[00:27] <Jazzva> Well, the package is fine now... Image zoom is compatible with FF3, but there seems to be bug in it. When it's installed then on right-click on an image it displaces the context menu a bit to the left and up. I would like if someone could check this tool: http://jzv.ath.cx/mozilla-imagezoom.deb ... Thanks
[00:28] <Jazzva> asac, I don't think it's really a big bug, so I think this could be uploaded... What do you think?
[00:29] <fta> asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=741222
[00:41] <asac> fta: no idea :)
[00:43] <asac> Jazzva: is that a regression over ffox 2?
[00:43] <asac> doesn't look too bad
[00:45] <asac> Jazzva: i think i'd be fine to have
[00:45] <Jazzva> dunno... I haven't tested it with FF2. I'd need to install it first, so I'll test it tomorrow, 'cause I'm going to sleep asap... Anyone with FF2 who could test it now :)? Anyway, I'll create the branches now, and we can file a bugreport later, upstream I suppose...
[00:46] <asac> yes
[00:46] <asac> or fix it after initial upload
[00:47] <asac> Jazzva: please push branch asap :)
[00:47] <asac> thanks!
[00:57] <Jazzva> asac: no problem :)... Pushed, bug 209990. I'll subscribe mozillateam now
[00:57] <Jazzva> Hmm... no ubotu
[00:57] <Jazzva> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagezoom/+bug/209990
[00:59] <Jazzva> BTW, should i also provide the diff against the version in the repository, or are the branches enough?
[00:59] <asac> Jazzva: as its probably simplish you don't need the diff
[01:01] <Jazzva> Ok... Well, I'm off... Have a good night :)...
[01:09] <cwong1> asac: ping
[12:50] <fta2> asac, http://blogs.gnome.org/jamesh/2008/04/01/bzr-loom/
[12:51] <fta2> could be useful for your 1.5 branch
[13:05] <asac> yeah
[13:05] <asac> can i do that post-hume?
[13:05] <asac> or i loomify needed before i start :)
[13:06] <asac> i have the feeling that this midbrowser merge will fail ;)
[13:06] <fta2> it seems you can loomify an existing branch
[13:06] <asac> oh cool
[13:06] <fta2> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr-loom-devs/bzr-loom/trunk/annotate/head:/HOWTO
[13:06] <asac> i tried the rebase plugin
[13:06] <asac> but that was painful
[13:06] <asac> with the huge mozilla branch
[13:20] <fta2> mozilla bug 423060
[13:20] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 423060 in RSS Discovery and Preview "Feed Handling in Google/Yahoo/Bloglines broken" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423060
[13:20] <fta2> I'd like to ship this fix in b5, it's annoying
[13:22] <asac> fta2: do you remember when the preference application dialog became empty
[13:22] <fta2> no
[13:22] <asac> iirc, that was crowded with appliations from gnome registry once
[13:22] <fta2> yes
[13:22] <asac> can you remember that too or is that a false imaginatio?
[13:22] <asac> ah good
[13:23] <asac> i think that should be fixed for sure.
[13:23] <asac> damn ... would i only know something ;)
[13:23] <fta2> ?
[13:24] <fta2> http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=149624
[13:24] <fta2> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/announcing-project-virgle.html
[13:24] <asac> nuclear still in beta :)
[13:35] <asac> i knew it ... midbrowser merge is broken :(
[13:35] <fta2> ?
[13:36] <asac> beta 3 -> beta 5 upgrade
[13:36] <asac> i am currently doing this dirt work
[13:36] <asac> of course i was dumb and didn't do a debug build
[13:36] <asac> so now rebuilding :(
[13:46] <asac> fta2: can we figure what the expected behaviour for this firefox.cfg thing is? do we need an application greprefs folder?
[13:47] <asac> (if thats possible at all)
[14:21] <fta2> I would says it should be per app but as only 1 file is allowed, it doesn't matter to have only 1 dir
[14:21] <fta2> says
[14:22] <asac> jimmy___: b5 merge is now available
[14:22] <asac> jimmy___: on its own branch again
[14:23] <asac> fta2: yes. per app is important. but it shouldn't be possible for users to overload the general.config.filename setting
[14:23] <asac> so we need something similar to greprefs per-app i guess
[14:24] <asac> ok out for lunch
[14:24] <asac> cwong1: b5 in repo ^^^
[14:24] <asac> cwong1: now lets clean things up quick and merge to master ... then build packages out of it so i can upload to hardy
[14:24] <asac> preferably with system-xul
[14:28] <fta2> mozilla bug 424489
[14:28] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 424489 in General "Change name of Firefox 3 M13 to "Firefox 3 Beta 5" for official branding (for beta build tagging only)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424489
[14:29] <asac> yeah
[14:29] <fta2> asac, there's a LP bug asking us to revert that, should we ?
