| fta | oh, i need nspr/nss too. damn, this needs concentration | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | lol ;) | 00:00 |
| asac | i know what you mean | 00:00 |
| fta | damn versions | 00:00 |
| asac | do you still have a version skew? | 00:00 |
| asac | in your ppa? | 00:00 |
| fta | nss only | 00:00 |
| fta | nspr is ok now | 00:00 |
| asac | yes i know | 00:00 |
| asac | can't you delete nss packages once and for all so this can get back in line? | 00:01 |
| asac | you could upload an intermediate xul with tight dependencies to bring folks tracking your ppa in line again | 00:01 |
| asac | (but please not in bzr ;)) | 00:01 |
| asac | no idea if apt will refuse to downgrade on upgrade though :/ | 00:02 |
| fta | all my ppa uploads are in distinct branches | 00:02 |
| fta | it will not, packages will be on hold | 00:02 |
| fta | mozilla bug 420151 | 00:03 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 420151 in Security: PSM "FF3Beta5 should use updated NSS tag NSS_3_12_BETA3" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420151 | 00:03 |
| fta | + "Also updating NSPR tag to NSPR_4_7_1_BETA2" | 00:03 |
| fta | ok, at least it's clear this time | 00:03 |
| asac | fta: they will be on hold? why not just downgrade ;) | 00:04 |
| fta | apt never downgrades by itself | 00:04 |
| asac | anyway, i understand i guess | 00:04 |
| asac | yeah thats what i doubted above | 00:04 |
| asac | lets look at blocker bugs :) | 00:08 |
| asac | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_contact=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.milestone%3Alist=829&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_cve.used=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&search=Search | 00:09 |
| asac | thats firefox | 00:09 |
| fta | i have cairo 1.5.16 to do too | 00:09 |
| asac | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_contact=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.milestone%3Alist=829&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_cve.used=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&search=Search | 00:09 |
| asac | thats xul | 00:09 |
| asac | for firefox i only see bug 185622 as not yet triaged | 00:09 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 185622 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 doesn't act as the default browser" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185622 | 00:09 |
| asac | can we close bug 194342 | 00:10 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 194342 in xulrunner-1.9 "review make install target and package-static files" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194342 | 00:10 |
| asac | fta: ? | 00:10 |
| asac | i would say yes, not sure though | 00:10 |
| fta | seb128 asked me if I wanted to do it | 00:10 |
| fta | (cairo) | 00:10 |
| asac | yes, please try to look for rendering regressions ;) | 00:10 |
| asac | fta: seb is open to apply bug 175904 | 00:11 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 175904 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175904 | 00:11 |
| asac | in metacity | 00:11 |
| fta | good | 00:11 |
| asac | he said, that we should do that ;) | 00:11 |
| fta | for 194342, I need to rerun compare | 00:11 |
| asac | fta: where is compare? in moz-devscripts? | 00:11 |
| fta | yes | 00:11 |
| asac | can't we run that by default now? | 00:11 |
| asac | so we can look at buildd logs regularaly? | 00:11 |
| fta | we can if we hook after the debs are built | 00:12 |
| asac | hmm | 00:12 |
| asac | given that even binary-post-install didn't work ;) | 00:12 |
| asac | fta: if that hook works you can inspect the unpacked hierarchies? | 00:12 |
| asac | is that ok? | 00:12 |
| asac | debs are not yet packed though iirc | 00:13 |
| asac | i think thats the last time we can do anything without adding other hooks to cdbs | 00:13 |
| fta | I need the full debian/{pkg*} populated | 00:13 |
| asac | thats the case at that point | 00:14 |
| fta | "Cairo now depends on pixman 0.10.0 which was recently released" | 00:14 |
| fta | hmm | 00:14 |
| asac | so another reason why the lp- hook doesn't work | 00:14 |
| asac | i think we need that as well then | 00:15 |
| fta | !info pixman hardy | 00:15 |
| ubotu | Package pixman does not exist in hardy | 00:15 |
| fta | pfff | 00:15 |
| asac | !info libpixman-1-0 hardy | 00:15 |
| ubotu | Package libpixman-1-0 does not exist in hardy | 00:15 |
| fta | !info libpixman-1-0 hardy | 00:15 |
| fta | hihi | 00:15 |
| asac | !info libpixman-1-0 | 00:15 |
| ubotu | Package libpixman-1-0 does not exist in gutsy | 00:15 |
| fta | 0.9.6-1 | 00:15 |
| asac | !info pixman | 00:15 |
| ubotu | Package pixman does not exist in gutsy | 00:15 |
| asac | !info flood excess | 00:15 |
| ubotu | Package flood does not exist in gutsy | 00:15 |
