afflux | okay, bed time now! good night! | 00:10 |
---|---|---|
lifeless | There will be a short interruption to bazaar.launchpad.net and the ubuntu wiki to deploy a fix for the performance problems. | 01:49 |
marnanel | pochu: a (fairly) good way of keeping up with current metacity bugs is the Metacity blog | 03:10 |
marnanel | pochu: it isn't just a log of fixes and things; we try to make it a good read | 03:10 |
pochu | marnanel: nice, *subscribes* | 03:15 |
pochu | marnanel: perhaps it could be syndicated in Planet GNOME... | 03:16 |
pochu | ? | 03:16 |
collusion | Playing with bug triage, I'm looking at LP#58162... Hardy has incorporated an upstream fix. What status should the bug be set to? | 03:35 |
RAOF | Fix released, if the fixed package is in the hardy archives. | 03:35 |
collusion | And as a random off-the-street user, I can set that status? | 03:36 |
RAOF | Yes. | 03:37 |
mrooney | RAOF: really, you don't even have to join BugSquad? | 03:38 |
collusion | empirically, ROAF speaks the truth :-) | 03:38 |
RAOF | mrooney: Indeed. Anyone can mark a bug as fixed. | 03:39 |
collusion | ubuntu-bugsquad isn't archived at gmane? | 03:41 |
marnanel | pochu: no, they won't do that; Planet GNOME is only for humans. It is at http://planet.gnome.org/news though, and one day there'll be a planet at http://news.gnome.org | 03:55 |
marnanel | believe me, I'd *like* it to be on Planet GNOME: it'd get a lot more readers :) | 03:56 |
erichj | who assigns bugs? | 04:05 |
twb | bugs, or bug tickets? ;-) | 04:06 |
erichj | bug tickets | 04:06 |
erichj | lets say you're triaging a bug and you have everything you need. It's been confirmed, it's not a dupe, all the proper attachments are part of the ticket. What happens after that. Does the person triaging the bug assign it to someone that maintains the package it affects? | 04:09 |
erichj | or does someone from that team just pick it up when they have the chance to take a look at it? | 04:09 |
RAOF | The latter, generally. We don't really have the Debian system of maintainers. | 04:10 |
erichj | ok | 04:10 |
RAOF | People will generally assign bugs _to themselves_ when they start to work on it. | 04:10 |
twb | RAOF: would that be analogous to (unused, AFAICT) "bts claim" under Debian? | 04:11 |
RAOF | I have no idea. That's the first time I've heard of such a thing :) | 04:12 |
erichj | triaging is kind of fun. at least it's something to do | 04:16 |
twb | Is bughelper(1) supposed to do anything other than just sit there when I run it without arguments? | 04:29 |
twb | (Or does it, without arguments, list *EVERY* bug?) | 04:30 |
=== Seveaz is now known as Seveas | ||
twb | I'm trying to understand how to report and manipulate bugs on Ubuntu without having to use the launchpad web UI (which I find extremely painful). I have discovered apport-cli. | 07:17 |
twb | I tried to run "apport-cli -p gnome-system-tools", but this exits immediately without an error status or, apparently, doing anything useful. | 07:17 |
RAOF | twb: Sorry, but I'm pretty sure that's going to spawn a firefox process on you. | 07:18 |
twb | Oh. | 07:18 |
RAOF | The mail interface remains? :/ | 07:18 |
twb | I was expecting something called -cli to have a command line or curses interface. | 07:19 |
twb | It seems to do something if I include -f | 07:19 |
twb | Unfortunately, that something is to fire up a web browser. | 07:20 |
twb | Namely w3m, which I believe cannot log into launchpad, because launchpad does naughty things with cookies. | 07:20 |
erichj | If I am triaging a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/209541 but I suspect that the problem isn't with the totem application but with gstreamer how do I go about running that down if I can't replicate the bug because mine works perfectly? | 08:02 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 209541 in totem "totem pauses for about 10 seconds before playing a movie in hardy" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 08:02 |
