[18:27] <xhaker> doko: found a bug
[18:27] <xhaker> xhaker@xps:~$ grep browser_dirs= /var/lib/dpkg/info/icedtea-gcjwebplugin.postinst
[18:27] <xhaker> browser_dirs="firefox iceape iceweasel mozilla midbrowser xulrunner"
[18:44] <xhaker> doko: after a no change rebuild of the source packages unchanged it's fixed
[18:44] <xhaker> doko xhaker@xps:~$ grep browser_dirs= /var/lib/dpkg/info/icedtea-gcjwebplugin.postinst
[18:44] <xhaker> browser_dirs="xulrunner-addons"
[18:45] <xhaker> could the buildd daemons be claiming to be Debian machines? :D
[18:45] <xhaker> buildd servers*
[18:45] <mohbana> why dont you guys just get help from fedora they do a perject job at making sure icedtea is running
[18:46] <xhaker> mohbana: in relation to what i'm saying, that has no value, since the packaging is correct, the builders just messed up
[18:47] <xhaker> mohbana: but you might not be talking about what i was entering above. in that case speak..
[18:47] <xhaker> mohbana: you're a ubuntu user wishing it had more java support?
[18:48] <mohbana> just generally speaking, icedtea is not working, eclipse is outdated in repos.  xhaker i use fedora the vast majority of the time but i have ubuntu on the
[18:48] <mohbana> another partion just incase and mainly to play about aswell
[18:49] <xhaker> mohbana: you're using what version on that partition? testing hardy?
[18:49] <mohbana> i am using gusty
[18:49] <doko> mohbana: we are removing the icedtea-java7 packages; no need to fix these for hardy
[18:50] <mohbana> so what is going to happen?
[18:50] <mohbana> just sun?
[18:50] <doko> mohbana: please send your eclipse packaging fixes to me, or file bug reports with the fixes attached
[18:51] <mohbana> why do you guys just get help from fedora there doing a really good job.  doko sorry i dont quiet understand what your talking about
[18:51] <xhaker> mohbana: hardy has openjdk-6 proper now
[18:51] <mohbana> xhaker, ok thats nice to hear ... is the mozzila plugin working/
[18:51] <xhaker> mohbana: that's what i was talking about with doko earlier
[18:52] <doko> mohbana: you're welcome to prepare an openjdk-6 backport for gutsy
[18:52] <xhaker> mohbana: it is not working yet with firefox3 due to a bug in the builder maybe
[18:53] <xhaker> doko: i believe mohbana is not a developer, and is dissatisfied because fedora has better java, etc.
[18:54] <doko> xhaker: then mohbana should at least file bug reports about issues which he discovers
[18:54] <mohbana> xhaker, no i am a uni student but yes thats very true
[18:55] <mohbana> ok
[18:55] <xhaker> doko: will you have a look at the icedtea-gcjwebplugin issue, just built the package in pbuilder and the binaries were very different
[18:55] <mohbana> any news on eclipse 3.3 on repo for hardy/
[18:56] <xhaker> sorry for not filling the bug myself, was trying to understand what as wrong with the scripts but couldn't finf anything of course :D
[18:56] <xhaker> mohbana: eclipse 3.3 is not in hardy, and won't be unless it gets backported from the next version
[18:56] <xhaker> you can however use the latest version of netbeans in hardy
[18:57] <xhaker> with openjdk-6 :)
[18:58] <xhaker> i would like to see eclipse in the repositories too, but it won't happen in hardy
[18:59] <doko> xhaker, mohbana: fixed icedtea-gcjwebplugin uploaded, should be available within two hours
[19:00] <mohbana> what about after the release, is it likely that its going to appear in the repo?
[19:00] <doko> mohbana: it's not that easy to package eclipse, if there are no volunteers to do the packaging, then there won't be a package
[19:00] <xhaker> mohbana: since you have ubuntu on a seperate partition and you seem eager to try new stuff, install the hardy beta available at the site, and file any bugs you find
[19:00] <xhaker> doko: it's not easy indeed, could upstream easy the burden in any way in the future?
[19:01] <xhaker> doko: i'm asking because i've tried before to package 3.3
[19:02] <doko> there's a ML about eclipse in unix distributions
[19:02] <xhaker> i might try again, since i haven't heard from the guy that clearly stated he was working on it, and it seems he wasn't
[19:05] <xhaker> doko: that was tricky. why would my pbuilder not need lsb-release? short answer welcome
[19:06] <doko> look at the build log
[19:06] <doko> maybe lsb-release is installed in your chroot?
[19:13] <xhaker> maybe, i'm using gdebi for the dependencies resolution, it might be pulling lsb-release :)