| asac | zillions of rdepends ... great | 00:16 |
| asac | i wonder if cairo is ever going to release | 00:17 |
| asac | or if they really wait for firefox to finish | 00:17 |
| fta | Increase the precision of color stops for gradients. This fixes a | 00:17 |
| fta | regression in gradient rendering that had been present since the | 00:17 |
| fta | 1.5.12 snapshot. | 00:17 |
| asac | who cares about gradients ;) | 00:18 |
| asac | i want backgrounds :) | 00:18 |
| asac | repeat reflect ones with acceleration ;) | 00:18 |
| asac | and fixed image rendering :( | 00:18 |
| fta | This is definitely a "release candidate" snapshot for cairo 1.6.0 | 00:20 |
| Jazzva | asac, I've ran through list of already packaged extensions. There are 3 that needs to be repackaged with xpi.mk, some of them are compat with checkCompatibility off. Few of them are noncompat, and there are few left that I need to check some more. | 00:20 |
| fta | At this point all significant items from the cairo 1.6.0 roadmap are already in this snapshot. | 00:20 |
| asac | Jazzva: can you document your findings somewhere? | 00:21 |
| Jazzva | Two extensions are repaced with newer extensions, but with different names. What should we do in that case? Make the first package dummy, and make a new one for replacement? | 00:21 |
| Jazzva | *replaced | 00:21 |
| Jazzva | And I think there are few more, that weren't in this list, so I'll take a look at that tomorrow, if that's ok. | 00:21 |
| asac | we need to categorize extensions in "upgradable", "upgradable with maxVersion fix" and "firefox 2" | 00:21 |
| asac | so we can move the ones not compatible to only depend on firefox-2 | 00:22 |
| Jazzva | Sure, I can... I'll do it now. | 00:22 |
| asac | and fix th others | 00:22 |
| Jazzva | Should I put them on the FF3Extensions wiki page? | 00:22 |
| Jazzva | Is that the right place? | 00:22 |
| asac | yeah ... maybe add a new table (Existing Extensions summary) | 00:23 |
| asac | or something | 00:23 |
| asac | field like " Name", Homepage, compatible (yes, no, compatibility fixed), hardy status (open/done) | 00:24 |
| asac | and maybe "Ubuntu Contact" | 00:24 |
| Jazzva | k, thanks :) | 00:24 |
| asac | which means that someone is working on the getting it done ;) | 00:24 |
| cosmodad | I'm trying to get to know how the thunderbird package in Ubuntu builds and need some help. Basically, my final goal is to add a patch to the TB package, so I downloaded the source package. | 01:11 |
| cosmodad | Since this is my first approach to quilt, I wanted to see how quilt-patching works and did a `quilt push' after unpacking the source tarball. | 01:11 |
| cosmodad | When I try so, however, I get a "can't find file to patch at input line X" error. Is there something else I need to do to have quilt apply the existing patches? | 01:11 |
| asac | cosmodad: you can only push in build-tree/mozilla i guess | 01:15 |
| cosmodad | asac: hm. When I unpacked the mozilla tarball, it created a `mozilla' dir. Do I need to move that somewhere? Or move debian/ into mozilla/ ? | 01:16 |
| cosmodad | asac: is that what you mean? | 01:16 |
| asac | why don't you use our package? | 01:20 |
| asac | cosmodad: you have to start the build and abort when patching is over | 01:20 |
| asac | then you can work "normally" in build-tree/mozilla/ | 01:20 |
| asac | if the package was in source | 01:21 |
| asac | tarball in source orig i mean | 01:21 |
| asac | if it was just a normal orig, just linking debian/patches is enough | 01:21 |
| cosmodad | asac: because I believe that the following patch isn't included in the hardy yet: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278383 | 01:21 |
| asac | or telling quilt that the patches dir is there | 01:21 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 278383 in MailNews: Movemail "Get All New Messages doesn't work with movemail account" [Normal,Assigned] | 01:21 |
| cosmodad | asac: oh you mean why I don't use your source package? I do use that. | 01:22 |
| asac | ok | 01:22 |
| asac | then use the instructions above | 01:22 |
| cosmodad | asac: so how'd I interrupt the build process right after patches have been applied? | 01:23 |
| asac | ctrl+c :) | 01:23 |
| cosmodad | oh, ok. | 01:23 |
| asac | if the build starts its not a problem .. .just abort | 01:23 |
| asac | there is also a "patch" target or something in rules | 01:23 |
| asac | no idea how its called though ;) | 01:23 |
| asac | its somewhere in cdbs i guess | 01:23 |
| cosmodad | asac: can't I just use quilt to apply my new patch, add that to debian/patches and have CDBS run all over again? | 01:24 |
| cosmodad | that'd save me the hassle of finding the right spot for CTRL+C interruption... | 01:25 |
