/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/04/16/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

greg-gbdmurray: bug 185543 which has 70 some odd duplicates, was converted into a question by a user asking a question.  But, it shouldn't be a question.00:04
ubotuLaunchpad bug 185543 in system-config-samba "system-config-samba.py crashed with SystemError in __init__()" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/18554300:04
bdmurraygreg-g: that's a new one00:05
greg-gyeah, I was confused for a second why it was a question.00:06
bdmurraylook at this "Convert back to bug"00:06
greg-goh, hah!00:07
bdmurrayThat is probably be worth documenting00:07
greg-gyeah, hmm, how should I word this00:07
greg-g"Converting back into a Bug as this issue is a bug, not a support request.  For support requests please file a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu"00:10
greg-gor something similar00:10
bdmurrayThe comment is optional and I wouldn't want to spam that many people00:11
bdmurrayIt might not notify them w/o a comment00:11
greg-gah, ok, good point00:11
bdmurrayI think the conversion process to a question and back needs some documenting though00:13
greg-gprobably00:14
bdmurraygreg-g: were you subscribed to that bug at all?  I wonder if everyone will get question and bug e-mail now.00:31
greg-gbdmurray: I wasn't.  And I decided not to subscribe since there was going to be a lot more mail most likely :)00:40
greg-gin retrospect, yes, I should have00:40
danageis it a known bug in gvfs that on ftp servers, you cannot delete entire directories including all their content?00:56
pedro_danage: that works fine for me, which ftp server are you using?00:58
pedro_is there anything on the logs of the server?00:58
danagei think filezilla00:58
danagelet me check real quick00:59
pedro_sure00:59
danageok here is what happens: "preparing delete" under file operations. it fetches the number of the files. Then: Couldn't remove the folder XYZ. under more details then: directory not empty01:00
danagei skip all01:00
danagelook inside the directory and suprise: it is empty01:00
danagei shall file a bug report01:03
danageseems like a release critical behavior01:03
danagehttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 might be related01:04
ubotuGnome bug 522933 in ftp backend "copying or deleting a directory leads to a file not available error" [Normal,Unconfirmed]01:04
pedro_is that the same error you're getting?01:04
danageno01:04
danagei should file a bug report, i think01:05
danagethis has been going on01:05
danageok i filed a bug report, #21797501:21
danagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/21797501:21
ubotuLaunchpad bug 217975 in gvfs "Cannot delete folders on FTP" [Undecided,New]01:21
lifelessis there a hidden ('.' prefixed) file in that directory?01:24
danagelifeless: let me check01:48
danagelifeless: no, empty even when i turn on "show hidden files"01:49
danageok now this is strange01:51
danagethe directory isn't empty!01:51
danagei just connected with firefox01:51
danageand it shows a couple of files in the folder01:51
danagegvfs doesn't!01:51
danage(the files don't start with .(something))01:52
danageis there some kind of directory cache?01:52
lifelessI don't know sorry01:58
saivannlifeless : I can reproduce it there too02:34
saivannnautilus does not show files with filenames that start with . , even when it is configured to show hidden files, so I can't delete the folder unless I take filezilla to delete the hidden file before.02:35
lifelesssaivann: sounds like a bug in its use of ftp02:44
saivannlifeless : I'm currently writing a detailed list of steps to reproduce the bug. Seems that nautilus is not able to access hidden files through gvfs FTP plugin..02:46
danagehmm... my files aren't even hidden and it doesn't show it02:48
saivanndanage : do you have files that does not start with . that are not shown with nautilus?02:49
danageexactly02:49
danagethey are shown with firefox though02:49
saivanndanage : Really!02:49
danageyes02:49
danageis there some sort of cache?02:50
saivannwell that's really strange02:50
danagethat i might need to wipe out02:50
danagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/21797502:50
ubotuLaunchpad bug 217975 in gvfs "Cannot show/delete hidden files or delete folders that contains hidden files on FTP" [Low,Confirmed]02:50
