| tseliot | tjaalton: can you have a look at the nvidia-glx-dev.postrm.in of the lrm, please? | 15:26 |
|---|---|---|
| tseliot | maybe it's just my impression but I think there's something wrong with them | 15:26 |
| tseliot | for example shouldn't be looking for /usr/lib/libGL.so in the 1st diversion instead of /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa ? | 15:28 |
| tjaalton | tseliot: no it's correct | 19:04 |
| tjaalton | hmm | 19:05 |
| tjaalton | it doesn't seem to remove the diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so | 19:07 |
| tjaalton | ah | 19:14 |
| tjaalton | wrong package | 19:15 |
| tjaalton | tseliot: it's irrelevant which one dpkg-divert lists, they both give the same result | 19:24 |
| tseliot | yes, I tried to say 2 things at the same time. I wanted to say that it should remove the diversion made by the -dev package | 20:18 |
| tseliot | tjaalton: the other problem which I wanted to report might be specific to my own packages (nvidia-glx.postrm.in) . I have yet to see if the same problem affects the default lrm. I'll let you know if it does. | 20:23 |
| tjaalton | tseliot: it does remove them all | 21:39 |
| tseliot | tjaalton: in my packages (for some reason) /usr/lib32 is removed before the diversions are removed. It might depend on my rules though. The .postrm itself is ok. | 21:44 |
| tjaalton | ok | 21:48 |
| pwnguin | are the openGL manpages under an evil license? | 23:56 |
| jcristau | if by evil you mean not free, then yes, iirc | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!