[10:18] <Myrtti> we needs more peeple here
[12:07] <bazhang> no log bots?
[12:10] <Myrtti> What where
[12:19] <jdavies> bazhang: ubuntulog dumps the stuff at irclogs.ubuntu.com
[12:20] <bazhang> thanks jdavies  :)
[12:20] <jdavies> bazhang: you're welcome :)
[12:21] <bazhang> :)
[19:25] <ompaul> why would a channel have locobot5 and 3 in it?
[19:28] <Myrtti> :-o
[19:29] <Tm_T> hi kids
[19:29] <Pici> Whats a locobot?
[19:30] <Myrtti> a bot that logs the loco channels, I believe
[19:30] <ompaul> a bot for logging in loco channels
[19:30] <ompaul> I am curious as to why there were two in a channel
[19:30] <ompaul> that was all
[19:30] <Myrtti> on the other hand, it might not be such a bad idea if you think you can't afford losing one single line of logs
[19:31] <ompaul> pfft it is the -ie channel
[19:31] <ompaul> not a hive of contention :)
[19:31] <Myrtti> but the bots have generally been robust and stable as rock
[19:31] <ompaul> some one removed one a few minutes ago
[19:31] <ompaul> and I would like to know policy more so than anything else