saivanndanage : I don't know, but you might try the "reload" button02:50
danagesame behavior02:51
saivanndanage : Ho sorry, I did not read your description correctly "do not have a . in front of them"02:51
danagethe problem might be related though02:52
saivanndanage : I though that you said "do have a . in from of them"02:52
danagei could point that out more clearly02:52
saivanndanage : maybe, can you give me a list of filenames that does not appears in your case? Just to test it02:52
lifelessFTP can hide files02:52
lifelessthere are protocol options to say list all02:53
danageyes, sec02:53
danage/Music/will be deleted soon/Ada - Blondie/02:54
danagefolder name02:54
danage02 - Ada - Cool My Fire (I'm Burning).mp302:54
danagefilename02:54
danagethis one didn't get deleted02:54
danageAND doesn't show on nautilus list02:54
danageit's not the () though, other files don't show either02:55
saivanndanage : Interesting, let me try02:55
saivanndanage : It does not show for me either02:58
saivanndanage : Remove all "-" from the filenames, does it show?03:00
danagehm i have no other ftp client03:06
saivanndanage : If it's possible for you, you can install filezilla03:06
saivannsudo apt-get install filezilla03:07
danagewill do, just a second03:07
saivanndanage : Great, thanks03:07
danagethe funny thing though is: some files in that folder had all the - - - 's03:08
danageand DID show and DID get deleted03:08
saivanndanage : Wow, really weird :P03:08
danagewill you be able to fix it?03:08
saivanndanage : Actually not me but more the bug report is detailed and clear and well reported, more developers will be able to do a great job. I aim to make this job as simple as possible and to report this to the right people so it can be fixed as fast as possible03:10
saivanndanage : Testing is always good :)03:10
danageyeah, let's narrow this one down03:10
danagein my opinion, it's release critical03:10
danagewe shoiuld probably make separate bugs out of these03:13
danage1) the hidden files03:13
danage2) tbd.03:14
saivanndanage : According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance , I believe that low is a correct priority. Anyway the priority is not the more important point, good bug description is what will really help the bug getting fixed03:15
saivanndanage : tbd? What is tbd?03:15
danage:) to be determined03:15
saivanndanage : s/low/medium/ , sorry03:15
saivannah :D03:15
saivanndanage : Finally did you try without the "-" ?03:16
danagesec03:16
saivannok03:16
danagesuspense....03:17
saivannhehe03:18
danageok removing the "0" didn't help03:18
danagedash next03:18
danageone -: nothing happens03:19
saivanndanage : You really know how to create suspense :03:19
danage2: success03:19
danageit shows now03:19
danagewtf03:19
danagestrange bug03:19
danagelet me fiddle around a bit03:19
saivanndanage : That's what I thought!! I think that I just found why some files worked while other did not, try to put a - at the beginning of the filename without spaces, in my case the file appears in nautilus03:20
danagethe file fjhdkjhkj-- shows03:20
saivanndanage : exactly03:20
danageit's the space and the -?03:20
saivanndanage : Then the problematic character is "- " or " -"03:20
danageah03:20
saivanndanage : Apparently03:20
danagefunny03:21
danagelet's narrow it down further03:21
saivanndanage : Like you suggested, can you open a new bug report for that?03:21
danagealso: does it also affect directories?03:21
danageyes i can03:21
saivanndanage : Interesting point03:21
danagewe will change the existing one to include your info onl03:21
danagey03:21
saivanndanage : No, Ada - Bloundie shows03:21
danageah you are already03:22
saivanndanage : Perhaps you can modify the description of the first bug report to speak only about the "dot" since it might be a different issue than the "- " one. I also wonder if other characters cause this kind of issues03:23
danagei just changed it- check it out03:23
danagei think it could stay like this03:23
danagenow, i will open a new report03:23
danageit might be (space) - (space)03:24
danageyes, it is not " -"03:24
saivanndanage : Yes that's fine IMO, anyway my steps are sufficient and the bug is evident so..03:24
saivanndanage : really? Thanks for finding this out03:24
danageok here is what i have: no problem are: " -", "- ", "--" and " - "03:26
danageoccurring ONCE03:26
danageWTF???03:26
danagehfds - hjkd - hgfjhkd03:26
danageworks!03:26
