dhon_ | hi all, I've got files in d:\project\subdir under version control and I'd like to add files in d:\project. I'd say I need to change the root bzr directory to d:\project - how do I do that & preserve the history in subdir? | 00:10 |
---|---|---|
dhon_ | I guess I could just move the .bzr directory and then "bzr move --after" all the original files into subdir? | 00:12 |
dhon_ | thoughts? | 00:12 |
Peng | You could probably do this with rich roots. | 00:15 |
dhon_ | what are rich roots? | 00:17 |
Peng | The / directory entry of the branch is versioned. I'm pretty sure it's possible to move it. | 00:19 |
dhon_ | Peng: so I could convert the repo to rich roots format and then move the root somehow? | 00:22 |
Peng | dhon_: Maybe. | 00:23 |
Peng | I dunno. | 00:24 |
Peng | I just tried it and it tracebacked. | 00:24 |
dhon_ | Peng: what commands did you use? | 00:30 |
Peng | dhon_: "bzr mv . foo". Traceback. :) | 00:31 |
Peng | I'm pretty sure rich root formats should be able to support that; perhaps bzr doesn't yet though. | 00:32 |
jelmer | Peng: I doubt that will ever work - it doesn't even work for a regular mv | 00:39 |
Peng | Ok. | 00:39 |
Peng | Shucks. | 00:39 |
jelmer | Peng: Although the error message should obviously be more sensible | 00:40 |
jelmer | Peng: what exactly are you trying to do? | 00:40 |
Peng | I was seeing if it was possible to move the root. | 00:41 |
jelmer | Peng: it is certainly possible to change the root - see the split command | 00:42 |
dhon_ | jelmer: I was trying to move the root from d:\project\subdir to d:\project | 00:50 |
dhon_ | so I could add files at that level | 00:50 |
dhon_ | I want the files in subdir to stay there (and to keep their history) | 00:51 |
dhon_ | on another note: is it possible to "branch" or "copy" a single file in a repo into two separate files? | 00:54 |
dhon_ | eg 1.txt to 1a.txt & 1b.txt? | 00:54 |
jelmer | dhon_: "bzr join" should be able to do that | 01:07 |
jelmer | dhon_: (moving the root from d:\project\subdir to d:\project) | 01:08 |
jelmer | dhon_: There's no way to split a file at the moment | 01:08 |
dhon_ | jelmer: thanks - help shows join as still experimental as of 1.2 so I think I'll stay clear for the moment | 01:38 |
=== jamesh__ is now known as jamesh | ||
=== mark1 is now known as markh | ||
Peng | jelmer: Is it just me, or did you define CachingParentsProvider twice? | 07:24 |
Odd_Bloke | jelmer: Congrats on the release! | 08:22 |
=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
aantn | hello | 09:56 |
aantn | does bzr uncommit actually revert your files | 09:56 |
bob2 | no | 09:57 |
aantn | I'm trying to change the revision log and bzr uncommit seems to be the only way to do so | 09:57 |
bob2 | (the point of uncommit is to not revert the files) | 09:57 |
aantn | bob2: what does the --dry-run flag do? | 09:57 |
=== aantn is now known as aantn|pancakes | ||
bob2 | just show you what it would do (which is not all that useful for 'uncommit') | 10:03 |
=== aantn|pancakes is now known as aantn | ||
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== mw|out is now known as mw | ||
fbond | Hi, I'm seeing "authorization failed" trying to push to an svn repository. svn has already cached my credentials. What am I missing? | 13:36 |
jelmer | fbond: have you prefixed the URL with svn+ ? | 13:37 |
fbond | Oh, hmm... | 13:37 |
fbond | Yes. | 13:37 |
fbond | Pushing to svn+http://... | 13:37 |
jelmer | what os are you on? The caching trick doesn't work on Windows or Mac OS X | 13:37 |
fbond | Oh, maybe... | 13:37 |
fbond | I'm on LInux | 13:37 |
fbond | But I'm pushing to the trunk URL, should I instead be pushing to the repository root? | 13:38 |
jelmer | no, you should indeed be pushing to the trunk URL | 13:38 |
fbond | Oh, okay. | 13:38 |
jelmer | committing to this repository using SVN works ok, without any passwords being prompted? | 13:38 |
fbond | Yep, that's right. | 13:38 |
fbond | bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: ".": CHECKOUT of '/logistix/!svn/ver/183/trunk/pkg-src': authorization failed (http://svn.local.network) | 13:38 |
fbond | The error is on CHECKOUT, which is interesting... | 13:39 |
fbond | I'm using bzr-svn 0.4.8, bzr 1.2 | 13:41 |
fbond | jelmer: I'm using a bzr branch, not an svn wc. That's normal, right? | 13:42 |
fbond | jelmer: i.e. I made the branch with `bzr branch ...'; is this even relevant? | 13:42 |
jelmer | fbond: yeah, that all sounds fine | 13:43 |
jelmer | fbond: what version of svn are you using? | 13:44 |
fbond | On my workstation: version 1.4.4 (r25188) | 13:44 |
fbond | On the server: version 1.3.2 (r19776) | 13:45 |
fbond | jelmer: Do you need mod_svn version info? | 13:45 |
jelmer | Odd_Bloke: thanks :-) | 13:45 |
