[15:40] <asac> fta: i think everything is now up. i had to improve the firefox changelog. that was far too much cryptic content. we should try to clean it up that way before uploading everytime i gues
[15:41]  * asac back to fighting spam flood
[16:04] <fta> asac, lp rendered the changelog strangely
[16:05] <fta> nss 3.12 rc1 is in progress upstream
[16:05] <fta> sunbird 0.8 is out
[16:06] <fta> xul ftbfsed on hppa
[16:06] <fta> g++-4.2 -o nsGREGlue.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=Linux -I./../build  -I. -I. -I../../dist/include/string -I../../dist/include   -I../../dist/include/xpcom -I/usr/include/nspr   -I/usr/include  -I../../dist/sdk/include    -fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -pedantic -g -fno-strict-aliasi
[16:06] <fta> ng -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -Os -freorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -finline-limit=50   -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsGREGlue.pp nsGREGlue.cpp
[16:06] <fta> nsGREGlue.cpp: In function 'nsresult GRE_GetGREPathWithProperties(const GREVersionRange*, PRUint32, const GREProperty*, PRUint32, char*, PRUint32)':
[16:06] <fta> nsGREGlue.cpp:174: error: invalid conversion from 'const GREProperty*' to 'GREProperty*'
[16:06] <fta> make[5]: *** [nsGREGlue.o] Error 1
[16:06] <fta> make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.9-1.9~b5+nobinonly/mozilla/xpcom/glue'
[16:06] <fta> make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
[16:07] <asac> fta: what do you mean?
[16:07] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13134463/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[16:07] <asac> i have no idea why you are not linked directly
[16:07] <asac> maybe it only looks for ubuntu.com addresses
[16:07] <asac> or your address is not in launchpad as primary address?
[16:07] <fta> and you have 5 icons
[16:08] <asac> 5?
[16:08] <asac> hehe i see 7 heads :)
[16:09] <asac> fta: David Futcher < bobbocanfly@gmail.com> is properly displayed
[16:09] <asac> you probably really use a bad mail?
[16:10] <asac> fta: you don't even have an email setup in launchapd?
[16:10] <asac> yeah ... no public address provided
[16:10] <asac> your fault
[16:10] <asac> :-P
[16:10] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta
[16:11] <asac> we should really try to polish the firefox changelog before release. It read by lots of people before upgrading
[16:13] <fta> my email is correct, but not public, but I expect lp to have access to it, just not spam spiders
[16:13] <asac> well
[16:13] <asac> its important to also show your email to other ubuntu folks
[16:14] <asac> but its definitly the reason why your email is not properly parsed
[16:14] <asac> (given that your email is already everywhere i'd suggest you let it go :))
[16:14] <asac> btw, if you are not logged in all emails are hidden in launchpad
[16:14] <asac> try it
[16:15] <asac> at least they definitly are hidden in bzr code browse
[16:23] <fta> done
[16:23] <asac> great!
[16:23] <asac> yeah
[16:24] <asac> you even have a head more than me ;)
[16:24] <asac> most likely it depends how frequently you are named in log
[16:24] <fta> looks like a bug to me
[16:25] <asac> yeah i think so too ... but its funny ;)
[16:25] <asac> anyway ... i think this is a great release :)
[16:26] <asac> now we have translations left as only really big issue :/
[16:28] <fta> too bad we still have the flash crashes
[16:28] <fta> what do you see when you open this pdf ? http://eloise.cocolog-nifty.com/rodoku/fileschikamatsu/SonezakiShinju_michiyuki.pdf
[16:30] <asac> black garbage
[16:30] <asac> cairo regression?
[16:33] <fta> i don't know
[16:33] <fta> same with xpdf
[16:33] <asac> why do you think itts a good document=
[16:34] <fta> because it comes from a site i often visit
[16:34] <fta> but i don't know about that particular pdf
[17:33] <fta> pkgstriptranslations: xulrunner-1.9-dbgsym does not contain translations, skipping
[17:33] <fta> cp: target `/tmp/pkgstriptranslations.ew7658/source/' is not a directory: No such file or directory
[17:33] <fta> make: *** [binary-strip-IMPL/xulrunner-1.9] Error 1
[17:33] <fta> asac, ^^
[17:33] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13135043/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-sparc.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[18:02] <asac> fta: hmm
[18:02] <asac> appears to be only on sparc
[18:03] <asac> pkgstriptranslations: preparing translation tarball xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386_translations.tar.gz...done (1 files)
[18:03] <asac> pkgmaintainermangler: Not overriding Maintainer for domain lists.ubuntu.com
[18:03] <asac>  \o/ yay it works ;)
[18:04] <asac> rock on
[18:04] <shirish> hi guys, does anybody of an addon which tells about how much time it took for a webpage to render as well as gives a split chart or something of each component
[18:04] <shirish>  know I had seen something like that way way back, but don't remember
[18:04] <asac> hmm
[18:04] <asac> use tools-> addons and search there ?
