[04:11] <ubotu> In ubotu, vocx said: case is Everything in Unix and Linux is case sensitive
[07:08] <MTecknology> anybody around?
[07:09] <MTecknology> I don't know where to report it, but could somebody maybe take a look at http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatIsubuntu/releases ? I get the message "You are not authorized to access this page."
[07:12] <Hobbsee> (dealt with)
[07:34] <Myrtti> logs?
[07:37] <Hobbsee> hm?
[07:43] <Myrtti> nothing
[08:30] <Tm_T> laa
[08:36] <jussio1> dee
[09:54] <Hobbsee> vistakiller...known?
[09:56] <Tm_T> yes
[09:56] <Hobbsee> good?  bad?
[10:30] <Tm_T> Hobbsee: both :))
[10:30] <Tm_T> quite ok what I've seen
[10:30] <Tm_T> Hobbsee: what's about?
[11:06] <Myrtti> hello noober, how can we help you today
[11:08] <elkbuntu> noober, this isnt a channel for chatting or idling, so please state your issue
[11:57] <jussio1> hello LjL-Temp
[11:57] <LjL-Temp> hi
[13:36] <Soms> Any ops around?
[13:36] <LjL-Temp> yes
[13:36] <LjL-Temp> how can i help you?
[13:36] <Soms> Mind unbanning neopsyche so he could apologise?
[13:36] <Soms> He'd like to apologise for his behavior.
[13:36] <Soms> Not too bad, how is your easter?
[13:37] <LjL-Temp> i can unban him from here, yes, but i'll warn that apologies won't necessarily help very much
[13:37] <Soms> I understand.
[13:37] <Hobbsee> oh, there you go
[13:38] <neopsyche>  I just rememberd that IRC here is logged. I fear my entire image on here and possibly in general has been tarnished now because of comments I made out of frustration .. I have learned my lesson but feel my attitude even though not all that bad has completely ruined things as nobody will help me and I am permanently banned it seems.
[13:39]  * Soms waves
[13:39] <Soms> Happy Easter all.
[13:39] <neopsyche> I dont even want to use this nick anymore.
[13:39] <LjL-Temp> neopsyche: few bans are permanent
[13:39] <neopsyche> I am going to read the rules now.
[13:39] <neopsyche> I feel sick about this entire situation.
[13:40] <neopsyche> The Ubuntu community is a good thing to be involved in and I dont want to be excluded from that.
[13:40] <LjL-Temp> neopsyche, reading the rules is certainly a good start
[13:41] <neopsyche> I have even tried phoning dennis kaarsemaker to apologise.
[13:41] <neopsyche> diddnt get through.
[13:41] <Seveas> neopsyche, my phine is switched off and I definitely don't appreciate unsollicted phonecalls
[13:42] <neopsyche> apologies for that too then.
[13:42] <neopsyche> I dont know what else to say.
[13:43] <Seveas> also be glad it's easter and I'm in a good mood. I demolished some old furniture from my mother in law. I've unbanned you but please behave
[13:46] <neopsyche> Thank you, hope you enjoy the rest of your day.  This entire experience has been very humbling.
[14:03] <elkbuntu> is rayb0t a bot?
[14:04] <elkbuntu> er, rayb0t_
[14:28] <pleia2> -!- emma [n=emma@unaffiliated/emma] has left #ubuntu-women ["Check out ##club-ubuntu"]
[14:29] <pleia2> appears she's now choosing to spam in /part messages (ugh)
[14:29] <Hobbsee> pleia2: another piece of spam.  Thanks for reporting it.
[14:29] <elkbuntu> thanks pleia2
[14:29] <pleia2> np
[14:29] <Hobbsee> so, uh, how long will we let her continue to get away with it for?
[14:31] <elkbuntu> i wonder why she only quit there?
[14:39] <Hobbsee> unsure.
[14:39] <Hobbsee> either way, i'm getting really sick of her spamming, and consistently wanting not to change.
[14:40] <elkbuntu> or, constantly wanting us to change how we would and do treat anyone else doing the same thing
[16:33] <MrUnagi> i was just wondering if i am still banned from #kubuntu or if i wasnt banned from there on this connection......i would rather not be accused of ban evading again
[16:50] <fdoving> MrUnagi: your ban matches the .comcast.net connection. not your current one.
[16:52] <MrUnagi> does that mean that i should leave until my ban is lifted on my other connections?