jelmer | Peng: Whoops, fixing.. | 13:46 |
jelmer | fbond: Sorry, no idea | 13:48 |
jelmer | fbond: and you were able to create a bzr branch of the svn branch earlier without problems, or does that not require authorization? | 13:49 |
fbond | jelmer: only write access requires auth. | 13:55 |
fbond | jelmer: I'll try making the branch again, I think I made it with an earlier version of bzr/bzr-svn... | 13:56 |
jelmer | fbond: that shouldn't be relevant | 13:56 |
fbond | jelmer: Hmm. Is there any way to turn on debug logging so I can see what's going on? | 13:56 |
jelmer | fbond: running bzr with -Dtransport will print to ~/.bzr.log what it is trying to do | 13:57 |
fbond | jelmer: thanks! | 13:59 |
jelmer | fbond: there is no way to debug the authentication step though - that all happens deep down inside the subversion libraries | 13:59 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: bzr builddeb does not use LP as it's bugtracker, do you have a link to the upstream one? | 14:05 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: the exception was raised by bzr itself, so you should file a bug against bzr | 14:07 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: kk | 14:07 |
jelmer | andrea-bs: afiak it just uses the debian bugtracker | 14:07 |
andrea-bs | jelmer: thanks | 14:08 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/206013 | 14:14 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 206013 in bzr "bzrlib.errors.ObjectNotLocked: KnitPackRepository('...') is not locked error when using --merge mode" [Undecided,New] | 14:14 |
andrea-bs | thanks rexbron | 14:14 |
rexbron | I would still like to file a bug against bzr-builddeb for the uncommited changes problem | 14:15 |
rexbron | does anyone have a link to their tracker? | 14:15 |
james_w | rexbron: bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-builddeb | 14:16 |
rexbron | james_w: I was intending to file it against the upstream code base | 14:16 |
james_w | rexbron: I'll move the existing bug over, thanks. | 14:17 |
rexbron | ok will post a link soon | 14:17 |
james_w | rexbron: ah, I never enabled launchpad bugs for it, I'll move it to the Ubuntu package for now. | 14:19 |
james_w | rexbron: please don't use pastebin for tracebacks on bug reports, as they expire. | 14:20 |
rexbron | I will not in future, I just looked at the scroll back from an earlier conversation | 14:20 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: mh... strange... I'm not able to reproduce the situation | 14:22 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: Could be a pecurilarity of the branch | 14:23 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: could you give me the exact command you used, please? | 14:23 |
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
rexbron | andrea-bs: just to remind you, this is from a script not from the commandline | 14:24 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: oh, right | 14:24 |
rexbron | I am making this call: | 14:24 |
rexbron | builddeb.run(branch=self.debianLocalLocation, result='./build-area', orig_dir='./', builder='dpkg-buildpackage ' + self.debuildOptions, merge = True) | 14:24 |
fbond | jelmer: got my issue resolved; svn was acting *very* oddly... | 14:24 |
fbond | jelmer: it seems that it cached auth info that worked for me, but wasn't my user, or something similar. | 14:25 |
fbond | I minimized the server-side config to allow just me, and it asked for a new password. | 14:25 |
fbond | Dunno | 14:25 |
fbond | Fixed now, anyway. | 14:25 |
rexbron | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr-builddeb/+bug/206021 | 14:27 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 206021 in bzr-builddeb "builddeb should raise a python exception when the .run() method is called and there are uncommited changes to the working tree" [Undecided,New] | 14:27 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: as for the first bug I reported, it could have something to do with the watch file not existing | 14:29 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: does "debian.bleedingedge/.bzr" exist? | 14:30 |
ubotu | New bug: #206013 in bzr-builddeb "bzrlib.errors.ObjectNotLocked: KnitPackRepository('...') is not locked error when using --merge mode" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206013 | 14:30 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: yes, otherwise bd would not work if the orig-dir is set correctly | 14:31 |
fbond | jelmer: I probably would have seen the issue right away in ~/.subversion/auth/svn.simple; everything is in plain text in a file whose name looks like a hash. | 14:32 |
fbond | jelmer: may want to suggest that if anyone else asks. | 14:32 |