Lhademmor | Hi all, I'm new to the BugSquad, but would like to help with triaging. So far, I've tried triaging a few bugs today. Right now, I'm looking at bug 209532 and wondering what to do with it. My thoughts are to assign it to the at-spi package and try to confirm it. Is this the right way to do it? | 08:26 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 209532 in ubuntu "Accessibility keyboard settings get lost" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209532 | 08:26 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
erichj | no | 08:27 |
erichj | he says it's been reported before. find the other reports mark as dupe. move on | 08:27 |
Lhademmor | ok, will do. Thakns | 08:28 |
Lhademmor | *thanks | 08:28 |
thekorn | twb, you can write a python script using python-launchpad-bugs to report bugs without using a webbrowser, | 08:31 |
thekorn | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/python-launchpad-bugs/Bug | 08:31 |
twb | thekorn_: that's my intention | 08:41 |
twb | thekorn_: I went off on a tangent when I saw apport | 08:41 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
warren_ | hi | 09:41 |
warren_ | can someone look if he/her has the same problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/209578 | 09:41 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 209578 in gdebi "gdebi-kde crashes with an memory allocation error" [Undecided,New] | 09:41 |
james_w | warren_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/153943 ? | 09:44 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 153943 in gdebi "Gdebi-kde uses massive amounts of memory!" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 09:44 |
warren_ | no | 09:45 |
twb | Is ubotu clever enough to post a link if you just say something like this? | 09:46 |
twb | LP 153943 | 09:46 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 153943 in gdebi "Gdebi-kde uses massive amounts of memory!" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153943 | 09:46 |
twb | Cool. | 09:46 |
james_w | warren_: why isn't that the one? | 09:49 |
james_w | do you have loads of RAM? | 09:49 |
warren_ | no | 09:49 |
warren_ | the program can't allocate mem and nothing happens at all | 09:49 |
warren_ | it even doesn't start installing | 09:49 |
warren_ | the other bugs seems to install the package but uses too much memory | 09:50 |
james_w | ah, ok. | 09:53 |
warren_ | quite important bug IMHO | 09:54 |
Riddell | james_w: that's a known bug with gdebi, I've asked someone to fix it | 10:30 |
james_w | Riddell: ah, thanks | 10:31 |
* ogra_cmpc has similar probs on the classmate, it loads the full package db files into ram, if you only have main/restricted enabled it should work with a lot smaller footprint | 10:34 | |
ogra_cmpc | (classmate has 256M and no swap) | 10:35 |
ogra_cmpc | i dont know how thats fixable though ... you would need to load the file compressed into ram and uncompress on the fly or so,m but i suspect that would make everything slow | 10:36 |
twb | gdebi looks interesting, but does it have a non-GUI version? | 10:40 |
james_w | twb: wget and dpkg -i? | 10:57 |
james_w | actually, I don't think covers it all. | 10:58 |
twb | james_w: the point of gdebi, AIUI, is that you already have a .deb that you wgot, but you want it to resolv the debs automagically | 11:00 |
twb | Instead of running dpkg -i, waiting for it to fail because of missing deps, then apt-get installing those missing deps | 11:00 |
twb | (ICBW, I'm just going by the package description.) | 11:01 |
james_w | ah yeah, sorry | 11:01 |
james_w | I was getting it a bit confused with apturl | 11:01 |
twb | No problem. | 11:02 |
ogra_cmpc | gdebi is the non gui version | 11:14 |
ogra_cmpc | gdebi-gtk or -kde are the gui variants of that | 11:14 |
twb | ogra_cmpc: then why does gdebi depend on glade? | 11:14 |
twb | Oh, the names are a little different on Debian: gdebi = gdebi-gtk and gdebi-core = gdebi | 11:15 |
ogra_cmpc | because it ships gdebigtk by default | 11:15 |
ogra_cmpc | *gdebi-gtk | 11:16 |
ogra_cmpc | i guess Riddell would like to see the same split :) | 11:16 |
twb | Just sync from sid :P | 11:17 |
* twb ducks | 11:17 | |
