| ubotu | New bug: #215448 in malone "Should strip gpg signatures for attachments" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215448 | 01:21 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Ooo, yeah. | 01:21 |
| mtaylor | kiko: hey... how do I keep a package in a PPA from building for lpia? | 01:57 |
| mtaylor | kiko: I've got one with mono depends which don't seem to be in gutsy for lpia, and I'd love to mark it as "don't bother" | 01:57 |
| cprov-out | mtaylor: restrict the control file Architecture field | 01:58 |
| mtaylor | cprov-out: isn't that just for the binary packages? | 01:58 |
| mtaylor | or the binary sections, rather? | 01:59 |
| cprov-out | mtaylor: well, it controls in which architecture you want to build a given binary package, if instead of 'any' you specify 'i386 amd64' it won't build in lpia | 02:00 |
| mtaylor | cprov-out: right... but I'm erroring out in missing build depends... | 02:00 |
| mtaylor | so I'm trying to prevent it from even loading up a vm and starting... | 02:01 |
| cprov-out | mtaylor: sorry, I don't understand what you mean. loading where ? | 02:02 |
| mtaylor | a PPA | 02:02 |
| mtaylor | in a PPA | 02:02 |
| mtaylor | cprov-out: so, I upload the source package for gutsy | 02:02 |
| mtaylor | and it tries to build it against i386 amd64 and lpia, but I konw that the lpia build is going to fail for gutsy - and that it's going to fail in the build-dep step | 02:03 |
| mtaylor | and I don't really care about that - so I'd like to just skip it | 02:03 |
| kiko | mtaylor, what cprov-out said -- update the control file to not build it on that arch. | 02:03 |
| mtaylor | do I need to do the architecture field of all of the binary sections? | 02:04 |
| cprov-out | mtaylor: okay, so far ... upload a new source that won't build in lpia, change the Architecture in the control file as I've suggested. | 02:04 |
| kiko | yes -- one for each binary, mt | 02:04 |
| kiko | mtaylor, | 02:04 |
| mtaylor | ok | 02:04 |
| === kiko is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
| kiko-zzz | cprov-out, now -- to to bed. :) | 02:05 |
| * kiko-zzz goes too | 02:05 | |
| cprov-out | mtaylor: s/any/i386 amd64 (leave the 'all' alone) | 02:05 |
| cprov-out | kiko-zzz: not yet, I have a review to reply, but g'night :) | 02:05 |
| mtaylor | sweet. thanks guys | 02:06 |
| YokoZar | My emails to ubuntu-devel are still getting put in the moderation queue despite me being in the Ubuntu Developer group. Do I have to use a specific address, or can I use any of my confirmed launchpad emails? | 02:58 |
| YokoZar | Or is it because I have to sign my emails? | 02:58 |
| jamesh | YokoZar: ubuntu-devel is not managed by launchpad | 03:00 |
| jamesh | so you need to subscribe any emails you want to post as at https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel | 03:01 |
| YokoZar | jamesh: I was hoping someone would know how the scripts interact, because it somehow uses the ubuntu devel group as a validation | 03:01 |
| jamesh | which scripts are you referring to? | 03:02 |
| YokoZar | Or maybe I'm mistaken and new Ubuntu devs have to be manually added to the mailing list by the admin | 03:02 |
| YokoZar | I just assumed there was some sort of "ask launchpad if this email is an ubuntu dev, if not put in moderation queue" type script going on | 03:03 |
| jamesh | you need to subscribe to the mailing list yourself | 03:03 |
| jamesh | see the URL I posted above | 03:03 |
| YokoZar | I'm already subscribed though, since before I was a dev | 03:03 |
| YokoZar | I'll try removing/redoing it, maybe that'll refresh it | 03:03 |
| jamesh | YokoZar: we do have mailing list support in Launchpad now, but the existing Ubuntu mailing lists haven't been migrated to that infrastructure | 03:04 |
| jamesh | that will likely happen in the future | 03:04 |
| YokoZar | Thanks | 03:04 |
| jamesh | once that's done, you'll be able to post with any email registered to your LP account, and you'll only get first post moderation once for all lists | 03:04 |
| jamesh | rather than once for each list | 03:04 |
