[00:01] <fta> [reed], P2 + tm=mozilla1.9 ?
[00:01] <[reed]> correct
[00:02] <[reed]> that means it's a final blocker
[00:02] <[reed]> but not a b5 blocker
[00:02] <fta> done
[00:06] <[reed]> cool
[00:16] <Jazzva> Evening everyone...
[00:16] <Jazzva> asac, are you there?
[00:37] <asac> Jazzva: a bit
[00:38] <Jazzva> I needed to update a few paths... Where are the new addons installed, /usr/lib/firefox-addons?
[00:39] <Jazzva> There are three other in /usr/lib: firefox, firefox-3.0, firefox-3.0b5pre
[00:39] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/
[00:39] <Jazzva> That's the one :)...
[00:40] <asac> if that extension is compatible to midbrowser you can also dump it in the xulrunner-addons/extensions directory
[00:40] <Jazzva> midbrowser? I'll check that...
[00:41] <Jazzva> Can I just update the old rules file, or should I use the template you made?
[00:41] <Jazzva> 'cause it works well with the old one...
[00:44] <Jazzva> Anyway... that should be it... Now I should just update get-orig-source part in rules file (switched to svn), upload to launchpad and file a bug...
[00:48] <fta> we would like to have all extensions using xpi.mk for consistency
[00:49] <Jazzva> Ok :)... I'll change it...
[01:04] <asac> well ... if it means that we can get more new extensions packaged, we can also keep the old package for already packaged extensions now
[01:05] <asac> but xpi.mk is indeed preferred
[01:06] <Jazzva> Hmm... I can't test it in midbrowser... midbrowser isn't supposed to run on Ubuntu desktop, right?
[01:06] <asac> you can access the menu by presing f4 if thats what you mean
[01:07] <asac> but midbrowser in our archive is really old
[01:07] <asac> so don't test it now
[01:07] <asac> just use firefox-addons
[01:07] <Jazzva> Nope, it won't run at all...
[01:08] <Jazzva> Maybe it clashes with newer version of some other package (lucky guess...)
[01:09] <asac> strange
[01:09] <asac> nss?
[01:10] <Jazzva> x window system error
[01:10] <Jazzva> The error was 'BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)'.
[01:10] <Jazzva>   (Details: serial 898 error_code 10 request_code 2 minor_code 0)
[01:10] <Jazzva> if it's of any help...
[01:14] <asac> ok ... most likely haven't seen a respin recently :)
[07:57] <[reed]> asac: ping
[08:23] <[reed]> asac: three things: 1) need a= in mozilla bug 417086, 2) reply to my comment in mozilla bug 407720; 3) follow-up to roc's comment in mozilla bug 394103
[08:23] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 417086 in General "Use of colon (:) in hash/anchor part of chrome URL when using window.open results in an error." [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417086
[08:23] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 407720 in JavaScript Engine "js_FindClassObject causes crashes with getter/setter" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407720
[08:24] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 394103 in GFX: Thebes "All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103
[10:41] <Festor> HI
[10:42] <Festor> Does anyone know why the command update-mozilla-firefox-chrome is not available in beta 4 of firefox 3 in beta of Ubuntu 8.04?
[10:46] <Festor> I am trying to do this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/204719
[10:46] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 204719 in firefox "Firefox 3 language packs missing" [Undecided,In progress]
[10:58] <Festor> Is there anyone ...?
[11:07] <Festor> Does anyone know why the command update-mozilla-firefox-chrome is not available in beta 4 of firefox 3 in beta of Ubuntu 8.04?
[11:07] <Festor> I am trying to do this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/204719
[11:08] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 204719 in firefox "Firefox 3 language packs missing" [Undecided,In progress]
[12:38] <asac> mozilla bug 394103
[12:38] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 394103 in GFX: Thebes "All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103
[13:00] <asac> [reed]: approved
[13:05] <asac> [reed]: replied 1
[13:19] <asac> replied 2
[14:29] <Jazzva> Hmm... I'm having problems with xpi.mk... I uncommented the MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND line in debian/rules, but it skips running it before pacaging xpi... any ideas?
[14:36] <asac> Jazzva: log?
[14:36] <Jazzva> asac: Just a sec...
[14:36] <asac> Jazzva: you need to use the binary package name ... not the source one :)
[14:37] <Jazzva> mhm... that may be the reason
[14:37] <Jazzva> :)
[14:38] <Jazzva> works alright :)
[14:38] <asac> good
[16:04] <Jazzva> Should I leave the old maintainer in debian/control?
[16:18] <Jazzva> I have to go for a few hours... The firefox-greasemonkey is uploaded to bzr <https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/firefox-extensions/firefox-greasemonkey.ubuntu>,  and I opened a bug 205172. I'm only uncertain about Maintainer field in debian/control, which is why I didn't subscribe mozillateam to the bug report yet. See you later...
[16:18] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 205172 in greasemonkey "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firefox-greasemonkey" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205172
[16:25] <armin76> hrm....how you guys do a xul-only firefox tarball?