danagewhere is the friggin difference?03:27
saivanndanage : Yes... I'm also finding almost the same strange behavior with nouveau - fichier03:27
danaget'es fraincais`03:27
danagefrancais03:27
saivanndanage : ouep :)03:27
danage:)03:27
danagecanadien?03:27
danageparce que c'est un peu tard en france a ce moment03:28
saivanndanage : Oui, et toi Francais de France?03:28
danagenon, allemand mais j'habite en californie03:28
saivanndanage : Hehe, ici c'est presque tard03:28
saivanndanage : J'adore internet :)03:28
danageok so should i just put the original filenames that i have problems with in the bug report?03:28
danagewhoever wrote the code will prolly know much quicker03:29
saivanndanage : If you still have some time, I believe that looking at this deeper can be helpful03:29
saivanndanage : Well the actual filename is enough yes, we can add more comments later if we find interesting new stuff03:29
danageyes03:30
danagelet me know what i should do03:30
danagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21174803:30
ubotuLaunchpad bug 211748 in gvfs "gvfs can't list hidden files through ftp" [Low,Invalid]03:30
danage???03:31
saivanndanage : Well... that would really be awful if it's true, but since it works with filezilla and not nautilus, I doubt that this bug is really invalid03:33
danageme too03:33
saivanndanage : And in my case, the FTP server is ProFTPD03:34
danagetry this one: 05 - fdf - fdfsd fdfsd fdsfs.mp303:34
danageit will list!!!03:34
saivanndanage : Maybe Capital letters?03:34
danagemaybe03:34
saivanndanage : 02 - F'm Nouveau Test Test Test Test.mp3 does not work03:36
danagehm03:36
danagewtf03:36
saivanndanage : The name seems to be limited in lenght03:36
danageah03:36
danageor it's the spaces03:37
danage05 - fdf - fdfsdfdfsdfgsdfgsdfgsddsfsFdfs.mp303:37
danageworks!03:37
saivanndanage : 02 Fm test test test setse Nouveau Test Test Test Tesddt.mp3 does not works. My understanding is that it's probably more the lenght of the filename that cause the problem then the special characters, special characters only get really long when they get translated and cause the real filename to exceed the limit03:39
saivanndanage : I don't know what you think about that theory :)03:39
danagespecial characters get three digits right?03:40
danage%20 for spacew03:40
danagefor example03:40
danagei am submitting it now03:40
danagelet's see what happens03:40
danagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/21801003:40
ubotuLaunchpad bug 218010 in gvfs "Certain filenames on FTP don't list in Nautilus" [Undecided,New]03:40
saivanndanage : great, your theory is better than mine, fgdfgklsdfklgjsldfgjsldfgnjsldfkgnjsldfkgnjsldfkgnjsldfjkgndjsafgjkaseyfgksaerjfgykaerjyfjkdsjkdfjkjkjkdgjkdgdgnogslgngsrdkubgsdlrgbskljghkergt.mp3 show correctly :) Spaces might be a part of the problem03:42
=== rockstar` is now known as rockstar_
saivannTesting this bug is kind of funny03:43
danageyeah03:43
danagemake sure to add it to the description03:43
saivannand d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d.mp3 does not show!03:43
saivanndanage : I believe that our bug report will show really relevant informations :)03:44
danageand i want sebastien to fix it tomorrow!!!!!03:44
danagehahahah03:44
danageso it's not the uppercases either03:44
danageand not the "-"03:44
saivanndanage : Hehe, Sebastian is so active, that's incredible03:44
saivanndanage : Apparently not..03:45
saivanndanage : No, the real problem is : More than 7 spaces in filename does not show03:46
saivanndanage : Your guess was right03:46
danagei count >603:47
saivanndanage : Oh yes, sorry03:47
danageok03:47
danagelet me put it in description03:47
saivanndanage : Now THAT is accurate :)03:47
danagegood job03:48
saivannyes!03:48
danagenice and short03:49
danageplease confirm and set priority03:49
danageok now it's perfect03:50
saivannyep!03:50
greg-gwow, well done! :)03:51
saivannthanks for your great testing on this :)03:51
danagesure03:51
danageyou know, with open source i see it like this: if i want it to work, why don't i make it to work03:51
danageand if i can't: why don't i kindly ask someone to make it work and giving him the easiest time fixing it03:52
danageshould we mark 217975 as double of the invalid one?03:53
saivanndanage : sure, I really agree03:53
saivanndanage : I prefered to add a little notice in the bug description about it03:54