| cosmodad | right now, I temporarily moved debian/ into mozilla/ and set QUILT_PATCHES to debian/patches, but I'm not sure if that is the canonical approach. | 01:26 |
| asac | you can do whatever you want ... ctrl+c is not a problem though ;) | 01:26 |
| asac | you can also work somewhere else and copy the patches dir in there | 01:27 |
| asac | but doing it in build hierarchy without creating too much clutter is the preferable way imo ;) | 01:27 |
| cosmodad | okey | 01:28 |
| cosmodad | I'll try "my" way first though because I'm curious and want to check whether it works. :) | 01:28 |
| asac | i'd just copy the patches directory | 01:29 |
| asac | not the complete debian one | 01:29 |
| asac | actually better create a link | 01:29 |
| cosmodad | sounds reasonable. | 01:30 |
| cosmodad | and worked. :) | 01:32 |
| cosmodad | asac: are you by chance quite familiar with quilt and mind if I ask you a question about it? | 01:32 |
| Jazzva | asac: Done <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions>. There are two new lists at the and of the page. Any suggestions? | 01:32 |
| asac | Jazzva: isn't adblock plus already uplaoded? | 01:33 |
| asac | i think its new though | 01:33 |
| asac | Jazzva: Live HTTP Headers works? | 01:34 |
| Jazzva | Dunno... I searched the bug reports, but I haven't found one. Haven't checked the changelogs.ubuntu.com, though... | 01:34 |
| asac | thats good news | 01:34 |
| asac | Jazzva: $ apt-cache search adblock plus | 01:34 |
| asac | adblock-plus - advertisement blocking extension for web browsers | 01:34 |
| asac | mozilla-firefox-adblock - advertisement blocking extension for web browsers (dummy package) | 01:34 |
| Jazzva | asac: I think it does... I haven't used it before, so I'm not sure if that was live http headers what I thought :) | 01:34 |
| asac | so its in (its NEW) | 01:34 |
| asac | Jazzva: you can see the http headers :) | 01:35 |
| Jazzva | Oh, I see... I'll remove it from the list then... | 01:35 |
| asac | could you do that? | 01:35 |
| asac | (monitoring http headers) | 01:35 |
| Jazzva | Hmm... I haven't found the option. Lemme see... | 01:36 |
| asac | Jazzva: actually adblock-plus replaces adblock (thats why there is the dummy package) | 01:36 |
| Jazzva | yep | 01:36 |
| Jazzva | I can see them :) | 01:36 |
| asac | so maybe suitable for the laste table | 01:36 |
| Jazzva | Host: en.wikipedia.org ... etc | 01:36 |
| asac | yeah ... you should see a a bunch of headers | 01:37 |
| asac | like GET /xxxx | 01:37 |
| asac | if that works. great | 01:37 |
| Jazzva | yep... | 01:37 |
| Jazzva | Ok, I'll then just move adblock plus to the last table and I'm off for tonight :). I'll try to package two or three tomorrow afternoon. What's the deadline? | 01:38 |
| Jazzva | *then I'll | 01:38 |
| asac | tomorrow evening would be great ... but sat is also fine ;) | 01:38 |
| asac | thanks | 01:38 |
| asac | i go to bed now ;) | 01:38 |
| Jazzva | asac: Ok... No problem | 01:39 |
| Jazzva | Good night... | 01:39 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | ola | 08:40 |
| asac | fta: is nspr 4.7.0~1.9b5 ok? and nss 3.12.0~1.9b5 ? | 09:09 |
| asac | or should we tweak the nss version to help your ppa escape the trap? | 09:09 |
| asac | fta: let me know when moz devscripts is ready for upload | 09:11 |
| asac | it should go up first obviously ;) | 09:11 |
| asac | phoenix24: jetsaredim_: firebug, firefox-showcase and mozgest are in the archive now | 09:58 |
| asac | phoenix24: jetsaredim_: please close your bugs once they are built and available on the mirrors ;) | 09:58 |
| asac | jetsaredim_: phoenix24: and remember to look what i did to give them the final polish | 09:59 |
| phoenix24 | asac: ok! | 10:00 |
| phoenix24 | asac: I'll do it in about an hour, is that ok ? | 10:00 |
| asac | sure. outstanding sponsorships are useragentswitcher, imagezoom, all-in-one-sidebar and flashblock | 10:01 |
| asac | if i missed anything, let me know | 10:01 |
| asac | phoenix24: it probably takes an out anyway until its built and hits the mirrors | 10:01 |
| asac | s/out/hour/ | 10:01 |
| asac | ok -venkman and -dom-inspector are now unsupported for us | 10:36 |
| asac | (e.g. those binaries go back to universe) | 10:37 |
| fta | hi | 11:24 |
| fta | asac> ok -venkman and -dom-inspector are now unsupported for us <= how? | 11:25 |
| fta | 4.7.0~1.9b5 => 4.7.1~beta2~1.9b5 or better 4.7.1~beta2 as it's NSPR_4_7_1_BETA2 | 11:30 |
| fta | for nss, i have 3.12.0~cvs2008xx and the tag is NSS_3_12_BETA3, would 3.12~beta3 work ? | 11:31 |
| fta | no | 11:32 |
| asac | fta: they are now in universe | 11:38 |
| asac | binary demotion | 11:38 |
| fta | but they still need to be updated, right ? | 11:39 |
| fta | maxversion is too low | 11:39 |
| fta | asac, what do you think of nspr 4.7.1~beta2 ? | 11:41 |
| asac | fta: what happens aftewards? | 12:00 |
