fta | asac, our sdk lacks nsISupports.idl | 00:02 |
---|---|---|
fta | hmm | 00:03 |
fta | nm | 00:04 |
fta | /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b5/bin/xpidl -m java -w -I. -I../../../dist/idl -o _javagen/org/mozilla/interfaces/nsIApplicationTile nsIApplicationTile.idl | 00:18 |
fta | ./nsIApplicationTile.idl:40: can't open included file nsISupports.idl for reading | 00:18 |
fta | I guess I need to explicitly set the sdk include dir :( | 00:19 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
asac | fta_: you didn' setup the right infrastructure directories for sysprefs in xulrunner, did you? | 11:08 |
asac | or just the patch= | 11:08 |
asac | ? | 11:08 |
asac | hmm .ยท. apparently we have not per-gre sysprefs right now | 11:09 |
asac | carlos: the exports came through ... however, there is no .xpi in the tarballs | 11:25 |
carlos | yeah, that manual export request is not designed to do that | 11:25 |
carlos | only language pack exports do that | 11:25 |
asac | and how can i get those? | 11:26 |
asac | can i download the full language pack? | 11:26 |
carlos | from the page I gave you last week | 11:26 |
asac | i have to write the "real" integration now | 11:26 |
carlos | let me check whether we got a new export already | 11:26 |
carlos | that includes firefox | 11:26 |
carlos | asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13040412/ubuntu-hardy-translations-update.tar.gz | 11:26 |
asac | carlos: at best give me the tarball that pitti gets | 11:26 |
asac | is that the one? | 11:26 |
carlos | that one should include those files | 11:26 |
carlos | asac: I got the link from https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+language-packs | 11:27 |
carlos | asac: yeah, is that one | 11:27 |
asac | still have no reply from the de translators admins :( | 11:28 |
asac | carlos: that tarball has no xpi in it (except adblockplus.xpi for whatever reason) | 11:34 |
asac | rosetta-hardy$ find | grep xpi$ | 11:34 |
asac | ./xpi | 11:34 |
asac | ./xpi/adblockplugin/en-US.xpi | 11:34 |
carlos | asac: yeah, I just saw that | 11:35 |
carlos | not sure what happened there.... | 11:35 |
carlos | asac: ok, I found a bug with the export | 11:52 |
asac | cool | 11:52 |
carlos | asac: I'm going to prepare a fixed language pack export for you so you are unblocked and prepare a proper fix next week after the sprint | 11:52 |
asac | ok thanks | 11:53 |
carlos | so future language pack exports are fixed | 11:53 |
fta2 | http://producten.hema.nl (click and wait a few seconds, don't touch anything) | 13:50 |
AnAnt | Hello, someone a package for a firefox addon: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13090871/firefox-praytimes_1.1.3-0~ppa1_all.deb, is it possible that it would be added to ubufox in Hardy+1 | 13:55 |
asac | damn xine-plugin fails to build now | 14:26 |
asac | checking for XINE-LIB version >= 1.0.0... | 14:26 |
asac | *** 'xine-config --version' returned -1717986918.1072798105.-1717986918, but XINE (1072798105.858993459.1076245299) | 14:26 |
asac | AnAnt: is that in the archive? | 14:26 |
asac | fta_: whats the state of our system cairo? | 14:31 |
asac | how much do we diverge from what upstream ships right now (both, version wise as of patch wise)? | 14:31 |
carlos | asac: http://people.ubuntu.com/~carlos/langpack.tar.gz | 14:33 |
carlos | asac: that's a language pack with the bug fixed | 14:33 |
carlos | asac: I removed all other translations from Ubuntu so I get it faster | 14:34 |
fta2 | asac, mozilla bug 421017 | 14:38 |
ubotu | Mozilla bug 421017 in GFX: Thebes "Upgrade cairo to 1.5.12-14-gd89edde" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421017 | 14:38 |
fta2 | that was the last upgrade for b5 | 14:38 |
fta2 | 1.5.14 has been released a few days after | 14:39 |
asac | carlos: ok | 14:53 |
asac | fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/files/u3/desktop-tn.png if you scale that in and out ... is it broken for you? | 14:55 |
AnAnt | asac: what archive ? | 15:01 |
fta2 | asac, no (ati here) | 15:03 |
