[00:55] Jazzva: oh ... if its just an upgrade then don't bother :) [00:55] about the license [00:57] still no sponsor for prism :( [01:01] asac: Sure thing :)... There are few more things that I'm not sure how to deal with. The unzipped xpi does not contain a build script (which is sort of expected, I think). I suppose I could provide a build-xpi part in debian/rules, but I'm not sure if that's the right way... Well, that's what I can think of now :). I'll try to manage something in the afternoon. Gotta go to the work in the morning... Off to sleep. [04:40] trying to figure out if this is a legit issue or not, recently upgraded to hardy, I was already using ff 3.0 though but now using the hardy package. past few days cpu usage for firefox doesn't seem to leave the 15-20% range, even if I just have a few tabs open and not interacting with it [04:41] so has this been seen? anything I can do to help identify the cause? [08:28] Jazzva: how did the old package build the xpi? [08:37] asac_, it didn't. The xpi file was packaged inside... === asac_ is now known as asac [08:39] asac: hi [08:39] hi carlos [08:39] Jazzva: ah ... ok [08:39] asac: the export process was killed before it finished to do the Launchpad rollout [08:39] It unzipped the xpi, so it could apply the patches, though... [08:40] asac: in the other hand, launchpad.net is ready to get Firefox/Ubufox/thunderbird translations [08:40] carlos: \o/ [08:41] carlos: so has the import of translations already happened? [08:41] asac: we found two bugs, one is the one you are aware of, the other one is easily to workaround when uploading mozilla .xpi files and only affects zh-TW.xpi file (we will fix it in next cycle) [08:41] asac: not yet, I'm going to start it and I wonder whether you have en-US.xpi files for beta4 [08:41] or do you prefer to do it with the beta3 one? [08:42] asac: btw, on sunday, we will get a language pack export including those xpi files already [08:43] cool [08:43] asac: so, should I upload beta3 xpi files? [08:44] i think you can go with them. we could use that to try the upgrade that way? [08:44] sure, we can update to beta4 anytime we want [08:44] carlos: ok, then lets do it [08:45] there should not have been many string changes anyway [08:45] in fact, if you include the xpi in your source package build, we should do it automatically [08:45] well, if pitti applied the required changes to the buildd packages [08:45] asac: what about ubufox? [08:46] carlos: ok, then lets try it with beta 5 upload [08:46] carlos: pitti already does that afaict [08:46] asac: when will it be uploaded? [08:47] i expect beta5 to be out any time soon [08:50] carlos: we received a bunch of translations through the community for ubufox. i need to integrate them first, so we can import these as translations [08:50] ill have to check back with saivann about the state. [08:50] if not today, i can give you en-US.xpi + a bunch of translations by monday [08:52] ok [08:53] asac: I will be in London next week in a sprint. If you cannot talk with me on IRC, send me it by email, please [08:53] sure [08:53] whole launchpad team in london or just parts? [08:54] just translations [09:10] asac: btw, please, change https://launchpad.net/xulrunner and https://launchpad.net/firefox so they don't say that use translations officially [09:10] those are for products, not Ubuntu packages, and Mozilla is not using Launchpad officially (at least yet) [09:10] carlos: looking [09:11] yeah ... i think if translations work well, that could change :) [09:11] carlos: what do you mean ... i don't see an option to say "unofficially" [09:12] asac: well, you just need to say that those products don't use translations at all [09:12] Ubuntu translations will be done from ubuntu/hardy/+source/.... [09:12] carlos: jtv asked me to flip that a few days back [09:13] asac: that's because a trick we use to do the manual upload [09:13] not sure why, but it felt like it was needed [09:13] and is not really needed [09:13] ah ok [09:13] because I will move the template and translations to the right place [09:13] once everything is imported [09:13] so you will be able to see it inside the ubuntu url space [09:14] ok done [09:14] thanks [11:23] carlos: where can i get a most recent export from? [11:25] asac: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+language-packs [11:25] there you have the registry of exports [11:31] ok thanks [13:14] asac, the apport hook in ff3 is totally broken [13:17] fta: didn't you add a fix? [13:18] the install, yes but there are also bugs in the python code [13:19] i'm fixing it [13:21] the install? you mean the firefox-addons directory for inspecting global extensions, right? [13:21] fta: ? [13:21] no,it dies in asserts at several places [13:21] ouch [13:22] in some "launchpad" library? [13:22] no, directly in that code [13:22] i should be able to fix it properly shortly [13:23] carlos: so i need to grab the "full language pack" from that page, right? [13:23] asac: not really, your script should be integrated with pitti's scripts to generate language packs [13:24] carlos: i want to test [13:24] he already fetchs, builds and compile it [13:24] oh, for testing purpososes!... yeah [13:24] well ... i need them anyway ;) [13:24] ok ... downloading 400 MB [13:24] however, there is no language pack yet with xpi packages inside [13:24] or is the base language pack enough? [13:24] carlos: not? [13:24] hmm [13:24] asac: we are doing the import in production right now [13:25] doesn't matter ... i gues i have them somewhere for testing [13:25] and language packs are exported twice per week [13:26] ok [13:26] carlos: so where do i get a