fbond | jelmer: also, this is an interesting passage from the svn book: | 14:33 |
fbond | http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.serverconfig.pathbasedauthz.html; Partial Readability and Checkouts | 14:33 |
fbond | jelmer: thanks again | 14:33 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: sorry, I can't reproduce it: I get every time a IOError (No such file or directory) :( | 14:40 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: try and pull this branch https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bleedingedge/blender/debian.bleedingedge | 14:42 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: done | 14:43 |
rexbron | still the same error? | 14:43 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: there's no "blender-svn.py" file | 14:43 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: copy the bzr-bd.run() method I posted (replacing the varriable where nessicary) and try it out | 14:44 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: Could not find the upstream tarball after uscan | 14:47 |
rexbron | it won't as I am creating it at run time | 14:47 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: I've tried with all possible orig-dirs, they all raise a good exception to me | 14:52 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: Could it be version specific? | 14:53 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: probably, which version of bzr and builddeb are you using? | 14:53 |
rexbron | I am running bzr 1.0 and bd 0.90 | 14:54 |
rexbron | Ubuntu Gutsy with backports | 14:54 |
andrea-bs | oh, now I understand | 14:54 |
rexbron | :) | 14:54 |
andrea-bs | I'm using bzr 1.2.0.candidate.1 and builddeb 0.92.0dev0 | 14:54 |
* rexbron appolgises not not mentioning this sooner | 14:55 | |
andrea-bs | you told me you were using the 1.0 so I was thinking you were on hardy | 14:55 |
andrea-bs | I mark the bug as "Fix released" so | 14:55 |
rexbron | andrea-bs: wait | 14:55 |
rexbron | I will try to reproduce it on hardy and if not, we can mark it as released | 14:55 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: sure | 14:55 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: ok, great idea | 14:56 |
andrea-bs | rexbron: generally I prefer to close bugs and reopen them because sometimes the reporters forget to tell if the bug still occur, so I'm going to mark it "Incomplete": it will expire after 60 days | 14:58 |
rexbron | ok | 14:58 |
james_w | rexbron: the raising an exception thing is completely different in newer releases. | 15:09 |
james_w | rexbron: it doesn't complain at all and just builds the working tree. | 15:09 |
rexbron | james_w: ok | 15:12 |
c0le | hello people.. | 16:08 |
c0le | I have a doubt with bzr-svn .. | 16:08 |
james_w | hi c0le | 16:09 |
c0le | james_w: I noticed that bzr-svn is adding an entry to the bzr:revision-id:v3-trunk property of svn every time I do a commit.. | 16:10 |
c0le | Does this list of entries in the property keep increasing ? | 16:10 |
c0le | or does it get recycled after reaching a max number of entrieS? | 16:11 |
james_w | I don't know, I think it keeps increasing. | 16:12 |
c0le | james_w: Ouch :-S that would look bad after a 1000 such commits.. | 16:12 |
dato | I think that entry contains the full revision history | 16:12 |
dato | so yes, it'll increase afaik | 16:13 |
james_w | c0le: are you using trac? | 16:13 |
c0le | james_w: Yes, and I can see the list increasing over each commit.. | 16:13 |
c0le | james_w: i.e., trac shows it in the changeset.. | 16:14 |
james_w | c0le: I think there's a way to turn of the display of them. | 16:14 |
c0le | james_w: Aw.. something like 'ignore property'? | 16:15 |
james_w | c0le: I've no idea what the option is, I just think I remember someone mentioning such a thing before. | 16:16 |
c0le | Hmm.. I wonder how git-svn does this tracking.. | 16:16 |
c0le | james_w: ok.. i'll google on that.. | 16:16 |
james_w | it doesn't | 16:16 |
c0le | james_w: ah, ok.. | 16:17 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
* lamont tries again to understand how to break from bzr's belief that he wants a directory-per-branch and create a single working tree with multiple branches in it that he can switch between | 17:08 | |
luks | lamont: bzr init-repo --no-trees foo; bzr init foo/branchA; bzr co --lighweight foo/branchA workingtree | 17:10 |
luks | then you can have as many treeless branches under foo as you want | 17:10 |
luks | and switch the working tree with bzr switch | 17:10 |
jelmer | c0le: git-svn doesn't do tracking as far as I know | 17:11 |
jelmer | c0le: bzr-svn 0.5 will hopefully support storing that sort of metadata in revision properties rather than file properties | 17:11 |
* lamont wonders "what sort of tracking"? | 17:13 | |
