| === cprov is now known as cprov-afk | ||
| === cprov-afk is now known as cprov | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === EdwinGrub is now known as EdwinGrubbs | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| * Rinchen sobs for mootbot | 18:57 | |
| schwuk | be brave Rinchen | 18:58 |
|---|---|---|
| kiko | WTF is mootbot | 18:58 |
| gmb | It's been eaten by a grue. | 18:58 |
| sinzui | kiko: It was Rinchen's horse. We shot it when it broke its leg. | 18:58 |
| schwuk | it is no more | 18:59 |
| gmb | It is an ex bot | 18:59 |
| Rinchen | it sunk with seveas | 18:59 |
| sinzui | It has ceased to be | 18:59 |
| schwuk | it has shuffled of this mortal coil | 18:59 |
| Rinchen | there's a meeting coming up to talk about the future of all the bots | 18:59 |
| Rinchen | like ubotu | 18:59 |
| bigjools | 'e 'as gone to meet 'is maker | 18:59 |
| kiko | Rinchen, really? | 18:59 |
| kiko | dinnaknothat | 18:59 |
| sinzui | It is an ex-bot | 18:59 |
| Rinchen | well, mootbot is offline. Dennis is still around. :-) | 19:00 |
| Rinchen | just not on irc | 19:00 |
| schwuk | sinzui: gmb beat you to it | 19:00 |
| === EdwinGrub is now known as EdwinGrubbs | ||
| mpt | I could pretend to be MootBot | 19:00 |
| Rinchen | scribes team has had a few offers but they are not sure what to do because mootbot is eggdrop code. They were talking about building it into ubotu | 19:00 |
| sinzui | damn | 19:00 |
| sinzui | Let's move on to the cheese shop sketch then | 19:01 |
| mpt | (just without the semi-permanent-record part) | 19:01 |
| Rinchen | eggdrop makes swiss cheese look like high-density concrete | 19:01 |
| kiko | go! | 19:01 |
| Rinchen | Welcome to this week's Launchpad development meeting. For the next 45 minutes or so, we'll be coordinating Launchpad development. | 19:01 |
| gmb | sinzui: I'll fetch my bourzouki, hang on. | 19:01 |
| Rinchen | Roll Call | 19:01 |
| Rinchen | me! | 19:01 |
| mrevell | me | 19:01 |
| mpt | me | 19:01 |
| bigjools | me | 19:01 |
| gmb | mě | 19:01 |
| flacoste | me | 19:01 |
| mars | me | 19:01 |
| intellectronica | me | 19:01 |
| bac | me | 19:01 |
| sinzui | me | 19:01 |
| salgado | me | 19:01 |
| adeuring | me | 19:01 |
| thumper | me | 19:01 |
| SteveA | me | 19:01 |
| stub | ,e | 19:01 |
| barry | me | 19:01 |
| matsubara | me | 19:01 |
| leonardr | me | 19:01 |
| stub | me | 19:01 |
| schwuk | me | 19:01 |
| herb | me | 19:01 |
| kiko | me | 19:01 |
| jt1 | me | 19:01 |
| danilos | me | 19:02 |
| statik | me | 19:02 |
| EdwinGrubbs | me | 19:02 |
| Rinchen | jt1 = jtv in disguise | 19:02 |
| Rinchen | Releases is here | 19:02 |
| === jt1 is now known as jtv | ||
| Rinchen | foundations, bugs, etc? | 19:02 |
| jtv | Rinchen: no, that was an impostor. Here I am. | 19:02 |
| sinzui | not a very good disguise it seems | 19:02 |
| statik | lpcomm is here | 19:02 |
| cprov | me | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | ok there is soyuz | 19:03 |
| al-maisan | me | 19:03 |
| bigjools | soyuz was here ages ago :) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | allenap_, BjornT ? | 19:03 |
| flacoste | Rinchen: foundations all there | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | and I see thumper...ok, let's go | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | Agenda | 19:03 |
| BjornT | me | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Next meeting | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Actions from last meeting | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Oops report (Matsubara) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Critical Bugs (Rinchen) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Bug tags | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Operations report (mthaddon/herb) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * DBA report (stub) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * Sysadmin requests (Rinchen) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * New packages required (salgado) | 19:03 |