current export with the .po files from? [13:26] staging? [13:26] or is that in the full translations? [13:26] (sorry if i ask something thats already clear) [13:26] (i am just confused :)) [13:27] well, the staging export was cancelled due to the rollout [13:27] we had to stop the export before it was complete [13:28] I'm waiting for the production import and then, prepare a tarball for you for testing purposes [13:29] any new language pack export after tomorrow will include the xpi and .po files for firefox [13:29] carlos: ok [13:29] can i get something now? [13:29] so you will be able to do tests directly from there [13:29] didn't we have langpacks a few days back? or did they have syntactially issues? [13:29] asac: not yet, sorry, still doing imports... [13:29] unless you want a partial export [13:29] carlos: i am fine with just two languages if thats possible [13:30] even one language would be enough [13:30] asac: we had, but if I don't have that data imported, the language packs cannot include it ;-) [13:30] i just want to be sure that its exactly the same form as we get it later [13:30] so i can flash out any issues [13:30] (same form == for .po file) [13:30] i don't mind a missing en-US.xpi :) [13:31] asac: ok, xulrunner or firefox? [13:31] or both? [13:31] both please [13:32] i want to test to start the application [13:32] carlos: i read the announcement of matthew ... he doesn't mention anything about .xpi imports (not even as an experimental feature) [13:32] did it slip through ... or better not aanounce yet? [13:33] jtv decided to be completely sure that the full cycle works and then, send another announcement [13:33] great [13:33] i think thats a good decision [13:34] carlos: so can i cancel the full tranlsation download? [13:34] yes, it's useless for what you want [13:34] good [13:35] asac: I just requested a download, once I get the confirmation email I will provide you with the URLs [13:36] thx [13:49] asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12946358/launchpad-export.tar.gz [13:49] asac: that's firefox [13:50] asac: you have all .po files there, except that most are without translations [13:50] ignore the directory layout, it will be different in the language pack (what we already agreed) [14:44] carlos: how about xulrunner= [14:44] ? [14:44] you have a link as well? [14:45] yeah, sorry, the email took more time to arrive and got distracted... [14:45] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12946587/launchpad-export.tar.gz [14:46] carlos: np ... i am distracted all the time :) [14:51] The mailing list is at https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators [14:51] hmmm [14:51] wrong channel :-P [14:51] asac: you see, I'm completely distracted [14:51] haha [14:52] well ... that info is probably useful here as well :) [14:53] asac: well, I was near pasting the admin password too... [14:54] asac, xul head is now 1.9pre, it's not good for us as it gives 1.9~cvs so in control, it ends up as >= 1.9~b5~ << 1.9~ [15:15] mozilla bug 419116 [15:15] Mozilla bug 419116 in MailNews: Composition "Sending mail through SMTP server that doesn't require user:pass fails" [Major,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419116 [15:16] mozilla bug 416282 [15:16] Mozilla bug 416282 in General "Seamonkey/xpfe needs patch for bug 376473" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416282 [16:00] asac, you're doing seamonkey ? [16:09] fta: not right now [16:09] i wsa just told about those patches [16:09] and that they should go into the distro patchset for 1.8.0 branch [16:17] did you sort the libjpeg bug out ? [17:34] Member since: 2007-03-28 [17:34] oh, 1 year today :) [17:50] When the source doesn't provide the build script, should I write a part in debian/rules to build the xpi file? [17:50] Or should I just package the xpi file itself? [18:20] asac, did you work on bug 203413? [18:21] Launchpad bug 203413 in liferea "Liferea creates many corrupt copies of places.sqlite in its Mozilla profile folder" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203413 [18:22] fta: nope [18:22] sounds dirty [18:22] indeed [18:23] fta@ix:~/.liferea_1.4/mozilla/liferea $ ls *corrupt | wc -l [18:23] 3293 [18:23] the oldest is: -rw------- 1 fta fta 126976 2008-02-28 00:18 places.sqlite.corrupt [18:23] I was running 1.9~b4~cvs20080227t1139+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 [18:24] before, i had 1.9~b4~cvs20080227t1139+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 [18:24] but i don't remember when liferea was restarted [18:24] oops, 1.9~b4~cvs20080224t1029+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1 [18:25] so it's a possible window for that bug [18:30] asac: hi, did you have any problem with the .po files? [18:31] carlos: cannot really tell. i am still fighting a bit with the converter :) [18:31] ok [18:34] * asac out to get some food [19:45] asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=738132 [19:47] yeah [20:03] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=737666 [20:08] hmm [20:17] same with b5 rc2: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6168/ [20:18] [reed], ^^ [20:20] <[reed]> I _think_ that's been fixed [20:20] <[reed]> mozilla bug 425593, maybe? [20:20] Mozilla bug 425593 in Printing "Print failure: 'Some printing functionality not implemented yet' message" [Major,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425593 [20:21] when ? it's b5 rc2 with system cairo 1.5.14 [20:21] <[reed]> maybe not it, though [20:21] <[reed]> anyway, you could ask vlad on moznet [20:21] <[reed]> gotta run [20:21] <[reed]> bbiab [20:58] lasted nightly doesn't crash