asac | fta2: XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps do you have that set? | 15:04 |
asac | AnAnt: into ubuntu | 15:05 |
fta2 | root@cube:~ # grep -i XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps /var/log/Xorg.0.log /etc/X11/xorg.conf | 15:05 |
fta2 | root@cube:~ # | 15:05 |
asac | AnAnt: add the extension here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions | 15:05 |
asac | AnAnt: find some QA contact who packages it as bzr | 15:05 |
asac | and we will get that in hardy | 15:05 |
AnAnt | asac: what do you mean by "package it as bzr" ? | 15:05 |
asac | in bzr | 15:06 |
asac | as a bzr branch so we can review and upload that | 15:06 |
asac | http://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions | 15:06 |
asac | there are a bunch of others already | 15:06 |
asac | AnAnt: read the wiki page | 15:06 |
AnAnt | asac: ah, we got bzr repository in launchpad | 15:07 |
asac | yeah | 15:07 |
asac | fta2: are jpeg broken when scaling? | 15:07 |
asac | fta2: do you use -fglrx or -ati? | 15:07 |
AnAnt | ok, thanks | 15:08 |
fta2 | hold on, let me upgrade that box | 15:08 |
carlos | asac: btw, we just got an email to ubuntu-translators mailing list about a bug in Firefox | 15:13 |
carlos | asac: when you go to 'Help' -> 'Translate this application', it points to firefox, instead of firefox-3.0 | 15:14 |
carlos | asac: are you aware of that? | 15:14 |
asac | carlos: thanks ... fix commmitted it to ubufox | 15:38 |
asac | will be in hardy on next upload | 15:38 |
carlos | asac: cool, thanks | 15:39 |
asac | it also pointed to feisty ... not hardy ;) | 15:39 |
asac | carlos: btw, i wonder why all the files are named "firefox", "xulrunner" during export and not "firefox-3.0" and xulrunner-1.9 ... will that change? | 15:52 |
asac | or is that the project name? | 15:52 |
asac | not the source package? | 15:52 |
* asac confused | 15:52 | |
carlos | it's controlled by the 'translation domain' | 15:52 |
carlos | which is a field that we control, so if you prefer that other name | 15:52 |
carlos | Is easy to change it | 15:53 |
asac | I'll think about it | 15:53 |
asac | since we have a firefox (2) package in hardy and xulrunner (1.8) we might want to consolidate this | 15:53 |
asac | i don't think its feasible now, but might be in future: can we maintain two versions translation wise? | 15:54 |
carlos | yes, we can | 15:54 |
asac | ok | 15:54 |
carlos | technically speaking | 15:54 |
carlos | however, the policy is to do it only for main packages | 15:54 |
carlos | so firefox (2) wouldn't be supported in that way | 15:54 |
carlos | unless you do the translation update work manually and outside Ubuntu language packs | 15:55 |
asac | the policy is to only translate main packages at all? | 15:55 |
asac | yeah | 15:55 |
asac | thats clear | 15:55 |
asac | maybe we can have a Ubuntu universe language pack at some point though i guess? | 15:55 |
carlos | yeah, because we have some limitations with current language packs feature | 15:55 |
carlos | asac: that's something we discussed a while ago, but we don't have an approved solution for that yet | 15:56 |
asac | i guess that issue is more on distro side | 15:56 |
carlos | yeah, that's the most complex part of the solution | 15:56 |
carlos | Launchpad side is more or less solved | 15:56 |
carlos | asac: so, should I rename the those files? | 15:57 |
asac | ok, thanks for clarifying | 15:57 |
asac | carlos: could we do that in hardy+1? | 15:57 |
asac | intrepid ;) | 15:57 |
carlos | the rename? | 15:57 |
asac | yes. | 15:57 |
carlos | it can be done at any time you want | 15:57 |
asac | ok | 15:57 |
carlos | it's done in the database not in the code | 15:57 |
asac | ill let you know then | 15:58 |
carlos | ok | 15:58 |
fta2 | asac, no zoom issue with png/jpg using fglrx | 16:30 |
fta2 | using b5 rc2 | 16:31 |
asac | fta2: what i don't understand is thati see it | 16:36 |
asac | on fglrx | 16:36 |
asac | fta2: did you see that i hooked in the xpi export in xulrunner + firefox? | 16:56 |