| Rinchen | * A top user-affecting issue (mrevell) | 19:04 |
| Rinchen | * Doc Team report (mrevell) | 19:04 |
| Rinchen | Next meeting | 19:04 |
| Rinchen | well, there was not much consensus on the rotation option email | 19:04 |
| Rinchen | Kiko, SteveA - you're still against two meetings, correct? | 19:04 |
| kiko | I'm not against anything per se, but we lose a lot by having separate meetings. | 19:05 |
| allenap_ | me, sorry I'm late | 19:05 |
| kiko | so I find the drawbacks kinda high | 19:05 |
| SteveA | I'm against split meetings | 19:05 |
| Rinchen | that leaves us to pick one, or do thumper's 6 hour incrementing meeting | 19:05 |
| SteveA | I'm fine with having two meetings, provided they're approximately one week apart | 19:05 |
| Rinchen | lol | 19:05 |
| kiko | incrementing meetings are a bit scary in that everybody gets confused | 19:05 |
| thumper | SteveA: :) | 19:05 |
| thumper | kiko: people are smart enough | 19:05 |
| thumper | and we have a team calendar | 19:05 |
| kiko | thumper, speaking from experience on the Ubuntu side, not really. | 19:06 |
| gmb | Also, we set the next meeting date in the meeting... | 19:06 |
| kiko | so I'm kinda -1 on rotating meetings | 19:06 |
| kiko | but +1 on two meeting times alternating | 19:06 |
| kiko | sounds like nobody liked the times there, though | 19:06 |
| kiko | could we propose other times? | 19:06 |
| kiko | I will be at both meetings | 19:06 |
| thumper | midnight UTC is good for me :) | 19:06 |
| kiko | worksforme | 19:07 |
| jtv | gah | 19:07 |
| Rinchen | I can go back and look for other slots | 19:07 |
| Rinchen | the 11am UTC one is the one with the most chance more highest attendance | 19:07 |
| kiko | anyway, if no decision comes in through email this week, same time next week. | 19:07 |
| kiko | what time is that for jtv? | 19:07 |
| Rinchen | ok, I'll set up everything for 18:00 UTC for next week and we can change it | 19:07 |
| kiko | moving on | 19:07 |
| mpt | kiko, 1am-ish | 19:08 |
| jtv | kiko: 07:00, or 6 hours before my working day | 19:08 |
| SteveA | jtv is in thailand. surely he can get drugs to make the current meeting time palettable | 19:08 |
| * mpt doesn't know what he's talking about | 19:08 | |
| jtv | SteveA: to me, yes. To you? Funny maybe, but... | 19:08 |
| intellectronica | Rinchen: if so then i'm afraid i'll have to miss next week. sorry! | 19:08 |
| Rinchen | right then, moving on | 19:08 |
| Rinchen | oh, thanks intellectronica | 19:08 |
| Rinchen | Actions from last meeting | 19:08 |
| Rinchen | none | 19:08 |
| Rinchen | Oops report (Matsubara) | 19:08 |
| matsubara | Today's oops report is about bugs 228305, OOPS-855EB78, 228307. | 19:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 228305 in malone "OOPS accessing contextless bug url" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/228305 | 19:09 |
| matsubara | intellectronica, can you take 228305. I think it's related to the email interface. It needs further investigation. | 19:09 |
| matsubara | cprov, wasn't OOPS-855EB78 RCFIXED? Or is that a new one? | 19:09 |
| kiko | jtv, 7pm? | 19:09 |
| intellectronica | matsubara: sure, i'll investigate and fix as appropriate | 19:09 |
| jtv | kiko: midnight UTC is 7am for me. | 19:09 |
| matsubara | I've noticed some timeouts in +storeblob and +hwdb/+submit pages. I've asked about it to flacoste last Friday. More eyes on the issue would be appreciated(#228307) | 19:09 |