| asac | fta: i never used venkman? is that broken too? | 12:00 |
| fta | let me re-enable all my extensions... | 12:02 |
| fta | i miss live http headers and jsview | 12:02 |
| asac | jazzva said http headers works and just needs a maxversion bump | 12:02 |
| asac | he wanted to do that today afaik | 12:03 |
| asac | fta: ^^ | 12:03 |
| asac | jsview i don't know | 12:03 |
| asac | you can test with the compatibility check disabled (like described on ffox3extension wiki page) | 12:03 |
| fta | jsview was ok in b4 so i guess it's just maxversion bump | 12:04 |
| asac | fta: is that from AMO ? | 12:04 |
| fta | http://forum.softwareblaze.com/ | 12:05 |
| fta | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2076 | 12:06 |
| fta | bug 209035 | 12:07 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 209035 in firefox-3.0 "cannot subscribe to RSS feeds" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209035 | 12:07 |
| fta | is that what i've fixed ? | 12:07 |
| fta | venkman is ok. dom is not | 12:08 |
| fta | bug 210003 | 12:14 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 210003 in firefox-3.0 "Loss of whitespace in text entry" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210003 | 12:14 |
| asac | fta: does dom really need anything except a maxVersion fix? | 12:15 |
| fta | i don't think so. amo bumps maxVersion automatically without requiring authors to re upload their stuff | 12:16 |
| asac | it does? | 12:18 |
| fta | authors just need to click on something | 12:18 |
| asac | well | 12:19 |
| asac | yeah. we have bump in advance ;) | 12:19 |
| === ZrZ is now known as RzR | ||
| asac | i feel hate against this plugin wizard thing ;) | 12:21 |
| fta | http://blog.mozilla.com/basil/2008/03/26/availability-of-new-addons.mozilla.org-amo-site/ | 12:21 |
| fta | bug 211315 | 12:22 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 211315 in update-manager "Unable to upgrade from 7:10 to 8:04" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/211315 | 12:22 |
| fta | Bug 204753 | 12:23 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 204753 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox shown in wrong menu" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/204753 | 12:23 |
| fta | asac, could agree on something for nspr/nss versions so I can close moz devscripts ? | 12:24 |
| fta | could we | 12:24 |
| fta | bug 206191 | 12:25 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 206191 in firefox-3.0 "[hardy beta] Firefox 3.0b4 "set as Desktop background" does not respond" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206191 | 12:25 |
| fta | oh, assigned to you :) | 12:25 |
| fta | Bug 209794 | 12:28 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 209794 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox-3 does not clear private data" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209794 | 12:28 |
| fta | this is bad | 12:28 |
| asac | does not clear private data? | 12:34 |
| asac | fta: i am fine with the ~beta thing i guess | 12:34 |
| asac | we could use ~beta2+1.9pre1 in case the release RC1 with a non-tagged NSS | 12:35 |
| asac | (as worst case) | 12:35 |
| asac | what are the negative implications? | 12:35 |
| fta | none that I can see | 12:35 |
| asac | ok lets use that then | 12:38 |
| asac | what is the current nspr version? | 12:38 |
| fta | 4.7.0~1.9b4-0ubuntu1 | 12:39 |
| asac | they don't have a tag yet? | 12:40 |
| fta | we need NSPR_4_7_1_BETA2 and NSS_3_12_BETA3 for b5 | 12:41 |
| asac | are we sure that BETA2 is used in b5 ? | 12:41 |
| asac | (for nss) | 12:41 |
| asac | aeh | 12:41 |
| asac | beta3 | 12:41 |
| asac | ok | 12:41 |
| fta | mozilla bug 420151 | 12:41 |
| asac | if we are sure that they have those tags in synch, then we can go for it | 12:41 |
| ubotu | Mozilla bug 420151 in Security: PSM "FF3Beta5 should use updated NSS tag NSS_3_12_BETA3" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420151 | 12:41 |
| asac | beta > 1 right? | 12:42 |
| asac | yeah | 12:42 |
| asac | ok | 12:42 |
| fta | ? | 12:42 |
| asac | all ok ... 4.7.0~beta2 is higher than 4.7.0~1.9 | 12:43 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 4.7.0~1.9b4-0ubuntu1 lt 4.7.1~beta2-0ubuntu1 && echo OK || echo NOK | 12:45 |
| fta | OK | 12:45 |
| fta | question is more on nss | 12:45 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 3.12.0~1.9b4-0ubuntu1 lt 3.12.0~beta3-0ubuntu1 && echo OK || echo NOK | 12:46 |
| fta | OK | 12:46 |
| fta | fta@ix:~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 3.12.0~cvs lt 3.12.0~beta3-0ubuntu1 && echo OK || echo NOK | 12:46 |
| fta | NOK | 12:46 |
| asac | yeah | 12:47 |
| asac | but thats the cvs problem | 12:47 |
| asac | can't your users accept the burden to get on hold? | 12:47 |
| fta | sure | 12:47 |
| asac | ok ... then lets not care? | 12:47 |
