[00:02] <fta> asac, our sdk lacks nsISupports.idl
[00:03] <fta> hmm
[00:04] <fta> nm
[00:18] <fta>  /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b5/bin/xpidl -m java -w -I. -I../../../dist/idl -o _javagen/org/mozilla/interfaces/nsIApplicationTile nsIApplicationTile.idl
[00:18] <fta> ./nsIApplicationTile.idl:40: can't open included file nsISupports.idl for reading
[00:19] <fta> I guess I need to explicitly set the sdk include dir :(
[11:08] <asac> fta_: you didn' setup the right infrastructure directories for sysprefs in xulrunner, did you?
[11:08] <asac> or just the patch=
[11:08] <asac> ?
[11:09] <asac> hmm .·. apparently we have not per-gre sysprefs right now
[11:25] <asac> carlos: the exports came through ... however, there is no .xpi in the tarballs
[11:25] <carlos> yeah, that manual export request is not designed to do that
[11:25] <carlos> only language pack exports do that
[11:26] <asac> and how can i get those?
[11:26] <asac> can i download the full language pack?
[11:26] <carlos> from the page I gave you last week
[11:26] <asac> i have to write the "real" integration now
[11:26] <carlos> let me check whether we got a new export already
[11:26] <carlos> that includes firefox
[11:26] <carlos> asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13040412/ubuntu-hardy-translations-update.tar.gz
[11:26] <asac> carlos: at best give me the tarball that pitti gets
[11:26] <asac> is that the one?
[11:26] <carlos> that one should include those files
[11:27] <carlos> asac: I got the link from https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+language-packs
[11:27] <carlos> asac: yeah, is that one
[11:28] <asac> still have no reply from the de translators admins :(
[11:34] <asac> carlos: that tarball has no xpi in it (except adblockplus.xpi for whatever reason)
[11:34] <asac> rosetta-hardy$ find | grep xpi$
[11:34] <asac> ./xpi
[11:34] <asac> ./xpi/adblockplugin/en-US.xpi
[11:35] <carlos> asac: yeah, I just saw that
[11:35] <carlos> not sure what happened there....
[11:52] <carlos> asac: ok, I found a bug with the export
[11:52] <asac> cool
[11:52] <carlos> asac: I'm going to prepare a fixed language pack export for you so you are unblocked and prepare a proper fix next week after the sprint
[11:53] <asac> ok thanks
[11:53] <carlos> so future language pack exports are fixed
[13:50] <fta2> http://producten.hema.nl  (click and wait a few seconds, don't touch anything)
[13:55] <AnAnt> Hello, someone a package for a firefox addon: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13090871/firefox-praytimes_1.1.3-0~ppa1_all.deb, is it possible that it would be added to ubufox in Hardy+1
[14:26] <asac> damn xine-plugin fails to build now
[14:26] <asac> checking for XINE-LIB version >= 1.0.0...
[14:26] <asac> *** 'xine-config --version' returned -1717986918.1072798105.-1717986918, but XINE (1072798105.858993459.1076245299)
[14:26] <asac> AnAnt: is that in the archive?
[14:31] <asac> fta_: whats the state of our system cairo?
[14:31] <asac> how much do we diverge from what upstream ships right now (both, version wise as of patch wise)?
[14:33] <carlos> asac: http://people.ubuntu.com/~carlos/langpack.tar.gz
[14:33] <carlos> asac: that's a language pack with the bug fixed
[14:34] <carlos> asac: I removed all other translations from Ubuntu so I get it faster
[14:38] <fta2> asac, mozilla bug 421017
[14:38] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 421017 in GFX: Thebes "Upgrade cairo to 1.5.12-14-gd89edde" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421017
[14:38] <fta2> that was the last upgrade for b5
[14:39] <fta2> 1.5.14 has been released a few days after
[14:53] <asac> carlos: ok
[14:55] <asac> fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/files/u3/desktop-tn.png if you scale that in and out ... is it broken for you?
[15:01] <AnAnt> asac: what archive ?
[15:03] <fta2> asac, no (ati here)
[15:04] <asac> fta2: XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps do you have that set?
