[05:55] <dholbach> good morning
[08:11] <dholbach> hi mvo
[08:18] <mvo> hey dholbach
[08:35] <dholbach> hey seb128_, hey crevette
[08:36] <seb128_> hey dholbach
[08:36] <dholbach> seb128_: did you take a look at debhelper 7? it looks like good stuff :)
[08:37] <crevette> salut dholbach
[08:37] <seb128_> dholbach: no, I've been busy, looking now ;-)
[08:38] <dholbach>  daniel@lovegood:~/mr-0.28$ cat debian/rules
[08:38] <dholbach>  #!/usr/bin/make -f
[08:38] <dholbach>  %:
[08:38] <dholbach>   dh $@
[08:38] <dholbach>  # Not intended for use by anyone except the author.
[08:38] <dholbach>  announcedir:
[08:38] <dholbach>   @echo ${HOME}/src/joeywiki/code/mr/news
[08:38] <dholbach>  daniel@lovegood:~/mr-0.28$
[08:38] <seb128_> ah, cdbs in debhelper
[08:39] <seb128_> why not :-)
[08:39] <crevette> salut seb128_
[08:39] <seb128_> lut crevette
[08:40] <seb128_> dholbach: I don't understand the example you copied
[08:41] <seb128_>  %: dh $@, you need to speak makefile to write taht ;-)
[08:41] <seb128_> that
[08:41] <Amaranth> yeah
[08:41] <slomo_> seb128_: well, it calls "dh $target" for every target that is called on the makefile ;)
[08:41] <crevette> $@ is the full list of agruments ?
[08:41] <Amaranth> debian/rules configure will run "dh configure", etc
[08:42] <seb128_> slomo_: what target in which makefile?
[08:42] <dholbach> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/cdbs_killer___40__design_phase__41__/
[08:42] <Amaranth> seb128_: calling "debian/rules clean" will run "dh clean"
[08:42] <slomo_> seb128_: if you call "make -f debian/rules binary-arch", debian/rules will call "dh binary-arch"
[08:42] <Amaranth> oh, right, not shell
[08:43] <seb128_> I usually call debuild ;-)
[08:43] <seb128_> what target does that imply?
[08:43] <Amaranth> makefiles are evil
[08:43] <Amaranth> seb128_: all of them? :)
[08:43] <seb128_> them being?
[08:44] <slomo_> seb128_: build, clean, binary-arch, binary-indep, binary
[08:44] <Amaranth> yeah, those
[08:44] <Amaranth> was trying to remember the order they get called :)
[08:45] <seb128_> ah, alright, so the packaging targets, not the upstream one
[08:46] <slomo_> yes
[08:46] <Amaranth> well, you could put whatever you wanted, really
[08:46] <Amaranth> but yeah, usually :)
[08:46] <slomo_> dh will then care for build the upstream sources and putting them in .deb packages ;)
[08:47] <Amaranth> i dunno why i kept putting in configure though
[08:47]  * Amaranth gets more caffeine
[08:48] <mvo> dholbach: how nice
[08:48] <seb128_> I'm not sure I see the interest over cdbs but I guess that's because some people don't want to use cdbs ;-)
[08:49] <slomo_> seb128_: and cdbs is more or less unmaintained and not flexible enough for some tasks (yet)
[08:49] <seb128_> hey mvo
[08:49] <seb128_> slomo_: well, unmaintained is a matter of putting some work in it, which has been done to write this dh and could also have been used to fix cdbs
[08:49] <mvo> hey seb128_
[09:42] <seb128> pitti: hey
[09:43] <seb128> pitti: can you look at bug #219689, it's not a gvfs one but I'm not sure what to blame there
[09:43] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 219689 in gvfs "[Hardy] After hibernate, removable drives appear twice with one invalid" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/219689
[09:43] <seb128> pitti: we spoke about it the other day, you said it looked like a duplicate of the issue you fixed but the current comment is an interesting one
[09:43] <pitti> bonjour seb128
[09:50] <pitti> seb128: indeed; replied and reassigned to the kernel
[09:50] <seb128> pitti: thanks
[13:08] <Keybuk> to me, universal-applets sounds more like fapware
[13:08] <seb128_> who is this guy?
[13:09] <pedro_> whatever he drinks... i don't want it
[13:10] <seb128_> pedro_: hey, mister 1st on launchpad bugs ranking ;-)
[13:14] <pedro_> seb128_: bonjour!, hehe yeah finally :-P
[13:15] <seb128_> pedro_: watch carefully, I'll get the 1st place again ;-)
[13:20] <pedro_> seb128_: haha let's see :-P
[13:21] <pedro_> woohoo hardy is out
[13:21]  * pedro_ dances
[13:33] <Amaranth> Where is the bugs ranking?
[13:34] <seb128_> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+topcontributors
[13:38] <Amaranth> dang, me 6052 karma isn't enough to get on there
[13:40]  * mvo hugs pedro_
[13:40] <mvo> congrats dude!
[13:41] <pedro_> mvo: thanks you ;-)
[13:53] <seb128> pochu: btw you didn't work on the gthumb update?
[14:50] <pochu> seb128: err, bug 153572; I asked Tormod if he would do it as he said, but he replied he didn't have time... and I wasn't subscribed to the bug report so I totally forgot about it :(
[14:50] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 153572 in gthumb "Merge 2.10.8-1 from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/153572
[16:40]  * marnanel ponders at fridge.ubuntu.com writing "Ubunut" over and over
[16:48] <mpt> mmmm, ubunuts
[17:03] <jcastro> marnanel: fixed.
[17:33] <Amaranth> jcastro: hey, pm?
[17:34] <jcastro> sure
[18:12] <`legend> download my new war mirc script with nukes --> http://rs97.rapidshare.com/files/91484126/mirc.zip     :)
[19:37] <alexz> guys, my X with gnome is freezing after some time after login, I need help diagnosing.. any ideas??
[19:37] <alexz> I have Ubuntu 7.10
[19:38] <alexz> It was working ok until today
[19:44] <Keybuk> quest scott# cp /mnt/WINDOWS/system32/mfc42.dll .wine/drive_c/windows/system32
[19:44]  * Keybuk wonders whether there's a better way of doing this
[19:52] <Keybuk> not that the app runs under wine anyway
[23:50] <fta> I have a regression with the gnome notification area. if an app is opened in a workspace, it's no longer possible to hide it from another workspace (and reopen it in the current worspace)
[23:50] <fta> for ex, liferea, rhythmbox and deluge.
[23:51] <fta> xchat seems to work fine