| secretlondon | gnome | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| stephantom | that's odd, yeah | 00:01 |
| james_w | so I think it fails when trying to add CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_NET_RAW to it's capabilities. | 00:03 |
| james_w | that only happens if it was run set-uid or set-gid | 00:05 |
| james_w | apparently | 00:05 |
| james_w | stephantom: is kdesu a suid program? | 00:06 |
| stephantom | james_w, sorry, I don't know. can I check that somehow? | 00:07 |
| james_w | stephantom: ls -l /usr/bin/kdesu | 00:08 |
| james_w | if it is -rwsr-xr-x then it is | 00:08 |
| james_w | i.e. it is s in the fourth place, not x | 00:08 |
| stephantom | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2008-04-05 00:08 /usr/bin/kdesu -> kdesudo | 00:09 |
| stephantom | gksu: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23016 2007-12-05 19:41 /usr/bin/gksu | 00:09 |
| james_w | what's kdesudo? | 00:10 |
| james_w | I mean what's the permissions on it? | 00:10 |
| james_w | also "lsmod | grep capa" please. | 00:10 |
| stephantom | -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68736 2008-03-28 15:43 /usr/bin/kdesudo | 00:11 |
| stephantom | lsmod | grep capa returns nothing | 00:11 |
| james_w | ok, "sudo modprobe capability" please | 00:12 |
| james_w | and try again | 00:12 |
| stephantom | FATAL: Module capability not found. | 00:13 |
| james_w | ah, ok | 00:13 |
| james_w | I was reading http://fixunix.com/mandriva/323379-wireshark-2008-0-a.html | 00:14 |
| james_w | stephantom: what's your kernel version? | 00:16 |
| stephantom | 2.6.24-14-generic | 00:16 |
| james_w | secretlondon: can I ask what your kernel version is as well please? | 00:16 |
| secretlondon | sure | 00:16 |
| james_w | ok, what is your kernel version? :-) | 00:16 |
| secretlondon | i've forgotten the command for that | 00:17 |
| secretlondon | arrgh | 00:17 |
| stephantom | uname -a | 00:17 |
| secretlondon | ta | 00:17 |
| secretlondon | Linux celery 2.6.24-14-generic #1 SMP | 00:17 |
| secretlondon | I can re check on my machine | 00:17 |
| james_w | you are using the (as root) option from the menu? | 00:18 |
| secretlondon | yes | 00:18 |
| secretlondon | you can't capture otherwise | 00:18 |
| secretlondon | i'm using ppp though | 00:19 |
| secretlondon | as it's a usb hsdpa modem | 00:19 |
| secretlondon | ah but currently I don't have any interfaces available in the program.. | 00:21 |
| secretlondon | it worked a couple of weeks ago | 00:21 |
| james_w | I wonder if it's the .24 kernel? | 00:22 |
| secretlondon | I wonder if it network manager | 00:22 |
| stephantom | I'm not using network manager | 00:22 |
| secretlondon | as I've had loads of problems with things thinking I am offline, and now nm thinks I am online permanentky | 00:22 |
| Nafallo | will they release a new NM soon? | 00:24 |
| james_w | http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288 is kind of the bug. | 00:24 |
| ubotu | bugs.wireshark.org bug 2288 in Wireshark "Selecting multiple files with any options creates an error <Child capture process exited: exit status 2>" [Major,Resolved: fixed] | 00:24 |
| Nafallo | like... 7 :-) | 00:24 |
| james_w | it fixes the hanging problem, and the capset problem is described, but not dealt with apparently. | 00:25 |
| stephantom | james_w, shouldn't that fix already be in the 1.0.0 release? | 00:26 |
| secretlondon | my capture interfaces is blank for some reason | 00:27 |
| secretlondon | I clearly have ppp0 | 00:28 |
| * secretlondon sighs | 00:28 | |
| stephantom | secretlondon, that happens to me if I run wireshark as standard user | 00:28 |
| secretlondon | you are right, I seem to have lost my run as root menu entry | 00:29 |
| * secretlondon realises they are not being very helpful | 00:29 | |
| stephantom | join the club in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireshark/+bug/209084 :D | 00:30 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 209084 in wireshark "no run as root in menu in hardy" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 00:30 |