[18:04] <asac>  :)
[18:06] <asac> lets see when the translation template hits translatinos.launchpad.net
[18:06] <shirish> asac: dunno what keyword to use for that
[18:07] <fta> b5 built on i386 :)
[18:07] <shirish> yeah, that's good news fta ;)
[18:08] <shirish> any idea if xulrunner building great with galeon as well?
[18:10] <shirish> fabien ^
[18:11] <fta> i don't know, i haven't touched galeon in years
[18:11] <fta> it was my main browser for many years
[18:12] <shirish> I use galeon as well ff3
[18:14] <fta> amd64 done too
[18:15] <asac> shirish: most likely not
[18:15] <asac> upstream has to fix it
[18:15] <asac> (e.g. suport xul-1.9
[18:16] <asac> )
[18:16] <shirish> asac: right
[18:16] <asac> if upstream is active at all ;)
[18:16] <shirish> that is false
[18:16] <asac> what is false?
[18:16] <shirish> they have introduced galeon 2.0.5
[18:16] <asac> great
[18:16] <asac> hot that many changes i guess ;)
[18:16] <shirish> few days back
[18:16] <shirish> I have put up a bug report in debian for the same
[18:17] <asac> in previous release they claimed to "support 1.9", but apparently had no clue what that means ;)
[18:17] <shirish> was thinking let it come into experimental/unstable then would give a sync request
[18:17] <shirish> right
[18:17] <asac> shirish: debian has no xul 1.9
[18:17] <shirish> wow, didn't know that
[18:17] <asac> they are lame
[18:18] <asac> and when they release it will most likely be completely broken
[18:18] <shirish> also haven't they forked ff or something to that effect
[18:18] <asac> thats just a rebranding
[18:18] <asac> not a complete fork
[18:19] <asac> we have iceweasel, icedove, iceape in debian
[18:19] <xhaker> shirish: firebug + yslow is what you need for webpage time benchmarking
[18:19] <asac> firebug is either in the archive or waiting for a push
[18:19] <asac> its definitly in our firefox-extensions project on LP ... ready.
[18:19] <shirish> firebug+yslow ok
[18:19] <shirish> asac: I think its waiting for a push, I checked the irc logs yesterday and then looked for them today morning
[18:20] <shirish> its 12 hours now, lemme recheck the same
[18:20] <shirish> nope, not till now :(
[18:22] <shirish> asac: its named firebug or something else
[18:29] <asac> bug 194375
[18:29] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 194375 in firefox-extensions "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firebug extension" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194375
[18:29] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firebug/1.1.0~b11+svn317-0ubuntu2
[18:29] <asac> ok sits in binary NEW
[18:31] <shirish> asac: so its going to take a day or something?
[18:31] <asac> next time an archive admin comes around, it will go in
[18:31] <asac> let me ask hobbsee
[18:32] <asac> asked
[18:32] <asac> lets see if she is awake
[18:34] <shirish> she has been idle for sometime.
[18:34] <shirish> anyway bbiaf
[18:35] <asac> shirish: she lives in australia :)
[18:35] <asac> @time australia
[18:35] <asac> @time sydney
[18:35] <ubotu> Current time in Australia/Sydney: April 06 2008, 03:35:17 - Next meeting: Server Team in 4 days
[18:35] <shirish> ok, that explains it :)
[18:42] <asac> fta: what do you think about the changelog format?
[18:43] <asac> i consider to not use * XXXX <asac...> ... but * Signed-Off: XXXX
[18:43] <asac> of * Credits: ....
