/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/04/05/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacfta: i think everything is now up. i had to improve the firefox changelog. that was far too much cryptic content. we should try to clean it up that way before uploading everytime i gues15:40
* asac back to fighting spam flood15:41
ftaasac, lp rendered the changelog strangely16:04
ftanss 3.12 rc1 is in progress upstream16:05
ftasunbird 0.8 is out16:05
ftaxul ftbfsed on hppa16:06
ftag++-4.2 -o nsGREGlue.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=Linux -I./../build  -I. -I. -I../../dist/include/string -I../../dist/include   -I../../dist/include/xpcom -I/usr/include/nspr   -I/usr/include  -I../../dist/sdk/include    -fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -pedantic -g -fno-strict-aliasi16:06
ftang -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Os -freorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -finline-limit=50   -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsGREGlue.pp nsGREGlue.cpp16:06
ftansGREGlue.cpp: In function 'nsresult GRE_GetGREPathWithProperties(const GREVersionRange*, PRUint32, const GREProperty*, PRUint32, char*, PRUint32)':16:06
ftansGREGlue.cpp:174: error: invalid conversion from 'const GREProperty*' to 'GREProperty*'16:06
ftamake[5]: *** [nsGREGlue.o] Error 116:06
ftamake[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.9-1.9~b5+nobinonly/mozilla/xpcom/glue'16:06
ftamake[4]: *** [libs] Error 216:06
asacfta: what do you mean?16:07
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/13134463/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz16:07
asaci have no idea why you are not linked directly16:07
asacmaybe it only looks for ubuntu.com addresses16:07
asacor your address is not in launchpad as primary address?16:07
ftaand you have 5 icons16:07
asac5?16:08
asachehe i see 7 heads :)16:08
asacfta: David Futcher < bobbocanfly@gmail.com> is properly displayed16:09
asacyou probably really use a bad mail?16:09
asacfta: you don't even have an email setup in launchapd?16:10
asacyeah ... no public address provided16:10
asacyour fault16:10
asac:-P16:10
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~fta16:10
asacwe should really try to polish the firefox changelog before release. It read by lots of people before upgrading16:11
ftamy email is correct, but not public, but I expect lp to have access to it, just not spam spiders16:13
asacwell16:13
asacits important to also show your email to other ubuntu folks16:13
asacbut its definitly the reason why your email is not properly parsed16:14
asac(given that your email is already everywhere i'd suggest you let it go :))16:14
asacbtw, if you are not logged in all emails are hidden in launchpad16:14
asactry it16:14
asacat least they definitly are hidden in bzr code browse16:15
ftadone16:23
asacgreat!16:23
asacyeah16:23
asacyou even have a head more than me ;)16:24
asacmost likely it depends how frequently you are named in log16:24
ftalooks like a bug to me16:24
asacyeah i think so too ... but its funny ;)16:25
asacanyway ... i think this is a great release :)16:25
asacnow we have translations left as only really big issue :/16:26
ftatoo bad we still have the flash crashes16:28
ftawhat do you see when you open this pdf ? http://eloise.cocolog-nifty.com/rodoku/fileschikamatsu/SonezakiShinju_michiyuki.pdf16:28
asacblack garbage16:30
asaccairo regression?16:30
ftai don't know16:33
ftasame with xpdf16:33
asacwhy do you think itts a good document=16:33
ftabecause it comes from a site i often visit16:34
ftabut i don't know about that particular pdf16:34
ftapkgstriptranslations: xulrunner-1.9-dbgsym does not contain translations, skipping17:33
ftacp: target `/tmp/pkgstriptranslations.ew7658/source/' is not a directory: No such file or directory17:33
ftamake: *** [binary-strip-IMPL/xulrunner-1.9] Error 117:33
ftaasac, ^^17:33
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/13135043/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-sparc.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz17:33
asacfta: hmm18:02
asacappears to be only on sparc18:02
asacpkgstriptranslations: preparing translation tarball xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386_translations.tar.gz...done (1 files)18:03
asacpkgmaintainermangler: Not overriding Maintainer for domain lists.ubuntu.com18:03
asac \o/ yay it works ;)18:03
asacrock on18:04
shirishhi guys, does anybody of an addon which tells about how much time it took for a webpage to render as well as gives a split chart or something of each component18:04