[15:05] <asac> AnAnt: into ubuntu
[15:05] <fta2> root@cube:~ # grep -i XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps /var/log/Xorg.0.log /etc/X11/xorg.conf
[15:05] <fta2> root@cube:~ #
[15:05] <asac> AnAnt: add the extension here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions
[15:05] <asac> AnAnt: find some QA contact who packages it as bzr
[15:05] <asac> and we will get that in hardy
[15:05] <AnAnt> asac: what do you mean by "package it as bzr" ?
[15:06] <asac> in bzr
[15:06] <asac> as a bzr branch so we can review and upload that
[15:06] <asac> http://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions
[15:06] <asac> there are a bunch of others already
[15:06] <asac> AnAnt: read the wiki page
[15:07] <AnAnt> asac: ah, we got bzr repository in launchpad
[15:07] <asac> yeah
[15:07] <asac> fta2: are jpeg broken when scaling?
[15:07] <asac> fta2: do you use -fglrx or -ati?
[15:08] <AnAnt> ok, thanks
[15:08] <fta2> hold on, let me upgrade that box
[15:13] <carlos> asac: btw, we just got an email to ubuntu-translators mailing list about a bug in Firefox
[15:14] <carlos> asac: when you go to 'Help' -> 'Translate this application', it points to firefox, instead of firefox-3.0
[15:14] <carlos> asac: are you aware of that?
[15:38] <asac> carlos: thanks ... fix commmitted it to ubufox
[15:38] <asac> will be in hardy on next upload
[15:39] <carlos> asac: cool, thanks
[15:39] <asac> it also pointed to feisty ... not hardy ;)
[15:52] <asac> carlos: btw, i wonder why all the files are named "firefox", "xulrunner" during export and not "firefox-3.0" and xulrunner-1.9 ... will that change?
[15:52] <asac> or is that the project name?
[15:52] <asac> not the source package?
[15:52]  * asac confused
[15:52] <carlos> it's controlled by the 'translation domain'
[15:52] <carlos> which is a field that we control, so if you prefer that other name
[15:53] <carlos> Is easy to change it
[15:53] <asac> I'll think about it
[15:53] <asac> since we have a firefox (2) package in hardy and xulrunner (1.8) we might want to consolidate this
[15:54] <asac> i don't think its feasible now, but might be in future: can we maintain two versions translation wise?
[15:54] <carlos> yes, we can
[15:54] <asac> ok
[15:54] <carlos> technically speaking
[15:54] <carlos> however, the policy is to do it only for main packages
[15:54] <carlos> so firefox (2) wouldn't be supported in that way
[15:55] <carlos> unless you do the translation update work manually and outside Ubuntu language packs
[15:55] <asac> the policy is to only translate main packages at all?
[15:55] <asac> yeah
[15:55] <asac> thats clear
[15:55] <asac> maybe we can have a Ubuntu universe language pack at some point though i guess?
[15:55] <carlos> yeah, because we have some limitations with current language packs feature
[15:56] <carlos> asac: that's something we discussed a while ago, but we don't have an approved solution for that yet
[15:56] <asac> i guess that issue is more on distro side
[15:56] <carlos> yeah, that's the most complex part of the solution
[15:56] <carlos> Launchpad side is more or less solved
[15:57] <carlos> asac: so, should I rename the those files?
[15:57] <asac> ok, thanks for clarifying
[15:57] <asac> carlos: could we do that in hardy+1?
[15:57] <asac> intrepid ;)
[15:57] <carlos> the rename?
[15:57] <asac> yes.
[15:57] <carlos> it can be done at any time you want
[15:57] <asac> ok
[15:57] <carlos> it's done in the database not in the code
[15:58] <asac> ill let you know then
[15:58] <carlos> ok
[16:30] <fta2> asac, no zoom issue with png/jpg using fglrx
[16:31] <fta2> using b5 rc2
[16:36] <asac> fta2: what i don't understand is thati see it
[16:36] <asac> on fglrx
[16:56] <asac> fta2: did you see that i hooked in the xpi export in xulrunner + firefox?
[16:56] <asac> do you understand why the hook in mozilla-devscripts doesn't automatically kick in ?
