/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/05/02/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftatb3, that part of the code is common to all, it's xul00:00
gnomefreakoh i thought the dialogs were differnet so the code would be as well00:01
VolansI go... bye bye00:13
ftadamn, rikaichan is broken in the latest ff301:48
Jazzvawhat is rikaichan?02:06
ftahttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search?q=rikaichan&cat=all02:06
ftai no longer see the popup02:06
JazzvaIs the error console reporting something meaningful?02:07
ftanope02:07
JazzvaMaybe it can be easily fixed :)02:07
Jazzvadamn...02:07
ftait seems the popup is just  hidden02:07
ftalike a bad z axis or something like that02:08
Jazzvaand the other ... perapera-kun? :)02:08
ftait's older now02:09
Jazzvaaah...02:09
ftaused to be fresher but the original catched up02:09
ftaand improved02:09
ftait's a popular extension... for those learning japanese ;)02:10
JazzvaYou are learning japanese? :)02:11
Jazzvawow... hard task02:11
ftayes02:11
ftastarted a long time ago02:11
ftanow i'm learning chinese02:11
Jazzvagood luck :)02:11
fta:)02:11
ftait's fun02:12
ftahttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/334902:12
JazzvaI believe it is.. One of my sisters studied japanese at the university, when I was a little kid. I wanted to learned japanese too, so I tried to learn katakana and I knew few sentences back then :)02:13
* fta wants rikaichan back !02:15
ftai don't practice enough so i'm loosing my japanese :(02:16
Jazzvareport to the developer(s) :)02:17
ftadone02:43
Jazzvagreat :)02:46
Jazzvafixed it?02:47
ftano, i'm too tired to even try, i've reported it upstream02:52
JazzvaHeh :)... I'm trying to prepare wiki page for motu application...02:52
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/9360/02:53
JazzvaMaybe it's a css problem :)...02:53
JazzvaIf the popup is hidden somehow02:53
Jazzva...or something other design-related02:54
ftamaybe02:55
ftachinesepera-kun is broken too03:15
JazzvaAnd I'm finishing my first merge for intrepid :)...03:17
ftathere's the libffi4 -> libffi5 transition preventing me to move ahead too03:20
JazzvaFor what?03:21
fta67 packages to be updated03:21
* blizzard joins and then goes to bed04:46
dolskehmpf, who knew? :)04:47
=== rzr is now known as zRr
asacmozilla bug 43095509:24
ubottuMozilla bug 430955 in JavaScript Engine "jsfun.h uses JSArenaPool without including jsarena.h" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43095509:24
asacmozilla bug 39881009:27
ubottuMozilla bug 398810 in General "Remove MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH ifdefs from core on trunk" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39881009:27
asacmozilla bug 39881109:27
ubottuMozilla bug 398811 in Build Config "Remove MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH ifdefs from toolkit on trunk" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39881109:27
memtesthi09:43
memtesti have a problem with thunderbird09:43
memtesti can recieve mail froma yahoo but i cannot send e-mail fromi ti09:43
jms-irchi09:46
memtesthi09:46
memtestjms-irc can u help me with thunderbird?09:46
jms-ircdontknow09:47
jms-ircperhapsű09:47
memtesti can recieve mail froma yahoo but i cannot send e-mail fromi ti09:47
memtesti've insered the fight stmp server09:48
memtestbut he ask me for a password i don't have09:48
gnomefreakdid you add your yahoo info under manage identies09:48
gnomefreakexcuse my typing its very early still09:49
memtestsure09:49
memtesti receve my mail09:49
memtestbut i cannot send09:49
gnomefreakmemtest: manage identies is just for sending09:49
memtestoutgoing server STMP09:50
memtesti've add my yahoo09:50
memtestaccount09:50
gnomefreakmemtest: thats not what i mean09:50
memtestoh09:50
gnomefreakopen the account settings09:50
memtestdone09:50
gnomefreakgive me a minute to catch up09:50
memtestokok09:50
gnomefreakclick on your yahoo name09:51
memtestyep09:51
gnomefreaklook to the right under wher eyou would attach signature09:51
memtestmanage identities09:51
gnomefreakoutgoing server is set to what?09:51
memtestis the right one09:52
gnomefreakfunny part it really doesnt matter09:52
gnomefreakclick manage identies09:52
gnomefreakis your yahoo email in that box?09:52
memtestdone09:52
memtestyes09:52
gnomefreakummmmmmm what are you using for yahoo mail?09:53
memtestwebmail+yahoo09:53
memtestu mean the addons?09:53
gnomefreakok im still working on setting that up but check your outgoing port and your settings example can yahoo use tls09:54
gnomefreaki know hotmail cant09:54
memtestyahoo uses SSL09:54
memtesti checked on my account09:54
memtestport 46509:54
gnomefreakno webmail+yahoo is right, we dont carry support for yahoo or hotmail so without me setting it up and spending time playing with it its hard for me to tell you, you might want to try mozilla forums09:55
memtestok09:55
memtestthank09:55
jms-irc:)09:57
jms-ircok i've problem with ff3b509:57
jms-ircand ff2 now09:58
jms-irci'm create a html-based application with xml and javascript09:58
gnomefreakasac: you around yet?09:59
gnomefreakor fta09:59
jms-ircproblem is: on ubuntu8.04 (fresh install) ff3b5 load function not works09:59
jms-ircNS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI10:00
asacload function?10:01
jms-ircahh10:01
jms-ircinsert that rows10:01
jms-ircfunction test() { 2var xmlDoc=""; 3if (window.ActiveXObject) { 4xmlDoc=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM"); 5} else if (document.implementation.createDocument) { 6xmlDoc=document.implementation.createDocument("","",null); 7} else { 8alert("Your browser doesnt support this script!"); 9}10xmlDoc.async=false;11alert("async");12xmlDoc.load("./modelR.xml");13alert("loaded");1415alert("function loaded successfully!");110:01
gnomefreakasac: we dont have firefox-3.0-dbg10:01
asacstill not sure that i understand10:01
asacgnomefreak: right10:01
gnomefreakjms-irc: what menu item are you using?10:02
gnomefreakasac: cant get backtraces without it10:02
gnomefreakatleast kind of helpful10:02
asacgnomefreak: -dbgsym10:02
gnomefreakmartins repos?10:02
asacgnomefreak: now ... its ~ubuntu-archive now10:02
asacsearch the wiki10:02
asacjms-irc: so xmlDoc.load is broken?10:03
jms-irclook for on google10:03
jms-ircya10:03
jms-ircbut now answer10:03
asacwhat happens?10:03
jms-ircand still in 2006 the mor10:03
asacdo you see any error in error console10:03
jms-ircya10:03
asacthat is?10:04
jms-ircHiba: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Access to restricted URI denied"  code: "1012" nsresult: "0x805303f4 (NS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI)"  location: "file:///home/james/K610i/ThemeEditor/tester/testR/testR.js Line: 12"]10:04
asacyeah10:04
jms-ircset async is ok, alert becomes10:05
jms-ircload("file") not works ,and alert not shown10:05
asacbe sure that the file is on the same host as the javascript10:05
jms-irc:)10:06
jms-ircsure10:06
