[02:25] <fta> [reed], which component would that be ?
[02:26] <[reed]> Firefox :: Places
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[13:57] <asac> fta_: backing out https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=305934 fixes it?
[14:08] <fta_> mozilla bug 425993
[14:08] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 425993 in Places "liferea built with xulrunner 1.9 dumping tons of places.sqlite-\d+.corrupt files" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425993
=== fta_ is now known as fta
[14:10] <asac> fta: you see an assertion there?
[14:10] <asac> eah NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS failure
[14:11] <fta> liferea doesn't have a console
[14:11] <fta> i've traced it
[14:11] <asac> traced it?
[14:11] <fta> printf :)
[14:11] <asac> fta: you see NS_ENSURE_SUCESS failures only in debug mode on the terminal
[14:11] <asac> aeh debug builds
[14:12] <asac> fta: ok ... what fails?
[14:12] <asac> probably not the CreateStatement itself
[14:13] <fta> it returns to the caller at line 1150
[14:14] <asac> really?
[14:14] <asac> wow
[14:14] <asac> so its a syntax error?
[14:14] <asac> can you run that statement in sqlite3 shell?
[14:16] <asac> maybe it happens for new firefox profiles too now?
[14:16] <asac> fta: ^^
[14:20] <fta> i don't know
[14:20] <fta> bug 192606
[14:20] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 192606 in firefox-3.0 "use standard colours for selected text in URL bar" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192606
[14:20] <fta> is that fixed ?
[14:21] <asac> fta: yeah i think i know whats going on
[14:27] <fta> ?
[14:33] <asac> bogus sqlite
[14:33] <asac> ill think about how to fix it properly while away
[14:34] <asac> be back tonight
[14:34] <fta> ok, cu
[14:40] <armin76> ff-2.0.0.13 doesn't start when compiled with gcc-4.2.3 :/
[14:41] <armin76> .12 does, weird, huh?
[16:32] <fta> armin76, do you have a crash when printing to pdf ?
[16:34] <armin76> didn't try
[16:37] <fta> FF3 of course
[17:46] <asac> fta: btw, i can print to pdf in ffox 3 beta 4
[17:47] <asac> fta: read in  -desktop for how we can try to solve the sqlite issue
[17:54] <sebner> aloha
[17:55] <asac> sebner: what is the problem?
[17:57] <sebner> asac: If I try to build monodevelop it complains that the xulrunner1.9 patch can't be applied. So I changed the 0.18.1 to 1.0 (versioning) but then I discovered that some parts of the monodevelop.ini got rewrittten. I tried to adjust your patch but now I have a "Malformated line 35"
[18:00] <sebner> asac: It's currently looking like that . http://pastebin.com/medc58ce
[18:11] <asac> sebner: now does the original patch look like?
[18:11] <asac> (sorry i cannot remember)
[18:11] <asac> sebner: how does the current monodevelop.in look like?
[18:12] <asac> (the new one)
[18:12] <asac> if nothing radical changed it should be fairly easy to do
[18:12] <asac> the patch basically removes all LD_LIBRARY_PATH and MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME business
[18:12] <asac> so just do that
[18:12] <asac> and all should be fine
[18:14] <sebner> asac: I already left a message in the query :P http://pastebin.com/mdcbeabc <-- monodevelop.in . xulrunner1.9 original: http://pastebin.com/m52446a83
[18:18] <asac> sebner: well ... find_libgtkmozembed is not called at all
[18:18] <asac> figure out where that is called and yo find the place where you need to adapt something - just as a guess
[18:19] <asac> so: the find_libgtkmozembed needs to be eliminated ... but for that you have to find where its actually used
[18:24] <sebner> asac: I'm confused. In you patch you deleted the call of find_libgtkmozembed and did the same with the new patch ...
[18:41] <asac> sebner: you really confuse me ... whats your problem?
[18:42] <asac> sounds like it already works for you ;)
[18:42] <sebner> asac: It tried to port your xulrunner1.9 patch to monodevelop 1.0. But it tells me "Malformated at line 35"
[18:42] <asac> sebner: so you edited the patch directly?