[16:56] <asac> (i had to explicitly add it to rules)
[17:35] <asac> cwong1: morning :)
[17:43] <cwong1> asac: morning
[17:43] <cwong1> asac: come down with a bad cold..:(
[17:44] <cwong1> asac: I notice that you have move the URL bar to the middle of the toolbar.  Is that intensional or by accident?
[17:45] <asac> cwong1: me too. i am almost dying
[17:45] <asac> ;)
[17:45] <asac> have a bad cold too
[17:45] <asac> but no time to be sick :(
[17:46] <cwong1> lol
[17:46] <asac> cwong1: i moved it?
[17:46] <cwong1> asac: ok.  I will leave it alone then.
[17:47] <asac> he?
[17:47] <asac> cwong1: i don't think it changed its position
[17:47] <asac> are you sure that its somewhere else now?
[17:47] <cwong1> the urlbar used be on the left
[17:47] <cwong1> I will check into it
[17:48] <asac> hmm zoom buttons on the left of it?
[17:48] <asac> and the quick search field?
[17:48] <cwong1> yes
[17:48] <asac> cwong1: i didn't move it intentionally. if its wrong, go ahead and shuffle it as it was
[17:48] <cwong1> ok
[17:49] <asac> anything else that regressed in a5?
[17:49] <cwong1> btw, I am going prepare the package today
[17:49] <asac> will you merge that branch to master?
[17:49] <asac> cwong1: thanks!
[17:49] <cwong1>  I forwarded you an email form our QA and it has a few minor regression, I will take care of them.
[17:50] <cwong1> question of uploading the package
[17:50] <cwong1> do I upload the package like I did before to ubuntu-mobile?
[17:51] <cwong1> asac: ^^^
[17:52] <asac> cwong1: is that a xul based build?
[17:52] <asac> or a complete package?
[17:53] <cwong1> it wasn't
[17:53] <cwong1> It was a source package along with a debian directory
[17:53] <asac> yes right
[17:53] <asac> thats how it works
[17:53] <asac> i just wonder if you prepare a system-xul package or a all-in one?
[17:53] <cwong1> I just need to update the debian's rule, right?
[17:53] <cwong1> to build with system-xul
[17:54] <asac> yeah
[17:54] <asac> you need to do that.
[17:54] <cwong1> ok
[17:54] <asac> and add xulrunner-1.9-dev to build depends
[17:54] <cwong1> will get on it... :)
[17:54] <cwong1> got that.. do I need to specify beta5 rc2
[17:54] <cwong1> ?
[17:55] <asac> not sure ... in firefox we used 3.0~b5~rc2 ... and for final b5: 3.0~b5
[17:55] <asac> but mid has a different versioning scheme
[17:55] <asac> whats the current version?
[17:55] <asac> in changelog?
[17:56] <cwong1> on midbrowser?
[17:56] <asac> yeah
[17:56] <cwong1> 1 sec
[17:57] <cwong1> it is 0.3.0b2d~mt1ubuntu11
[17:57] <cwong1> what should I change it to?
[18:00] <asac> cwong1: i guess we should use 0.3.1 for final
[18:00] <asac> then we can just use 0.3.0b5a or something
[18:00] <cwong1> ok
[18:01] <asac> i think i already choose a proper versio in version.txt
[18:01] <asac> use taht
[18:01] <cwong1> got it
[18:01] <asac> please add the ~mt1ubuntu1 extension as well
[18:01] <asac> if you upload to ~mobile
[18:01] <asac> PPA
[18:01] <asac> so i can upload without it to hardy
[18:01] <cwong1> ok
[18:02] <cwong1> what is mt1 stand for?
[18:04] <asac> mozillateam1 :)
[18:04] <asac> you can also use ~mobile1ubuntu1
[18:04] <cwong1> ok :)
[18:04] <asac> it doesnt matter much
[18:05] <asac> or ~ppa...
[19:05] <rzr> hi
[19:05] <asac> hi
[19:05] <rzr> hi asac how you doing ?