[14:29] <asac> why?
[14:29] <asac> i am not out for lkunch ;)
[14:29] <asac> be back in 20min
[14:33] <fta2> bug 206275
[14:33] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 206275 in firefox-3.0 "Remove program version from titlebar" [Wishlist,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206275
[14:34] <fta2> oh, gnomefreak killed it
[14:40] <asac> that was quick ;)
[14:41] <asac> gnomefreak?
[14:41] <asac> is the version in the .desktop file?
[14:41] <asac> fta2: ?
[14:42] <asac> bug 185622
[14:42] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 185622 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 doesn't act as the default browser" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185622
[14:43] <fta2> no
[14:45] <asac> ok.
[14:45] <asac> thats ok then
[14:45] <asac> i doubt that it would be just to just call our build "final" :)
[14:46] <asac> i think we should fix the bug above ... and the bloody gnome registry
[14:46] <asac> that would give our browser a new level of expertise ;)
[14:48] <fta2> whas it ok in b4 ?
[14:48] <fta2> was
[14:48] <fta2> dman
[14:48] <asac> no ... its definitly not ok in b4
[14:49] <fta2> grr
[14:49] <asac> i am not sure about b3
[14:49] <asac> but it worked at some poing :(
[14:49] <asac> thats what i ment by saying "woudl i only know something" :)
[14:50] <asac> i have the feeling that this has something to do with the gio transition
[14:50] <asac> most likely gnomevfs is just seriously broken
[14:51] <fta2> maybe ask seb128
[14:54] <asac> i ask him right now :)
[14:54] <asac> well ... he said that its still used a lot
[14:55] <asac> fta2: do we build gnome-vfs explicitly?
[14:55] <asac> i would expect a gnome.*xpt file in components/
[14:55] <asac> but i don't see any
[14:56] <asac> jimmy___: cwong1: b5 builds fine with current system cairo
[14:57] <asac> except that we crash while shutting down
[14:57] <asac> but thats only in debug builds i guess
[14:57] <asac> fta2: midbrowser-bin: /build/buildd/cairo-1.5.14/src/cairo-hash.c:199: _cairo_hash_table_destroy: Assertion `hash_table->live_entries == 0' failed.
[14:58] <asac> thats only in debug builds? (when using system-cairo)?
[15:13] <asac> fta2: which icons do we need permission for to make prism nice?
[15:17] <asac> fta2: i heard somewhere that you can use gmail in prism while being offline
[15:17] <asac> fta2: do we need another extension for that to happen?
[15:23] <fta2> yes, an extension from google, i don't remember the name
[15:24] <fta2> Google Gears
[15:25] <fta2> it's open source so we can package it
[15:26] <asac> hmm
[15:26] <fta2> asac,  "which icons do we need permission for to make prism nice?" => all those used for webapps
[15:26] <asac> can you give me a complete list?
[15:26] <asac> at best by mail ;)
[15:26] <asac> so i can forward that
[15:26] <fta2> apt-cache search prism-
[15:27] <fta2> +gmaps
[15:27] <asac> would be nice to have the list of urls pointing to it
[15:30] <fta2> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/prism/prism/annotate/fta%40sofaraway.org-20080324204534-1z7zj2mjjcniw58h?file_id=rules-20070927170613-rud1gn2vws5bsh1t-5
[15:30] <fta2> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/prism/prism/annotate/head:/debian/rules
[15:31] <asac> ok
[15:31] <asac> so which images are used exactly? where have they been downloaded from?
[15:32] <fta2> so far, i extract the icons from the .webapps but they are blurry on the dekstop
[15:32] <fta2> and in the menu
[15:32] <asac> hmm
[15:33] <asac> but those have been removed from upstream right?
[15:33] <asac> what do they ship now?
