[00:24] Hiya. I'm installing a samba gutsy-server and the WinXP clients cannot connect as guests. I've manually added the group mappings according to: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#set-group-map - using local unix groups, but I still cannot connect. Ideas? [00:25] BTW, browsing on a gutsy workstation to the server works just fine. [00:25] owh: what's up [00:25] Hiya sommer, pulling out my hair. [00:26] heh, I usually go to the barber [00:26] owh: for the samba question did you set a guest password? [00:27] I don't even know where to start with this samba thing. [00:27] sommer: What do you mean? [00:27] your windows users do they have accounts on your ubuntu box? [00:28] or a guest user with a password? [00:28] also what is your security option set to? [00:29] Security is set to user because at some point in the not to distant future there will be actual user accounts, rather than one single guest account. [00:29] I'm just wondering something. [00:29] does it prompt you for user / pass when you browse to it from the windows machines? [00:29] There needs to be a mapping between a unix account and a local account as specified in smbusers right? [00:29] mralphabet: Yes. [00:30] smbpasswd -a username [00:30] and what user account do you type in? [00:30] mralphabet: Well, initially nothing, then I tried "guest". [00:31] smbusers contains this line: samba = guest pcguest smbguest [00:31] Meaning, the guest account is mapped to the Ubuntu "samba" account. [00:31] This account exists. [00:32] I've locked the password with passwd -l samba, I'm guessing that I should not have :) [00:32] * mralphabet nods [00:32] So, how do I create a guest account that does not let free access into the Ubuntu box. [00:32] Do I set the shell to false? [00:33] owh: that's what I do [00:33] And if that's how its supposed to work, how do I set the guest (samba Ubuntu user) to nothing? [00:35] Ah, passwd -d :) [00:35] * owh crosses fingers and wanders off to a WinXP box :) [00:37] sommer: While I'm waiting for a reboot, is there any reason that the server guide uses /etc/init.d/foo stop as examples, rather than invoke-rc.d foo stop [00:37] owh: you have an init script named after me? Aw, you're so sweet [00:37] foo: Heh. [00:38] : [00:38] ) [00:38] You'll keep :) [00:38] * owh starts contemplating tomorrow. [00:39] owh: not really sure, from my experience /etc/init.d/foo stop is more common :) [00:40] sommer: Fair enough. [00:40] On the samba issue, no change. [00:40] So, there is a samba local Ubuntu user, it is unlocked, login shell set to /bin/false, passwd deleted. Any thing else? [00:42] Is it possible that the WinXP machines are connecting with a username that I'm not expecting, or am I looking down the wrong path? [00:42] owh: is there any errors in /var/log/syslog or /var/log/auth ? [00:42] or any of the samba logs [00:42] owh: AFAIK invoke-rc.d is only intended to be use by package scripts ;) [00:43] JanC: Ah. I just find it less typing: inv[tab] foo [00:43] well, I use 'wajig' ;) [00:43] sommer: Only the ones about creating users and administrators. [00:44] have you tried setting the samba password with smbpasswd ? [00:45] er the user's samba password that is [00:45] sommer: Hmm, for which username? [00:45] sommer: The Ubuntu samba username? [00:45] whichever one you're using guest... I think [00:46] the ubuntu samba user is for the service I believe [00:46] sommer: You might be on to something there. [00:47] * owh goes to check. [00:47] BRB [00:47] Nop [00:48] sommer: The ubuntu "samba" user did not exist. I created it. [00:48] ah, did you then do a smbpasswd -a samba, then try connecting with that user? [00:49] Now I've set the passwd for the user "samba" to null in both Ubuntu and Samba. [00:49] the "-a" adds the user to the samba user database [00:49] maybe I'm confused on what you're trying to do? [00:49] sommer: Should I add a "guest" user? [00:49] Let's start a set back for a moment. [00:49] When I browse in WinXP to a share, which "anonymous" username does it use? [00:49] I think I'm just confusing you as well, heh [00:50] sorry to jump in, but this may be of interest smb.conf: guest account = nobody [00:50] andguent: Yup. I've got that set to guest account = samba [00:50] owh: and you have a system user named samba? [00:51] Yes [00:51] and a samba user named samba? [00:51] Yes [00:51] and the samba user's Samba password is valid? [00:52] as in a valid smbpasswd samba [00:52] sommer: It's set to null with smbpasswd -n samba [00:52] owh: ya, I think it's going to need an actual password [00:52] There is also this mapping in smbusers: samba = guest pcguest smbguest [00:52] sommer: Since when does a guest account need a password? [00:52] what is the security = ? [00:53] users [00:53] I think for the guest it needs to be security = share [00:53] Hmm, I'm just noticing that this is commented out. I wonder what the default is. [00:53] owh: users [00:54] but if your goal is to not have a prompt then you'll need to set it to share [00:54] So, can I create a passwordless guest account in a "user" environment? Ultimately we'll need to move to that. [00:54] owh: that I'm not 100% sure of, but I don't think so [00:54] We're working on migrating them all to a SOE. [00:55] when you want to migrate you'll just need to create the users and set the security to users [00:55] sommer: So, if I login as "guest" on the WinXP box with no password, then it should work? [00:55] That is, the mapping in smbusers maps guest to samba which then connects, right? [00:55] owh: that's I'm not sure of, but it's worth a try [00:56] It doesn't work. [00:56] did you try security = share? [00:56] sommer: No because then the users that do have an account will have issues. [00:56] owh: ah, true [00:56] sommer: This is a setup that has been borked by many previous admins. I'm trying to start from scratch. [00:57] so you want some shares to prompt for a password and others to not? [00:57] sommer: Yes. [00:57] sommer: But it's simpler than that. [00:58] sommer: The only ones that prompt are home directories. [00:58] Let me ask a different question. [00:58] then I think there are options for the share definitions that can enable that [00:58] When I browse the network under Ubuntu Workstation and connect to the server I am not prompted for a password. [00:59] is that on the server itself? [00:59] No, from my laptop. [01:00] So, there is a guest mechanism working. [01:01] And it shows me connecting as the "samba" user in the log for that machine. [01:01] Does WinXP have a different "magic" guest username? [01:03] i can stop butting in, but I like this type of share setup: [Shared]; path =/opt/samba/shared; writable = yes; guest ok = yes; create mask = 777; directory mask = 777; force user = nobody [01:04] that sounds reasonable to me [01:04] what andguent said anyway [01:04] andguent: Feel free to continue to butt in :) [01:04] that of course, would give wide open perms to that share, and make any new file saved there have wide open security, only recommended for non confidential info [01:04] andguent: definitely feel free to, I'm sort of running out of ideas :-) [01:05] Hmm, I wonder if the "force user" is required. [01:05] maybe not, but it will make things easier for authentication [01:05] Lemmie try that for a mo. [01:05] if you want an area for important secured info, make another share with different perms [01:06] recommended for that setup: valid users = larry, moe, curly [01:07] or: valid users = @threestoges [01:07] Yeah, that's the next step, but today we just want to recreate the environment that the company had on Friday :) [01:08] yup yup [01:08] So, the force user=samba didn't work. [01:08] * owh checks logs [01:08] No change. [01:08] i assume you already have guest ok = yes [01:09] on that share [01:09] * owh checks to make sure. [01:09] [Accounts] [01:09] path = /home/samba/Accounts [01:09] writeable = yes [01:09] guest ok = yes [01:09] force user = samba [01:09] That's all there is. [01:10] what are the permissions on that directory? ls -lah /home/samba/Accounts [01:10] Owned and operated by the user samba. [01:13] Hmm, I wonder if it has to do with WINS support? [01:13] can you dump the output of these commands to http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/ ---- ls -lah /home/samba/Accounts; cat /etc/samba/smb.conf; cat /etc/passwd; cat /etc/group; pdbedit -L [01:13] andguent: I can give you the Accounts directory itself, not its content. [01:14] thats fine [01:14] cut out what you want [01:20] andguent: http://ubuntu.pastebin.com/m135ac5d4 [01:24] Hello: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/32067 [01:24] i dont think its a big deal, but i'm grasping at straws too, it all looks fine..... can you change /bin/false to /bin/bash temporarily? [01:24] Launchpad bug 32067 in samba "public Samba SMB shares cannot be accessed anonymously from Windows XP, a password prompt appears" [High,Fix released] [01:26] map to guest = Bad User [01:27] That seems to be the fix for some reason. [01:27] got it working then? [01:28] Not yet, still reading, but that looks like the fix from that bug report. I'm going to reload samba shortly. [01:29] * owh crosses fingers [01:30] Well, under Nautilus I can no longer access the shares. [01:30] * owh tries WinXP clients next. [01:31] Nope, "the user does not exist" [01:31] Hmm [01:31] Let me try map to guest = samba [01:37] No, but my logs are filling with: sid_to_uid for samba (S-1-5-21-2317322771-484201766-2685857054-501) failed [01:38] # net groupmap list [01:38] Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2317322771-484201766-2685857054-512) -> administrator [01:38] Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-2317322771-484201766-2685857054-514) -> samba [01:38] Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2317322771-484201766-2685857054-513) -> staff [01:38] Crap, why is this so hard? [01:42] still stewing it over..... you aren't using smbldap are you? [01:43] No [01:43] tdbsam [01:46] how many times have you tried deleting the samba user in tdb via smbpasswd -x and then remaking? [01:47] Never, but I'm just thinking that the force user is when it went to pot. I'm going to remove that and leave the Bad User mapping. [01:47] go for it [01:47] Nautilus is working again. XP is next. [01:47] BRB [01:47] i dont have any XP computers to test with right now, otherwise I would try it from here [01:49] Whoot! [01:49] We have lift off. [01:49] Ok, so guest mapping needs to map to a bad user and force user should not be there. [01:50] When I'm back in the office I'll see what hardy does by default, but soren was already involved in the bug I mentioned, so I'm hoping this has been addressed :) [01:51] sommer: andguent: mralphabet: Thank you all for your assistance. [01:51] * owh goes to test printing :) [01:51] np, i just wish i knew how i did it before, its definitely possible [01:51] It would be great if my VPN connection worked from the office, then I could test this before coming on-site :) [01:52] andguent: Yeah, it's all working now as expected. I'll contact the authenticated users and make sure that they work as expected. [01:52] one difference, I usually do not have low security in a domain master setup [01:52] I'm not yet sure that I need the groupmap. [01:53] andguent: And as soon as we have moved the environment the way it needs to be then that will change and the guest account will give you access to the Transfer volume :) [01:54] Thanks again. [01:54] no prob, good luck, just know that it is possible :) [01:57] Yeah [01:57] Should I delete the group mappings? [01:58] it shouldn't matter tooo much, if you know how to recreate the mappings, sometimes its nice to reset settings :) [01:59] Well, my first thought was that the installer should have taken care of them and because it didn't they were not required. The samba manual talks about them previously being created by default, but that they now need to be manually created, so I'm confused as to what really should happen. [02:00] I don't even know if they're needed for actual operation. [02:00] I'm assuming you want to use a domain setup in the long term? [02:00] Yes [02:01] That makes me think, remove them now while I remember, then when we do this for real, create them properly. [02:02] I mapped them to administrator, staff, samba arbitrarily. [02:02] Though I think if they're required that it would be good if the installer did this. [02:02] I have a similar setup to what you currently are going for in the short term, no domain master, and net groupmap list is empty, just as an FYI [02:03] i used to have access to 30-40 different servers, so many samples to work from, i miss them greatly now :) [02:03] I think I'll delete them for now. [02:03] VMware is your friend :) [02:03] definitely [02:04] i just don't have those sample configs in front of me anymore, harder to remember everything off