asac | do you understand why the hook in mozilla-devscripts doesn't automatically kick in ? | 16:56 |
asac | (i had to explicitly add it to rules) | 16:56 |
=== jetsaredim is now known as jetsaredim_ | ||
asac | cwong1: morning :) | 17:35 |
cwong1 | asac: morning | 17:43 |
cwong1 | asac: come down with a bad cold..:( | 17:43 |
cwong1 | asac: I notice that you have move the URL bar to the middle of the toolbar. Is that intensional or by accident? | 17:44 |
asac | cwong1: me too. i am almost dying | 17:45 |
asac | ;) | 17:45 |
asac | have a bad cold too | 17:45 |
asac | but no time to be sick :( | 17:45 |
cwong1 | lol | 17:46 |
asac | cwong1: i moved it? | 17:46 |
cwong1 | asac: ok. I will leave it alone then. | 17:46 |
asac | he? | 17:47 |
asac | cwong1: i don't think it changed its position | 17:47 |
asac | are you sure that its somewhere else now? | 17:47 |
cwong1 | the urlbar used be on the left | 17:47 |
cwong1 | I will check into it | 17:47 |
asac | hmm zoom buttons on the left of it? | 17:48 |
asac | and the quick search field? | 17:48 |
cwong1 | yes | 17:48 |
asac | cwong1: i didn't move it intentionally. if its wrong, go ahead and shuffle it as it was | 17:48 |
cwong1 | ok | 17:48 |
asac | anything else that regressed in a5? | 17:49 |
cwong1 | btw, I am going prepare the package today | 17:49 |
asac | will you merge that branch to master? | 17:49 |
asac | cwong1: thanks! | 17:49 |
cwong1 | I forwarded you an email form our QA and it has a few minor regression, I will take care of them. | 17:49 |
cwong1 | question of uploading the package | 17:50 |
cwong1 | do I upload the package like I did before to ubuntu-mobile? | 17:50 |
cwong1 | asac: ^^^ | 17:51 |
asac | cwong1: is that a xul based build? | 17:52 |
asac | or a complete package? | 17:52 |
cwong1 | it wasn't | 17:53 |
cwong1 | It was a source package along with a debian directory | 17:53 |
asac | yes right | 17:53 |
asac | thats how it works | 17:53 |
asac | i just wonder if you prepare a system-xul package or a all-in one? | 17:53 |
cwong1 | I just need to update the debian's rule, right? | 17:53 |
cwong1 | to build with system-xul | 17:53 |
asac | yeah | 17:54 |
asac | you need to do that. | 17:54 |
cwong1 | ok | 17:54 |
asac | and add xulrunner-1.9-dev to build depends | 17:54 |
cwong1 | will get on it... :) | 17:54 |
cwong1 | got that.. do I need to specify beta5 rc2 | 17:54 |
cwong1 | ? | 17:54 |
asac | not sure ... in firefox we used 3.0~b5~rc2 ... and for final b5: 3.0~b5 | 17:55 |
asac | but mid has a different versioning scheme | 17:55 |
asac | whats the current version? | 17:55 |
asac | in changelog? | 17:55 |
cwong1 | on midbrowser? | 17:56 |
asac | yeah | 17:56 |
cwong1 | 1 sec | 17:56 |
cwong1 | it is 0.3.0b2d~mt1ubuntu11 | 17:57 |
cwong1 | what should I change it to? | 17:57 |
asac | cwong1: i guess we should use 0.3.1 for final | 18:00 |
asac | then we can just use 0.3.0b5a or something | 18:00 |
cwong1 | ok | 18:00 |
asac | i think i already choose a proper versio in version.txt | 18:01 |
asac | use taht | 18:01 |
cwong1 | got it | 18:01 |
asac | please add the ~mt1ubuntu1 extension as well | 18:01 |
asac | if you upload to ~mobile | 18:01 |
asac | PPA | 18:01 |
asac | so i can upload without it to hardy | 18:01 |
cwong1 | ok | 18:01 |
cwong1 | what is mt1 stand for? | 18:02 |
asac | mozillateam1 :) | 18:04 |
asac | you can also use ~mobile1ubuntu1 | 18:04 |
cwong1 | ok :) | 18:04 |
asac | it doesnt matter much | 18:04 |
asac | or ~ppa... | 18:05 |
rzr | hi | 19:05 |
asac | hi | 19:05 |
rzr | hi asac how you doing ? | 19:05 |
asac | good ... a little cold that strikes me though | 19:06 |
rzr | last time you told me that flashblock was in the poll | 19:06 |
rzr | but i dont see it on the wiki list | 19:06 |
asac | http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/132-firefox-3-extension-package-submission-deadline-reminder.html | 19:06 |
rzr | yea | 19:06 |
asac | read that | 19:06 |
rzr | that's why i am here | 19:06 |
asac | you have to add it if you care | 19:06 |