| james_w | stephantom: I don't know. | 00:31 |
| james_w | hmm, I've got one | 00:31 |
| stephantom | me too | 00:31 |
| secretlondon | I got a window popping up warning me about running stuff as root, which i needed to close to use the app | 00:31 |
| secretlondon | but I'm currently capturing packets on ppp0 and started wireshark using gksudo from the cli | 00:31 |
| james_w | weird. Thanks secretlondon | 00:33 |
| james_w | I've got to sleep though. Night all. | 00:33 |
| stephantom | the capabilities module was merged into the kernel in .24, right? | 00:33 |
| secretlondon | I think some of the 'freezing' may be people not closing the window, as you get the busy cursor and no response nuntil you do | 00:33 |
| secretlondon | night james_w | 00:34 |
| stephantom | all right, night. thanks james_w | 00:34 |
| stephantom | I'll update the bug report in launchpad with our findings | 00:35 |
| sdh | yay bugs | 00:46 |
| secretlondon | oh yes! | 00:47 |
| secretlondon | ah wireshark has now frozen when I tried to capture using any | 00:51 |
| * secretlondon scratches head | 00:51 | |
| stephantom | yay, finally, now you see how we felt for the last 2-3 hours | 00:52 |
| stephantom | sdh, bugs? only 41415 open ones to pick from... | 00:52 |
| sdh | stephantom: i meant the hug day email :> | 00:52 |
| secretlondon | capture on eth0 hasn't frozen, but I admit I don't actually have a cable in | 00:52 |
| stephantom | yay hug day | 00:53 |
| secretlondon | capturing on lo fine too | 00:53 |
| secretlondon | and any without the promiscuous mode flag set | 00:54 |
| secretlondon | but I reset the flag and it's fine | 00:55 |
| secretlondon | arrgh for random bugs | 00:55 |
| stephantom | secretlondon, try opening the 'Interfaces' window | 00:55 |
| stephantom | and start a capture from there | 00:56 |
| secretlondon | okay | 00:56 |
| secretlondon | closing the interfaces window has caused it to freeze, during the capture that was ok | 00:56 |
| stephantom | now that's what we were talking about | 00:57 |
| stephantom | and I bet that after killing wireshark you'll still have a dumpcap process lurking around | 00:57 |
| secretlondon | okay, restarting and using interfaces it froze again | 00:58 |
| Plantain | Hey, I've got no sound on Hardy with an Intel chipset. I've searched the lauchpad and found many seemingly loosely related bugs, but I'm not sure if I should file my own or just add to someone elses? | 00:58 |
| stephantom | alternatively, you can kill the dumpcap process. then the capture will work. | 00:58 |
| secretlondon | when I closed all the windows it didn't give me back the cli, needed to ctrl-c | 00:58 |
| secretlondon | I have multiple wireshark and dumpcap processes | 01:01 |
| stephantom | I'm going to bed now, suggest you kill all your leftofter wireshark/dumpcap processes ;-) happy hunting! | 01:07 |
| stephantom | that should be "leftover" | 01:08 |
| stephantom | I'm getting tried | 01:08 |
| stephantom | bye | 01:08 |
| greg-g | is it tomorrow somewhere in the world? | 01:10 |
| greg-g | oh wait, the hug day isn't until tuesday of course | 01:10 |
| greg-g | nevermind | 01:11 |
| secretlondon | yeah it's saturday here | 01:12 |
| greg-g | I accidently started on some of the bugs on the hugday list :) | 01:13 |
| greg-g | I just saw wiki page of bugs and thought "oooo! time to start triaging!" | 01:13 |
| LaserJock | tsk tsk | 01:14 |
| LaserJock | we can't just have people fixing bug willy nilly | 01:14 |
| secretlondon | we could fix them all before the hug day | 01:17 |
| secretlondon | as there is no way there is only 100 bugs without packages ;) | 01:17 |
| LaserJock | that would be hilarious | 01:17 |
| LaserJock | "so ... uh ... whada we do now?" | 01:17 |
| * secretlondon points at launchpad | 01:18 | |
| greg-g | :) | 01:18 |
