xhaker | doko: found a bug | 18:27 |
---|---|---|
xhaker | xhaker@xps:~$ grep browser_dirs= /var/lib/dpkg/info/icedtea-gcjwebplugin.postinst | 18:27 |
xhaker | browser_dirs="firefox iceape iceweasel mozilla midbrowser xulrunner" | 18:27 |
xhaker | doko: after a no change rebuild of the source packages unchanged it's fixed | 18:44 |
xhaker | doko xhaker@xps:~$ grep browser_dirs= /var/lib/dpkg/info/icedtea-gcjwebplugin.postinst | 18:44 |
xhaker | browser_dirs="xulrunner-addons" | 18:44 |
xhaker | could the buildd daemons be claiming to be Debian machines? :D | 18:45 |
xhaker | buildd servers* | 18:45 |
mohbana | why dont you guys just get help from fedora they do a perject job at making sure icedtea is running | 18:45 |
xhaker | mohbana: in relation to what i'm saying, that has no value, since the packaging is correct, the builders just messed up | 18:46 |
xhaker | mohbana: but you might not be talking about what i was entering above. in that case speak.. | 18:47 |
xhaker | mohbana: you're a ubuntu user wishing it had more java support? | 18:47 |
mohbana | just generally speaking, icedtea is not working, eclipse is outdated in repos. xhaker i use fedora the vast majority of the time but i have ubuntu on the | 18:48 |
mohbana | another partion just incase and mainly to play about aswell | 18:48 |
xhaker | mohbana: you're using what version on that partition? testing hardy? | 18:49 |
mohbana | i am using gusty | 18:49 |
doko | mohbana: we are removing the icedtea-java7 packages; no need to fix these for hardy | 18:49 |
mohbana | so what is going to happen? | 18:50 |
mohbana | just sun? | 18:50 |
doko | mohbana: please send your eclipse packaging fixes to me, or file bug reports with the fixes attached | 18:50 |
mohbana | why do you guys just get help from fedora there doing a really good job. doko sorry i dont quiet understand what your talking about | 18:51 |
xhaker | mohbana: hardy has openjdk-6 proper now | 18:51 |
mohbana | xhaker, ok thats nice to hear ... is the mozzila plugin working/ | 18:51 |
xhaker | mohbana: that's what i was talking about with doko earlier | 18:51 |
doko | mohbana: you're welcome to prepare an openjdk-6 backport for gutsy | 18:52 |
xhaker | mohbana: it is not working yet with firefox3 due to a bug in the builder maybe | 18:52 |
xhaker | doko: i believe mohbana is not a developer, and is dissatisfied because fedora has better java, etc. | 18:53 |
doko | xhaker: then mohbana should at least file bug reports about issues which he discovers | 18:54 |
mohbana | xhaker, no i am a uni student but yes thats very true | 18:54 |
mohbana | ok | 18:55 |
xhaker | doko: will you have a look at the icedtea-gcjwebplugin issue, just built the package in pbuilder and the binaries were very different | 18:55 |
mohbana | any news on eclipse 3.3 on repo for hardy/ | 18:55 |
xhaker | sorry for not filling the bug myself, was trying to understand what as wrong with the scripts but couldn't finf anything of course :D | 18:56 |
xhaker | mohbana: eclipse 3.3 is not in hardy, and won't be unless it gets backported from the next version | 18:56 |
xhaker | you can however use the latest version of netbeans in hardy | 18:56 |
xhaker | with openjdk-6 :) | 18:57 |
xhaker | i would like to see eclipse in the repositories too, but it won't happen in hardy | 18:58 |
doko | xhaker, mohbana: fixed icedtea-gcjwebplugin uploaded, should be available within two hours | 18:59 |
mohbana | what about after the release, is it likely that its going to appear in the repo? | 19:00 |
doko | mohbana: it's not that easy to package eclipse, if there are no volunteers to do the packaging, then there won't be a package | 19:00 |
xhaker | mohbana: since you have ubuntu on a seperate partition and you seem eager to try new stuff, install the hardy beta available at the site, and file any bugs you find | 19:00 |
xhaker | doko: it's not easy indeed, could upstream easy the burden in any way in the future? | 19:00 |
xhaker | doko: i'm asking because i've tried before to package 3.3 | 19:01 |
doko | there's a ML about eclipse in unix distributions | 19:02 |
xhaker | i might try again, since i haven't heard from the guy that clearly stated he was working on it, and it seems he wasn't | 19:02 |
xhaker | doko: that was tricky. why would my pbuilder not need lsb-release? short answer welcome | 19:05 |
doko | look at the build log | 19:06 |
doko | maybe lsb-release is installed in your chroot? | 19:06 |
xhaker | maybe, i'm using gdebi for the dependencies resolution, it might be pulling lsb-release :) | 19:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!