asac | and make bzr branch out of it ;) | 19:06 |
rzr | that's what i am doing now | 19:06 |
asac | (if possible) | 19:07 |
rzr | i am editing the wiki | 19:07 |
asac | and use xpi.mk if its feasible | 19:07 |
rzr | i wanted to make sure noone is on this already | 19:07 |
rzr | maybe you confused flashblock w/ adblock+ ? | 19:07 |
asac | yeah might be | 19:08 |
asac | if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed | 19:08 |
asac | so whoever comes first, wins | 19:08 |
Jazzva | so, asac, I'm not breaking the rules if I don't ask the last uploader (for the packages that are in the repos)? | 19:09 |
asac | Jazzva: 20:08 < asac> if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed | 19:10 |
asac | i'd say that the packages already in the archive are already in hardy | 19:10 |
asac | Jazzva: however, if they are not yet migrated to ffox 3 ... there is no time left to ask | 19:10 |
asac | just upgrade | 19:10 |
Jazzva | ok... | 19:10 |
asac | Jazzva: so no ... atm, you probably don't need to ask anyone if you want to upgrade an extension to ffox3 | 19:11 |
Jazzva | Thanks... | 19:11 |
Jazzva | I thought about that few days ago, since I learned that the proper (and polite) way is to ask the last uploade... But I wasn't sure how to act in this situation... | 19:12 |
Jazzva | Off to choose another one... | 19:12 |
asac | yeah ;) | 19:12 |
asac | just get work done :) | 19:12 |
Jazzva | sure thing :)... | 19:12 |
andres_ | asac, ok | 19:15 |
asac | hi andres_ ;) | 19:15 |
andres_ | 19:15 | |
andres_ | I am helping in the HugDay and is not to do with these reports | 19:15 |
andres_ | ! | 19:15 |
andres_ | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/198287 | 19:15 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 198287 in firefox-3.0 "multiple tabs don't look like in GTK apps" [Undecided,New] | 19:15 |
asac | andres_: yeah. thats an upstream wishlist bug | 19:17 |
andres_ | Usually if an application gnome , Use upstream | 19:17 |
andres_ | ah ok | 19:17 |
asac | its actually only about the arrows imo | 19:17 |
asac | i don't see anything else in there | 19:17 |
andres_ | ok, Then use the same procedure | 19:18 |
asac | sebner: hi! ;) | 19:18 |
sebner | asac: ^^ | 19:18 |
Jazzva | Hmm, the arrows render fine here... Just like in the GTK app. Though, this is the newer version from fta's PPA... | 19:18 |
asac | Jazzva: hmm. | 19:19 |
asac | andres_: you could verify if this is fixed in the next upload and close | 19:19 |
asac | sebner: what can i do for you? | 19:19 |
sebner | asac: I fixed the versioning. but MPL *is* included. I just have to mention it in debian/copyright | 19:19 |
Jazzva | andres_, asac, though, the tab splitting is still present... | 19:20 |
asac | sebner: good. | 19:20 |
sebner | asac: ^^ just because you complained :P | 19:20 |
andres_ | Jazzva, ok | 19:21 |
asac | sebner: you mean GPL? | 19:21 |
asac | not MPL? | 19:21 |
sebner | asac: MPL | 19:21 |
asac | Jazzva: andres_: i don't think the tab splitting is a problem. | 19:21 |
sebner | asac: GPL and this stuff is default on a ubuntu system and you told me to include MPL license file | 19:21 |
asac | sebner: yes right. then why do you say _but_? | 19:22 |
asac | or did i complain that its not in a separate file? | 19:22 |
sebner | asac: xD nvm | 19:22 |
asac | hehe | 19:22 |
asac | sebner: so your extension is ready. great. | 19:22 |
sebner | asac: dunno. I'll update the branch and we'll see | 19:22 |
sebner | asac: not yet | 19:22 |
sebner | ^^ | 19:22 |
asac | yeah. let me know | 19:22 |
sebner | give me some minutes :D | 19:22 |
Jazzva | asac: I suppose... Firefox is not using plain GTK libs for it's GUI, right? So, that might be the source of the "problem" | 19:22 |
sebner | asac: deadline is tomorrow right? | 19:23 |
asac | Jazzva: i don't hink that there is anything like "tabs" in gtk lib | 19:23 |
asac | so there is no standard for that imo | 19:23 |
asac | thats why i doubt that its really a bug | 19:23 |
asac | sebner: tomorrow is good.... i will not refuse extensions finished by sat though | 19:23 |