shirish know I had seen something like that way way back, but don't remember18:04
asachmm18:04
asacuse tools-> addons and search there ?18:04
asac :)18:04
asaclets see when the translation template hits translatinos.launchpad.net18:06
shirishasac: dunno what keyword to use for that18:06
ftab5 built on i386 :)18:07
shirishyeah, that's good news fta ;)18:07
shirishany idea if xulrunner building great with galeon as well?18:08
shirishfabien ^18:10
ftai don't know, i haven't touched galeon in years18:11
ftait was my main browser for many years18:11
shirishI use galeon as well ff318:12
ftaamd64 done too18:14
asacshirish: most likely not18:15
asacupstream has to fix it18:15
asac(e.g. suport xul-1.918:15
asac)18:16
shirishasac: right18:16
asacif upstream is active at all ;)18:16
shirishthat is false18:16
asacwhat is false?18:16
shirishthey have introduced galeon 2.0.518:16
asacgreat18:16
asachot that many changes i guess ;)18:16
shirishfew days back18:16
shirishI have put up a bug report in debian for the same18:16
asacin previous release they claimed to "support 1.9", but apparently had no clue what that means ;)18:17
shirishwas thinking let it come into experimental/unstable then would give a sync request18:17
shirishright18:17
asacshirish: debian has no xul 1.918:17
shirishwow, didn't know that18:17
asacthey are lame18:17
asacand when they release it will most likely be completely broken18:18
shirishalso haven't they forked ff or something to that effect18:18
asacthats just a rebranding18:18
asacnot a complete fork18:18
asacwe have iceweasel, icedove, iceape in debian18:19
xhakershirish: firebug + yslow is what you need for webpage time benchmarking18:19
asacfirebug is either in the archive or waiting for a push18:19
asacits definitly in our firefox-extensions project on LP ... ready.18:19
shirishfirebug+yslow ok18:19
shirishasac: I think its waiting for a push, I checked the irc logs yesterday and then looked for them today morning18:19
shirishits 12 hours now, lemme recheck the same18:20
shirishnope, not till now :(18:20
shirishasac: its named firebug or something else18:22
asacbug 19437518:29
ubotuLaunchpad bug 194375 in firefox-extensions "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firebug extension" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19437518:29
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firebug/1.1.0~b11+svn317-0ubuntu218:29
asacok sits in binary NEW18:29
shirishasac: so its going to take a day or something?18:31
asacnext time an archive admin comes around, it will go in18:31
asaclet me ask hobbsee18:31
asacasked18:32
asaclets see if she is awake18:32
shirishshe has been idle for sometime.18:34
shirishanyway bbiaf18:34
asacshirish: she lives in australia :)18:35
asac@time australia18:35
asac@time sydney18:35
ubotuCurrent time in Australia/Sydney: April 06 2008, 03:35:17 - Next meeting: Server Team in 4 days18:35
shirishok, that explains it :)18:35
asacfta: what do you think about the changelog format?18:42
asaci consider to not use * XXXX <asac...> ... but * Signed-Off: XXXX18:43
asacof * Credits: ....18:43
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu118:44
asacaeh ... https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu118:44
asacthats it18:44
asacok ... as hard as this might sound. i am working on fixing icedove today18:56
asacotherwise debian folks will shoot me if they come to hamburg i guess18:56
fta:)18:57
asachttp://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=src&data=icedove&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious18:58
asacthose are the grave bugs ;)18:58
asac#461981: icedove: the new package on powerpc does not work  => 74 days old18:59
asacdear18:59
asacdebian bug 46306218:59
ubotuDebian bug 463062 in icedove "icedove corrrupts mail cache repeatedly" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/46306218:59
asaci doubt that thats a valid bug ;)18:59
asacat least not due to my packaging18:59
asacdebian bug 46835318:59
ubotuDebian bug 468353 in icedove "crash: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: double free or corruption (out): 0xb65acd40 ***" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/46835318:59
asacfta: do you want to upload to debian directly? i think there is a control field that i could add to allow you to upload icedove directly ;)19:00
asachehe19:00
asacdebian bug 47016819:00
ubotuDebian bug 470168 in icedove "iceweasel & icedove crashed, corrupted filesystem, ~/.mozilla-thunderbird became a pipe" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/47016819:00