[19:06] <asac> good ... a little cold that strikes me though
[19:06] <rzr> last time you told me that flashblock was in the poll
[19:06] <rzr> but i dont see it on the wiki list
[19:06] <asac> http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/132-firefox-3-extension-package-submission-deadline-reminder.html
[19:06] <rzr> yea
[19:06] <asac> read that
[19:06] <rzr> that's why i am here
[19:06] <asac> you have to add it if you care
[19:06] <asac> and make  bzr branch out of it ;)
[19:06] <rzr> that's what i am doing now
[19:07] <asac> (if possible)
[19:07] <rzr> i am editing the wiki
[19:07] <asac> and use xpi.mk if its feasible
[19:07] <rzr> i wanted to make sure noone is on this already
[19:07] <rzr> maybe you confused flashblock w/ adblock+ ?
[19:08] <asac> yeah might be
[19:08] <asac> if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed
[19:08] <asac> so whoever comes first, wins
[19:09] <Jazzva> so, asac, I'm not breaking the rules if I don't ask the last uploader (for the packages that are in the repos)?
[19:10] <asac> Jazzva: 20:08 < asac> if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed
[19:10] <asac> i'd say that the packages already in the archive are already in hardy
[19:10] <asac> Jazzva: however, if they are not yet migrated to ffox 3 ... there is no time left to ask
[19:10] <asac> just upgrade
[19:10] <Jazzva> ok...
[19:11] <asac> Jazzva: so no ... atm, you probably don't need to ask anyone if you want to upgrade an extension to ffox3
[19:11] <Jazzva> Thanks...
[19:12] <Jazzva> I thought about that few days ago, since I learned that the proper (and polite) way is to ask the last uploade... But I wasn't sure how to act in this situation...
[19:12] <Jazzva> Off to choose another one...
[19:12] <asac> yeah ;)
[19:12] <asac> just get work done :)
[19:12] <Jazzva> sure thing :)...
[19:15] <andres_> asac, ok
[19:15] <asac> hi andres_ ;)
[19:15] <andres_> 	
[19:15] <andres_> I am helping in the HugDay and is not to do with these reports
[19:15] <andres_> !
[19:15] <andres_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/198287
[19:15] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 198287 in firefox-3.0 "multiple tabs don't look like in GTK apps" [Undecided,New]
[19:17] <asac> andres_: yeah. thats an upstream wishlist bug
[19:17] <andres_> Usually if an application gnome , Use upstream
[19:17] <andres_> ah ok
[19:17] <asac> its actually only about the arrows imo
[19:17] <asac> i don't see anything else in there
[19:18] <andres_> ok, Then use the same procedure
[19:18] <asac> sebner: hi! ;)
[19:18] <sebner> asac: ^^
[19:18] <Jazzva> Hmm, the arrows render fine here... Just like in the GTK app. Though, this is the newer version from fta's PPA...
[19:19] <asac> Jazzva: hmm.
[19:19] <asac> andres_: you could verify if this is fixed in the next upload and close
[19:19] <asac> sebner: what can i do for you?
[19:19] <sebner> asac: I fixed the versioning. but MPL *is* included. I just have to mention it in debian/copyright
[19:20] <Jazzva> andres_, asac, though, the tab splitting is still present...
[19:20] <asac> sebner: good.
[19:20] <sebner> asac: ^^ just because you complained :P
[19:21] <andres_> Jazzva, ok
[19:21] <asac> sebner: you mean GPL?
[19:21] <asac> not MPL?
[19:21] <sebner> asac: MPL
[19:21] <asac> Jazzva: andres_: i don't think the tab splitting is a problem.
[19:21] <sebner> asac: GPL and this stuff is default on a ubuntu system and you told me to include MPL license file
[19:22] <asac> sebner: yes right. then why do you say _but_?
[19:22] <asac> or did i complain that its not in a separate file?
[19:22] <sebner> asac: xD nvm
[19:22] <asac> hehe
[19:22] <asac> sebner: so your extension is ready. great.
[19:22] <sebner> asac: dunno. I'll update the branch and we'll see
[19:22] <sebner> asac: not yet
[19:22] <sebner> ^^
[19:22] <asac> yeah. let me know
[19:22] <sebner> give me some minutes :D
[19:22] <Jazzva> asac: I suppose... Firefox is not using plain GTK libs for it's GUI, right? So, that might be the source of the "problem"
[19:23] <sebner> asac: deadline is tomorrow right?