Jazzva | asac: I played only a bit with it, so I'm assuming :). Never mind... | 19:23 |
sebner | asac: Ah I'll finish today :D to make mighty alexander happy :P | 19:24 |
asac | sebner: gives us a better chance to still fix things in time for hardy | 19:24 |
asac | cool | 19:24 |
asac | ;) | 19:24 |
sebner | asac: where should the MPL1.1 license file should be placed? /usr/share/all-in-one-sidebar/ is bad or? | 19:32 |
asac | sebner: just put it in the debian/ directory and create a file called debian/docs where you add "MPL" | 19:33 |
asac | that will take care of the right place | 19:34 |
sebner | asac: debian/rules can face that? | 19:34 |
asac | sebner: it will consider debian/docs automatically | 19:34 |
sebner | asac: nice :D :D :D | 19:35 |
asac | sebner: like in xulrunner we have: | 19:35 |
asac | $ cat debian/docs | 19:35 |
asac | debian/MPL | 19:35 |
sebner | asac: and where is it situated after installation? | 19:35 |
asac | and it ends up in /usr/share/doc/xulrunner-1.9/MPL.gz | 19:35 |
sebner | nice :D | 19:35 |
asac | so ... it just happens automatically | 19:35 |
=== jetsaredim_ is now known as jetsaredim | ||
sebner | asac: not working :( It doesn't get included | 19:45 |
asac | sebner: debhelper.mk is included, right? | 20:10 |
sebner | yep | 20:11 |
sebner | I will upload the new revision. maybe you can look at it | 20:11 |
asac | maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL = debian/MPL | 20:12 |
asac | maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL := debian/MPL | 20:13 |
asac | but it should work imo | 20:13 |
sebner | I'll try | 20:13 |
asac | yeah .. try that | 20:13 |
asac | Files named debian/package.docs can list other files to be installed. | 20:14 |
asac | maybe use that instead of just debian/docs | 20:15 |
asac | but it works in xulrunner ... so no idea | 20:15 |
sebner | asac: No way Oo | 20:22 |
asac | strange ... where is the branch? | 20:23 |
sebner | asac: bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sebner/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu | 20:23 |
asac | there is neither docs nor MPL in that ;) | 20:24 |
sebner | asac: ah not the actual one | 20:25 |
asac | sebner: all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu$ ls debian/all-in-one-sidebar/usr/share/doc/all-in-one-sidebar/ | 20:25 |
asac | changelog.Debian.gz copyrightMPL.gz | 20:25 |
asac | thjat works | 20:25 |
asac | just like i said | 20:25 |
sebner | wtf? | 20:26 |
asac | sebner: bazaar.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu | 20:27 |
asac | i pushed it there | 20:27 |
asac | you can just merge that to your branch | 20:27 |
sebner | asac: but if I build the package myself it isn't working? | 20:27 |
asac | and then take a look at the diff | 20:27 |
sebner | asac: I thought MPL should be in debian/docs? | 20:32 |
asac | no look ;) | 20:32 |
asac | 20:35 < asac> sebner: like in xulrunner we have: | 20:32 |
asac | 20:35 < asac> $ cat debian/docs | 20:32 |
asac | 20:35 < asac> debian/MPL | 20:32 |
asac | sebner: anyway ... do a bzr merge ... + commit | 20:33 |
sebner | how to merge ^^ | 20:33 |
asac | bzr merge "BRANCHURL" | 20:33 |
asac | then review changes | 20:33 |
asac | resolve eventual conflicts | 20:33 |
asac | then bzr commit | 20:33 |
asac | and provide a reasonable merge message | 20:33 |
sebner | buh | 20:34 |
asac | e.g. merge fix for XYZ from branch URL revision XXX" | 20:34 |
sebner | would be easier when I just move my MPL file ^^ | 20:34 |
asac | yeah, but its about doing simple things in bzr right now | 20:34 |
asac | ;) | 20:34 |
sebner | ^^ | 20:34 |
asac | whjich was one of the other objectives of this it guess | 20:35 |
asac | ;) | 20:36 |
sebner | asac: uploaded but I made some mistakes ^^. The Changelog looks horrible. Maybe I should start from scratch again? | 20:44 |
asac | sebner: doesn't look that bad ... what do you mean? | 21:15 |
sebner | asac: hmm. n00b alarm | 21:15 |
sebner | ^^ | 21:15 |
asac | you should not use comments like "Small fix" | 21:16 |