[15:36] <fta2> oh, the webapps are still in trunk
[15:37] <fta2> inspector too
[15:37] <fta2> i'd check the true 0.9
[15:37] <fta2> 'll
[15:44] <fta2> [reed], do you know if there's a "source" package for prism 0.9 ? I see only binary packages there: http://people.mozilla.com/~mfinkle/prism/
[15:49] <fta2> asac, the binary package does not ship any webapps, so no icon
[15:56] <fta2> http://svn.mozilla.org/projects/webrunner/trunk/install/profiles/
[15:57] <asac> ok
[15:57] <asac> i think we have to wait for hardy
[15:58] <asac> i will ask our bizdev folks to get the permission for that
[15:58] <asac> they have contacts to google
[15:59] <fta2> well, as it's still in trunk, i can just do a new snapshot under the same conditions
[15:59] <fta2> I thought it had been removed
[16:01] <fta2> for intrepid, i'd like to split the webapps from the core so icons will be needed
[16:01] <asac> fta2: yes. maybe we can extend gnome to load menu icons like favicons
[16:01] <asac> :)
[16:01] <asac> that would solve this
[16:01] <asac> e.g. just specify the url and a fallback icon
[16:01] <asac> once the user gets online for the first time he will get the good icons
[16:01] <asac> (downloaded by himself - so no licensing issue)
[16:01] <fta2> favicons are lowres
[16:02] <fta2> prism 0.9 already support that for window icons
[16:02] <fta2> +s
[16:48] <asac> fta2: can you set mozillateam as driver and bug contact on https://edge.launchpad.net/mozilla-devscripts/ ?
[16:50] <asac> cwong1: i cannot find any info how to clone moblin branches without ssh access?
[16:51] <fta2> asac, ok for the driver but I can't for the bug contact as i'm not admin of mozillateam
[16:52] <asac> oh ... let me see
[16:53] <fta2> i have prism 0.9+svn20080326r11579-0ubuntu1 ready
[16:53] <asac> i cannot configure anything on mozilla-devscripts?
[16:53] <asac> hmm
[16:53] <asac> but i guess i am blind - again.
[16:53] <asac> ahj maybe on the bug page
[16:53] <asac> hmm nothing
[16:54] <fta2> try again
[16:54] <asac> oh i see more now
[16:55] <asac> done
[16:55] <fta2> i've set mt as maintainer
[16:55] <asac> i don't understand why the team that wants to be bug contact needs to be the maintainer to set it
[16:55] <asac> i guess thats a bug in LP
[16:56] <asac> either you should have been able to do it
[16:56] <asac> or a mozillateam admin
[16:56] <asac> but well
[16:56] <asac> now it works
[16:59] <fta2> would be easier to put me admin ;)
[17:00] <asac> fta2: looks like i can't
[17:02] <asac> the UI allows me to remove administrator rights from anyone, but don't provide the UI to enable administrators
[17:02] <asac> maybe only john can do that?
[17:54] <cwong1> asac: sorry for late response..got your message and thanks for merging the B5 code.  I will pull it down to do a test build.
[17:55] <asac> cwong1: are the next steps ok?
[17:55] <asac> cwong1: what did you ping me bout yesterady?
[17:55] <asac> merge or something else?
[17:56] <cwong1> It was the merge..
[17:56] <asac> cwong1: try the xulrunner build ... after installing the build deps it takes just 3 minutes ;) or so
[17:56] <asac> to build
[17:56] <asac> :)
[17:56] <cwong1> ok
[17:57] <cwong1> Did you have probelm cloning the repo.?
[17:57] <asac> cwong1: didn't clone today
[17:57] <asac> cwong1: ah
[17:57] <asac> no already solved
[17:57] <cwong1> ok
[17:57] <asac> but you should really document the read-only clone url more obvious
[17:57] <cwong1> ok
[17:58] <asac> its not documented at all ... most likely not a good way to attract 3rd party contributors
[17:58] <asac> cwong1: often the git url its documented on the branch overwview page
[17:58] <asac> e.g. below description or something
[17:58] <cwong1> asac: We will add some doc to it...
[17:58] <cwong1> I will do a build and send to our QA for testing
[17:59] <asac> yeah. but having the urls directly on the webgit pages would be handy ;)
[17:59] <asac> cwong1: thanks
[17:59] <asac> cwong1: and if possible send me the xul gconf patch (if jimmy didn't do that last time)
[17:59]  * asac out for a few hours
[17:59] <cwong1> I will have jimmy do that and send to you
[18:00] <cwong1> catch you later
[18:32] <]reed[> fta_: <plasticmillion> reed: http://svn.mozilla.org/projects/webrunner/trunk
[18:35] <fta> [reed], yes, that's what i've been using but it's a snapshot. a source tarball released as the same time as the binaries would be nice.