| jamesh | (in cases where you aren't a list member, that is) | 03:05 |
| YokoZar | I think I figured out the problem - I registered a long time ago with an address that now forwards to my current one; since I was sending from my new address, it thought me not a subscriber | 03:14 |
| YokoZar | Thanks for your help :) | 03:14 |
| jamesh | YokoZar: you can subscribe multiple addresses to the list, and set them as no email if you want | 03:19 |
| jamesh | that way you can post from multiple addresses but receive email on only one | 03:19 |
| emgent | good night people | 04:08 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| jtv | mdke: ping | 07:19 |
| mdke | jtv: (In case I'm not around at the moment, please provide a bit of information about what you want and I will respond when I get back) | 07:19 |
| carlos | morning | 07:30 |
| mpt | Gooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders! | 08:00 |
| jml | morning. pshaw. | 08:04 |
| jml | mpt: changing hemispheres has you all topsy turvy! | 08:04 |
| jml | next thing you know, you'll be saying that the sun rises in the west and eggs should be cracked with a fork! | 08:05 |
| mpt | Eggs should be cracked with a frying pan. | 08:05 |
| mdke | morning all | 08:08 |
| * mdke winces at mention of eggs | 08:09 | |
| mdke | jtv: pong; saw your email, and am pretty excited :) | 08:09 |
| mdke | sounds awesome | 08:09 |
| AnAnt | Hello | 08:12 |
| AnAnt | a question about SVN imports | 08:12 |
| AnAnt | does that mean that I should continue using the SVN or the BZR ? | 08:13 |
| AnAnt | because I see a status called "last sync" | 08:13 |
| thumper | AnAnt: it depends | 08:13 |
| AnAnt | thumper: depends on what ? | 08:13 |
| thumper | AnAnt: if you are switching to bzr then just start using bzr | 08:14 |
| thumper | AnAnt: if you want to keep committing to svn then don't | 08:14 |
| AnAnt | sorry, I was lagging | 08:16 |
| AnAnt | thumper: depends on what ? | 08:17 |
| thumper | [19:14] <thumper> AnAnt: if you are switching to bzr then just start using bzr | 08:17 |
| thumper | [19:14] <thumper> AnAnt: if you want to keep committing to svn then don't | 08:17 |
| AnAnt | thumper: ok, I see that the bzr is in ~vcs.imports/ how do I change that to be in my team dir ? | 08:18 |
| thumper | AnAnt: branch from it and push to LP | 08:18 |
| jtv | mdke: cool, just let me know what you need. | 08:18 |
| AnAnt | thumper: you mean: bzr branch http://<~vcs.imports URL> , then bzr push svn+ssh://<my team url> ? | 08:19 |
| mdke | jtv: basically I have been importing po files into the ubuntu-doc branch, and correcting some of them by amending a string and the po-revision-date. I've got a list of them in a file called broken_translations in the branch and need to upload those po files to LP at ubuntu/hardy/+source/ubuntu-docs/templates | 08:20 |
| thumper | AnAnt: if you are using a recent bzr (1.2 or later) then use 'bzr launchpad-login' to identify yourself | 08:20 |
| thumper | AnAnt: then you can go 'bzr branch lp:~vcs-imports/project/name | 08:21 |
| thumper | AnAnt: and 'bzr push lp:~team/project/name' | 08:21 |
| thumper | AnAnt: somewhat smaller | 08:21 |
| AnAnt | ok | 08:21 |
| thumper | I'm looking to change the ui shortly (RSN) | 08:21 |
| AnAnt | how do I tell bzr about my account ? | 08:23 |
| AnAnt | I get: No Launchpad user ID configured. | 08:23 |
| AnAnt | thumper: how do I tell bzr about my account ? | 08:25 |
| mdke | AnAnt: did you see the bit about "bzr launchpad-login" | 08:26 |
| jtv | mdke: argh, the scripts don't support sourcepackage uploads yet. Never mind. Have a URL to that broken_translations file for me? | 08:26 |
| AnAnt | ah, bzr launchpad-login <username> | 08:26 |
| * mpt gets enraged by "There is 1 error" | 08:27 | |
| mpt | I fixed the error, but Launchpad keeps unfixing it | 08:27 |
| mdke | jtv: hang on a tic. (to be honest, I don't really know why we use LP source package translations rather than project translations, it's all a bit confused) | 08:28 |
| jtv | mdke: saves an import step, I guess. Shortens your feedback cycle. | 08:29 |