asac | but there are always things to improve | 21:16 |
asac | sebner: you committed the merge twice? | 21:16 |
sebner | asac: As I said. "Noob alarm" ;) | 21:16 |
asac | ok | 21:17 |
asac | but the current head looks alright | 21:17 |
asac | so lets not bother | 21:17 |
asac | sebner: there is one more thing left. please add the review/sponsor bug to the changelog entry | 21:17 |
asac | e.g. LP: #xxxx | 21:18 |
sebner | ^^ | 21:18 |
asac | we need that so ftp admins can figure the Ack and the FF exception | 21:18 |
sebner | Everytime I started a new kind of motu work I sucked and I have no problem with starting again | 21:18 |
asac | he? | 21:18 |
asac | don't need to start ;) | 21:18 |
sebner | ^^ | 21:19 |
sebner | asac: example bug report for me? | 21:19 |
asac | just add the bug to debian/changelog | 21:19 |
asac | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/ | 21:19 |
asac | there are some | 21:19 |
asac | please file one for you extension so i can document the FF exception and ackknowledge that this has been reviewed | 21:19 |
asac | fta2: btw, the application dialog has been fixed by the .autoreg fix | 21:21 |
asac | fta2: except if you don't have the gnome-support package | 21:22 |
asac | but i cannot fix that for this upload i guess | 21:22 |
asac | i currently have no real clue what should happen if ther eis no gnome-support | 21:22 |
asac | (code-wise) | 21:22 |
sebner | asac: it's totally new to me? Besides that you are here. Set it to new or confirmed? | 21:30 |
asac | sebner: New | 21:31 |
sebner | asac: And subscribe ...? | 21:31 |
sebner | asac: Mozilla Team? | 21:33 |
asac | yes | 21:34 |
sebner | done | 21:35 |
asac | sebner: ok. does install.rdf have maxVersion 3.0.* ? | 21:36 |
asac | if not please do that ... otherwise we need to upload on every new ffox update ;) | 21:36 |
sebner | maxVersion="1.1.* | 21:37 |
sebner | xD | 21:37 |
sebner | xD | 21:37 |
sebner | xD | 21:37 |
sebner | ah | 21:38 |
sebner | no wait | 21:38 |
sebner | there are two of them | 21:38 |
sebner | Hmm I should change this one with 3.0b4 | 21:38 |
asac | for the firefox targetApplication | 21:38 |
asac | yes most likely | 21:38 |
asac | 3.0.* | 21:38 |
asac | the maxVersion should read | 21:38 |
asac | you can change that in ubuntu branch | 21:38 |
Jazzva | asac, what if extension is not compatible, but is installable, since it depends on firefox? Should we just update the Depends line to "firefox-2"? | 22:08 |
asac | Jazzva: is not compatbile even if you boost the maxVersion? | 22:11 |
asac | in install.rdf? | 22:11 |
Jazzva | haven't tried... But I have disabled checkCompatibility in Firefox. It shows the sidebar, but it's not reacting on buttons... | 22:12 |
asac | ah ok | 22:12 |
asac | then its not compatible? | 22:12 |
asac | nothing newer? | 22:12 |
asac | somewhere? | 22:12 |
sebner | asac: already looked at it? | 22:12 |
Jazzva | So, I suppose it's not compatible... nope, neither on addons.mozilla.org, nor on mozdev.org, where their webpage is | 22:12 |
asac | sebner: is it ready? | 22:13 |
sebner | asac: since half an hour ^^ hmm I hope so :P | 22:13 |
* asac looking | 22:14 | |
asac | :) | 22:14 |
asac | sebner: the bzr url is wrong :) ... typo | 22:14 |
asac | anyway, can you change that to ~ubuntu-dev | 22:14 |
asac | and make MOTU the Maintainer: (move you to XSBC-Original-Maintainer) ? | 22:15 |
asac | that should be it imo | 22:15 |
sebner | Hmm I'm just to stupid for such stuff | 22:15 |
asac | hey ;) ... in accuracy != stupidity :) | 22:16 |
asac | s/in a/ina/ | 22:16 |
Jazzva | sebner: No, you're not :)... There's a page documenting the Maintainer address https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField | 22:16 |
sebner | Jazzva: Yeah I know | 22:17 |
asac | sebner: feel free to use you as Original-Maintainer as there is none in debian :) | 22:17 |
sebner | asac: hmm I think you deserve it ^^ | 22:17 |
asac | hehe | 22:17 |
asac | then just switch Maintainer: | 22:17 |