[18:37] <fta> asac, bug 210155 ?
[18:37] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 210155 in xulrunner "[xulrunner, iceape] [DSA-1532-1, DSA-1534-1] several vulnerabilities" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210155
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:37:38PM] <mfinkle> the linux.tar.bz2 is close, it just has xulrunner in it too
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:37:49PM] <plasticmillion> mfinkle: are you tagging the releases in SVN?
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:37:51PM] <mfinkle> remove one folder and you're done
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:38:08PM] <mfinkle> plasticmillion: I am not - I wasn't until we hit 1.0
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:39:02PM] <plasticmillion> well that'll be soon, hopefully :-)
[18:44] <[reed]> [12:39:05PM] <plasticmillion> so not a big deal
[18:44] <fta> ok, thanks
[18:46] <fta> btw, the build system in svn seems incomplete as it depends on the one in xul/ff to generate the makefiles and do the substs
[20:22] <asac> cwong1: any results?
[20:22] <cwong1> asac: I was able to build it on hardy and it seems to work ok. I did see couple of problems so far:
[20:23] <asac> fta: can you nominate that security bug for the products and releases?
[20:23] <asac> cwong1: regressions?
[20:23] <fta> asac, ??
[20:23] <cwong1> asac: 1)  When I go to yahoo.com and hit the signin button it couldn't go to the sign in page.
[20:23] <cwong1> asac: 2) the back and forward buttons are not there
[20:24] <asac> fta: you can "nominate for release" ... and can select the releases that are affected (like dapper, edgy, gutsy)
[20:24] <asac> cwong1: back and forward is there for me
[20:25] <fta> asac, i haven't looked further. I'm quite surprised to see xul and seamonkey mentioned while i've just upgraded them.
[20:25] <asac> cwong1: and i get to sign in page
[20:25] <cwong1> asac: hmmmm
[20:25] <cwong1> asac: let me try again by removing my .mozilla directory
[20:26] <asac> cwong1: for both cases: system-xul and in-source xul
[20:26] <asac> works well for me
[20:26] <asac> fta: its not about hardy
[20:26] <fta> oh
[20:26] <asac> fta: thats why we should document the releases affected by "nominating for release"
[20:26] <asac> and can mark hardy as "fix released"
[20:27] <asac> cwong1: did you build with system-xul?
[20:27] <asac> cwong1: is your hardy up-to-date?
[20:27] <asac> though i can't see why you won't see the back and forward button
[20:27] <asac> maybe the icons are missing in your gnome theme?
[20:27] <cwong1> asac: I build with system-xul and downloaded your xulrunner beta packages
[20:28] <asac> cwong1: yes ... and you need the libnssX packages as well
[20:28] <asac> cwong1: so all is now at b5~rc2, right?
[20:28] <asac> libnss3* libnspr4* xulrunner-1.9, xulrunner-1.9-dev
[20:28] <cwong1> asac: yes
[20:28] <asac> ok that should work
[20:28] <asac> did you use my .mozconfig?
[20:29] <cwong1> asac: I will double check and I did use your .mozconfig
[20:29] <cwong1> asac: are those packages available for gutsy?
[20:29] <asac> cwong1: no.
[20:30] <asac> cwong1: will take a bit longer, but usually someone provides them through -backports
[20:30] <cwong1> asac: so I can't build midbrowser (beta5) on gutsy, right?
[20:30] <asac> cwong1: you can
[20:30] <asac> but not with system-cairo
[20:30] <asac> not with system-nss/nspr
[20:30] <asac> cwong1: but we should really look forward and use hardy imo
[20:31] <asac> at least during development
[20:31] <cwong1> so I will have the rendering issues in some of the webpages...
[20:31] <asac> otherwise we fight fires that are not really driving things forward ;)
[20:31] <cwong1> I agree but I have some internal milestones to meet
[20:31] <cwong1> like our internal beta4 which is schedule to release next week.....sigh...
[20:32] <cwong1> and its gutsy based..
[20:32] <asac> cwong1: i know, i just hope that those are worth regularaly fixing things instead of driving them ;)
[20:32] <asac> and i feel with you
[20:32] <asac> cwong1: no the rendering should be fine
[20:32] <asac> but why are you guys really care for rendering issues if you know that they will be fixed automatically?