| mdke | jtv: can LP import translations automatically from a bzr branch yet? | 08:30 |
| mdke | or is that not feasible? | 08:30 |
| jtv | mdke: that's still a long way off. | 08:33 |
| AnAnt | thanks fellows ! | 08:33 |
| mdke | jtv: ah. anyway, we don't really use the automatic import stuff; since all our translations come from LP anyway | 08:34 |
| mdke | it's no big deal to upload pot files | 08:35 |
| jtv | mdke: the file you're digging up links to the updated PO files, right? | 08:35 |
| mdke | jtv: not really, it just lists them. what do you mean by links? | 08:35 |
| jtv | mdke: just so I can unambiguously find the right ones. | 08:36 |
| mdke | jtv: yes, that will be ok. I'm just waiting for a commit to go through | 08:36 |
| jtv | ok | 08:36 |
| mdke | jtv: but at the moment I haven't finished correcting all the translations, it would just be to show you how things are set up, for now. I expect that all the translations will be fixed by the weekend | 08:37 |
| jtv | mdke: okay, if you send them to me now I can start scripting. | 08:38 |
| jtv | mdke: the problem was that you don't have upload privileges, right? | 08:41 |
| jtv | mdke: going for a post-lunch walk first though. :-) | 08:41 |
| mdke | jtv: yes; I had upload privileges for some languages but not others | 08:43 |
| mdke | damn this commit is taking a long time | 08:43 |
| mdke | jtv: ok, my commit hasn't finished and I need to go to work, so i'll just tell you. In the https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ubuntu-doc/ubuntu-hardy branch, it is at ubuntu/broken_translations, and the templates referred to are all at ubuntu/$templatename | 08:47 |
| mdke | jtv: (except for one, serverguide, which is at generic/serverguide) | 08:47 |
| mdke | jtv: for the next release I've simplified the branch structure a lot so it is more straightforward | 08:48 |
| jtv | mdke: ok, thanks. | 08:48 |
| mdke | jtv: the broken translations file has some asterisks in it, which are just for my benefit so can see which translations I fixed already; I'll take them out when everything is fixed | 08:48 |
| mdke | jtv: thanks to you :) | 08:49 |
| jtv | mdke: as I like to say, thank me when it's done. :-) | 08:50 |
| mdke | i will :D | 08:50 |
| mdke | bye | 08:50 |
| jtv | bye | 08:50 |
| ubotu | New bug: #215537 in malone "Correcting unknown package by choosing "I don't know" gives further mysterious error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215537 | 08:51 |
| Fujitsu | Hm, I think that's a dupe. | 08:52 |
| Fujitsu | Indeed, bug #189522. | 08:54 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 189522 in malone ""I don't know" refused when reporting a bug" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189522 | 08:54 |
| Fujitsu | mpt: You even replied to that bug yourself. | 08:54 |
| mpt | Fujitsu, I saw that report when reporting the new one | 08:55 |
| Fujitsu | Is the new one different in some way? | 08:55 |
| mpt | 189522 doesn't have enough information for me to tell whether it's the same bug | 08:55 |
| mpt | but it seems unlikely that it is | 08:56 |
| Fujitsu | 189522's reporter complains that he can't choose "I don't know". You do too in 215537. Is it particularly likely that it's broken in two ways? | 08:57 |
| mpt | In David's case he (apparently) chose "I don't know" to start with, whereas I chose a package name to start with. | 08:57 |
| Fujitsu | Ah. So it could well be. | 08:57 |
| * Fujitsu returns to his cave. | 08:58 | |
| mpt | Bug 102216 is in a similar predicament -- I can't reproduce it, it might be the same bug as the one I just reported, but it seems unlikely. | 09:00 |
| ubotu | Launchpad bug 102216 in ubuntu "[malone] Still finds an error when chosen dont know for package name" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/102216 | 09:00 |
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #215557 in launchpad-buildd "open-iscsi fails to install" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215557 | 10:06 |
| Kmos | https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/ftp.dei.uc.pt-archive2 -> could some LP admin remove my entry that is duplicate? | 10:16 |