| kiko | jtv, it's 11am utc. | 19:09 |
| cprov | matsubara: bigjools fixed it last friday, IIRC | 19:09 |
| flacoste | my hypothesis was some libarian connection dalys | 19:10 |
| jtv | kiko: 11am utc is just dandy for me. | 19:10 |
| matsubara | cprov: the oops is from sunday, on edge | 19:10 |
| flacoste | but that's just a wild guess | 19:10 |
| kiko | matsubara, so hmmm something else is amiss? | 19:10 |
| cprov | matsubara: uhmm ... let me check it again then | 19:10 |
| SteveA | do we record times taken talking to the HTTP librarian? | 19:11 |
| SteveA | if not, we should do | 19:11 |
| SteveA | and these should be available in OOPS reports | 19:11 |
| SteveA | as a general principle, any time we do something that talks to another process or another computer, we should record the time taken | 19:11 |
| cprov | matsubara: no, that's a new oops, needs a bug. | 19:11 |
| matsubara | cprov: I'll file one after the meeting. thanks for checking | 19:12 |
| kiko | SteveA, for the upload? we do not. | 19:12 |
| matsubara | SteveA: I don't think we do. | 19:12 |
| cprov | matsubara: np, thank you | 19:12 |
| matsubara | SteveA: I mean, I don't think we do the logging | 19:12 |
| SteveA | that's too bad. it would help us out in knowing what's going on. | 19:12 |
| flacoste | librarian logging sucks also, but that's probably another issue | 19:13 |
| Rinchen | matsubara, anything else? | 19:14 |
| matsubara | Rinchen: that's all from me. | 19:14 |
| Rinchen | thanks | 19:14 |
| Rinchen | Critical Bugs (Rinchen) | 19:14 |
| matsubara | thanks all. I'll update the bug | 19:14 |
| Rinchen | Memory issue. flacoste, can we reopen the bug since it's still a problem, or create a new one? How is the current investigation going? | 19:14 |
| SteveA | matsubara: would you file a bug on the librarian client that it should record times for HTTP calls | 19:15 |
| flacoste | Rinchen: file a new one | 19:15 |
| matsubara | SteveA: sure. doing it now | 19:15 |
| flacoste | and SteveA thinks it might be related to batch size | 19:15 |
| SteveA | thanks | 19:15 |
| flacoste | i'm going to put a hard limit on it | 19:15 |
| flacoste | 300 | 19:15 |
| stub | (watch out for the exception handler that uploads the exception to the librarian - might end up in a loop) | 19:15 |
| SteveA | Rinchen: earlier, tom, jtv and I did some experiments on staging | 19:15 |
| kiko | I am okay with that. would be even happier with 500 but anyway.. :) | 19:15 |
| flacoste | i'm going to file a bug about the batch size issue | 19:15 |
| jtv | flacoste: I just discussed the issue with sinzui as well, so | 19:15 |
| Rinchen | thanks flacoste | 19:15 |
| jtv | flacoste: can we get together and compare notes? | 19:16 |
| Rinchen | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/rosetta/+bug/224617 | 19:16 |
| Rinchen | jtv - is this really critical or simply high? | 19:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 224617 in rosetta "XPI import stumbles over malformed or email-less contributor entries." [Critical,In progress] | 19:16 |
| jtv | flacoste: (I have a bug for the Translations side) | 19:16 |
| SteveA | and we could see a large-ish memory increase for translation pages with large batch sizes | 19:16 |
| jtv | Rinchen: that's critical to the Firefox people. | 19:16 |
| jtv | Rinchen: the fix landed today, and I'm negotiating a CP | 19:17 |
| Rinchen | jtv, k, thanks. | 19:17 |
| kiko | Rinchen, jtv: I'm going to chat with asac; meanwhile jtv will test on staging. | 19:17 |
| Rinchen | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/224623 | 19:17 |