[20:33] <asac> anyway. give it a try
[20:33] <cwong1> the UMG group cares and they are doing a demo in the one of the event coming up shortly
[20:33] <asac> ah
[20:33] <cwong1> I will give it a try and do some more testing and let you know
[20:33] <cwong1> thanks for  your help
[20:35] <fta> http://glandium.org/blog/?p=188
[20:35] <asac> cwong1: np. just get me the gconf patch and QA feedback
[20:35] <asac> ;)
[20:35] <asac> so i can drive this forward in hardy
[20:36] <cwong1> Will do.. Jimmy is going to get the gconf patch today and will send to you
[20:40] <asac> fta: yeah i had that on the gnome announce lis
[20:40] <asac> t
[20:50] <asac> fta: i did that now in bug 210155
[20:51] <fta> oops, sorry, i was on prism
[20:51] <asac> retitled  bug 210155
[20:51] <asac> bug 210155
[20:51] <asac> wake up
[20:51] <asac> np
[20:51] <asac> are there other packages affected?
[20:51] <asac> hmm
[20:52] <asac> thunderbird has outstanding issues, but is not yet released
[20:54] <asac> bug 210155
[20:54] <asac> i think its dead ;)
[20:55] <armin76> mozilla bug 210155
[20:55] <asac> ubotu suffers
[20:55] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about suffers - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi
[21:20] <Volans> Hi asac, today I have changed my icons with that of gnome-icon-theme that is GPL, then I will try to make a pure GPL extension
[21:20] <asac> Volans: that is great news.
[21:20] <Volans> I have only some little dubt on some icons and on one file
[21:21] <Volans> the file is the install.js, that is not mine, I have used one founded when I have created the extension one year ago
[21:22] <Volans> and I don't know the license...
[21:27] <asac> Volans: install.js is for seamonkey, right? we don't need that for firefox
[21:27] <asac> Volans: maybe you can just copy an example from the mozilla dev net?
[21:29] <Volans> In the past I have tried to adapt the extension also for SeaMonkey but it never worked... and after I never found the time to check again this compatibility
[21:29] <Volans> then if you are sure that is not necessary for firefox I can delete it
[21:30] <Volans> :)
[21:30] <asac> Volans: install.rdf should be enough. you can easily test, but excluding it from the .xpi and installing
[21:30] <asac> in fact install.js is not supported in gecko 1.9 anymore
[21:30] <Volans> yes of course :D
[21:30] <Volans> ok thanks, very good news!
[21:30] <asac> hehe ;)
[21:31] <Volans> last thing are some icons that I can substitute, the *ubuntu logos and some icons form LP
[21:31] <Volans> but is not clear if I can use it or not
[21:31] <asac> Volans: are you using stock icons?
[21:31] <asac> (e.g. gnome stock icons)
[21:31] <Volans> no
[21:31] <Volans> why?
[21:32] <asac> didn't you say that they are in a ubuntu theme?
[21:33] <Volans> maybe due to my bad english I'm not explained well... let me retry :)
[21:34] <Volans> until yesterday I used the tango icons for quite all icons and a little number of external icons (*ubuntu logos and launchpad icons)
[21:34] <Volans> today I have changed all the possibile icons to the ones of gnome theme, then GPL and without problems, but the extenal icon problem still remain
[21:35] <Volans> for clarification I use the icons of the size of 16x16px like a favicon near the links that are in my extension that is a menu, like ubuntuforums menu extension
[21:48] <asac> [reed]: do you know a NSPR_DEBUG module that will give parser errors (e.g. for locale .dtd files)
[21:49] <jimmy___> asac: ping
[21:49] <asac> jimmy___: i just talked a second ago ... no need to ping ;)
[21:49] <asac> jimmy___: found the mail about b5 ;)?
[21:50] <jimmy___> asac: carl asked me to provide you the diff for the gconf patch? what exactly do you need? i see the gconf already merged into b5
[21:50] <jimmy___> yeah i saw the email, and i am testing it now
[21:50] <asac> jimmy___: i need the patch ;) .. .so i can move it to ubuntu xulrunner
[21:50] <asac> the complete toolkit patch i guess, but without the default preference flip
[21:50] <jimmy___> asac: i thought you did the the toolkit patch
[21:51] <Volans> asac: you think that I can use those icons? for example one is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/@@/bug-unknown for a link to LP bugs for ubuntu, ecc...