ogra_cmpc | twb, given that the change was likely uploaded to debian to do exactly that i think that might happen :) | 11:28 |
pochu | marnanel: well, I hope it's written by humans ;) | 12:22 |
james_w | seb128: hi, I realise it's a universe package, but would you have any objection to the following upload for hardy? | 12:26 |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-python/+bug/44704 | 12:26 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 44704 in nautilus-python "Expects to find libpython2.4.so, should look for libpython2.4.so.1" [Low,Confirmed] | 12:26 |
james_w | it's a completely broken package at the moment, so we should have something. I'm just wondering if the proposed patch is the wrong solution. | 12:27 |
Iulian | Hey | 12:55 |
seb128 | james_w: will do it, ideally the sponsor teams should be subscribed on such bugs though | 12:58 |
seb128 | hello Iulian | 12:58 |
thekorn | james_w, your python-nautilus patch works for me, it's now nautilus-bzr.py spitting some tracebacks | 12:59 |
Iulian | Hi seb128 | 12:59 |
thekorn | hello Iulian, seb128 | 12:59 |
james_w | seb128: thanks, I just wanted to know if you had any objections, I'll subscribe the sponsors now. | 12:59 |
seb128 | hey thekorn | 12:59 |
james_w | thekorn: yes, it seems very out of date from looking at the tracebacks. | 13:00 |
seb128 | james_w: thanks | 13:00 |
marnanel | pochu: part of it is actually written by a script; it has a human editor, though (me) | 13:06 |
Iulian | Hi thekorn, pedro_ | 13:06 |
pedro_ | hello Iulian | 13:06 |
seb128 | james_w: still around? | 13:58 |
seb128 | james_w: any reason nautilus-python still has a python directory under the old nautilus directory? | 13:59 |
james_w | in the source package? | 14:01 |
james_w | ah, I see, I've no idea | 14:02 |
james_w | it's listed in debian/dirs | 14:02 |
james_w | - Create an empty /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/python directory for | 14:03 |
james_w | plugins to be installed into. | 14:03 |
james_w | [debian/dirs] | 14:03 |
james_w | Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org> Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:36:33 | 14:04 |
james_w | I don't see when it moved to the new nautilus-extensions though, do you know when this would have been? | 14:04 |
seb128 | james_w: nautilus 2.21 changed the abi version | 14:05 |
seb128 | james_w: maybe you could fix that too before I sponsor the change? ;-) | 14:06 |
james_w | - Make it work with nautilus 2.22 | 14:06 |
james_w | so I think it was just missed in that update | 14:06 |
seb128 | right | 14:06 |
seb128 | it's not technically required, most users install those in their user directory usually | 14:07 |
james_w | sure, give me 5 minutes to test | 14:08 |
qense | hello | 14:12 |
james_w | seb128: done, thanks | 14:12 |
seb128 | thank you for doing the changes ;-) | 14:12 |
james_w | no problem | 14:13 |
james_w | I'm working on the users-apple fix right now | 14:13 |
seb128 | what is that? | 14:13 |
james_w | -applet sorry | 14:13 |
seb128 | ah | 14:13 |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/198172 | 14:13 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 198172 in gnome-system-tools "[users-admin] Changing anything about the root account sets and invalid home directory" [High,Triaged] | 14:13 |
seb128 | james_w: not sure if it would have make sense to update the dir version rather than drop it? | 14:46 |
james_w | seb128: ah, ok. I thought that the python/ dir was obsolete now, I'll update it | 14:48 |
seb128 | james_w: no, that's just the versioning which changed, ok | 14:48 |
seb128 | pedro_: if you triage bug #209587 be careful it has login informations | 14:56 |
ubotu | Bug 209587 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/209587 is private | 14:56 |
pedro_ | seb128: ok | 14:57 |
afflux | morning | 15:28 |
warren_ | hi | 15:44 |
warren_ | can someone have a look at this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/209578 | 15:45 |
warren_ | quite annoying bug | 15:45 |
