=== secretlondo is now known as secretlondon [00:38] Hello, I'm trying to identify a bug. When I go: System --> Administration --> Network Tools and then select the "Lookup" tab I enter the IP address for my ubuntu machine. Nothing is returned from the query. Can someone help? [00:38] * DOOM_NX auto to 'diafanes-perituligma-me-tis-fouskales-pou-kanoun-tsoukou-tsoukou-kai-ka8ontai-oloi-kai-tis-spane-san-upnwtismenoi', 3erei kaneis pws legetai me mia le3h? [00:40] hrlr: which release of Ubuntu are you using? [00:41] Hardy [00:41] bdmurray: Hardy [00:42] bdmurray: My router is also not returning a hostname for my ubuntu system. Something's fishy. [00:44] Hi, everybody, I'm still new around here and I could use some guidance... Think I've nailed this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netbase/+bug/209087 and I think it's filed against the wrong package. I have what looks like the same bug and I have a workaround. [00:45] I hope this is the proper place to get some help :-) Please, crucify me if I'm wrong [00:45] tawmas: you're not wrong at all, this is exactly the right place [00:46] james_w: k, fine! [00:46] tawmas: what package do you think it applies to? [00:46] hrlr: I'm not positive but I think that applet queries your dns server so wouldn't look in '/etc/hosts' [00:47] james_w: network-manager-applet or network-config (sorry, I had the right name for the latter yesterday I need to look it up again) [00:48] hrlr: do you have a dns server under your control? [00:48] james_w: when you switch from roaming mode to manual configuration, it's writing a blank link in /etc/network/interfaces where there should be an auto [00:49] manually editing the file and restarting networking does the trick [00:49] bdmurray: No. But I'm able to see other computers on my network by using this technique. It shows their hostnames and information. [00:50] tawmas: I've not heard of network-config, but it sounds like it might well be it's fault. [00:50] bdmurray: I wish I had Gutsy installed so I could compare. I'm almost positive that it worked in Gutsy. [00:50] tawmas: how do you switch to and from roaming mode? [00:50] hrlr: I have a gutsy system around and can check it out [00:51] bdmurray: Really? That would be awesome! [00:51] Hey guys [00:51] I'm a gutsy right now [00:51] if you need me to check something [00:51] james_w: just looked it up, the name is network-config. I click on the n-m applet icon and the select manual configuration from the dropdown [00:52] jlpraise: When I go: System --> Administration --> Network Tools and then select the "Lookup" tab I enter the IP address for my ubuntu machine. Nothing is returned from the query. Can you test this on Gutsy? [00:52] sure I'll try it now [00:52] tawmas: then what? I can try it now [00:53] tawmas: are you on Hardy? [00:53] tawmas: do you mean network-admin? [00:53] james_w: yep, that could be [00:54] tawmas: it's source package is "gnome-system-tools", you should probably reassign it there. Do you know how to do that? [00:54] jlparise: By "my ubuntu machine" I mean 192.168.1.104 [00:54] jlparise: So whatever your local address is. [00:54] I am rtying to remember hwo to get my IP [00:55] long day at work... [00:55] James_w: do I click to expand and type in the new package name? [00:55] tawmas: exactly [00:55] jlparise: If you use NetworkManager you can right click on it and hit "Connection Information" [00:56] interestingly my connection info is always greyed out [00:56] even though I am connected [00:56] tawmas: if you also add a comment with everything you have found out, the steps to reproduce, and the cause of the failure (i.e. where the line is) then it should be triaged tomorrow [00:56] BTW, I just found that if I try and edit the settings from the Network tools applet, it brings up a dialog telling that the interface doesn't exist [00:56] ifconfig thats the one... [00:56] tawmas: the gnome triagers are excellent. [00:56] James_w: excellent :-) [00:56] I'm doing right now [00:56] tawmas: ah, that's odd, you should add that information as well. I've got to sleep now, sorry I can't help you more. [00:57] Ok I just tried it with my IP on Gutsy [00:57] I did get 1 line of output [00:57] I know, it's 2 in the night here ;-) [00:57] Good night, and thanks [00:57] jlparise: ifconfig -a [00:57] yeh I just figured it out thanks though [00:57] tawmas: go to be then :-) [00:57] I get 1 complete line of output [00:58] interestingly it's the same line nomatter what I pick on the information type combo box === LjL-Temp is now known as LjL [01:00] james_w: one last question: do I also confirm it? [01:00] jlparise: so it does provide a response? [01:00] yes [01:00] but as I said that combo box