asachell whats that19:01
asac.mozilla-thunderbird _became a pipe_19:01
asacread that twice19:01
asacdebian bug 47054219:01
ftaI need your help for prism19:01
ubotuDebian bug 470542 in icedove "icedove 2.0.0.9-3: 100%cpu consumption and unusable" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/47054219:01
asacthats not a grave bug for sure19:01
asacfta: what can i do?19:01
asacdebian bug 47012819:01
ubotuDebian bug 470128 in icedove "xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/47012819:01
asacok thats what i know how to fix ;)19:01
ftahelp me find what's wrong :)19:02
asacfta: does dom-inspector work now?19:02
asaci haven't tested ... just bumped the maxVersion ;)19:02
asacubufox was a really great release .... it closed more than a half of the open bugs in changelog \o/19:03
asacif that could ever happen to firefox i would burst out in tears19:03
asacfta: whats wrong?19:04
asac:)19:04
asaccompletely broken?19:04
asacfta: in configure.in ... if i want external env variable to overload the default, do i need to do anything?19:05
asaclike test -n "$OS_ARCH" && OS_ARCH=Default ?19:05
asacor is that done automagically?19:05
ftano it's not. if it assigns a default value,  it will erase yours19:06
asacok ... so i have to check that manually19:06
asacthats what i thought, but i remember that in gnash it worked automagically for some19:06
asacfta: tell me whats up with your prism thing19:06
ftagrab https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/prism/prism19:08
ftamerge with the source19:09
ftarun autoconf2.13 + ./configure --with-libxul-sdk=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b519:09
ftamake19:09
ftaand try dist/bin/prism19:09
ftaand try dist/bin/prism -jsconsole19:09
fta(debian/rules is not updated yet)19:10
asacwhere is the source?19:11
asacfta: can you bring that up into bzr as .upstream branch?19:11
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/prism_0.9+svn20080403r11903.orig.tar.gz19:11
asacyou can ask for sync in launchpad for svn19:11
asacfta: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/prism/trunk19:12
ftawell, i want to post the build system patch in bugzilla19:12
asaccan you ask for a sync?19:12
asacyeah19:12
asaci can try now19:12
asacbut i'd love to have everything we deal with that can be synched in lp19:12
asacok merged19:13
ftabuild it19:13
ftait will create deb but ignore them19:13
asacfta: there is no configure.in19:13
asacno idea whats going on19:14
ftabuild it, it's needed to apply the patches and do a subst o, the .ini19:14
asaci am in prism/ directory19:14
asacok19:14
asacoh ... no cdbs?19:14
ftanot yet19:15
ftai will trash most of debian/rules once this build system is ok19:15
asacfta: why do you want to use the mozilla build system?19:16
asacwhy not plain configure.ac + automake?19:16
ftabecause that's what upstream wants19:16
ftathere are two xpi now, and soon some binaries19:17
ftaalready on mac and win19:17
asacis upstream aware the mozilla build-system is one of the most rotten things on earth;) .... mozilla only keeps it because they fear regressions ;)19:17
asacand they switch to python for mozilla 219:18
asacanyway19:18
asacit built and starts19:18
asacwhats the issue?19:18
ftayou can't get anything to work except the initial dialog19:18
asacok19:18
ftatry -webapp path/to/a/webapp19:19
asacError: Cc['@mozilla.org/desktop-environment;1'] is undefined19:19
asacSource File: chrome://webrunner/content/webrunner.js19:19
asacLine: 51119:19
asacyou really have to tell me more ... is that a recent regression?19:19
asacor is that only reproducible with your build system?19:20
fta0.8 was ok. 0.9 changed a lot19:20
ftawell, the debs don't work either19:21
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/prism.png19:21
asacfta: there is no DesktopEnvionrment for unix19:23
asacno doubt thats one of the issues (as we see an uncatched exception resolving @mozilla.org/desktop-enviornment19:24
ftathe docshell seems to prevent the main window to appear19:24
asaceither fix prism to survive a non existing component or code that for unix/linux19:24
ftahm19:24
asacfta: wanna give me a patch to you?19:26
asacfta: look at the apprunner.js line 51119:27
asacif that throws an exception then delayedStartup is not called at all (see a few lines below in setTimeout)19:28
asacyou should deal with that situation by just catching the exception and somehow taking care that the missing features get disabled for the time after that19:28
asacbut i think catching that exception should at least help you to get further now19:28