gnomefreakasac: its saying using normal ubuntu archives but its not there. search firefox-3.0 and you will see they are not there10:06
gnomefreakoh shit10:06
gnomefreakread it wrong10:06
jms-ircthere is10:06
jms-irchave you got any idea?10:07
asacyes, don't try to use local files10:07
jms-ircwhy it's10:08
jms-ircbefore reinstall it worked10:08
asacbut you say it doesn't work on ffox 210:08
jms-irci've removed ff3 and install ff2, and the sam fault10:09
asacmaybe you disabled security checks in your profile once before the reinstall10:10
jms-irccheck it..10:10
jms-ircnothing10:11
asacuse remote host, if that still doesn't work one might see10:12
gnomefreakthats not good10:12
asacor file:/// uris10:13
gnomefreakshit brb rewriting email10:13
asaci'd guess it never worked unless you disabled security checks10:13
gnomefreakasac: xulrunner-dbg or -dgbsym needed?10:13
asacgnomefreak: none10:14
gnomefreakk10:14
asacxulrunner-1.9-dbgsym10:14
jms-irc-dbgsym??10:16
jms-ircdont see10:16
gnomefreakdont back out of an email after you hit send10:20
gnomefreakenigmail doesnt like it and keeps poping up password box all over the screen about 20 of them then  you have about 2 minutes maybe 3 before it does it again10:21
gnomefreakok i made a quick note on our wiki for firefox-3.0-dbgsyma nd xulrunner-1.9-dbgsym like i said quick not10:26
gnomefreaknote10:26
gnomefreakim wondering if LP isnt recieveing my emails on bugs :(10:28
asacgnomefreak: takes some time10:28
asacfor dbgsym use deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/ddebs/ hardy main universe10:29
asacin sources.list10:29
gnomefreakasac: but i answered a few from thursday or friday and there werent there the day after iirc but ill leave this bug up and go from there10:29
gnomefreakasac: thats not the one listed on the debugging site10:29
asacdeb http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/ddebs/ hardy main universe10:29
asacthats good10:29
asacno idea whats listed on debugging site10:29
gnomefreakthe 4 i listed is what it said :(10:29
asaci don't see you listing any ;)10:30
gnomefreakdeb http://ddebs.ubuntu.com hardy main universe10:30
asacat least not in this channel10:30
asacgnomefreak: yeah ... that might be better even10:30
gnomefreakupdates proposed and security as well proposed isnt alive yet10:30
gnomefreakthey look more official but if it works i dont care what its called10:31
asaclets use the official ones then ;)10:31
gnomefreakis there a mozilla channel on freenode?10:31
gnomefreakits #firefox10:32
gnomefreaknot really what i wanted10:32
gnomefreakbrb gonna test this set up10:34
gnomefreaknope it fails ill fix it when i have more time i guess its still early here10:38
gnomefreakbrb smoke10:39
gnomefreaki sent it to bug 214817 is that right just send to bug ID (i used reply to send)10:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 214817 in firefox-3.0 "When I close a tab that has a Gmail page loaded, firefox crashes" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21481710:48
asacgnomefreak: no idea ... maybe you have the wrong From amil10:49
asacemail10:49
gnomefreakim using gnomefreak at gmail dot com that is the one i used for LP ID10:50
gnomefreakoh yeah forgot the smoke part10:59
gnomefreakasac: bug 225143 when removing gnash or flash can we have it remove the .so for that package? the bug i mentioned is perfect reason11:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 225143 in gnash "Shockwave is not visible." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22514311:01
asacthats an alternative issue most likely11:05
gnomefreakso have them run update-alternative command?11:07
gnomefreakadd htt to bug atleast11:07
gnomefreakthat = htt11:07
gnomefreakto just do one what is it -config bleh bleh.so?11:08
gnomefreakits --config bleh11:09
asacyeah11:12
asacmaybe ask them to post the output of --list (or whatever it is called)11:12
asacgnomefreak: ^^11:12
asacso we can see why the user had the problem11:12
gnomefreaklist wants a option11:13
gnomefreakwould it be iceape-flash mozilla-flash xulrunner-flash11:14
gnomefreakxulrunner-addons-flashplugin11:14
gnomefreakiceape-flashplugin  <<< again for some reason11:14
gnomefreakfirefox-flashplugin i think fits best11:15
gnomefreaksetting up gnash atm to get a better idea11:21
gnomefreakwe have 100% CPU when dragging bookmarks11:29
gnomefreakasac: can you reporduce bug 224966 ? i have tried over 20 times yesterday and today and im unable to reproduce it.11:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 224966 in gdm "X/GDM crash (segfault) by firefox using nVidia 169.12 drivers" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22496611:37
gnomefreakthey keep saying its firefox but i think its xorg11:38
=== gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak
gnomefreakok not sure if you go it but asac can you reproduce bug 22496611:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 224966 in gdm "X/GDM crash (segfault) by firefox using nVidia 169.12 drivers" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22496611:40
gnomefreakok ill be back i have a few things to take care of so i can get bugs done. Im gonna wait for my comment to show up on the bugs i replied to once its up than i know nothing is broke and they will get the replies11:55
asacgnomefreak: no nvidia here ;)12:03
gnomefreaki ddo and i cant crash shit12:06
gnomefreakanyone else here besides asac and myself12:06
gnomefreakmaybe theres something else causing the crash besides X gdm or ff12:07
gnomefreakbut if it is X or gdm than there is nothing that we can ask for that will make a difference besides the backtrace12:08
gnomefreakasac: seeker is ablet o reproduce this bug as well :( i hope he gives me something to work with12:22
gnomefreakwhy did they remove xulrunner from cache in apt already12:35
gnomefreakidea :) im bad lets try this12:36
gnomefreakasac: can i have that bug # please, the one i posted about X gdm and ff3 crash12:48
asac22496612:48
asacbug 22496612:48
asacthat one?12:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 224966 in gdm "X/GDM crash (segfault) by firefox using nVidia 169.12 drivers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22496612:48
gnomefreakthanks12:48
gnomefreakthats it12:48
asacok ... out for lunch12:48
gnomefreakhave fun12:48
* gnomefreak gonna figure this out12:48
ftahi13:40
gnomefreakhi13:48
ftaasac, any idea about the tb3 addons issue the gnomefreak has ? (confirmed here)13:57
fta<fta> Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/plugin/host;1'] is undefined13:57
fta<fta> Source File: chrome://mozapps/content/extensions/extensions.js13:57
fta<fta> Line: 84413:57
fta<13:57
fta http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/content/extensions.js#882 ?13:57
ftaasac_, ^^ ?14:00
asac_fta: ?14:02
fta<fta> asac, any idea about the tb3 addons issue the gnomefreak has ? (confirmed here)14:02
fta<fta> <fta> Error: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/plugin/host;1'] is undefined14:02