[19:23] <asac> Jazzva: i don't hink that there is anything like "tabs" in gtk lib
[19:23] <asac> so there is no standard for that imo
[19:23] <asac> thats why i doubt that its really a bug
[19:23] <asac> sebner: tomorrow is good.... i will not refuse extensions finished by sat though
[19:23] <Jazzva> asac: I played only a bit with it, so I'm assuming :). Never mind...
[19:24] <sebner> asac: Ah I'll finish today :D to make mighty alexander happy :P
[19:24] <asac> sebner: gives us a better chance to still fix things in time for hardy
[19:24] <asac> cool
[19:24] <asac> ;)
[19:32] <sebner> asac: where should the MPL1.1 license file should be placed? /usr/share/all-in-one-sidebar/ is bad or?
[19:33] <asac> sebner: just put it in the debian/ directory and create a file called debian/docs where you add "MPL"
[19:34] <asac> that will take care of the right place
[19:34] <sebner> asac: debian/rules can face that?
[19:34] <asac> sebner: it will consider debian/docs automatically
[19:35] <sebner> asac: nice :D :D :D
[19:35] <asac> sebner: like in xulrunner we have:
[19:35] <asac> $ cat debian/docs
[19:35] <asac> debian/MPL
[19:35] <sebner> asac: and where is it situated after installation?
[19:35] <asac> and it ends up in /usr/share/doc/xulrunner-1.9/MPL.gz
[19:35] <sebner> nice :D
[19:35] <asac> so ... it just happens automatically
[19:45] <sebner> asac: not working :( It doesn't get included
[20:10] <asac> sebner: debhelper.mk is included, right?
[20:11] <sebner> yep
[20:11] <sebner> I will upload the new revision. maybe you can look at it
[20:12] <asac> maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL = debian/MPL
[20:13] <asac> maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL := debian/MPL
[20:13] <asac> but it should work imo
[20:13] <sebner> I'll try
[20:13] <asac> yeah .. try that
[20:14] <asac> Files named debian/package.docs can list other files to be installed.
[20:15] <asac> maybe use that instead of just debian/docs
[20:15] <asac> but it works in xulrunner ... so no idea
[20:22] <sebner> asac: No way Oo
[20:23] <asac> strange ... where is the branch?
[20:23] <sebner> asac: bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sebner/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu
[20:24] <asac> there is neither docs nor MPL in that ;)
[20:25] <sebner> asac: ah not the actual one
[20:25] <asac> sebner: all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu$ ls debian/all-in-one-sidebar/usr/share/doc/all-in-one-sidebar/
[20:25] <asac> changelog.Debian.gz  copyright	MPL.gz
[20:25] <asac> thjat works
[20:25] <asac> just like i said
[20:26] <sebner> wtf?
[20:27] <asac> sebner: bazaar.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu
[20:27] <asac> i pushed it there
[20:27] <asac> you can just merge that to your branch
[20:27] <sebner> asac: but if I build the package myself it isn't working?
[20:27] <asac> and then take a look at the diff
[20:32] <sebner> asac: I thought MPL should be in debian/docs?
[20:32] <asac> no look ;)
[20:32] <asac> 20:35 < asac> sebner: like in xulrunner we have:
[20:32] <asac> 20:35 < asac> $ cat debian/docs
[20:32] <asac> 20:35 < asac> debian/MPL
[20:33] <asac> sebner: anyway ... do a bzr merge ... + commit
[20:33] <sebner> how to merge ^^
[20:33] <asac> bzr merge "BRANCHURL"
[20:33] <asac> then review changes
[20:33] <asac> resolve eventual conflicts
[20:33] <asac> then bzr commit
[20:33] <asac> and provide a reasonable merge message
[20:34] <sebner> buh
[20:34] <asac> e.g. merge fix for XYZ from branch URL revision XXX"
[20:34] <sebner> would be easier when I just move my MPL file ^^
[20:34] <asac> yeah, but its about doing simple things in bzr right now
[20:34] <asac> ;)
[20:34] <sebner> ^^
[20:35] <asac> whjich was one of the other objectives of this it guess
[20:36] <asac> ;)
[20:44] <sebner> asac: uploaded but I made some mistakes ^^. The Changelog looks horrible. Maybe I should start from scratch again?
[21:15] <asac> sebner: doesn't look that bad ... what do you mean?