| \sh | guys, when is the publisher for ppa running? every XX mins? | 10:17 |
| === mtaylor is now known as mtaylor|away | ||
| Fujitsu | \sh: */20 | 10:19 |
| \sh | Fujitsu, thx :) | 10:20 |
| ubotu | New bug: #215575 in launchpad "xorg-driver-fglrx cannot be selected as package to report bug about" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215575 | 10:35 |
| muffinresearch | Quick question. Does launchpad have any kind of web service or API? | 11:58 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| nouri | Hi. Is there a way to send bug e-mails to an arbitrary e-mail address? | 12:21 |
| nouri | I want to send bug mails to a list. (And I found out too late that launchpad itself has lists now.) | 12:21 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-luncheon | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #215628 in soyuz "Require a script to unembargo private packages" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215628 | 12:51 |
| ignas | hi | 13:13 |
| === mrevell-luncheon is now known as mrevell | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #215661 in launchpad "PPA should allow multiple versions of a package to be present" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215661 | 13:47 |
| ubotu | New bug: #215665 in malone "impossible to install hardy in LVM" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215665 | 13:47 |
| === vednis is now known as mars | ||
| === matsubara_ is now known as matsubara | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #137440 in launchpad-documentation "Launchpad application tours don't close the deal" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/137440 | 14:32 |
| === fdd_0 is now known as fdd | ||
| === jdahlin_ is now known as jdahlin | ||
| * Hobbsee stabs packages that dont' built. | 15:21 | |
| Hobbsee | er, build | 15:21 |
| ignas | i am having a small problem with PPA | 15:23 |
| ignas | i made the mistake of deleting a package from there | 15:23 |
| Hobbsee | shoot | 15:23 |
| ignas | now i have files in there that do not allow me to reupload the package | 15:23 |
| ignas | and i can't find a way to make it rebuild the package | 15:23 |
| ignas | the package was broken, but at least it was apt-get installable for some value of apt-get installable | 15:24 |
| Hobbsee | upload a higher version? | 15:24 |
| ignas | automatically generated stuff so making it create something a version higher is a bit problematic | 15:25 |
| Hobbsee | because the stuff all autogenerates again, each time? | 15:25 |
| ignas | no, because the code that would detect what "debian" versions are available is not there ;) | 15:26 |
| ignas | so if the package i am generating a deb from is the same - i will get the same debian package version | 15:26 |
| Hobbsee | sounds like the package is broken. | 15:27 |
| ignas | which package? | 15:27 |
| Hobbsee | your package | 15:28 |
| ignas | the idea is this - i take a python egg, run it through a script, and get all the parts needed to upload it to PPA | 15:28 |
| ignas | like .changes .dsc the diff and the tarball | 15:28 |
| ignas | automatically | 15:28 |
| ignas | as that is the only way i can generate the deb at the moment | 15:29 |
| ignas | i can't really create zope.i18n_3.4.0-2 | 15:29 |
| ignas | and as 3.4.0-1 was uploaded to launchpad | 15:29 |
| ignas | and then deleted | 15:29 |
| ignas | i can't upload 3.4.0-1 again | 15:29 |
| Hobbsee | why? | 15:29 |
| ignas | because ppa does not allow me that | 15:30 |
| ignas | it deleted the deb | 15:30 |
| Hobbsee | if you wait for the cron job, you can actually upload it again. | 15:30 |
| Hobbsee | oh, so this is not true delete. | 15:30 |
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: might be able to help you do a true delete | 15:30 |
| ignas | i don't know what a true delete is ... | 15:31 |
| Hobbsee | stuff that deletes both binary and source | 15:31 |
| ignas | i see | 15:31 |
| ignas | only admins can do it? | 15:31 |
| Hobbsee | apparnetly so | 15:31 |