the top of my head [02:05] Hey, don't feel too bad, your probing caused me to seek further and find a solution. [02:05] Now I have to figure out why LAMP out of the box is serving php pages as text. [02:06] that is odd [02:07] Yup, I'll say. [02:07] The mime-type mappings seem to be there. [02:08] owh: I'd double check that the php modules is enabled and restart apache [02:10] sommer: Nope, but disabling it and re-enabling it and force-reloading in between fixed it. Mine is not to ask :( [02:11] wierd... [02:15] sommer: That sums up the last 48 pretty well :( [02:15] 300Gb of data with only 40Gb of real stuff. The rest left lying around by previous administrators just for fits and giggles. [02:17] heh [02:17] And of course all of it was being backed up each day :( [02:18] At least the current disks will handle the load when the organisation ever grows that big :) [02:25] ha, yea, time for a good nas/offline storage system [02:25] shove the stuff out of the way and get on with things [02:27] * owh is working on it :) [02:28] Isn't the ctrl-alt-del detection in /etc/inittab? [02:29] working on keeping your windows admins from rebooting the server at the console? :) [02:30] Yup [02:30] I don't seem to have an inittab. [02:30] WTF is going on? [02:32] Hmm. /etc/event.* [02:33] yea, /etc/event.d/control-alt-delete [02:33] Yeah, I was just in the process of adding that as a comment here for future googlers :) [02:34] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2181001 [02:34] Well, that just about concludes my pain for this location. Thanks andguent :) [02:35] no prob, good luck === alan_m is now known as paultag|afk === paultag|afk is now known as Alan_M [05:00] I'm making a generic user backup script. Anyone see any issues with this: http://ubuntu.pastebin.com/d75014df5 [05:00] The idea is that you symlink to it with each username from cron.daily. [05:03] * owh realises that the script is pretty trivial. I'm using the same mechanism to backup drives. [05:03] s/drives/mount points/ [05:09] hello. may I ask how to remove webmin? [05:10] How did you install it? [05:10] mmm.. manual I guess... webmin is not in the repo right? [05:10] rhineheart_m: It was terminated with extreme predjudice. [05:10] so, I believe I installed it manually.. [05:10] rhineheart_m: Didn't you ask this same question recently. [05:11] The webmin web site (IIRC) provides .debs for it. [05:11] nope. I asked but nobody answered as far as I could remember [05:11] rhineheart_m: So, yes you did ask :) [05:12] :). Okay. Nope there I meant I asked but I didn't receive a good answer [05:12] rhineheart_m: Again, how did you install it? [05:15] owh, a minute.. m trying to figure out how did I manage to install it [05:17] Basically, depending on how you installed it, determines how you remove it. [05:20] I guess I installed it via wget.. and sudo sh setup.sh [05:21] rhineheart_m: Then you'll need to look for the uninstall script included in the package. [05:21] uninstall script? where to find it owh ? [05:23] rhineheart_m: I don't understand the question. If you installed an application, then it would come with an uninstall script. If not, it should come with an install.log, if not, then you may have success re-installing it and looking for the logs, but as I've never installed things that are not packages - which you should also never do, that's all I have. [05:24] owh, I found this one: uninstall.sh in /etc/webmin directory.. what do you think? [05:24] rhineheart_m: I'd look at it before running it. [05:25] uhuh... are you trying to tell me to read the script first before running it? [05:25] Yes [05:26] rhineheart_m: Unless of course you have a full system backup in which case it won't matter if the uninstall script hoses your system. [05:26] uhuh.. this it the content... http://www.pastebin.org/26398 [05:26] *is [05:28] I just tried to execute: /etc/webmin/stop and it returned stopping...well, can you suggest heading/? [05:30] rhineheart_m: I do not know what this means: "well, can you suggest heading/?" [05:31] owh, I mean.. will I go with this steps: cd ~ ; cd /etc/webmin ; sudo sh uninstall.sh ? [05:33] rhineheart_m: I cannot answer that. There is a serious question about liability here. If I were to say yes and you hose your system, there is an implied idea that I'm