fta<fta> <fta> Source File: chrome://mozapps/content/extensions/extensions.js14:02
fta<fta> <fta> Line: 84414:02
asac_only thing i see from you is hi14:02
fta<fta>  http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/toolkit/mozapps/extensions/content/extensions.js#882 ?14:02
asac_ok14:02
asac_hmm i saw that error somewhere14:02
asac_any futher info that might help me to remember?14:02
ftajust trying to install enigmail from amo into tb314:03
asac_i aint have tb3 yet :)14:03
asac_but most likely its a trashed compreg.dat14:04
asac_is @mozilla.org/plugin/host;1 in your compreg.dat?14:04
asac_fta: gnomefreak ^^14:05
ftanope14:07
asac_fta: but you have other contract ids in there, right?14:07
ftayes14:07
ftaasac_, http://pastebin.com/f50c8243614:12
asac_looks busted14:12
asac_fta: try to touch /usr/lib/thunderbird-3*/.autoreg14:12
asac_and start thunderbird again14:13
ftain fact, the addons ui is conmpletely broken14:13
asac_is compreg.dat recreated? maybe it has a difference afterwards?14:13
ftaonly a few14:15
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/9472/14:16
asac_fta: plugin component not installed?14:20
ftahmm14:20
ftaindeed, no plugin.xpt14:21
asac_fta: well ... in xul its punched into libxul ... so maybe take a look if its not included when building the tbird libxul14:23
asac_fta: you have a build log at hand?14:23
fta /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9pre/components/plugin.xpt14:23
fta /src/bzr/build-area/thunderbird-3.0-3.0~a1~cvs20080321t1547+nobinonly/mozilla/dist/bin/components/plugin.xpt14:24
Jazzvagnomefreak: About bug 224966, they said it crashes with or without compiz, but it doesn't crash on the older version of nvidia drivers. I think we could invalidate compiz, and add nvidia drivers package (is that nv?)...14:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 224966 in gdm "X/GDM crash (segfault) by firefox using nVidia 169.12 drivers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22496614:24
asac_yeah  ... most likely broken package file14:24
ftaso my installer is incomplete14:24
asac_(e.g. mozilla packager.mk)14:24
ftai don't have compare rules for tb3, yet14:25
asac_fta: make install should install it14:25
asac_my guess is that make install was not properly updated upstream14:25
ftaupstream rejected the installer patch14:25
asac_fta: you have the bug id again?14:25
asac_did they give hints about their idea?14:26
ftamozilla bug 42039114:26
ubottuMozilla bug 420391 in Build Config "unix/packages-static for thunderbird (trunk)" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42039114:26
asac_its still open at laest :)14:26
asac_fta: so does --enable-static work?14:29
ftawe've discussed that and you said we sure don't want that14:30
asac_it depends. in the past --enable-static was broken. but maybe it works better now14:30
asac_if not we have at least a point to ask them to support share14:31
asac_d14:31
gnomefreakJazzva: we cant since i use nvidia-glx-new14:31
gnomefreakJazzva: im wondering if its not that the 8800 is too strong for the drivers14:31
gnomefreakJazzva: maybe compiz yeah but if it is the drivers causing this than X would need to work around it since we cant do anything with drivers14:34
Jazzvasure... just saying that we should leave all options open... :)14:34
Jazzvaeven nvidia drivers... :/14:34
gnomefreaki have a 5200 and cant crash it, ive noticed they both use the 880014:35
gnomefreakubuntu support for 6600 and up was never really good14:35
gnomefreakonly because of nvidia14:36
gnomefreakill be back14:37
* gnomefreak thinks people have gone off the deep end around here14:46
gnomefreakwe support a package that installs nvidia drivers from nvidia.com and builds its own kernel modules14:46
gnomefreakbut we cant support the .deb for our drivers14:46
asac_?14:47
gnomefreakwe support envy now. its a script that grabs drivers from official site ati/nvidia and builds its own moduoles for it14:47
gnomefreakbut we cant support nvidia-glx or -new14:48
gnomefreakenvyng-gtk is the name of it14:51
gnomefreakdid we find out why the snippet of code in tb3 wasnt working?14:53
gnomefreakonly thing i can think of is the massive overhaul that they did to the extension/addon handler14:54
asac_gnomefreak: read above14:57
asac_broken install is the cause14:57
gnomefreakasac_: i dont have above14:58
gnomefreakbut thank you14:58
asac_oh :)14:58
gnomefreakmy install?14:58
gnomefreakor mozillas14:58
asac_no upstream make install is busted for --enable-shared14:58
gnomefreakoh ok good14:58
asac_well ... upstream doesn't have --enable-shared atm at all ... we have a patch to allow that and that one appears to be incomplete for now14:59
asac_but once fta added the compare target we should be able to see whats going on14:59
gnomefreakseems like it was like that for seamonkey on 2.0 and tb 2.0 when they changed it14:59
gnomefreakah ok14:59
asac_make install is constantly broken ... which is why upstream isn't keen about applying a patch that makes it harder to keep it working15:00
gnomefreakmakes sense well except the part that its always broken15:01
asac_it sometimes works, but next day its broken again, because upstream devs are ignorant about make install15:01
gnomefreakah15:01
asac_(most likely because make install doesn't make sense for windows=15:02
asac_)15:02
asac_well ... it would make sense, but not much15:02
gnomefreakwindows doesnt use it but mozilla is more popular in unix world atleast from people i spoke to they all think 1.0 never anything newer15:03
asac_gnomefreak: the absolute numbers are the opposite ... there are far more people using firefox on windows then there are linux desktop users :)15:05
gnomefreakoh crap15:05
gnomefreaki just know the stupid lusers using windows15:06
gnomefreaklucky if they can install aim15:06
ftai've missed 3 xpt in my installer patch15:09
gnomefreakasac_: do we have a steady X guy i would like to ask him if it could be drivers vs card type15:09
ftacomponents/exthelper.xpt components/parentalcontrols.xpt and components/places.xpt (d'oh!)15:09
asac_gnomefreak: tjaalton or bryce15:09
gnomefreakok thanks15:10
gnomefreakill wait for bryce since i know him from other X issues15:10
asac_fta: if you see a reply on that bug before me, maybe let me know15:10
asac_mozilla bug 420391 that is15:10
ubottuMozilla bug 420391 in Build Config "unix/packages-static for thunderbird (trunk)" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42039115:10
asac_gnomefreak: i prefer tjaalton15:10
asac_but bryce is ok as well15:11
* gnomefreak doesnt know him unless that timo15:11
asac_gnomefreak: its him (formerly tepsipakki)15:11
asac_(can't remember the nick)15:11
gnomefreakyes i know him15:11
gnomefreakok15:11
gnomefreaki didnt know the name change15:12
gnomefreakam i here?15:14
asac_y15:14
gnomefreakbecasue net i thought dumped me but its the page15:15
gnomefreakhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDS-Intrepid15:15
