[10:58] <Ng> rtg: I've been using the iwl4965 from lbm and I think there's a problem with it, but it's a bit of a puzzler. I get an oops on suspend, but we remove network modules on suspend, and removing it by hand doesn't generate an oops
[10:58] <Ng> hmm, unfortunately it doesn't seem to be in logs. I'll try and capture it with a camera or something
[10:59] <Ng> the lum iwl4965 seems fine, so it's hardly the scariest of issues :)
[15:41] <Blinny> I was told in #ubuntu+1 to mention this here:  I'm running an updated Hardy Beta right now, with 8GB RAM. Unfortunately, after a recent kernel update (to 2.6.24-16-generic) my kernel is only seeing 3GB. I had understood that Ubuntu was no longer separating 32 and 64-bit kernels, hence the -generic. I haven't found a bug report about this, but wanted to check here before filing, as I know everyone is really busy right now. Is this a known issue
[15:54] <amitk> Blinny: contents of /proc/mtrr?
[15:59] <Blinny> amitk: http://www.pastebin.ca/984739
[16:05] <amitk> Blinny: have you tried adding 'mem=8192M' to the kernel command line?
[16:10] <Blinny> amitk: Sorry it took so long - this is a hardware RAID that takes along time to initialize. kernel boot option mem=8192M  does not make a difference in total memory.
[16:11] <amitk> Blinny: I have to step out for a bit, will look at the mtrrs when I get back
[16:11] <Blinny> amitk: No worries. Cheers.
[16:13] <amitk> Blinny: please file a bug
[16:13] <Blinny> amitk: Will do.
[16:32] <Blinny> amitk: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/217309
[16:34] <Blinny> Booting into both 2.6.24-16-generic and 2.6.24-12-generic finds only 3GB RAM.  Using i386 Hardy Beta LiveCD found all 8GB. Gutsy x86_64 LiveCD found all 8GB
[16:36] <cradek> fwiw, the new x86_64 2.6.24-16-server finds all 16GB on my machine
[16:38] <Blinny> I thought i386 and x86_64 installs use the same kernel now.
[16:39] <cradek> Filename: pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.24-16-server_2.6.24-16.30_amd64.deb
[16:39] <cradek> Description: Linux kernel image for version 2.6.24 on x86/x86_64
[17:43] <cjwatson> cradek: they share the same package description, but it's a different build
[17:44] <cjwatson> -server_*_amd64.deb != -server_*_i386.deb
[20:18] <blueyed> Is /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ expected to have gone for powernow_k8 recently?
[20:21] <blueyed>  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver says "acpi_idle", for amd64 and amd64x2
[20:30] <blueyed> bug 209632
[20:30] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 209632 in linux "[Hardy] CPU freq scaling does not work anymore with the newest kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209632
[20:31] <blueyed> or rather bug 205087
[20:31] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 205087 in linux "cpufreq dirs in /sys don't show up" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205087
[21:01] <blueyed> Another bug that would be nice to have fixed: bug 210672
[21:01] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 210672 in linux "linux-image-2.6.24-13-openvz refuses to boot" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210672