asaccopy?19:29
asacbut coding the desktop envioronment for unix shouldn't bet that hard either ;)19:31
asaca bit low level stuff, but in general doable i guess19:31
ftahmmn i thought it was supposed to work and then it was just a packaging issue19:34
ftabug 21241619:35
ubotuLaunchpad bug 212416 in firefox-3.0 "latest xulrunner-1.9 update breaks firefox-3.0" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21241619:35
asacdamn19:38
asaci have to talk to mvo19:38
asache said that versioned Breaks: does the right thing19:38
ftanot if people force it19:39
asachow?19:39
asacdist-upgrade?19:39
ftayes19:39
asacwell ... its the most graceful thing we can do right now19:39
asactightening up depends with upper bounds on firefox side is just too bad to pursue19:39
ftathat happens only when the upgrade in the middle (xul avail, but not ff3 yet)19:40
asacyeah sure19:40
ftathey19:40
ftaseems ff3 is not avail on i386 yet19:41
ftafirefox-3.0 | 3.0~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages19:41
ftafirefox-3.0 | 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources19:41
asacbug 21241619:44
ubotuLaunchpad bug 212416 in firefox-3.0 "latest xulrunner-1.9 update breaks firefox-3.0" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21241619:44
asacback to incomplete19:44
ftahow does the kernel handle this ? they have to update nvidia at the same time too19:46
asacfta: they have a meta package19:49
asacthat they bump once everything is available19:49
Jazzvaasac, ping...19:57
asacpongy19:59
asacJazzva: ^^19:59
JazzvaHey, hey...19:59
JazzvaDid you have time to look at the packaging?19:59
asacno ;) ... isn't it ok?20:00
asac:-P20:00
asacJazzva: ah20:00
asacyou were gone yesterday20:01
asacthe http header problem is that they use contents.rdf instead of chrome.manifest ... which isn't support natively on 1.9 branch anymore20:01
Jazzvadamn it... any fix for that?20:01
asacJazzva: just write a chrome.manifest20:01
asacthat should be simple20:01
JazzvaOk, just to check the structure of both files first :)?20:01
Jazzva?=...20:02
asacits shipped in top level directlry of .xpi20:02
JazzvaShould I write it manually, put it in debian and then move it in debian/rules20:02
Jazzva?20:02
asacJazzva: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Chrome_Registration20:02
JazzvaThanks...20:02
asacthere are examples for content, locale and skin20:02
asacthat should be enough20:02
JazzvaOk...20:03
asacif you have concrete problems let me know20:03
JazzvaI will...20:03
asacJazzva: look in the other extensions . there should be plenty of examples20:07
JazzvaDoing that... :)20:07
Jazzvaasac: Could you also try the mozilla-stumbleupon? They are using chrome.manifest, but it's not showing up... It might be something wrong with my FF...20:10
asacJazzva: you can remove the files in your profile that match extensions.*20:22
asacthen start ffox20:22
asacthat should clean up anything that might be broken in your profile20:22
asace.g. reregistering extensions and all that20:23
Jazzvaok... I'll try that ...20:23
asacfta: did you try to wrap prism thing with a try { } catch?20:30
asaclooks like they make extensive use of desktop-environment now20:31
asacso maybe its worth to implement20:31
ftaif you feel like doing it, please, feel free20:41
asacyeah ;) ... definitly not before release20:42
fta?20:44
asacfta: did you ever get a stacktrace with xul symbols out of your flash thing?21:19
asaci am looking at bug 20790721:19
ubotuBug 207907 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/207907 is private21:19
asacthat code looks definitly wrong21:19
asac[reed]: i think there is something wrong with the patch for mozilla bug 386844 that you landed21:20
ubotuMozilla bug 386844 in Plug-ins "Crash when running Java Applets [@ XSync - JavaPluginInstance5::SetWindow]" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38684421:20
ftano, i didn't.21:20
asac[reed]: look at stacktrace in bug 207907 ... and the comment i will drop in a minute21:22
ubotuLaunchpad bug 207907 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Beta 4 crashed while displaying a flash-popup" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20790721:22
Jazzvaasac, LiveHTTPHeaders is working :)... I'll push the branch in few minutes...21:45
Jazzvajust to move chrome.manifest to debian21:46
asacJazzva: to debian?21:49
asacyou can just commit that in .ubuntu branch21:49
asacthats the idea of the .upstream + ubuntu branch split21:49
JazzvaI will...21:49
asacno need to maintain patches/ or fix files during build21:50