warren_ | also very annoying for persons who are now to linux; please fix it :D | 15:45 |
bddebian | Boo | 15:57 |
james_w | jcastro: the other day we were discussing having a way for upstreams to have superpowers for their downstream packages in launchpad. marnanel was interested in doing this, is there an expected timeframe for this feature? | 16:06 |
james_w | Has it been proposed and agreed upon? | 16:06 |
jcastro | james_w: I will talk to bdmurray about it in our call in about an hour, I will let you know asap | 16:07 |
james_w | jcastro: great, thanks | 16:09 |
bdmurray | jcastro: we have a call? | 16:12 |
jcastro | bdmurray: every monday. :D | 16:14 |
bdmurray | jcastro: ;) | 16:14 |
andrea_c7a | Hi everyone. I have committed a patch to fix #201330. It is attached to a comment I left. How do I make it go through to be released ? shall I "Nominate for release" ? | 16:14 |
bdmurray | bug 201330 | 16:15 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 201330 in compiz "Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201330 | 16:15 |
andrea_c7a | exactly | 16:15 |
andrea_c7a | check the last 2 comments | 16:16 |
james_w | andrea_c7a: no, you need to find a sponsor | 16:16 |
james_w | andrea_c7a: putting your patch in a .tar.gz isn't great, as it makes it more work to review | 16:17 |
james_w | umm, and which one is yours? | 16:18 |
bdmurray | I'm changing the status of the bug back to Triaged as the fix has not been commited to the package's source tree. | 16:18 |
james_w | the preferred way to present these is either as a plain patch file, or a debdiff, which is still a patch, but slightly more | 16:18 |
andrea_c7a | the tar.gz is the debian/patches directory. compiz uses the quilt system. I thought the debian/patches was all you need to define a patch | 16:18 |
james_w | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff | 16:18 |
james_w | andrea_c7a: yes, that's fine, it's just not the preferred way to do this. | 16:19 |
james_w | also, you should use "dch" from the devscripts package to update the changelog | 16:20 |
james_w | and don't include the changelog change in the quilt diff, as that will not work | 16:20 |
james_w | andrea_c7a: thanks for writing the patch though. | 16:22 |
james_w | I don't know the usual workflow for the compiz package, but if you upload a new patch that fixes the above we can ask what the next step would be | 16:22 |
andrea_c7a | ok I will try to generate a debdiff and send it again then | 16:24 |
andrea_c7a | once I generated the debdiff it says to "send it to the relevant person" but I can't see who the maintainer of the compiz package is | 16:27 |
andrea_c7a | would that be MOTU-Media ? | 16:28 |
afflux | andrea_c7a: it's ubuntu-main-sponsors, just subscribe them to the bug using "subscribe someone else". Don't forget to attach the debdiff to the bug! | 16:32 |
bdmurray | andrea_c7a: you could ping amaranth or mvo | 16:32 |
afflux | okay, I'll be quiet :) | 16:32 |
afflux | (yeah, bzr is running again!) | 16:33 |
andrea_c7a | ok I'll do that. Thanks very much for your help! | 16:33 |
mvo | andrea_c7a: what bugnumber is that? | 16:35 |
bdmurray | mvo: bug 201330 | 16:35 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 201330 in compiz "Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201330 | 16:35 |
andrea_c7a | yep | 16:37 |
andrea_c7a | mvo: my patch is in the last comment of the bug | 16:38 |
=== warren_ is now known as WarrenD | ||
james_w | hi secretlondon | 16:45 |
secretlondon | hi james_w | 16:46 |
=== WarrenD is now known as WarrenDUM | ||
WarrenDUM | someone know 'mbh' ? | 16:51 |
james_w | WarrenDUM: where from? | 16:58 |
james_w | thanks seb128 | 16:59 |
seb128 | james_w: you are welcome | 16:59 |
pochu | WarrenDUM: Last Seen: 9 weeks 3 days (22h 9m 21s) ago | 16:59 |
james_w | seb128: what's the difference between mime-support and shared-mime-info? | 16:59 |
WarrenDUM | pochu: ?? | 16:59 |
pochu | WarrenDUM: /msg NickServ info mbh | 17:00 |
WarrenDUM | ok | 17:00 |
WarrenDUM | someone knows if he wrote gdebi-kde? | 17:00 |