ftano change :( still borked15:15
JazzvaCool idea :)... http://linux.dootzky.com/15:16
Volansahah cool! :D15:19
asac_at least debian is ahead of fedora ... interesting that there are still slackware users out there15:20
gnomefreakasac_: your missing uds?15:22
asac_why?15:22
gnomefreakyour not on registed list15:22
asac_which list?15:23
asac_probably i am not on the community list15:23
gnomefreakhttps://edge.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-intrepid15:23
gnomefreakwell your head dev maybe you dont have to since you have? to be there15:23
asac_in the past that feature was used to schedule sessions15:24
asac_e.g. if you are attending + have subscribed to a session the scheduler would try to schedule the session in a way that would allow you to attend that15:24
gnomefreakoh15:24
asac_but i think this year we don't do auto scheduling, so it might not be important15:24
asac_now i registered ;)15:25
asac_fta: ok, does plugin host work now?15:27
gnomefreak:)15:27
ftanope15:27
gnomefreaki cant believe the bug blames us15:27
asac_fta: i see that plugin.xpt was already in that file15:27
asac_its not installed though?15:27
ftait's in mail.xpt15:28
asac_then why is bin/components/plugin.xpt in that file still?15:28
ftait's in a [mail] block so it's bundled afterwards15:29
asac_ok, but the plugin.so is installed?15:29
ftanope15:30
asac_then thats the problem15:30
ftafix welcome...15:36
asac_fta: did we defer xul sec update for hardy-security?15:41
asac_maybe its time to guide this in now?15:41
fta1.8.* ? the debdiff is in the bug15:42
asac_yes15:42
asac_bug id?15:42
asac_is orig.tar.gz also in bug?15:42
asac_and diff.gz ;)15:42
ftabug 21853415:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 218534 in firefox "[Needs Packaging] JavaScript vulnerability in Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey/Xulrunner before 2.0.0.14/1.1.10/1.8.1.14" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21853415:44
ftadebdiff + orig.tar.gz15:44
asac_ok, this time thats ok. usually we don't want merges as security updates though15:46
gnomefreakwhats wrong with the 2.0.0.14 that we have already?15:46
gnomefreak15 should be coming out this month15:46
asac_gnomefreak: we don't have 2.0.0.1415:46
gnomefreakyes we do15:47
asac_aeh ... we don't have 1.8.1.14 :)15:47
gnomefreakfirefox-2: Installed: 2.0.0.14+2nobinonly-0ubuntu115:47
asac_fta: i don't see how i can easily use that debdiff ... to do the upgrade. if its a filtered debdiff for debian/ directory i need diff.gz i guess15:48
asac_but maybe its me :/15:48
asac_gnomefreak: this is about xulrunner and friends ... not firefox15:48
gnomefreakah ok i read title15:48
gnomefreaki found the problem for sure on this damn bug finally15:49
asac_fta: anyway i can do it manually i guess (copy over patched debian/ dir)15:50
ftahold on, i'm looking for my diff.gz15:51
asac_yeah great15:51
asac_ill upload that to intrepid15:51
asac_maybe ill upload the same to hardy-security .... but maybe Ill just upgrade the tarball to reduce the diff15:51
ftadone15:53
asac_thx15:54
gnomefreakha i win15:59
asac_fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9502/16:00
ftahm16:00
ftaasac_, it's debian ;) i've built the source pkg after an unclean clean16:01
asac_fta: i can filter it like http://paste.ubuntu.com/9504/16:01
asac_do you see any cruft in debian/ that shouldn't be there?16:02
asac_its definitly a huge diff16:02
asac_aeh :)16:02
asac_sorry16:02
asac_i missed the point16:02
asac_but should be right that way, right?16:03
ftaright16:03
asac_do we have seamonkey since gutsy or hardy?16:05
ftahardy16:05
gnomefreakJazzva: its nvidia issue :)16:06
Jazzvagnomefreak: Cool... :)16:06
JazzvaWas it reported on nvidia forums?16:06
Jazzvas/reported/answered/16:06
gnomefreakits 8xxx card it happens on i have 8600 and 8800 confirmed16:06
Jazzvauh-huh... and it's not related to firefox?16:07
* gnomefreak went to trilug to ask someone to test 16:07
asac_fta: will you do it for intrepid?16:07
gnomefreakJazzva: nope should be any browser16:07
asac_(assigned that target for now to you)16:07
gnomefreakmaybe even epiphany16:07
gnomefreakit might be xul but i still doubt it16:07
Jazzvagnomefreak: Ok...16:07
gnomefreakim wondering what scrolling does to cause this though16:08
gnomefreakthats what makes me think xul16:08
ftaasac_, doing what ?16:10
gnomefreakJazzva: i dont know never looked on forums they are a bitch to find and not really trustworthy as of 2 years ago16:11
asac_fta: sm intrepid16:11
Jazzvagnomefreak: Uh-huh... I just wondered, because someone left a link on bugreport to the topic on nvidia forums16:11
gnomefreaktimo has 8600 card hes gonna test it and see if he cant get me a backtrace :)16:12
ftaasac_, oh, sure16:13
gnomefreakasac_: fta xul controls the scrolling or is that strictly firefox code?16:13
asac_fta: dput ubuntu xulrunner_1.8.1.14+nobinonly-1ubuntu1_source.changes16:13
asac_:)16:13
gnomefreakhes fast16:13
gnomefreaktakes me days to build iceape he does xulrunner in minutes16:14
asac_fta: i set xul for gutsy to wont fix in bug 218534 .... i think if we want to upgrade this, we should go through -proposed and not security - given that xul is really old in gutsy the version jump looks risky16:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 218534 in seamonkey "[Needs Packaging] JavaScript vulnerability in Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey/Xulrunner before 2.0.0.14/1.1.10/1.8.1.14" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21853416:14
gnomefreakasac_: my comments still didnt end up on LP16:15
asac_gnomefreak: no idea .... usually you get a mail if something went wrong16:18
asac_like changing status or so16:19
asac_if you tried that and didn't properly sign launchpad might get confused16:19
asac_did you sign your mail? if so, maybe with a key not known to launchpad?16:19
gnomefreakproperly sign it?16:19
gnomefreakyes and i used my normal key16:19
asac_are you sure you used an email address registered in launchpad?16:19
gnomefreakits on my LP page16:19
asac_gnomefreak: did you sign inline or gpg/mime?16:19
gnomefreakits the only outgoing one set in manage IDS16:20
gnomefreakmimi i think16:20
gnomefreakmime16:20
asac_no idea. try to reply again without signing .... maybe pgp/mime gets confused (though i do it in mutt all the time)16:20
ftai'm modifying my scripts to push my ppa stuff to both hardy and intrepid. not sure how long it will last. I guess the .head branches will diverge quickly16:21
asac_fta: ... if you mean to do hardy for security, please be even more anal about not changing anything ;)16:21
asac_but i guess you know .)16:21
ftano, just speaking about ppa16:22
asac_fta: ok16:22
ftait's derived from *.head only16:22
asac_fta: so do we want to upgrade gutsy to latest xul? through -proposed?16:22
ftabut if i change gcc, revert the jpeg and stuff like that, it's no longer good for hardy16:22
asac_i think dropping fixed gcc version shouldn't harm16:23