| Rinchen | DB load. stub, mthaddon - this hasn't been worked on. Therefore I submit that it's not a critical bug but rather high. Do you agree? | 19:17 |
| ubottu | Rinchen: Error: This bug is private | 19:17 |
| Rinchen | :-) | 19:17 |
| kiko | agreed. | 19:17 |
| flacoste | jtv: sure | 19:17 |
| flacoste | jtv: grab me after meeting | 19:17 |
| jtv | flacoste: not now though; it's deep night and I've been at it for 15 hours straight | 19:17 |
| Rinchen | herb, if you could pass that on | 19:18 |
| herb | will do | 19:18 |
| flacoste | jtv: ok, i'll probably fix it later today though | 19:18 |
| Rinchen | I'll go ahead and lower this. If it happens again, herb if you could get Tom to update the details in the bug report please. thanks | 19:18 |
| stub | I'll flag Bug 224623 as incomplete - there is no way to progress the bug report. | 19:18 |
| jtv | flacoste: okay, then we'll have to do it right after | 19:18 |
| herb | Rinchen: got it. | 19:18 |
| SteveA | Rinchen: we should adapt some code that gustavo wrote for landscape | 19:18 |
| ubottu | stub: Bug 224623 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/224623 is private | 19:18 |
| Rinchen | ok, thanks stub | 19:18 |
| SteveA | Rinchen: to limit the connections that are accepted from the network into the webapp | 19:19 |
| SteveA | Rinchen: based on the size of the queue of connections waiting for app threads. | 19:19 |
| Rinchen | Sounds like a job for spec circumstances or foundations. | 19:19 |
| SteveA | Rinchen: that will keep launchpad responsive even in situations that look like the one described by tom in the bug report | 19:19 |
| SteveA | it's a foundations job, for post 2.0 | 19:19 |
| SteveA | which we can look at moving forward if it happens again | 19:20 |
| Rinchen | ok, I'll add that to the laundry list. :-) | 19:20 |
| Rinchen | That's it from me. | 19:20 |
| Rinchen | Operations report (mthaddon/herb) | 19:20 |
| herb | Highlights from the last week: | 19:20 |
| herb | - 05/02: Production re-roll. | 19:20 |
| herb | - 05/05: lpnet6 (running with the debug config) stopped responding and was restarted. | 19:20 |
| herb | - 05/06: lpnet4 died and was restarted. | 19:20 |
| herb | - 05/06: Cherry pick r6222 to lpnet* | 19:20 |
| herb | - 05/07: Restarted librarian after a 13 minute outage. | 19:20 |
| herb | New edge server running hardy should be up and in the rotation starting tomorrow. | 19:20 |
| herb | No update from us on the memory issue. The debug instance (lpnet6) doesn't seem to be growing in the same way that the non-debug instances are. The typical lpnet process seems to grow to 800-1000MB RSS (3x-5x it's initial RSS) within a few hours and stay there idefinitely. | 19:20 |
| herb | That's it from Tom and me unless there are any questions. | 19:20 |
| stub | So we should fix the memory issue by running in debug mode? :-/ | 19:21 |
| SteveA | herb: did you get anyone to look at lp6 when it stopped responding? | 19:21 |
| kiko | what's the overhead in running debug mode? | 19:21 |
| SteveA | kiko: lots | 19:21 |
| SteveA | kiko: we run single threaded | 19:21 |
| SteveA | and it doesn't fix the memory issues | 19:22 |
| herb | SteveA: Tom handled it. so I don't know. I know he copied the ref* files over in case there was something of value in there. | 19:22 |
| jtv | "Less damage per second" | 19:22 |
| SteveA | it makes them less likely to occur, because the server handles fewer requests | 19:22 |
| flacoste | maybe 800-1000Mb is what LP needs as working memory to process our requests that perform badly | 19:22 |
| herb | 1/16th the number of requests. | 19:22 |
| SteveA | herb: if an app server becomes unresponsive and it's only one, please take it out of rotation in the load balancer | 19:22 |