asacjust commit as usual21:50
JazzvaOh... So, I can leave it in top level?21:50
asacbut remember to properly document that in changelog and commit message21:50
Jazzvaasac ^^21:50
asacJazzva: yes. just commit it21:55
asacif top level is upstream top level21:55
Jazzvak21:55
asacand forward that upstream so hopefully it will be included at some point21:55
ftaUsing saved location: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.head/22:14
ftabzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged. Use the merge command to reconcile them.22:14
ftaasac, ?22:14
VolansHi asac, we are ready with the package (if is not too late), you can find it here: http://debomatic.linuxdc.it/hardy/result/ubuntu-it-menu_1.0.6-0ubuntu1/22:15
Volanssorry for the delay due to a little problem encountered22:15
asacfta: well ... i pushed without overwrite22:17
asacand didn't merge in advance ...22:17
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6505/22:17
asacso you probably committed something locally that you didn't push yet22:18
asacfta: remember that  bzr merge will eliminate my revisions22:18
asacpull first and merge your branch on top22:18
ftaI can't pull22:18
ftadiverged22:19
asacpull new ... merge your branch over22:19
warp10Hi all!22:21
asacwarp10: hi22:22
warp10hey asac22:22
ftaasac, I don't get why bzr wants to revert 12+ commits when just the last one diverged22:24
asacfta: no idea ... it won't revert anything if you branch a few checkout and merge your local branch to that22:25
asaci will try to look closer what merge does when i get diverged again at some point22:25
asacwarp10: new channel member or just a question?22:26
asac;)22:26
warp10asac: no questions now... but maybe I will get closer to mozilla packages for Intrepid :)22:27
asacgreat. welcome then ;)22:28
warp10thank you! :)22:28
Volansasac: I hope it is not too late for including it in Hardy, anyway22:36
asacVolans: did you file a bug against firefox-extensions project ... please do so: ask for REVIEW/SPONSORSHIP22:37
asacand attach the required files to the bug report22:37
asacand add your extension the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions wiki page22:37
asacwith yourself as QA Contact22:37
Volansasac for the bug the required files are: orig.tar.gz, diff.gz e dsc ?22:43
asacyes22:44
cosmodadheya. I was curious about when TB 3 will be part of Ubuntu. I guess it won't make it into Hardy anymore, or will it?22:45
ftait wont22:45
cosmodadis 8.10 a good prediction for TB 3?22:46
cosmodadlet me rephrase: how much longer is the 2.x branch going to be developed?22:46
ftanot sure. they didn't announce a roadmap, afair22:47
ftai have it packaged for hardy if that's the question but it's pre alpha 122:47
ftaso there's still a long way to go22:48
Jazzvaasac: stumbleupon is fixed too... The problem was that I used lowercase id to declare MOZ_XPI_EMID, but it wasn't all lowercase in install.rdf, so there was a problem :)22:48
cosmodadI'm asking because there is a patch for a movemail bug but it's only working "against 1.8 branch, [...] and as such it works when building TB 3 or SM 2 from trunk".22:48
cosmodadsorry *not* against 1.822:49
cosmodadbut trunk22:49
cosmodadhow's the 1.8 branch related to 2.x?22:49
fta1.8 is the gecko part, the core, used by tb222:49
ftatb3 uses 1.922:49
cosmodadI wonder why patches are released for trunk when there isn't even a roadmap leading to TB 3.22:51
cosmodadassuming that TB 2 will be in action for quite a while.22:51
asacJazzva: goof22:53
asacgod22:53
asac;)22:53
Jazzvalol22:53
JazzvaYay... made it by saturday midnight :)22:53
asacthats cool22:53
Volansasac: wiki updated, bug updated ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/+bug/112846 ) I hope in the right way22:53
ubotuLaunchpad bug 112846 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Ubuntu-it Menu (Firefox extension)" [Wishlist,Triaged]22:53
ftacosmodad, maybe ask on moznet, this has nothing to do with ubuntu. we package what they produce.22:53
Jazzvathanks for your help :)... I think I'd never guess the contents.rdg => chrome.manifest part22:53
asacVolans: looking22:54
cosmodadfta: you are right. I guess I will just comment the bug report.22:54
asaccosmodad: trunk is current development focs22:54
asacfocus22:54
asacnothing new is introduced on 1.8 branch22:54
cosmodadasac: not even bug fixes?22:54
asactbird was more or less in sync wth ffox 1.8, but for trunk it isn't22:55
asaccosmodad: bug fixes only for regressions and high impact bugs22:55
asacgiven that movemail was never really officially supported i doubt that it qualifies for that22:55