| fta | ok, fine with me | 12:47 |
| asac | and you upload xulrunner-1.9 with tight depends next time to ~fta | 12:47 |
| asac | (for a month or so ... so your users have some time to notice) | 12:47 |
| fta | you just scare them each you send them to my ppa ;) | 12:47 |
| asac | huh? | 12:48 |
| asac | i am doing that? | 12:48 |
| fta | yes :) | 12:48 |
| asac | well ... i think last time i did that because of nss ;) | 12:48 |
| asac | but that should be done soon | 12:48 |
| asac | question is for how long ;) | 12:49 |
| fta | [reed], do you know when the nss guys plan to release 3.12.0 final ? | 12:49 |
| asac | and even moblin folks are using your repo now that i send them there for midbrowser with xul testing :) | 12:50 |
| fta | :) | 12:50 |
| asac | fta: ask kaie (or kengert?) on moznet | 12:50 |
| asac | but i guess they tag in sync with ffox | 12:51 |
| fta | not until now | 12:51 |
| asac | yeah ... but i think 3.12 is targetted to be in sync with it | 12:51 |
| asac | they just skipped a bunch of intermediate steps | 12:52 |
| fta | at least, except for b5, it was always strange HEAD tags | 12:52 |
| asac | yeah | 12:52 |
| asac | because they have far less developers and hate branches and all that | 12:52 |
| asac | so they just said: use whatever you want for now ;) | 12:52 |
| asac | *argh* | 13:31 |
| asac | plugin scanner still not working | 13:31 |
| asac | whats up? | 13:31 |
| asac | hehe | 13:42 |
| asac | lets enable plugin.allow_alien_star_handler | 13:42 |
| asac | :) | 13:42 |
| asac | just because the name is funny | 13:43 |
| fta | asac, did you find the root cause of the missing app helper in ff3 ? | 13:43 |
| asac | yes | 13:44 |
| asac | for gnome-support it was just that gnomevfs was not registered | 13:45 |
| fta | fixed ? | 13:46 |
| asac | yes | 13:46 |
| asac | i am now on kubuntu-devel to get testers for non libgnomevfs setups | 13:46 |
| asac | if it doesn't work with upstream build then its hard to fix ... otherwise we might have a chance | 13:47 |
| asac | but i think they dropped all the mailcap logic | 13:47 |
| asac | so chances are high that it doesn't work without gnomevfs | 13:47 |
| asac | fta: so i mozill-devscripts ready for prime time? | 13:50 |
| fta | not yet, i was on pixman | 13:53 |
| asac | k | 13:53 |
| fta | a lot of context switches today | 13:53 |
| asac | yay ... multi-tasking ;) | 13:55 |
| asac | yay ... upstream plugin finder wizard cannot install flash at all | 13:56 |
| asac | great | 13:56 |
| asac | now i can't see if its a regression for us that xulrunner plugins are not auto detected after install | 13:56 |
| asac | i love it | 13:57 |
| * asac goes for fresh profile | 13:57 | |
| asac | [reed]: b5 does indeed not install the flash plugin through your plugin finder wizard | 14:01 |
| asac | it bails out with something like "install-XX.rdf is not well-formed ... giving up in shame" | 14:01 |
| fta | ok, i'm done with pixman and cairo, moving to mozilla devscripts | 14:58 |
| fta | asac, mozilla devscripts closed | 15:18 |
| fta | asac, take #87, next is the reopen | 15:21 |
| fta | asac, hold on, nspr is not right in mozclient, it should now use + instead of ~ | 15:28 |
| asac | ok | 15:28 |
| asac | so thats it with "no uncommitting" on mt branches ;)? | 15:29 |
| asac | hehe | 15:29 |
| asac | ... again ;) | 15:29 |
| asac | but i think this falls in the "within 5 minutes" moratorium ;) | 15:30 |
| fta | yep | 15:30 |
| asac | tell me when's ready | 15:30 |
| asac | fta: where does it use + instead of ~ | 15:30 |
| asac | ? | 15:30 |
| asac | ithought we have 3.12.0~beta3 now | 15:31 |
| asac | ? | 15:31 |
| fta | nspr_4.7.1~beta2.orig.tar.gz | 15:31 |
| fta | nspr_4.7.1~beta2+1.9b5~cvs20080314t1505.orig.tar.gz | 15:31 |
| asac | yeah | 15:31 |
| asac | ah ok | 15:31 |
| asac | thats right | 15:31 |
| fta | hm, why is it still b5..... hmmmmm | 15:32 |
| asac | it should be pre1 or something now | 15:32 |
| asac | or just pre | 15:32 |
| asac | (we could name it rc) | 15:32 |
| asac | fta: i have one blocker bug i would be sure about that it works: checkout of dates on branches ;) | 15:33 |
| fta | cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:/cvsroot -q -z 3 co -P -A -D "2008/03/14 15:05 PST" mozilla/nsprpub mozilla/config/milestone.txt | 15:33 |
| asac | does that work? | 15:33 |
| asac | once 3.0 is released it will fork away from trunk | 15:33 |
| fta | hm, because nspr hasn't been touched in a while, milestone.txt is old | 15:33 |
| asac | and tracking that would be beneficial | 15:33 |
| asac | fta: i don't think its bad here :) | 15:33 |
| asac | in this particular situation | 15:34 |
| fta | yep, it's weird but it doesn't hurt | 15:34 |
| asac | ok, all fine now? | 15:34 |
| fta | not yet, committing.... | 15:35 |