doesn;t seem to change the response [01:00] I am not sure if it should, I just see that it doesn't [01:01] bdmurray: Have you been able to test on your Gutsy as well? [01:01] jlparise: Interesting. [01:02] hrlr: yes and my hostname doesn't show up when I search for it [01:03] You are searching by IP though is that right? [01:03] bdmurray: Yes [01:03] bdmurray: Using localhost doesn't work either. [01:03] I was also searching by IP, however I don't have a DNS server or anythign liek that [01:04] hrlr: If I enter "localhost" I get information, but name is blank [01:05] hrlr; If I enter loopback "127.0.0.1" I get different information [01:07] jlparise: hrmmm... localhost is working here... I must have been trying it under the wrong tab earlier... ooops.... The IP address doesn't show anything. [01:07] jlparise: Do you have any other computers on the LAN that can see that computer that could query the hostname? [01:08] jlparise: That's where my problem is. My router and other computers don't see the Ubuntu system where as they had previously. [01:08] hrlr: I don't currently have another machine available... [01:11] I just tried to do a "ping -a 192.168.1.104" from my Windows machine and it doesn't return a hostname. [01:11] But it does for any other machine on the LAN. [01:12] And typing "hostname" in the console of my ubuntu machine diesplays "ubuntu" as a result. [01:12] hmmm [01:13] sometimes on Windows the host names take awhile to repopulate [01:13] I think the arp DOS command can force a rebuild of the arp tables [01:13] sometimes that an/or cycling power ontherouter/switch helps [01:13] I've been doing that all week and nothing. [01:14] thats all I can think of at the moment [01:15] jlparise: Interestingly, Gutsy never had this problem. [01:15] bdmurray: hmm, your hug day list didn't ignore duplicates, perhaps it should have done it? [01:15] What does ping -a in Windows do? [01:15] resolves hostnames [01:16] pochu: Yes, that would probably make it more useful. [01:16] It'll say "Pinging 'hostname'" instead of "Pinging 192.168.1.104". [01:16] pochu: Sorry about that oversight [01:17] bdmurray: I've opened 10 bugs, and 5 are dups :) [01:18] and of those 5 bugs, 2 are already fixed (the master bug) and 2 already have links to GNOME bugzilla [01:18] That's disappointing. The query takes quite a while to run so restarting is probably not the best idea. [01:18] oh [01:19] I'll see what I can do though [01:19] morning :) [01:20] Is there anyone here that has multiple computers on a LAN that can ping or lookup their Hardy machine? [01:20] Sorry to be a pain. I'm just trying to get this thing figured out. [01:26] pochu: okay, I've a plan thanks for the proding [01:26] I didn't realize it was that bad. [01:27] bdmurray: are you gonna change the list? coz I'm starting to triage bugs :) [01:28] if you change it, that's perfect, just to hold on until you change it [01:28] pochu: yes, I'll change it shortly [01:29] pochu: well, as soon as I can edit the wiki ;) [01:29] ouch, sorry [01:29] hold on a second [01:29] heh, s'okay [01:31] okay, going to bed now, good night (!"§!% DST...) [01:33] bdmurray: your turn :) [01:35] pochu: It should be good now [01:42] Is there anyone here that has multiple computers on a LAN that can ping or lookup their Hardy machine to resolve the hostname? [02:55] james_w: ping. remind me what happens between adding the new patch and debuild? [02:56] hey, I've noticed a serious bug reoccur with hardy, but I believe it is being ignored because it was originally filed in 2006. Should I create a new bug report or something? [02:56] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/35930/ [03:02] mikedep333: I'm pretty sure you've got a different bug. Are you specifying a vga= line in the kernel boot parameters? [03:04] Also, Yay unfixable drivers! [03:08] RAOF: no I am not [03:09] yeah I know. I am hooked on my binary blobs. [03:09] Right. So, that's certainly a different bug. I'll mark it as 'invalid'. Please file another one, preferably with all the ways you can trigger such things (it seems you have a number of bugs there). [03:10] ok [03:10] thx [03:11] Be warned that nvidia are a black hole of annoying bugs. [03:11] yeah [03:11] I've also heard that even the intel drivers are incomplete and therefore do not have the best compatibility with 3d apps/games. [03:12] it seems like there are no good options [03:12] Intel are _much_ better. You mainly see the rough edges when you do stuff with Compiz. [03:13] what I've heard is that many programs under wine (ugh) do not work because the intel drivers have less features [03:13] And the infrastructure to fix those rough edges (and make Intel much faster) is in Xorg git. [03:13] yeah, of