[18:42] <sebner> asac: no. diff the monodevelop.in
[18:43] <asac> sebner: you probably accidentially edited it
[18:43] <sebner> asac: patch is already posted. look at my first message to you
[18:43] <asac> use diff -u
[18:43] <asac> in this channel?
[18:43] <sebner> yes ;)
[18:43] <sebner> 18:57
[18:43] <sebner> ;)
[18:44] <asac> can't tell ... redo the patch
[18:44] <sebner> http://pastebin.com/medc58ce
[18:44] <asac> shouldn't happen if you use diff -u and don't touch it
[18:45] <sebner> hmm
[18:45] <sebner> I used diff -urNad ^^
[18:58] <sebner> asac: Sry. I'm not able to prepare a working patch.  applying patch use_xulrunner_1.9 to ./ ...patch: **** malformed patch at line 35:  if test -d /usr/lib64; then MD_PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$MD_PKG_CONFIG_PATH:/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/:/usr/local/lib64/pkgconfig/; fi
[19:04] <sebner> asac: would you mind taking a look on it?
[19:27] <fta> asac, about bug 139543, the guy asked for system prefs not overwritten during upgrades, not locked prefs, right ?
[19:28] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 139543 in firefox-3.0 "firefox .deb overwrites firefox.cfg which stores systemwide settings such as startpage, proxy" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139543
[20:47] <asac> fta: we should not ship it at all
[20:47] <asac> and yes, we should also make this available in /etc/
[20:48] <asac> sebner: you should start from scratch
[20:48] <asac> and try again
[20:50] <sebner> asac: what do you mean with "from scratch" ?
[20:50] <asac> well start over ... redo the patch ;)
[20:50] <asac> i mean ... apparently your current patch is broken
[20:50] <fta> asac, ?? not ship what ? and make what avail in /etc ?
[20:50] <asac> firefox.cfg
[20:51] <asac> sebner: and if you produce a patch like i said it _will_ apply for sure
[20:51] <sebner> asac: yeah. I tried again ;) same error
[20:52] <asac> use just diff -u
[20:52] <asac> and all is good
[20:52] <sebner> asac: patch: **** malformed patch at line 35:
[20:52] <sebner> I tried
[20:52] <sebner> ...
[20:52] <asac> maybe excersize with some simple files
[20:52] <sebner> I know how to diff O_o
[20:53] <asac> hmmm ... if you would, you won't get a malformed patch :)
[20:53] <asac> thats what i am trying to tell ... i cannot tell whats going on. really. if you give me the two file revisions i can make the patch
[20:53] <sebner> haha ...
[20:54] <asac> webdeveloper.in.orig + webdeveloper.in
[20:54] <asac> but ill just run diff -u webdeveloper.in.org webdeveloper.in
[20:55] <asac> aeh monodevelop.in
[20:55] <asac> youll figure
[20:56] <sebner> But I did :( :( :(
[20:57] <sebner> asac: http://senduit.com/b81d07
[20:58] <asac> whats that?
[20:58] <fta> asac, but it's not read at all in ff3. how was it used in ff2 ? a patch ?
[20:58] <asac> no .. a config ;)
[20:59] <sebner> asac: monodevelop. the old and the new file ;)
[21:03] <asac> asac@tinya:/tmp/qq$ diff -u monodevelop.old.in monodevelop.in > /tmp/my.patch
[21:03] <asac> asac@tinya:/tmp/qq$ mkdir uu
[21:03] <asac> asac@tinya:/tmp/qq$ cd uu/
[21:03] <asac> asac@tinya:/tmp/qq/uu$ cp ../monodevelop.old.in .