| * Hobbsee does not work on launchpad | 15:32 | |
| Hobbsee | ignas: is it really helpful to have created a build system where you cannot do a rebuild, for any reason? | 15:34 |
| sayers | Launchpad is a very cool tool. | 15:34 |
| ignas | i can do a rebuild, problem is that if I fix a package, i can't upload the fixed package if it's already there | 15:34 |
| ignas | unless i do a "new release" | 15:35 |
| ignas | as in - debian release | 15:35 |
| cprov-out | ignas: the disk-remover is running each 30 minutes are you sure that the files still on disk. Point me to your PPA. | 15:35 |
| ignas | cprov-out: https://edge.launchpad.net/~schooltool-owners/+archive?field.name_filter=zope.i18n&field.status_filter=any | 15:36 |
| ignas | zope.i18n 3.4.0 is the problematic package | 15:36 |
| Hobbsee | fricking launchpad. | 15:46 |
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: please investigate OOPS-832EA102 | 15:46 |
| Hobbsee | and OOPS-832EA103 | 15:47 |
| Hobbsee | come on, this was working for gutsy... | 15:48 |
| Hobbsee | it shouldn't die around hardy freeze time. | 15:49 |
| cprov-out | ignas: the files you've mentioned are not in pool since 2,5 hours ago, you should be able to re-upload the same version. | 15:49 |
| ignas | i see, i saw them listed when i expanded package description so i assumed they still are in there | 15:50 |
| ignas | got "Already uploaded to ppa.launchpad.net" | 15:50 |
| ignas | "Doing nothing for python-zope.i18n_3.4.0-1_source.changes" | 15:50 |
| Hobbsee | ignas: use dput -f | 15:51 |
| cprov-out | ignas: :) dput is silly | 15:51 |
| * Hobbsee tries the workaround | 15:51 | |
| ignas | cprov-out: thanks, that fixed it | 15:51 |
| * Hobbsee stabs. | 15:51 | |
| Hobbsee | workaround doesn't work. | 15:52 |
| cprov-out | ignas: too early ... wait some minutes to thank us. | 15:52 |
| ignas | :) | 15:52 |
| Hobbsee | no way to do release management work on launchpad any more. Not happy. Please fix. Thanks in advance. | 15:52 |
| cprov-out | Hobbsee: let's check your oops. You, impatient child :P | 15:54 |
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: it's 1am. I'm not so patient when i want the stuff to build before i go to bed. | 15:54 |
| === mtaylor is now known as mtaylor|to-home | ||
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: and i don't think slangasek suddenly wants to do all the universe stuff, too. | 15:55 |
| cprov-out | Hobbsee: it was a timeout, did you try again ? | 15:55 |
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: 3 times on edge, 2 on normal LP. | 15:55 |
| Hobbsee | no dice. | 15:56 |
| Hobbsee | hiya mthaddon | 15:59 |
| mthaddon | hey Hobbsee | 15:59 |
| Hobbsee | cprov-out: can you ping me when you get it fixed please? | 16:03 |
| * Hobbsee heads to bed | 16:03 | |
| cprov-out | Hobbsee: okay, good night. | 16:04 |
| Hobbsee | thanks | 16:04 |
| Hobbsee | Rejected: | 16:06 |
| Hobbsee | The source bip - 0.7.2-0ubuntu1 is already accepted in ubuntu/hardy and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution. You have to modify the source version and re-upload. | 16:06 |
| Hobbsee | ? | 16:06 |
| Hobbsee | i deleted it. | 16:06 |
| * Hobbsee shrugs, will test it in other ways | 16:07 | |
| ubotu | New bug: #215738 in soyuz "The message on emails for upload rejections is misleading" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215738 | 16:15 |
| ignas | cprov-out: hmm, indeed - apparently no thanks ;) even though i have reuploaded the package with -f, launchpad is not trying to rebuilt it, because it is "deleted" | 16:18 |
| ignas | cprov-out: launchpad rejected my changes because - "the version is the same" | 16:47 |
| kiko | ignas, increment the version and try again. | 16:51 |
| ignas | kiko: i can't | 16:51 |
| ignas | kiko: which is why i tried to remove the old package | 16:51 |
| ignas | "delete" it | 16:51 |
| ignas | and upload it again | 16:51 |
| ignas | it deleted the deb | 16:52 |
| kiko | ignas, you can't? fingers cramped? :) | 16:52 |
| ignas | kiko: i can't - it would take long, and i want a working deb back | 16:52 |