danageok03:54
saivannso Sebastian will see it at the first look03:54
danageok03:54
danagei hope we didnt spam people too much with all the changing around03:54
saivannhehe, well, my opinion is that we never have enough people fighting bugs03:55
danageyeah03:56
danagei wish i could03:56
danagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/20852403:56
ubotuLaunchpad bug 208524 in gvfs "Gvfs ftp module doesn't display file whose name is longer than 42 characters" [Medium,Triaged]03:56
danagekinda related, probably03:57
saivanndanage : I tested 42 characters and it works, looks like we have the real problem here..03:59
danageso we should probably add that to the bug report and link to ours04:00
danageu gonna take care of it?04:00
danageit might in both instances be a problem though04:00
danagetoo long04:00
danageby itself doesnt work04:01
danageand 7 spaces by itself doesn't work04:01
saivanndanage : I will comment on the upstream bug report and subscribe to all these bugs (and look if I can find other similar bugs). Also, I will report our bugs upstream04:03
danageok04:03
danagecool04:03
danagehope it gets fixed before the release04:03
saivanndanage : I really don't know how it can be hard to fix..04:03
danagehow come you can confirm bugs?04:07
danageand set priority04:07
saivanndanage : I applied to be a part of the bug control team. Anybody who demonstrate a strong devotion to bug triaging can apply. All you need to do is to seriously follow these rules https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage and to ask questions, Brian Murray is the one who approuve new members04:09
danagehm i should maybe ask him04:10
saivanndanage : Read all informations at the link that I provided to you and become a member of the bugsquad team, then once you have a couple of good bugs triaged, ask for your inclusion to the team and provide at least 5 good example of your work to Bria04:11
saivannBrain*04:12
saivanndanage : Would be great to have you in the team tought :)04:12
danage:)04:12
saivannBrian*..04:12
danageok04:13
danageeventually, i will qualify04:13
danagei lack knowledge of coding04:13
danageso most of my bugs are kinda like: i found the bug, how do i provide more info04:13
danagekinda thing04:13
saivanndanage : You actually don't need coding knowledge, but debugging knowledge, and good logic04:14
danagei can debug04:15
saivanndanage : Then maybe you can start with the bug squad and start triaging bugs, but without "super powers", then if you're confortable, you can go for the bug control team if you want04:15
danageok04:15
saivannthe bug control team needs you to really know and follow the rules, but all bug triager knows some package better than other packages. I'm very active with usplash and gnucash for an example, but there are a lot of packages scare me04:17
danagegvfs for example is something i could never understand04:17
danagebut i am highly impressed by the way they pulled it off in such a short time04:18
saivanndanage : this is indeed very impressive04:18
danagei like it a lot04:18
danagewhat they might wanna put though is a pause/resume feature04:18
danageok, i have to get back to work04:20
saivanndanage : There is similar ideas in ubuntu brainstorm, also people want file transfert queue instead of multiples transfert at once04:20
danagefun working with you04:20
danagequeue is a good idea too04:20
saivanndanage : Yes, thanks again for this great work!04:20
danagethat would be a serious advantage over mac os and windows04:21
saivannyes, really, the brainstorm is full of good ideas04:21
saivannyes... really, I voted up :)04:21
danage:)04:21
danagenot that easy to implement though: queue only makes sense if transfer is on the same channel04:21
danagei dont want a ftp transfer be queued after a hdd copy04:22
saivanndanage : That's the kind of reflection that come with improvement :D04:22
danageyou sent our two bugs upstream?04:23
saivanndanage : Yes04:24
danagecool04:24
saivanndanage : sorry if it takes time, I'll do it in the next miniutes04:24
danagereally excited now to see what they say04:24
danageall cool, i was just curious04:24
saivannI'm finding upstream bugs that really sound like our bug.. so I'll mark comments about this too04:32
danageurl?04:32
danagehah, we might have found the key to eliminate a couple of bugs04:32
danagethat would be killah04:32
danageseen upstream bug04:36
danagecool04:36