seb128 | james_w: mime-support is the old mimesystem, I'm wondering if that's not a debian invention, shared-mime-info is the freedesktop specification implementation | 17:01 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: mhb, yes | 17:01 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: what's the problem? | 17:01 |
seb128 | james_w: the modern desktops, etc use the freedesktop datas, mime-support is still used by debian tools, mutt, and likely lot of other non desktopish things | 17:01 |
WarrenDUM | well there's still a huge bug in gdebi-kde | 17:01 |
WarrenDUM | in hardy and gutsy, it can't install any package | 17:01 |
james_w | seb128: ah, ok thanks. I'm looking at bug 201291. I've grabbed shared-mime-info and it seems to have the changes already, so it's no problem it seems. | 17:02 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 201291 in mime-support "Add ogv (video) and oga (audio) as recognized extension for Ogg Theora and Ogg Vorbis, respectively" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201291 | 17:02 |
WarrenDUM | Cannot allocate memory error, but isn't the bug where too much memory is used | 17:02 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: works for me, is that the out of memory issue? | 17:02 |
WarrenDUM | well it is a mem issue but not the same | 17:02 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: right, I have someone working on that | 17:02 |
WarrenDUM | really? | 17:02 |
WarrenDUM | on what problem? | 17:02 |
Riddell | on the embedded konsole widget doing silly things with memory | 17:03 |
WarrenDUM | but it should install? | 17:03 |
WarrenDUM | it doesn't install at all | 17:03 |
WarrenDUM | others are able to install but it simply uses too much memory | 17:03 |
WarrenDUM | my problem is that it doesn't do anything | 17:04 |
Riddell | it should install if it doesn't randomly get memory problems | 17:04 |
WarrenDUM | but i made a bug report | 17:04 |
seb128 | james_w: do you have an example? and what mimetype is displayed in nautilus? | 17:05 |
WarrenDUM | is it possible that it doesn't crash in an english environmentn but crashes in a franch environment? | 17:05 |
WarrenDUM | bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/209578 | 17:05 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 209578 in gdebi "gdebi-kde crashes with an memory allocation error" [Undecided,New] | 17:05 |
james_w | seb128: I don't have an example I'm afraid, but the .xml has all of the entries for audio/ogg etc., which is what needs adding there. | 17:06 |
WarrenDUM | Riddell : aren't you the kde packager? | 17:07 |
seb128 | james_w: right, what I means is that it works correctly for me, this bug doesn't seem to be rightly milestoned, it's a low importance issue and has no concrete example | 17:07 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: I work on Kubuntu | 17:08 |
WarrenDUM | ok | 17:08 |
WarrenDUM | but is my bug related to the other bug? | 17:08 |
james_w | seb128: ah, ok. I guess it just affects things that are still using mime-support. | 17:08 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: yes | 17:08 |
WarrenDUM | ok | 17:08 |
james_w | seb128: or does it affect KDE as well, they've not transitioned to shared-mime-info correct? | 17:09 |
WarrenDUM | so this bug report wasn't needed? | 17:09 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
james_w | Riddell: hi, does KDE use shared-mime-info or mime-support or something else? | 17:09 |
seb128 | james_w: I think all modern desktop used shared-mime-info but I'm not sure | 17:10 |
WarrenDUM | PS: i don't like the new qtcurve theme ^_^ | 17:10 |
WarrenDUM | polyester was nicer :p | 17:10 |
Riddell | james_w: KDE 4 does, KDE 3 not | 17:10 |
james_w | Riddell: ok, thanks, it's still worth updating mime-support. | 17:11 |
WarrenDUM | Riddell: will qtcurve be the default theme for the final release? | 17:13 |
Riddell | WarrenDUM: yes | 17:14 |
WarrenDUM | ow ok :( | 17:14 |
WarrenDUM | ubotwo? :/ | 17:16 |
=== elmargol_ is now known as elmargol | ||