[16:53] <fdoving> i don't think bans are automatically lifted. so that could take a while :)
[16:53] <MrUnagi> i notice that i am still banned in the other channels which is why i was wondering
[16:53] <fdoving> what did you do? 
[16:54] <MrUnagi> i was accused of ban evading which wasnt true and when i tried to explain i was laughed at and banned from here........so i was irate and flamed in each channel until i got my point across
[16:55] <Myrtti> until you got your point across... irate, flamed, unsolicited pm
[16:55] <MrUnagi> im not denying any wrong doing i did after i was wronged myself
[16:55] <MrUnagi> and i never did
[16:57] <fdoving> anyway i don't think it's up to every irc user to check if there are any bans matching their current host at any given time.
[16:57] <fdoving> behaving and not be banned is what users should do. :)
[16:57] <MrUnagi> im just making sure that if i stay in kubuntu, that i am not accused of ban evading as i was before
[16:58] <MrUnagi> i would love to  not be banned........i came in here as requested to ask for my initial ban to bbe lifted when i was accused of ban evading
[16:58] <fdoving> asking for anything in this channel usually is pointless.
[16:58] <MrUnagi> i was told to come back after 2 days to request a ban lift
[17:09] <jrib> immediate ban on the rickroll wasn't too much was it?
[17:18] <Seveas> neh
[17:18] <ikonia> is he a known issue ?
[17:18] <ikonia> I've never seen the nick
[17:19] <nikrud> usually known as unagi if it's the same guy
[17:20] <ikonia> ahhhh
[17:20] <ikonia> in that case jrib "no"
[17:20] <Seveas> I've just been rickrolled as well
[17:20] <Seveas> mtv-like channel in NL just aired the video as a part of a "90's top 25" :)
[17:22]  * nikrud is culturally deprived: Had never heard of Rick Astley till now
[17:22] <Seveas> tsss
[17:23] <ikonia> nikrud: where are you based ?
[17:23] <nikrud> los angeles
[17:23] <ikonia> ahhh yes, Rick never made it out of uk
[17:24] <nikrud> recently; lived up and down the west coast, all the major cities at one time or the other
[17:24] <Seveas> he made it to mainland europe
[17:24] <ikonia> Seveas: no way 
[17:24] <Seveas> way
[17:24] <ikonia> Seveas: I thought we banned him with shame
[17:25] <Seveas> I got chiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiils
[17:25] <Seveas> they're multiplying
[17:25]  * nikrud goes off to get edumacated
[17:25]  * Seveas ♥ 90's music :)
[17:26] <nikrud> hm, firefox is freezing the youtube video. Maybe it knows something I don't?
[17:27] <ikonia> it's protecting you
[17:29] <MrUnagi> so when exactly were my bans to be lifted?
[17:31] <nikrud> MrUnagi you need to talk to the person who actually banned you.
[17:31] <MrUnagi> lol if it wasnt ljl im not to incredibly sure who it was.........and if it was the same person on each connection
[17:34] <nalioth> MrUnagi: after this: 1206291260 11:54 < MrUnagi> i was accused of ban evading which wasnt true and when i tried to explain i was laughed at and banned from here........so i was irate and flamed in each channel until i got my point across                 I suspect it'll be awhile
[17:34] <MrUnagi> why?
[17:34] <MrUnagi> thats exactly what happened...
[17:35] <MrUnagi> did i say something wrong?
[17:35] <nalioth> two wrongs don't make one right
[17:35] <MrUnagi> i never said i was right...
[17:37] <MrUnagi> who do i find out who to inquire about a ban lift
[17:38] <MrUnagi> er how rather
[17:42] <nalioth> as was mentioned, the banning op will have to figure it out
[17:43] <MrUnagi> do you know who banned me on each connection?
[17:43] <Myrtti> you do realize that you should've come here to ask your ban lifted BEFORE going to the channels you were banned from and THEN come to make sure it's not treated as ban evading
[17:43] <MrUnagi> i did
[17:43] <MrUnagi> that is when i was laughed at
[17:44] <MrUnagi> and then banned from here
[17:44] <Myrtti> since it, to be totally honest, is probably what it's going to be interpreted as
[17:44] <MrUnagi> i came in here very nice and respectful accepting that i went against coc and  have learned that microsoft discussions are against o4o and asked if my ban may be lifted, i was then accused of ban evading
[17:45] <Myrtti> and ban evading usually prolongs the original ban
[17:45] <Myrtti> and causes the evading host to be also banned
[17:45] <MrUnagi> which is understandable if i actually ban evaded....