| * greg-g is off, take care | 01:18 | |
| secretlondon | bye greg-g | 01:19 |
| greg-g | tah tah secretlondon | 01:19 |
| === Spec is now known as x-spec-t | ||
| === jjesse_ is now known as jjesse | ||
| graphx | Hello all | 04:47 |
| graphx | I have a question. Anyone have experience with pulseaudio? | 04:48 |
| graphx | Reason I as is I want to make sure what I am running in to is not a bug... | 04:49 |
| Iulian | G'morning | 07:21 |
| Joe520 | hi all | 08:11 |
| Joe520 | i found a bug in ubuntu 7.10 | 08:12 |
| Joe520 | with SMC 54mbps wireless card... | 08:12 |
| Joe520 | i cannot boot from live cd when smc is connected to the PCI bus... the boot will be frozen.... | 08:12 |
| Joe520 | is it fixed in hardy? | 08:13 |
| qense | hello | 08:31 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| Joe520 | hi | 11:12 |
| Joe520 | anybody here? | 11:12 |
| jeromeg | yes | 11:14 |
| persia | Joe520: Lots of people. What's up? | 11:14 |
| Joe520 | i had a bug i 710 | 11:18 |
| Joe520 | 7.10 | 11:18 |
| Joe520 | with SMC wireless pci card | 11:18 |
| Joe520 | i cannot boot from live cd | 11:18 |
| Joe520 | cos of the freeze | 11:19 |
| jeromeg | Joe520: you should report a bug on Launchpad | 11:19 |
| Joe520 | not here? | 11:19 |
| jeromeg | Joe520: here it will get lost | 11:20 |
| Joe520 | :S | 11:20 |
| Joe520 | ok where is the launchpad? | 11:20 |
| jeromeg | on Launchpad, a trace will be kept, and devs will be able to work on it | 11:20 |
| jeromeg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu | 11:21 |
| Joe520 | :S | 11:21 |
| Joe520 | ok | 11:21 |
| jeromeg | please have a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures to provide all the needed information | 11:22 |
| Joe520 | ok | 11:22 |
| Joe520 | thx | 11:22 |
| Joe520 | bye-bye | 11:30 |
| afflux | morning | 11:40 |
| kblin | hi folks | 11:44 |
| kblin | I'm currently trying to figure out bug #198871 | 11:49 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 198871 in ubuntu "Jmicron AHCI controller probs..." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198871 | 11:49 |
| kblin | I'm pretty sure it's actually a kernel bug with the jmicron driver | 11:49 |
| kblin | it's not filed correctly, though | 11:49 |
| afflux | bug 101845 is about gnome-mount trying to access a mountpoint which was not removed on reboot, so it appends an underscore each time. Any ideas on which package is affected? | 11:54 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 101845 in ubuntu "Automounted Volumes mount points change" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/101845 | 11:54 |
| bicyclist | afflux: So now my presumed bug is confirmed ;) Wondered recently why areca backup didn't run til i found the _ after the drive. | 12:59 |
| afflux | bicyclist: right, I have seen the same thing long ago but thought it was fixed since it somehow disappeared | 13:09 |
| bicyclist | Long ago meaning in a previous release or earlier in the hardy development ? | 13:10 |
| afflux | in edgy even | 13:10 |
| bicyclist | Ok, now THAT is long ago ;) ! | 13:11 |
| afflux | when I was a simple user ;) | 13:11 |
| bicyclist | Grin, yeah, same with me around that time ;) | 13:11 |
| afflux | I think I even fixed that issue with a workaround, but I can't remember what it was | 13:12 |
| bicyclist | Hmm, maybe something in the mtab ? | 13:13 |
| bicyclist | I think i remember some issues way back then ;) | 13:13 |
| afflux | hm | 13:14 |
| bicyclist | Look what i found: There are two lines regarding usb | 13:17 |
| bicyclist | procbususb /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0 | 13:17 |
| bicyclist | AND | 13:18 |
| bicyclist | none /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw,devmode=0666 0 0 | 13:18 |
| bicyclist | Which one is the correct one ? i remember having removed none /proc.... but now it is there again ! | 13:19 |
| zasf | #ubuntu-it | 15:43 |
| qense | ? | 15:43 |
| zasf | sorry, I didn't type '/j' | 15:44 |
