ubotu | New bug: #212709 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "atieventsd crashed with SIGSEGV in _XSend()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212709 | 01:01 |
---|---|---|
ubotu | New bug: #215449 in xorg (main) "Keyboard becomes unresponsive in X" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215449 | 01:31 |
tjaalton | damn atieventsd.. it should probably be disabled | 07:46 |
ubotu | New bug: #207108 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "ATI driver enabled 8.04 don't start" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207108 | 08:06 |
tjaalton | mvo: I've noticed a possible problem with x11-common and dapper->hardy upgrades.. x11-common Replaces xrgb (<= 1.0.0-0ubuntu2) but the package in dapper has an epoch, so the rule doesn't work? | 08:40 |
tjaalton | this is also bug 212672 | 08:41 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 212672 in xorg "couldn't upgrade to hardy from dapper" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212672 | 08:41 |
mvo | tjaalton: good catch, the epoch is needed | 08:41 |
tjaalton | mvo: ok, I'll add it | 08:42 |
ubotu | New bug: #215456 in update-manager (main) "Upgrade failed (dup-of: 205079)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215456 | 08:45 |
mvo | bug 215456 makes me slightly nervous, it seems to be nvidia releated | 08:51 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 215456 in update-manager "Upgrade failed (dup-of: 205079)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215456 | 08:51 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 205079 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "kubuntu Hardy Heron could not install libc6" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205079 | 08:51 |
mvo | do you know if we had tls in gutsy too? | 08:51 |
tjaalton | nvidia-glx installed the non-tls version in /usr/lib until a few weeks ago | 08:55 |
mvo | hm, ok | 08:56 |
mvo | I wonder how these people got the bug then | 08:56 |
seb128 | bug #196464 | 10:27 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 196464 in gdm "After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196464 | 10:27 |
seb128 | interesting comment | 10:27 |
seb128 | what is atieventsd and why does it .Xauthority? | 10:28 |
tjaalton | sigh | 10:28 |
seb128 | does it change | 10:28 |
tjaalton | it's some crappy daemon for multihead | 10:28 |
tjaalton | I'm all for disabling it by default | 10:30 |
tjaalton | it only generates grief from what I can tell | 10:30 |
seb128 | ok, I'll wait to see if other people have the same issue | 10:31 |
seb128 | and reassign | 10:31 |
tjaalton | ok | 10:35 |
ubotu | New bug: #215585 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "[Hardy] Complete system freeze when scrolling using fglrx" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215585 | 11:01 |
ubotu | New bug: #196464 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196464 | 11:35 |
ubotu | New bug: #206703 in kdebase (main) "[hardy] kde fail to start if keyboard native langage maps are activated (dup-of: 205979)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206703 | 13:11 |
seb128 | james_w: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215396 | 13:17 |
ubotu | Launchpad bug 215396 in gnome-control-center "gnome-display-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() [when running xgl]" [Medium,New] | 13:17 |
james_w | seb128: I'm just testing a "fix" for that. | 13:18 |
james_w | it's the same issue we solved for g-s-d and Xgl I think | 13:18 |
seb128 | james_w: ok, good ;-) | 13:18 |
james_w | however the capplet is missing a NULL check so it crashes. | 13:18 |
seb128 | scr=0x0 | 13:19 |
seb128 | indeed | 13:19 |
Q-FUNK | hm. dak@debian seems to be in limbo. got the upload ack mail more than 3 hours ago, but still no install mail. | 13:28 |
jcristau | Q-FUNK: you built with the new dpkg | 13:35 |
jcristau | Q-FUNK: and dak didn't like that until a few minutes ago | 13:35 |
Q-FUNK | oh? | 13:41 |
jcristau | see the thread on -devel | 13:41 |
Q-FUNK | ok | 13:41 |
Q-FUNK | jcristau: title of the thread? | 13:42 |
jcristau | something with dak in it | 13:43 |
Q-FUNK | Are Sha* checksums accepted by dak ? | 13:43 |
jcristau | yes | 13:44 |
Q-FUNK | ok | 13:45 |