danageu can remove my "to reproduce" though04:36
danageit's in there twice nw04:37
danageyours is better04:37
saivanndanage : Where is your "to reproduce", note that I can only modify descriptions like you, comments are invincible :)04:38
danagehttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52834604:39
danagehere04:39
ubotuGnome bug 528346 in ftp backend "Files on FTP with >6 spaces in filename don't list in Nautilus" [Major,Unconfirmed]04:39
saivanndanage : ah... I did not do it correctly. we'll have to leave it like that, but at least it is well documented04:49
danageshouldnt be a problem04:50
saivannI don't think so04:50
danagelet's see what happens!!! :)04:50
saivanndanage : Yes, I hope that they will have time to fix it, but perhaps that it will be fixed as a Stable Release Update since the RC is almost there04:52
saivannWe did a very good job04:52
danage:)04:52
danagestable release update= service pack for windows?04:52
saivanndanage : Hehe, no, windows service pack changes UI and important things, SRU are bug fix and generally security fixes that are enough important to be accepted while the distribution is stable04:53
danageah04:54
saivanndanage : Once a ubuntu release pass the Release Candidate state, updates must be really tested and require to fix important things04:54
danagehm they might make an exception for gvfs since it is so new04:54
saivannbut I'm not an expert on this04:55
danagewe'll see04:55
saivannpossible, MOTUs will take the decision..04:55
bdmurraysaivann: hello04:55
saivannOr maybe that it will be backported04:55
saivannbdmurray : hi!04:55
saivannbdmurray : I hoped that I did not disturbed your activity when I said your name :)04:56
bdmurraysaivann: nope, no problem04:56
danageare you brian who is resposible for bug squad?04:57
bdmurraydanage: Yes, I am brian04:58
danagecan i apply for the bug squad?04:58
danagei dont know if my record supports an application, but i would kinda like to04:59
bdmurrayDo you mean the bug control team?  They are the ones who can set bug importance.04:59
danagesaivann: do i mean the bug control team? lol05:00
danageah ok my fault05:00
saivanndanage : You can become a bug squad member without approval https://edge.launchpad.net/~bugsquad and I suggest you to start taking experience with this team before thinking about the bug control team. You will see if you are confortable05:00
saivanndanage : That's what I did, after some time I was ready for the bug control team, and I knew that it was for me :)05:01
bdmurraysaivann: and you've been doing great work!05:02
saivannbdmurray : Thanks, it's always great to ear this, i'm working hard and never quite sure that I do "ideal" work :)05:02
danagebdmurray: you are from la?05:03
danagei live in westwood05:03
bdmurrayI'm actually in Oregon05:03
danage:(05:03
saivannAnd I'm in Canada, it's quite cold here!05:04
saivannbdmurray : If danage ask you to become a member of the bug control team after some time, just a little comment : he does very good testing and it's great to work with him05:07
bdmurraysaivann: okay, I'll remember that!  What bug were you two working on just now?05:07
lifelessftp listing bug in gvfs/nautilus05:08
danageBug #217975 and #21801005:08
ubotuLaunchpad bug 217975 in gvfs "Cannot show/delete hidden files or delete folders that contains hidden files on FTP" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21797505:08
ubotuLaunchpad bug 218010 in gvfs "Files on FTP with >6 spaces in filename don't list in Nautilus" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21801005:08
saivannhere they are05:08
saivannIt tooks a good amount of time to find exactly what was the problem, and we might have finally found the real cause of some upstream bugs05:11
danagesaivann: you know what though05:16
danagefor me, the hidden files/not hidden files thing works05:16
danagei just renamed a file to .lshglkhdflj05:17
saivanndanage : does .lshglkhdflj show in nautilus this time?05:18
danageyes05:18
danagetry it yourself05:18
danagewe might have mislead ourselves on that one05:18
danagei tried again just now, just to make sure05:19
danageand it worked05:19
saivanndanage : Well from my side, it still does not work, even after multiple re-try. If you click on the reload button, is it still here?05:20
danageyes05:21
danagethen, there is a bug05:21