| cprov-out | ignas: does't really matter if you've deleted the source, soyuz check if it was ever uploaded to that PPA. | 16:52 |
| cprov-out | ignas: so, you will never be able to reupload the same version. | 16:52 |
| ignas | kiko: so i was thinking maybe there is a way to at least "rebuild" the deb again | 16:52 |
| ignas | if i can't reupload the same version | 16:53 |
| kiko | hmmm | 16:53 |
| ignas | until i get the version part resolved | 16:53 |
| ignas | because at the moment i am stuck | 16:53 |
| ignas | old version deleted, new version - not there yet | 16:53 |
| cprov-out | ignas: why did you remove it ? | 16:53 |
| ignas | cprov-out: because i assumed that if i will remove it i will be able to upload it back | 16:53 |
| ignas | again | 16:53 |
| ignas | because well - it won't be in there | 16:53 |
| cprov-out | I have to go not, but I'm sure someone else will explain to you why it's we can't allow you to upload the same version of a package with a different content. | 16:55 |
| * cprov-out goes | 16:55 | |
| ignas | emm, so unless i will manage to come up with a new version I will not have anything installable in PPA? | 16:55 |
| kiko | ignas, you can just append -rev1 to the existing version number. | 16:56 |
| ignas | kiko: packages are generated automatically | 16:57 |
| ignas | kiko: i have written only parts of that system, so i would have to find out how it works and fix it | 16:57 |
| ignas | kiko: which i will do, but it will take time | 16:57 |
| kiko | ignas, you can change them after generated, this once. | 16:57 |
| ignas | kiko: i have no idea how debian packages are generated at the moment | 16:57 |
| kiko | ignas, I'll let you read about that -- but it's not very complicated, just pick up the source package you generated and update the version | 16:58 |
| kiko | maybe LaserJock or Fujitsu might have a hint :) | 16:58 |
| ignas | kiko: so - why is the delete button in there at all? | 16:59 |
| ignas | kiko: if it only "hides" actually | 16:59 |
| ignas | and if it only "hides", why isn't there "unhide" button | 17:00 |
| kiko | it does delete the package. | 17:01 |
| kiko | it just doesn't allow you to reuse the version. | 17:01 |
| ignas | i see | 17:02 |
| ignas | ok, it makes sense, though having an undelete or "rebuild" button would be kind of nice, because - the version is locked to the particular state of the package anyway | 17:03 |
| ignas | if it is to "not allow 2 different packages under the same name + version in the world" | 17:03 |
| kiko | that I could agree with; however, if you delete and upload a new version, all bets are off. | 17:03 |
| ignas | thing, then it would kind of make sense to allow people to reupload the same package under the same version number | 17:03 |
| kiko | if you want to file a bug about undeleting deleted packages that haven't been superseded yet, we can do that | 17:04 |
| ignas | i mean - you can just keep md5/sha or something like that | 17:04 |
| ignas | kiko: if such a thing would make sense for anyone else except for me at this specific moment... | 17:04 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| ignas | hmm, i have dsc file, changes file, orig.tar.gz and diff.gz, how do i get the same sandbox i would get by using "apt-get source some-package" from these? | 17:22 |
| rockstar_ | Can someone point me to the link where I can request an svn project be converted to bzr? | 17:40 |
| rockstar_ | ...and added to launchpad... | 17:40 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| _MMA_ | I don't know if this is a Launchpad or Bazaar question. Is there a way to keep specific files automatically synced between branches? | 17:44 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| ubotu | New bug: #215798 in launchpad-bazaar "Register branch page should make it clear registration is not pre-requisite for working on a project" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215798 | 18:07 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| sque | Hi! I need some help with branch merging... I am unexperienced user of bazaar. Ok I have this branch https://code.launchpad.net/~sque/liboonet/spec2-dev and I want to merge it at this https://code.launchpad.net/~sque/liboonet/trunk. I clicked on propose for merge, it changed on "work in progress" statues, I then added to the merge queue | 18:29 |
