=== jayc__ is now known as jayc_ === asac_ is now known as asac === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson [10:58] rtg: I've been using the iwl4965 from lbm and I think there's a problem with it, but it's a bit of a puzzler. I get an oops on suspend, but we remove network modules on suspend, and removing it by hand doesn't generate an oops [10:58] hmm, unfortunately it doesn't seem to be in logs. I'll try and capture it with a camera or something [10:59] the lum iwl4965 seems fine, so it's hardly the scariest of issues :) === jayc__ is now known as jayc_ [15:41] I was told in #ubuntu+1 to mention this here: I'm running an updated Hardy Beta right now, with 8GB RAM. Unfortunately, after a recent kernel update (to 2.6.24-16-generic) my kernel is only seeing 3GB. I had understood that Ubuntu was no longer separating 32 and 64-bit kernels, hence the -generic. I haven't found a bug report about this, but wanted to check here before filing, as I know everyone is really busy right now. Is this a known issue [15:54] Blinny: contents of /proc/mtrr? [15:59] amitk: http://www.pastebin.ca/984739 [16:05] Blinny: have you tried adding 'mem=8192M' to the kernel command line? [16:10] amitk: Sorry it took so long - this is a hardware RAID that takes along time to initialize. kernel boot option mem=8192M does not make a difference in total memory. [16:11] Blinny: I have to step out for a bit, will look at the mtrrs when I get back [16:11] amitk: No worries. Cheers. [16:13] Blinny: please file a bug [16:13] amitk: Will do. [16:32] amitk: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/217309 [16:34] Booting into both 2.6.24-16-generic and 2.6.24-12-generic finds only 3GB RAM. Using i386 Hardy Beta LiveCD found all 8GB. Gutsy x86_64 LiveCD found all 8GB [16:36] fwiw, the new x86_64 2.6.24-16-server finds all 16GB on my machine [16:38] I thought i386 and x86_64 installs use the same kernel now. [16:39] Filename: pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.24-16-server_2.6.24-16.30_amd64.deb [16:39] Description: Linux kernel image for version 2.6.24 on x86/x86_64 [17:43] cradek: they share the same package description, but it's a different build [17:44] -server_*_amd64.deb != -server_*_i386.deb [20:18] Is /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ expected to have gone for powernow_k8 recently? [20:21] /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver says "acpi_idle", for amd64 and amd64x2 [20:30] bug 209632 [20:30] Launchpad bug 209632 in linux "[Hardy] CPU freq scaling does not work anymore with the newest kernel" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209632 [20:31] or rather bug 205087 [20:31] Launchpad bug 205087 in linux "cpufreq dirs in /sys don't show up" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205087 [21:01] Another bug that would be nice to have fixed: bug 210672 [21:01] Launchpad bug 210672 in linux "linux-image-2.6.24-13-openvz refuses to boot" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210672