| asac | please test one more time ;) | 15:37 |
| asac | i will just blindly upload it | 15:37 |
| fta | done | 15:43 |
| fta | works for me (tm) | 15:43 |
| fta | asac, go for it :) | 15:46 |
| fta | asac, i have nspr ready too | 15:51 |
| fta | nspr.head branch | 15:51 |
| fta | closed for 4.7.1~beta2-0ubuntu1 | 15:51 |
| asac | fta: i cannot merge down from that | 15:52 |
| asac | unless you started that branch again | 15:52 |
| fta | ? | 15:52 |
| fta | hm | 15:53 |
| asac | thats what i told you after release: no common ancestor | 15:53 |
| asac | maybe fork again and just copy over on top | 15:53 |
| fta | where is your branch then ? i was able to push to mt head without issue | 15:53 |
| asac | or do on top of current branch | 15:53 |
| asac | fta: mt head never had a common ancestor for me | 15:53 |
| fta | hm | 15:54 |
| asac | its just plain branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/nspr/nspr | 15:54 |
| asac | and and http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/nss/nss/ | 15:54 |
| fta | oh, ok. I'll fix that, it's just the 3rd time we encounter this issue | 15:54 |
| asac | fta: back in * RELEASE 3.12.0~1.9b3-0ubuntu1 to hardy you prepared the release on that branch | 15:55 |
| fta | that's nss | 15:55 |
| fta | i've just done nspr so far | 15:56 |
| asac | ah | 15:56 |
| asac | lets see | 15:56 |
| asac | fta: for nss please base on the main branch | 15:56 |
| fta | oh, i also need to merge nspr.head in plan nspr | 15:56 |
| asac | maybe replace your .head with that to finally eliminate that | 15:56 |
| fta | plain | 15:57 |
| asac | i can just commit that merge | 15:58 |
| asac | applies cleanly | 15:58 |
| fta | already done | 15:58 |
| asac | k | 15:58 |
| asac | fta: + * Refresh diverged patch: | 15:59 |
| asac | + - update debian/patches/99_configure.patch | 15:59 |
| asac | how did that end up in this branch now? | 15:59 |
| asac | ok i see+ | 15:59 |
| fta | from one of the 2 mergs | 16:00 |
| fta | merges | 16:00 |
| fta | nspr #24 | 16:01 |
| asac | fta: no symbol changes? | 16:02 |
| asac | in nspr? | 16:02 |
| fta | no | 16:02 |
| fta | it's pretty stable | 16:02 |
| asac | k | 16:02 |
| fta | in fact, the one you uploaded for b4 was already a 4.7.1 beta but you named it 4.7.0 | 16:03 |
| fta | merge nss.head into nss worked for me | 16:04 |
| fta | asac, it seems my nss branches matches those on LP, maybe yours don't, could you check ? | 16:07 |
| asac | which url are you using to full .head? | 16:14 |
| asac | pull | 16:14 |
| fta | ix:~/bzr/nss.head$ bzr pull | 16:17 |
| fta | Using saved location: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/nss/nss.head/ | 16:17 |
| fta | No revisions to pull. | 16:17 |
| fta | ix:~/bzr/nss$ bzr pull | 16:18 |
| fta | Using saved location: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/nss/nss/ | 16:18 |
| fta | No revisions to pull. | 16:18 |
| asac | ok i have the plugin autoreloading under control it appears | 16:20 |
| fta | asac, so, branches, which one is wrong? | 16:25 |
| fta | 156 new threads in the forum for hardy in just 36h | 16:29 |
| fta | 123 new commits in bonsai for the same period | 16:32 |
| asac | haha | 16:32 |
| asac | sorry dropped the ball on the branch | 16:32 |
| asac | let me see | 16:32 |
| asac | fta: | 16:33 |
| asac | $ bzr merge ../nspr.head/ | 16:33 |
| asac | WARNING: the 'deb822' top-level module is *DEPRECATED*, please use 'debian_bundle.deb822' | 16:33 |
| asac | bzr: ERROR: Branches have no common ancestor, and no merge base revision was specified. | 16:33 |
| asac | $ bzr push | 16:33 |
| asac | WARNING: the 'deb822' top-level module is *DEPRECATED*, please use 'debian_bundle.deb822' | 16:33 |
| asac | Using saved location: bzr+ssh://asac@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/nss/nss/ | 16:33 |
| asac | No new revisions to push. | 16:33 |
| asac | push branch: bzr+ssh://asac@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/nss/nss/ | 16:34 |
| asac | aeh :) | 16:34 |
| asac | i see the problem | 16:34 |
| asac | fta: i have now a ~cvs revision in changelog | 16:35 |
| fta | up to 20080319t1013 ? | 16:35 |
| asac | fta: +#MISSING: 3.12.0~1.9b4# __nss_InitLock_Util@NSSUTIL_3.12 3.12.0~1.9b3 | 16:35 |
| asac | +#MISSING: 3.12.0~1.9b4# secoid_Init@NSSUTIL_3.12 3.12.0~1.9b3 | 16:35 |
| asac | shouldn't those be removed from symbols file? | 16:35 |
| fta | i was planing to, once we have this branch issue sorted out | 16:36 |
| asac | fta: i already removed them in last merge | 16:36 |
| fta | ? | 16:36 |
| asac | well i did that independent i guess | 16:36 |
| asac | on nss branch | 16:37 |
| asac | for 1.9b4 | 16:37 |
| asac | fta: please remove that lines either on head or while merging | 16:38 |
| fta | k | 16:39 |