then going to help you recover your machine. That is not the case. All I can say is: "Did you backup your system first?" [05:33] rhineheart_m: I should point out that: [05:33] rhineheart_m: This is only the case because you're not using a package that comes from Ubuntu. If it did, then the liability issue becomes even more muddied :) [05:34] rhineheart_m: Personally, I'd investigate what the .pl script does and see if you think it's playing in places that it should not. [05:34] rhineheart_m: As this is a server channel, I need to assume that you're doing this on a server. [05:35] rhineheart_m: So, I'm saying - I don't know. It shouldn't hurt, but I'm not going to tell you that it will not hurt. [05:35] rhineheart_m: Do you understand what I'm saying? [05:36] uhuh.. okay.. this is the case actually.. I just don't know if you've heard this... when I will open the port for webmin.. and will access and using it.. I experienced intermittent connection and I don't know for what reason. I've been observing the performance. For the past 3 days and blocked that port.. and I didn't experience anymore disruption of internet connection.. [05:37] owh, yeah.. the server is live and two sites are hosted there.. :( [05:37] rhineheart_m: This is the same computer we spoke about a few days ago with the ADSL issue? [05:37] owh, yeah.. this is it! [05:38] rhineheart_m: Then you need to do some serious troubleshooting. It is possible that someone has been using webmin to hack your server, but I cannot answer that. You need to determine what is causing the issue. Do the disconnects happen if the server is not connected etc. As I see it, you're just flailing in the dark at the moment. [05:38] and based on my investigation.. webmin causing the problem.. mmm.. or might be.. something is wrong with the network that can't handle https requests. It could handle for the few minutes but later it can't [05:39] rhineheart_m: Or some script kiddie is running something that connects to webmin and reboots your router - who knows. Unless you investigate you'll not know the answer. [05:39] I have logs.. and only me (IP) is accessing the port for webmin [05:40] rhineheart_m: What about network sniffing logs? [05:40] network sniffing logs? lemme ask you. is incoming tables not reliable to log incoming requests? [05:40] rhineheart_m: Before all that I'd eliminate simple things. You told us on a previous occasion that the Windows machines are also disconnected. This is more likely a router issue or an ADSL issue. [05:41] rhineheart_m: Making things more complicated by looking for things that no-one ever heard of are unlikely to solve your problem. [05:42] rhineheart_m: I'm not saying the cause is not webmin, just that it is very far down the list of possible causes of intermittent network connectivity for a LAN. [05:42] rhineheart_m: Fundamentally you need to eliminate each failure point, one at a time. [05:43] rhineheart_m: So, connect a single Windows computer to the ADSL modem. Does it continue to work? [05:43] rhineheart_m: Then connect that same machine to the router and the router to the modem, does it continue to work? [05:43] but for the past almost a month.. tell me why I've been experiencing intermittent connection when webmin is being used? I just used it to transfer/edit some files using its file manager. [05:44] presently.. I've been doing the same transfer of files using winscp and I didn't experience such.. [05:44] rhineheart_m: Well, you also said that the Windows computers on the same network fail intermittently. At the same time, or at a different time? Is their failure related to your failure, or are there more than one issue? [05:44] for the past 3 days.. never the internet connection suffered the same problem which was actually not usuall for the past few weeks [05:45] rhineheart_m: You cannot just wave your hands around and point at the last thing you touched. You'll never discover the problem. [05:45] rhineheart_m: I understand that you are frustrated, but I suggest you read through the steps I've listed and proceed one step at a time. [05:46] owh, this is what I see it... adsl and the ISP looses its sync (PPPoE) when I'm using https or maybe webmin.. [05:47] rhineheart_m: That has very likely nothing to do with https. Losing sync is a layer 2 issue, not