[21:51] <asac> jimmy___: yeah, but i don't have it in patch form anymore
[21:52] <jimmy___> asac: we never did have a patch, because we checked them into the repository, we never created a patch for it
[21:53] <asac> yeah :/ but now we need it
[21:53] <asac> let me look in the mail
[21:54] <jimmy___> so what would be an easy way to do this? diff our master branch against the original source, and take out anything not-related to gconf?
[21:54] <asac> jimmy___: i cannot find your mail right now
[21:54] <asac> jimmy___: yes, just diff the merge 0.5 branch (if gconf still work) against UPSTREAM.3.x for the files affected
[21:55] <asac> if there is no overlap then that should be easy
[21:55] <asac> like git diff UPSTREAM.3.x merge.3.0b5 FILES
[21:55] <jimmy___> but that would include all the diffs we made as well besides gconf
[21:56] <asac> not if you only name the files that were touched
[21:56] <asac> if there is overlap one need to strip manually
[21:56] <asac> but i hope that overlap is rare
[21:57] <jimmy___> ok
[22:28] <cwong1> asac: quick question
[22:29] <cwong1> asac: I update my hardy build enivornment and try to do a build built ran into a compilation error in jsxml.c. I got bunch of underfined reference to "PR_Lock" and "PR_Unlock".  Is it because I have an old nspr lbirary in my system?
[22:34] <asac> cwong1: yes, upgrade against the archive i send you
[22:35] <asac> those will be in hardy tomorrow or so
[22:35] <asac> those or similar ;)
[23:44] <jimmy___> asac: how do you use git-diff to compare files multiple files, i am not git-master
[23:48] <asac> jimmy___: like what i pasted about
[23:48] <asac> above
[23:48] <asac> git diff UPSTREAM.3.x merge.3.0b5 FILE1 FILE2 ...
[23:48] <asac> does that work?
[23:48] <asac> (use the proper branch name for merge)
[23:49] <asac> \o/ this translation thing works ... somewhat ;)
[23:49] <asac> Volans: where did you take your icons from. do you have an example?
[23:49] <asac> path in ubuntu
[23:49] <Volans> asac: yes I have send you the link in query some minutes ago
[23:50] <asac> Volans: if you are using icons that are in the gnome themes you can use stock icons
[23:50] <asac> that will automatically bring you the themed icons
[23:50] <asac> Volans: no ... i am interested in the origin path
[23:50] <Volans> actually the icons are included in the xpi
[23:51] <asac> Volans: yes i know
[23:51] <asac> just tell me an example path :)
[23:51] <asac> Volans: otherwise i don't mind
[23:51] <asac> Volans: you can ship the extension now as discussed (with the exception)
[23:52] <asac> later we can clean this up
[23:52] <asac> (once i have more time)
[23:52] <Volans> I'm not sure to understand what you want
[23:52] <Volans> from the css file, for example a path is list-style-image: url("chrome://ubuntuit/skin/icons/ubuntu.png");
[23:52] <asac> Volans: yes. but where did you copy it from  :)?
[23:52] <asac> the path on the ubuntu disk i want to know :)
[23:53] <asac> where you initially took it ;)
[23:53] <Volans> eheheh sincerly I don't remember... but some icons I have tooked directly from sites, like the LP ones
[23:54] <asac> yeah ok
[23:55] <Volans> why this strange question... there is a difference tooking from my system or from web?
[23:55] <asac> Volans:
[23:55] <asac> #zoom-reduce-button { list-style-image: url("moz-icon://stock/gtk-zoom-out?size=dialog");
[23:55] <asac> }
[23:55] <asac> thats possible in your css
[23:55] <asac> you just need to know how its named on your disk :)
[23:56] <asac> at least we could try that
[23:56] <Volans> ok, but this is true only for themeicons, not the ones tooked from sites, true?
[23:56] <asac> Volans: yes, but maybe you can find them in the theme?
[23:57] <Volans> I can find substituite, but near a link to Ubuntu Bugs in Launchpad will be great to have the LP "original" icon
[23:58] <Volans> but if this can't be done in GPL, I can substitute them with other icons
[23:59] <asac> ah ... now i see
[23:59] <asac> i have no answer for the ubuntu icons yet.
[23:59] <Volans> in the link I have sended to you in query you can see a screenshot of a submenu of the extension
[23:59] <Volans> with "utils" link to ubuntu community
[23:59] <asac> most likely replacing them is the right thing to do