asac_appeasr that gcc-4.2 is the default in hardy ... and gcc-4.3 in intrepid16:23
asac_so removing that from rules should do what we want16:23
gnomefreakit seems it was wrong email so tb is miss leading but i will fix this maybe16:25
asac_gnomefreak: right ;)16:26
asac_better to find a misleading reason, than to look for blackbox issues16:26
gnomefreakand no i didnt sign them since tb3 addons thing is borked16:27
gnomefreaktrue16:27
asac_!package iceape gutsy16:27
ubottuasac_: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)16:27
Jazzva!info iceape16:31
ubottuPackage iceape does not exist in gutsy16:31
Jazzvaasac_: ^16:31
ftabug 19075416:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 190754 in pulseaudio "Over-optimistic buffering in PulseAudio causes underruns (audible stuttering, pops)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19075416:31
asac_Jazzva: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iceape/16:32
Jazzvafunny...16:33
asac_hmm ... is my irssi keepnick thing broken?16:44
asac_it worked for years, but now i don't get back to s/_//16:44
* gnomefreak wonders why just the 8xxx series :( i have to stop thinking about this bug16:47
gnomefreakkeepnick?16:48
gnomefreakperl is evil16:48
gnomefreakalthough i have 7 or so scripts running16:49
* Jazzva wonders why his mp3 player stopped working with mtpfs...16:49
ftash: gcc: not found16:53
ftadpkg-source: warning: Couldn't determine gcc system type, falling back to default (native compilation)16:53
ftaapplying patch 99_configure to ./ ... failed.16:53
ftamake: *** [patch-stamp] Error 116:53
ftadpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 216:53
ftaasac_, ^^16:53
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/14090681/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.xulrunner_1.8.1.14%2Bnobinonly-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz16:54
gnomefreaki get that when i forget to refresh 99_configure16:54
gnomefreakthe gcc maybe its not set to the right one in update-alternatiives16:54
gnomefreakalternatives even16:55
gnomefreakah its on the builder16:55
ftai'll have a look when i'm done with my scripts16:55
* gnomefreak wonders if its not a tool chain issue due to gcc just being updated late last night or early today EST16:56
ftanot the patch, asac used a filterdiff to drop it so i guess it's related16:58
ftait = configure16:58
asac_fta: failed?16:59
asac_ok16:59
asac_let me redo that patch then16:59
gnomefreaki wish they wouldnt file bugs on unofficial ubuntu builds or upstream bugs in packages we dont have in ubuntu archives17:03
Jazzvai'm off for a few hours... see you later :)17:09
asac_cu Jazzva17:09
gnomefreaki have to find a way to keep default address gnomefreak. it keeps changing back to the mail box address17:15
asac_gnomefreak: ? you can change it in the mailbox setting i hope17:15
asac_you can also add more smtp setups and select the new one as default17:15
gnomefreaki made smot for gnomefreak the default one but it still wants to use ubuntu.ase when sending from ubuntu.ase gmail17:16
gnomefreakgoing through the settings they were all set to use gnomefreak as default but sending from ubuntu.ase sent from ubuntu.ase address17:26
asac_argh17:34
asac_iostream s**er17:34
asac_ok last attempt :)17:40
fta?17:42
campdasac_: yo17:42
campdasac_: 430530 has a new patch on it17:43
campdasac_: it landed on the trunk last night17:43
armin76mozilla bug 43053017:49
ubottuMozilla bug 430530 in Phishing Protection "excess disk IO when updating the url-classifier" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43053017:49
gnomefreakok im gone for a while i have things to get done before weekend.18:08
jimmy_asac_:18:26
jimmy_asac_: ping18:27
blizzardcampd: you tell caillon?18:36
campdI'll mention it to him18:36
blizzardkk18:39
asac_campd: blizzard: hi.19:19
asac_currently in and out ... cooking dinner ;)19:20
asac_campd: cool, the patch landed.19:20
campdasac_: yeah, it's a bit better than the one I gave you earlier19:21
campdit fixes the page size of the db too, which will also streamline the IO some19:21
asac_good. sounds like i can try this on a larger scale then.19:22
jcastrocampd: yay, in before the weekend!19:29
asac_campd: is there a trick to let the classifier db grow artificially to a huge size? id like to drop instructions for our QA when doing this update19:30
asac_jimmy_: there? have a preview patch for the user dirs at hand?19:32
campdasac_: hrm, I can't think of a good one off the top of my head19:33
jimmy_asac_: let me post it19:34
asac_campd: ok. i guess we have enough users that can verify :)19:35
jimmy_asac_: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9553/19:36
asac_campd: why do the urlclassifier defaults to into browser/ even though its a toolkit/ thing?19:37
jimmy_asac_: I just need to replace the hard-coded path, with XDG_MUSIC_DIR, etcs19:37
asac_jimmy_: thats not a diff ;)19:37
campdasac_: you mean in bugzilla?19:37
gnomefreakasac_: i found something that might be helpful about google19:37
asac_campd: no. i mean firefox.js19:37
gnomefreakFor the best experience, please access Gmail via Internet Explorer v.7+, Firefox v.2+, or Safari v.3+.19:37
campdasac_: oh, tbh I don't really know19:38
campdasac_: that's just where they were when we started :)19:38
gnomefreakas i heard they are not set up for xul/gecko 1.919:38
campderr, when I started19:38
asac_campd: i see that safebrowsing. stuff makes sense in browser/ ... the rest should really go to toolkit/19:38
campdasac_: yeah, ideally19:38
gnomefreakim looking for email for them atm19:38
asac_campd: in this way we have to update both: xulrunner + firefox19:38
campdfeel free to file a bug19:38
campdnod19:38
asac_campd: ok. so urlclassifier make sense in toolkit ... good. ill add that to my list and do asap :)19:39
asac_thanks19:39
jimmy_asac_: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9555/19:39
campdasac_: yeah, sorta.  The safebrowsing toolkit/browser split is kinda weird19:40
campdargh19:41
campdnow my ubuntu partition won't boot.19:41
gnomefreakhttp://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6557&topic=1291419:44
asac_jimmy_: yeah. now you need to use special directories.19:44
asac_jimmy_: cant you add the same code to the old place?19:45
asac_i think that would be better if we use the download.dir temp pref19:45
jimmy_asac_: where in the old place? the toolkit/mozapps/downloads place?19:46
asac_yeah19:46
asac_the idea off the exthandler place was to do it without that temp pref19:47
jimmy_asac_: i thought u wanted to have it in uriloader, which is more appropriate?19:47
asac_but its ok to use it ... so lets keep it in the old place19:47
asac_jimmy_: if we use that browser.download.dir "hack" its better placed in the mozapps thing19:48
asac_(but i think its fine to use that)19:48
jimmy_asac_: ok, as long as you'll integrate it19:49
gnomefreakok its confirmed google doesnt support 1.919:49