able to be influenced by what traffic occurs. [05:49] rhineheart_m: Most modems will show you what link quality there is. Perhaps you need to look at that first. [05:49] BTW, I'm still waiting for the replacement of wrt54g since I believe of its faulty https . Sorry to tell you.. I haven't told you before.. I just forgot [05:49] rhineheart_m: I also don't know how the ADSL filters are connected, nor other devices on the telephone network. [05:49] it only defaults to port 143 [05:50] rhineheart_m: The problem you are solving does in my opinion have nothing to do with TCP/UDP/HTTP/HTTPS/IP or any "high-level" information. This is a physical link problem from what you have told me. [05:51] rhineheart_m: The most often diagnosed problem is that the ADSL filter is incorrectly fitted. [05:51] ok so is there any downside to making dns entry for us.archive.ubuntu.com if I have an apt-get mirror that is local on my network for the different versions of ubuntu I am normally dealing with? [05:52] owh, I have it checked already by our ISP techs. In fact, they changed the cabling system ( I mean.. the analog line) already [05:54] rhineheart_m: The second most often diagnosed problem is that there are poor internal leads. [05:54] So I guess. the problem is not more on physical set-up ... but something otherwise. [05:54] rhineheart_m: What you are describing does not ring true. [05:54] rhineheart_m: Loosing sync is an ADSL level issue, not a IP level issue. [05:55] if it is more on physical coonection..now.. why is it loses its connectivity when I am connecting to the box and doing some revisions to the live site? [05:55] rhineheart_m: I could dream up a scenario where your machine has been hacked and each https connect causes a script to reboot your modem, but I don't buy it. [05:56] rhineheart_m: Perhaps because there is more traffic moving in the opposite direction. [05:57] I tried chkrootkit output I didn't see any problem [05:58] rhineheart_m: Again, you're looking at higher level issues. [05:58] rhineheart_m: Give me a moment while I chew some lunch. [05:58] or again you might see.. something in the windows machine causes the problem (like it would reboot the adsl modem) [05:59] chew some lunch? from where you're from? it is lunch time here too [05:59] AU [05:59] okay.. I believe same time here.. :) [06:00] Right. Food swallowed. [06:00] Here beginneth the lesson. [06:01] Information is shared across a network using technology. At the lowest level we have the electrons, then above that we have several layers until we get to the top where we send email and IRC around the net. With me so far? [06:02] * owh won't continue until you've understood what I wrote rhineheart_m [06:03] I'm not trying to be an ass, I'm trying to explain the problem you're seeing and describing. [06:04] owh, thank you for that info. I'm into it.. [06:04] rhineheart_m: So, you understood that last paragraph? [06:05] yeah.. that's clear [06:05] troubleshooting should start from the very first level.. [06:06] and you are telling me that it should start with the most basic possible causes.. not jumping on the higher ones... [06:06] rhineheart_m: So, if the electrons are not flowing, then no matter how much diagnosing you do at the email level, is the address right, was the mail server configured properly, did I get the password right are all irrelevant because there are no electrons. [06:06] rhineheart_m: Yes. you start at level 1 and work your way up. [06:07] rhineheart_m: So, in your case, you have electrons flowing. But then it breaks for a bit sometimes. [06:07] plainly.. that's going to be more on physical connection FIRST.. but I guess.. I exerted most of my efforts on that very side already.. [06:07] rhineheart_m: So, the first thing to check at that level is what exactly is happening. [06:08] rhineheart_m: Well not enough in my opinion. The fact that you are loosing sync cannot reasonably be described by rogue software that responds to https packets. It's possible - everything is possible - but it's unlikely. [06:08] mmm.. not unless that's the highest level a nurse could do [06:09] rhineheart_m: It would be a little more likely if your modem and your router were the same device. But they are not. [06:09] rhineheart_m: Why is the PPPoE client running on the router and not