Pres-Gas | james_w, Hey, I talked with you about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/200064 and have gotten some others aware of this report. Would you be considered officially looking at this bug or how does that work? | 17:53 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 200064 in network-manager "the iwl3945 driver will not connect to my open, 802.11 b, linksys AP" [Undecided,New] | 17:54 |
james_w | Pres-Gas: hi | 17:54 |
james_w | I'm not looking at it no, I'm subscribed, but I don't really know enough to tackle it. | 17:54 |
Pres-Gas | Ahhh, okay, that is what I thought, but wanted to trebble check, james_w | 17:55 |
* Pres-Gas is wondering who's door I should be knocking on | 17:55 | |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/190968 | 17:56 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 190968 in linux "[hardy] [regression] iwl3945 doesn't associate on kernel 2.6.24-7" [Medium,Triaged] | 17:56 |
Pres-Gas | Maybe I am not googleing right, but I am not seeing many issues like this... | 17:56 |
james_w | can you verify if that is the same? | 17:56 |
* Pres-Gas is looking now | 17:56 | |
james_w | Pres-Gas: is your AP SSID hidden? | 17:56 |
james_w | ESSID sorry | 17:57 |
Pres-Gas | LOL, no | 17:58 |
Pres-Gas | ...and I did a fresh install in that I parted the drive...so Hardy is not carrying legacy files | 17:59 |
Pres-Gas | Yeah, I may jump in on this one, though since it is triaged | 17:59 |
james_w | the hidden ssid is well known and being worked on, so if yours was that would explain it. | 18:07 |
Pres-Gas | james_w, I wish it was....plus I have other strange AP issues and am afraid it is throwing things off | 18:13 |
Pres-Gas | The thing I DO know is that my AP works okay in 7.10 | 18:13 |
james_w | well, it could well be a driver issue then, due to the change to iwl | 18:19 |
Pres-Gas | That is what I am thinking, but that does not help without facts (log entries, etc.) | 18:21 |
lakin_ | ubuntu-ca | 18:24 |
lakin_ | oops | 18:24 |
lakin_ | :P | 18:24 |
bdmurray | There is supposed to be an update to the iwl drivers shortly | 18:24 |
Pres-Gas | bdmurray, where did you hear that? | 18:29 |
Pres-Gas | That would be wonderful, though | 18:29 |
Pres-Gas | Looked like the iwl drivers themselves are newer than in Ubu | 18:29 |
bdmurray | Pres-Gas: in bug 200509 | 18:29 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 200509 in linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 "iwl4965: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x2000000" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200509 | 18:29 |
bdmurray | and bug 185470 | 18:30 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 185470 in linux "iwl3945 not functioning : microcode error" [Unknown,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185470 | 18:30 |
Pres-Gas | bdmurray, not quite the issue I am having, but here is to hoping that it stumbles onto my issue and fixes it as well. | 18:31 |
bdmurray | james_w: What is the best way to link a bzr branch to a bug? I found the url structure odd | 18:58 |
bdmurray | s/found/find/ | 18:58 |
james_w | bdmurray: dunno, I've never done it, let me have a look | 19:00 |
bdmurray | You can't use the full url like https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/unattended-upgrades/brian-fixes | 19:00 |
bdmurray | Instead you have to remove everything before ~ | 19:00 |
james_w | You'e using "add branch" from the bug? | 19:00 |
james_w | ah, ok | 19:00 |
james_w | so, a branch name has 3 parts, ~owner/project/branch-name | 19:01 |
james_w | so you need to give all three to identify it | 19:01 |
james_w | it's probably worth filing a bug asking for a full URL to be allowed in there | 19:01 |
james_w | at least a code.lp.net/~owner/project/branch one. | 19:02 |
bdmurray | Okay, it seems like people would try to use a full url there but I wasn't sure if it was just me. | 19:02 |
james_w | heh, I read that branch as "brain-fixes" | 19:02 |
james_w | yeah, especially as that's how you do upstream bug links | 19:02 |
bdmurray | I right clicked on a branch at https://code.launchpad.net/unattended-upgrades/+branches to paste in it. | 19:03 |