| fta | bug 44851 | 16:52 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 44851 in acroread "mozilla-acroread places Firefox plugin in "wrong" path" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44851 | 16:52 |
| asac | do we ship that? | 16:53 |
| fta | medibuntu | 16:53 |
| fta | asac, nss & nss.head ready | 16:59 |
| fta | tarballs are there: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/ | 17:02 |
| asac | i will produce them to test mozclient ;) | 17:05 |
| fta | ok | 17:05 |
| fta | the ff3 notification is still broken | 18:06 |
| fta | hm, maybe not, i had a ff process without window. | 18:08 |
| Jazzva | asac, dunno if you missed one new package, so I'm just reminding that firefox-greasemonkey is prepared... I just need to do a little change in debian/copyright. bug 205172 | 18:41 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 205172 in greasemonkey "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firefox-greasemonkey" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205172 | 18:41 |
| Jazzva | asac, pushed the new revision... | 18:46 |
| asac | Jazzva: wasn't it uploaded yet? | 18:58 |
| asac | strange | 18:58 |
| asac | ah you didn't add the firefox-extensions project ;) | 18:59 |
| Jazzva | asac, I need to add it too? Oh :). Anyway, I'm looking at the livehttpheaders now. The latest source is already in the repo, so I'll just bump the maxVersion and repackage it with xpi.mk. Sounds good? | 18:59 |
| Jazzva | s/add it/add that/ | 19:00 |
| asac | no i did it | 19:00 |
| Jazzva | Thanks... | 19:00 |
| asac | well my mail filter apparently sucks | 19:00 |
| asac | thoguth that mozailltaem was enough | 19:00 |
| asac | but isn't :) | 19:00 |
| Jazzva | Murphy's laws :) | 19:00 |
| asac | Jazzva: commented | 19:03 |
| Jazzva | thanks :)... | 19:03 |
| fta | asac, anything else needed for xul/ff ? | 19:39 |
| fta | asac, is that expected ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/6480/ | 19:45 |
| asac | do | 19:46 |
| asac | no | 19:46 |
| asac | but the contents appear to be correct | 19:49 |
| fta | i've hook up compare | 19:51 |
| asac | didn't i push blocklist? | 19:56 |
| fta | nope | 19:56 |
| asac | strange | 19:56 |
| fta | asac, would you let me close xul/ff ? you've closed the last two beta | 20:09 |
| asac | fta: hmm | 20:20 |
| asac | fta: you can close both now, but i will open one of them again for the plugin fix. i am not sure where it lands atm. there are multiple options. | 20:21 |
| fta_ | grr | 20:23 |
| asac | fta: hmm | 20:23 |
| asac | fta: you can close both now, but i will open one of them again for the plugin fix. i am not sure where it lands atm. there are multiple options. | 20:23 |
| fta_ | <fta> what is the impact ? | 20:23 |
| fta_ | <fta> bug id ? | 20:23 |
| asac | i hate this event things. | 20:23 |
| asac | i mean i am sure that i am currently bumping in the same issue that prevents us from setting arguments on the epiphany cert dialog | 20:24 |
| fta_ | I hate dsl daily disconnect, it's from another age | 20:24 |
| asac | thought you have fiber ;) | 20:24 |
| fta_ | nope | 20:25 |
| fta_ | i could, my area is eligible | 20:25 |
| fta_ | both closed | 20:31 |
| Jazzva | asac, I'm running into some problems. Imagezoom and LiveHTTPHeaders seems to be broken on beta4 (which I have in my chroot), but work fine od beta5(pre), where I tested them last night... | 20:32 |
| Jazzva | I'm testing some more to see where's the problem... | 20:32 |
| fta_ | asac, ^^ feel free to push. if you update b5, please do so in *.dev as I'm updating *.head with trunk. | 20:32 |
| asac | fta_: yes. did you merge over the b5 already? | 20:35 |
| asac | Jazzva: thats ok then. | 20:35 |
| asac | fta_: how recent is your b5 ? | 20:35 |
| asac | did you push today? so Jazzva can test that? | 20:36 |
| Jazzva | asac: I think I found the source, but I don't know how I missed it... | 20:36 |
| fta_ | asac, all the .dev and .head branches are in sync (nspr/nss/xul/ff) | 20:37 |
| fta_ | as for my ppa.. it's about 20h old | 20:38 |
| asac | Jazzva: if it works with fta ppa then all should be fine | 20:39 |
| fta_ | ppa: xulrunner-1.9.head #217 out of #222 and firefox-3.0.head #233 out of #238 | 20:39 |
| Jazzva | when I unzip the .jar file it rebuilds the chrome/ inside chrome/, so we have chrome/chrome/... which is why it's not working. Although, I'm sure I tested the deb :/... | 20:40 |
| Jazzva | I'll just add option to zip to skip the inclusion of chrome/ dir... | 20:40 |
| fta_ | ppa resynched... building | 21:02 |
| Jazzva | asac, should I change bzr url for mozilla-imagezoom to ~ubuntu-dev too? BTW, I fixed both imagezoom and livehttpheaders, I'll push them in the next few minutes... | 21:13 |
| Jazzva | Hmm, the xpi file produced for livehttpheaders works ok, but it fails when I install the deb... I get this error "Firefox could not install this item because of a failure in Chrome Registration. Please contact the author about this problem." Any ideas? | 21:28 |