on the modem? [06:09] yeah.. they are not.. the modem has its routing capabilities.. why should I not use it instead....what do you think? [06:10] what are you trying to say? the PPPoE is in the ADSL..the router just did the dialing.. is it not that better set-up? [06:11] rhineheart_m: This is really only a red-herring. Loosing a PPPoE connection is a higher level activity than losing ADSL sync. If the sync isn't working then the PPPoE won't, but not vice versa. [06:12] * owh has seen too many ISPs with no clue and has little faith in their ability to diagnose sometimes very obvious problems. [06:13] rhineheart_m: Is there a central ADSL filter in the building? [06:13] rhineheart_m: Does the ADSL line share any facilities with *ANY* other devices, like faxes, eftpos machines, phones, etc.? [06:14] owh, how I wish I could talk with you longer... I still have duty in the hospital minutes from now.. see you later. [06:15] owh, well for that.. I have fax machine connecting to the same line [06:15] rhineheart_m: The ADSL filter needs to have the fax on the filtered outlet and the modem on the unfiltered outlet. [06:15] Yeah.. I have that.. microfilter thing [06:16] rhineheart_m: How many outlets does it have? [06:16] and as far as I know.. it is set-up correctly [06:16] rhineheart_m: That was not my question. [06:16] * owh assumes everyone is an idiot and lies until proven otherwise :) [06:16] 3. one from the line. the other is for the modem. the the last one is for the phone [06:17] rhineheart_m: Have you personally looked at the filter and seen how it is connected? [06:17] yeah. I did it.. [06:18] rhineheart_m: Have you removed the filter and the fax and only connected the modem directly to the wall? [06:18] mmm.. not yet.. I know where are you heading at.. :) [06:19] rhineheart_m: Also, is that line a shared line, or does it come from the street straight to your wall socket? [06:19] nope.. a dedicated line. since it is a business line [06:19] rhineheart_m: One step at a time you need to eliminate the assumptions you have made. Why? Because it's not working. [06:19] rhineheart_m: What about the actual cabling in the building? [06:20] rhineheart_m: Also, while an ADSL filter is simple, it can fail. [06:20] owh, as I said earlier.. it has been changed already [06:20] rhineheart_m: That doesn't mean that it is not faulty. [06:21] rhineheart_m: You can test that by removing it and the fax and connecting the modem directly. [06:21] owh, I better leave now.. or else I will be late in my duty.. Yeah.. I will do that. thanks anyway... [06:21] rhineheart_m: Other causes are incorrect, long, or faulty phone wires. A borked modem. Etc. [06:21] rhineheart_m: Have fun. [06:22] but the ISP had changed the modem already as requested.. [06:22] :) [06:22] * owh assumes everyone is an idiot and lies until proven otherwise :) [06:24] hahahaha.. nice.. :) [07:02] <_ruben> mornin [07:10] * owh looks over shoulder. _ruben, where, I don't see any mornin? [07:10] :) [07:11] <_ruben> stupid DST makes it feel like night overhere anyways :p [07:13] _ruben: We've just come out of that 34 hours ago :) Now the #u-s meeting is at 5am :) === \sh_away is now known as \sh [08:29] i'm installing game known as urban terror. it's in file.tar.gz. where do i have to extract in ubuntu gutsy file system so all user can use it.. regards. [08:33] <_ruben> hari: i'd go for /usr/local/urbanterror/ [08:36] is it a good idea to use a server for desktop use also. (linux)? [08:40] @_ruben : ownernya khan root:root om.. bisa ya diakses oleh user lain..? atau bagaimana diekstrak begitu saja? [08:40] sorry @_ruben.. [08:40] so just extract it to /usr/local/urbanterror/ [08:42] then all user should be abel to use it, is it right? [08:43] <_ruben> hari: i wouldnt know what it'd take for that game to be playable .. atleast it should be accessable for all local users [08:44] <_ruben> troofy: the server kernel isnt tuned for interactive use, but for server use .. so might not be optimal .. what would be idea of using server instead of desktop? [08:44] thx.. i wil try [08:45] _ruben i have one pc. i have to make it server and use it as desktop [08:45] <_ruben> i'd go for the version which you'd use most .. desktop if you use it as desktop primarily and also as server .. or server if its server