bdmurray | james_w: Do you know if that would be a malone bug? | 19:04 |
james_w | I think it's probably malone | 19:04 |
james_w | though I don't know | 19:04 |
james_w | they'll at least know where to send it if it isn't | 19:04 |
bdmurray | there is that ;) | 19:04 |
bdmurray | james_w: does bug 113218 look the same as what I am talking about to you? | 19:09 |
ubotwo | Launchpad bug 113218 in launchpad-bazaar "fields for entering a branch should just let you paste a url" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/113218 | 19:09 |
james_w | yeah, but that's a wider issue | 19:11 |
james_w | that's asking for http://wherever/some/branch to be accepted | 19:11 |
james_w | you're just asking to be able to use the full code.lp.net URL rather than just the full branch name | 19:11 |
bdmurray | okay, I'll submit another one then | 19:11 |
james_w | which should be easier for them | 19:11 |
bdmurray | james_w: I've submitted bug 209834 if you are curious | 19:15 |
Pres-Gas | bdmurray and james_w, how long does it take for commits (that backports package) to get to the main apt servers? | 19:15 |
Pres-Gas | What is the turn aroud time | 19:15 |
james_w | Pres-Gas: don't know | 19:17 |
james_w | where's the commit you are talking about? | 19:17 |
Pres-Gas | bdmurray: There is supposed to be an update to the iwl drivers shortly | 19:18 |
bdmurray | Pres-Gas: you could watch https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-backports-modules-2.6.24/ for a new version as it would show up in Launchpad first | 19:19 |
Pres-Gas | By the way, you two are very helpful and userfriendly. Thanks a ton! | 19:20 |
james_w | Pres-Gas: uploads appear to happen on average every one to two weeks | 19:22 |
james_w | the commit was done three days ago and the last upload was more than two weeks ago | 19:22 |
james_w | so I doubt it will be too long | 19:22 |
bdmurray | I'd imagine this week so maybe I shouldn't have said shortly | 19:23 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
Pres-Gas | Shortly in a relative sort of way | 19:27 |
* DOOM_NX helloooo | 19:55 | |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
pochu | jwendell: regarding your Liferea bug, asac meant -0ubuntu3, not ubuntu4. please update the bug report once you update to ubuntu3 :) | 20:04 |
asac | pochu: jwendell: as i wrote in the bug ... that fix will not be effective until next xulrunner is available | 20:05 |
asac | you cannot really verify it right now | 20:05 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
pochu | hmm, right | 20:06 |
pochu | asac: I'm curious, what will the next xulrunner upload change? | 20:06 |
asac | pochu: jwendell: to test you can setup a link libsqlite3.so -> libsqlite3.so.0 | 20:06 |
pochu | ah | 20:06 |
asac | thats all what xulrunner does to help this fix | 20:06 |
asac | pochu: the link is the other way around | 20:06 |
asac | so: ln -s libsqlite3.so libsqlite3.so.0 | 20:06 |
asac | :) | 20:06 |
pochu | do you have an ETA for that upload? :) | 20:06 |
asac | pochu: upstream is about to release beta5 | 20:07 |
asac | we will upload latest by then | 20:08 |
asac | next few days | 20:08 |
pochu | good, thanks | 20:08 |
pochu | I read beta5 will be the last beta, is that true? | 20:09 |
asac | lets hope | 20:09 |
pochu | I guess the download dialog won't change this late... | 20:10 |
asac | nobody knows. i will not push for anything that might slow down the release process at last | 20:11 |
pochu | heh, understandable :) | 20:12 |
pochu | but IMHO the current one is much worse than FF2's one | 20:12 |
warren_ | does someone else experience this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/209578 | 20:13 |
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh | ||
sroecker | can so have a look at Bug 206921 | 20:43 |
james_w | bug 206921 | 20:44 |
james_w | ah, it's not here | 20:45 |
sroecker | the bot? | 20:45 |
james_w | yep | 20:46 |
secretlondon | annoying | 20:47 |
Pres-Gas | That is a nice bot to have. | 20:47 |
secretlondon | not in -announce either | 20:47 |