| asac | Jazzva: yes. please | 21:30 |
| asac | everything that has Maintainer: ... MOTU | 21:30 |
| asac | needs ~ubuntu-dev | 21:30 |
| asac | Jazzva: any files not available in the deb that are in the .xpi? | 21:30 |
| Jazzva | I'll check it... | 21:31 |
| asac | Jazzva: is the extension ID correctly detected and encoded in the path in firefox-addons that links to it? | 21:31 |
| Jazzva | yep... | 21:32 |
| Jazzva | Checked the files, everything in xpi is in deb file (in /usr/share/mozilla-livehttpheaders/) /usr/lib/firefox{,-adons}/extensions/{id} are linking to /usr/share/mozilla-livehttpheaders | 21:40 |
| Jazzva | asac ^^ | 21:40 |
| Jazzva | and the id matches the one in install.rdf | 21:40 |
| Jazzva | i'll try to put it in rules, just to try that way... | 21:41 |
| Jazzva | nope, still the same... :/ | 21:44 |
| Jazzva | pushed imagezoom with corrected bzr url (~ubuntu-dev)... | 21:48 |
| Jazzva | greasemonkey too... | 21:49 |
| asac | Jazzva: push the livehttpheaders branch somewhere | 22:12 |
| asac | i can take a lok then | 22:12 |
| Jazzva | ok... | 22:12 |
| sebner | asac: aloha | 22:16 |
| Jazzva | asac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/firefox-extensions/mozilla-livehttpheaders.test | 22:18 |
| Jazzva | asac: I have to go now... We have some guests overnight, so they'll sleep in my room... Why didn't I get a laptop? I'll finish ctxextensions in the morning, it seems easy to package | 22:21 |
| Jazzva | Thanks for checking livehttpheaders :) | 22:21 |
| Jazzva | See ya later... night, all | 22:21 |
| asac | fta_: ok the first three are uploaded | 22:44 |
| asac | xul and ffox waiting for final testing ... same for ubufox | 22:44 |
| fta_ | excellent | 22:44 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| asac | fta: i will keep you in changelog for all as its not a two way fix, but a three way :) ... just bump the times | 22:45 |
| asac | can i push the xul changes to .head still? | 22:45 |
| fta | yes | 22:45 |
| asac | trying | 22:45 |
| asac | ok | 22:45 |
| sebner | asac: any progress with all in one sidebar? | 22:46 |
| fta | i'm working on a build system a-la-xul for prism 0.9 | 22:46 |
| asac | sebner: didn't i comment in bug? | 22:48 |
| asac | fta: what do you mean? like cdbs or upstream build system? | 22:48 |
| fta | no, configure.in, config/* build/autoconf/* etc | 22:49 |
| asac | fta: all pushed. lets hope the xul patch is really accurate now | 22:49 |
| fta | upstream build system | 22:49 |
| asac | you can move ahead anyway | 22:49 |
| asac | if there is something left ill do it in .dev | 22:49 |
| sebner | asac: your comment was "FFe: bug 193225" ^^ | 22:50 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 193225 in firefox-3.0 "FF: general exception for firefox 3 extension packages signed off by the mozillateam" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193225 | 22:50 |
| asac | sebner: ok confirmed | 22:51 |
| rzr | same for flashblock, what's next now ? | 22:52 |
| rzr | hi btw | 22:53 |
| fta | asac, upstream builds prism along with xul, I don't want that so i've made a --with-libxul-sdk build system | 22:53 |
| asac | sebner: look out for typos | 22:53 |
| asac | your version read ...ubntu1 | 22:53 |
| asac | i fixed that now before the push | 22:53 |
| asac | :) | 22:54 |
| sebner | asac: grr. bzr is surely nothing for me | 22:54 |
| asac | sebner: thats in changelog ... not related to bzr :) | 22:54 |
| sebner | asac: the use of bzr makes my nervous what leads to mistakes ;P | 22:55 |
| asac | sebner: haha :) | 22:57 |
| asac | just relax. | 22:57 |
| asac | before you commit you just look at bzr diff | 22:57 |
| asac | and remove any cruft | 22:57 |
| asac | thats quite comfortable :) | 22:57 |
| asac | rzr: ill look at yours next | 22:58 |
| asac | bug 211494 | 23:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 211494 in firefox-extensions "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor All in One Sidebar extension" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/211494 | 23:00 |
| sebner | asac: k, thanks so far. I'll take a look at it tomorrow/today. gn8 :D | 23:01 |
| asac | sebner: uploaded | 23:01 |
| sebner | asac: wuhu. first Orginal Maintainer field by me :D | 23:02 |
| sebner | asac: gn8 then :D | 23:02 |
| asac | fta: lintian complains about executable flag for all our idls | 23:04 |
| asac | maybe we should fix that | 23:04 |
| asac | W: xulrunner-1.9-dev: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/idl/xulrunner-1.9b5/unstable/nsIDOMLSException.idl | 23:04 |
| asac | like 100 times ;) | 23:04 |
| fta | lol | 23:05 |
| rzr | asac: ok thx | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!