primarily and also used as desktop occasionally [08:47] hm [09:12] Hi, when i plug in NIC number three in my linux server, it should just start working right away yes? [09:13] moin [09:13] moin [09:18] tmadsen: Yes. [09:21] <_ruben> unless the hardware isnt supported (too new, too old, etc) [09:29] the hardware is not, is there a nice command that fetches drivers and whatnot? [09:30] The hardware is not what? [09:41] supported [09:42] why is alsa part of the server? [09:44] <_ruben> that was part of a debate not too long ago .. had smth to do with hardware detection i think .. didnt follow the complete discusion .. but i think its planned for removal in future version(s) [10:03] tmadsen: Er... Well, if the hardware isn't supported then, no, sticking it in your server will not make it work right away.. [10:04] _ruben: Why remove alsa from servers? [10:06] <_ruben> soren: it was a discussion in this very channel a while ago .. having sound stuff on a server seems not-logical [10:06] telephony servers? [10:07] <_ruben> soren: well .. it wasnt about removing alsa completely .. but having alsa-base installed by default seems a bit odd .. for telephony servers (or any other service depending on also) all packages could be pulled in when need i think ? [10:09] Oh, the userspace stuff? Right, yes, that rings a bell. [10:09] I think we've already removed that now for hardy. [10:26] <_ruben> hmm .. wonder if there's a cmdline tool to "analyze" vob files .. wondering if my downloaded dvds do have the subtitles i wanted :p [10:30] i have a dsl connection. but my friends share it with me. i think giving them line from modem is not good idea, as i cant limit their speed. i run ircd + host my web. should i use a third computer as router and server or use my one pc as router to limit there bandwidth + as server? [10:33] <_ruben> Tootbatot_: i'd go for a dedicated machine .. but thats just me [10:33] a machine router? [10:33] <_ruben> hmmm .. wonder if canonical will be providing vmware server 1.0.5 on their partner repo [10:34] <_ruben> Tootbatot_: hardware router .. linux based router .. depends on the avail hardware and all [10:34] what should be alternative.. [10:34] _ruben: It's not really up to us. It's up to VMWare. You should ask them. [10:35] _ruben what should be alternative.. [10:35] <_ruben> soren: ah, the package is provided by vmware ? [10:36] <_ruben> Tootbatot_: not sure what you mean? [10:36] _ruben if i dont want to purchase a new pc to be as router [10:39] Tootbatot_: how do you feel about purchasing some new cisco kit? [10:39] Deeps how much will it cost . like an old p2? [10:40] depends on what you buy [10:40] i want to make up with one pc [10:40] that does it all. i have p4 1.8g [10:40] 1g ram [10:43] _ruben: I'm not sure who exactly makes the package, but its availability is up to VMWare. [10:53] <_ruben> soren: ic [10:54] _ruben if i dont want to purchase a new pc to be as router [10:56] <_ruben> Tootbatot_: well .. you *could* use your computer as desktop + server + router .. nothing wrong with that when you're low on hardware .. tho usualy old pcs (like p2/p3) can be bought for cheap or even picked up for free [10:56] _ruben for free? [10:57] _ruben whats wrong with making one pc do all that? [10:58] you're more or less ok if you use 1 machine as a server + router in a home environment [10:58] just remember that if you do anything on it that requires a reboot, everyone loses their net connection [10:59] Deeps what things require reboots. i use it as desktop too. [10:59] using it as a desktop as well is even less than ideal, as due to the way people tend to use desktop computers, the machine would be less stable than would be appreciated by everyone eles trying to use the net [10:59] i dont know, i dont use linux on the desktop [10:59] and what chances are there if it gets held. and do not respond. ill have to reboot. [10:59] ok [11:18] can i limit total bandwidth /s combinely for 2 ips ? by firewall. eg ip1 + ip2 should not exceed 20kb/s ? [11:23] hi, when i connect to my samba server it is slow to give the auth window, after auth everything is fast, i think it has to do with the server being in another subnet [11:23] can i limit total bandwidth /s combinely for 2 ips ? by firewall. eg ip1 + ip2 should not exceed 20kb/s ? [11:23]