[18:44] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[18:44] <asac> aeh ... https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/firefox-3.0/3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[18:44] <asac> thats it
[18:56] <asac> ok ... as hard as this might sound. i am working on fixing icedove today
[18:56] <asac> otherwise debian folks will shoot me if they come to hamburg i guess
[18:57] <fta> :)
[18:58] <asac> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=src&data=icedove&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious
[18:58] <asac> those are the grave bugs ;)
[18:59] <asac> #461981: icedove: the new package on powerpc does not work  => 74 days old
[18:59] <asac> dear
[18:59] <asac> debian bug 463062
[18:59] <ubotu> Debian bug 463062 in icedove "icedove corrrupts mail cache repeatedly" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/463062
[18:59] <asac> i doubt that thats a valid bug ;)
[18:59] <asac> at least not due to my packaging
[18:59] <asac> debian bug 468353
[18:59] <ubotu> Debian bug 468353 in icedove "crash: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: double free or corruption (out): 0xb65acd40 ***" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/468353
[19:00] <asac> fta: do you want to upload to debian directly? i think there is a control field that i could add to allow you to upload icedove directly ;)
[19:00] <asac> hehe
[19:00] <asac> debian bug 470168
[19:00] <ubotu> Debian bug 470168 in icedove "iceweasel & icedove crashed, corrupted filesystem, ~/.mozilla-thunderbird became a pipe" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/470168
[19:01] <asac> hell whats that
[19:01] <asac> .mozilla-thunderbird _became a pipe_
[19:01] <asac> read that twice
[19:01] <asac> debian bug 470542
[19:01] <fta> I need your help for prism
[19:01] <ubotu> Debian bug 470542 in icedove "icedove 2.0.0.9-3: 100%cpu consumption and unusable" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/470542
[19:01] <asac> thats not a grave bug for sure
[19:01] <asac> fta: what can i do?
[19:01] <asac> debian bug 470128
[19:01] <ubotu> Debian bug 470128 in icedove "xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/470128
[19:01] <asac> ok thats what i know how to fix ;)
[19:02] <fta> help me find what's wrong :)
[19:02] <asac> fta: does dom-inspector work now?
[19:02] <asac> i haven't tested ... just bumped the maxVersion ;)
[19:03] <asac> ubufox was a really great release .... it closed more than a half of the open bugs in changelog \o/
[19:03] <asac> if that could ever happen to firefox i would burst out in tears
[19:04] <asac> fta: whats wrong?
[19:04] <asac> :)
[19:04] <asac> completely broken?
[19:05] <asac> fta: in configure.in ... if i want external env variable to overload the default, do i need to do anything?
[19:05] <asac> like test -n "$OS_ARCH" && OS_ARCH=Default ?
[19:05] <asac> or is that done automagically?
[19:06] <fta> no it's not. if it assigns a default value,  it will erase yours
[19:06] <asac> ok ... so i have to check that manually
[19:06] <asac> thats what i thought, but i remember that in gnash it worked automagically for some
[19:06] <asac> fta: tell me whats up with your prism thing
[19:08] <fta> grab https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/prism/prism
[19:09] <fta> merge with the source
[19:09] <fta> run autoconf2.13 + ./configure --with-libxul-sdk=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9b5
[19:09] <fta> make
[19:09] <fta> and try dist/bin/prism
[19:09] <fta> and try dist/bin/prism -jsconsole
[19:10] <fta> (debian/rules is not updated yet)
[19:11] <asac> where is the source?
[19:11] <asac> fta: can you bring that up into bzr as .upstream branch?
[19:11] <fta> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tarballs/prism_0.9+svn20080403r11903.orig.tar.gz
[19:11] <asac> you can ask for sync in launchpad for svn
[19:12] <asac> fta: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/prism/trunk
[19:12] <fta> well, i want to post the build system patch in bugzilla
[19:12] <asac> can you ask for a sync?
[19:12] <asac> yeah
[19:12] <asac> i can try now
[19:12] <asac> but i'd love to have everything we deal with that can be synched in lp
[19:13] <asac> ok merged
[19:13] <fta> build it
[19:13] <fta> it will create deb but ignore them
[19:13] <asac> fta: there is no configure.in
[19:14] <asac> no idea whats going on
[19:14] <fta> build it, it's needed to apply the patches and do a subst o, the .ini
[19:14] <asac> i am in prism/ directory
[19:14] <asac> ok
[19:14] <asac> oh ... no cdbs?
[19:15] <fta> not yet
[19:15] <fta> i will trash most of debian/rules once this build system is ok
[19:16] <asac> fta: why do you want to use the mozilla build system?
[19:16] <asac> why not plain configure.ac + automake?
