00:01
secretlondondescription may be better00:01
bdmurraydescription is right there in front and the first thing you see00:02
bdmurraya comment can get buried by more comments00:02
* secretlondon nods00:07
secretlondonyep00:11
pwnguin 42.5% (258.6)      <kernel IPI> : Rescheduling interrupts05:15
pwnguin=(05:15
pwnguinthats a lot of wakeups05:16
=== FlannelKing is now known as Flannel
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ - http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
qensehello08:50
kagouseb128, hi10:23
kagouseb128, i'v re-open Bug #1477410:23
ubotuLaunchpad bug 14774 in gnome-system-tools "[shares-admin] Shared folders requires a login" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1477410:23
seb128hey kagou10:24
kagou2.21.3-0ubuntu1 seem's to have "- Shares: Handle SMB passwords.10:24
kagou" but last g-s-t don't handle SMB passord10:24
seb128kagou: I hate gst, we should just delete the thing10:24
kagoulose of a patch ?!10:24
seb128dunno10:24
seb128and I honestly don't care, I don't read the bugs for this buggy thing10:25
seb128we should just replace it with nautilus-share10:25
seb128gst is buggy, written in perl, not maintained upstream nor in debian nor in ubuntu10:26
kagouwouah, euh may be we have to disable share-admin ?10:27
seb128why?10:27
kagouand add nautilus-share by default10:27
seb128you think people will complain less?10:27
seb128that was the plan but that's a bit late for hardy now10:27
kagouagain share-admin is unusable as it10:27
kagouso why not simply disable it10:28
seb128so don't use it10:28
kagoudon't show it10:28
seb128you think people will complain less?10:28
seb128would be nice if some user tried to solve the issue10:28
seb128rather than having everybody complaining about it not working as they expect10:28
kagougoogle soc ?10:28
seb128not likely to be done before hardy10:28
pwnguinwhat soc?10:30
pwnguinnot ubuntu's10:30
qensehello10:43
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== QbixAway is now known as Qbix
greg-gbdmurray: sorry I didn't get back to you last night, something came up when I got home.11:52
IulianHey11:58
=== doko_ is now known as doko
bddebianBoo12:52
* Iulian b00s loudly12:56
qenseDoes Microsoft has a public bug tracker? I think bug 154490 is a bug in Vista, instead of grub12:58
ubotuLaunchpad bug 154490 in grub "Vista crashes Linux filesystem when hibernating" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/15449012:58
bddebianIulian: :-)12:58
bddebianVista is one big bug12:59
qenseI know12:59
qensebut this bug screws us up, not just vista12:59
persiaThere's the MS knowledgebase, but it only tracks bugs with fixes available.  I'm not sure it's properly supported by LP, but if there is a KB article, you could add a link.13:00
qensewhere can you find that?13:00
qenseWe could send Microsoft a mail to let them know about this bug13:01
qenseBut I don't expect much of that, since their bootloader also doesn't support other OSes13:01
persiahttp://support.microsoft.com/ (although the interface leaves lots to be desired, and the "support" is limited)13:01
qenseI'll see what I can do13:02
qensewow13:03
qenseyou have to pay for support if I read the description well13:04
qenseI'm not going to pay to give them information about a possible bug13:04
qenseor they require a license13:04
* persia hasn't used MS KB in several years, but remembers there being some search URL that allowed one to view KB articles without paying (although perhaps not submit a new issue)13:05
persiaMaybe you could work with the bug submitter to pass upstream?  They likely have a license.13:05
qensethat will start their 90 days of free support period13:06
qenseafter that they have to pay13:06
persiaAh.  That's not ideal then.  Oh well.  Some upstreams are too troublesome to bother helping :(13:06
qenseI think it's ridiculous that you should pay in order to give them information about a possible bug13:06
qenseI'll try the feedback option13:07
qensewhy can't they make a clear site?13:07
qenseI've found one KB article containing the word grub!13:08
qensebut it's a possible problem you can have when you use 'A third party boot loader'13:09
qensewhich is strongly not-recommended by MS13:09
qenseand I think, not supported too13:09
qenseargh, I hate MS13:10
qenseMS also requires their own bootloader in order to hibernate vista13:10
=== kostkon__ is now known as kostkon
qenseisn't bug 204652 expected behaviour?14:35
ubotuLaunchpad bug 204652 in gtk+2.0 "gtk_key_theme Emacs mode shade most Gnome Accelerators" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20465214:35
persiaqense: I'd say "Yes".  Emacs uses very different keystrokes.  On the other hand, it may be that either gtk_key_theme Emacs is incomplete or that the user needs to learn the keybinding to access the menus.  The bug may be valid, and poorly entitled.14:37
qenseok, thx14:42
=== Spec[x] is now known as Spec
steph_I would like to report a *bug* for the first time. I thought I have to use launchpad, but I gives me this message: "UbuntuStudio Artwork does not use Launchpad as its bug tracker". Where do I have to report the bug?18:20
james_wsteph_: hi. What is the bug you would like to report?18:20
steph_There is something wrong with the text box for password/username in ubuntustudio-gdm-package 0.24. When you translate gdm, the textbox is on top of the label.18:22
steph_*the artwork with jar/paintbrushes18:22
steph_it needs to be move 3-4 caracters to the right.18:23
james_wI think you need to report it here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/+filebug18:23
steph_I fixed the bug18:23
james_wgreat!18:23
steph_thanks18:23
james_wcan you tell me where you tried to report it before?18:24
james_wit would be interesting to know what led you there instead.18:24
james_wwas it https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-artwork/+filebug ?18:25
james_wthat would seem to be an outdated page.18:25
steph_yes18:30
james_wsteph_: ok, thanks.18:31
steph_Do I have to include my changes in the description, or it's another step?18:32
steph_*steph_ never did that before18:32
james_wsteph_: yes, you can include everything in the description if you like.18:33
steph_so I open a bug, give its description, add my fixes, and notify for a "bug fixed"?18:34
james_wsteph_: if you leave it as New then someone can find your fixes and apply them.18:35
steph_ok.thanks18:35
james_wIt needs to get in to the official package before it can be regarded as fixed.18:35
steph_james_w: cooool. It's a pretty good feeling to have an influence (as small as it can be)!18:51
steph_it makes my day :)18:51
=== dodger_ is now known as Hurtz
=== secretlondo is now known as secretlondon
james_wsteph_: it's great isn't it :)19:09
james_wsteph_: thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better.19:09
=== blue-frog_ is now known as blue-frog
greg-gquiet day20:28
=== secretlondo is now known as secretlondon
=== Spec is now known as x-spec-t
=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF
Bruno1i have a question. After i upload a .debdiff to a bug report, do i change its status?22:34
yuriyBruno1: you could keep it "Triaged" or change to "In Progress". make sure to check off that the attachment is a patch22:54
Bruno1yuriy: ok22:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!