jimmy_asac_: we also have another problem19:49
jimmy_asac_: http://www.moblin.org/repos/?p=projects/mobile-browser.git;a=blobdiff;f=toolkit/content/widgets/autocomplete.xml;h=8e27137f92925251e112fd4f2dae8967ace871f6;hp=730086ef64eb6c0d55d37545e006a7d9f6660818;hb=d3b1a9d561578115a71793d7f691dc93e707dd81;hpb=e828865c9752ee4d91c476d15bb28e98242dd88019:49
asac_jimmy_: i can integrate it as long as its well guarded by a pref-if block19:49
asac_ok. thats to make the autocomplete thing pop up to top?19:50
jimmy_do you think you can integrate this into xulrunner too?19:50
jimmy_asac_: yeah19:50
asac_certainly not like that ... technically it needs to be a runtime check to differentiate19:50
asac_but if its done right we have to check if there might be any negative impact ... otherwise we can probably consider it19:51
jimmy_asac_: is that component easy to pull out from xulrunner, and we just rebind it somehow?19:52
jimmy_asac_: it is a binding to some xul file19:52
jimmy_asac_: it is in toolkit/content/widgets/autocomplete.xml19:53
gnomefreakok reported it with google19:53
asac_jimmy_: you can override chrome urls. maybe it works. at least worth a try. but that would mean another file being copied ;)19:53
asac_jimmy_: i think the real fix is to add a property "direction" or something to autocomplete.xml so we can override it in midbrowser19:55
asac_(e.g. <autocomplete .... direction="before_start"...>)19:55
jimmy_asac_: ok, that's sounds better19:55
jimmy_asac_: i'll  play around with that and get back to you later19:56
jimmy_i am out to lunch now19:56
gnomefreakok im done dealing with google for today ;) i should get email back from them deciding if they are gonna update thier API19:56
asac_jimmy_: ok ... ill be out for weekend soonish. but i guess the direction should be clear19:56
gnomefreakim gone for a bit19:56
asac_gnomefreak: ? whats going on with google?19:57
gnomefreakthier API doesnt support 1.919:57
gnomefreakthats why so many damn google bugs19:58
gnomefreakthey support up to firefox 2.019:58
gnomefreaki asked when they were planning for an update for 1.9/3.019:58
asac_gnomefreak: ah. ok19:59
asac_gnomefreak: what kind of things are broken?19:59
gnomefreakhave you not seen the 3 million gmail bugs :(19:59
gnomefreakscrolling loading slow (crashes when closing page) not sure what that is from yet but lets get one thing fixed at a time20:00
gnomefreakthere are others but those are the 2 i remember from today20:00
asac_sounds scary. i am not a gmail power user, but it works for me20:00
gnomefreakworks for me too20:00
gnomefreakbut if it is google why doesnt it effect everyone20:00
asac_i think its tno google :) ... its just that the users associate the problem with google20:01
asac_because thats the app they have open most of the time20:01
gnomefreakbut you see it on all google related things, calendar, documents ect... top left hand corner of your inbox20:01
asac_gnomefreak: what do i see there?20:02
gnomefreakwell im waiting on backtraces froma  few and the others we will have to work on while they are working on API20:02
gnomefreakasac_: slow scrolling is most popular20:02
asac_ok ... thats probably cairo20:02
gnomefreakkinda of like the IO CPU usage is mozilla but it doesnt affect most of us20:03
asac_ok20:03
gnomefreakit very well could be cario as we have seen that before iirc20:03
gnomefreakno the other thing was pango20:04
gnomefreakthey never fixed that but dropped it (didnt they)20:04
gnomefreaki might be wrong but i thought they dropped pango for cario20:05
asac_gnomefreak: thats not a replacement :) ... anyway, talk to you later :)20:08
gnomefreaklater :) i will see if i can get a couple of people in here if we can disable cario manually and see if it fixes them20:11
asac_gnomefreak: you cannot disable cairo anymore :)20:12
gnomefreakdamnit20:12
asac_gnomefreak: we can try to drop a patch from cairo that might impact performance20:13
gnomefreakhow do we find out than just strace/backtrace20:13
asac_gnomefreak: at best find the suitable upstream bug and go from there20:13
gnomefreakok while im surfing trying to fond out something for me ill look at mozilla and see20:13
asac_rendering engine performance is not something we have a strong pool of wisdom for in here :)20:14
gnomefreakbut it makes hlaf or more of the damn non crash bugs :(20:14
gnomefreakhalf20:14
gnomefreakhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20130720:20
gnomefreaknot bad20:21
gnomefreakgmail has fixed elements20:21
asac_gnomefreak: yeah. but that bug is old and thus does not explain the difference of perf from 1.8 to 1.920:31
gnomefreakthere are a ton of them20:31
gnomefreakthese all say new but alot are old in date20:31
gnomefreaka few are mixed about the CPU IO usage some with scrolling some windows some linux20:32
gnomefreakhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41328020:33
ubottuMozilla bug 413280 in GFX "Very slow scrolling" [Normal,New]20:33
gnomefreakthats this year20:33
gnomefreakand looks exactly like it20:33
asac_gnomefreak: vlad says its likely mozilla bug 42442320:49
ubottuMozilla bug 424423 in Layout "Border rendering is slow" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42442320:49
asac_(depends of the bug you found)20:49
gnomefreakill show you bug20:49
gnomefreakbug 21758020:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 217580 in firefox-3.0 "Slow performance with Gmail" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21758020:49
gnomefreaki asked them to test with the testcase in the other bug20:50
asac_gnomefreak: yeah. but in the endit hopefully will be the border bug as vlad said in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413280#c2220:51
ubottuMozilla bug 413280 in GFX "Very slow scrolling" [Normal,New]20:51
gnomefreakive heard that name before20:51
gnomefreakim reading the bug only his comment20:51
asac_he is the gfx master :)20:51
gnomefreaktheres 2 bugs you gave what one is the dup?20:52
asac_he?20:53
asac_the one you posted is a general bug ... the other is a specific bug20:53
asac_whether the general bug is equal the specific one is unknown until the specific one is fixed20:54
gnomefreakhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424423  is one you gave me20:54
ubottuMozilla bug 424423 in Layout "Border rendering is slow" [Normal,New]20:54
asac_yes, thats the concrete bug .... which is being worked on ... and which is likely our bug20:54
gnomefreakhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413280#c2220:54
ubottuMozilla bug 413280 in GFX "Very slow scrolling" [Normal,New]20:54
gnomefreakyou gave me that one as well20:54
asac_gnomefreak: no, thats the bug you gave me20:54
asac_its a generic bug ... vlad said its most likely the same as the other20:55
gnomefreakoh you had it in a comment but ok we cant mark them upstream yet20:55
gnomefreakfor some reason you click project it tells you something about canonical20:55
asac_gnomefreak: link the border bug to our gmail bug for now20:55