| SteveA | and then find someone ifrastructural to look into it | 19:22 |
| SteveA | if two go down in the same way, then restart the second one, leaving the first one hung | 19:23 |
| SteveA | please add this to the LOSA operational manual, or whatever :-) | 19:23 |
| herb | SteveA: ok. | 19:23 |
| SteveA | we can usually afford to lose one app server | 19:23 |
| Rinchen | anything else for herb? | 19:24 |
| herb | SteveA: when you say someone infrastructural, who should we be looking for? | 19:24 |
| SteveA | and it's good to have the opportunity to diagnose it | 19:24 |
| SteveA | a member of the foundations team | 19:24 |
| SteveA | or SC | 19:24 |
| SteveA | or me | 19:24 |
| herb | SteveA: ok | 19:24 |
| Rinchen | herb, you can ping steve, kiko, or I on -code if it happens and we can help you find someone | 19:24 |
| herb | Rinchen: sounds good. | 19:24 |
| Rinchen | thanks herb | 19:24 |
| Rinchen | off we go.... | 19:24 |
| Rinchen | DBA report (stub) | 19:24 |
| stub | The production DB server is being upgraded to hardy as soon as IS can schedule it. This involves downtime. | 19:25 |
| stub | Hopefully we get the PQM box running Hardy at around the same time. This means we can switch to PG 8.3 for development. | 19:25 |
| stub | If things go to plan, we can upgrade production to PG 8.3 later with minimal downtime. I need to test using Slony-I to perform the migration with real data on Carbon once it has been Hardified. | 19:25 |
| stub | Devs will need to switch to PG 8.3 when PQM switches. You are welcome to switch earlier if you want. The docs are already updated on the Wiki. | 19:25 |
| stub | Had a good discussion on the person/auth split with jamesh and refactored the model again. The diagram on the wiki page has been updated (and no longer matches the text). | 19:25 |
| stub | OOT. | 19:25 |
| Rinchen | Better watch out kiko, I'm going to hardify you | 19:26 |
| thumper | oot? | 19:26 |
| Rinchen | lol | 19:26 |
| stub | over and out | 19:26 |
| SteveA | out of time | 19:26 |
| thumper | ah | 19:26 |
| kiko | Rinchen, I'm on hardy!! | 19:26 |
| SteveA | our obstinate technologist | 19:26 |
| Rinchen | jtv, put down that GTA list right now and step away from the computer | 19:26 |
| jtv | Rinchen: it's GTF | 19:26 |
| SteveA | our other thailander | 19:26 |
| Rinchen | Thanks stub | 19:26 |
| jtv | Rinchen: and you're too late: it's already uploading | 19:26 |
| Rinchen | Sysadmin requests (Rinchen) | 19:27 |
| Rinchen | Is anyone blocked on an RT or have any that are becoming urgent? | 19:27 |
| mrevell | our original Thailander? | 19:27 |
| Rinchen | and bigjools, I didn't look, are you done? | 19:27 |
| SteveA | mrevell: nice | 19:27 |
| bigjools | Rinchen: yes! \o/ | 19:27 |
| Rinchen | yippee | 19:27 |
| bigjools | Rinchen: having said that I need to talk to flacoste about the restricted librarian rollout, which will need another RT | 19:28 |
| flacoste | i suck | 19:28 |
| flacoste | sorry, completely forgot that one | 19:28 |
| kiko | jesus guys | 19:28 |
| Rinchen | Pass it my way and I'll do the priority magic on it | 19:28 |
| kiko | this was due last CENTURY | 19:28 |
| Rinchen | I'll get SteveA to do a rain dance too | 19:29 |
| bigjools | flacoste: are you free after the meeting sometime? | 19:29 |
| Rinchen | kiko, yeah, bigjools ppa fought the Hardy release and Hardy won | 19:29 |
| Rinchen | New packages required (salgado) | 19:30 |
| flacoste | bigjools: tomorrow might be better, i have three persons already in line :-( | 19:30 |
| salgado | anything to add to launchpad-dependencies this week? | 19:30 |
| Rinchen | beer? | 19:30 |
| SteveA | so... | 19:30 |
| kiko | not that I can think of | 19:30 |