[21:15] <sebner> asac: hmm. n00b alarm
[21:15] <sebner> ^^
[21:16] <asac> you should not use comments like "Small fix"
[21:16] <asac> but there are always things to improve
[21:16] <asac> sebner: you committed the merge twice?
[21:16] <sebner> asac: As I said. "Noob alarm" ;)
[21:17] <asac> ok
[21:17] <asac> but the current head looks alright
[21:17] <asac> so lets not bother
[21:17] <asac> sebner: there is one more thing left. please add the review/sponsor bug to the changelog entry
[21:18] <asac> e.g. LP: #xxxx
[21:18] <sebner> ^^
[21:18] <asac> we need that so ftp admins can figure the Ack and the FF exception
[21:18] <sebner> Everytime I started a new kind of motu work I sucked and I have no problem with starting again
[21:18] <asac> he?
[21:18] <asac> don't need to start ;)
[21:19] <sebner> ^^
[21:19] <sebner> asac: example bug report for me?
[21:19] <asac> just add the bug to debian/changelog
[21:19] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/
[21:19] <asac> there are some
[21:19] <asac> please file one for you extension so i can document the FF exception and ackknowledge that this has been reviewed
[21:21] <asac> fta2: btw, the application dialog has been fixed by the .autoreg fix
[21:22] <asac> fta2: except if you don't have the gnome-support package
[21:22] <asac> but i cannot fix that for this upload i guess
[21:22] <asac> i currently have no real clue what should happen if ther eis no gnome-support
[21:22] <asac> (code-wise)
[21:30] <sebner> asac: it's totally new to me? Besides that you are here. Set it to new or confirmed?
[21:31] <asac> sebner: New
[21:31] <sebner> asac: And subscribe ...?
[21:33] <sebner> asac: Mozilla Team?
[21:34] <asac> yes
[21:35] <sebner> done
[21:36] <asac> sebner: ok. does install.rdf have maxVersion 3.0.* ?
[21:36] <asac> if not please do that ... otherwise we need to upload on every new ffox update ;)
[21:37] <sebner> maxVersion="1.1.*
[21:37] <sebner> xD
[21:37] <sebner> xD
[21:37] <sebner> xD
[21:38] <sebner> ah
[21:38] <sebner> no wait
[21:38] <sebner> there are two of them
[21:38] <sebner> Hmm I should change this one with 3.0b4
[21:38] <asac> for the firefox targetApplication
[21:38] <asac> yes most likely
[21:38] <asac> 3.0.*
[21:38] <asac> the maxVersion should read
[21:38] <asac> you can change that in ubuntu branch
[22:08] <Jazzva> asac, what if extension is not compatible, but is installable, since it depends on firefox? Should we just update the Depends line to "firefox-2"?
[22:11] <asac> Jazzva: is not compatbile even if you boost the maxVersion?
[22:11] <asac> in install.rdf?
[22:12] <Jazzva> haven't tried... But I have disabled checkCompatibility in Firefox. It shows the sidebar, but it's not reacting on buttons...
[22:12] <asac> ah ok
[22:12] <asac> then its not compatible?
[22:12] <asac> nothing newer?
[22:12] <asac> somewhere?
[22:12] <sebner> asac: already looked at it?
[22:12] <Jazzva> So, I suppose it's not compatible... nope, neither on addons.mozilla.org, nor on mozdev.org, where their webpage is
[22:13] <asac> sebner: is it ready?
[22:13] <sebner> asac: since half an hour ^^ hmm I hope so :P
[22:14]  * asac looking
[22:14] <asac> :)
[22:14] <asac> sebner: the bzr url is wrong :) ... typo
[22:14] <asac> anyway, can you change that to ~ubuntu-dev
[22:15] <asac> and make MOTU the Maintainer: (move you to XSBC-Original-Maintainer) ?
[22:15] <asac> that should be it imo
[22:15] <sebner> Hmm I'm just to stupid for such stuff
[22:16] <asac> hey ;) ... in accuracy != stupidity :)
[22:16] <asac> s/in a/ina/
[22:16] <Jazzva> sebner: No, you're not :)... There's a page documenting the Maintainer address https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField
[22:17] <sebner> Jazzva: Yeah I know
[22:17] <asac> sebner: feel free to use you as Original-Maintainer as there is none in debian :)
[22:17] <sebner> asac: hmm I think you deserve it ^^
[22:17] <asac> hehe
[22:17] <asac> then just switch Maintainer:
[22:18] <asac> and please replace sebner with ~ubuntu-dev
[22:18] <asac> i will push the uploaded branch there (so the realm is right)
[22:22] <sebner> asac: ehm. where change  ~sebner to ~ubuntu-dev ?