| sque | and now? what? | 18:30 |
| sque | how the REAL merging happens? I have given all the needed info | 18:30 |
| matsubara | sque: someone with the appropriate permission need to merge your branch into the other branch | 18:32 |
| sque | I am the owner of both branches | 18:33 |
| matsubara | and push the changes to launchpad | 18:33 |
| sque | matsubara the "propose for merging" and "add in merge queue" are just informational actions? | 18:34 |
| sque | I have to pull both branches localy, merge one to the other and push it back? | 18:34 |
| matsubara | sque: AFAIK, yes | 18:34 |
| matsubara | you just need to pull the target branch locally. | 18:36 |
| matsubara | brz pull target-branch | 18:36 |
| matsubara | cd target-branch | 18:36 |
| sque | I have done that... | 18:36 |
| sque | and then? | 18:36 |
| matsubara | bzr merge url-of-proposed-merge-branch | 18:36 |
| matsubara | bzr commit -m "description of merged changes" | 18:36 |
| matsubara | bzr push | 18:36 |
| matsubara | I think that would do it | 18:37 |
| sque | so this... does nothing! https://code.launchpad.net/~sque/liboonet/trunk/+merge-queue | 18:37 |
| matsubara | well, nothing is unfair. Imagine for instance how that merge-queue helps projects which get lots of contributions. It's a single place where you can see all the proposed patches to include in mainline. | 18:39 |
| matsubara | I think that at some point this might be automated though. | 18:39 |
| matsubara | sque: you might want to ask thumper about it when he's around. | 18:39 |
| matsubara | or maybe abentley | 18:40 |
| sque | The way it is presented seems more like a real action not just an organizational place | 18:40 |
| sque | and that got confused me. If I knew from the 1st place that it was just informational I wouldn't use it on a project of 1 developer :P | 18:41 |
| sque | I would just merge the code localy and just commit it | 18:41 |
| sque | anyway ty :) | 18:42 |
| matsubara | sque: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar | 18:42 |
| matsubara | sque: that's the list of specs the launchpad-bazaar team will be working on. check the branch-merge-bot one. it seems to be what you're asking for. | 18:43 |
| sque | it was the first in the list that I clicked ;) | 18:43 |
| matsubara | sque: so the merge-queue page is the first step on that direction | 18:43 |
| sque | yes | 18:43 |
| sque | and probably you will press something like "do it" and all the queue will be processed | 18:44 |
| sque | nice :D | 18:44 |
| Zelut | I just uploaded a package to my PPA which was denied. I believe I have fixed it but the same dput command tells me 'you already uploaded that one dummy' | 19:21 |
| LaserJock | Zelut: yeah, either remove the .upload file or use dput -f | 19:21 |
| nand | hi! | 19:24 |
| Zelut | LaserJock: ok, that works.. now I realize I don't think I fixed the problem after all :) | 19:24 |
| Zelut | LaserJock: I build my package with bzr-buildpackage --native. That created .changes, .deb, .orig & .dsc. | 19:25 |
| nand | some news on the LP mailing lists since #208431 got fixed? | 19:25 |
| nand | my application is still stuck :/ | 19:25 |
| Zelut | LaserJock: I dput the .changes (after signing) and its rejected for 'containing a binary package' | 19:25 |
| LaserJock | yeah | 19:26 |
| LaserJock | you need a source-only upload | 19:26 |
| Zelut | LaserJock: ..but if I remove the .deb from the folder it complains that it can't find the .deb. | 19:26 |
| LaserJock | so look for a _source.changes file | 19:26 |
| LaserJock | rather than a _<arch>.changes | 19:26 |
| Zelut | ...which I don't have. | 19:27 |
| LaserJock | could be you need to create one | 19:27 |
| Zelut | can you tell I'm new at this :) | 19:28 |
| Zelut | ok, I think I got it.. dput the _source.changes file.. lets see how this gets accepted. | 19:32 |