| qense | :) | 15:44 |
| qense | does anyone knows if bug 212271 is complete? I've triaged it, but I can't find the cause in the log files | 16:38 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 212271 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 "2.6.24-15-generic: saa7134-alsa makes HAL to fail" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212271 | 16:38 |
| exxonn | hi | 16:58 |
| qense | hello | 16:58 |
| exxonn | i have a question ...im new to ubuntu .. | 16:58 |
| qense | ok | 16:58 |
| qense | this channel is for bugs :) | 16:58 |
| qense | for support you can try #ubuntu or #ubuntu-{language-code} | 16:58 |
| exxonn | how do i install azureus ? (a bittorrent client) ? already downloaded it but have no clue how to install it and now i cant even find it | 16:59 |
| qense | exonn: please ask in #ubuntu | 16:59 |
| exxonn | oh ok .. sorry | 16:59 |
| qense | :) | 16:59 |
| qense | never mind | 16:59 |
| qense | does anyone knows if bug 212271 is complete? I've triaged it, but I can't find the cause in the log files | 16:59 |
| exxonn | join #ubuntu | 16:59 |
| qense | Launchpad bug 212271 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 "2.6.24-15-generic: saa7134-alsa makes HAL to fail" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212271 | 16:59 |
| mrooney | exxonn: that bug looks related to something I just saw... | 17:40 |
| qense | exxonn is already gone :) | 17:42 |
| mrooney | oh, indeed! | 17:44 |
| === blue-frog_ is now known as blue-frog | ||
| qense | does syslog contain the same information as kern.log? | 18:05 |
| === dodger_ is now known as Hurtz | ||
| === _stink__ is now known as _stink_ | ||
| bdmurray | james_w: you might be interested in bug 210622 | 18:20 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 210622 in bzrtools "package bzrtools 1.2.0-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210622 | 18:20 |
| jarlath | I'm just looking through bugs in launchpad.net. Are bugs filed independently of the ubuntu release version? It seems that there are bugs filed for Feisty and Hardy. | 18:35 |
| LaserJock | yep | 18:38 |
| LaserJock | there's bugs for every release | 18:38 |
| jarlath | So if I just want to triage Hardy ones, is that possible? | 18:38 |
| LaserJock | hmm, that can be slightly problematic | 18:39 |
| LaserJock | you can look at bugs specifically targeted at hardy | 18:39 |
| jarlath | Okay, so the idea is that all releases are treated equally? | 18:39 |
| LaserJock | the idea is that we don't know what release a bug applies to | 18:40 |
| jarlath | Okay. By searching for Hardy ? | 18:40 |
| jarlath | Is that not inefficient? | 18:41 |
| jarlath | I'm not knocking the system - I'm just trying to understand so I can contribute. | 18:41 |
| LaserJock | well, people just file bugs | 18:41 |
| LaserJock | we don't know before hand what release the bug is in | 18:42 |
| jarlath | Oh yes. | 18:42 |
| jarlath | that makes sense. That's where triaging comes in? | 18:42 |
| LaserJock | exactly | 18:42 |
| jarlath | (lightbulb!) | 18:43 |
| jarlath | Thank you. | 18:43 |
| Nafallo | bugs can only be in more releases then one, mind you. | 18:43 |
| LaserJock | yep | 18:43 |
| LaserJock | so the first step is to verify that it is a bug | 18:43 |
| LaserJock | then you figure out what releases have the bug | 18:43 |
| jarlath | If the same package version is used in more than one release you mean? I don't fully understand you Nafallo. | 18:43 |
| LaserJock | bugs can be carried from release to release as well | 18:44 |
| jarlath | Ah yes. | 18:44 |
| Nafallo | jarlath: what says it has to be only one version of a program having the same bug? | 18:44 |
| jarlath | Nafallo: I understand now. Thanks. | 18:44 |
| Nafallo | np | 18:46 |
| snap-l | I'm not sure what t do with bug #46994 | 18:47 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 46994 in setserial "Setserial's autosave doesn't work" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/46994 | 18:47 |
