[00:02] asac, our sdk lacks nsISupports.idl [00:03] hmm [00:04] nm [00:18] /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b5/bin/xpidl -m java -w -I. -I../../../dist/idl -o _javagen/org/mozilla/interfaces/nsIApplicationTile nsIApplicationTile.idl [00:18] ./nsIApplicationTile.idl:40: can't open included file nsISupports.idl for reading [00:19] I guess I need to explicitly set the sdk include dir :( === asac_ is now known as asac [11:08] fta_: you didn' setup the right infrastructure directories for sysprefs in xulrunner, did you? [11:08] or just the patch= [11:08] ? [11:09] hmm .·. apparently we have not per-gre sysprefs right now [11:25] carlos: the exports came through ... however, there is no .xpi in the tarballs [11:25] yeah, that manual export request is not designed to do that [11:25] only language pack exports do that [11:26] and how can i get those? [11:26] can i download the full language pack? [11:26] from the page I gave you last week [11:26] i have to write the "real" integration now [11:26] let me check whether we got a new export already [11:26] that includes firefox [11:26] asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13040412/ubuntu-hardy-translations-update.tar.gz [11:26] carlos: at best give me the tarball that pitti gets [11:26] is that the one? [11:26] that one should include those files [11:27] asac: I got the link from https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+language-packs [11:27] asac: yeah, is that one [11:28] still have no reply from the de translators admins :( [11:34] carlos: that tarball has no xpi in it (except adblockplus.xpi for whatever reason) [11:34] rosetta-hardy$ find | grep xpi$ [11:34] ./xpi [11:34] ./xpi/adblockplugin/en-US.xpi [11:35] asac: yeah, I just saw that [11:35] not sure what happened there.... [11:52] asac: ok, I found a bug with the export [11:52] cool [11:52] asac: I'm going to prepare a fixed language pack export for you so you are unblocked and prepare a proper fix next week after the sprint [11:53] ok thanks [11:53] so future language pack exports are fixed [13:50] http://producten.hema.nl (click and wait a few seconds, don't touch anything) [13:55] Hello, someone a package for a firefox addon: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13090871/firefox-praytimes_1.1.3-0~ppa1_all.deb, is it possible that it would be added to ubufox in Hardy+1 [14:26] damn xine-plugin fails to build now [14:26] checking for XINE-LIB version >= 1.0.0... [14:26] *** 'xine-config --version' returned -1717986918.1072798105.-1717986918, but XINE (1072798105.858993459.1076245299) [14:26] AnAnt: is that in the archive? [14:31] fta_: whats the state of our system cairo? [14:31] how much do we diverge from what upstream ships right now (both, version wise as of patch wise)? [14:33] asac: http://people.ubuntu.com/~carlos/langpack.tar.gz [14:33] asac: that's a language pack with the bug fixed [14:34] asac: I removed all other translations from Ubuntu so I get it faster [14:38] asac, mozilla bug 421017 [14:38] Mozilla bug 421017 in GFX: Thebes "Upgrade cairo to 1.5.12-14-gd89edde" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421017 [14:38] that was the last upgrade for b5 [14:39] 1.5.14 has been released a few days after [14:53] carlos: ok [14:55] fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/files/u3/desktop-tn.png if you scale that in and out ... is it broken for you? [15:01] asac: what archive ? [15:03] asac, no (ati here) [15:04] fta2: XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps do you have that set? [15:05] AnAnt: into ubuntu [15:05] root@cube:~ # grep -i XaaNoOffScreenPixmaps /var/log/Xorg.0.log /etc/X11/xorg.conf [15:05] root@cube:~ # [15:05] AnAnt: add the extension here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions [15:05] AnAnt: find some QA contact who packages it as bzr [15:05] and we will get that in hardy [15:05] asac: what do you mean by "package it as bzr" ? [15:06] in bzr [15:06] as a bzr branch so we can review and upload that [15:06] http://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions [15:06] there are a bunch of others already [15:06] AnAnt: read the wiki page [15:07] asac: ah, we got bzr repository in launchpad [15:07] yeah [15:07] fta2: are jpeg broken when scaling? [15:07] fta2: do you use -fglrx or -ati? [15:08] ok, thanks [15:08] hold on, let me upgrade that box [15:13] asac: btw, we just got an email to ubuntu-translators mailing list about a bug in Firefox [15:14] asac: when you go to 'Help' -> 'Translate this application', it points to firefox, instead of firefox-3.0 [15:14] asac: are you aware of that? [15:38] carlos: thanks ... fix commmitted it to ubufox [15:38] will be in hardy on next upload [15:39] asac: cool, thanks [15:39] it also pointed to feisty ... not hardy ;) [15:52] carlos: btw, i wonder why all the files are named "firefox", "xulrunner" during export and not "firefox-3.0" and xulrunner-1.9 ... will that change? [15:52] or is that the project name? [15:52] not the source package? [15:52] * asac confused [15:52] it's controlled by the 'translation domain' [15:52] which is a field that we control, so if you prefer that other name [15:53] Is easy to change it [15:53] I'll think about it [15:53] since we have a firefox (2) package in hardy and xulrunner (1.8) we might want to consolidate this [15:54] i don't think its feasible now, but might be in future: can we maintain two versions translation wise? [15:54] yes, we can [15:54] ok [15:54] technically speaking [15:54] however, the policy is to do it only for main packages [15:54] so firefox (2) wouldn't be supported in that way [15:55] unless you do the translation update work manually and outside Ubuntu language packs [15:55] the policy is to only translate main packages at all? [15:55] yeah [15:55] thats clear [15:55] maybe we can have a Ubuntu universe language pack at some point though i guess? [15:55] yeah, because we have some limitations with current language packs feature [15:56] asac: that's something we discussed a while ago, but we don't have an approved solution for that yet [15:56] i guess that issue is more on distro side [15:56] yeah, that's the most complex part of the solution [15:56] Launchpad side is more or less solved [15:57] asac: so, should I rename the those files? [15:57] ok, thanks for clarifying [15:57] carlos: could we do that in hardy+1? [15:57] intrepid ;) [15:57] the rename? [15:57] yes. [15:57] it can be done at any time you want [15:57] ok [15:57] it's done in the database not in the code [15:58] ill let you know then [15:58] ok [16:30] asac, no zoom issue with png/jpg using fglrx [16:31] using b5 rc2 [16:36] fta2: what i don't understand is thati see it [16:36] on fglrx [16:56] fta2: did you see that i hooked in the xpi export in xulrunner + firefox? [16:56] do you understand why the hook in mozilla-devscripts doesn't automatically kick in ? [16:56] (i had to explicitly add it to rules) === jetsaredim is now known as jetsaredim_ [17:35] cwong1: morning :) [17:43] asac: morning [17:43] asac: come down with a bad cold..:( [17:44] asac: I notice that you have move the URL bar to the middle of the toolbar. Is that intensional or by accident? [17:45] cwong1: me too. i am almost dying [17:45] ;) [17:45] have a bad cold too [17:45] but no time to be sick :( [17:46] lol [17:46] cwong1: i moved it? [17:46] asac: ok. I will leave it alone then. [17:47] he? [17:47] cwong1: i don't think it changed its position [17:47] are you sure that its somewhere else now? [17:47] the urlbar used be on the left [17:47] I will check into it [17:48] hmm zoom buttons on the left of it? [17:48] and the quick search field? [17:48] yes [17:48] cwong1: i didn't move it intentionally. if its wrong, go ahead and shuffle it as it was [17:48] ok [17:49] anything else that regressed in a5? [17:49] btw, I am going prepare the package today [17:49] will you merge that branch to master? [17:49] cwong1: thanks! [17:49] I forwarded you an email form our QA and it has a few minor regression, I will take care of them. [17:50] question of uploading the package [17:50] do I upload the package like I did before to ubuntu-mobile? [17:51] asac: ^^^ [17:52] cwong1: is that a xul based build? [17:52] or a complete package? [17:53] it wasn't [17:53] It was a source package along with a debian directory [17:53] yes right [17:53] thats how it works [17:53] i just wonder if you prepare a system-xul package or a all-in one? [17:53] I just need to update the debian's rule, right? [17:53] to build with system-xul [17:54] yeah [17:54] you need to do that. [17:54] ok [17:54] and add xulrunner-1.9-dev to build depends [17:54] will get on it... :) [17:54] got that.. do I need to specify beta5 rc2 [17:54] ? [17:55] not sure ... in firefox we used 3.0~b5~rc2 ... and for final b5: 3.0~b5 [17:55] but mid has a different versioning scheme [17:55] whats the current version? [17:55] in changelog? [17:56] on midbrowser? [17:56] yeah [17:56] 1 sec [17:57] it is 0.3.0b2d~mt1ubuntu11 [17:57] what should I change it to? [18:00] cwong1: i guess we should use 0.3.1 for final [18:00] then we can just use 0.3.0b5a or something [18:00] ok [18:01] i think i already choose a proper versio in version.txt [18:01] use taht [18:01] got it [18:01] please add the ~mt1ubuntu1 extension as well [18:01] if you upload to ~mobile [18:01] PPA [18:01] so i can upload without it to hardy [18:01] ok [18:02] what is mt1 stand for? [18:04] mozillateam1 :) [18:04] you can also use ~mobile1ubuntu1 [18:04] ok :) [18:04] it doesnt matter much [18:05] or ~ppa... [19:05] hi [19:05] hi [19:05] hi asac how you