[19:16] <fta> because that's what upstream wants
[19:17] <fta> there are two xpi now, and soon some binaries
[19:17] <fta> already on mac and win
[19:17] <asac> is upstream aware the mozilla build-system is one of the most rotten things on earth;) .... mozilla only keeps it because they fear regressions ;)
[19:18] <asac> and they switch to python for mozilla 2
[19:18] <asac> anyway
[19:18] <asac> it built and starts
[19:18] <asac> whats the issue?
[19:18] <fta> you can't get anything to work except the initial dialog
[19:18] <asac> ok
[19:19] <fta> try -webapp path/to/a/webapp
[19:19] <asac> Error: Cc['@mozilla.org/desktop-environment;1'] is undefined
[19:19] <asac> Source File: chrome://webrunner/content/webrunner.js
[19:19] <asac> Line: 511
[19:19] <asac> you really have to tell me more ... is that a recent regression?
[19:20] <asac> or is that only reproducible with your build system?
[19:20] <fta> 0.8 was ok. 0.9 changed a lot
[19:21] <fta> well, the debs don't work either
[19:21] <fta> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/prism.png
[19:23] <asac> fta: there is no DesktopEnvionrment for unix
[19:24] <asac> no doubt thats one of the issues (as we see an uncatched exception resolving @mozilla.org/desktop-enviornment
[19:24] <fta> the docshell seems to prevent the main window to appear
[19:24] <asac> either fix prism to survive a non existing component or code that for unix/linux
[19:24] <fta> hm
[19:26] <asac> fta: wanna give me a patch to you?
[19:27] <asac> fta: look at the apprunner.js line 511
[19:28] <asac> if that throws an exception then delayedStartup is not called at all (see a few lines below in setTimeout)
[19:28] <asac> you should deal with that situation by just catching the exception and somehow taking care that the missing features get disabled for the time after that
[19:28] <asac> but i think catching that exception should at least help you to get further now
[19:29] <asac> copy?
[19:31] <asac> but coding the desktop envioronment for unix shouldn't bet that hard either ;)
[19:31] <asac> a bit low level stuff, but in general doable i guess
[19:34] <fta> hmmn i thought it was supposed to work and then it was just a packaging issue
[19:35] <fta> bug 212416
[19:35] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 212416 in firefox-3.0 "latest xulrunner-1.9 update breaks firefox-3.0" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212416
[19:38] <asac> damn
[19:38] <asac> i have to talk to mvo
[19:38] <asac> he said that versioned Breaks: does the right thing
[19:39] <fta> not if people force it
[19:39] <asac> how?
[19:39] <asac> dist-upgrade?
[19:39] <fta> yes
[19:39] <asac> well ... its the most graceful thing we can do right now
[19:39] <asac> tightening up depends with upper bounds on firefox side is just too bad to pursue
[19:40] <fta> that happens only when the upgrade in the middle (xul avail, but not ff3 yet)
[19:40] <asac> yeah sure
[19:40] <fta> they
[19:41] <fta> seems ff3 is not avail on i386 yet
[19:41] <fta> firefox-3.0 | 3.0~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
[19:41] <fta> firefox-3.0 | 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources
[19:44] <asac> bug 212416
[19:44] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 212416 in firefox-3.0 "latest xulrunner-1.9 update breaks firefox-3.0" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212416
[19:44] <asac> back to incomplete
[19:46] <fta> how does the kernel handle this ? they have to update nvidia at the same time too
[19:49] <asac> fta: they have a meta package
[19:49] <asac> that they bump once everything is available
[19:57] <Jazzva> asac, ping...
[19:59] <asac> pongy
[19:59] <asac> Jazzva: ^^
[19:59] <Jazzva> Hey, hey...
[19:59] <Jazzva> Did you have time to look at the packaging?
[20:00] <asac> no ;) ... isn't it ok?
[20:00] <asac> :-P
[20:00] <asac> Jazzva: ah
[20:01] <asac> you were gone yesterday
[20:01] <asac> the http header problem is that they use contents.rdf instead of chrome.manifest ... which isn't support natively on 1.9 branch anymore
[20:01] <Jazzva> damn it... any fix for that?
[20:01] <asac> Jazzva: just write a chrome.manifest
[20:01] <asac> that should be simple
[20:01] <Jazzva> Ok, just to check the structure of both files first :)?
[20:02] <Jazzva> ?=...
[20:02] <asac> its shipped in top level directlry of .xpi
[20:02] <Jazzva> Should I write it manually, put it in debian and then move it in debian/rules
[20:02] <Jazzva> ?