[22:24] <asac> sebner: in control
[22:24] <sebner> ah
[22:26] <asac> sebner: you can also drop the XS- prefix
[22:26] <asac> its now a first class citizien control header
[22:26] <asac> its not that important though
[22:27] <sebner> so just "Orginal-Maintainer" ?
[22:27] <asac> no ;)
[22:27] <asac> the bzr branch
[22:27] <asac> the original is still XSBC- :=
[22:27] <sebner> xD
[22:27] <asac> sebner: oh its already correct
[22:27] <sebner> xD
[22:27] <asac> at least here in my local branch
[22:27] <sebner> xD
[22:27] <sebner> xD
[22:27] <asac> no idea if i fixed it
[22:28] <asac> Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/sebner/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu
[22:28] <sebner> I don't have a XS
[22:28] <asac> thats how it reads
[22:28] <sebner> I have the same
[22:28] <asac> replace sebner with ~ubuntu-dev
[22:28] <asac> then its fine
[22:28] <sebner> xD
[22:30] <sebner> asac: finally
[22:39] <sebner> gn8 folks
[22:39] <Jazzva> night, sebner...
[22:50] <Volans> asac: Hi, DktrKranz and I have a deb package for a first review
[22:51] <Volans> maybe you can take a look? http://debomatic.linuxdc.it/hardy/result/ubuntu-it-menu_1.0.6-0ubuntu1/
[23:26] <asac> Volans: did you setup a bzr branch in launchpad already?
[23:27] <Volans> no
[23:33] <Volans> is one of the final thing to do
[23:34] <asac> Volans: chrome/ubuntuit/content/ubuntuit/GPLv2Licence.txt
[23:34] <asac> chrome/ubuntuit/content/ubuntuit/UbuntuitLicence.txt
[23:34] <asac> those paths don't exist
[23:35] <Volans> they are in the locale dir, maybe there is some problem in the packaging?
[23:35] <asac> Volans: no idea ... you reference them in that way in copyright
[23:35] <asac> please fix that
[23:35] <Volans> ops, sorry
[23:36] <asac> i see a LICENSE file in top level
[23:36] <Volans> and for the icons I have only the Launchpad missile icon and the 4 ubuntu logos not GPL
[23:36] <asac> maybe thats good enough?
[23:36] <asac> whats in UbuntuitLicense.txt
[23:36] <asac> btw, its License ... no Licence ;)
[23:36] <asac> at least i think so
[23:36] <asac> Volans: ah
[23:36] <asac> ok
[23:36] <Volans> I have placed the license in the locale dir beacause the extension have two locale's
[23:37] <asac> you should grant an exception for the ubuntu logos in LICENSE
[23:37] <Volans> it-IT and en-US
[23:37] <Volans> yes, I was try to finding a system to bring up them from the systems icon... but maybe in the next relase
[23:37] <asac> Volans: i don't think you need them
[23:37] <Volans> s/relase/release
[23:38] <asac> in the source package just the LICENSE is enough
[23:38] <fta> hm, my bzr is broken
[23:38] <fta> no more builddeb
[23:38] <asac> fta: do you have a bzr tree checkout?
[23:38] <asac> or only .deb files?
[23:38] <fta> and an assert in pycentral
[23:38] <asac> i have no problems today
[23:39] <fta> Unable to load plugin 'builddeb' from '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins'
[23:39] <Volans> the other license are there beacose if go to Tool->addon and open the about of my extension, you see a page with a link to the license, and this link open in a popup the license itself, according to the locale choosed
[23:39] <Volans> en-US UbuntuitLicence.txt is a copy of LICENSE
[23:39] <asac> Volans: is the GPL translated?