doing ? [19:06] good ... a little cold that strikes me though [19:06] last time you told me that flashblock was in the poll [19:06] but i dont see it on the wiki list [19:06] http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/132-firefox-3-extension-package-submission-deadline-reminder.html [19:06] yea [19:06] read that [19:06] that's why i am here [19:06] you have to add it if you care [19:06] and make bzr branch out of it ;) [19:06] that's what i am doing now [19:07] (if possible) [19:07] i am editing the wiki [19:07] and use xpi.mk if its feasible [19:07] i wanted to make sure noone is on this already [19:07] maybe you confused flashblock w/ adblock+ ? [19:08] yeah might be [19:08] if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed [19:08] so whoever comes first, wins [19:09] so, asac, I'm not breaking the rules if I don't ask the last uploader (for the packages that are in the repos)? [19:10] Jazzva: 20:08 < asac> if its not on that page and not in hardy yet then its definitly not claimed [19:10] i'd say that the packages already in the archive are already in hardy [19:10] Jazzva: however, if they are not yet migrated to ffox 3 ... there is no time left to ask [19:10] just upgrade [19:10] ok... [19:11] Jazzva: so no ... atm, you probably don't need to ask anyone if you want to upgrade an extension to ffox3 [19:11] Thanks... [19:12] I thought about that few days ago, since I learned that the proper (and polite) way is to ask the last uploade... But I wasn't sure how to act in this situation... [19:12] Off to choose another one... [19:12] yeah ;) [19:12] just get work done :) [19:12] sure thing :)... [19:15] asac, ok [19:15] hi andres_ ;) [19:15] [19:15] I am helping in the HugDay and is not to do with these reports [19:15] ! [19:15] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/198287 [19:15] Launchpad bug 198287 in firefox-3.0 "multiple tabs don't look like in GTK apps" [Undecided,New] [19:17] andres_: yeah. thats an upstream wishlist bug [19:17] Usually if an application gnome , Use upstream [19:17] ah ok [19:17] its actually only about the arrows imo [19:17] i don't see anything else in there [19:18] ok, Then use the same procedure [19:18] sebner: hi! ;) [19:18] asac: ^^ [19:18] Hmm, the arrows render fine here... Just like in the GTK app. Though, this is the newer version from fta's PPA... [19:19] Jazzva: hmm. [19:19] andres_: you could verify if this is fixed in the next upload and close [19:19] sebner: what can i do for you? [19:19] asac: I fixed the versioning. but MPL *is* included. I just have to mention it in debian/copyright [19:20] andres_, asac, though, the tab splitting is still present... [19:20] sebner: good. [19:20] asac: ^^ just because you complained :P [19:21] Jazzva, ok [19:21] sebner: you mean GPL? [19:21] not MPL? [19:21] asac: MPL [19:21] Jazzva: andres_: i don't think the tab splitting is a problem. [19:21] asac: GPL and this stuff is default on a ubuntu system and you told me to include MPL license file [19:22] sebner: yes right. then why do you say _but_? [19:22] or did i complain that its not in a separate file? [19:22] asac: xD nvm [19:22] hehe [19:22] sebner: so your extension is ready. great. [19:22] asac: dunno. I'll update the branch and we'll see [19:22] asac: not yet [19:22] ^^ [19:22] yeah. let me know [19:22] give me some minutes :D [19:22] asac: I suppose... Firefox is not using plain GTK libs for it's GUI, right? So, that might be the source of the "problem" [19:23] asac: deadline is tomorrow right? [19:23] Jazzva: i don't hink that there is anything like "tabs" in gtk lib [19:23] so there is no standard for that imo [19:23] thats why i doubt that its really a bug [19:23] sebner: tomorrow is good.... i will not refuse extensions finished by sat though [19:23] asac: I played only a bit with it, so I'm assuming :). Never mind... [19:24] asac: Ah I'll finish today :D to make mighty alexander happy :P [19:24] sebner: gives us a better chance to still fix things in time for hardy [19:24] cool [19:24] ;) [19:32] asac: where should the MPL1.1 license file should be placed? /usr/share/all-in-one-sidebar/ is bad or? [19:33] sebner: just put it in the debian/ directory and create a file called debian/docs where you add "MPL" [19:34] that will take care of the right place [19:34] asac: debian/rules can face that? [19:34] sebner: it will consider debian/docs automatically [19:35] asac: nice :D :D :D [19:35] sebner: like in xulrunner we have: [19:35] $ cat debian/docs [19:35] debian/MPL [19:35] asac: and where is it situated after installation? [19:35] and it ends up in /usr/share/doc/xulrunner-1.9/MPL.gz [19:35] nice :D [19:35] so ... it just happens automatically === jetsaredim_ is now known as jetsaredim [19:45] asac: not working :( It doesn't get included [20:10] sebner: debhelper.mk is included, right? [20:11] yep [20:11] I will upload the new revision. maybe you can look at it [20:12] maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL = debian/MPL [20:13] maybe set DEB_INSTALL_DOCS_ALL := debian/MPL [20:13] but it should work imo [20:13] I'll try [20:13] yeah .. try that [20:14] Files named debian/package.docs can list other files to be installed. [20:15] maybe use that instead of just debian/docs [20:15] but it works in xulrunner ... so no idea [20:22] asac: No way Oo [20:23] strange ... where is the branch? [20:23] asac: bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sebner/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu [20:24] there is neither docs nor MPL in that ;) [20:25] asac: ah not the actual one [20:25] sebner: all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu$ ls debian/all-in-one-sidebar/usr/share/doc/all-in-one-sidebar/ [20:25] changelog.Debian.gz copyright MPL.gz [20:25] thjat works [20:25] just like i said [20:26] wtf? [20:27] sebner: bazaar.launchpad.net/~asac/firefox-extensions/all-in-one-sidebar.ubuntu [20:27] i pushed it there [20:27] you can just merge that to your branch [20:27] asac: but if I build the package myself it isn't working? [20:27] and then take a look at the diff [20:32] asac: I thought MPL should be in debian/docs? [20:32] no look ;) [20:32] 20:35 < asac> sebner: like in xulrunner we have: [20:32] 20:35 < asac> $ cat debian/docs [20:32] 20:35 < asac> debian/MPL [20:33] sebner: anyway ... do a bzr merge ... + commit [20:33] how to merge ^^ [20:33] bzr merge "BRANCHURL" [20:33] then review changes [20:33] resolve eventual conflicts [20:33] then bzr commit [20:33] and provide a reasonable merge message [20:34] buh [20:34] e.g. merge fix for XYZ from branch URL revision XXX" [20:34] would be easier when I just move my MPL file ^^ [20:34] yeah, but its about doing simple things in bzr right now [20:34] ;) [20:34] ^^ [20:35] whjich was one of the other objectives of this it guess [20:36] ;) [20:44] asac: uploaded but I made some mistakes ^^. The Changelog looks horrible. Maybe I should start from scratch again? [21:15] sebner: doesn't look that bad ... what do you mean? [21:15] asac: hmm. n00b alarm [21:15] ^^ [21:16] you should not use comments like "Small fix" [21:16] but there are always things to improve [21:16] sebner: you committed the merge twice? [21:16] asac: As I said. "Noob alarm" ;) [21:17] ok [21:17] but the current head looks alright [21:17] so lets not bother [21:17] sebner: there is one more thing left. please add the review/sponsor bug to the changelog entry [21:18] e.g. LP: #xxxx [21:18] ^^ [21:18] we need that so ftp admins can figure the Ack and the FF exception [21:18] Everytime I started a new kind of motu work I sucked and I have no problem with starting again [21:18] he? [21:18] don't need to start ;) [21:19] ^^ [21:19] asac: example bug report for me? [21:19] just add the bug to debian/changelog [21:19] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/ [21:19] there are some [21:19] please file one for you extension so i can document the FF exception and ackknowledge that this has been reviewed [21:21] fta2: btw, the application dialog has been fixed by the .autoreg fix [21:22] fta2: except if you don't have the gnome-support package [21:22] but i cannot fix that for this upload i guess [21:22] i currently have no real clue what should happen if ther eis no gnome-support [21:22] (code-wise) [21:30] asac: it's totally new to me? Besides that you are here. Set it to new or confirmed? [21:31] sebner: New [21:31] asac: And subscribe ...? [21:33] asac: Mozilla Team? [21:34] yes [21:35] done [21:36] sebner: ok. does install.rdf have maxVersion 3.0.* ? [21:36] if not please do that ... otherwise we need to upload on every new ffox update ;) [21:37] maxVersion="1.1.* [21:37] xD [21:37] xD [21:37] xD [21:38] ah [21:38] no wait [21:38] there are two of them [21:38] Hmm I should change this one with 3.0b4 [21:38] for the firefox targetApplication [21:38] yes most likely [21:38] 3.0.* [21:38] the maxVersion should read [21:38] you can change that in ubuntu branch [22:08] asac, what if extension is not compatible, but is installable, since it depends on firefox? Should we just update the Depends line to "firefox-2"? [22:11] Jazzva: is not compatbile even if you boost the maxVersion? [22:11] in install.rdf? [22:12] haven't tried... But I have disabled checkCompatibility in Firefox. It shows the sidebar, but it's not reacting on buttons... [22:12] ah ok [22:12] then its not compatible? [22:12] nothing newer? [22:12] somewhere? [22:12] asac: already looked at it? [22:12] So, I suppose it's not compatible... nope, neither on addons.mozilla.org, nor on mozdev.org, where their webpage is [22:13] sebner: is it ready? [22:13]