[21:03] <asac> asac@tinya:/tmp/qq/uu$ patch -p0 < /tmp/my.patch
[21:03] <asac> patching file monodevelop.old.in
[21:03] <asac> sebner: ^^
[21:03] <fta> asac, hmm, that's what i thought but there's nothing in your ff2 branch pointing to it
[21:04] <fta> unless it's that obscure thingy
[21:04] <asac> fta: there is :)
[21:04] <fta> oh
[21:04] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox/greprefs$ grep general.config *
[21:04] <asac> all.js:pref("general.config.obscure_value", 13); // for MCD .cfg files
[21:04] <asac> firefox-2.ubuntu-prefs.js:pref("general.config.filename", "firefox-2.cfg");
[21:05] <sebner> asac: I'm going to commit suicide now. Don't wait for me -.- ...
[21:05] <asac> afaik the preference we locked in firefox 2 is now implicitly locked by ffox3 ... as it detects that it cannot write to the install location
[21:05] <asac> sebner: do exactly the same above :) ... that will give you a feeling of success ;)
[21:06] <sebner> asac: I swar. I did -.-
[21:06] <sebner> *swear
[21:07] <sebner> asac: and for the dpatch thing I have the headers right?
[21:08] <asac> sebner: do dpatch-edit-patch if its dpatch
[21:09] <asac> dpatch files need:
[21:09] <asac> #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
[21:09] <asac> +
[21:09] <asac> @DPATCH@
[21:09] <asac> <now patch>
[21:11] <fta> asac, hmm, if it's implicitly locked now, all this is not needed.. i don't get why you still want it then...
[21:12] <asac> fta: thats what i said :) ... we don't want to use it now. but we should take care that users can set their own firefox.cfg
[21:13] <asac> we can say "we don't care ... do it like oyu want" ... but that isn't nice as the user doesn't really have good way t odo that in a way that it doesn't get removed at some point.
[21:13] <fta> so you want a 2nd xul greprefs in etc ?
[21:13] <asac> fta: i don't think that its needed
[21:13] <asac> fta: we could also just provide a firefox.cfg link thats empty
[21:14] <asac> e.g. an empty firefox.cfg in /etc/ ...
[21:14] <asac> and link to it from greprefs in our package
[21:14] <fta> but it will be overwritten
[21:15] <fta> and the path is not fixed
[21:15] <asac> huh?
[21:15] <fta> greprefs
[21:16] <sebner> asac: btw, looked already at all-in-one-sidebar rev6 ?
[21:16] <asac> we can ship a link from $pkglibdir/global.cfg -> /etc/firefox-3.0/global.cfg
[21:29] <asac> sebner: maybe ship MPL and just reference that in copyright
[21:30] <asac> sebner: please use a non-native packaging
[21:30] <asac> e.g. the changelog versino doesn't have a package revision
[21:31] <sebner> k
[21:31] <asac> when thats done, please open a bug against the firefox-extensions project. we need that to refer to the FF exception we have for extensions
[21:31] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/
[21:32] <asac> there are already other bugs filed
[21:34] <asac> fta: maybe there is a bug because of the xul + ffox split. no idea if general.config files on a per-applicatoin basis are possible
[21:34] <asac> so maybe we need a patch for that
[21:35] <fta> aren't lockPref() allowed in syspref ?
[21:38] <asac> i don't think so
[21:38] <asac> lockPref is from libpref
[21:38] <asac> which is not the normal mechanism
[21:39] <asac> but haven't tried for years :)
[21:39] <asac> maybe its now supported by mainline prefs
[21:40] <sebner> asac: btw, in the dpatch is now my name and mail adress. change that to yoursß
[21:41] <asac> say: you + based on mine ;)
[21:41] <sebner> ^^
[21:41] <sebner> k
[21:41] <asac> so it worked?
[21:44] <sebner> we'll see in 1 minute
[21:45] <sebner> no xD xD xD
[21:45] <sebner> asac: http://pastebin.com/m795b716b
[21:46] <asac> sebner: why does it fail. figure that ;)
[21:47] <sebner> no output :\
[21:47] <asac> is it clean?
[21:47] <asac> what does lsdiff path/to/xulrunner.dpatch
[21:47] <asac> yield?