[23:40] <asac> don't do that ... they are not legally signed off ... only english texts are ok
[23:40] <Volans> the UbuntuitLicence.txt is the LICENSE translated
[23:40] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6449/
[23:40] <asac> Volans: you can translate texts like: this is licensed under GPL xyz ... but you should not include any license text itself translated
[23:42] <Volans> why? in the translation is written that is unofficial and to see the orginal one
[23:42] <fta> hm, for some reason, my .Xauthority is owned by root, breaking my ssh forwarding
[23:42] <fta> and my theme is broken
[23:42] <fta> waaa, so many regressions
[23:43] <asac> sounds bad
[23:43] <fta> murrine is broken
[23:43] <asac> Volans: ok
[23:43] <Volans> asac: like this one: http://www.pluto.it/gpl.html?chunk=all
[23:43] <Volans> read the second paragraph is in english
[23:43] <asac> Volans: <em:maxVersion>3.0pre</em:maxVersion>
[23:44] <asac> you should use 3.0.*
[23:44] <Volans> I can?
[23:44] <asac> yes
[23:44] <Volans> usually i refer to  https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/appversions
[23:44] <asac> Volans: well ... we have to bounce ahead
[23:44] <asac> we cannot update the package on every firefox upgrade
[23:44] <asac> (every minor)
[23:45] <Volans> yes of course, ok
[23:45] <asac> so as we target 3.0.x ... we claim it to be 3.0.*
[23:45] <asac> in the hope that firefox will not change that bad
[23:45] <Volans> ahahah
[23:45] <fta> bug 210168
[23:45] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 210168 in bzrtools "Installing bzrtools1.3 for Hardy from the bzr PPA causes a pycentral traceback" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210168
[23:45] <Volans> I don't know of firefox recognise 3.0pre as compatible with 3.0.*
[23:46] <Volans> due to the "."
[23:46] <fta> so i'm not alone
[23:46] <Volans> before the ^
[23:46] <asac> Volans: it does
[23:46] <asac> the version compare function is a bit strange
[23:46] <Volans> ok, good
[23:46] <asac> they try to be "human readable" :)
[23:50] <fta> asac, are all the branches "buildable" ?
[23:50] <fta> i'm syncing my ppa
[23:51] <asac> fta: i think i did a test build of the latest xul, yes.
[23:51] <asac> firefox worked as well
[23:51] <fta> good
[23:51] <asac> i am not sure about nss/nspr ... have to figure that tomorrow together with mozilla-devscripts
[23:52] <asac> can you prepare bzr branch of mozilla-devscripts for 0.06 sponsoring?
[23:52] <fta> do you want the midbrowser in 0.06 ?
[23:52] <asac> no not needed
[23:52] <fta> I can do that tomorrow
[23:52] <asac> thats not a high priority thing
[23:53] <fta> ok
[23:53] <asac> for hardy midbrowser will be a native package
[23:53] <asac> because moblin folks do it that way
[23:53] <fta> ok
[23:54] <fta> you still need to document lp-locale-export.mk a bit in README
[23:54] <fta> there's  todo
[23:54] <fta> +a
[23:54] <asac> fta: yeah. but the cdbs hook doesn't work :(
[23:55] <asac> the binary-post-install/% :: thing is not called if its not in the rules file itself :(
[23:55] <fta> oh, I'll have a look tomorrow then. I'm just back from a party, my brain is not very clear
[23:55] <asac> fta: ok. we can probably wait til tomorrow evening with the update batch
[23:56] <asac> i am still wrestling on something else
[23:56] <asac> fta: if we don't get this fixed for 0.06, so be ti
[23:57] <asac> its just important to have automatically in intrepid when we want to start translating all mozillas in launchpad
[23:57] <asac> (and extensions)
[23:57] <fta> k
[23:57] <asac> fta: so if you don't see an obvious glitch, just close log and push
[23:58] <fta> i'm building
[23:58] <fta> dput fta mozilla-devscripts_0.06~fta11_source.changes xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5~rc2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta6_source.changes firefox-3.0_3.0~b5~rc2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta3_source.changes
[23:58] <asac> why still rc2? lazyness to wrap a fresh orig?
[23:58] <fta> no, I wanted to do it
[23:59] <asac> (i think the bits are identical anyways)
[23:59] <fta> yep and it's released so I can prepare the tarballs easily