[20:02] <asac> Jazzva: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Chrome_Registration
[20:02] <Jazzva> Thanks...
[20:02] <asac> there are examples for content, locale and skin
[20:02] <asac> that should be enough
[20:03] <Jazzva> Ok...
[20:03] <asac> if you have concrete problems let me know
[20:03] <Jazzva> I will...
[20:07] <asac> Jazzva: look in the other extensions . there should be plenty of examples
[20:07] <Jazzva> Doing that... :)
[20:10] <Jazzva> asac: Could you also try the mozilla-stumbleupon? They are using chrome.manifest, but it's not showing up... It might be something wrong with my FF...
[20:22] <asac> Jazzva: you can remove the files in your profile that match extensions.*
[20:22] <asac> then start ffox
[20:22] <asac> that should clean up anything that might be broken in your profile
[20:23] <asac> e.g. reregistering extensions and all that
[20:23] <Jazzva> ok... I'll try that ...
[20:30] <asac> fta: did you try to wrap prism thing with a try { } catch?
[20:31] <asac> looks like they make extensive use of desktop-environment now
[20:31] <asac> so maybe its worth to implement
[20:41] <fta> if you feel like doing it, please, feel free
[20:42] <asac> yeah ;) ... definitly not before release
[20:44] <fta> ?
[21:19] <asac> fta: did you ever get a stacktrace with xul symbols out of your flash thing?
[21:19] <asac> i am looking at bug 207907
[21:19] <ubotu> Bug 207907 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/207907 is private
[21:19] <asac> that code looks definitly wrong
[21:20] <asac> [reed]: i think there is something wrong with the patch for mozilla bug 386844 that you landed
[21:20] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 386844 in Plug-ins "Crash when running Java Applets [@ XSync - JavaPluginInstance5::SetWindow]" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386844
[21:20] <fta> no, i didn't.
[21:22] <asac> [reed]: look at stacktrace in bug 207907 ... and the comment i will drop in a minute
[21:22] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 207907 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Beta 4 crashed while displaying a flash-popup" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207907
[21:45] <Jazzva> asac, LiveHTTPHeaders is working :)... I'll push the branch in few minutes...
[21:46] <Jazzva> just to move chrome.manifest to debian
[21:49] <asac> Jazzva: to debian?
[21:49] <asac> you can just commit that in .ubuntu branch
[21:49] <asac> thats the idea of the .upstream + ubuntu branch split
[21:49] <Jazzva> I will...
[21:50] <asac> no need to maintain patches/ or fix files during build
[21:50] <asac> just commit as usual
[21:50] <Jazzva> Oh... So, I can leave it in top level?
[21:50] <asac> but remember to properly document that in changelog and commit message
[21:50] <Jazzva> asac ^^
[21:55] <asac> Jazzva: yes. just commit it
[21:55] <asac> if top level is upstream top level
[21:55] <Jazzva> k
[21:55] <asac> and forward that upstream so hopefully it will be included at some point
[22:14] <fta> Using saved location: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.head/
[22:14] <fta> bzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged. Use the merge command to reconcile them.
[22:14] <fta> asac, ?
[22:15] <Volans> Hi asac, we are ready with the package (if is not too late), you can find it here: http://debomatic.linuxdc.it/hardy/result/ubuntu-it-menu_1.0.6-0ubuntu1/
[22:15] <Volans> sorry for the delay due to a little problem encountered
[22:17] <asac> fta: well ... i pushed without overwrite
[22:17] <asac> and didn't merge in advance ...
[22:17] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6505/
[22:18] <asac> so you probably committed something locally that you didn't push yet
[22:18] <asac> fta: remember that  bzr merge will eliminate my revisions
[22:18] <asac> pull first and merge your branch on top
[22:18] <fta> I can't pull
[22:19] <fta> diverged
[22:19] <asac> pull new ... merge your branch over
[22:21] <warp10> Hi all!
[22:22] <asac> warp10: hi
[22:22] <warp10> hey asac
[22:24] <fta> asac, I don't get why bzr wants to revert 12+ commits when just the last one diverged
[22:25] <asac> fta: no idea ... it won't revert anything if you branch a few checkout and merge your local branch to that
[22:25] <asac> i will try to look closer what merge does when i get diverged again at some point
[22:26] <asac> warp10: new channel member or just a question?