asac | and please replace sebner with ~ubuntu-dev | 22:18 |
asac | i will push the uploaded branch there (so the realm is right) | 22:18 |
sebner | asac: ehm. where change ~sebner to ~ubuntu-dev ? | 22:22 |
asac | sebner: in control | 22:24 |
sebner | ah | 22:24 |
asac | sebner: you can also drop the XS- prefix | 22:26 |
asac | its now a first class citizien control header | 22:26 |
asac | its not that important though | 22:26 |
=== rzr is now known as rZr | ||
sebner | so just "Orginal-Maintainer" ? | 22:27 |
asac | no ;) | 22:27 |
asac | the bzr branch | 22:27 |
asac | the original is still XSBC- := | 22:27 |
sebner | xD | 22:27 |
asac | sebner: oh its already correct | 22:27 |
sebner | xD | 22:27 |
asac | at least here in my local branch | 22:27 |
sebner | xD | 22:27 |
sebner | xD | 22:27 |
asac | no idea if i fixed it | 22:27 |
asac | Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/sebner/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu | 22:28 |
sebner | I don't have a XS | 22:28 |
asac | thats how it reads | 22:28 |
sebner | I have the same | 22:28 |
asac | replace sebner with ~ubuntu-dev | 22:28 |
asac | then its fine | 22:28 |
sebner | xD | 22:28 |
sebner | asac: finally | 22:30 |
sebner | gn8 folks | 22:39 |
Jazzva | night, sebner... | 22:39 |
=== jetsaredim is now known as jetsaredim_ | ||
Volans | asac: Hi, DktrKranz and I have a deb package for a first review | 22:50 |
Volans | maybe you can take a look? http://debomatic.linuxdc.it/hardy/result/ubuntu-it-menu_1.0.6-0ubuntu1/ | 22:51 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
asac | Volans: did you setup a bzr branch in launchpad already? | 23:26 |
Volans | no | 23:27 |
Volans | is one of the final thing to do | 23:33 |
asac | Volans: chrome/ubuntuit/content/ubuntuit/GPLv2Licence.txt | 23:34 |
asac | chrome/ubuntuit/content/ubuntuit/UbuntuitLicence.txt | 23:34 |
asac | those paths don't exist | 23:34 |
Volans | they are in the locale dir, maybe there is some problem in the packaging? | 23:35 |
asac | Volans: no idea ... you reference them in that way in copyright | 23:35 |
asac | please fix that | 23:35 |
Volans | ops, sorry | 23:35 |
asac | i see a LICENSE file in top level | 23:36 |
Volans | and for the icons I have only the Launchpad missile icon and the 4 ubuntu logos not GPL | 23:36 |
asac | maybe thats good enough? | 23:36 |
asac | whats in UbuntuitLicense.txt | 23:36 |
asac | btw, its License ... no Licence ;) | 23:36 |
asac | at least i think so | 23:36 |
asac | Volans: ah | 23:36 |
asac | ok | 23:36 |
Volans | I have placed the license in the locale dir beacause the extension have two locale's | 23:36 |
asac | you should grant an exception for the ubuntu logos in LICENSE | 23:37 |
Volans | it-IT and en-US | 23:37 |
Volans | yes, I was try to finding a system to bring up them from the systems icon... but maybe in the next relase | 23:37 |
asac | Volans: i don't think you need them | 23:37 |
Volans | s/relase/release | 23:37 |
asac | in the source package just the LICENSE is enough | 23:38 |
fta | hm, my bzr is broken | 23:38 |
fta | no more builddeb | 23:38 |
asac | fta: do you have a bzr tree checkout? | 23:38 |
asac | or only .deb files? | 23:38 |
fta | and an assert in pycentral | 23:38 |
asac | i have no problems today | 23:38 |
fta | Unable to load plugin 'builddeb' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins' | 23:39 |
Volans | the other license are there beacose if go to Tool->addon and open the about of my extension, you see a page with a link to the license, and this link open in a popup the license itself, according to the locale choosed | 23:39 |
Volans | en-US UbuntuitLicence.txt is a copy of LICENSE | 23:39 |
asac | Volans: is the GPL translated? | 23:39 |
asac | don't do that ... they are not legally signed off ... only english texts are ok | 23:40 |
Volans | the UbuntuitLicence.txt is the LICENSE translated | 23:40 |
fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/6449/ | 23:40 |
asac | Volans: you can translate texts like: this is licensed under GPL xyz ... but you should not include any license text itself translated | 23:40 |