course [03:14] I know that WoW works fine under wine on Intel; I don't imagine that there's a lot of stuff that won't work. [03:14] ok [03:14] I'll keep that in mind next time I want to buy a PC with integrated graphics [03:15] Therin lies the problem, yes. Intel may have some actual graphics _cards_ in a year or so, though :) [03:15] lol, yeah [03:15] that would be nice [03:15] and I am eagerly waiting to see how fast the CPU/GPU combos are [03:16] (And their windows 3d drivers will share their infrastructure with the linux ones). [03:16] cool [03:16] what do they do for opengl? [03:16] do they use mesa? [03:17] Not at the moment; the gallium (mesa-ng!) framework is cross-platform, though, and that's what they're using. [03:17] s/using/will be using/. [03:17] I see [03:18] google results don't show much for that [03:18] right now I am looking over the monstrous thread for my laptop to see if people are noticing my bug again [03:18] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4626592#post4626592 [03:19] http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=4617732&postcount=773 [03:19] looks like people are experiencing it [03:21] here it is [03:21] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/190526 [03:31] should the table on the bugday wiki page have lightgreen added to the completed bugs? [03:31] I can go through real quick to fix it since not many have been done. [03:43] does anybody know what package the System->Preferences->Appearance bugs should be filed against? control-center? [03:54] greg-g: that'd be great [03:56] dsargeant: gnome-control-center [04:01] bdmurray: done [04:02] I'll be adding some more bugs real soo now === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Hug Day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080401 | Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ - http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad [04:47] Should LP#207526 be forwarded upstream? [04:48] bug 207526 [04:48] or, maybe someone could confirm it for me. [04:51] are you experiencing it also? and can you confirm that the patch/workaround works? [04:52] i submitted the bug, actually. [04:52] oh [04:54] well, the information provided looks good [04:56] seems like a simple to adapt patch but i don't know if that's something that we'd fix in ubuntu version or pass on to the upstream. i can only imagine the mb of log messages this might generate if it gets into LTS. :-) [04:59] collusion: yeah, do you know the upstream bug tracker? [05:00] the debian bts? not particularly well though i was just reading about it. [05:00] * greg-g doesn't know much about postfix, specifically whether it should go to debian or postfix proper [05:01] hm. [05:03] the file that is patched appears to be a Debian addition. [05:04] so probably debian then [05:04] I've been having problems with Hardy and DHCP as it operates out-of-the-box. The problem I've been having is Hardy not handing off the hostname to DHCP when establishing an IP address where Gutsy is working just fine. [05:05] Gutsy: http://pastebin.ca/965715 [05:05] Hardy: http://pastebin.ca/965716 [05:06] can you limit tcpdump to port 68? [05:06] Sure.. How do I do that? :) [05:07] "tcpdump -s 1500 port 68" should work, i think. [05:09] brb. I'll give it a shot right now. [05:12] collusion: new comment on your bug, looks good. [05:13] ok, did my few for tonight, time for bed [05:14] collusion: http://pastebin.ca/965721 [05:14] greg-g: thx for the help. 'night. [05:14] collusion: np [05:16] hrlr: are you using network manager? [05:16] collusion: yes. [05:16] how do you know that hardy is not handing off the hostname? [05:17] can you pastebin the relevant lines from /var/log/daemon.log? (NetworkManager logs a lot of status information there.) [05:17] collusion: because the router doesn't have the hostname in it. [05:17] hrlr: you're looking to get a specific IP address but you're just getting a random one? [05:18] And when I ping the machine with another windows machine (ping -a 192.168.1.104) it doesn't resolve. [05:18] collusion: No. It should operate dynamically out-of-the-box.. should it not? [05:19] collusion: I should clarify... when I go "ping -a 192.168.1.104" from the windows machine it doesn't resolve the hostname but still pings the ip. [05:20] In Gutsy I don't have that problem... [05:21] ah. [05:21] Everything appears to be fine on the local machine though. I type in "hostname" and get back what is expected. and that's "ubuntu". [05:21] But everyone else on the network doesn't see my hostname as Hardy isn't giving it up to the DHCP. [05:22] But I have no idea how to articulate this bug and where to start. [05:23] Would that be a "high priority" bug