| snap-l | Seems upstream isn't responding | 18:47 |
| snap-l | Should I mark the bug as invalid? | 18:47 |
| qense | you could send an email to de upstream maintainer to ask for more information about the progress | 18:48 |
| Nafallo | snap-l: is it a reproducibla, actual bug? | 18:48 |
| snap-l | I've reproduced it myself | 18:48 |
| Nafallo | somewhere my mind took a turn and inserted random characters :-P | 18:48 |
| snap-l | However, I'm not even sure this is the right way to set serial ports | 18:48 |
| Nafallo | snap-l: then it is in fact a bug... why would you mark it as not being one? | 18:49 |
| snap-l | I did, and received no response. | 18:49 |
| snap-l | My thought is there's another way to set the serial ports rather than setserial | 18:49 |
| Nafallo | if it is a bug. it is a bug... | 18:49 |
| snap-l | although I'm not aware of what that is, since I'm not using serial ports much anymore. | 18:49 |
| snap-l | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314219 <- This is the note I sent to them. | 18:50 |
| ubotu | Debian bug 314219 in setserial "setserial: package configure goes wrong" [Important,Open] | 18:50 |
| qense | I've been triaging bug 212271 but I can't find a line in the error logs that indicates what's going wrong. What files should I ask for? | 18:53 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 212271 in linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 "2.6.24-15-generic: saa7134-alsa makes HAL to fail" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212271 | 18:53 |
| snap-l | qense: Is there anything in /var/log/messages? | 18:55 |
| qense | I don't know :) | 18:55 |
| qense | I'll ask for it | 18:59 |
| qense | how do you mark bugs for expiration? | 19:10 |
| LaserJock | qense: they expire when they are set to Incomplete for 60 days without any further response | 19:11 |
| qense | when does the warning appear above the title? | 19:11 |
| LaserJock | when you set it to Incomplete | 19:12 |
| qense | I've set a lot of bug reports to incomplete but they never got a expiration warning above their name | 19:13 |
| Iulian | If you assign the bugs to you it won't expire. | 19:13 |
| qense | ok | 19:14 |
| qense | so you shouldn't assign bugs to yourself when you're triaging them? | 19:15 |
| LaserJock | well, assigning means your doing something about the bug | 19:15 |
| qense | what's actually the policy withing bugcontrol about assigning yourself to bugs | 19:15 |
| LaserJock | like working on it | 19:15 |
| LaserJock | I'm thinking for most triage you're not going to want to assign yourself | 19:16 |
| qense | the triage guide tells you to assign yourself to a bug report you're triaging until it's confirmed | 19:16 |
| LaserJock | huh, interesting | 19:16 |
| LaserJock | I guess that would be so that you don't lose track of what you're doing and you stick to a bug until it's resolved | 19:17 |
| qense | it's indeed quite useful | 19:17 |
| === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon | ||
| qense | but I think we should make a policy for this, a clear set of rules to let bug expire but also be able to keep easily track of them | 19:17 |
| qense | ping bdmurray | 19:17 |
| Iulian | I'm not sure if this is very important when you triage a bug. If you assign it to yourself it means that you are keeping an eye to the bug to be completed and ready for a developer to start working on it. | 19:18 |
| Iulian | After that (means that the bug is ready and has all the information needed for a dev to look at it) you should unassign from it and change its status to Confirmed/Triaged. | 19:22 |
| qense | but if a bug isn't confirmed nor contains enough information... | 19:23 |
| Iulian | You should ask here in the channel and someone will try to help you to triage it, of course if (s)he knows. | 19:24 |
| qense | what if the reported doesn't respond | 19:24 |
| * Gnine thanks all folks who make ubuntu possible | 19:25 | |