saivanndanage : The hidden file problem might be more complex than we think. The problem now happens for me with filezilla, it worked perfectly and multiple times before. This would maybe mean that the problem is on the server side like described in duplicate bug 211748, but that would be very strange since it's two different FTP servers.05:27
ubotuLaunchpad bug 211748 in gvfs "gvfs can't list hidden files through ftp (dup-of: 217975)" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21174805:27
ubotuLaunchpad bug 217975 in gvfs "Cannot show/delete hidden files or delete folders that contains hidden files on FTP" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21797505:27
danageyes, really strange05:27
danagedo you have a server log?05:28
saivanndanage : That's a good idea, looking..05:28
danagealso: my ftp server is a filezilla server too05:28
danagerunning under windows05:28
danagemy linux filezilla is the one from the ubuntu repo05:28
saivanndanage : My fileserver is a FTPdPro, and my client is filezilla05:28
bdmurrayAren't there some public anonymous ftp servers out there still too?05:29
danagegood idea, we should try those. do you know any with write access=?05:29
bdmurrayI was thinking more about the spcaes bug05:30
saivannI don't have logs, that the FTP server of my website05:30
danagesaivann: i have the same problem. my brother is hosting it on a windows virtual machine05:30
saivannbdmurray : What were you thinking about the spaces bug?05:33
saivannanonymous ftp sites : http://www.ftp-sites.org/anonymous_ftp_sites_list_com_1.html05:34
bdmurrayJust that having a public ftp server for anyone to see it at might be helpful.05:34
saivannWe can use my FTP server, ftp://leservicetechnique.com/ username: brother password: ubuntu05:36
saivanndanage : You know what? I believe that concerning hidden files bug, we were wrong, the server is the problem. I had the illusion that filezilla was able to list the hidden files just because filezilla remember the files that he created by himself, but otherwise forcing filezilla to list the directory make all files starting with a . disappears. The only way to show the files is to use "Server / force showing hidden files"05:40
saivanndanage : At least, the major part of the problem is the server. However, unless it can lead to bad directory listing or other problems, I still believe that nautilus should be able to show these files like filezilla even when there hidden by the server since apparently a lot of servers hide files05:42
saivannbut the problem about spaces is really a nautilus bug05:43
saivanns/nautilus/gvfs05:43
danagesaivann: ok, even better05:45
danageyou could add that information to the bug report05:45
danageand pull it05:45
danageso that other people who might want to report the same bug05:45
danagewill find ours, and refrain from reporting a new one05:46
saivanndanage : I'm doing this right now, also I will set the priority to low since a part of the problem is caused by the server and not gvfs itself05:49
saivanndanage : Great, thanks for finding this out! Bug updated05:59
danageyes and thanks for improving this05:59
saivann;)05:59
danageubuntu = getting better and better05:59
saivannI agree to this :)06:00
danageit is coming REALLY close to being a real alternative to windows, even for the average user06:00
danagei am never going back to windows06:00
saivanndanage : Actually, I can do pretty more things with linux ubuntu than any other systems! Each time I repair a computer or try to restore a corrupted Hard Drive, I use linux06:01
danageyeah me too06:01
danagesame thing06:01
saivannAnd I have a lot of customers that use linux06:01
saivannhehe :)06:01
danagealso, the workflow is getting much better06:02
danagethumbnails on desktop, these kinds of things06:02
danagegvfs is also part of this process in my opinion06:02
danagei don't know much about backends06:02
danagebut on the front end, it's much of an improvement06:02
danagenice description. sums it up pretty well06:03
saivanndanage : Yes, ubuntu is just unlimited :)06:03
saivanndanage : thanks, I think that it will do the trick06:03
danageshould06:03
=== Caesar_ is now known as Caesar
saivannWell, great job.. I'm going to sleep now, good night every one06:17
saivanndanage : Nice to work with you06:17
danagegood night06:19
danageit was fun, see you around06:19
* saivann sleepzzzz06:19
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== SinTux is now known as Syntux
