[04:56] <StevenK> ToddBrandt: I think you can set bug 207183 to Fix Released.
[06:28] <dholbach> good morning
[16:35] <mvo> I'm playing with the current hardy ubuntu mobile stuff (based on ports.ubuntu.com) and I wonder what the right way is to start X with it - you cerntainly don't use gdm, what package do you use for this?
[16:36] <mvo> (I'm fine with startx on the shell for now but there is certainly a better way :)
[16:42] <persia> startx is the method, but it's called out of the stuff in ume-config-common, with a default launch as the ume user
[16:42] <StevenK> mvo: ume-config-common or the -config packages contain an upstart script
[16:57] <mvo> StevenK: thanks, ume-config-common is a step ahead, now when I type startx I get a proper environment (some icons appear to be missing still) 
[18:35] <mschoolbus> hi :)
[18:36] <mschoolbus> is this the right place for ubuntu for arm processor?
[18:41] <GrueMaster> ﻿mschoolbus:  According to the FAQ (link at the top of the forum), no.
[18:43] <mschoolbus> danke
[19:10] <marqck> hi. im a newb and i need compiling this. how do i do it?
[19:10] <marqck> arm-elf-gcc -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time -mcpu=arm7tdmi
[19:10] <marqck> arm-elf-ld -Ttext 0x40004000 -N
[19:10] <marqck>  arm-elf-objcopy -Obinary
[19:10] <agoliveira> marqck: ﻿This channel is for conversations around the Ubuntu UME development version | Info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded. Please read the FAQ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded/FAQ
[19:28] <smagoun_> Is ume-config-common 0.10-1-0ubuntu3 from the PPA supposed to have 2 copies of each file? (I assume I already know the answer...)
[19:33] <smagoun_> lool: ^^ do you know where the ume-config-common tarball came from? It doesn't match what's at http://moblin.org/repos/releases/ume-config-common/
[19:33] <smagoun_> lool: as in, there is no 0.10-1.orig.tar.gz at moblin
[19:36] <persia> smagoun_: It may be a revisioning accident.  Traditionally, 0.10-1 would be a first Debian revision, and 0.10-0ubuntu1 would be a first Ubuntu revision.  Use of dh_make and reading of limited documentation could cause 0.10-1-0ubuntu1 to be generated, which would move slowly to *3 as it was updated.
[19:37] <persia> This would make ume-config-common-0.10.tar.gz the corresponding upstream (ideally).
[19:39] <smagoun_> persia: right, but the tarball in the PPA doesn't match upstream either. The tarball appeared from the ether.
[19:40] <persia> Ah.  Right.
[19:43] <persia> Oh.  I remember.  Inuka and I chatted about this.  There was a mistake in one revision that didn't define $(DESTDIR) cleanly, so it didn't work.  The build was run early, so the tarball in the PPA is messy.
[19:44] <persia> It's rather hard to clean nicely until 0.11 comes out, although I suppose we could do something to fuss with the versioning (e.g. 0.10.cleanup-0ubuntu1).
[19:46] <persia> The extraneous source in the tarball (e.g. ./usr/*) can safely be ignored, as it is not used.
[19:48] <smagoun_> persia: I already did a repack of ume-config-common a month or two ago, now it needs to happen again? :( I think I will continue my local merge and wait until 0.11 to revisit
[19:48] <smagoun_> persia: thanks for the help!
[19:48] <persia> smagoun_: I guess so.  Sorry for the confusion, and glad I could help.