[00:42] <bryce> added some totals at the bottom now
[08:42] <tseliot> tjaalton: doing this works for me (if I update the packages)
[08:42] <tseliot> http://pastebin.com/m1b462677
[08:43] <tseliot> no problem whatsoever
[08:43] <tseliot> it doesn't complain about a missing libwfb.so
[08:43] <tseliot> let me restart the Xserver
[08:46] <tseliot> tjaalton: it works well
[08:47] <tjaalton> well, doesn't work here
[08:48] <tseliot> did you remove the libwfb manually before?
[08:48] <tjaalton> no
[08:48] <tjaalton> so you have the correct libwfb.so in place?
[09:12] <tjaalton> yeah, putting the diversion removal in postinst works
[09:12] <tjaalton> no need to remove the symlink
[09:16] <tseliot> ﻿tjaalton: why did it fail when you removed the symlink? I mean, how come and when did it complain about the missing symlink?
[09:17] <tjaalton> it didn't complain about the symlink
[09:17] <tseliot> ﻿tjaalton: what happened then?
[09:18] <tjaalton> dpkg-divert complained
[09:18] <tjaalton> because the old package still claimed the symlink
[09:19] <tjaalton> and if we remove the symlink on preinst, dpkg-divert thinks that it doesn't need to put the real file back in place, instead removes it
[09:19] <tjaalton> but removing the diversion in postinst works fine
[09:20] <tjaalton> because at that point the old package has removed the symlink
[09:20] <tjaalton> and dpkg-divert moves libwfb.so back where it should be
[09:20] <tseliot> ok, this makes sense now
[09:23] <tseliot> thanks for the explanation ;)
[09:24] <tjaalton> np, helps me undestand it myself
[09:33] <tjaalton> bryce: I'll unsubscribe the team from the apps that are now in bundles, at least those that don't have any bugs
[09:33] <bryce> ok
[09:33] <bryce> tjaalton: I think I got most of them
[09:34] <tjaalton> yeah, seems like it.. there are some left :)
[09:34] <tjaalton> damn spammers, how dare they use my address when sendin spam
[09:34] <tjaalton> +g
[09:51] <tjaalton> I'll move xrandr bugs over to x11-xserver-utils
[10:41] <tjaalton> bryce: cleaned up lrm-2.6.17 bugs and unsubscribed the team
[14:09] <CLEARviewF> hi bryce, are you there?
[14:12] <CLEARviewF> anybody know if i have to wait for an answer when i make a bug report?
[14:13] <CLEARviewF> because nobady reply my bug report and my problem seems to be solved
[14:14] <CLEARviewF> i use to make bug reports, but i never get a reply of any of theese.
[14:15] <tjaalton> CLEARviewF: there are so many of them, and so few bug triagers..
[14:16] <CLEARviewF> i see, tjaalton
[14:16] <tjaalton> ..but since you are here, could you tell the bug #?
[14:17] <CLEARviewF> ok...wait a sec.
[14:17] <CLEARviewF> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/226632
[14:19] <CLEARviewF> ubottu: but my problem seems to be solved, becouse i have not the problem anymore in my system
[14:20] <tjaalton> ubottu is a bot
[14:21] <CLEARviewF> when i tried using ALSA or PULSE, i had the same problem, but know, i have the problem just with PULSE but ALSA works fine
[14:21] <CLEARviewF> jejeje, i see, tjaalton
[14:21] <CLEARviewF> :D
[14:21] <tjaalton> first of all, you should try to guess a package..
[14:21] <tjaalton> where the bug belongs
[14:22] <CLEARviewF> but, i dont know how to do that
[14:22] <tjaalton> how did you file the  bug?
[14:22] <tjaalton> it asks for a package
[14:23] <tjaalton> if you leave it empty, it'll end up in "ubuntu", which has >2000 open bugs
[14:23] <CLEARviewF> a package?
[14:24] <tjaalton> the software where the bug lies..
[14:24] <CLEARviewF> i followed every step on roporting Sound Bugs from Ubuntu Bug report how to's
[14:26] <CLEARviewF> tjaalton: BTW, how do i get 4.0 sound in my sound card?
[14:27] <tjaalton> no idea, this channel is about Xorg
[14:27] <CLEARviewF> i tried so many ways and i failed
[14:27] <tjaalton> which doesn't involve sound
[14:27] <tjaalton> try the forums
[14:27] <CLEARviewF> tjaalton: no problem, thank you
[14:28] <CLEARviewF> yes, i will, ...i did and i still do that :)
[14:28] <tjaalton> should I close the bug then?
[14:28] <CLEARviewF> no,no
[14:28] <CLEARviewF> maybe the problem is solved but i need to know how...
[14:28] <tjaalton> reassigned against pulseaudio?
[14:28] <CLEARviewF> i want to learn!
[14:29] <CLEARviewF> that is the reason i am waiting for a reply, i want to learn
[14:29] <tjaalton> if it's fixed by not using pulseaudio, then the bug is probably in pulseaudio
[14:30] <tjaalton> you might end up waiting for a long time if you don't specify the package
[14:30] <CLEARviewF> can you move it to Pulse Audio Bug Reports?
[14:30] <CLEARviewF> tjaalton: 
[14:30] <tjaalton> yes
[14:30] <tjaalton> done
[14:30] <CLEARviewF> thank you, tjaalton
[14:30] <tjaalton> np
[14:30] <CLEARviewF> :)
[21:19] <Q-FUNK> ok, geode 2.9.0-1 (libDDC patch merge) is waiting at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-geode/xserver-xorg-video-geode_2.9.0-1.dsc to be sponsored into Debian, following which it could be sync'ed in for hardy-updates.
[21:20] <Q-FUNK> should I rename bug #214119 to indicate the SRU request?
[22:09] <tjaalton> Q-FUNK: I'm not sure renaming is that important.. at least I haven't used it
[22:09] <tjaalton> just subscribe ubuntu-sru and request a sync
[22:10] <tjaalton> hm, if a sync is possible
[22:10] <tjaalton> don't know
[22:11] <Q-FUNK> ok
[22:13] <Q-FUNK> tjaalton: and you said that the PCI ID patch was merged in svn?  is that released to hardy-updates already?
[22:13] <Q-FUNK> I'm just tryng to see what remains to be done, before i can chalk the Koolu issue completely off.
[22:14] <tjaalton> git, no it's not uploaded yet
[22:15] <Q-FUNK> I cannot remember, does ubuntu has a hardy-proposed-updates or other similar staging area where packages can be tested before it enters 8.04.1 ?
[22:15] <Q-FUNK> öö.. have
[22:16] <tjaalton> hardy-proposed, yes