jussio1 | ubotu died | 20:48 |
jussio1 | wont be back till at least tomorrow | 20:48 |
secretlondon | ah ok | 20:48 |
bdmurray | I thought Seveas was rewriting it | 20:48 |
secretlondon | what happened? | 20:48 |
Seveas | server upgraded to hardy, won't come up after reboot | 20:48 |
jussio1 | upgrade to hardy and the server died... | 20:48 |
Seveas | I guess I have to file some bugs :) | 20:48 |
jussio1 | We can offer a temporary replacement bot if you wish. | 20:49 |
Seveas | it'll be back tomorrow around 10:00 CEST | 20:51 |
Seveas | the world won't die without him | 20:51 |
secretlondon | sure | 20:51 |
secretlondon | thanks for fixing it :) | 20:51 |
james_w | sroecker: mine uses org.freedesktop.PowerManagement.Backlight | 20:54 |
james_w | your's uses org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.LaptopPanel | 20:54 |
sroecker | james_w, does yours work in latest hardy? | 20:54 |
james_w | yep | 20:55 |
james_w | sroecker: reading more I see you understand the problem a little better | 20:55 |
james_w | mine's not a macbook | 20:55 |
sroecker | james_w, ah ok, need a macbook to confirm this | 20:56 |
james_w | sroecker: can you strace it to find out why mmap fails please? | 20:57 |
sroecker | james_w, I don't know, hal calls it somehow | 21:00 |
james_w | strace -f hald | 21:01 |
james_w | It's doing an mmap directly on to the video card memory, which obviously has the potential to go wrong | 21:02 |
sroecker | ah | 21:02 |
james_w | sroecker: http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=blob;h=99c390518fb383485af5e22a501c19c2275f649f;hb=3eac1d8399a7e7d1eb76873c10a29e0fea94ad6c;f=hald/linux/addons/addon-macbook-backlight.c | 21:06 |
james_w | that's the code if you understand any of it | 21:06 |
* DOOM_NX Eimai edw eimai edw, na sou lew alh8eies, na omorfainw tis nuxtes giati apla S'AGAPW. | 21:10 | |
\sh | guys, the archive of the ubuntu-bugs ML is updated the last time in 2007? | 21:19 |
seb128 | \sh: the web interface you mean? the listmasters asked about it and nobody was using the webinterface to read the thousand of bugs the list gets every week | 21:31 |
seb128 | you can still get the mbox for it though I think | 21:32 |
\sh | seb128: ah ... I didn't know... | 21:32 |
seb128 | do you really think there is a need to have a webinterface for that? | 21:32 |
seb128 | all the bugs are in the bug tracker anyway | 21:32 |
bdmurray | I know where to get the mbox if somebody is interested | 21:33 |
\sh | seb128: google search is faster then to search in LP sometimes | 21:34 |
\sh | seb128: I was just wondering .) | 21:35 |
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away | ||
bdmurray | I think there are some other sites that index the bugs mailing list. | 21:35 |
bdmurray | Like http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/ | 21:37 |
Nafallo | hmm | 21:45 |
Nafallo | light is pretty damn fast :-) | 21:45 |
Tuv0k | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audacious/+bug/209924 | 22:01 |
=== blueyed_ is now known as blueyed | ||
* DOOM_NX Mou ekane afierwsh kopela to S'EXW ERWTEUTEI. etsi gia na skasoun kapoies. | 22:25 | |
Ascarel | hey tawmas | 22:38 |
tawmas | hey ascarel | 22:39 |
secretlondon | hi greg_g | 22:56 |
secretlondon | hi greg-g | 22:56 |
bdmurray | hey greg-g | 23:01 |
greg-g | hiya secretlondon bdmurray | 23:13 |
greg-g | bdmurray: do you want people in bugcontrol to give a +1/-1 for applicants (via a private email of course)? | 23:14 |
yuriy | hi bdmurray | 23:18 |
yuriy | bughelper question, i think. how did you go about putting together the bug day page? | 23:19 |
yuriy | for tomorrow | 23:19 |
bdmurray | yuriy: it's quite a mess really | 23:24 |
bdmurray | yuriy: However this one should work for you http://pastebin.osuosl.org/6614 | 23:26 |
bdmurray | Mmm, those bugs should work | 23:26 |
bdmurray | What I mean is that list of bugs was created using the same logic I used for the GNOME bugs | 23:28 |
yuriy | bdmurray: ah, neat! thanks! | 23:35 |
bdmurray | no problem | 23:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!