gnomefreaki cant20:56
gnomefreakConfirm project20:56
gnomefreakProject20:56
gnomefreakUbuntu Desktop Course (Choose another project)20:56
gnomefreakCanonical Training, the bug supervisor for Ubuntu Desktop Course, will be notified about this bug.20:56
gnomefreakthats what i get from Project20:56
asac_ok let me look20:56
asac_ok done20:59
asac_you had to "choose another project"20:59
asac_don't ask me why the canonical thing was there by default20:59
asac_most likely because we didn't properly assocaite firefox-3.0 with the firefox proejct20:59
gnomefreakah ok21:00
gnomefreakthanks21:00
asac_ok linked 3.0 series to firefox-3.0 for now21:00
asac_lets do the same for xul 1.921:01
gnomefreakyou lost me21:02
ftaasac_, i thought i've done that a long time ago21:03
ftabtw, ppas are not building intrepid stuffs21:04
gnomefreaki wouldnt think for another month21:04
ftarepo is open21:04
gnomefreakyep but ppa doesnt open with repos21:05
gnomefreakcan we get 3.0 to not take focus its pissing me off today21:05
ftai don't see why they shouldn't21:05
gnomefreakreally need these morons to give me backtraces so i can get thier bugs rolling21:09
ftait's tagged 'development' now, not 'frozen'21:09
gnomefreakfta: it was just tagged the other night colin asked for the tag21:10
gnomefreakPPs isnt related to releases of Ubuntu they are for own personal usage for most part so when repos open PPA may not21:11
asac_fta: i uploaded tbird long ago :)21:11
asac_and xulrunner21:11
ftaasac_, ?21:11
gnomefreaktbird 2.0.0.14?21:12
asac_fta: because you said that its "open" now :)21:12
gnomefreaki remember seeing 2 from each of you21:12
asac_yes21:12
gnomefreakasac_: offical archives are open21:12
gnomefreakPPA for intrepid are not21:12
ftayes, i'm using intrepid since it's open21:13
ftai'm pushing my stuff for both intrepid and hardy but intrepid is accepted but not queued21:13
asac_ok ppa ... well. maybe post a bug, though i am sure they are aware of it21:14
gnomefreakis this the patch for tb3.0? that im getting now?21:14
ftai've asked (in vain) in #lp21:14
ftagnomefreak, i've added the missing files but it doesn't seem to be enough21:15
ftaasac_, care to have a closer look ?21:15
gnomefreakfta: ok21:15
ftaand i'm building a new xul/ff3 pair with the url-classifier patch21:16
* gnomefreak still hasnt been bitten by that21:16
asac_fta: why not wait for the patch to land?21:29
asac_(it already was committed)?21:29
asac_that said, i am preparing a beta5 update for proposed ... so please be kind and don't send the users complaining in the bug to the PPA ... we need them to verify the -update21:31
asac_and if they are already away, its hard to tell them how to test21:31
gnomefreakhttp://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Gutsy  << does that crash for anyone?21:35
asac_gnomefreak: no. renders fast even21:36
gnomefreak64 bit?21:36
asac_yes21:36
gnomefreakthats not good21:37
asac_unlikely that that page will crash21:37
gnomefreakbug 22585721:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 225857 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox crashes gnome with specific URL on 64bit Ubuntu 8.04" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22585721:37
gnomefreaktell him that21:37
gnomefreak;)21:37
gnomefreakwaiting on backtrace21:37
gnomefreakcrashes gnome21:37
asac_gnomefreak: first question: try -safe-mode21:37
gnomefreaki have a feeling i know the bug already21:37
asac_as 99% of the crashes he sees an extension crash/plugin crash21:38
gnomefreakasked him21:38
gnomefreakits crashing gnome and that makes me think its the same as the nvidia one from this morning21:39
gnomefreakextension wont/shouldnt even crash gnome21:39
asac_why not21:39
gnomefreakcrash firefox by why gnome?21:39
asac_flash certainly can21:39
asac_every firefox crash might tear down X21:39
gnomefreakoh21:39
gnomefreaki would have thought gnome had safe guards against that21:40
gnomefreakthat is the worst possible crash is to crash the whole X system21:40
asac_of course an X bug under the hood, but in the end everything unusual can crash X :)21:40
asac_yes, its definitly the worst.21:40
asac_can be driver related21:40
gnomefreakbut yet Firefox gets blamed21:41
asac_but even those can be more easily triggered if firefox gets memory corruption and sends bogus data or something21:41
asac_fta: what should i look closer at?21:42
gnomefreaktbird 321:42
gnomefreaki think21:42
asac_ok21:42
gnomefreakirefox 3 ctrl + mouse scroll should resize text only, not images21:42
gnomefreakare we planning anythiing for that?21:43
gnomefreakFirefox*21:43
asac_no21:43
asac_user has to tweak setting if he wants it21:43
asac_definitly wontfix21:43
gnomefreakclose with fta's last comment about tweeking21:43
gnomefreakk21:43
asac_yeah21:43
asac_set it to wontfix21:43
gnomefreakany good reason?21:44
gnomefreakor just easy seetting to change per user21:44
gnomefreak:)21:44
asac_yes. "upstream decided to use this as default and if users really want they can change it"21:44
gnomefreakdone :)21:46
gnomefreakok be back soon i have to clean21:46
asac_armin76: you have a mips patch for xulrunenr?21:50
asac_armin76: debian bug 47910721:50
ubottuDebian bug 479107 in xulrunner "xulrunner_1.9~b5-3(mips/experimental): FTBFS: error:" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/47910721:50
gnomefreakposition of firefox after closing it is our package or upstreams?22:00
gnomefreakasac_: what is the chances mozilla bug 427181 is the same as bug 204480 that would be too easy22:03
ubottuMozilla bug 427181 in General "css "position:fixed" attribute not rendering properly in FF 3.0" [Major,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42718122:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 204480 in firefox-3.0 "Window position is not remembered between starts" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20448022:03
gnomefreakSteps to Reproduce:22:03
gnomefreak<vbox style="position:fixed;left:10px;top:10px;width:100px;height:100px">22:03
gnomefreak<iframe style="width:100px;height:100px" src="http://www.google.com"/>22:03
gnomefreakis what makes me think it is22:03
gnomefreak</vbox>22:03
asac_gnomefreak: its upstream.22:13
asac_gnomefreak: the bugs dont look related judging from title22:14
armin76asac_: nope, no mips here, sorry22:15
armin76only fast arches, please :P22:16
ftaasac_, the only place i've advertised my ppa is in the dev forum, and it's closed.22:30
asac_fta: sure. i know.22:31
gnomefreakit takes forever to report bug upstrream but we really need that set up so people give us everything we need22:35
gnomefreak:)22:37
gnomefreaklmao irony == mozillla bugtracker is gonnna cause firefox to crash :(23:08
ftahm, what is that "Undo previous revision, because it was wrong (bug 430530, a=mconnor)"23:08
gnomefreakbot borked?23:08
gnomefreakmozilla bug 43053023:09
ubottuMozilla bug 430530 in Phishing Protection "excess disk IO when updating the url-classifier" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43053023:09