[17:01] <armin76> ah, i see
[17:52] <armin76> eh...
[17:52] <armin76> xulrunner doesn't use jemalloc :D
[17:53] <armin76> fta_: asac: ^
[17:53] <armin76> it isn't linked against it
[17:53] <armin76> ff isn't either unless its compiled without xul
[17:55] <armin76> ifdef MOZ_MEMORY
[17:55] <armin76> ifeq ($(OS_ARCH),Darwin)
[17:55] <armin76> LIBS += -ljemalloc
[17:56] <armin76> wtf? only for macos?
[18:02] <armin76> ah...reed removed it due to bug 418016
[18:02] <armin76> mozilla bug 418016
[18:02] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 418016 in XPCOM "Ts jumped ~1% when enabling jemalloc on Linux (qm-mini-ubuntu01, qm-mini-ubuntu02, qm-mini-ubuntu05)" [Minor,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418016
[19:50] <asac> armin76: its statically linked into libxul atm
[21:49] <[reed]> asac: ping
[21:53] <asac> [reed]: ?
[21:55] <[reed]> I'm somehow subscribed to lp bug 199496... when I click Unsubscribe and select "Unsubscribe me from this bug", I get "Not allowed here  Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page.  You are logged in as Reed Loden."
[21:55] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199496 in gtk-sharp2 "Tomboy.exe crashed with SIGSEGV in exit()" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199496
[21:55] <[reed]> I'm getting tired of getting e-mails
[21:55] <[reed]> from this bug's duplicates
[21:55] <[reed]> how can I unsubscribe myself?
[21:55] <[reed]> mozilla bug 407720 needs your a=
[21:55] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 407720 in JavaScript Engine "js_FindClassObject causes crashes with getter/setter" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407720
[21:56] <asac> [reed]: hmm ... maybe a launchpad bug?
[21:57] <asac> do you know which bug you initially reported?
[21:57] <[reed]> it's very annoying!
[21:57] <asac> i guess you have been subscribed by a duplicate
[21:58] <asac> so maybe it helps to unsubscribe from the dupe first
[21:59] <[reed]> ok, I just found it
[21:59] <[reed]> lp bug 202742
[21:59] <ubotu> Bug 202742 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/202742 is private
[21:59] <[reed]> that's what I reported, so I just unsubscribed myself
[21:59] <asac> maybe thats the reason
[22:00] <[reed]> but lp is very lame in that it won't let you see the bug again
[22:00] <[reed]> if you unsubscribe yourself
[22:00] <[reed]> that's very lame
[22:00] <armin76> haha
[22:01] <asac> [reed]: you couldn't see it in bugzilla too or?
[22:02] <[reed]> if you report a bug, you will always be able to see it
[22:02] <[reed]> since it's your bug
[22:02] <[reed]> even if it's marked security
[22:02] <asac> i opened it up after removing your core
[22:03] <asac> [reed]: right ... but this means that the reporter has a special subscription .. e.g. you cannot unsubscribe
[22:03] <asac> but i see your point
[22:03] <[reed]> you should be able to unsubscribe from the bugmail but still be able to see the bug at all times
[22:04] <Jazzva> asac, sorry to interrupt. Just a quick one :). There is an old (Debian, I suppose) maintainer in debian/control for greasemonkey. Should I put him as original-maintainer, and add someone else as maintainer? Whom should I add? Ubuntu MOTU?
[22:05] <asac> Jazzva: if we don't base the new package on his, we can use MOTU, yes.
[22:07] <Jazzva> Well, I suppose we don't. The packaging is done with XPI.TEMPLATE, the parts taken from his package are description in debian/control, debian/copyright, and debian/changelog (updated for recent changes).
[22:08] <[reed]> asac: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&keywords_type=nowords&keywords=fixed1.8.0.15%2C+verified1.8.0.15&chfieldto=Now&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=approval1.8.0.15%2B
[22:08] <[reed]> does that query return anything for you?
[22:10] <asac> [reed]: no
[22:10] <asac> what are you looking for?
[22:10] <[reed]> that query is approved 1.8.0 bugs that haven't landed yet
[22:10] <asac> o ... everything that has landed
[22:10] <[reed]> yes
[22:10] <asac> my remembered quesry is zero too
[22:10] <asac> COOL!
[22:11] <asac> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=nowords&keywords=fixed1.8.0.15+verified1.8.0.15&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&c
[22:11] <asac> those are the blocking bugs not yet fixed or verified
[22:12] <asac> 26 for me ... but loads of sec-sensitive
[22:13] <[reed]> http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=MOZILLA_1_8_0_BRANCH&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=month&mindate=&maxdate=&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
[22:13] <[reed]> that's the last month of commits for 1.8.0 branch
[22:15] <asac> can we land 33 more till tomorrow :)
[22:15] <asac> then we could bake the 2.0.0.13 release from that branch
[22:15] <asac> just kidding