| LaserJock | it's got a much better chance :-) | 19:33 |
| Zelut | I'll wrap my head around this one of these days. | 19:33 |
| Zelut | ok, this is probably another simple one but this time I got: Signer has no upload rights at all to this distribution. | 19:36 |
| LaserJock | oops | 19:37 |
| LaserJock | you uploaded to Ubuntu | 19:37 |
| LaserJock | you were ------||----- close to being a MOTU there ;-) | 19:38 |
| Zelut | i thought I'd try to squeeze it in there | 19:38 |
| LaserJock | so you just rand dput *_source.changes? | 19:38 |
| LaserJock | *ran | 19:38 |
| Zelut | I did, and I'm using the .dput.conf as suggested here: https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart | 19:39 |
| LaserJock | yeah, the problem is the default is ubuntu | 19:39 |
| LaserJock | we've discussed a little about changing the global dput config to not default to ubuntu to avoid that kind of thing | 19:40 |
| Zelut | so I should simple remove the /ubuntu/ on my incoming or..? | 19:40 |
| LaserJock | no | 19:40 |
| LaserJock | your .dput.cf file is fine | 19:41 |
| LaserJock | you just need to do dput my-ppa *_source.changes | 19:41 |
| LaserJock | where "my-ppa" is the name of the PPA in the .dput.cf you want to upload to | 19:41 |
| LaserJock | dput has a global config file in /etc/ that has an ubuntu section for developers to upload with | 19:42 |
| LaserJock | but it's set as the default | 19:42 |
| Zelut | that makes sense | 19:43 |
| Zelut | i wonder if its assumed people using PPAs already know this so it isn't mentioned on the LP link. | 19:43 |
| Zelut | ie; if you're building your own PPA archive you *probably* already know the steps so the docs are lacking. | 19:44 |
| Zelut | ok, tat one was accepted | 19:45 |
| Zelut | thank you | 19:45 |
| LaserJock | well, it is in there | 19:47 |
| LaserJock | but probably not clear enough | 19:47 |
| LaserJock | Step 3: Upload signed sources only (no binaries), using | 19:47 |
| LaserJock | dput phototeam-ppa P_V_source.changes | 19:47 |
| LaserJock | so technically that has both the "You need to upload _source.changes" part and "dput <ppa> *_source.changes" part | 19:48 |
| LaserJock | but it's not really as clear as it probably should be | 19:48 |
| ubotu | New bug: #215913 in malone "filing bug report requires account" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215913 | 21:20 |
| ubotu | New bug: #195013 in rosetta "Firefox 3 and xulrunner 1.9 needs translations" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195013 | 21:56 |
| gilir | hi | 21:58 |
| gilir | I have some problems with a PPA | 22:01 |
| gilir | The repository itself seems to be corrupted | 22:01 |
| gilir | https://launchpad.net/~awn-testing/+archive | 22:02 |
| gilir | If somenone have a good idea, I'm interesting :) | 22:03 |
| Rinchen | gilir, what do you mean by "corrupted"? I see you had some amd64 failures there | 22:22 |
| Rinchen | but other than that it looks ok to me | 22:22 |
| Rinchen | gilir, ah, I see. "Chroot problem" | 22:23 |
| Rinchen | kiko, do you know what causes the ppa builders to set the status as "Chroot problem"? | 22:24 |
| Rinchen | that's a new one for me | 22:24 |
| gilir | Rinchen people using the PPA have the same error when they do apt-get update | 22:24 |
| Rinchen | gilir, well your log states "E: Encountered a section with no Package: header" | 22:25 |
| Rinchen | do you have a depends in there by chance? | 22:26 |
| * Rinchen is not the PPA expert. :-) | 22:26 | |
| gilir | Rinchen yes I build package with depends on packages on the PPA | 22:27 |
| gilir | but I can't see which package have this Section probelm | 22:27 |
| Rinchen | yeah the logs don't seem to indicate which dependency it might be...they just issue the error | 22:29 |
| Rinchen | unfortunately gilir I don't know enough to help you beyond this point. someone else here might though. If you don't get an answer, you can file a Question on LP or email the users list | 22:31 |
| gilir | Rinchen Ok thanks :) | 22:31 |
| === Martinp24 is now known as Martinp23 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!