[17:46] <Myrtti> your words, not mine
[17:46] <MrUnagi> i said i was accused of ban evading........i never said that i did because i didnt
[17:50] <Myrtti> but you're on #kubuntu now?
[17:50] <MrUnagi> which is what brought me here with my initial question that is still unanswered
[17:51] <Myrtti> as I said, it's probably going to be interpreted as ban evading
[17:51] <Myrtti> I sure would
[17:51] <MrUnagi> what exactly is 'ban evading'
[17:52] <MrUnagi> since i am obviously confused
[17:52] <Myrtti> you know you're not allowed to go into a channel, and do so anyway, using another connection, nick, whatnot.
[17:53] <MrUnagi> konversation is set and has always set and will always be set to automatically go to my usual channels
[17:55] <Myrtti> what I'd suggest you should do now is to, as a sign of good will, leave #kubuntu and the other channels you're not supposed to be on, and wait for the op who banned you to come online and answer your questions
[17:56] <MrUnagi> i left the channel already, and again.......i do not know who banned me on each connection
[17:56] <Myrtti> well, who banned you the first time?
[17:56] <Myrtti> the original connection
[17:56] <MrUnagi> ljl
[17:57] <Myrtti> then I think it's up to him to make a decision
[17:57] <MrUnagi> so its soley his decision?
[17:57] <Myrtti> well not entirely
[17:58] <MrUnagi> thats good........because in all of this he violated the code of conduct as well
[17:58] <Myrtti> I know I'm not making any decisions since I don't know everything
[17:58] <MrUnagi> so id rather an op that can follow coc be the one to make decisions
[17:59] <Myrtti> that's a strong accusation there
[17:59] <Myrtti> I wouldn't go tossing it around that lightly
[17:59] <MrUnagi> he knows he did because he appologized
[19:47] <theunixgeek_> For some reason I can't join #ubuntu-fr.
[19:47] <theunixgeek_> Am I blocked or something?
[19:50] <nalioth> theunixgeek_: almost the right channel
[19:50] <nalioth>  #ubuntu-irc svp
[20:06] <ikonia> LjL-Temp: your a wanted man
[20:06] <LjL-Temp> ikonia: i'm afraid i know
[20:06] <ikonia> ha ha
[20:06] <ikonia> unlucky
[20:07]  * jussio1 hugs LjL-Temp
[20:09] <ikonia> LjL-Temp: got a moment for a pm ?
[20:09] <LjL-Temp> let me check my agenda
[20:09] <LjL-Temp> yes, i think so
[20:10] <ikonia> ta
[20:12] <Tm_T> hi kids
[20:13] <jussio1> hei isi :)
[20:13] <Myrtti> :->
[20:16] <ubotu> zwnj called the ops in #ubuntu-ir ()
[20:19] <ubotu> ebrahim called the ops in #ubuntu-ir ()
[20:20] <nalioth> they've got their own bot, which responds to ( guess what ) !commands
[20:21] <LjL-Temp> which one should be kept? theirs, i assume
[20:21] <nalioth> yep
[20:24] <mohi> LjL-Temp: when would you send ubotu back to #ubuntu-ir ?
[20:25] <LjL-Temp> eh?
[20:25] <LjL-Temp> make up your mind
[20:25] <nalioth> mohi: i've answered that question in #ubuntu-ir
[20:25] <mohi> nalioth: aha! ty ;)
[20:29] <mohi> LjL-Temp: we solves the problem. please bring ubotu back :) 
[20:29] <mohi> nalioth: ^
[20:29] <mohi> solved*
[20:29] <mohi> tanx :)
[20:38] <mohi> does ubotu supports "seen" ?
[20:38] <Pici> no.
[20:38] <Pici> /msg seenserv help    <-
[20:38] <mohi> aha! ty  Pici :)
[21:01] <ubotu> In #ubuntu-ir, Siavash said: !forget test
[21:12] <ompaul> Seveas, <ebrahim> ompaul, can you remove @ sensitivity of ubotu for #ubuntu-ir? 
[21:12] <ompaul> can that be done?
[21:12] <ompaul> that ubotu will not react to @ in that channel?
[21:12] <Seveas> no
[21:12] <ompaul> thought as much but had to ask
[21:12] <ompaul> thanks
[21:23] <ikonia> hey hey ompaul 
[21:23] <ompaul> thats me
[22:40] <ubotu> In #kubuntu-devel, travlr said: ubotu: thanks. is it up to date for KDE4 though?
[22:40] <LjL-Temp> ubotu is a bot, travlr :)