| SteveA | if launchpad-dependencies were managed in /sourcecode | 19:30 |
| kiko | thanks salgado! | 19:30 |
| SteveA | then we could have a check on 'make run' | 19:30 |
| SteveA | that warned if launchpad-dependencies is not of the appropriate version for this LP tree | 19:30 |
| flacoste | SteveA: we can have a check even if it's not managed in sourcecode | 19:31 |
| SteveA | sorry to bring up this old chestnut, but I miss xmas | 19:31 |
| SteveA | flacoste: it means we need to record the version number somewhere, and keep it up to date | 19:31 |
| SteveA | flacoste: rather than just work off what's in /sourcecode | 19:31 |
| Rinchen | SteveA, how about you file a bug for that and tell flacoste about it? | 19:32 |
| kiko | SteveA, well, depends if sourcecode is linked out of somewhere or not | 19:32 |
| kiko | i.e. if it is shared | 19:32 |
| flacoste | Won't fix | 19:32 |
| Rinchen | we won't lose your chestnut then | 19:32 |
| Rinchen | flacoste, well, you can negotiate that with your boss ;-) | 19:33 |
| Rinchen | going once | 19:34 |
| flacoste | we need more value out of it to offset the additional process cost | 19:34 |
| Rinchen | ok, sounds like an offline discussion is in order. ACTION: Steve and Francis to chat about dependencies and make check | 19:34 |
| SteveA | thanks, but it's fine | 19:35 |
| Rinchen | A top user-affecting issue (mrevell) | 19:35 |
| mrevell | howdy | 19:35 |
| SteveA | I will go with flacoste's judgement on this issue. I'm sure we'll revisit it later, once we move more of launchpad code into launchpad. | 19:35 |
| mrevell | A common theme over the past week - although we haven't been inundated with requests - has been requests to either report spam or edit existing bug comments. | 19:35 |
| mrevell | As we've discussed this in meetings before, I'd be interested in hearing from other people who have either dealt with or seen an interesting user-affecting issue. | 19:35 |
| flacoste | SteveA: actually, once servers are upgraded to hardy, the cost will lessen, so we should revisit at that time | 19:36 |
| intellectronica | one thing i encountered is users wanting to edit or delete their own comments | 19:36 |
| SteveA | we need to have "add a 'report this comment' link on comments" and the same for other user-submitted content | 19:36 |
| intellectronica | for example, because they disclosed information they would rather not, accidentally | 19:36 |
| SteveA | and that should be on the post-2.0 list | 19:36 |
| SteveA | services like facebook do this well | 19:37 |
| mrevell | intellectronica: Yes, I've seen that come up too. There's a problem of editing history there, though, isn't there? | 19:37 |
| stub | Why is that a problem? | 19:37 |
| intellectronica | "other user-submitted content"? almost all of it is... | 19:37 |
| intellectronica | mrevell: what do you mean by "editing history"? | 19:37 |
| kiko | intellectronica, changing what I said in the past. | 19:37 |
| mpt | mrevell, not if it's within five minutes or before anyone else comments. | 19:37 |
| mrevell | intellectronica: Someone could edit their comment to cast themselves in a better light, perhaps. | 19:37 |
| mrevell | mpt: Hmm, fair point. | 19:38 |
| mpt | (5 minutes being when the mail notification goes out) | 19:38 |
| Rinchen | There is a general topic of spam handling that I've already added on behalf of the OSAs | 19:38 |
| stub | Why is that a problem? We are writing a bug tracker and things - not a banking system. | 19:38 |
| Rinchen | on the post-2.0 list | 19:38 |
| mrevell | Do we have a bug report? I didn't see one. | 19:38 |
| mpt | We have bug reports on both those issues | 19:38 |