jelmer | lamont: All bzr-specific metadata | 17:15 |
lamont | ah, ok | 17:15 |
jelmer | lamont: so it is possible to push a bzr branch into svn and then create that exact same branch again from the data pushed into svn | 17:15 |
james_w | jelmer: isn't it that git doesn't need to, as its model doesn't create a parallel imports problem? | 17:20 |
james_w | lamont: cbranch from bzrtools may also help with that workflow. | 17:20 |
luks | james_w: it still stores more metadata than svn can | 17:20 |
dato | like full author name | 17:21 |
luks | author name, author date, etc. | 17:21 |
dato | or timezone | 17:21 |
jelmer | james_w: it reduces the need for full round-tripping support | 17:21 |
james_w | ah, ok. | 17:22 |
MikeJJ | hi, i'm trying to install Bazaar on windows following the quick install guide (the python one), but i get stumped here . . . | 17:57 |
MikeJJ | "Bzr Tools and Bazaar GUI needs to be compiled. Use same procedure as for compiling Paramiko." i fail at finding how to compile Paramiko :P | 17:58 |
MikeJJ | any advice ? :) | 17:58 |
luks | python setup.py install? | 17:58 |
MikeJJ | lol, that simple ? thanks :D | 17:59 |
luks | I don't really know, just guessing | 17:59 |
MikeJJ | well, looks like that did it. thanks again :) | 18:00 |
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
thekorn | hi, I've got another bzrlib question: what is the easiest way of getting the 'kind' of an unknown file in a workingtree? | 18:52 |
james_w | thekorn: osutils.file_kind is what you want I think | 18:53 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, another question for you - should this be reported as a bug?: "Using saved location: https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk | 18:53 |
arnetheduck | bzr-svn is not up to date with installed bzr version 1.3. | 18:53 |
arnetheduck | There should be a newer version of bzr-svn available. | 18:53 |
arnetheduck | bzr: ERROR: Transport operation not possible: http does not support mkdir() | 18:53 |
arnetheduck | " | 18:53 |
james_w | arnetheduck: are you doing push? | 18:54 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, when pushing a new directory to svn... | 18:54 |
arnetheduck | james_w, yes | 18:54 |
james_w | can you try "bzr push svn+https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk" | 18:54 |
arnetheduck | james_w, I think it may be working since the command is taking a lot longer now =) | 18:57 |
arnetheduck | (it's a big commit and sf isn't the fastest site on the net | 18:58 |
james_w | arnetheduck: if it works do "bzr push --remember svn+https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk" | 18:58 |
thekorn | james_w, oh, i'm too much focused on bzrlib that I don't see the obvious | 18:58 |
james_w | thekorn: no problem | 18:59 |
arnetheduck | james_w, that's what I did actually =) | 18:59 |
james_w | arnetheduck: great, your faster than me :-) | 19:00 |
abentley | james_w: I would use Tree.kind, unless trying to get the kind of unversioned files. | 19:01 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: to push new branches, use "bzr svn-push" | 19:02 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, it wasn't a new branch, just a new dir in an existing branch... | 19:02 |
james_w | thekorn: you said "unknown" you meant "unversioned" rather than "arbitrary" didn't you? | 19:03 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, btw, should I worry about the 1.3 warning? | 19:03 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: how do you mean? | 19:03 |
arnetheduck | "bzr-svn is not up to date with installed bzr version 1.3" | 19:03 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: 0.4.9 is out and supports bzr 1.3 | 19:04 |
thekorn | thekorn, well, I think i'm a bit confused: I would like to get all files which are in the 'unknown' section when I run 'bzr status' | 19:05 |
thekorn | james_w, i meant | 19:05 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, bugger, I checked yesterday I think and it wasn't =) | 19:05 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: the warning itself isn't really worrysome but you'll find that one or two things give tracebacks | 19:05 |
thekorn | james_w, and I thought I could get these files with tree.unknowns() | 19:05 |
thekorn | but this does not work as expected | 19:06 |
james_w | thekorn: yes, I think that's right, and in that case osutils.file_kind is the correct function to use to get the kind. | 19:07 |
james_w | what do you get that you don't expect? | 19:07 |
thekorn | james_w, damn I'm always mixing workingtree and revisiontree, sorry, my problem is that list(revtree.unknowns()) always returns an empty list | 19:10 |