Q-FUNK | except that I never received the rejection mail. I received the confirmation for the upload, then nothing. | 13:45 |
jcristau | the upload was probably put on hold | 13:45 |
jcristau | and reinjected after the dak fix | 13:46 |
Q-FUNK | hopefully :) | 13:47 |
Q-FUNK | thanks for the pointer, anyhow | 13:47 |
ubotu | New bug: #215584 in xserver-xorg-video-ati "compiz freeze with ATI Radeon X600" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215584 | 13:53 |
ubotu | New bug: #215702 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "Hardy: fglrx + compiz (dexktop effects) not working right" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215702 | 15:07 |
Q-FUNK | hm. still nothing from the damn buildd. | 15:50 |
ubotu | New bug: #215728 in xorg (main) "High CPU Consumption" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215728 | 15:57 |
komputes | Q-FUNK: any progress of the geode driver? | 16:12 |
Q-FUNK | komputes: yes, waiting for debian to get its package builders back into shape | 16:12 |
komputes | Q-FUNK: great, if you need me to test it I have the hardware, so just ping me when that time comes | 16:13 |
jcristau | geode isn't autobuilt, so 'package builders' have nothing to do with that... | 16:15 |
Q-FUNK | hm? | 16:16 |
Q-FUNK | the buildd have a deprecated dpkg-dev and silently reject packages that use a recent one. | 16:16 |
Q-FUNK | and whoever was supposed to re-queue packages evidently missed one | 16:17 |
jcristau | no | 16:17 |
Q-FUNK | how else do you explain this then? | 16:18 |
jcristau | i don't know why you're talking about buildds | 16:20 |
Q-FUNK | then don't say no. | 16:27 |
ubotu | New bug: #24582 in xkeyboard-config ""Back" and "Forward" buttons should work out of the box in Firefox" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24582 | 16:44 |
james_w | seb128: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6770/# | 16:48 |
james_w | do you think the message is ok? | 16:49 |
seb128 | james_w: there is already a message displayed when the capplet can't be used no? | 16:51 |
james_w | yes, there is | 16:51 |
james_w | I'm not sure exactly what the problem here is though. It has already checked that xrandr 1.2 is available | 16:52 |
james_w | but it still doesn't work, it's probably a driver bug I think | 16:52 |
seb128 | I think that's a xgl issue | 16:52 |
james_w | or Xgl in this case | 16:52 |
seb128 | the driver is likely xrandr capable | 16:52 |
seb128 | but xgl might not be | 16:52 |
seb128 | or something | 16:52 |
seb128 | james_w: about the message, why do you need a new one if we already have one? I'm concerned about translations | 16:53 |
james_w | ah yes | 16:54 |
james_w | it's just the way the code is layed out | 16:54 |
james_w | also I wasn't sure about re-using it if it's not the same problem. | 16:54 |
seb128 | what is the other problem? | 16:55 |
seb128 | and I think your message is too technical | 16:55 |
seb128 | users don't know what xrandr is | 16:55 |
seb128 | we should just display a "your graphical setup doesn't support dynamic configuration change" or similar | 16:56 |
james_w | "The X Server does not support the XRandR extension. Runtime resolution changes to the display size are not available." | 16:56 |
james_w | "The version of the XRandR extension is incompatible with this program. Runtime changes to the display size are not available." | 16:56 |
james_w | that's the two existing messages. | 16:57 |
seb128 | bah | 16:57 |
seb128 | I would use the first one | 16:57 |
james_w | ok, I'll change it | 16:58 |
seb128 | do you agree about the not breaking translations? | 16:59 |
james_w | yeah, that's important. | 16:59 |
seb128 | I don't want to dictate decisions ;-) | 16:59 |
seb128 | ok, cool | 16:59 |
ubotu | New bug: #215778 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "2.6.24-16.30 kernel update - nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215778 | 19:57 |
ubotu | New bug: #215399 in firefox-3.0 (main) "firefox beta 3 does not always display images (dup-of: 182038)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215399 | 21:26 |
ubotu | New bug: #215976 in ubuntu "nvidia driver not found with 2.6.24-16 kernel(64 bit) (dup-of: 215778)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215976 | 23:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!