Volans | why? in the translation is written that is unofficial and to see the orginal one | 23:42 |
fta | hm, for some reason, my .Xauthority is owned by root, breaking my ssh forwarding | 23:42 |
fta | and my theme is broken | 23:42 |
fta | waaa, so many regressions | 23:42 |
asac | sounds bad | 23:43 |
fta | murrine is broken | 23:43 |
asac | Volans: ok | 23:43 |
Volans | asac: like this one: http://www.pluto.it/gpl.html?chunk=all | 23:43 |
Volans | read the second paragraph is in english | 23:43 |
asac | Volans: <em:maxVersion>3.0pre</em:maxVersion> | 23:43 |
asac | you should use 3.0.* | 23:44 |
Volans | I can? | 23:44 |
asac | yes | 23:44 |
Volans | usually i refer to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/appversions | 23:44 |
asac | Volans: well ... we have to bounce ahead | 23:44 |
asac | we cannot update the package on every firefox upgrade | 23:44 |
asac | (every minor) | 23:44 |
Volans | yes of course, ok | 23:45 |
asac | so as we target 3.0.x ... we claim it to be 3.0.* | 23:45 |
asac | in the hope that firefox will not change that bad | 23:45 |
Volans | ahahah | 23:45 |
fta | bug 210168 | 23:45 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 210168 in bzrtools "Installing bzrtools1.3 for Hardy from the bzr PPA causes a pycentral traceback" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210168 | 23:45 |
Volans | I don't know of firefox recognise 3.0pre as compatible with 3.0.* | 23:45 |
Volans | due to the "." | 23:46 |
fta | so i'm not alone | 23:46 |
Volans | before the ^ | 23:46 |
asac | Volans: it does | 23:46 |
asac | the version compare function is a bit strange | 23:46 |
Volans | ok, good | 23:46 |
asac | they try to be "human readable" :) | 23:46 |
fta | asac, are all the branches "buildable" ? | 23:50 |
fta | i'm syncing my ppa | 23:50 |
asac | fta: i think i did a test build of the latest xul, yes. | 23:51 |
asac | firefox worked as well | 23:51 |
fta | good | 23:51 |
asac | i am not sure about nss/nspr ... have to figure that tomorrow together with mozilla-devscripts | 23:51 |
asac | can you prepare bzr branch of mozilla-devscripts for 0.06 sponsoring? | 23:52 |
fta | do you want the midbrowser in 0.06 ? | 23:52 |
asac | no not needed | 23:52 |
fta | I can do that tomorrow | 23:52 |
asac | thats not a high priority thing | 23:52 |
fta | ok | 23:53 |
asac | for hardy midbrowser will be a native package | 23:53 |
asac | because moblin folks do it that way | 23:53 |
fta | ok | 23:53 |
fta | you still need to document lp-locale-export.mk a bit in README | 23:54 |
fta | there's todo | 23:54 |
fta | +a | 23:54 |
asac | fta: yeah. but the cdbs hook doesn't work :( | 23:54 |
asac | the binary-post-install/% :: thing is not called if its not in the rules file itself :( | 23:55 |
fta | oh, I'll have a look tomorrow then. I'm just back from a party, my brain is not very clear | 23:55 |
asac | fta: ok. we can probably wait til tomorrow evening with the update batch | 23:55 |
asac | i am still wrestling on something else | 23:56 |
asac | fta: if we don't get this fixed for 0.06, so be ti | 23:56 |
asac | its just important to have automatically in intrepid when we want to start translating all mozillas in launchpad | 23:57 |
asac | (and extensions) | 23:57 |
fta | k | 23:57 |
asac | fta: so if you don't see an obvious glitch, just close log and push | 23:57 |
fta | i'm building | 23:58 |
fta | dput fta mozilla-devscripts_0.06~fta11_source.changes xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5~rc2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta6_source.changes firefox-3.0_3.0~b5~rc2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta3_source.changes | 23:58 |
asac | why still rc2? lazyness to wrap a fresh orig? | 23:58 |
fta | no, I wanted to do it | 23:58 |
asac | (i think the bits are identical anyways) | 23:59 |
fta | yep and it's released so I can prepare the tarballs easily | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!