| * Gnine also hugglez ubotu | 19:25 | |
| Iulian | After four weeks, its status should be changed to Invalid with the right comment from /Bugs/Responses | 19:26 |
| qense | the expiration functionality does that automatically | 19:26 |
| Iulian | No, it does not, AFAIK. | 19:27 |
| qense | it should | 19:27 |
| qense | so if we get a better way of assigning people to bugs we can use it | 19:27 |
| LaserJock | Iulian: why 4 weeks when it would normaly expire in 8? | 19:27 |
| Iulian | LaserJock: Don't know, ask bdmurray. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status | 19:28 |
| LaserJock | I'm not terribly fond of these "cookie cutter" pages | 19:30 |
| LaserJock | some bugs will be open for a long time | 19:32 |
| LaserJock | years perhaps | 19:32 |
| LaserJock | I'm not fond of just ignoring things after 30 days | 19:32 |
| qense | but if no one replies, what should you do? | 19:34 |
| Iulian | LaserJock: But not in the Incomplete status and without any responses from the reporter. | 19:35 |
| Iulian | LaserJock: Oh yea, it depends. | 19:35 |
| LaserJock | Iulian: sure it can | 19:36 |
| syke_ | qense: hi :) | 19:36 |
| LaserJock | look at Debian | 19:36 |
| qense | hello | 19:36 |
| LaserJock | I say about 20 bugs today that have been opened for > 2 years without a response | 19:36 |
| LaserJock | *saw | 19:36 |
| LaserJock | it doesn't mean they aren't bugs | 19:36 |
| syke_ | this bug gets inquiries a few times a day, for months now: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogasawara/hardy-buglist.html | 19:37 |
| syke_ | er | 19:37 |
| syke_ | this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/197558 | 19:37 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 197558 in linux "ssb module breaks BCM4328 with ndiswrapper (regression from 2.6.24-10)" [Medium,Triaged] | 19:37 |
| qense | well, it's confirmed and assigned, there isn't much we can do on that for now | 19:38 |
| syke_ | working with my canonical support rep, I finally got my wireless working decently in feisty/gutsy, but now it's broken again. i even bought a new laptop to try and help the situation :( | 19:38 |
| Iulian | LaserJock: Yes, but that's why we can change its status to NEW again if someone knows something about that bug. | 19:38 |
| qense | maybe it shoudl be reported upstream | 19:38 |
| LaserJock | Iulian: but it looks like people are just closing bugs as fast as they can ;-) | 19:38 |
| Iulian | LaserJock: Unfortunately I noticed that too. | 19:39 |
| qense | but bugs like bug 182410 aren't things that need to stay open in my eyes | 19:39 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 182410 in hal "ATI DRIVER CORUPTED" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182410 | 19:39 |
| LaserJock | qense: but people need to know the difference | 19:40 |
| qense | true | 19:40 |
| syke_ | qense: can I ask my support rep to do something to help? | 19:41 |
| qense | support rep? | 19:41 |
| qense | what does it support? | 19:41 |
| syke_ | my canonical support rep, that is :) | 19:41 |
| qense | ah, the partner | 19:41 |
| secretlondon | syke_ no idea | 19:41 |
| syke_ | I try to work in the community for alpha/beta to clear up issues before release, and then with Canonical post-release | 19:42 |
| syke_ | but maybe poking at some french-canadians before release might help get this ndiswrapper issue fixed? | 19:42 |
| LaserJock | syke_: it's got a Medium importance and is assigned to the Kernel team | 19:42 |
| syke_ | ok | 19:42 |
| LaserJock | I'm not sure how much more can be done other than telling your support rep you want it fixed ;-) | 19:43 |
| syke_ | I would be concerned since several people ask in the channel per day, for months now, that they are getting a bad impression of hardy. Hopefully it gets fixed for beta 2 | 19:43 |
| qense | can it be forwared upstream? | 19:43 |
| LaserJock | upstrem to where? | 19:43 |
| qense | kernel.org? | 19:44 |