[22:26] <asac> ;)
[22:27] <warp10> asac: no questions now... but maybe I will get closer to mozilla packages for Intrepid :)
[22:28] <asac> great. welcome then ;)
[22:28] <warp10> thank you! :)
[22:36] <Volans> asac: I hope it is not too late for including it in Hardy, anyway
[22:37] <asac> Volans: did you file a bug against firefox-extensions project ... please do so: ask for REVIEW/SPONSORSHIP
[22:37] <asac> and attach the required files to the bug report
[22:37] <asac> and add your extension the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions wiki page
[22:37] <asac> with yourself as QA Contact
[22:43] <Volans> asac for the bug the required files are: orig.tar.gz, diff.gz e dsc ?
[22:44] <asac> yes
[22:45] <cosmodad> heya. I was curious about when TB 3 will be part of Ubuntu. I guess it won't make it into Hardy anymore, or will it?
[22:45] <fta> it wont
[22:46] <cosmodad> is 8.10 a good prediction for TB 3?
[22:46] <cosmodad> let me rephrase: how much longer is the 2.x branch going to be developed?
[22:47] <fta> not sure. they didn't announce a roadmap, afair
[22:47] <fta> i have it packaged for hardy if that's the question but it's pre alpha 1
[22:48] <fta> so there's still a long way to go
[22:48] <Jazzva> asac: stumbleupon is fixed too... The problem was that I used lowercase id to declare MOZ_XPI_EMID, but it wasn't all lowercase in install.rdf, so there was a problem :)
[22:48] <cosmodad> I'm asking because there is a patch for a movemail bug but it's only working "against 1.8 branch, [...] and as such it works when building TB 3 or SM 2 from trunk".
[22:49] <cosmodad> sorry *not* against 1.8
[22:49] <cosmodad> but trunk
[22:49] <cosmodad> how's the 1.8 branch related to 2.x?
[22:49] <fta> 1.8 is the gecko part, the core, used by tb2
[22:49] <fta> tb3 uses 1.9
[22:51] <cosmodad> I wonder why patches are released for trunk when there isn't even a roadmap leading to TB 3.
[22:51] <cosmodad> assuming that TB 2 will be in action for quite a while.
[22:53] <asac> Jazzva: goof
[22:53] <asac> god
[22:53] <asac> ;)
[22:53] <Jazzva> lol
[22:53] <Jazzva> Yay... made it by saturday midnight :)
[22:53] <asac> thats cool
[22:53] <Volans> asac: wiki updated, bug updated ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/+bug/112846 ) I hope in the right way
[22:53] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 112846 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Ubuntu-it Menu (Firefox extension)" [Wishlist,Triaged]
[22:53] <fta> cosmodad, maybe ask on moznet, this has nothing to do with ubuntu. we package what they produce.
[22:53] <Jazzva> thanks for your help :)... I think I'd never guess the contents.rdg => chrome.manifest part
[22:54] <asac> Volans: looking
[22:54] <cosmodad> fta: you are right. I guess I will just comment the bug report.
[22:54] <asac> cosmodad: trunk is current development focs
[22:54] <asac> focus
[22:54] <asac> nothing new is introduced on 1.8 branch
[22:54] <cosmodad> asac: not even bug fixes?
[22:55] <asac> tbird was more or less in sync wth ffox 1.8, but for trunk it isn't
[22:55] <asac> cosmodad: bug fixes only for regressions and high impact bugs
[22:55] <asac> given that movemail was never really officially supported i doubt that it qualifies for that
[22:55] <cosmodad> darn. :/
[22:55] <asac> however, i think it could go in, but its hard to find someone investing time in 1.8 branch
[22:56] <cosmodad> wish I knew enough about the TB code to do modify the patch on my own.
[22:56] <asac> cosmodad: learning by doing ;)
[22:56] <cosmodad> it's only a bunch of lines, and the patch applies, but it's not working.
[22:56] <asac> well tbird 3 is most likely still shaky
[22:56] <fta> asac, are we releasing extensions with b4 hardcoded ?
[22:56] <asac> fta: do we?
[22:56] <asac> thats a bug. i tried to take care that thats not happening
[22:57] <fta> asblock+
[22:57] <fta> adblock+
[22:57] <asac> but maybe i missed it her and there
[22:57] <asac> yeah ... thats not me
[22:57] <asac> rainct is motu ...
[22:57] <asac> we should fix that though
[22:57] <cosmodad> asac: could the patch be introduced to TB 2 by some Ubuntu group, e.g. your team, MOTU, whatever?