if it were confirmed? [05:24] i can't speak to the priorities. [05:24] (i'm new here.) [05:25] ahhhh... so how would I go about getting this confirmed? [05:25] i sort of feel like your router should be assigning the hostname. [05:26] That always comes from the machine name... does it not? [05:27] DHCP usu. works by you telling the DHCP server your hw mac address and it telling you an IP address. The mapping of IP address to DNS name may or may not be handled by the same machine. [05:27] so in general your DNS name may not match the output of `hostname` [05:28] I'm confused as to why gutsy would operate differently in this case. [05:28] in tomato wrt, i can assign myself a hostname in the gui. [05:28] that is a bit odd. are you testing with two separate machines? [05:28] Same machine. [05:28] full clean installs in separate partitions? do they share any state? (e.g. /var) [05:28] Reseting the router on each try so to be sure there is nothing leaching over. [05:29] can you compare /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.* on the two machines? [05:29] (er, two partitions) [05:30] Hardy is installed and I did the other tcpdump from the gutsy live-cd. [05:31] So I can't really compare... other than to say that they're both default installs. [05:31] err... default settings [05:32] oic. [05:33] does "grep host-name /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient*" return anything on hardy? [05:33] this returns nothing [05:37] well, the next thing i'd be curious about is the output of NetworkManager in /var/log/daemon.log between gutsy and hardy. [05:37] sounds like it might be a regression. [05:41] I'm not sure what I'd be looking for... any hints? [05:43] Mar 31 19:27:41 ubuntu NetworkManager: domain name 'phub.net.cable.rogers.com' [05:44] above is what Hardy produced in the logs... I'll bet Gutsy says "Mar 31 19:27:41 ubuntu NetworkManager: domain name 'ubuntu.phub.net.cable.rogers.com' " [05:44] should I go look? [05:45] brb [05:56] well, have to run; hrlr should look for hostname entries in the NetworkManager logs. I imagine there might be a difference in gutsy. [06:25] hello how do i change the status of a bug to duplicate [06:26] symptom: You hit the "mark as duplicate" link on the left-hand side. [06:26] RAOF: wow... amazing [06:27] sorry :) [06:28] That's OK. I've missed stuff over there before. [06:28] Thank you... Im just trying to help out :) [06:44] Ok. I've finally submitted my bug with as much info as I have. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/210095 [06:45] Can someone tell me if I did it ok? (Still new here). === \sh_away is now known as \sh === doko_ is now known as doko === asac_ is now known as asac === asac_ is now known as asac === bigon` is now known as bigon [13:05] Heya [13:05] Happy hug day everyone! [13:09] Ahoi [13:10] I wanted to help with the bugwatches... and took #128451 [13:11] But I don`t knwo what to do: The Bugreporter is on both bugtrackers the same, and both bugs are reported against ubuntu. on bugs.kde.org the bug is not confirmed. [13:11] I think I shouldn`t add a bug watch. Is this correct? [13:14] bug 128451 [13:14] Launchpad bug 128451 in meta-kde "Wrong Hebrew text translation in Kontact: deleting recurring events" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/128451 [13:15] emu: someone just did [13:15] emu: yes, you should add the bug watch, it doesn't say anything about whether the bug is the same status in both or anything [13:16] it just allows an association between the Ubuntu bug and the upstream one. [13:16] james_w: ok thanks [13:16] so here we want to know that it has already been reported upstream. [13:16] hapy hug day everyone! [13:16] happy hug day qense, Iulian [13:18] happy hug day [13:21] you too txwikinger [13:25] btw, is abiword 2.6 going to be included in hardy? [13:26] gense: I'm thinking if it's not on the beta CD, it's not included [13:27] sorry, let me rephrase that. that was quite silly of me. :) [13:28] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword [13:28] Looks like it's 2.4.6-3 [13:28] oh, that's a pitty [13:28] abiword has some great improvements in it's new version [13:29] I think it was released too late for this cycle [13:29] March 24, 2008? [13:31] yes [13:32] are exceptions still granted sometimes at this stage? [13:32] I think this would deserve one [13:32] 2.4 is already 2.5 years old [13:32] http://www.abisource.com/release-notes/2.6.0.phtml [13:34] I'm not sure how it works [13:35] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/202174 [13:35] Launchpad bug 202174 in abiword "Please update to version 2.6" [Undecided,Incomplete] [13:36] there are some things that would need to be done before you