| qense | or is it an ubuntu module? | 19:44 |
| LaserJock | I wouldn't think sending it upstream would do much, and I would let the Kernel Team figure that out | 19:45 |
| syke_ | just so they know it's a widespread problem that has potential PR impact ;) | 19:47 |
| === syke_ is now known as syke | ||
| syke | qense: thanks for your help and candor :) | 19:48 |
| DOOM_NX | hello! :) | 20:37 |
| jarlath | Hi DOOM_NX | 20:38 |
| jarlath | Are the logs of this channel available online? | 20:38 |
| pochu | !logs | 20:38 |
| ubotu | Channel logs can be found at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ - Logs for LoCo channels are at http://logs.ubuntu-eu.org/freenode/ | 20:38 |
| jarlath | It would be a good way to learn. | 20:38 |
| jarlath | :) Thx | 20:39 |
| james_w | bdmurray: yeah, it's on my radar, thanks. | 21:15 |
| greg-g | wow, I'll need to make a journal entry about this. First time I saw a bug with [Intrepid] in the subject. bug 212478 | 21:29 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 212478 in xulrunner-1.9 "[Intrepid] Use the system sqlite instead of the in-source one" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212478 | 21:29 |
| secretlondon | wow | 21:29 |
| greg-g | yeah, it is a special day | 21:30 |
| Raseel | Hi, I'm trying yo get involved with Ubuntu Bug packaging with the MOTU team. I need help with the following things : | 21:34 |
| afflux | (what is bug packaging?) | 21:35 |
| Raseel | @afflux Uhh... Creating Ubuntu packages for new packages requests. | 21:35 |
| afflux | righ | 21:36 |
| afflux | then you'll better ask at #ubuntu-motu | 21:36 |
| greg-g | so, just packaging in general then yes? or patches to fix specific bugs? | 21:36 |
| Raseel | oh ok... sorry..... | 21:36 |
| Raseel | My bad. | 21:36 |
| greg-g | no worries | 21:36 |
| Raseel | @greg-g : This would be a good place to ask about Bug Triaging then ? | 21:37 |
| greg-g | Raseel: yes | 21:38 |
| Raseel | Good, I'll be back here soon then :-) | 21:39 |
| greg-g | Raseel: sounds good :) | 21:39 |
| crimsun | people are jumping the gun a bit with those xulrunner-1.9/ff-3.0 bug reports | 21:48 |
| LaserJock | bit interesting | 21:48 |
| crimsun | if they had waited until b5 was available to update, they wouldn't have been bitten | 21:48 |
| LaserJock | but who wants to wait for the latest crack? :-) | 21:54 |
| jjesse | ji like crack | 21:55 |
| jjesse | :) | 21:55 |
| afflux | argh | 22:13 |
| afflux | nice upstream people closing their bug with "this was fixed in <some-version>", but no indication on what was the fix. | 22:13 |
| secretlondon | argh | 22:14 |
| afflux | they don't run a changelog, they don't have dates in their release announcements, they even do their releases without indications in the VCS. I just don't know between which revisions i've to search. | 22:15 |
| LaserJock | that's kinda gross | 22:15 |
| afflux | on top of that, they're asking for getting their shiny new release to hardy, *today*, five days from finalfreeze | 22:16 |
| afflux | *mumbles* | 22:16 |
| LaserJock | what is the upstream? | 22:17 |
| afflux | It's the screenlets package, I'm not sure if it's a single person or what. | 22:18 |
| LaserJock | jjesse: you're not in -doc? | 22:31 |
| afflux | hm, going to bed now. good night! | 22:31 |
| === jacobmp92 is now known as jacob | ||
| === dodger__ is now known as Hurtz | ||
| === secretlondo is now known as secretlondon | ||
| Gnine | bug 205654 | 23:57 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 205654 in firefox-3.0 "firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy()" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205654 | 23:57 |
| Gnine | shame .. thats what i just got | 23:57 |
| crimsun | with 3.0b5? | 23:58 |
| Gnine | 4 | 23:58 |
| Gnine | i see.. | 23:59 |
| secretlondon | b5 is the new one | 23:59 |
| Gnine | just that update-manager nor apt has cue me for upgrade yet | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!