thekorn | when revtree is an revisiontree object | 19:10 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, the one I reported the other day? something about some revision number being wrong? | 19:10 |
james_w | thekorn: I think that's right isn't it? | 19:11 |
thekorn | james_w, I don't know, have not read any documentations on this, can't revision trees have unknown files? | 19:13 |
thekorn | and if so, why is there a unknowns()-method for RevisionTree-objects? | 19:14 |
Peng | Hmm, one project moved its svn repo to Google Code. Does svn consider the repos different and does bzr-svn? | 19:15 |
Peng | Hmmm, I think it might have changed significantly. | 19:17 |
Peng | There are fewer revisions in G Code. | 19:17 |
=== mw is now known as mw|food | ||
james_w | thekorn: a revisiontree is a committed state, so I think it makes sense for it to have 0 unknowns | 19:19 |
james_w | as to whether the method should be implemented on it I am not too sure. | 19:19 |
thekorn | james_w, yes this makes sense, thank you | 19:20 |
arnetheduck | james_w, here's what I got now: bzr: ERROR: libsvn._core.SubversionException: ("MKCOL of '/svnroot/dcplusplus/!svn/wrk/0dd13b40-b1d2-4fab-9b0e-5fb8b3a13bb3/dcplusplus/trunk': 405 Method Not Allowed (https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net)", 175002) | 19:21 |
james_w | arnetheduck: I have no idea about that I'm afraid. | 19:23 |
abentley | It's implemented on Tree so that we don't have to special-case other functions depending on their Tree type. | 19:25 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, how about http://www.pastebin.ca/955617? | 19:34 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: one sec | 20:08 |
=== mw|food is now known as mw | ||
jelmer | arnetheduck: doesn't make much sense to me. I don't understand why bzr would be trying to create a directory there | 20:09 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, it does make sense - svn by default first creates a working folder for the transaction, commits everything there and then moves the transaction to a new revision file... | 20:18 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, could it be that the digest auth is not being sent (when using pure svn, my credentials are fetched automagically)? | 20:19 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: that all happens under the hood though - the protocol doesn't include commands like that | 20:25 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: does "bzr branch <repos-url>" list the branch you're trying to push to? | 20:27 |
ubotu | New bug: #127734 in bzr-gtk "Progress bars as widgets" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127734 | 20:46 |
=== barry is now known as barry-away | ||
lifeless | moin | 20:57 |
abentley | lifeless: moin | 20:58 |
jelmer | hey lifeless, abentley | 20:58 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, I've successfully committed to the svn branch before, but never with a new directory | 21:04 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: you added a new directory in your bzr branch and you're now trying to push the revision that added that directory? | 21:05 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, correct | 21:14 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, now that I think about it, I first removed a directory and then added one with the same name | 21:14 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, hm, that makes it two revisions to commit - one that removes a directory (and contents), then another that adds a directory (and contents) with the same name as the one removed | 21:15 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: that shouldn't be relevant here though | 21:16 |
jelmer | the mkdir call you're seeing is about creating a new branch, not about a directory in a branch | 21:16 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, I'll try again, maybe it was some temporary error | 21:17 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: I doubt that | 21:18 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: does "bzr branch <repos-url>" list the branch you're trying to push to? | 21:18 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: sorry, I mean "bzr branches <repos-url>" | 21:18 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, running... | 21:23 |
* Peng wonders what bzr-svn is doing. | 21:31 | |
Peng | Augh! | 21:32 |
Peng | It took like 2 minutes to pull 1 revision! | 21:33 |
jelmer | Peng: are you using 0.4.9 ? | 21:33 |
Peng | jelmer: I'm using yesterday's 0.4 branch. | 21:34 |
jelmer | Peng: the development branch can have major performance regressions while in flux | 21:34 |
Peng | Apparently so. | 21:34 |
mathrick | hiya | 21:37 |
Peng | Hello. | 21:37 |