cosmodaddarn. :/22:55
asachowever, i think it could go in, but its hard to find someone investing time in 1.8 branch22:55
cosmodadwish I knew enough about the TB code to do modify the patch on my own.22:56
asaccosmodad: learning by doing ;)22:56
cosmodadit's only a bunch of lines, and the patch applies, but it's not working.22:56
asacwell tbird 3 is most likely still shaky22:56
ftaasac, are we releasing extensions with b4 hardcoded ?22:56
asacfta: do we?22:56
asacthats a bug. i tried to take care that thats not happening22:56
ftaasblock+22:57
ftaadblock+22:57
asacbut maybe i missed it her and there22:57
asacyeah ... thats not me22:57
asacrainct is motu ...22:57
asacwe should fix that though22:57
cosmodadasac: could the patch be introduced to TB 2 by some Ubuntu group, e.g. your team, MOTU, whatever?22:57
asacfta: let me fix it22:57
asaccosmodad: i think we have no time right now. i guess there is already a bug open22:58
asaciirc it already has a patch22:58
asacmaybe take a look22:58
cosmodadasac: the bug is filed, but there was no patch 24h ago.22:58
cosmodadasac: there's only one patch in mozilla bugzilla, but like I said, it only applies against trunk.22:59
asaccosmodad: i mean bug in launchpad22:59
ftaasac, i'm using a devel version but users are complaining in the forum and are now jumping on the tester extension :P22:59
cosmodadasac: yeah the bug is filed in LP, but no fix available.23:00
asacfta: please deescalate in the forum, comment and say that an upgrade will be available in a few23:00
asacthanks23:00
ftadone23:04
asacfta: its bug 203015 ...  he didn't commit to bzr back then23:09
ubotuLaunchpad bug 203015 in adblock-plus "not compatible with firefox 3.0b4" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20301523:09
asaci will just upload again23:09
asacubuntu323:09
asacand push that to branch23:09
asacok fix uploaded23:09
ftathx for them ;)23:10
asaccan we monitor all branches and kick people when a higher version appears in archive then in bzr?23:11
ftaeasy :)23:19
asacuploading icedove beast23:22
asaceat this ;)23:22
asacjimmy_: that gconf patch is really dirty23:31
asacjimmy_: you didn't upgrade the UPSTREAM branch?23:31
asacjimmy_: thats really much work for me now23:31
Volansby the way asac, have you had the time to look if all was fine?23:34
asacjimmy_: please provide me a clean one first thing on monday. otherwise we cannot support gconf in midbrowser hardy23:35
Jazzvaasac: anything left for those extensions, or is it up to the archive team now?23:35
Jazzva*left for me to do23:36
asacJazzva: i think 4 are not uploaded yet23:36
asacJazzva: what about those that are not yet upgraded?23:36
asacJazzva: we need to move them to firefox-223:36
asacif we cannot fix them23:36
Jazzvaasac: ok... I'll provide a fix for those that are not compatible for sure...23:36
Jazzvabug report + diff?23:37
asacyes.23:37
asacthat should be ok23:37
Jazzvaand firefox extensions + mozillateam?23:37
asacmaybe note the bug in the table of extensions page23:37
asacJazzva: yes, upstream firefox extensions would be helpful23:37
asaci don't read bugmail right now ... so mozillateam is not helpful23:37
asac:)23:37
Jazzvaoh, it's good to know :)23:38
asacwell. i think i should filter mozillateam mail somewhere else23:38
asacit should be far less23:38
asacmost goes to mozilla-bugs (hopefully)23:38
asacthis upload to dewbian is really creeping along23:44
asacJazzva: can you send a message on such a bug again?23:47
Jazzvaasac: huh?23:48
Jazzva:)23:48
asacyay ... deleted 10000 unread mails in ubuntu-bugs ;)23:48
asacnow directing to /dev/null ;)23:49
Jazzvasoooo ... i need to resend bugmails? :)23:49
asacJazzva: the idea was to see if it ends up in my high prio folder now23:49
asacif you send a message on firefox-extensions23:49
Jazzvaok, i'll write something in a few minutes...23:49
asaclet me know ;)23:50
Jazzvaasac, done... edited the description for bug 20517223:56
ubotuLaunchpad bug 205172 in greasemonkey "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firefox-greasemonkey" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20517223:56
ftaasac, why did you post a midbrowser patch to bug 23369 ?23:57
ubotuLaunchpad bug 23369 in firefox "firefox(-gnome-support) should get proxy from gconf" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2336923:58
asacfta: well. thats the gconf backend patch against xul 1.923:59
JazzvaHmm, I thought that description editing will send a notice to subscribers23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!