[22:57] <asac> fta: let me fix it
[22:58] <asac> cosmodad: i think we have no time right now. i guess there is already a bug open
[22:58] <asac> iirc it already has a patch
[22:58] <asac> maybe take a look
[22:58] <cosmodad> asac: the bug is filed, but there was no patch 24h ago.
[22:59] <cosmodad> asac: there's only one patch in mozilla bugzilla, but like I said, it only applies against trunk.
[22:59] <asac> cosmodad: i mean bug in launchpad
[22:59] <fta> asac, i'm using a devel version but users are complaining in the forum and are now jumping on the tester extension :P
[23:00] <cosmodad> asac: yeah the bug is filed in LP, but no fix available.
[23:00] <asac> fta: please deescalate in the forum, comment and say that an upgrade will be available in a few
[23:00] <asac> thanks
[23:04] <fta> done
[23:09] <asac> fta: its bug 203015 ...  he didn't commit to bzr back then
[23:09] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 203015 in adblock-plus "not compatible with firefox 3.0b4" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/203015
[23:09] <asac> i will just upload again
[23:09] <asac> ubuntu3
[23:09] <asac> and push that to branch
[23:09] <asac> ok fix uploaded
[23:10] <fta> thx for them ;)
[23:11] <asac> can we monitor all branches and kick people when a higher version appears in archive then in bzr?
[23:19] <fta> easy :)
[23:22] <asac> uploading icedove beast
[23:22] <asac> eat this ;)
[23:31] <asac> jimmy_: that gconf patch is really dirty
[23:31] <asac> jimmy_: you didn't upgrade the UPSTREAM branch?
[23:31] <asac> jimmy_: thats really much work for me now
[23:34] <Volans> by the way asac, have you had the time to look if all was fine?
[23:35] <asac> jimmy_: please provide me a clean one first thing on monday. otherwise we cannot support gconf in midbrowser hardy
[23:35] <Jazzva> asac: anything left for those extensions, or is it up to the archive team now?
[23:36] <Jazzva> *left for me to do
[23:36] <asac> Jazzva: i think 4 are not uploaded yet
[23:36] <asac> Jazzva: what about those that are not yet upgraded?
[23:36] <asac> Jazzva: we need to move them to firefox-2
[23:36] <asac> if we cannot fix them
[23:36] <Jazzva> asac: ok... I'll provide a fix for those that are not compatible for sure...
[23:37] <Jazzva> bug report + diff?
[23:37] <asac> yes.
[23:37] <asac> that should be ok
[23:37] <Jazzva> and firefox extensions + mozillateam?
[23:37] <asac> maybe note the bug in the table of extensions page
[23:37] <asac> Jazzva: yes, upstream firefox extensions would be helpful
[23:37] <asac> i don't read bugmail right now ... so mozillateam is not helpful
[23:37] <asac> :)
[23:38] <Jazzva> oh, it's good to know :)
[23:38] <asac> well. i think i should filter mozillateam mail somewhere else
[23:38] <asac> it should be far less
[23:38] <asac> most goes to mozilla-bugs (hopefully)
[23:44] <asac> this upload to dewbian is really creeping along
[23:47] <asac> Jazzva: can you send a message on such a bug again?
[23:48] <Jazzva> asac: huh?
[23:48] <Jazzva> :)
[23:48] <asac> yay ... deleted 10000 unread mails in ubuntu-bugs ;)
[23:49] <asac> now directing to /dev/null ;)
[23:49] <Jazzva> soooo ... i need to resend bugmails? :)
[23:49] <asac> Jazzva: the idea was to see if it ends up in my high prio folder now
[23:49] <asac> if you send a message on firefox-extensions
[23:49] <Jazzva> ok, i'll write something in a few minutes...
[23:50] <asac> let me know ;)
[23:56] <Jazzva> asac, done... edited the description for bug 205172
[23:56] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 205172 in greasemonkey "REVIEW/SPONSOR: please review and sponsor firefox-greasemonkey" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205172
[23:57] <fta> asac, why did you post a midbrowser patch to bug 23369 ?
[23:58] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 23369 in firefox "firefox(-gnome-support) should get proxy from gconf" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23369
[23:59] <asac> fta: well. thats the gconf backend patch against xul 1.9
[23:59] <Jazzva> Hmm, I thought that description editing will send a notice to subscribers