could find out for sure === TeTeT_ is now known as TeTeT === _jason is now known as jrib === jp_ is now known as josephpiche [15:24] pedro_: can you look at lp:198111 and gnome:502900? [15:24] does hugday tools work with the current hugday page, which doesn't have bug titles, but comments? [15:24] I /think/ those are the same bug [15:24] jcastro: sure, give min [15:25] bug #198111 [15:25] Launchpad bug 198111 in evolution "Evolution and Google calendar" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198111 [15:25] gnome bug #502900 [15:25] Gnome bug 502900 in Calendar "Google Calendar does not connect, no errors given" [Major,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502900 [15:26] jcastro: right, that's already written in the launchpad bug comments [15:26] yeah, I'm just trying to determine if the comment is correct or not [15:27] not sure the bug has enough information for that [15:27] somebody having the issue should really open a bug upstream [15:28] there's 3 or 4 upstream google calendar bugs which might be related upstream but they don't have details [15:31] yep, comments on both reports are a bit confusing better to open a new one upstream [15:31] ok, on it [15:41] bdmurray: sometimes the upstream report link is not in the comments but on the left under "remote bug watches" and that seems to be confusing for some triagers who don't see them. [15:41] bdmurray: should we add "be sure to look on the left if you don't see it in the comments" on the wiki? [15:42] greg-g: Do you have an example? [15:43] bug 46802 [15:43] Launchpad bug 46802 in mergeant "Failure to connect to PostgreSQL database" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/46802 [15:43] the link is valid and it should be set to "fix released" (although I need to add info into LP about the upstream of mergeant) [15:45] that specific bug was marked as done on the wiki because of the lack of link in comments [15:50] ok, I'm an idiot, I can't get an upstream link for mergeant started because I can't seem to be able to tell LP what it wants to know to set up the relationship. [15:52] jcastro: if you send a report upstream (at least on desktop) please set the status to triaged, thanks ;-) [15:53] greg-g: I hadn't seen the watches in the side before - thanks for pointing that out. I think it would be helpful to add it to the wiki. [15:53] pedro_: noted, thanks! [15:54] jcastro: you're welcome [15:54] bdmurray: can you help me adding the upstream link for that bug? [15:56] greg-g: I can try. ;) [15:56] mergeant is the project? [15:56] yes [15:58] and the problem that you ran into is that the project doesn't exist in Launchpad yet right? [15:58] right [15:59] jcastro: this is something you are pretty familiar with right? [15:59] yep, I am on it greg-g [15:59] jcastro: thankya, tell me what you are doing so you don't have to do it again for me :) [16:01] greg-g: basically, I click on register on the lp front page [16:01] then I create a new project and fill out all the info for the project [16:01] oh, ok. I believe I had done that before (for a different project). Just making sure that is the right way since it wasn't mentioned in the BugSquad "watches" page [16:01] greg-g: https://edge.launchpad.net/mergeant [16:01] you can register a project when selecting one to add a project's bug to the bug watcher [16:01] in the search dialog there is a register project link [16:02] greg-g: I usually go a step further and import their svn, register their bug tracker, etc. [16:02] since so many of the registered projects are empty [16:02] jcastro: yeah, good deal [16:03] I just registered a project and found their maintainer at LP :) so I didn't do a thing(except for the bug tracker) and assigned him as maintainer [16:03] qense: I'll look closer next time :) [16:03] ok :) [16:03] you will be maintainer after you've registered the project [16:04] yeah, I usually chase down the upstream and ask if they want ownership, etc. [16:10] Doesn't it seem like that bug should be fixed by now? [16:10] yeah [16:10] I mean fixed in Hardy [16:10] it should, murrayc is upstream gnome-db and he confirms that it works... [16:13] how do you mean, April Fool's Day? http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/20080401_virgle.html [16:14] I can't find anything in the changelog about it though [16:14] But that is 2 developers saying it works though. [16:15] bdmurray: if the link is to fedora's bugzilla, and I add it as a bug watch, do i set the wiki to Yes or to No? [16:15] greg-g: Do you want to close it or should I? [16:16] oh, yeah, I'll get it. [16:16] pochu: A bug mentioning the fedora bugzilla shouldn't have shown up. What bug number is it? [16:18] bdmurray: bug 36581 [16:18] Launchpad bug 36581 in gamin "gam_server consumes lots of cpu time" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36581 [16:23] pochu: left hand side, under Remote bug watches [16:23] greg-g: ah [16:23] didn't know that. is that because a duplicate has it? [16:23] hmm, not sure [16:24] (don't think so, none has) [16:24] well, it is in a comment on a duplicate, bug 3814 [16:25] Launchpad bug 3814 in gamin "gamin eats cpu cycles constantly (dup-of: 36581)" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3814 [16:25] Launchpad bug 36581 in gamin "gam_server consumes lots of cpu time" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36581 [16:25] ah, that was a bug migrated from bugzilla.ubuntu.com [16:25] I am reposting this from http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6500 as I === \sh is now known as \sh_away [16:25] have received no response from ubuntu developers, and believe this to be a [16:25] (from the gnome bug) [16:25] gamin bug rather than a packaging bug anyway: [16:26] bdmurray: ^-- nevermind [16:26] pochu: I see - thanks. [16:34] is Florian Thomas here? [16:39] what do you do not to duplicate efforts and open the same links? do you assign them to you first in the wiki, and later update the status? === \sh_away is now known as \sh [16:40] that sounds like a good idea, or maybe saying here which one you are looking at === ivoks_ is now known as ivoks [16:42] I'm looking at 182799 [16:44] I say it because I opened 5 bugs in a row, but (at least) 3 of them where looked by someone else at the same time :) [16:44] That's better than nobody looking at them. ;) [16:45] does launchpad report you when you are submitting a change to a bug when someone else has done that before you while you were editing? [16:45] but if we look at different bugs we can triage 4x more bugs :) [16:45] qense: if it's the same, yes [16:46] e.g. I tried to add a watch and it was done while I was adding it, and Launchpad complained [16:46] * greg-g is looking at 133014 [16:47] ok, thanks [16:47] someone wants some launchpad karma? [16:48] then please confirm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/208068 [16:48] Launchpad bug 208068 in totem "totem plays midi, but complains about missing codec afterwards" [Undecided,New] [16:48] hrm, how do I link to a freedesktop bug? [16:48] keescook: what bug number are you looking at? [16:48] bug 205037 [16:48] Launchpad bug 205037 in policykit "policykit or policykit-gnome do not work with passwords containing "%" character" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205037 [16:48] it's painfully obvious, but I shouldn't of course confirm my own bug report [16:49] which I did, thinking this was so obvious a bug and so obviously reproducible [16:49] keescook: so also affects "Project" [16:49] "freedesktop" didn't show up in a search [16:50] * greg-g looking at 198453 [16:51] Isn't policykit the "project" and freedesktop.org just the bts? [16:51] is there any more useful information I could add to #208068 [16:51] ? [16:51] I have no idea. :) [16:52] jcastro: ? [16:52] checking [16:53] bdmurray: ah-ha, I needed to register it, it seems [16:53] keescook: I found one at https://launchpad.net/policykit [16:53] (I just created it) [16:53] * greg-g 181457 [16:54] Okay, sweet! [16:54] hi, should announce with bug I'm checking here? [16:56] I've tried to add a watch for another policykit bug, just as an experiment, and got a message saying "This step can be avoided by updating the packaging information for policykit". [16:56] sbarjola: if you could be so kind, yes. [16:57] So I'm updating it at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/policykit/+edit-packaging [16:58] ok.. thanks [16:58] keescook: so that bit is important too [16:58] #185729 [16:58] as it establishes the relationship between the package in Ubuntu and the project [16:59] jcastro: did you do that bit for mergeant? === \sh is now known as \sh_away [17:01] markvandenborr1: I think I already saw that bug [17:01] the time is now noon, time to do other work. Good looking hugday page so far everyone! [17:02] mvo: bug 208068, I think someone told me you need to update the automatic-codec-installation database, will you do that before the hardy release? [17:02] Launchpad bug 208068 in totem "totem plays midi, but complains about missing codec afterwards" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/208068 [17:02] (in case that was correct, of course) [17:03] pochu: hm, that might be a different issue, I update the database regularly, but I'm not sure if a simple update will make this bug here go away [17:04] jcastro: I did it for mergeant [17:05] mvo: did you update it in the last month or so? [17:05]