[00:17] <asac> Jazzva: we could also ask debia to use mozilla-devscripts :)
[00:17] <asac> but maybe not now ;)
[00:18] <Jazzva> asac: I was wondering if we're planning to send the extensions to Debian :)... BTW, aren't you in Debian?
[00:18] <asac> yes i am :)
[00:19] <asac> but my packages are severly neglected atm
[00:19] <Jazzva> So, you would basically ask yourself and few other people :)?
[00:19] <Jazzva> Oh... damn.
[00:19] <asac> only thing i am getting done is doing security support - which should be good enough
[00:19] <asac> Jazzva: no, in debian you have to ask the package maintainer
[00:19] <asac> i can upload mozilla-devscripts, yes.
[00:20] <Jazzva> I see... Well, would it be easier for new extensions that aren't in Debian?
[00:20] <asac> yes
[00:20] <asac> i could upload those
[00:21] <Jazzva> Well, that's good then :)...
[00:22] <Jazzva> Anyway, I'm done with greasemonkey. I'm currently beginning work on bettergmail2... talking with it's developer, there are some missing licensing information. I need to contact the script developers, so it will take a while (I suppose). I'll find some other to work on...
[00:23] <asac> is greasemonkey in bzr now?
[00:23] <Jazzva> yep. I subscribed mozillateam to the bug 205172
[00:23] <asac> ah i see the branches
[00:23] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 205172 in greasemonkey "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firefox-greasemonkey" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205172
[00:25] <Jazzva> I suppose I should add myself as the Ubuntu QA contact on the FF3 extensions wiki page, right?
[00:25] <asac> yes, pleaes.
[00:26] <Jazzva> Ok...
[00:27] <asac> Jazzva: maybe check if ther eare other packaged extensions not yet available in ffox 3
[00:27] <asac> i saw that some had been upgraded
[00:27] <asac> but not all (like greasemonkey)
[00:28] <Jazzva> Ok... I'll take a look
[01:47] <[reed]> what does mean when you "join a team" on lp?
[01:50] <Jazzva> You get some permissions which are available to the team members... One would be upload to team's bzr branches. You can moderate the bug reports related to that team's area... (that's all I can think of right now)
[01:50] <Jazzva> [reed] ^
[01:50] <[reed]> mm, k
[01:50] <Jazzva> And I'm pretty sure there's more to it :)
[11:59] <leroutier> hello
[12:19] <leroutier> could asac or someone else ACK/REJ bug #202468 please ?
[12:19] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 202468 in ubuntu "FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202468
[12:19] <leroutier> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/202468
[12:19] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 202468 in ubuntu "FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6" [Undecided,New]
[18:31] <louise> Good evening - has anyone seen any recent documentation on Thunderbird Webmail not working ... due to server problems.
[18:46] <asac> thunderbird webmail? whats that?
[19:18] <Jazzva> Maybe he/she thought of this: http://webmail.mozdev.org/
[20:28] <asac> ah
=== fta_ is now known as NextHop
=== NextHop is now known as fta
=== fta is now known as NextHop
[21:12] <asac> [reed]: really cool. everything except 2 patches from the current distro patchset were already applied
[21:12] <asac> thanks a lot for your support
[21:13] <[reed]> :)
[21:15] <asac> ok ... i think i am finished with 2.0.0.13 backports
[21:15] <asac> a bit late though
[21:15] <asac> i lack feedback from igor, but i think the bugs are not 1.8.0 that i am not sure about