affluxmorning08:16
DOOM_NXGood Morning :)08:29
affluxgah. another report where upstream devs thought they can just change the ubuntu task :(08:35
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
seb128afflux: is that wrong?08:37
afflux(set to fix commited, no wonder it won't be fixed in ubuntu)08:37
seb128the desktop team usually use fix commited when the bug is fixed upstream so that doesn't seem to be an issue08:37
affluxhuh08:37
affluxI was thinking fix committed is for "the fix is available in ubuntu somewhere", propably uploaded to the archives but not yet built, or a VCS-managed package or something08:38
affluxI thought that's what upstream tasks are for.08:38
seb128that's how launchpad means it I think, but that's not how it's used for desktop bugs for example08:39
affluxhm08:39
=== doko_ is now known as doko
affluxomg. Didn't we have a discussion on people "I can confirm this too"ing in LP bugs recently? Now that the bug is fixed, they say "I can confirm that this bug is fixed in version xyz" :/09:52
Arbymvo: you might be interested to know that dapper->hardy on kubuntu went without a hitch10:37
Arbyusing the gtk upgrader as you said10:38
Arbythis was in a VM with a completely clean dapper install10:38
Arbyfully up to date10:38
mvoArby: great!10:39
mvoArby: happy to hear that :)10:39
Arbyyeah I was impressed10:39
Arbyeven if it is the simplest possible test case10:39
Arbymo while you're around, bug 21690710:43
ubotuLaunchpad bug 216907 in update-manager "update-manager does not accept debian proxies" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21690710:43
Arbymvo: ^^10:43
ArbyI'm not even sure if what he's trying to do is supposed to be possible10:43
mvoArby: let me look10:49
mvoArby: yeah, that is a use-case we do not support very well, I will look into it and see what I can do about it10:50
Arbywill you comment on the bug?10:50
mvoyes10:50
Arbythanks10:50
=== _Czessi is now known as Czessi
mvoArby: I replied, I would like to test his setup, I think with a internal mirror (and no network for the client to the outside) and the altnerative CD the upgrade should go just fine, but I would like to run a test on this just to be sure11:07
Arbymvo: if you can explain how to set up a mirror I can try and test this evening.11:18
Arby(am at work now)11:18
Mezbug #21777212:18
ubotuBug 217772 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/217772 is private12:18
=== warp10_ is now known as warp10
IulianHey13:07
pedro_hello Iulian13:08
IulianHiya pedro13:09
mvoArby: thanks, that sounds interessting, we could try something together. I think apt-proxy is sufficient for the test, lets talk later13:18
smallfoot-hardy is on 8 days, please hurry up and fix the pink shadows & window decoration bug in the nvidia-utils drivers package14:51
qensewhat's the bug number?14:52
smallfoot-there are many dupes for it14:52
smallfoot-https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/19485114:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 194851 in compiz "Pink shadows with Compiz (dup-of: 186382)" [Low,New]14:52
smallfoot-https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/18638214:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 186382 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "[nvidia 169.xx] gtk window decorator somtimes draws decoration ugly or not at all" [Low,Confirmed]14:52
smallfoot-https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/19493314:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 194933 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "Compiz + 169-series NVIDIA drivers: frequent visual corruption of window title bars upon various title bar events (dup-of: 186382)" [Undecided,New]14:52
smallfoot-https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24/+bug/19543614:52
ubotuLaunchpad bug 195436 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "Compiz - no shadows (dup-of: 186382)" [Medium,Confirmed]14:52
smallfoot-Ubuntu & ArchLinux users experience this bug, but installing the official drivers from nvidia.com removes this bug14:53
qenseone master report is enough :)14:53
smallfoot-the bug seem to be in the packaging of the drivers, and specificly nvidia-utils14:53
smallfoot-there is a thread about it here too http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=10954614:54