mathrick | what would be the easiest / best way of serving a writeable public repo with authentication? | 21:38 |
Peng | mathrick: bzr+ssh? | 21:39 |
mathrick | Peng: and without ssh? | 21:40 |
james_w | webdav? | 21:40 |
mathrick | okay, I guess ssh is the easier way then | 21:40 |
Peng | Yeah. | 21:41 |
Peng | If it's a FOSS project, you could use Launchpad. | 21:41 |
mathrick | it's not, not yet anyway | 21:41 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, it's still stuck... | 21:45 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: in the "bzr branches.." run? | 21:46 |
jelmer | it took only a minute or so here.. | 21:46 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, here's what I tried: "bzr branches svn+https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/dcplusplus/trunk" | 21:46 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: please try the repository url | 21:47 |
jelmer | bzr branches | 21:47 |
jelmer | svn+https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/ | 21:47 |
spiv | Good morning. | 21:57 |
lifeless | hi | 21:59 |
mathrick | bzrserve@sei.meidokon.net's password: | 22:24 |
mathrick | Server is too old for fast get_parent_map, reconnecting. (Upgrade the server to Bazaar 1.2 to avoid this) | 22:24 |
mathrick | bzrserve@sei.meidokon.net's password: | 22:24 |
mathrick | why does it have to reconnect? | 22:24 |
mathrick | it makes me input the password twice | 22:25 |
james_w | mathrick: because the server is too old. | 22:25 |
mathrick | yeah, but why does it have to reconnect to use the older protocol? | 22:26 |
spiv | mathrick: because the older protocol wasn't designed to allow graceful degradation in the case where a client sends a request with a body but the server doesn't recognise the request | 22:28 |
lifeless | mathrick: because the old protocol let the server get confused about edge of messages | 22:28 |
mathrick | aha, not nice of it | 22:29 |
lifeless | mathrick: so there was no way to be sure when it was actually ready for new input | 22:29 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, bzr branches svn+https://dcplusplus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dcplusplus/ returned nothing | 22:38 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: what do you have the branching scheme set to? | 22:41 |
arnetheduck | auto I think, didn't specify anything, and when importing it got my branches right so... | 22:45 |
arnetheduck | jelmer, sorry, gotta go, I'll check back tomorrow... | 22:45 |
jelmer | the fact "bzr branches" returns nothing suggests something may be wrong there | 22:45 |
jelmer | arnetheduck: what does "bzr svn-branching-scheme <repos-url>" print? | 22:45 |
ubotu | New bug: #206242 in bzr-svn "Add append-revisions-only setting for Subversion repositories" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206242 | 22:46 |
lifeless | spiv: looks like only us around; point 2 point call ? | 22:58 |
spiv | lifeless: sure. | 22:59 |
igc | morning | 23:04 |
evarlast | is it possible to branch or export a subdirectory of a repository? maybe this is called NestedTreeSupport ? | 23:22 |
Peng | evarlast: To turn a subdirectory of a branch into its own branch, see bzr split. | 23:23 |
lifeless | evarlast: we discussed this in london | 23:24 |
lifeless | you can also split as Peng says | 23:24 |
lifeless | igc: hi, spiv and I just did a p2p call as we couldn't see any others :> | 23:24 |
igc | hi lifeless | 23:26 |
spiv | igc: FWIW, my plan for the day is email + smart impl of set_last_revision_info | 23:26 |
igc | spiv: thanks | 23:27 |
evarlast | thank you so much. I searched as searched and could not find split. | 23:27 |
igc | spiv,lifeless: my plan for the day is ... email + reviews + package the new hook we worked on at PyCon | 23:28 |
lifeless | igc: I'm working on versionedfiles | 23:33 |
ubotu | New bug: #206258 in bzr "incompatible repository error messages are unhelpful" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206258 | 23:37 |
sabdfl | hi folks | 23:53 |
sabdfl | are 1.3 packages available in the usual ppa? i haven't seen them for hardy yet | 23:53 |
sabdfl | and is there an agreement with the distro team to put 1.3 into hardy itself (not the ppa)? | 23:54 |
Peng | sabdfl: The PPA takes a few days to update. | 23:56 |
Peng | Hey, hg 1.0 is out. :) | 23:56 |
sabdfl | thanks peng, and congrats on the 1.0 | 23:57 |
=== mw is now known as mw|out | ||
Peng | Not congrats to me. | 23:58 |
Peng | I mean, I'm not one of their developers. | 23:58 |
sabdfl | ah, thought you were | 23:58 |
Peng | I'd *like* to be, if I was smart enough. :P | 23:58 |
Peng | (I'd like to do more than typo fixes on bzr too. I'm not a traitor!) | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!