[06:10] <BHSPitMonkey> haha
[06:10] <BHSPitMonkey> I like the hardy incoming art submission for a wallpaper
[06:10] <BHSPitMonkey> that's just the gutsy wallpaper desaturated
[06:10] <BHSPitMonkey> priceless
[15:22] <psyke83> kwwii, I noticed Daniel Sargeant has uploaded a color chooser version of Human-Murrine as well, will you be going with that version instead of mine?
[15:22] <psyke83> kwwii, that theme still has hardcoded values and issues with Firefox, unfortunately
[15:27] <kwwii> psyke83: actually, we will be going with ubuntulooks again
[15:27] <psyke83> ok
[15:27] <kwwii> I just removed murrine from the dependencies
[15:27] <kwwii> and added your gtkrc for ubuntuloooks
[15:28] <_MMA_> Boo.... Ubuntu suX0rz.
[15:29] <kwwii> _MMA_: well, if you would have only worked a bit harder on it maybe we could have finally got ahead this time
[15:29] <kwwii> :p
[15:29] <_MMA_> No. The issue is management. "Higher-ups"
[15:29] <_MMA_> Oh well.
[15:30] <kwwii> actually, I agree that ubuntulooks still has nicer progress bars and scrollbars
[15:34] <psyke83> kwwii, so we're not keeping the murrine theme as an alternative, even?
[15:34] <kwwii> psyke83: we cannot keep it due to the size of the CD
[15:35] <_MMA_> Really, Murrine the engine should be a recommend on ubuntu-desktop anyway.
[15:35] <psyke83> ah that's fine, then... I was just confused to see someone else upload a different color chooser version to the bzr, it seems like duplicated effort
[15:35] <kwwii> hehe
[15:35] <_MMA_> psyke83: It's ok. Your work will be seen and is appreciated in Ubuntu Studio. :P
[15:37] <psyke83> _MMA_, ;) it's not a prob, I was just wondering why... the old theme has issues with Firefox and so does the new one, it seems like a step back... but if it won't get used, who cares :P
[15:37] <_MMA_> I'm just jabbin' at Ken. ;)
[15:37] <psyke83> the toolbar seems to be missing a horizontal line below the buttons
[15:52] <_MMA_> kwwii: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Elegant+Blankon?content=78134&PHPSESSID=8dc2bb4f15bdd27deb50b2bb98a1f1ae
[15:53] <_MMA_> Or, the unmodded theme screenshots: http://www.blankonlinux.or.id/screenshot.html
[15:57] <kwwii> not bad, perhaps a bit too simple but very interesting
[15:58] <kwwii> ok, so today I updated the human-icon-theme, human-theme, ubuntulooks, and ubuntu-artwork packages
[15:58] <kwwii> so expect a couple of changes ;-)
[16:28] <cody-somerville> \o/
[17:43] <TomaszD> hi, is the welcome html page of Ubuntu part of ubuntu-artwork package?
[17:47] <cody-somerville> no
[17:48] <TomaszD> cody-somerville, where can I find the template for this page in lp?
[17:48] <TomaszD> dpkg -S doesn't seem to associate the file with any package
[17:48] <cody-somerville> ubuntu-doc I believe
[17:48] <TomaszD> hmm
[18:02] <TomaszD> cody-somerville, kubuntu-docs-index exists, but ubuntu-docs-index is missing
[18:02] <TomaszD> :(
[18:02] <cody-somerville> Ask in #ubuntu-doc
[18:03] <TomaszD> cody-somerville, ok
[20:37] <savvas> hm..
[20:37] <savvas> I think my message didn't reach the ubuntu-art list
[20:39] <savvas> hm it must be the attachment
[20:40] <nothlit> are you subscribed?
[20:40] <nothlit> otherwise kwwii has to go approve it as not spam or something i think
[20:41] <savvas> i am, but i don't know what's the attachment limit
[20:42] <nothlit> i would keep it under 7.6 megs i think
[20:42] <savvas> kwwii: can you check emails sent by vicedar at gmail dot com yesterday?
[20:42] <nothlit> theres like overhead, if you go over that it creeps over 10
[20:42] <savvas> it was 13kb :(
[20:42] <nothlit> that should be fine
[20:42] <nothlit> people have sent full size png wallpapers before
[20:43] <savvas> think I should resend?
[20:43] <savvas> it was about a suggest of mine about the new bittorrent icon
[20:43] <savvas> *suggestion
[20:45] <savvas> I'll try once more
[20:48] <savvas> 'ere we go :)
[20:49] <savvas> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2008-April/005594.html
[20:49] <savvas> :)
[21:21] <kwwii> savvas: that should go in the gnome icon theme right?
[21:22] <savvas> kwwii: well if the license and everything is right, I'd be honoured :)
[21:23] <kwwii> savvas: andreasn would be the right person to talk to about including it upstream in the gnome icon theme
[21:23] <kwwii> savvas: for hardy I will put it in our version of the gnome theme
[21:23] <savvas> cool :)
[22:10] <andreasn> savvas: was it you who filed that bug against gnome-icon-theme in gnome bugzilla?
[22:21] <crimeboy> hi
[22:22] <crimeboy> someone have a font sackers gothic light?
[22:22] <crimeboy> or similar free
[22:27] <andreasn> crimeboy: no, sorry
[22:36] <troy_s> crimeboy: You have obviously checked out dafont and abstractfonts yes?
[23:04] <crimeboy> troy_s: and all rest of internet
[23:05] <troy_s> crimeboy: Use whatsmyfont to find a kin to it
[23:05] <crimeboy> font.com have it
[23:05] <crimeboy> but
[23:05] <crimeboy> 29$ us
[23:06] <troy_s> crimeboy: As I said, use whatsmyfont to find a font that is almost identical in the free capacity.
[23:06] <troy_s> crimeboy: What is sackers offering over the thousands of other light gothics out there?
[23:06] <crimeboy> is a font of a logo done
[23:07] <crimeboy> but, thank u anyway
[23:07] <troy_s> crimeboy: Did you try whatsmyfont?
[23:08] <troy_s> crimeboy: As I said, in many instances, it will pull up several in the same class / breed.