smallfoot-and discussion here http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=35310114:54
qenseare those threads mentioned in the bug report?14:54
smallfoot-not sure14:54
qensethere isn't much else that can be done14:55
qensewe just need to wait for someone to pick up the bug and start working on it14:55
smallfoot-well there is like many bug reports about it, you must fix the bug14:55
qensethat's the way  things go in opensource development14:55
smallfoot-yeah, it needs to be repackaged better14:55
qenseyou could try to fix it :) see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU for more information14:55
smallfoot-because the official drivers work when you install them from nvidia.com, but when you get them from apt-get it got that pink bug14:55
smallfoot-i've never fixed anything14:56
qensethis could be your first :)14:56
smallfoot-:)14:56
bddebianBoo16:00
qensehello bddebian16:02
bddebianHello qense16:03
IulianHey bddebian16:10
bddebianHello Iulian16:12
=== elmargol_ is now known as elmargol
=== bigon` is now known as bigon
danagesaivann: you here?16:33
saivanndanage : Hi!16:33
danagehi16:33
saivanndanage : (a bit busy on the phone though)16:35
saivanndanage : As you can see, we finally triaged a existing bug that had a wrong description, I updated the launchpad and upstream bugs to contain te result of our tests16:37
danagecool, but someone else gets our props!!!! :)16:37
saivannI believe that the more important is that the bug get reviewed by developers. I'm surprised that our bug as been set as the duplicate one but that's probably because developers already knew the older one.16:45
danageyeah, i was just kidding16:47
danagemost importantly the bug needs fixed, the rest i somewhat care less about16:48
greg-gdang you pedro_! ;)  I just reported that bug upstream also!16:54
greg-gwe were doing it simultaneously16:54
pedro_greg-g: evince one?16:54
greg-gyeah16:54
greg-g:)16:54
pedro_greg-g: I'll mark mine as dup of yours, dont worry :-)16:54
greg-ghaha, mine does have more info :)16:55
greg-ghttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52843016:55
ubotuGnome bug 528430 in general "Displays "-1" as first page" [Normal,Unconfirmed]16:55
pedro_greg-g: change the watcher in the meantime :-)16:55
greg-ggot it16:56
pedro_done16:56
greg-gcool.  you're too quick sometimes ;)16:57
pedro_hehe sorry about it16:58
greg-gI haven't finished my first cup of coffee yet though, that is my excuse16:58
pedro_and thanks for let me know :-)16:58
greg-gdon't be16:58
=== Mez is now known as fishfinder
=== fishfinder is now known as Mez
Tuv0k!ubotu17:06
ubotuI am ubotu, all-knowing infobot. You can browse my brain at http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi - Usage info: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBots17:06
saivanndanage : ;)17:07
bigondoes anybody has troubles to print something that is send to an other cups server?17:13
=== mvo_ is now known as mvo
=== ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara
mvoArby: bug #186465 might be a local customization problem, I suspect that for some reason /usr/bin/sudo is not set suid root20:23
ubotuLaunchpad bug 186465 in update-manager ""distribution upgrade" hangs during update to hardy" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/18646520:23
mvoArby: at least for the person that provided the strace20:23
Arbymvo: how would I un-suid /usr/bin/sudo to test that20:27
Arbysome kind of chmod foo?20:27
mvoArby: chmod 755 /usr/bin/sudo - but keep a root shell open somewhere so that you can change it back20:29
Arbyit's a VM, if I break I'll just make a new one20:30
Arbysnapshots++20:30
mvoheh :) fair enough20:30
Arbyjust finishing an install test then I'll give it a go20:31
mvoArby: the gutsy2hardy cdrom upgrade seems to work for me (at least on a stock install) - did you use the altnerative CD for the test?20:31
Arbymvo: I used the alternative CD from yesterday and the DVD from today20:32
* mvo checks with the dvd20:32
ArbyI wonder what's wrong with that VM then, hmm20:33
ArbyI got the same result with both so it suggests it could be my test system20:33
mvoor some different setup maybe, its a bit odd20:33
ArbyI have today's alternate CD here. I'll try that too20:35
=== raboof_ is now known as raboof
=== seb128__ is now known as seb128
=== Tuv0k is now known as darthanubis
=== darthanubis is now known as Tuv0k

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!