| mpt | spam is bug 45419 | 19:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 45419 in launchpad "Launchpad needs a way of easily flagging spam" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/45419 | 19:38 |
| SteveA | I think we should always keep the comments | 19:38 |
| mpt | I don't remember the editing one offhand | 19:39 |
| mrevell | mpt: Yeah, I saw the spam but not the edit history. I'll look again, thanks. | 19:39 |
| SteveA | and hide them, and have a link saying "N comments removed" | 19:39 |
| SteveA | openness is important | 19:39 |
| mpt | bug 80895 | 19:39 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 80895 in malone "Give people five minutes to edit/delete their comment" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/80895 | 19:39 |
| mrevell | thanks mpt | 19:39 |
| mpt | np | 19:39 |
| mrevell | As we have a plan, I'm done. | 19:40 |
| kiko | yep | 19:40 |
| Rinchen | Doc Team report (mrevell) | 19:40 |
| kiko | it's post 2.0 unfo | 19:40 |
| intellectronica | mpt: i'm not sure 5 minutes is enough. i realise that after that we've sent an email anyway, but i suspect that in some cases users will still want to remove a comment | 19:40 |
| BjornT | SteveA: a db patch was landed last cycle, which will allow us to hide comment. we just need to implement it. | 19:40 |
| mrevell | I'd like to give the doc team members a list of bite-sized items that would be outside the scope of our normal docs work. If you have ideas for such work, that involves your part of LP, please let me know. | 19:40 |
| mrevell | On a docs-related note: Rinchen, Statik and I are recording a new episode of the Launchpad podcast next week. All ideas, such as suggestions of CC-licensed music for the theme and a name are welcome :) | 19:40 |
| mpt | intellectronica, then they can put themselves into the "Inappropriate" queue just like anyone marking spam | 19:40 |
| mpt | and be moderated accordingly | 19:40 |
| SteveA | mrevell: a new episode? | 19:41 |
| SteveA | mrevell: we have episodes? what's the RSS feed? I'll add it to my reader | 19:41 |
| intellectronica | mpt: maybe you're right. anyway, there's a bug, so let's continue there | 19:41 |
| mpt | sure | 19:41 |
| jtv | 4-minute warning... | 19:41 |
| gmb | SteveA: I think there was one too many adjectives in mrevell's sentence. | 19:41 |
| mrevell | SteveA: Well, let's say episode 1.0, to the version 0 that I posted last year. The feed is... | 19:41 |
| mrevell | http://news.launchpad.net/category/podcast/feed | 19:42 |
| SteveA | thanks | 19:42 |
| mrevell | Thanks Rinchen | 19:42 |
| Rinchen | Thanks. | 19:42 |
| Rinchen | Thank you all for attending this week's Launchpad Developer Meeting. | 19:42 |
| Rinchen | The end! | 19:42 |
| thumper | thanks Rinchen | 19:42 |
| SteveA | thanks Rinchen ! | 19:43 |
| jtv | thanks Rinchen! | 19:43 |
| * Rinchen laments the loss of Mootbot. | 19:43 | |
| SteveA | mootbot, I mourns it | 19:43 |
| Rinchen | I'll just have to get the scissors out and cut up this log. | 19:43 |
| kiko | woo | 19:43 |
| Rinchen | matsubara, pass me the glue eh? | 19:43 |
| Rinchen | gmb, can I use your scissors? Yours seem awfully sharp. | 19:44 |
| intellectronica | did anybody say "glue"? | 19:44 |
| * intellectronica sniffles | 19:44 | |
| gmb | Rinchen: Alas, I only use scalpels. | 19:44 |
| Rinchen | gmb, ok, I'll check with sinzui then. Last I knew his where pink | 19:45 |
| Rinchen | or maybe they were pinking shears.... | 19:45 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
| === salgado-brb is now known as salgado | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
| === EdwinGrub is now known as EdwinGrubbs | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!