[21:48] <sebner> hellboy@ubuntu:~/merges/monodevelop/monodevelop-1.0+dfsg/debian/patches$ lsdiff use_xulrunner_1.9.dpatch
[21:48] <sebner> monodevelop.in
[21:51] <asac> probably wrong strip level
[21:51] <asac> did you use dpatch-edit-patch?
[21:52] <sebner> ah. I used dpatch patch-template and copied the header into the file
[22:06] <sebner> asac: I really don't know who but after the 20 try it's working now xD
[22:07]  * sebner looks like a total newbie now
[22:44] <asac> yeah ...dpatch is a pain ;)
[22:44] <fta> i hate it
[22:48] <fta> asac, in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9b5/greprefs/fta.js, i've set pref("general.config.filename", "firefox.cfg");
[22:49] <fta> where should firefox.cfg be ?
[22:49] <fta> i've tried: /etc/firefox-3.0/pref/  /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/defaults/preferences  /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5   /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9b5/greprefs  nada
[23:01] <asac> fta: yeah. most likely it has to be in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9b5/
[23:01] <asac> which means that we have the bug i mentioned above
[23:01] <asac> maybe greprefs in firefox-3.0b5 is considered for the general.config.filename entry as well?
[23:02] <fta> nope, still doesn't work in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9b5/
[23:02] <fta> there's no grepref in ff3
[23:06] <asac> greprefs ;)
[23:07] <asac> fta: you need to crypt it
[23:07] <asac> (obscure)
[23:07] <fta> i did
[23:07] <fta> strace does not even look for it
[23:07] <asac> do we build libpref extension at all?
[23:08] <fta> i get "Failed to read the configuration file. Please contact your system administrator"
[23:08] <asac> that sounds broken :)
[23:08] <fta> and it refused to start so at least there's some code behind it
[23:08] <asac> what did you dO?
[23:08] <asac> to break it that way?
[23:09] <asac> just add the general.config.filename pref?
[23:09] <fta> just set general.config.filename
[23:09] <fta> and the cfg is obscured
[23:11] <asac> fta: try to add pref extension the DEB_MOZ_EXTENSIONS
[23:13] <asac> its strange though thatit chokes on it ... i agree
[23:14] <fta> isn't it about sharedpref ?
[23:15] <asac> he?
[23:15] <asac> no pref is the lockdown extension
[23:16] <asac> and system prefs like gconf
[23:17] <fta> mozilla/config/autoconf.mk:MOZ_PREF_EXTENSIONS = 1
[23:17] <fta> so it's by default
[23:17] <fta> yes, there's --disable-pref-extensions to disable it
[23:18] <fta> so we already have it in xul
[23:32] <asac> fta: ok it works
[23:32] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6237/
[23:33] <asac> thats what must succeed
[23:44] <fta> what did you change ?
[23:45] <fta> oh, /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/defaults/autoconfig
[23:45] <asac> look closely ;)
[23:45] <asac> yeah
[23:45] <asac> i am pushing a xul patch
[23:45] <asac> to read that from GRE_DIR
[23:45] <asac> as its installed by xul build
[23:46] <asac> but bzr on launchpad is again really slow
[23:48] <fta> http://beuno.com.ar/archives/65
[23:48] <fta> hm, really weird rendering of http://fridge.ubuntu.com/node/1389
[23:49] <asac> yeaH
[23:49] <asac> website bug?
[23:51] <fta> probably, it renders the same with sm1 and sm2
[23:51] <asac> fta: same for upstream build?
[23:51] <asac> ah ok
[23:51] <asac> then ignore
[23:51] <asac> if its in old gecko engine i have no problem ;)
[23:56] <fta> you merged my commits ???
[23:56] <asac> fta: yes i tested what bzr push suggested
[23:56] <asac> feel free to push your tree again
[23:56] <asac> with --overwrite
[23:56] <asac> i can merge on top of that
[23:57] <asac> (i never did merge and push ... wonder why its ok to do that without --overwrite)
[23:58] <fta> i don't think i can, my branch has been changed
[23:58] <asac> really?
[23:58] <asac> wow
[23:58] <fta> with just a pull !? wtf?
[23:59] <asac> yeah ... thats a strange thing