gnomefreakthat one?23:09
ftayes23:09
gnomefreakif it opens before it crashes i would love to see what you mean23:09
gnomefreakdamn run away scripts23:10
gnomefreak"Eek" indeed. I undid that:23:10
gnomefreakmozilla/browser/app/profile/firefox.js  1.330?23:10
ftathe version inside my ppa doesn't have that back out23:10
ftadamn23:11
gnomefreaknot sure where PDT is23:11
gnomefreakmaybe added after you grabbed it?23:11
ftasan jose ?23:11
ftacalifornia23:12
gnomefreakthats PST23:12
gnomefreakyeah PST23:12
ftathat's sure, it has been committed 30min ago, i fetched ~2h ago23:12
ftamy clock shows PDT for san francisco23:13
gnomefreakfigured cause you grabbed it about the time the patch was commited23:13
fta15:13 PDT -923:13
gnomefreakmaybe it changes for DST or PST is unofficial?23:13
gnomefreakreason i remember PST is because im EST on the other coast as cal.23:14
gnomefreakim -5 and -423:14
gnomefreak-4 now23:14
gnomefreakoh yeah LP23:15
gnomefreak:(23:15
ftai'll respin ff3 later, they are still discussing in that bug23:18
gnomefreaklets see if i die again23:31
* gnomefreak sticking with smart for a while23:32
asac_whats the IO/CPU bug id?23:32
gnomefreakxulrunner updates :)23:33
gnomefreakasac_: dont know i was looking for it when mozilla killed my pc23:33
Jazzvabug 21745823:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 217458 in ubuntu "no additional plugins available for shockwave player" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21745823:33
Jazzvai think23:33
gnomefreakno23:33
Jazzvasorry, no23:33
gnomefreakill get it23:33
gnomefreak21572823:33
JazzvaBut it's something like that...23:33
gnomefreakbug 21572823:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 215728 in firefox-3.0 "[MASTER] Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite causes excessive CPU usage and disk I/O" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21572823:34
gnomefreakyep23:34
asac_thanks23:34
gnomefreaknp23:34
gnomefreaki was trying to use 217728 no wonder why it didnt work23:34
gnomefreakhmmmm firefox wont open now23:34
asac_ok totem is looping io here23:35
gnomefreakoh well i thought i saw another dup of that bug before bugzilla made me kill X than dead restart23:36
gnomefreakasac_: on your pc?23:36
asac_yeah23:36
asac_have to reboot i guess23:36
gnomefreakthats not good23:36
asac_cannot kill it anymore23:36
gnomefreakmozilla bug 33060523:37
ubottuMozilla bug 330605 in General "firefox / xorg take too much cpu on focus change / animation" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33060523:37
asac_reboot23:37
asac_cu soon hopefully :)23:37
gnomefreakmozilla bug 43053023:37
ubottuMozilla bug 430530 in Phishing Protection "excess disk IO when updating the url-classifier" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43053023:37
gnomefreakut oh23:38
gnomefreakJazzva: can you click on History does it open dialog named library?23:39
gnomefreakspelling isnt right23:39
gnomefreakmaybe it is23:39
gnomefreaksorry history than show all history23:39
JazzvaIt pops a menu... what history do you mean?23:40
Jazzvaoh23:40
gnomefreakthe all history pane23:40
Jazzvayep, it opens23:40
gnomefreakhmm maybe due to xulrunner updates mine isnt listing anything i just get the empty pane23:40
gnomefreakclass window whatever you call it23:41
JazzvaIs your history enabled? :)23:41
gnomefreakyeah23:41
JazzvaMine is disabled, so that's why I get an empty list23:41
gnomefreakfta: updated xulrunner from his PPA23:41
gnomefreakim using those packages on this set up23:41
JazzvaHmm, I'll try to enable it23:41
gnomefreaklet me see if its fixed23:41
gnomefreakyep it was xul update23:42
gnomefreakrestart ff and its fixed23:42
Jazzvaok23:42
gnomefreakok can ubufox fix this focus setting?23:44
gnomefreakits getting old and i never noticed it before23:44
asac_damn pulseaudio23:44
gnomefreakasac_: yeah lots of that going around, they thought about disabling it on release day23:44
gnomefreaklots of issues with it and other apps never alone23:45
asac_whoever on gnome voted for replacing esd by pulseaudio instead of writing a proper alsa/gstreamer backend probably was too lazy23:45
asac_and hoped that a sound server could suddenly really do what no other sound server was able to do before23:45
gnomefreakthis has to be same issue but only for 2 minutes23:46
gnomefreakit was the sound guys (not sure who other than crimsun is part of that23:47
gnomefreakbug 210079 reminds me of the IO CPU bug23:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 210079 in firefox-3.0 "firefox 3 freezes at start and on menu click or typing" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21007923:48
gnomefreakhas nothing to do with menu though atleast its only mentioned in first comment23:48
gnomefreakbug 38131 can be as well23:49
Jazzvaasac_: Can you take a look at my wiki page to see if it's ok for my motu application :)? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Jazzva23:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 38131 in firefox "Firefox causes massive Xorg CPU usage" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3813123:49
JazzvaThat is, if you have some free time23:49
gnomefreaki like it23:50
gnomefreakJazzva: you can merge? ;)23:50
Jazzvagnomefreak: Easy ones for now :)... Thanks :)23:51
gnomefreaki need to relearn/learn merging ive done a few but mostly just upgrading mozilla packages23:51
gnomefreakeasy works ive done gwget and iceape i think23:51
asac_Jazzva: I cant really tell if its enough for MOTU council. can you ping dholbach about it? imo you could polish it a bit by doing a few more merges now that intrepid has started.23:51
* gnomefreak needs to find easy ones to do but never can tell easy from hard until i get into it23:52
asac_not for the sake of merges itself, but for getting more people on the list who you have worked together with23:52
Jazzvaasac_: I'm planning to... 2 for sure (scrapbook and imagezoom (I think)), and few more :)23:52
asac_Jazzva: yes. try to do a bunch ... try to get them sponsored by other MOTU folks (at best some MOTUs that are well recognized)23:52
Jazzvato bother them at ubuntu-motu :)?23:53
JazzvaOr just to wait until someone picks it up?23:53
asac_Jazzva: yes. hang around at ubuntu-motu, bug them ... ask them to review and be responsive if they want something to be improved23:54
JazzvaOk, sure thing :)23:54
JazzvaThanks for the suggestions :)23:54
asac_i don't think its hard for you. just a bit of chatting there, so they know you and a few reviews/sponsorships so you have someone who you can CC on your motu application23:55
asac_i am sure you can get this done withing the first weeks of this intrepid cycle23:55
JazzvaYay :D... That would be great :).23:55
asac_after all we need your upload powers for extensions here :)23:56
asac_so please do it;)23:56
JazzvaThat's one of things I had in mind :).23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!